Slashdot Mirror


China Plans Massive Sea Lab 10,000 Feet Underwater In the South China Sea (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader writes: In an effort to hunt for materials, China is planning to build a manned deep-sea platform in the South China Sea. The lab may also serve for military purposes in the disputed waters as well. The lab would be located as much as 3,000 meters (9,800 ft) below sea level, according to a recent Science Ministry presentation viewed by Bloomberg. Bloomberg writes: "The project was mentioned in China's current five-year economic plan released in March and ranked number two on a list of the top 100 science and technology priorities." There are few public details specifying the timeline of the project, any blueprints, costs or where exactly it will be located. China's President Xi Jinping considers more than 80 percent of the waters its sovereign territory. The country has even created several artificial islands in the South China Sea covering 3,200 acres. Last year, the NYT posted a fascinated piece showing clear satellite imagery of the new islands being built.

101 comments

  1. If you're lookin for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You better check under the sea

    'cause that is where you'll find me

    Underneath the

    SeaLab

    Underneath the water

    Underneath the

    SeaLab

    At the bottom of the sea...

    1. Re:If you're lookin for me by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      You'll find that it's better! Down where it's wetter!! Un... um... erm...

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:If you're lookin for me by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      It'll be perfect if it's finished by 2021 and is run by a guy named Murphy!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re: If you're lookin for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except for Pod 6. Those Pod 6 guys are a bunch of jerks.

    4. Re: If you're lookin for me by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Have you seen Gus?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:If you're lookin for me by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Have a Bebop Cola with Hesh.

  2. They learned rhetoric from us by mi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China Plans Massive Sea Lab 10,000 Feet Underwater In the South China Sea

    See, now America's attempts to keep them restrained in that area will be perceived as anti-science. Very, very clever...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:They learned rhetoric from us by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      Nothing stops anyone from building a sea lab in the open ocean. This isn't like the fake constructed islands, which international laws of the sea do not recognize as granting either the 12 mile military or 200 mile economic (fishing) exclusion zones.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:They learned rhetoric from us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously China doesn't believe in AGW.. otherwise why spend tens of billions building airports mere meters above sea level?

      Ergo, Climate Change is a pseudoscience.

    3. Re:They learned rhetoric from us by microbox · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter. The chinese economy is a disaster waiting to unwind. Building an underwater military facility is just the type of wasteful boondoogle that communist party loves.

      --

      Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
    4. Re:They learned rhetoric from us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who knows maybe south Korea or Japan want to start a research in shark adapted high power lasers, for scientific purposes of course

    5. Re:They learned rhetoric from us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter. The chinese economy is a disaster waiting to unwind.

      This. It's funny how nobody seems to notice their completely unsustainable economic model. In fact, it's a wonder that they're still afloat. There will never be a 'Chinese century'.

    6. Re:They learned rhetoric from us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BLUE HADES might...

    7. Re: They learned rhetoric from us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think never sounds like an awfully big amount of time to predict.

      I might agree purely on the bounds that if all goes well, America, China and Russia will collapse and stupid things like nations will eventually dissolve. If technology pulls off many of the things they're working on, it may be possible to collapse the entire world economy making money irrelevant. When that happens, we'll probably see some pretty horrible wars, but what comes next will be much better.

      Now if only the US and the Middle East would stop fighting over who's prophet of a sky god has a bigger nut sack, there might be hope for humanity. I'm personally a bit tired of the drama attached with idiots claiming righteousness and then hating on those who disagree with them. It's like watching reality crap like Big Brother, Paradise Hotel or the American elections.

    8. Re:They learned rhetoric from us by jandersen · · Score: 1

      See, now America's attempts to keep them restrained in that area will be perceived as anti-science. Very, very clever...

      Has that really been taken serious in the last few decades? China knows that they can do whatever they please, as long as they don't endanger the stability of the world order in the short term. It isn't just in the local area they are being clever - where we in the West have traditionally made ourselves somewhat unpopular in the Middle East, Africa anf South America, China are building up a rather better reputation amongst the locals. We can hardly justify criticizing what they do, which it the clever bit, I think; we should have done it ourselves.

    9. Re:They learned rhetoric from us by gtall · · Score: 2

      Yes, but that is not how China will treat that lab. Their take over of the S. China Sea is only preparation for assaulting Taiwan with bad governance and the PLA. They figure it is not too dissimilar to when they discovered they owned Tibet because their ancestors use to go potty there several centuries ago. Their discovery of Taiwan is based on the grounds the Taiwanese are really Chinese, even the natives. They have not yet been able to get Taiwan to fork over their country to the Muppets in Beijing, so they'll have to do a Tibet on them. Preparations are already being made across the Taiwanese straits. The Muppets just have to wait long enough to remove the U.S.'s ability to fulfill their treat obligations to Taiwan. I give it another 10 years before China will take Taiwan and do for it what they are doing to Hong Kong.

    10. Re:They learned rhetoric from us by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that is not how China will treat that lab. Their take over of the S. China Sea is only preparation for assaulting Taiwan with bad governance and the PLA. They figure it is not too dissimilar to when they discovered they owned Tibet because their ancestors use to go potty there several centuries ago. Their discovery of Taiwan is based on the grounds the Taiwanese are really Chinese, even the natives. They have not yet been able to get Taiwan to fork over their country to the Muppets in Beijing, so they'll have to do a Tibet on them. Preparations are already being made across the Taiwanese straits. The Muppets just have to wait long enough to remove the U.S.'s ability to fulfill their treat obligations to Taiwan. I give it another 10 years before China will take Taiwan and do for it what they are doing to Hong Kong.

      I wish there was a multi-choice voting system to mark this post as insightful, funny and depressing.

    11. Re: They learned rhetoric from us by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Now if only the US and the Middle East would stop fighting over who's prophet of a sky god has a bigger nut sack, there might be hope for humanity.

      In case you somehow missed it, the Jews, Christians and Muslims all worship the same god. The Jews call him Yahweh, the Christians call him God, and the Muslims call him Allah, but they are all speaking of the same God.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    12. Re: They learned rhetoric from us by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Now if only the US and the Middle East would stop fighting over who's prophet of a sky god has a bigger nut sack, there might be hope for humanity.

      In case you somehow missed it, the Jews, Christians and Muslims all worship the same god. The Jews call him Yahweh, the Christians call him God, and the Muslims call him Allah, but they are all speaking of the same God.

      Most of them, of course, worship the same god, His name is Lucre.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  3. Sealab 2021 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're looking for me. You better check under the sea. Because that is where I'll be underneath the SEAAAAAA LAAAAAAAB Underneath the waaaaater SEAAAAAA LAAAAAAAB at the botom of the seaaaaa!

    1. Re:Sealab 2021 by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Funny... when heard of this underwater sea lab, the first thing that I thought about was Octonauts.

      So, who's going the be the Chinese equivalent of Captain Barnacle?

    2. Re:Sealab 2021 by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

      Im already ready to go beat the shit out of those fuckers from Pod 6. FUCK POD 6

    3. Re:Sealab 2021 by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I was thinking SeaQuest DSV (the first season, before it got all weird and messed up). And also SeaLab.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Sealab 2021 by bkmoore · · Score: 1

      So, who's going the be the Chinese equivalent of Captain Barnacle?

      "It's me and my crew and we've come for a screw!" said Barnacle Bill the Sailor.
      "It's me myself and nobody else!" said Barnacle Bill the Sailor.
      the rest is probably too dirty to post here.

    5. Re:Sealab 2021 by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      I was thinking SeaQuest DSV (the first season, before it got all weird and messed up). And also SeaLab.

      Isn't anybody going to mention Spongebob?

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  4. Will it be staffed by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Chinese sea men?

    1. Re:Will it be staffed by... by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      More details were requested, but ...

      China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation and the ministry did not reply to faxes seeking comment.

      No word on whether Bloomberg tried their BBS or AOL chat room.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  5. Good for China, and the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    we know less about the depths of our seas than the surface of the moon, it seems. This will benefit everyone. The rhetoric from the U.S is just hostile and war-mongering, and should be condemned.

    1. Re:Good for China, and the world by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Death to China!

      Trump 2016

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  6. Japan and the Philippines should build one, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These are international waters, open to exploration by ALL. This may just be a serious science project, but if it's not just that, the rest of the world needs to do the same. America is not perfect, but I would never, ever, EVER, trust the Chinese government to do ANYTHING for purely altruistic purposes - even for their own people. They get away with too much, already!

  7. Verrry Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Artificial islands on the surface, deep-sea facilities on the sea-floor...me thinks China might have found something extremely valuable in the South Sea. Something worth spending a huge amount of money to investigate.

    1. Re:Verrry Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Artificial islands on the surface, deep-sea facilities on the sea-floor...me thinks China might have found something extremely valuable in the South Sea. Something worth spending a huge amount of money to investigate.

      Oil.

    2. Re:Verrry Interesting... by confused+one · · Score: 2

      Or precious metals. My Precious...

    3. Re:Verrry Interesting... by wxxy___ · · Score: 1

      Laying claim to a fairly huge chunk of the globe, and asserting control of the shipping, is extremely valuable on its own.
      If anything is going to cause ww3, it's China militarizing and claiming ownership of the sea.

    4. Re:Verrry Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aliens!

    5. Re:Verrry Interesting... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      They are collecting Manganese Nodules.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    6. Re:Verrry Interesting... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Collecting? Almost certainly not - the only areas in the SCS that are this deep are relatively narrow trench zones, and most (by mass, or area of deposit) of the reserves of "manganese" nodules (other minerals and metals are present in the nodules) are on abyssal plains, not in the trenches.

      On the other hand, developing the technology to work at those depths - perhaps for controlling robots at short range, possibly using ultrasonic links instead of optical fibre (because ultrasonics tangles less than tethers of any sort) - is a plausible purpose behind such a development.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    7. Re:Verrry Interesting... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      You might want to click the link, it was a joke.

      Manganese nodules was the excuse the US government used to cover up the Glomar Explorer's real mission of recovering a soviet sub in the deep ocean.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    8. Re:Verrry Interesting... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      The link went to where I thought it meant. The CIA-HTC-Glomar boondoggle.

      The fact that that operation was somewhere in the grey area between fraud, "back operations" and milking foreign (American) tax payers for every penny they're worth does nothing to deny the fact that manganese nodules exist (first discoveries were on the UK's Challenger expedition in the 1870s to 80s), that they do have interesting chemistry, that they do exist in interesting quantities (though patchy in both abundance and contents), and that people are looking at the possibilities of exploiting them. Contracts were signed a couple of years ago for evaluation and possible exploitation of sites in the South-Central Pacific, and were discussed on Slashdot at the time. Don't you remember?

      You know, if I lived in a country that conducted a lot of trade with a potentially hostile country with whom I shared an ocean borderline, I'd take their actions quite seriously. Which is exactly what I do - living on the Atlantic coast of Europe.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    9. Re:Verrry Interesting... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I am with you on this. China is most definately trying to assert its dominance in the region. This has little to do with deep sea scientific research, therefore it is another Glomar Explorer, another attempt to cover up something clearly military/political in nature by stating it is for scientific research.

      You know, if I lived in a country that conducted a lot of trade with a potentially hostile country with whom I shared an ocean borderline, I'd take their actions quite seriously. Which is exactly what I do - living on the Atlantic coast of Europe.

      I fart in your general direction from Maryland. :P

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  8. Re: Japan and the Philippines should build one, to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not an underwater version of the international space station? Cooperative with shared costs and all parties can rest assured that it's purpose is not nefarious.

  9. Re: Japan and the Philippines should build one, to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not an underwater version of the international space station? Cooperative with shared costs and all parties can rest assured that it's purpose is not nefarious.

    yeaaaaah rrrrriiiiiight. difference is that space doesn't have a bunch of submarines carrying massive amounts of nukes. the under sea is very protected for a reason...

  10. Smells Fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anything at 9,000 feet would be pretty impressive. A massive sea lab at that depth is probably more than a little far fetched. That's beyond the crush depth of most nuclear powered submarines.

    1. Re:Smells Fishy by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's beyond the crush depth of most nuclear powered submarines.

      That's because most nuclear powered submarines are specifically not designed to have to withstand the pressure from being 3,000m underwater. You can't launch a missile from that far down, they only really need to be hidden from things on the surface and in the air (and stay quiet for other subs). There are plenty of other types of submarines which do go that deep because that's part of their design goal.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re: Smells Fishy by whopis · · Score: 1

      Being nuclear powered doesn't help with pressure resistance.

  11. we learned from the fake chinese moon landing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will be a fake sea lab, located within the deep blue zone of a polluted sea within perhaps 150ft of surface with plenty of PeeWee Herman Funhouse CGI and handshaking and backslapping for a Yob Well Done hurrd durr?

  12. Lotta pressure, anything could happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice sea lab you got there, it would be a shame if something were to happen to it. 4335.1492 ft per square inch, wouldn't take much...

    1. Re:Lotta pressure, anything could happen by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      4335 feet per square inch is an impressive compression ratio.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  13. Pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that around 300 atmospheres of pressure? Won't building something like that be expensive?

  14. Re:Japan and the Philippines should build one, too by Cramer · · Score: 1

    If they can build a habitable sphere that can withstand the 2ton/sq.in. at that depth, then more power to 'em. We have DSV that easily go that deep, but they're the size of a small car and carry the supplies to survive at most a day.

  15. Give this man a Neru suit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And tell him THE SPY WHO LOVED ME was *NOT* a documentary!!!

  16. Seabed by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    The only place that's not much messed up by men yet (besides MH370 and a few other vessels)

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  17. Re:Japan and the Philippines should build one, too by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    AC the US lined the oceans with its mil sound surveillance system back in ~ 1960's (SOSUS) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... so any mil precedent has long been set by the US to use the oceans for "anything" any nation wants.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  18. Watch out! by dark_requiem · · Score: 1

    If they succeed, they should be sure to take care when stocking the soda machine in the break room. Those things can be dangerous...

  19. Re:Japan and the Philippines should build one, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These are international waters, open to exploration by ALL. This may just be a serious science project, but if it's not just that, the rest of the world needs to do the same. China is not perfect, but I would never, ever, EVER, trust the American government to do ANYTHING for purely altruistic purposes - even for their own people. They get away with too much, already!

    FTFY

  20. The inevitable US response... by suupaabaka · · Score: 1

    Seaquest DSV.

  21. Re: Japan and the Philippines should build one, to by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Why not an underwater version of the international space station?"

    Do you mean a multinational research station that China is excluded from for no particular reason? Uhh, no.

  22. what year by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    will this Sealab be operational in 2020?

    1. Re:what year by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      and then in 2021 everyone goes insane and we get the first great Adult Swim cartoon series.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re: what year by whopis · · Score: 1

      But was it as good as "Chopper Dave"?

  23. another thousand square miles of national borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is how China owns the south China sea. They put undersea cities there.

  24. 1st? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was China's first science priority?

  25. Re:Japan and the Philippines should build one, too by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

    The US should totally build one.

    We cannot have a Sea Lab Gap!

  26. Re:Japan and the Philippines should build one, too by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    Undersea outposts were pretty thoroughly explored in the 1960s - at that time, there was no economically viable undersea pursuit worth pursuing.

    In other words: when you go underwater and stay there for long periods, you're essentially burning money. Fine if you want to park nuclear missiles off other people's shores, but otherwise not worth the effort.

  27. Where are the latest pix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a private security firm can find 'before' and 'after' pictures of an attack on an alleged Russian base inside Syria how come nobody can provide 'island' pictures to prove to us the existence of those islands?

    They keep on telling us China is building artificial islands, but all the while they give us OLD pictures

    Why can't they give us more recent pix of the so-called 'artificial islands', the ones they accuse China is building?

    I smell a freaking false flag

    1. Re:Where are the latest pix? by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      I don't know about "recent", but you can see Google's latest here.

      I may be mistaken (and please tell me if so) but that sure looks like a couple of dredge ships and floating pipes to build a new pile of dry land. Other Chinese-claimed islands show large piles of dirt and earth-moving equipment. One island does not appear quite so dry or quite so developed in older pictures.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  28. "frequency of typhoons" by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

    TFA says this is a danger. I could see this while building it, but would you even notice a typhoon happening if your 10,000 feet under, and anchored to the bedrock??

    1. Re:"frequency of typhoons" by caseih · · Score: 1

      I think earthquakes would be a danger. That much water pressure carrying a shock wave could be very destructive.

      Personally I doubt they will ever build it, so it probably would not matter.

    2. Re:"frequency of typhoons" by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      ohhh ouch, and if the lab shifted or had any breach...it would be filled with water / crushed within minutes. Our current tech is not strong enough to make this feasible.

  29. You guys are COWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think for a moment before you fall into the 'China building artificial islands and we must stop them' trap

    If there is a war, if indeed America fights China over the little islands in the South China Sea, you think Hillary gonna send her daughter to fight? You think Trump's son gonna volunteer to fight?

    Who do you think Washington DC will send to fight and die to 'uphold the dignity' of the the Vietnamese / Filipinos?

    Yes, it's gonna be your children, my children, all children of the 'working class'.

    Them elites will never sacrifice their own young. It will be our sons and daughters who will die.

    If the Vietnamese don't like the Chinese. Tough. Let them take on the Chinks their own way.

    If the Filipinos are so gung ho over the little islands in the South China Sea. Tough. Let them fight the Chinks themselves.

    Why should we get involved?

    Why should our sons and daughters be sent there to fight, to bleed, to die for foreigners who aren't willing to fight and die?

    Stop being a cow! Stop being fooled by the elites.

    1. Re:You guys are COWS by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

      First they came for the Vietnamese, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Vietnamese.
      Then they came for the Filipino, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Filipino.
      Then they came for the Malaysians, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Malaysian.
      Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

      Poetry aside, there is a good reason to be concerned about territorial expansion, especially when it's projecting military power uncomfortably close to neighbors. If it continues unchecked, then if or when a war does break out, the first fighting will be to capture that nearby territory in a powerful first strike. That eliminates potential allies for opponents, and concentrates the first counterattacks on liberating the conquered territory.

      That's how it worked in previous wars, at least. In a long-range modern war between superpowers, territorial expansion primarily serves as yet another target. It's another place for satellites to watch, another suspicious building, and another place that might hide another missile. Once the big powers break out their big weapons, it won't matter whose sons or daughters are in uniform. What will matter is who can keep their weapons operational long enough to fire at the enemy, and I doubt very much that anyone will care about "dignity".

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:You guys are COWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone have to die for the islands, it will be the Chinese, the Vietnamese, the Filipinos, the Malays, not the Americans.

      Until and unless Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton (plus the rest of the elite class) gladly volunteer their sons and daughters to fight and die against the Chinese half way around the world, just so we can 'uphold the dignities' of the Vietnamese, the Filipinos, the Malays, or whichever kind of local apes found in South East Asia.

      Until then, the government of United States of America has no right to demand the working class to surrender their sons and daughters to fight, to bleed and to die in wars that are thousands and thousands of miles away from our shores.

      The sons and daughters of working class Americans should no longer become cannon-fodder for the elites.

    3. Re:You guys are COWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bluaghawharaha agharhahahar ANGST ANGER OUTRAGE hear me roar arghshs1(eleven)!!!

    4. Re:You guys are COWS by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      First they came for the Vietnamese, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Vietnamese. Then they came for the Filipino, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Filipino. Then they came for the Malaysians, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Malaysian. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

      Poetry aside, there is a good reason to be concerned about territorial expansion, especially when it's projecting military power uncomfortably close to neighbors. If it continues unchecked, then if or when a war does break out, the first fighting will be to capture that nearby territory in a powerful first strike. That eliminates potential allies for opponents, and concentrates the first counterattacks on liberating the conquered territory.

      That's how it worked in previous wars, at least. In a long-range modern war between superpowers, territorial expansion primarily serves as yet another target. It's another place for satellites to watch, another suspicious building, and another place that might hide another missile. Once the big powers break out their big weapons, it won't matter whose sons or daughters are in uniform. What will matter is who can keep their weapons operational long enough to fire at the enemy, and I doubt very much that anyone will care about "dignity".

      As I recall, the US hasn't exactly been tolerant of, say, a nation getting friendly with the Russians, if it happened to be a large island 1,000 miles off our shores.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  30. Re:another thousand square miles of national borde by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Popular China, the cities live in you.

  31. Why can't you launch missile from deep sea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... You can't launch a missile from that far down ...

    Why can't you launch a missile from deep sea?

    Is it because of gravity? Pressure? Metal fatigue? Lack of technology?

    Or is it because they are Chinese, and Chinese are not supposed to be good for anything?

    1. Re:Why can't you launch missile from deep sea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Submarines must open compartment and equalize pressure to launch missiles, which isn't practical unless very close to the surface.

    2. Re:Why can't you launch missile from deep sea? by ytene · · Score: 1

      Launching a missile from a mile down doesn't depend upon specific performance requirements from the submarine [well, Ok, they are there, of course] but from the missile. If you launch from a mile down, then the missile has to have the internal strength and structural integrity to survive the pressure from that depth, all the way through it's ascent.

      I will now make an over-simplification, but you'll see the point: all of the additional structural integrity that the missile would require (for example to stop it's fuel containment tanks from being crushed, or it's warhead being damaged) would add a very significant mass to the rocket itself. So if you designed the entire rocket assembly to withstand that deep see pressure, it's mass at take-off would contain a much higher percentage of "structure" than with a conventional missile. This would lead to a massively reduced effective range, possibly lower speed-in-flight (making it easier to shoot down) and possibly reduced agility whilst airborne (impacting accuracy).

      One alternative might be to release a buoyant "missile container" from one mile down, then have pressure-sensing mechanisms within that assembly launch the missile once the assembly broke surface. Again, however, this seems to be making the whole process not only needlessly complicated, but adding a whole new set of componentry that can introduce the possibility of failure to the process.

      I'm actually entirely opposed to any form of nuclear armament myself, but reckon your idea won't float (sorry!) on technical grounds...

    3. Re: Why can't you launch missile from deep sea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny. Equalize pressure is trivial to achieve. Simply open a valve. The rocket itself will have issues to withstand the pressure.

    4. Re:Why can't you launch missile from deep sea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      multistage missile!

  32. Sniped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since TFA didn't give much except speculation about the base itself, I got nerd-sniped by big numbers and wikipedia.

    US's estimate of the oil-gas reserves in the area they're scouting-
    190 trillion ft^3 or about 1300 cubic miles of gas = 42 gigajoules
    11 billion bbl oil ~= 22 GJ.

    64GJ = a least a thousand tsar bombs or a hell of a lot of time traveling.

  33. How the World Court Deals With Sea Disputes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No country can unilaterally delimit another's 200 mile EEZ. For some interesting judgments and to gain an understanding as to how the world court deals with territorial sea disputes Google: "Falklands - Territorial Waters Academia"

  34. Re: Japan and the Philippines should build one, to by khallow · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do you mean a multinational research station that China is excluded from for no particular reason?

    The obvious rebuttal is the well-known Chinese government penchant for stealing technology. That's the particular reason.

  35. Re:Japan and the Philippines should build one, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And of course nothing could possibly have changed since the sixties. ;-)

  36. Re:Japan and the Philippines should build one, too by jandersen · · Score: 1

    These are international waters, open to exploration by ALL. This may just be a serious science project, but if it's not just that, the rest of the world needs to do the same. America is not perfect, but I would never, ever, EVER, trust the Chinese government to do ANYTHING for purely altruistic purposes - even for their own people. They get away with too much, already!

    Well, welcome to the other side of the fence - I'm glad you could join us. That is what many have been saying about America for many years; now you can see things from the outside. Sorry, I shouldn't gloat, it's just such pleasant feeling, as I'm sure you know.

    There is little doubt that this is a serious, scientific project, but no science is purely unpolitical; practising science in any form tends to influence your thinking and make you less tied up in things like national patriotism, religion etc - after all, as a scientist, you have to learn from and cooperate with scientists and other thinkers from all over the world. Also, science has the potential to increase the power of whoever knows the results; how can it not be political? Fortunately, most of science is open and international simply because it has to be - it is almost impossible to advance science, except in a very narrow set of subjects, if you work in isolation. Which is why we perhaps shouldn't fear China and their efforts as much - or America, for that matter: we all need each other. Instead, we should ask to join them, or take the initiative to set up a more international project and invite them in.

  37. Tibetan Tunnels by jandersen · · Score: 1

    As anyone who has studied the Truth about the World as revealed by Grand Master Terry Pratchett in Good Omens, where He reveals The Truth about the World, will know, the Tibetans have for millennia been digging tunnels all over the world. This is just another Sinister Plot to continue this, no doubt, by the Secret Masters in Shangri La, the very same people who are behind both the evil Chinese government, President Obama and Boris Johnson. It is time for the X-men to step in and rectify matters, one feels.

  38. Re: Japan and the Philippines should build one, to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A multinational research station where everyone keeps things for themselves? What's the point?
    Not to mention that they can't transport much stuff on re-entry and that the soviet union is allowed to have it's own place.

  39. Re: Japan and the Philippines should build one, to by khallow · · Score: 1

    A multinational research station where everyone keeps things for themselves?

    Both the US and the USSR do keep some things to themselves such as military technologies that have been repurposed to support the ISS (communication systems in particular). Also, it's hard to attract commercial interest in the ISS as a research platform, if they have to worry about ongoing Chinese espionage on the ISS itself.

  40. Re: Japan and the Philippines should build one, to by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    "The obvious rebuttal is the well-known Chinese government penchant for stealing technology. "

    If it's tech that we're not using, then I say let the Chinese run with it.

  41. Sovereignty by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    HA lol!

    This has about as much to do with scientific research as [insert something funny here].

    This is China. This is the South China Sea. This is about sovereignty. It is about establishing "use" and "continued presence" to extend national boarders or to strengthen their position in that regard. Which is ultimately about resources.

    This happens all the time internationally, though I'll admit this is the first time I've seen it occur as a underwater sealab! It does have the bonus that once in place there is very little anyone can really do about it.

    For a nicer way to do it see this:
    http://www.businessinsider.com...

    Canada and Denmark contest a barren speck of rock as territory, but it seems both military's at least have a sense of humour!

    1. Re:Sovereignty by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      HA lol!

      This has about as much to do with scientific research as [insert something funny here].

      This is China. This is the South China Sea. This is about sovereignty. It is about establishing "use" and "continued presence" to extend national boarders or to strengthen their position in that regard.

      Please. This is about thumping ones chest and making claims that will never pan out to make themselves look bigger. China has made claims to aircraft carriers, supersonic stealth jets, their own space station, missions to the Moon and Mars. As far as I can tell, they are mostly bluster with an unoperational Soviet carrier that still has to be towed, a photoshopped stealth jet, and no missions to anywhere significant. I'm not going to claim that they aren't making technological headway, or that they aren't capable, but as far as people saying "China has the vision and will to do what the US won't or can't", I'll pay attention when they actually start catching up instead of just announcing ambitious plans that sound just like things Bush said the US would do years back.

  42. Re: Japan and the Philippines should build one, to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no such thing as stealing technology. If I'm a cave man who figured out how to make fire, and the guy from the cave next watches and figures out my technique, I have not lost anything.

  43. the question is: by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    Is this base gonna be more like Starfish or
    preparation for Seveneves ?

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  44. Documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no SeaLab gap! As multiple documentary films demonstrate, a western SeaLab has been in operation for decades.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0278877/?ref_=nv_sr_1

    Also, we apparently have submarines that can do essentially anything.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106126/?ref_=nv_sr_1
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057798/?ref_=nv_sr_1
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0046672/?ref_=nv_sr_2

  45. Re: Japan and the Philippines should build one, to by khallow · · Score: 1

    If I'm a cave man who figured out how to make fire, and the guy from the cave next watches and figures out my technique, I have not lost anything.

    You lost any technological advantage you had from fire over that other caveman. If they're a member of your tribe, you'll probably come out ahead due to cooperation between you two. But if he's a member of a rival tribe, then you may die as a result.

  46. That's ambitious by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Just think about the engineering that'll have to go into something like that. I bet they'll make a lot of new discoveries. They'll also pay a price for it. Achievements like that don't come cheap, in money or men. One screwup at that depth and that's it.