Slashdot Mirror


Experimental Firefox Feature Lets You Use Multiple Identities While Surfing the Web (techcrunch.com)

Firefox web browser has a new experimental feature that allows a user to segregate their online identities and sign in into multiple mail or social media accounts side-by-side without having to use multiple browsers. From a TechCrunch report: This new "container tab" feature, which is now available in the unstable Nightly Firefox release channel, provides you with four default identities (personal, work, shopping, and banking) with their own stores for cookies, IndexedDB data store, local storage and caches. In practice, this means you can surf Amazon without ads for products you may have looked at following you around the web when you switch over to your work persona. As the Firefox team notes, the idea behind this feature isn't new, but nobody has figured out how to best present this new tool to users.

17 of 103 comments (clear)

  1. one minor adjustment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    As the Firefox team notes, the idea behind this feature isn't new, but nobody has figured out how to best present this new tool to users while maintaining the ability to track the user's online presence across all platforms .

    ftfy

    CAPTCHA: truest

  2. Simple by bazmail · · Score: 2

    Every window should be using a fresh cookie store/indexdb. All tabs on a particular window would share these. Remove ability to strip tabs out into new windows.
    No need to explain anything to grandma users etc whats happening. It just works.

    1. Re:Simple by dmomo · · Score: 2

      That would suck for people who use a multi-monitor workflow, or sites that legitimately make use of new-window / popups. Grandpa would sure have trouble grasping why it just DIDN'T work.

  3. Nice! by ADRA · · Score: 2

    Now I can troll on Slashdot without opening multiple browsers! This will increase my net comment trolling and 'cute animal liking' productivity at least 100%..

    --
    Bye!
  4. Why only 4? by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not a usability expert by any means, so can anyone tell me why only four identities?

    That seems pretty limiting to me, it should be the end user's choice how many identities to use.

    Why not something simple like each *window* have separate data that's shared between tabs? Then you don't have any UI changes or usability problems.

    Or is "it just works" an Apple patent or something?

  5. This has been needed for a long time by brwski · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cookies, etc., should never be able to see each other without permission. Let's hope this trend continues.

    --

    brwski
    "Because without beer, things do not seem to go as well''

  6. Tracking by tomhath · · Score: 2

    It would have made tracking you a bit more difficult. They must have finally worked it out with Google and Facebook.

  7. uMatrix by CrashNBrn · · Score: 3, Informative

    uMatrix (replacement for Ghostery, AdBlock|uBlock, etc) - blocks by default:

    All 3rd party cookies.
    All 3rd party scripts.
    All iFrames.

    1. Re:uMatrix by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      RequestPolicy Continued - blocks by default:

      Literally every 3rd party request, including images (e.g. tracking pixels).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  8. Re:Firefox profiles by TemporalBeing · · Score: 2

    (Firefox profiles) just use those.

    This is using the profiles, just differently and oriented around tabs instead of user-launched processes.

    --
    Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  9. Re: Firefox profiles by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why not just have a per-site identity? In other words, tracking cookies become worthless because they can't follow you from site to site. And then within each site, allow multiple identities if desired (think private browsing, only data is retained if you desire it.)

  10. Good News! by albinobluerhino · · Score: 2

    I'm very happy to see Firefox adding a good feature.

  11. Re: Firefox profiles by corychristison · · Score: 2

    In other words, tracking cookies become worthless because they can't follow you from site to site

    This effectively does that... just in a tab. Which is a lot easier for the average user to understand.

  12. Before Profiles by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Before FireFox had profiles, there was the MultiFox add-on. I used it. I liked it. It was easy to use. Unfortunately, Mozilla made a change that made it impossible for MultiFox to work, claiming the functionality was more properly implemented inside FireFox than as an add-on.

    Unfortunately, it's taken far too long for Mozilla to do it.

    --
    Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    1. Re:Before Profiles by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      Same here, now I can only have the private window before I have to open another browser.

      However I've found that plugins aren't properly isolated across profiles. For example if you have a normal and private window open and temp. allow a site in NoScript in one, the change takes effect in the other. Not good. A fix for this might be more useful than the container tabs.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  13. Privacy Badger by tiagosousa · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why not just have a per-site identity? In other words, tracking cookies become worthless because they can't follow you from site to site.

    You have, in effect, described EFF's Privacy Badger addon. It works heuristically to block cookies from leaking from their original domains, except when told otherwise (some exceptions are included by default -- so-called yellowlist, check out "How does Privacy Badger work?" section). I've been using it for some time and seems to work very well with little breakage. Rarely have to whitelist something.

  14. Re:Firefox needs to veer hard to privacy. by Vlijmen+Fileer · · Score: 2

    Precisely the only two things in your list that are actually great, not just visual candy, are I think available in Firefox now:
    - Bookmarks sidebar ctrl-b
    - History sidebar ctrl-h
    Using those all the time.