Slashdot Mirror


'Headphone Jacks Are the New Floppy Drives' (daringfireball.net)

According to the Wall Street Journal, Apple's upcoming iPhone won't have a 3.5mm headphone jack. The news has already upset many people. The Verge's Nilay Patel wrote on Tuesday that the decision of getting rid of the legacy headphone port is "user hostile and stupid." Apple commentator John Gruber makes a case for why Apple's supposed move is not a bad idea at all. He writes:Patel misses the bigger problem. It's not enforcement of DRM on audio playback. It's enforcement of the MFi Program for certifying hardware that uses the Lightning port. Right now any headphone maker in the world can make any headphones they want for the standard jack. Not so with the Lightning port.He adds that the existing analog headphone jack "is more costly in terms of depth than thickness," and by getting rid of it, Apple could use the extra real estate to stuff in more battery juice. Addressing Patel's point that the move of ditching a deeply established standard will "disproportionately impact accessibility," Gruber adds that "enabling, open, and democratizing" have never been high on Apple's list of priorities for external ports. Gruber also addressed Patel's argument that introducing a Lightning Port-enabled headphone feature will make Android and iPhone headphones incompatible. He wrote: Why would Apple care about headphone compatibility with Android? If Apple gave two shits about port compatibility with Android, iPhones would have Micro-USB ports. In 1998 people used floppy drives extensively for sneaker-netting files between Macs and PCs. That didn't stop Apple from dropping it.As for "nobody is asking" Apple to remove headphone jack from the next iPhone, Gruber reminds: This is how it goes. If it weren't for Apple we'd probably still be using computers with VGA and serial ports. The essence of Apple is that they make design decisions "no one asked for".The 3.5mm headphone jack has been around for decades. We can either live with it forever, or try doing something better instead. History suggests that OEMs from across the world quickly replicate Apple's move. Just the idea of Apple removing the headphone jack -- the rumor of which first began last year -- arguably played an instrumental role in some smartphones shipping without the legacy port this year. If this is a change that we really need, Apple is perhaps the best company to set the tone for it. Though, whether we really need to get rid of the headphone jack remains debatable.

6 of 771 comments (clear)

  1. Hilarious by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Funny

    All that bitching and moaning. You Apple fanboys just know that if Steve Jobs were still alive you would be lining up in the street for the new phone audio jack that only worked if you had to painfully shove it into your testicles at least every 5 minutes. Don't bitch about the monster company you helped create.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Hilarious by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, but the rest of us are going to tell you what you can do with your "selfie stick" instead.

  2. Re:Surface contact jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It turned out that you cannot patent using a magnet to hold something against something.

  3. Re:Have to give it to Apple..... by MitchDev · · Score: 5, Funny

    You only hate them SOMETIMES?

  4. Re:Save 1mm? by jandrese · · Score: 3, Funny

    How is Apple going to charge a tax on every peripheral manufacturer if they simply switch to a different open standard? How would they implement DRM on a 2.5mm jack? This solution solves only part of the problem for Apple.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  5. Tim didn't forget about Dre by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why would Apple make such a stupid anti-consumer change?

    Beats me.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff