Slashdot Mirror


Senate Report Says Charter, Time Warner Cable Overcharges Its Customers (broadcastingcable.com)

According to an investigation by a U.S. Senate, Charter and its new subsidiary Time Warner Cable have been overcharging customers at least $7.2 million per year for equipment and service. Time Warner Cable over-billed customers nationwide an estimated $639,948 between January and April period this year. This projects the sum to a yearly total of $1,919,844. Charter admitted that it overbilled its customers by "at least $442,691 per month." A report on BroadcastingCable states:The study found that "Time Warner Cable estimates that, in 2015, it overbilled 40,193 Ohio customers a total of $430,393 and 4,232 Missouri customers a total of $44,152," while "Charter estimates that it has annually overcharged approximately 5,897 Missouri customers a total of $494,000 each year. Charter does not provide service in Ohio." The report also said that Charter and Time Warner Cable have taken steps to correct the situation as a result of the investigation.

18 of 101 comments (clear)

  1. They overcharge by 100% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    They use their government approved monopoly to charge way, way more for something that should be a public utility and then keep all the profits that were supposed to upgrade the speed.

    1. Re:They overcharge by 100% by Bob_Who · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Corporations are not people, therefore crime is not criminal, and nobody goes to jail. They can steal with impunity, and when they pay their fines, that's just the kickback to the folks who grant them their monopoly. Lobbyists bought and paid for this contractual arrangement while we were voting for shills.

      Welcome to the pig fest.

    2. Re:They overcharge by 100% by tripleevenfall · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's one easy solution. Competition.

      Unfortunately, the cable companies own more than enough politicians to prevent that from happening.

  2. Of Course by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course Charter and TWC cheat their customers. Who else could they cheat?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Of Course by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Taxpayers when the build-outs are subsidized...

  3. quid pro ho by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    I'd like to see how much the senators on this committee received in donations from Comcast and AT&T. And not just to their own campaigns, but to super pacs too.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:quid pro ho by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Senator: "I am shocked—shocked—to find that cheating is going on in here!"
      Lobbyist: "Here is your cut, sir."
      Senator: "Oh, thank you very much."

    2. Re:quid pro ho by Dadoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd like to see how much the senators on this committee received in donations from Comcast and AT&T.

      Seriously. I'm a Charter customer, and while they're not perfect, I'm much happier with them than I ever was with Comcast.

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    3. Re:quid pro ho by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2

      I just switched from Verizon DSL to Comcast Xfinity 3 weeks ago, for Internet. Nothing but trouble. Granted, most of it appears to have been signal strength and yesterday a guy finally came out and changed out the tap, and my levels now look much better; but then today, everything, both Internet and TV crapped out, and when we called they tried to say it was our fault somehow because we just had a service call (??) A stern reminder that the service done was all outside the house (internal wiring and splitter are all new and done right) and suddenly 5 minutes later it's all working again.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  4. Re:It's to bad it's not like there is an other cho by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

    With good Internet there are lots of other choices. Not all are legal... But most are easier.

  5. Re:It's to bad it's not like there is an other cho by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Informative

    But to get that good internet in most places you need to buy it from the cable co.

  6. Re:The real news here by Moof123 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There should be a 10x penalty for billing errors, or some other type of real teeth.

    Inevitably this stuff leads to a fine that costs less than the infraction profited, and maybe a class action lawsuit that might resolve after several years with tiny vouchers for the class members.

    Short of campaign finance reform to cut out the root of the problem (lawmakers beholden to companies instead of the electorate) I don't see this or many other problems ever coming close to resolving.

    Monopolies in utilities like internet access should be regulated as monopolistic utilities.

  7. Re:Not the only ones... by Bob_Who · · Score: 2

    ....... It's always the same excuse... "A computer error"

    Because they meant what they said. Had you not noticed the overcharge, nor called, then the computer was working correctly. Its a game of customer against algorithm, and you won that point. But this game is like pong and really gets tedious for people. So that's why they do it. And we hate them even more.

    That's quality and commitment we can count on!

  8. Re:Not the only ones... by sid+crimson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It helps explain why companies want to go paperless, doesn't it? No US Postage Stamp means they haven't committed mail fraud.

  9. Re:The real news here by Mal-2 · · Score: 2

    The first time it happens, the company should have to pay it back with interest. If it was a mistake, that's fair, and it makes sure they don't benefit from it by sitting on the money even temporarily. The second time, they should have to pay double. The third time, triple. And so on. After some period of time without any significant "billing errors" in their favor, the meter gets reset back to "damages plus interest". (Say, two years for these jerks.) This would protect both legitimate business who do occasionally make mistakes, and their customers, while providing a disincentive to make "mistakes" for those who habitually do so.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  10. Re:It's to bad it's not like there is an other cho by macs4all · · Score: 2

    With good Internet there are lots of other choices. Not all are legal... But most are easier.

    Haven't seen ONE yet that approaches 1/10 of the ease of "pickup remote, Go to channel-guide, pick a channel, watch or record", sorry.

    We're SORT of getting there; but it's still WAAAAY too "techy" for average people. You and I can easily deal with it, but a LOT of "ordinary folks" (like the 99.99999999999% of the population who don't read Slashdot), um, just can't.

    That's not their fault, it's ours; for being to stuck-up and/or lazy and/or stupid to come up with a solution that works more like a "TV" and less like a "File Server". Voice Search stuff is helping get past the "typing/spelling" part; but something still isn't quite right to make it "click" (no pun) with the masses.

  11. Re:It's to bad it's not like there is an other cho by Immerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hulu, Netflix, etc are too difficult for normal people to use? Since when? It's a rare person who has trouble using a web browser these days.

    Now, if you want to watch shows on your big screen TV there's lots of cool techy options that are... almost completely gratuitous. Plug an old computer into the back of the TV, fire up the web browser, and watch away. Old laptops with plenty of power can be smaller, cheaper, and quieter than some cable boxes, to say nothing of things like the Raspberry Pi. And a small wireless keyboard and mouse make for a perfectly adequate remote... though I'd love to see a mouse designed specifically for the job, with at least extra buttons for volume, mute, pause, and on-screen keyboard activation. Not terribly difficult for a tech to set up, but there's no reason you couldn't make one that acted appropriately right out of the box.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  12. Re:It's to bad it's not like there is an other cho by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

    You don't even need a laptop. Get a Roku box and in minutes you can be watching Netflix, Hulu, etc. It's simple to do for people with little to no techy skills and is very inexpensive. (The priciest Roku is $100, IIRC.)

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.