.NET Core 1.0 Released, Now Officially Supported By Red Hat (arstechnica.com)

Microsoft on Monday announced the release of .NET Core, the open source .NET runtime platform. Finally! (It was first announced in 2014). The company also released ASP.NET Core 1.0, the open-source version of Microsoft's Web development stack. ArsTechnica reports:Microsoft picked an unusual venue to announce the release: the Red Hat Summit. One of the purposes of .NET Core was to make Linux and OS X into first-class supported platforms, with .NET developers able to reach Windows, OS X, Linux, and (with Xamarin) iOS and Android, too. At the summit today, Red Hat announced that this release would be actively supported by the company on Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comments

Not really ready for prime time

[Kupo]

I've been holding my breath for a long time for this, and it's pretty disappointing to have to say... This is really not ready for real use -- at least for most non-trivial use. For example, I can't easily get a MySQL connector to work, since it's meant for .NET 4.x and not Core. The majority of packages I use in my projects don't support Core. Obviously this takes time, and without Core being live, it would have less priority for package maintainers to actually support Core. That's understandable. But it's just hard to do anything useful with it, and as a developer, it's highly frustrating to not be able to do something that should be so fundamental like importing 3rd party packages. The new CLI toolset is a bit weird, and it's a few steps backwards of what they were proposing of being able to do, like save and reload (quickly) -- but I suppose that for now, I should just be celebrating that they're headed in the right direction... Maybe.

Re:new MS? nothings changed.

[RightSaidFred99]

It always amuses me how out of touch people on Slashdot are. Go look at a job site for .NET jobs, or web developer jobs and then come back and blather about "who still uses .NET LOL!". It's really kind of embarrassing for you to know so little about the real world.

Re:new MS? nothings changed.

[PmanAce]

What tech firms have over 100k+ employees that you worked for from startup? Google doesn't have those numbers, Apple either for example.

Re:new MS? nothings changed.

[Gr8Apes]

What tech firms have over 100k+ employees that you worked for from startup?

Reading comprehension 101:

I've worked for well over a dozen companies from startups to 100K+ employee tech firms

Restatement: They have worked for 12+ companies ranging from startups to 100K+ employee tech firms.

I have as well, multiple startups, several small to mid sized firms, and several 100K firms, although not solely focused on tech in my case. I can state that several .NET firms switched to Java. I have yet to see one switch to .NET, although I did see one firm with .NET employees trying to code in Java that didn't go as well as it might have, but they persevered, although they did have some employee turnover. And I have coded in both .NET and Java. Java is way easier to get a job in.