Slashdot Mirror


Activision Abuses DMCA To Take Knock Indie Game Entirely Off Steam

Reader He Who Has No Name writes: We've seen brain-dead, overzealous, and entirely over-automated DMCA takedown requests bring down music and videos, but this may be the first case of an entire video game being knocked out. Earlier today David Prassel, creator of Trek Industries and developer of the not-without-controversy ORION: Dino Horde / Prelude and the early-access Guardians of ORION, posted that his current project had been entirely removed from Steam after a questionable DMCA allegation from Activision. Prassel explains further, "We've made Steam our primary platform, but this has put a definite scare into us going forward considering our entire livelihood can be pulled without a moment's notice, without any warning or proper verification. I cannot even confirm that the representative from Activision is a real person as absolutely no results pop up in any of my searches." Image comparisons against at least two of the weapon models claimed to be infringing were posted by Prassel and in at least one thread on a forum.
What's more, it appears Activision is alleging not a vertex-for-vertex and texel-for-texel theft and duplication of the Call Of Duty: Black Ops 3 2D -- 3D art assets, but in fact an infringing artistic similarity and design of separately created art content -- something that the DMCA does not cover (and which more would likely fall under copyright or possibly trade dress). Since this takedown falls directly in the middle of the Steam Summer Sale -- which probably is not a coincidence -- it will profoundly impact Trek Industry's potential sales.
Polygon has more details.

33 of 147 comments (clear)

  1. "Artistic similarity"? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    Am I having hallucinations or do those weapons look nothing alike besides all four looking like military-ish rifles?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:"Artistic similarity"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah I was confused... a drum magazine versus a bullpup... different textures... maybe a computer artist can chime in with how one could look stolen from the other?

      The things they shared on the post are not the same that were reported, I was reading on reddit about this and there is a pretty good comparison of various assets as well as some history of the company, their shady business and other things they have done.

      http://i.imgur.com/ZQeBNGs.png
      https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/4q6xo5/activisions_dmca_claim_on_orion_is_legit_orions/

    2. Re:"Artistic similarity"? by Freedom+Bug · · Score: 4, Informative

      The top rail and sight assembly are identical, too identical to be a coincidence.

      But that's because they both copied from the M14.

    3. Re:"Artistic similarity"? by SharpFang · · Score: 2

      You're not hallucinating. The dev paired mismatched weapons on purpose.

      http://i.imgur.com/ZQeBNGs.png
      http://i.imgur.com/WCL4fCQ.png

      The guy copied sections of the model vertex for vertex.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    4. Re:"Artistic similarity"? by mindwhip · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ignore the textures which are mostly from the Unreal Engine base assets on the Orion guns.
      The Orion guns are made up of the same base components as the Activation guns but mixed/matched and are vertex for vertex copies. For instance Barrel from A and stock and sight from B. There are plenty of better comparisons with screenshot examples on the Steam blog/article's comments.

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    5. Re:"Artistic similarity"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When Activision rips off real-world guns for their games it's "innovative".
      When anyone else does it it's "copyright infringement".

    6. Re:"Artistic similarity"? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://imgur.com/a/O5Fj4

      It's a direct lift. Probably "vertex for vertex". Definitely a copyright violation.

    7. Re:"Artistic similarity"? by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, they all have triggers, stocks and barrels. Obviously they're a direct rip.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    8. Re:"Artistic similarity"? by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      > But that's because they both copied from the M14.

      I want to believe. This was my first thought too, but, in order to verify that, one more step is needed, find the real rail that looks like....I am not.

      What strikes me is the little flourishes. Look at the front of the rail by the sight, it has a stamp in the metal that looks like some sort of mechanical reinforcement, or decoration. They are nearly identical, yet, in all the images of M14s and their rails/sights I just don't see some of these details.

      It really looks like the game model was used as the reference, rather than a real gun.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    9. Re:"Artistic similarity"? by msauve · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "they both copied from the M14."

      You've obviously never even seen an M14.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  2. "QUOTE" By Warskull from reddit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    (Since this may influence your view on this)

    "Are we sure this is abuse? The dev behind Orion has a sordid history and a history of lying. I wouldn't put it past him to steal assets.

    Remember this is the guy who change his game's name three times to dodge badge metacritic scores. After getting $20K from kickstarter, he failed to pay his developers and then fired them all.

    He also has a history of stealing assets. He got caught stealing the armory model from NS2 (has since took down the videos and removed it), stole a T-Rex from Primal Carnage (and tweaked it a bit), and it was suspected weapon sounds were stolen from Counter-strike.

    This looks to be a legit use of the DMCA."

    1. Re:"QUOTE" By Warskull from reddit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know you look ridiculous announcing your emotional problems, then attacking Reddit over what a small-subset of users did, on a site as far gone as Slashdot is.

  3. manishs, can you please try to edit properly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hi, manishs! I know you're relatively new here, but can you please try to put some care into editing the submissions you post?

    The title for this one is obviously fucked up: "Activision Abuses DMCA To Take Knock Indie Game Entirely Off Steam".

    That should be either "to take" or "to knock", but not "to take knock".

    We don't have high expectations for the editing here, of course, but mistakes like this are bad even by the very low standards we hold Slashdot to.

    Please, try to be just slightly better than Timothy and the other former editors were. Please!

    1. Re:manishs, can you please try to edit properly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hi!

      Slashdot Administration here. Your suggestion has been considered, and rejected. Thank you for your time!

  4. Taken from reddit comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are we sure this is abuse? The dev behind Orion has a sordid history and a history of lying. I wouldn't put it past him to steal assets.
    Remember this is the guy who change his game's name three times to dodge badge metacritic scores. After getting $20K from kickstarter, he failed to pay his developers and then fired them all.
    He also has a history of stealing assets. He got caught stealing the armory model from NS2 (has since took down the videos and removed it), stole a T-Rex from Primal Carnage (and tweaked it a bit), and it was suspected weapon sounds were stolen from Counter-strike.

    Take a look at this:
    http://i.imgur.com/ZQeBNGs.png
    Direct copy of CoD assets, like it or not.

    1. Re:Taken from reddit comments by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Take a look at this:
      http://i.imgur.com/ZQeBNGs.png
      Direct copy of CoD assets, like it or not.

      That doesn't actually prove anything. After all, this is exactly the same as the one found in the game. But the models were redone by hand. You can even prove that by looking at the very basic information in nifskope. The only thing that image actually proves? It looks exactly the same, nothing more.

      Until the assets from both games are pulled and compared using 3DS, nifskope, maya and so on, this actually boils down to a whole lot of "he said/they said/etc." Even that thread on PCMR doesn't prove shit except they "look the same" and basing anything off that is fully useless. Since a modeller can make it look the same and have vastly different methods to create the same effect.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Taken from reddit comments by msauve · · Score: 2

      " it's just a knockoff of the top rail on an AR-15/M-16"

      You're being much, much, too blatant in the things you're making up. Anyone who can use Google can tell your claim is made of whole cloth.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:Taken from reddit comments by msauve · · Score: 2

      You apparently believe that if someone were to copy something by hand, it's not copyright infringement. You're wrong.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  5. Activision didn't abuse anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This content was STOLEN from activision by these dodgy crooks and polygon used the worst pics.
    Here are some better ones.

    https://np.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/4q62te/we_need_help_getting_the_word_out_activision/d4qnlgy?context=3

  6. Reddit Detectives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The PCMR subreddit seems pretty sure the DMCA claim was legit. The similarities shown in the thread are striking, to say the least.
    https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/4q6xo5/activisions_dmca_claim_on_orion_is_legit_orions/

  7. DMCA by msauve · · Score: 5, Informative

    "...something that the DMCA does not cover (and which more would likely fall under copyright..."

    Copyright is exactly what the DMCA covers. It is, after all, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The submitter seems very biased. There are comparison pictures on reddit (and now here) which clearly show infringing content.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:DMCA by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Informative

      Indeed. While some of the CoD assets were based on real-life items, they were also clearly created specifically for that game since they had various embellishments and details unique to that game (as one of the examples floating around suggests, in much the same way that AK-47s look different in different games)...which were meticulously reproduced in Orion's models, even if they covered them up with different textures.

      Moreover, it sounds like Orion's developer has a history of copyright infringement. For instance, the reddit post that's blowing up links to a a set of examples of plagiaraized artwork used for achievement images in one of their other games (in fact, it may be the game they renamed and re-released, allegedly so that they could dodge the bad scores the game had on Metacritic and trick people into buying it again). And after the developer created an Indiegogo campaign with a goal of $500 to help cover their legal fees and whatnot for this DMCA takedown, the first "donation" was $500 from the developer themselves.

      Everything about this dev just smells fishy, and while I typically can't stand Activision as a company (nor have I ever had a desire to play any of their CoD games, let alone actually done so), I'm having trouble finding fault with them here. It sounds like this dev is ripping off their 3D art assets and slapping some new textures on them to try and call them their own. And it seems clear that they know they're in the wrong, since when they tried to defend their models as being their own, they didn't do the obvious thing someone who was innocent would do by posting like-for-life, side-by-side shots of both their model and CoD's asset so that we could all see that theirs was unique. Instead, they posed Activision's and their guns at wildly different angles, seemingly with the intent of obscuring the similarities that would be glaringly obvious if they had provided useful side-by-shots shots...as the side-by-side shots posted by others have demonstrated.

      That said, it does seem like there's some Activision shilling going on in the comments here too, what with all these ACs posting the same stuff over and over again. Not sure what to make of that, but regardless of any shilling, it doesn't change that at least from a layman's perspective, it looks like this dev lifted models from Activision, along with all of the embellishments and details that make them uniquely Activision's, and now they're being rightfully called out on it.

    2. Re:DMCA by msauve · · Score: 2

      "what with all these ACs posting the same stuff over and over again. Not sure what to make of that,"

      Could be as simple as people on Steam, or reddit, finding out about this discussion and not having accounts here. Regardless, if they're posting deliberately misleading info, they should be called out. If the info is accurate, what does it matter who posts it?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  8. So send counter-notice. "C" in DMCA by raymorris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > the DMCA does not cover (and which more would likely fall under copyright

    What does the author think the Digital Millenium COPYRIGHT Act covers, if not copyright?

    If the DMCA notice is wrong, the respondent should simply send a counter-notice and the game will go back online. Then Activision can decide if they want to sue in federal court. Reddit commentors who have looked into the facts say Activision is right.

  9. Silent homage is not copyright infringement by mark-t · · Score: 2

    I firmly believe in the merits of respecting copyright law, personally... but something is fundamentally broken when this kind of shit can happen.

    1. Re:Silent homage is not copyright infringement by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      From what I've seen on some of the pictures, the parts of the guns which are artistically similar but not identical are such because they were copied from a different model of the same game. There's not an original mesh in the entire gun, just a few of the colours on some of the textures have changed, but even some of those look like direct copy.

      It appears about as much of an artistically similar work as grabbing the Mona Lisa and running it through a photocopier. Given how simple it would be to make differences and how incredibly hard it would be to make the guns parts look that much alike I'm going to err with Activision here. Of course it helps that the Orion developers are incredible douchebags who've been court doing this as well as many other shady things over and over again.

  10. Re:What next? by PIBM · · Score: 3, Informative

    https://i.sli.mg/xpIy1W.png

    This one is pretty damning for Orion

  11. Re:What next? by mindwhip · · Score: 3, Informative

    IANAL but given my understanding of DMCA provisions:

    Most likely the chain of events is actually...
    1) Activision file DMCA with Steam
    2) Steam take game down
    3) TREK Industries file counter claim with Steam
    4) Steam under DMCA rules have done their part with the initial takedown and respect the counter claim and restore content.

    Next step is Activision have to file full court proceedings which will take a little time. Of course TREK have set themselves up for full on collapse if their counter claim is proven to be invalid or fraudulent but given the junk status their game already had I suspect its a cut and run situation for them. That is if Activision feel that the additional legal costs are worthwhile.

    --
    [The Universe] has gone offline.
  12. Re:Activision are right by msauve · · Score: 2
    "the DMCA filed was totally invalid as it didn't have required information."

    Why don't you provide a link to the notice, then explain what the hell you're talking about? From the Steam thread, the takedown notice included this:

    the game Orion uses weapon art content from Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 and Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare. The weapon art in question includes the M8A7 rifle, the Haymaker rifle, and the Bal-27 rifle.

    That's 99% of what's needed - to identify the infringing work, and the work which is being infringed. That was done. The rest is boilerplate - contact info, signature, etc. What are you claiming is missing?

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  13. Re:What next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This gif is good switching between the Orion and CoD model:

    http://i.imgur.com/pVDLi5L.gif

    I was ready to come down on their side, but after seeing the screenshots it clear they stole the asset, now they're lying and trying to play the victims.

    Takedown was legitimate. No sympathy.

  14. Re:What next? by jandrese · · Score: 2

    Are we going to also come down on Activision for also copying bits of real weapons?

    On the other hand, it's pretty hard for me to work up the energy to defend a derivative grey/brown shooter in 2016.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  15. Re:What next? by PIBM · · Score: 2

    It depends how badly they reused the meshes. I don`t have either game, nor the tools handy, but it could be easy to validate the mesh coordinates. If the number of vertex using the same (1e-4 difference) coordinate exceeds 5-10% and I`d have a hard time believing it was done manually and not copied. From the screenshots, I'd guess that it could be much higher than this.

  16. Re:What next? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I fail to understand why someone can claim copyright on loose details where both models are obviously based on a real-life weapon. This is idiocy.

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time