Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Kills Windows 10's Messaging Everywhere Texts, To Bolster Skype (pcworld.com)

Reader tripleevenfall writes: The ability to respond to text messages received on your phone with the same app on your PC. It's a dream that's been a reality for Mac users since 2014, and Windows 10 Mobile users were supposed to get the feature, called Messaging Everywhere, with the Anniversary Update rolling out August 2.
But that's not happening anymore. Instead, Microsoft thinks it has a better idea: add Messaging Everywhere to an upcoming version of Skype for Windows 10 PCs.
Microsoft commentator Brad Sams writes, "Skype barely works; let's add new features. Texting from your phone is cool, let's remove it. 0.0% people want this."

122 comments

  1. Hooray by tripleevenfall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More of the Skype mentality: Taking something that could be implemented simply and cleanly - and using it to drag you kicking and screaming into an larger application that you hate.

    Forget that "0.0% of people want this", as TFA states. We know what you want. We will help you want it.

    1. Re:Hooray by drew.kroft2490 · · Score: 0

      Trust Us. We're Microsoft

    2. Re:Hooray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust Us. We are Borg.

    3. Re:Hooray by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      More of the iTunes mentality: Taking something that could be implemented simply and cleanly - and using it to drag you kicking and screaming into an larger application that you hate.

      Forget that "0.0% of people want this", as TFA states. We know what you want. We will help you want it.

      FTFY.

      Years ago iTunes was a respectable music manager and player. Now it's a bloated mess of iGadget interfaces, iCloud updates, application storefront/maintenance, digital music store/downloader, digital movie store/downloader... I feel I missed 5-6 things.

    4. Re:Hooray by Dr_Terminus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't remember a time when iTunes was ever a respectable music manager and player. I remember trying it in the early days, but soon went back to just using WinAmp and organized folders in Explorer to play and manage my music... Unfortunately now with iDevices, I'm forced to use the abomination that is iTunes...

    5. Re:Hooray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can imagine that the people who were tricked into installing Windows 10 and then used Messaging Everywhere are a bit sour about having that taken away from them.
      Perhaps it is better to stay away from Windows 10 until the support time runs out. It sucks when a company tampers with software after you have installed it.

      The "We didn't want to maintain that feature anymore" mentality some companies have can quickly turn a computer useless to you.
      It sucks even more when it is hooked up to $100,000 worth of measuring equipment that relied on those features.

      Sometimes you just need to keep an old Windows 2000 box running.

    6. Re:Hooray by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      It was usable until semi-recently. Now it's just a mass of "buy this!" "cloud that!" mularkey

    7. Re:Hooray by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Everyone I've shown the video conference call feature of Google Hangouts has wanted to know how to get it working on their (Android) phone/tablet (you get it for free with Gmail). So it's not that 0.0% of people want this, it's that 0.0% of people want Skype as their platform for a lightweight function like text messaging.

      Incidentally, Hangouts was integrated into Gmail on the browser in 2013. It's one of the nice spin-offs from their abortive Google+ attempt. The only catch is that Google lets the user choose how they want to set it up, and by default it only shows Hangouts chats. You need to mess with the options before it'll show Hangouts + SMS on both your phone and your computer. (It still seems to miss MMS.)

    8. Re:Hooray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. This idea makes sense from the OPPOSITE view - a lightweight messaging app that integrates Skype messaging and Text Messaging. Something fast and lightweight - not something that seems to spend a lot of CPU rebuilding databases for no discernible reason, with loads of screen space being taken up for logos.

      But then it becomes 'part of the OS', the same way that iMessage is just part of iOS; rather than some big IN YOUR FACE LOGO that Microsoft paid THAT MUCH MONEY FOR.

    9. Re:Hooray by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      There was a brief burst of enthusiasm back in 2003 because the original 'support' for ipods on PCs was 'Musicmatch Jukebox'; a program so terrible that it made iTunes look like a blessing.

      I can't really think of any situations since then when iTunes has looked like the better option; but there was that one.

    10. Re:Hooray by youngone · · Score: 1

      'Musicmatch Jukebox'

      Holy moly! I was tricked into using that for a while. What an awful nightmare. I think it might have come with a Creative music player.

    11. Re:Hooray by TroII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can imagine that the people who were tricked into installing Windows 10 and then used Messaging Everywhere are a bit sour about having that taken away from them.

      Anyone running Windows 10 ought to get comfortable with the idea of things being taken away on a whim, and free things suddenly having a fee attached. Microsoft seems to have bet the empire on it.

    12. Re:Hooray by bondsbw · · Score: 2

      I can imagine that the people who fully understood what they were getting into by installing an insider (preview) build of Windows 10 and then used Messaging Everywhere understand that everything is subject to change before release.

      FTFY

      Besides, putting it in Skype means it could come to other platforms instead of being locked to Windows.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    13. Re: Hooray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait. Are you saying that when you copy some text from an IM you don't want the sender info, date, time, and othe junk?

    14. Re:Hooray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I started using MediaMonkey to manage my library and iDevices. Sure, I need iTunes installed for the drivers... but MM is actually pretty slick and worth the price of admission.

    15. Re:Hooray by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      With a new W10 laptop, I found that Minesweeper was now full-screen, and I was informed I could pay extra for an ad-free Minesweeper. Not even Minesweeper is safe.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  2. Useless Mac mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I still receive texts from AIM friends that I can text reply to or reply from my PC. AOL has had this feature in instant messenger since pre-2006. How about do some research instead of trying to act like Apple invented everything.

    1. Re:Useless Mac mention by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      What's AIM got to do with smartphones? This isn't about AIM/ICQ/etc, this is about smartphone/computer messaging.

    2. Re:Useless Mac mention by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No one said they invented it, but in terms of having it baked into an OS, rather than being a third-party feature (which, I'll add, oftentimes comes with weird issues such as the texts that originate in an IM client coming from unrecognized phone numbers), Mac is still the only one that does it. Windows was set to match, but now it's not.

    3. Re: Useless Mac mention by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      If Microsoft baked Skype into Windows like Apple does with their messqging the shrieking would be unbearable.

    4. Re: Useless Mac mention by friedmud · · Score: 2

      That's because OSX Messages is a simple, purposeful app that works as designed and Skype is a bloated mess...

    5. Re:Useless Mac mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats the difference? Both are methods for sending a short text based message to another user, utilizing the internet as the delivery method.

    6. Re:Useless Mac mention by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      What's AIM got to do with smartphones? This isn't about AIM/ICQ/etc, this is about smartphone/computer messaging.

      Oh - from the posts I thought it was how iTunes was a piece of shit, and Apple sucks.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re: Useless Mac mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They tried that a'la Windows messenger in XP. It was the first thing everyone disabled.

    8. Re:Useless Mac mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yes that is true. But this is about smartphone/computer messaging.

    9. Re:Useless Mac mention by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Well yes that is true. But this is about smartphone/computer messaging.

      And you'll have it on your superior Windows phones. Just have to follow Microsoft 's rules.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  3. M$ Becoming Like Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Developing an deploying features that nobody wants......

    Having M$ disable this feature is like having an Apple iPhone without a standard headphone jack.

    1. Re:M$ Becoming Like Apple by tripleevenfall · · Score: 0

      Developing an deploying features that nobody wants......

      Having M$ disable this feature is like having an Apple iPhone without a standard headphone jack.

      Apple's hardware decisions are not the same thing as MS removing useful OS features in order to force people to use an application they hate.

    2. Re:M$ Becoming Like Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Luckily, the number of people using Windows 10 mobile phones is rapidly approaching 0, so it's not like Microsoft is actually forcing anyone to do anything.

    3. Re: M$ Becoming Like Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Apple's move is much more damaging and ridiculous.

    4. Re:M$ Becoming Like Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Developing an deploying features that nobody wants......

      Having M$ disable this feature is like having an Apple iPhone without a standard headphone jack.

      Apple's hardware decisions are not the same thing as MS removing useful OS features in order to force people to use an application they hate.

      It's like moving functionality from your iPhone into iTunes. That's a far worse piece of software than Skype.

    5. Re:M$ Becoming Like Apple by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Developing an deploying features that nobody wants......

      Having M$ disable this feature is like having an Apple iPhone without a standard headphone jack.

      Captain ridiculous coomparison called and said that comparison was insane.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  4. " 0.0% people want this." by Pope+Raymond+Lama · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It should read "from the 1.0% people using WIndows on Phones, 0.0% want this" is like: who freaking cares?
    This is news about how to set the corpse's arms inside the coffin!

    --
    -><- no .sig is good sig.
    1. Re:" 0.0% people want this." by bmk67 · · Score: 1

      It should read "from both people using WIndows on Phones, 0.0% want this"

      FTFY

    2. Re:" 0.0% people want this." by JediJorgie · · Score: 2

      LOL.. Read again... this feature lets you send/receive SMS on Windows 10 on your computer by linking with Cortana on your phone... works just fine with my Android phone. This has nothing to do with Windows 10 Mobile.

    3. Re:" 0.0% people want this." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is news about how to set the corpse's arms inside the coffin!

      Did it just get dark in here?

    4. Re:" 0.0% people want this." by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      I reread it multiple times.

      From the image shown on the tweet (emphasis added):

      We have been testing with WIndows Insiders a preview of the "Messaging Everwhere" feature that allows you to receive and send text messages from your Windows 10 phone directly to and from your Windows 10 PC. ...
      The ability to reply to text messages on your PC using Cortana is unaffected

      So what this actually means I have no idea. I have zero interests in texting using any MSFT product, be it a WIndows Phone, Cortana, Messaging Everywhere, or Skype.

    5. Re: " 0.0% people want this." by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I have zero interest in texting with any product. I would prefer an untexting feature. So when the person in front of me at the green stoplight is still texting, the app on my phone would interrupt their texting.

    6. Re:" 0.0% people want this." by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It should read "from both people using WIndows on Phones, 0.0% want this"

      FTFY

      Although if they talk one into wanting it, the number will increase dramatically.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re: " 0.0% people want this." by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I have zero interest in texting with any product.

      Well why didn't you say so earlier, and texting wouldn't even have been invented?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  5. Dumpster Fire by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm guessing Microsoft is doing this to get more people to use Skype. Obviously they have no idea why people don't like it. They need to stop adding features and rebranding and make the thing usable again. As it stands, it's just a cluster of various projects haphazardly bundled together. This will only make the problem worse.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:Dumpster Fire by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      But from a marketing point of view, it's the right thing to do! Now you only need to make it not suck. That can't be hard, right?

      Signed,
      Microsoft marketing department

    2. Re:Dumpster Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that Skype is lightyears beyond the steaming pile of crap that is Skype for Business (Formerly Lync).

      Seriously, it's 2016 and Skype for Business can't deliver a message to more than one device? Between my work PC, my home PC that is running Skype for Business, and my phone that has Skype for Business installed, it will randomly pick one of those endpoints to send incoming messages to, and won't even alert the other endpoints that a message was received. Not to mention how many times it will just completely fail to send a message (Then put a little tiny error message inline in the conversation, that you don't see for hours later until you go back to the conversation to see why the other person never responded), or pop up a toast notification that you have a new message, then that message just fails to appear on ANY endpoint. Skype for Business can suck it long and hard.

    3. Re:Dumpster Fire by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Skype ("original", or "not for business" or whatever) is also going backwards in similiar ways, at least for us Linux folks. There has been no development on the Linux client for two years.

      Even though "Microsoft Loves Linux" it doesn't seem to extend to their properties like Skype.

    4. Re:Dumpster Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Lync at work (I still use the Lync 2010 client, even). I have a Windows 10 Mobile phone. Both are great.

      I never used Skype before Microsoft owned it. I don't use Skype now. I don't have any use for video conversations. I have plenty of need for a decent SIP client, though. And one that isn't laced with ads would be extremely welcome. One that comes installed by default with my OS. One that has support and continues to be improved. So when I saw the "Phone" app on Windows 10, I thought I had it made. WRONG. It's basically just a Skype launcher. Dumbasses. If I wanted to use Skype, I'd fucking use Skype. An app called "Phone" should be A GODDAMNED PHONE.

      Fuck Skype.

    5. Re:Dumpster Fire by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm guessing Microsoft is doing this to get more people to use Skype.

      Coming soon to a popup notification on your windows desktop:

      "Do you not want to not install Skype to not take over all your conversations you don't not want to not receive?

      Select Yes to install. Select Cancel to skip not installing. X to being install now."

    6. Re:Dumpster Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But from a marketing point of view, it's the right thing to do! Now you only need to make it not suck. That can't be hard, right?
      Signed,
      Microsoft marketing department

      No, that's the dev response.

      The marketing response is "Force the unwanted update on them, then have tech 'journalists' write about how adoption of Skype is growing at a hundred million units this quarter!" just like they did for the Win10 stats.

    7. Re:Dumpster Fire by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Feature frozen, bug fixes take months for the most trivial things. I'm guessing their Skype for Linux team is one man, working part time.

    8. Re:Dumpster Fire by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that Skype is lightyears beyond the steaming pile of crap that is Skype for Business (Formerly Lync).

      That's exactly my point. They are just rebranding and bundling software under the Skype umbrella. They need a well thought out set of products.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    9. Re:Dumpster Fire by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      But from a marketing point of view, it's the right thing to do! Now you only need to make it not suck. That can't be hard, right?

      Signed, Microsoft marketing department

      It is just like a nationwide wireless network. How hard can it be to not put up wires?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    10. Re:Dumpster Fire by matbury · · Score: 1

      Feature frozen, bug fixes take months for the most trivial things. I'm guessing their Skype for Linux team is one man, working part time...

      ...and has been on paid leave for two years.

    11. Re:Dumpster Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you have a poorly implemented product. Don't have that issue and it will send to multiple devices at once. Take it up with your shitty IT staff and if you implemented it, then fix it. You did it wrong.

    12. Re:Dumpster Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Lync (the 2010 or 2013 version, whatever...) was not half bad. But the 2016 version - what a step backwards. Even more horrible UI ("let's have chat windows with a gigantic minimum size so you can't resize them", WTF?), unstable, crash-prone, unreliable, activating features you really don't want and just generally unusable. And this being a fucking chat client, how hard can it be to get that to work in 2016? No opting out of it at work, though so I'm stuck with it and its million bugs.

      I'm probably stupid for thinking this, but to me it looked like MS had turned around when they released Win7 and they were really growing on me after many years of hating them. But the last year or two, they've really taken a gigantic dump on every small thing that they actually did well and their "fuck the customer" slogan isn't helping much either.

  6. What's actually going on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does Microsoft have such an obsessive hard-on for Skype? Why can't it build a messaging system that's open and integrates with others, and build it into the Windows platform rather than with some agonisingly heavyweight apps that need updating every week. The Android port takes about 20 seconds to start up on my 2 year old phone - and it wasn't nearly this bad a few years ago, even though it has the same feature set. What has made programmers of the biggest companies so fucking stupid, please? As an academic, I need to understand what goes on in the commercial mindset.

    1. Re:What's actually going on? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Interesting

      http://www.wired.com/2011/05/m...

      You spend 8 1/2 BILLION dollars on something,That is why you have a hardon for Skype.

      In simple terms, they want Skype to do things, they can then monetize. They are idiots, and users are starting to leave Skype for other apps, like Hangouts, Slack and Telegram because Skype sucks donkey balls.

      The problem for Microsoft is, they think they can bully people into their way of doing things, when the reality is that there are more reasons now than ever to avoid using MS crap.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:What's actually going on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not the fault of the programmers. The programmers could do a radically better job, and I would even guess they'd prefer to.

      You can't lay this blame at their feet. Look instead to the ones giving the marching orders: marketing and "business" people who believe that manipulating customers, vendor-lock-in, and closed protocols are the way to make money. And look even more to those customers who prove them correct.

    3. Re:What's actually going on? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's not just about monetizing Skype. It's about promoting other products with exclusive features. Notice this new feature is Windows 10 only. Why? There's no technical reason it can't be done on Windows 7 or 8. They just want to give people another reason to move to 10.

    4. Re:What's actually going on? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1, Insightful
      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    5. Re:What's actually going on? by TroII · · Score: 1

      Why does Microsoft have such an obsessive hard-on for Skype?

      I'm sure it has nothing at all to do with Skype's longstanding status as the NSA's wet dream [pdf warning].

    6. Re:What's actually going on? by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      Does Apple bring new features to OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, or to iPhone OS 3? Does Google bring new features to Android 1.x, or how about Chrome 2.0?

      Because those are the same as expecting Windows 7, released in 2009, to get new features 7 years later.

      Besides, this article is about bringing a Windows 10 exclusive feature to an app that is cross platform. I don't think that it's confirmed that this feature is cross platform but it's certainly more plausible now than before.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    7. Re:What's actually going on? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Skype is not part of the OS. It's an application.

    8. Re: What's actually going on? by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      Which was the point of my last paragraph.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  7. iMessage across devices is actually useful by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My wife has taken over the laptop, and she messages me a lot from the laptop. She'll be on some webpage and then send texts and things from a full keyboard.

    If i have a phone, i have SMS. If I have a phone, i may or may not have Skype. If I actually had an MS Phone, this becomes a non-feature for me, and I'm pissed that MS decides to play these games.

    1. Re:iMessage across devices is actually useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it's worth,
      people who do this with iMessage are why
      my phone has a special notification
      setting that plays no sound
      and doesn't vibrate.

      Then they wonder
      why I don't answer their
      messages immediately
      because they know
      they make it buzz a lot
      by typing more lines.

      "Oh there you are,
      I put this gold star
      that I give out to kids
      in my class
      on my macbook.
      I'm such a dork!"

      Rarely do people stop when I tell them it is really disruptive. This is a technology that when used for good is superb, but is more often used for annoyance.

    2. Re: iMessage across devices is actually useful by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It's Microsoft's fault that there is no iMessage client for Windows Phone?

    3. Re:iMessage across devices is actually useful by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      FWIW, Google Hangouts handles this sort of thing quite well. You can message from the app on iOS/Android, or gmail in a browser on any platform.

      Really, this is just MS being a day late and dollar short. Something they probably have a patent on the procedure for.

    4. Re:iMessage across devices is actually useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do the same with whatsapp web on any computer with a recent browser and with any device supported by whatsapp.

      Of course it's controlled by zuckenbuck, but apple isn't any better.

    5. Re:iMessage across devices is actually useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rarely do people stop when I tell them it is really disruptive. This is a technology that when used for good is superb, but is more often used for annoyance.

      You do realize that you can use OS X/macOS' "Do Not Disturb" setting for exactly that purpose, right?

    6. Re:iMessage across devices is actually useful by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      My wife has taken over the laptop, and she messages me a lot from the laptop. She'll be on some webpage and then send texts and things from a full keyboard.

      If i have a phone, i have SMS. If I have a phone, i may or may not have Skype. If I actually had an MS Phone, this becomes a non-feature for me, and I'm pissed that MS decides to play these games.

      If I have a phone I most definitely don't have Skype installed on it; I found it impossible to turn Skype off on my phone. Even if I sign out from it, when a Skype message arrives somehow Skype on the phone turns itself on again. Very very annoying and the only way I found to fix it is to remove Skype from the phone completely.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    7. Re: iMessage across devices is actually useful by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It's Microsoft's fault that there is no iMessage client for Windows Phone?

      Probably. It's asshattery to not.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:iMessage across devices is actually useful by jrumney · · Score: 2

      It's convenient, but it is also a security risk. My bank, credit card company and an increasing number of websites are using SMS to send an OTP to authorize online transactions. If this OTP is automatically going out to my PC, it is one more vector that an attacker is able to use to access my money (and probably the weakest link in the chain if it is a Windows PC).

    9. Re:iMessage across devices is actually useful by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      My wife has taken over the laptop, and she messages me a lot from the laptop.

      So MS dropping this is win win for you :D

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    10. Re:iMessage across devices is actually useful by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      for me, this is iMessage to iMessage, SMS doesn't get involved in it.

      Yes, you can also have Continuity send SMS to your desktop if they're close. But we don't do this, partly for this reason, partly because we get SMS messages more for notifications that we don't want to clutter up our laptop iMessage feed.

    11. Re: iMessage across devices is actually useful by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      No. It's Microsoft's part for saying they'd do something this useful (sigh, a different walled garden though) and instead dropping it for something nobody wants.

    12. Re:iMessage across devices is actually useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, Google Hangouts handles this sort of thing quite well.

      It doesn't, because it's more of the same bullshit lock-in as iMessage and Skype. All of these messaging networks require that a user have a specific brand of phone, install an app, and setup an account in order to use them, so you can't just assume that somebody can receive a message.

      Barring a user specifically disabling SMS on their phone, every phone can communicate with SMS without making any special provisions.

    13. Re:iMessage across devices is actually useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it makes entirely too much sense right? But as usual Microsoft is oblivious to the obvious.

  8. It *IS* a better idea. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Of course it is a better idea. Definitely. Better for Microsoft. At least according to its bean counters and Microsoft's Unified Supreme Strategic Realignment council.

    Is it better for the users? Who cares? May be some linux user would care, "one more opportunity to pile on and make fun of the misfortunes of poor people stuck with Microsoft". Other than that ...

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  9. Stuff I hate about Skype by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

    I use Skype a lot but it can be very annoying sometimes

    - Having an IM discussion that is replicated to my other Skype devices as unread messages. The annoyance is furthered by having all these unread messages show up as unread text messages on Windows mobile. This always causes me to panic for half a second when I see 40 unread text messages when I look at my phone.
    - No easy way to mark unread messages as read in the desktop client. You have to click on the person's contact record and open the chat history... dumb!
    - Browser integration. I disable this immediately. Why would you assume that I want to use Skype to call random numbers on a web page? Seriously... does anyone find this feature useful?
    - kitchen-sink approach to software development... This is classic MS... create a huge monolithic app that does everything and nothing particularly well.
    - No IM API for 3rd party chat client integration. TBF, no major chat client really allows this anymore (except FB I guess, but how long until that goes away too?)
    - No cross compatibility between their Skype for Business (Lync) and Skype clients. If you are going to use the same product names, make them interoperable... it is too confusing otherwise...

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    1. Re:Stuff I hate about Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pretty much the things I hated too.

      On top of that, I was one of the bunch of people shafted since version 5.
      Version 5 forced that video interface on everyone whether you used video-chat or not.
      They got rid of the standard interface, you know, that one you see when a call ends, the typical window-controls style.

      With this came inconsistent crashing if anything is even remotely active. (like, 40%+ CPU usage on average)
      You can see Skype trying to draw to an uninitialized video control just a few seconds before it took down the whole OS with it. (not even just the video driver!)
      They ignored anyone posting about this on their shit tracker.
      Happened on all kinds of OSes, processors and graphics cards, seemingly no correlation besides the active processor usage.
      I think Microsoft might have fixed it. Their MSN video-chat was at least not shitty and crashy.

      During that time though, most of my friend group just stopped using Skype entirely and bought a server and installed Mumble.
      The minor cost every month more than makes up for not having to deal with their shit developers that haven't heard of using a simple try-catch methodology to prevent such things like this.
      Plus, we added some useful features since we control the server, a file host and such.

      Fuck Skype.
      Googles Hangouts inconsistently worked at best of times during that period so we never waited until they fixed whatever nonsense they had going on.
      I hear it works a lot better now though. Oh well, too late.

    2. Re:Stuff I hate about Skype by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      - Browser integration. I disable this immediately. Why would you assume that I want to use Skype to call random numbers on a web page? Seriously... does anyone find this feature useful?

      I do. I find it very useful. I find it useful on my phone and on my PC. ...

      But then I do use my PC as my main desk phone at work due to recent changes in policy, so not really a common scenario.

    3. Re:Stuff I hate about Skype by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      - No cross compatibility between their Skype for Business (Lync) and Skype clients. If you are going to use the same product names, make them interoperable... it is too confusing otherwise...

      To be fair, it sounds like one of the main reasons for the existence of Skype for Business is that you don't have access to everybody on the "normal" Skype network.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    4. Re:Stuff I hate about Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No IM API for 3rd party chat client integration. TBF, no major chat client really allows this anymore (except FB I guess, but how long until that goes away too?)

      Off topic but AIM still allows 3rd party clients on both desktop and mobile. If only there was a Pidgin client for Android!

  10. Google Voice by darkain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Google Voice anyone? Sending/receiving texts from every device since the beginning of time! Plus voice mailing and calling, too.

    1. Re:Google Voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the same Google Voice that's only available in a handful of countries?

    2. Re:Google Voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. It's a great alternative to Skype, which is only available in a handful of countries.

    3. Re:Google Voice by JohnStock · · Score: 1

      You can't say that, because the Apple reality distortion field might get disrupted.

  11. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just put Air Droid on my phone and log into web.airdroid.com on my laptop. There you go, all the texts I want.

  12. The "dream" was available from Google first by mamono · · Score: 1

    I've had that "dream" be a reality since I've been on Google Voice for at least eight years. I'm sure that Microsoft phone users could still retain this ability by using Hangouts and/or Google Voice.

    1. Re:The "dream" was available from Google first by Jhon · · Score: 1

      I haven't been able to use anything other that web hangouts with a windows phone -- and that with difficulty.

  13. Hangouts? by alzoron · · Score: 1

    Google Hangouts works on Android, IOS, Mac OS, Windows, Linux and whatever else you can run desktop Chrome on. The only odd man out is Windows Phone due to lack of cooperation from Microsoft.

    1. Re:Hangouts? by kruug · · Score: 1

      More like Google not bringing their apps to Windows Mobile, and killing off third-party apps that attempt to use their open API.

    2. Re:Hangouts? by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      Why should Google waste their developer time on an adversarial prick of a company with less than 2%, and dive bombing mobile platform? Remember scroogled, fairsearch.org and the android tax? What would google benefit by bringing their apps to help out Win Mobile?

    3. Re:Hangouts? by kruug · · Score: 1

      Why should Google waste their legal department's time getting apps taken off the Windows Store? As much as I love Android, I'm forced to use Windows Phone for work. After seeing how Google plays nice with Apple, but not Microsoft, I'm not even sure I can support Google anymore... If they don't want 3rd party apps out there for their services, they should be taking it down on all 3 platforms, not just Windows Mobile. If they don't want to make 1st party apps for a platform, that's their prerogative, but if they claim to have an open API, they need to allow apps to be made, even if they don't like the platform they're being made for.

  14. Good ole Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One can no doubt rely on them to do something at the same time stupid and annoying to its customers. Which they can get get away with where they have a monopoly. Where they don't - Windows on the phone.

  15. Is that an error or a misprint? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    To Bolster Skype?

    Surely you mean that Microsoft is actually doing this to bolder Google Hangouts Video?

    That is what I started using when Skype was acquired by Microsoft. Skype support on Linux was already 2nd rate. Hangouts has first class video call support on Linux, Android and other platforms I use.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  16. MS only survives where it has a monopoly by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    They never had to deal with real competition and hence have no idea how to do it. So they keep buying stuff that works, weigh it down with useless crap and wonder why it sinks.

    Another company that only survives 'cause of its monopoly position. In a real economy they'd die off so fast...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:MS only survives where it has a monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not entirely true, by spending more money than they're likely to ever get back they bought a decent position in the console gaming market. Of course, it helped a lot that the Xbox 360 was easier to develop for than the PS3. Now that their current gen console is close to equivalent with Sony's they're falling behind, but they're a solid second and profitable, if you write off the pile they sunk into the original Xbox.

    2. Re:MS only survives where it has a monopoly by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Another company that only survives 'cause of its monopoly position. In a real economy they'd die off so fast...

      In the real economy they survive just fine. It's only in the fantasies of economists where they won't.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  17. SOP Microsoft screws up a purchased app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What surprises me is that people are still surprised by this. Especially from Microsoft. Microsoft is in the news everyday screwing something up and every day people are like "OMG MS is doing this bad thing, how unusual". Open your eyes, go linux.

  18. Is Skype still a thing? by stevez67 · · Score: 2

    I thought Skype died about the same time as Google+

  19. Skype is a disaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Skype looks like an application from 15 years ago.

    I'm not sure what they're going for, but apps like LINE which feature video, phone calls, groups and text chat are currently running circles around Skype.

    Microsoft needs to fire everyone who has had a finger in the godawful Skype UI and hire some people who were born after 1990.

    And I say that as a 50 year old.

    1. Re:Skype is a disaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate LINE. Typical asian app, tries to do everything.

    2. Re:Skype is a disaster by MercTech · · Score: 1

      When Skype was its own company; it was much more reliable. As to the interface; the one from ten years ago was much more functional. These days they want the application to look like your desktop computer is a giant phone screen taking over all the screen real estate to emphasize the lack of functionality. Windoes needs to consider putting the windows back in their OS.

      --
      NRRPT/RCT
  20. no one cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no one uses their phones anyway, their apps have always been shit, people use their os because its the standard, and their office suit because its the standard, and everything else sucks massive balls. for fuck sake, people even stoped using their browser, i remember when i stopped using their browser, i didnt even knew i had other options, and even then i found a way to abandon that shit, and more hilarious than that, their fucking video player, thats it, something that only had to open fucking videos, and people stoped using it and download ANYTHING else, because anything else works better, even their ancient mplayer2 hidden somewhere in the os worked better. Even their dvdburning tool sucks balls, i once burned a dvd with their tool, did not open the disc unless it was open in that computer, tried the other options to burn the disc, every single one, none worked, they are that bad
    I use skype, because its usable, at least the regular version, but i tried the app from the windows store, back in windows 8 days, it was horrendous, if i had to use that app instead of the regular desktop one i would be using something else, it would take me 2 minutes to look for an alternative
    Again, their shit is so crappy most reasonable people wont even try their apps, i know i will never try one of their apps, because i know it will suck. I havent tried windows 10, but i know a couple of things for sure, im not using anything from the store, and im not using any app from them that im not already using, which means, i will try to install skype desktop version, if it does not allow me to do it, i wont use their winstore app, im using any other app for that functionality just as i do with every other app, simple as that, im not using their mail app, their cloud stuff, im not creating a local account, im not using their media player, anything at all whatsoever, because their programs suck a very long and thick penis

    im going to be using their operating system because i want my games to fucking work, but im not touching all that crap that comes bundled with the operating system with a ten foot pole
    fuck them

  21. You can still send and receive SMS from desktop by kruug · · Score: 0

    Apparently tripleevenfall didn't read the entire article, especially where it says:
    "The good news is the end of Messaging Everywhere will not affect Cortana’s SMS integration that lets you send and receive text messages from your PC."

  22. BlackBerry Blend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've said it before, and I'll say it again... BlackBerry! BlackBerry Blend.
    http://us.blackberry.com/software/desktop/blackberry-blend.html

  23. Winamp... by Grog6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a WinNT 4.0 box with Winamp that I use to play music on; it's not networked, runs almost no power, and has almost permanent uptime.

    It's on an old Barton-core 2500MHz athlon that draws ~20 watts, IIRC.

    It's tied into the house A/V system, and runs from the same remote.

    I keep what works, while I look for something better. :)

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  24. Re:M$ Becoming Like Google by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    Heh, and how many times did Google change how they do SMS in Android / ChromeOS ?

    * SMS app
    * Buys Grand Central and allows people to use Google Voice for SMS via web and app (I still use this today, mostly)
    * Messages app
    * Hey, maybe SMS integration in Google+ ? Oh, wait, no one really uses it.
    * Hangouts app gets SMS integration on both web and app, and Google kinda starts deprecating all of the above.
    * Hangouts app loses SMS integration, now you should use the Messenger app
    * Oh, I guess people still use Google Voice, I suppose we might start maintaining it again until we decide to kill it for good.

  25. There is some high level idiot exec at Microsoft by Rainwulf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Running around with his fingers in his ears, going "LA LA LA LA LA I CANT HEAR YOU" when people say to him "you are making stupid decisions, alienating your user base and generally fucking about in a bad way'

    Its like.. they forgot their core business, and now all they care about is shitty little apps making money.

    They cant even get the app store in windows 10 working properly and it breaks at every opportunity that requires a windows re-installation all because they don't even bother testing their patches. Skype barely works, they still haven't fixed its terrible user interface and the difference between close, exit and quit. Office 2016 still uses the office 2007 control panel interface with its broken font scaling.

    Microsoft has utterly lost its shit. All they care about is the next micro feature in windows, while completely forgetting their entire microcosm is on the brink of falling to pieces.

    So their solution is to ignore what people are saying.
     

  26. In my country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... on your phone with the same app on your PC.

    In my country, telcos bundle the SMS gateway with their web services for subscribers. This means anything with a browser can be used to send SMS texts from one's phone number. If you want to talk directly to their gateway via software, similar to Google voice, one must pay extra.

    ... Skype for Windows 10 PCs.

    It's another reason to avoid Windows 10. I got a Skype account just after Microsoft bought it and like many people, keep the account because so many other people haven't changed to a better service.

  27. In other news... by KC0A · · Score: 1

    Linked-In announced that it is shutting down in 2018.

  28. Meanwhile by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile the rest of us just continue using Viber and get on with our lives.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  29. NEWS FLASH by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    Skype is for kids. And not the smart kids either. The kids that think "Facebook is the internet" and the CD-ROM drive tray is a cupholder.

    1. Re:NEWS FLASH by mridoni · · Score: 1

      and the CD-ROM drive tray is a cupholder.

      What is this "CD-ROM" you're talking about, some new streaming protocol?

    2. Re:NEWS FLASH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then they play with themselves naked and it passes Microsoft spyware servers. Stored.

      Some leaked, some just wait.

  30. Stopped at Microsoft Kills Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and rejoiced

  31. Dear Microsoft, fix embedded Skype! by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    I bought a phone in 2010 specifically to use Skype Mobile. The client stopped working not long after you shrubs got your sticky mitts on it. FIX IT, ASSHOLES!

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  32. Re:There is some high level idiot exec at Microsof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, his name is Satya Nadella. Can we please have Ballmer back?

    Compared to Nadella, Ballmer was a compassionate leader who listened to his customers and made great decisions.

  33. Re:There is some high level idiot exec at Microsof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but the deckchairs are _well_ rearranged. Never has the deck of the Titanic been so tidy!

  34. SKYPE IS FOR KIDS alright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then they play with themselves naked and it passes Microsoft spyware servers. Stored.

    Some leaked, some just wait.

  35. thief by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

    Who is this Microsoft you are talking about?

    Is that the guy who stole money from me the last 4 times I bought a laptop? That guy said he would give me my money back but never did. I even got it in writing, but he said "sue me"... and I couldn't be bothered.

    Yeah... I remember now. I hate that guy. He's very old and tired. Wish he would just die already.