Slashdot Mirror
Frontier Teams With AT&T To Block Google Fiber Access To Utility Poles (arstechnica.com)
An anonymous reader writes from a report via Ars Technica: Frontier submitted a court filing last week supporting ATT's efforts to sue local governments in Louisville and Jefferson County, Kentucky to stop a new ordinance designed to give Google Fiber and similar companies access to utility poles. They're concerned the ordinances will spread to other states. Frontier's filing said, "the issues raised by the case may have important implications for Frontier's business and may impact the development of law in jurisdictions throughout the country where Frontier operates." The ordinance in Louisville lets companies like Google Fiber install wires even if ATT doesn't respond to requests or rejects requests to attach lines. Companies don't have to notify ATT when they want to move ATT's wires to make room for their own wires, assuming the work won't cause customer outages. ATT claims that the ordinance lets competitors "seize ATT's property." Frontier is urging the court to consider the nationwide implications of upholding Louisville's ordinance, saying Louisville's rule "is unprecedented" because "it drastically expands the rights of third parties to use privately owned utility poles, giving non-owners unfettered access to [a] utility's property without the [...] utility in some cases even having knowledge that such third-party intrusion on its facilities is occurring." Frontier said companies should be required to negotiation access with the owners if they didn't pay to install the utility poles. They urged the court to deny Louisville Metro's motion to dismiss ATT's complaint.
We don't want Google fiber competing with us and providing cheap internet that is 50x faster. What, do you expect us to actually invest in upgrading ourselves, and even funnier, lowering our prices?
That sounds like a great model to go to... IF Frontier and AT&T then also have to "negotiate access" with all the property owners of the land their poles are on!
Pick an aphorism: Goose/gander, pot/kettle, glass houses, "be careful what you wish for," and all that...
"[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz
...to move to a public utility model for telecom. Government owns and maintains the right-of-way and the copper/glass. Everybody who wants to gets to buy access to it, be it last mile or peerage
No. Please spare us the tired, "the guvamint will screw it up" argument. It's bullshit. I can show you public utility districts that make their commercial counterparts in the electrical service delivery business look like third-world pretenders. It works as well as it does for one simple reason, the district is beholden to the electorate, not shareholders.
Happened over 10 years ago in Lafayette, LA. But it was a City vs AT&T and Cable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://arstechnica.com/tech-po...
In most districts I've seen the utility companies don't pay any kind of excise tax or ownership tax on "their" poles. Since they're already getting special treatment as these poles are seen as supporting a public utility, they shouldn't be too surprised to see some strings getting attached to this special treatment.
Require the "owning" company to move connections, etc., in a reasonable amount of time after being notified. If the connections aren't moved within the legally mandated time, then "ownership" of the pole is transferred to the requesting company. That would prevent the "we don't have time" or "we're going to ignore you" or the other kinds of slimy activities that the owning company would perform in order to handicap their competitor.
I was forced to use Frontier service for a couple of years. I used their DSL service.
I got 2 or three "cease and desist" letters during this time for exceeding 100GB in a month.
This was in the 2009-2010 range. Even then 100GB was not hard at all to hit.
I also gave up trying to ever get any service from them, their tech support was terrible / non-existent. I was having some trouble getting the router that THEY provided me into a bridging mode so that I could use my own firewall. They kept telling me that it was impossible, that "their side" didn't support it.
After a bit of tinkering on my own, I did get their pos router into a bridging mode.
My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
Imminent means "about to happen." (to make matters worse there's also an "immanent," or "existing or operating within; inherent")
You want Eminent Domain.
Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
The same type of thing is happening in San Jose. Comcast and AT&T are working hard to keep Google Fiber out of the Bay Area in California, by denying access to utility poles. I called the Northern California Joint Pole Association (NCJPA) myself to ask them some questions, and they were somewhat flummoxed on the phone. I guess it never occurred to them that helping monopolists protect their turf might tick off the local population.
Or a more current example
http://www.robertpeterson.org/...
Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
Towns and cities have the absolute right to let "third parties use your poles" because your poles exist in the public right-of-ways like along roads, sidewalks, and the municipalities grant you easements over people's property, because they see poles as a public good.
This business of using the public for your private profit and then whining about it when you have to abide by rules made by the public, is poor judgement at best. It's whining. The briefs themselves are subterfuge because they ignore the right of the public to regulate pole use.
So stop lying, Frontier and AT&T and get with the fucking program and let competition on "your" (ours, really) poles.
Dipshits.
--
BMO
Frontier and AT&T are half right: no one should be allowed to tamper with the existing attachments without notifying the company who owns those wires and giving them reasonable opportunity to act. That way lies chaos and disruption.
They're dead wrong about the "negotiate access" thing though. Those utility poles are in public right of ways. The public has a right to use them under common carriage rules whether their "owners" like it or not. If the utilities don't like it, the localities can and should take them over for public use same as the roads.
Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
If you look in the background, the T in DENTAL is obscured so it looks like DENIAL
That picture is just so /perfect/.
--
BMO
AT&T doesn't own any of the land that the poles are on. These local governments should threaten to use imminent domain to reclaim the poles and then lease them back to AT&T and anyone else who wants to use them. Basically, force AT&T to play nice or make them pay for the privilege of their monopoly.
A similar situation is playing out in the very sparsely populated area where I live: Centurylink has decided that it's not profitable to service my area so, they refuse to do any new DSL installations. Large expensive homes are built only to find that, at best, they are stuck on satellite internet and, at worst, will have no internet connection at all (cell phones don't work here so, that's not an option). Homes that Centurylink has previously serviced are being sold to new owners only to find out that Centurylink won't *re-install* an internet connection for the new owners. Since Centurylink owns all the poles and refuses to service the area anymore, the situation will never improve unless the local government intervenes.
The problem is that the local governments are either clueless or corrupt (frequently both I would imagine). My neighbor is literally the state senator for my area and when I've brought up the issue with him (in person), he considers it to be so low priority that he gives me some meaningless platitude and changes the subject. I don't think he's necessarily in the pocket of Centurylink, I think he just doesn't understand/believe what I'm telling him. He's from the "business can do no wrong" generation so, some nerd half his age must be either over reacting or just plain wrong.
It's amazing to see our infrastructure stagnate and crumble because the previous generation has sold us out to the highest bidder and doesn't see anything wrong with that.
The closest pole to me is on my property, and I'm not even an AT&T customer any more.
In most locations, the right of way to the municipality actually includes a number of feet beyond the edge of the road, and they are the ones that provided the utility with the access. Just because your lawn goes to the curb has never meant you actually had full rights to it.
Funny, I just read Comcast has the opposite complaint. A local power utility was about to rip down Comcast's lines for failing to pay their pole attachment fees, "which would have killed service for about 7,000 Comcast customers."
âoeUnfortunately, the utility has been unwilling to compromise and has billed Comcast for arbitrary pole rates that are nearly three times the national average,â said Horwitz. Comcast claimed [the power company is] using their position as a monopoly to gouge customers with high rates.
If the cognitive dissonance of that last quote doesn't make your head explode, it's a good read:
http://stopthecap.com/2016/06/...
Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
If they claim they own the utility poles, then they might own property taxes to the municipalities. Land owners also might demand rent for all the lines over private property. The city could also charge them rent/fee for using public easements and public rights of way.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact