Slashdot Mirror


HP Rolls Out Device-as-a-Service for PCs, Printers (eweek.com)

HP says it plans to provide companies with personal computers and other devices as part of a service. Corporate customers of HP's new initiative dubbed "device-as-a-service" will be able to pay a fixed monthly fee per employee for devices, eliminating the need to pay the retail cost upfront for hardware. From a report on eWeek:The Palo Alto, Calif.-based company unveiled a DaaS (device-as-a-service) initiative, one that has already been up and running with several of its clients for the last few months. As more and more millennials come into the work force, they expect to see light, fast, small, and up-to-date tools to use, because that's what they're used to, and their tools are like a badge of honor, HPI's Vice-President and General Manager of Support Services Bill Avey said. "Older employees might want bigger screen and keyboards. The point is, work tools need to fit the work force, and as workforces become more diverse, the tools must adjust fit the needs," Avey said. Otherwise, Avey said, employees will find workarounds in so-called shadow IT (using their own laptops, smartphones, tablets and applications) to get the job done -- which is always a nightmare for enterprise security professionals.

75 comments

  1. Um... isn't this just a lease? by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    How is this news? Slashvertisement maybe?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Um... isn't this just a lease? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's news because now is the OEM who leases the equipment directly to the customer without intermediaries ...

    2. Re:Um... isn't this just a lease? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Of course it's not just a lease. It as "-as-a-service" right there in the name! That means it's 10 times more expensive than something that's "just a lease".

    3. Re:Um... isn't this just a lease? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just a different name for the same crap. What's old is new again. The shit bus goes around and around. This is why corps shouldn't be so afraid of having "old people" around in the company. We've seen this same crap years ago.

      Cloud = mainframe time share
      Device as a Service = Hardware leasing/professional services.

      Maybe listen to the "old people" once in a while kiddos, we've seen this shit before. Before long people will realize that outsourcing stuff like this costs more than having it in house...and the shit bus comes back around.

      Sigh. Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it.

  2. This sounds familiar... by KingDaveRa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Once upon a time, we called this 'leasing'. But, whatever, call it something new and pretend it's a fantastic new thing.

    1. Re:This sounds familiar... by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing.

      Perhaps the differentiator is that they set up and manage the devices too?

      That sounds like a whole different nightmare though.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:This sounds familiar... by haruchai · · Score: 1

      I worked for years for a healthcare company that used Compaq / HP as their managed services provider right down to desktops & laptops (network hardware was mostly Cisco with some 3Com and Foundry ). I would rather have you all killed than suffer such a fate.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    3. Re:This sounds familiar... by ewhenn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Personally I' surprised they didn't use buzz words like "disruptive" and "paradigm".

    4. Re:This sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once upon a time, we called this 'leasing'. But, whatever, call it something new and pretend it's a fantastic new thing.

      This is actually a good thing for lots of businesses. Capital expenditures (and most computer/hardware devices are still considered capital expenditures for tax/accounting purposes) cannot be deducted entirely in the first year. You have to depreciate them on a schedule and then when you get rid of them, you have to account for their residual value (depending on the age of the equipment). It is a pain in the butt for something that doesn't cost a whole lot of money. If I spend $50,000 on a high precision lathe, I'd be willing to go through the accounting hoops for it. But for a $1000 business PC? Not so much. I'd rather lease it, take the deduction up front for the cost of the lease (leasing is not a capital expenditure) and be done with it. Even if it costs me more in the long run, the money I will have saved in terms of time and hassle will be well worth it. Where this makes less sense is for large businesses. They already have full time finance/accounting staff that can handle this. But for a small business this is practically a no-brainer.

    5. Re:This sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once upon a time, we called this 'leasing'. But, whatever, call it something new and pretend it's a fantastic new thing.

      You're confusing HP with Elon Musk. If He did it, then it would be considered something new and innovative.

      Actually, I'm trying to get a hold of him so that he can look at my plan for a human powered two wheeled transportation (HP2WT) I devised that will revolutionize personal transportation. I also have an app that will allow someone to get a ride on the back of one of these human powered two-wheeled transportation systems (HP2WT).

      I'm looking for funding too. I think $10million isn't enough to ask for 10% of the company. But things are going well and I expect it to be worth $200million by the Monday. I should be a billionaire by the end of Summer.

    6. Re:This sounds familiar... by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing.

      Ditto. Now get off our lawn with your new-fangled as a service nonsense.

    7. Re:This sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I' surprised they didn't use buzz words like "disruptive" and "paradigm".

      The way this program works is far too turnkey to be considered disruptive.

    8. Re:This sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to think that businesses order thousands of completely different machines. This is far from the case. The truth is that most of them are the same models, from the same manufacturer and they are bought/replaced at the same time and carry the same value and depreciation schedule.

      It is a once and done kind of thing accounting wise about every 3 years. Not exactly challenging to track.

      Leasing also has consequences to the balance sheet and operating leverage. Bigger companies should be carrying the assets and smaller companies should consider leasing.

      Source: was a financial analyst for a decade and now works in IT.

  3. Hell yea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's make them as dumb as they can be, just pay a company if it doesn't work and wait for that company to fail rather than internal failures.

    It's all just shifting of work, it makes sense if they (HP) can build good systems but there is an issue in that what they are doing is so simple that it's hard to justify paying hundreds per month for it.

    I'd rather just see something like the opposite of CUPS. The reality is that cunts are taking over the Internet for the sake of rich people.

  4. Shaking the hornets nest now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shifting capital costs to an operational cost? That interferes with our enterprise's whole tax strategy! Someone ought to make this kind of thievery illegal!

  5. How low can HP go? by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nothing like going from basically founding Silicon Valley to competing with the likes of Aaron's and Rent-A-Center!

    Just shut down, HP, you're embarrassing yourself.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  6. Hardware isn't expensive by DogDude · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hardware isn't expensive at all. PC's can be had for next to nothing. It's the software that costs the real $$! And considering computer hardware generally doesn't wear out, it's a no-brainer for us to buy cheap hardware, and save our IT money for good software.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Hardware isn't expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And considering computer hardware generally doesn't wear out

      Where do I buy this magical hardware that doesn't wear out, exactly?

    2. Re:Hardware isn't expensive by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Any computer without moving parts shouldn't wear out. Hell, most PC's with some moving parts don't fail for the first 20 years or so.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:Hardware isn't expensive by adolf · · Score: 2

      And yet, solid-state electronics with no moving part fail fairly regularly.

      You act as if you've never actually had your hands on any 20-year-old hardware: 20 years ago, computer stuff regularly broke within a couple of years: I know this because I was fixing them 20 years ago. That which is still left is simply at the other end of the MTBF scale.

    4. Re:Hardware isn't expensive by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > Where do I buy this magical hardware that doesn't wear out, exactly?

      Amazon, Dell, Newegg, HP

      Most hardware these days lasts long enough to become obsolete.

      There's always been a huge resale market in old office machines that are still perfectly functional. These machines haven't worn out. They're just a little behind the curve or have been fully depreciated by the accountants.

      I myself have contributed to the sales decline of PCs by upgrading old office machines.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:Hardware isn't expensive by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that *might* be plausible - if you never change operating systems.
      So 20 yrs, hmmm, you're still on Windows 95?? How's that working out for you?

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    6. Re:Hardware isn't expensive by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      And yet, solid-state electronics with no moving part fail fairly regularly.

      Only if by "fairly regularly" you mean "almost never". ICs may become obsolete, but they don't "wear out". Even solder cracks or whiskers are very rare on modern SMT boards. Computers fail when the HDD bearings wear out, or when you drop it and crack the display, not because of the electronics. Most replaced computers are still functional, they are just no longer cost effective in terms of productivity and power consumption.

    7. Re:Hardware isn't expensive by adolf · · Score: 1

      Except for the RRoD, YLoD, over a decade of unscrupulous bad/underspecified capacitor guffaws, the continuing lead-free solder fallout from RoHS, and electron migration slowly killing things like IC radio transceivers, I guess you're right!

      This stuff will last FOREVER!

    8. Re: Hardware isn't expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Windows10 is the last windows EVAR! /s

    9. Re:Hardware isn't expensive by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Electrolytic capacitors have a limited life span and will eventually, inevitably fail whether they're used or not.

    10. Re:Hardware isn't expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends. At work the only paid software I'm using is Sublime Text and that's only because it's personal license. And maybe OS X if it can be counted as paid software, though I should just take the hit for a day and switch to Linux. Tiling window managers are a lot better on bigger screens than whatever is the OS X's window manager & I dislike those cmd shortcuts.

    11. Re:Hardware isn't expensive by Nethead · · Score: 1

      We had a full HP shop using the enterprise gear. Great stuff, easy to work on and the only desktop that broke got tossed out of a second story window, so that was an HR issue.

      The HP enterprise laptops held up well for the hell some of our engineers gave them as they hopped the globe.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    12. Re:Hardware isn't expensive by Nethead · · Score: 1

      After $dayjob got bought by a multinational we did a "refresh" of our fully HP shop (aerospace) to Dell. CFO let us give away the "old" HP desktops and laptops to employees. Many happy campers with i5/16GB/480GB SSD machines now that will last them, and be very usable, for many years. Of course IT kept the i7 and Xeon boxes.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    13. Re:Hardware isn't expensive by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      the continuing lead-free solder fallout from RoHS

      False, there is no continuing lead free solder fallout.

      Tin's habit of whiskering is well understood and has been for decades. Probably half a century by now. In fact, it's exactly WHY we initially used an alloy of tin and lead - lead seems to control, but not prevent, whiskering to an extent. Plus, being cheap, well, we stopped looking after that. But even leaded solder whiskers. It's something we've known about and control for.

      The only thing RoHS did was re-start the search for another element that can control tin's whiskering habit. We don't know WHY tin does it, nor where the atoms com from (it doesn't come from the immediate area - you don't see depressions of tin around whiskers).

      In fact, we know "bright tin" has a nasty habit of whiskering really badly - you normally find this on mounting hardware (screws, spacers, mounts, etc)

      Tin whiskers. There are many things we do to control it, but that's it. It whiskers. All you can do is control it.

  7. The copier scam cometh again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this is how the copier industry used to operate. It went under for a reason.

    Silliness...

    1. Re: The copier scam cometh again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Copier business still going strong using the same model (at least in my offices). Not sure what the profit is but it can't be much.

    2. Re: The copier scam cometh again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Copier business still going strong using the same model (at least in my offices). Not sure what the profit is but it can't be much.

      You'd be surprised.

      Source: work for a copier company

  8. About time... by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

    In all of the organizations I worked in over my 15 year I.T. career, we were never able to defend from all of those "shadow IT" computers employees would bring from home. I mean, despite corporate policy specifying against doing that, there's just no possible way to prevent rogue Mac, Linux and Commodore 64 computers from joining secure domains and having complete access to the network.

    Thank you, HP, for saving us all!
    (insert eye roll here)

    1. Re:About time... by addikt10 · · Score: 1

      Thought you were serious at first with just the one line summary displaying.
      Clicked reply just to say "802.1x".... but instead I'll only chuckle.

    2. Re:About time... by friedmud · · Score: 1

      While I got a chuckle out of your comment I'll just mention that you don't need to be able to get on the network in order to get sensitive corporate information on employee's devices.

      People will forward emails to their personal account or upload something to dropbox or just start work correspondence with their personal email. Happens all the time.

      The best way to fight against this is to make work machines as useable and user-friendly as possible... so there is less incentive to try to move work onto a personal device. That seems to be the goal here... even if this sounds fairly dubious.

    3. Re:About time... by The-Ixian · · Score: 3, Informative

      there's just no possible way to prevent rogue Mac, Linux and Commodore 64 computers from joining secure domains and having complete access to the network

      Well, yes, actually, their is. It's called 802.1x and can provide authentication for all capable devices on the network.

      In addition, you can also use NAP to limit who can get a DHCP address.

      Or there are port level MAC filters on the switches.

      You could also firewall your servers from the LAN and use ACLs based on MAC addresses, IPs or L7 rules.

      I am sure there are more methods you could choose from, but those are the few I could thing of off the cuff.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    4. Re:About time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least some of those can be gotten around by using a cheap DSL-Router where the WAN-Port is set to use DHCP and the MAC-Adress of the computer it's impersonating. On its LAN side it will happily supply DHCP-Addresses to everyone who asks, including the original computer which is set as the DMZ host so that all connection attempts are routed through to it. The other switch ports can then be used by whatever systems you'd like to connect to the network.

  9. My rule of bum^H thumb by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you see "X as a service", especially in an advert, replace X with "sodomy".

    Because you are so totally going to get fucked up the arse. And charged for it.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  10. Wow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watching HP today is akin to watching an A-list actress go from staring in blockbuster movies to walking the streets as a $5 crack whore.

  11. The World Of The Future: You Own NOTHING by kheldan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everything you have is 'rented' or 'leased', save consumables. Your house, your car, your phone, your computer, your furniture, even the clothes on your back are 'rented' or 'leased' to you for a monthly fee. I'm sure there are plenty of corporations out there that would love that world, where they have a guaranteed monthly income that is not dependent on sales, just lock everyone into lease contracts for everything they own. And, naturally, since you don't own any of it, you have zero rights to do what you want with it, and the 'owner' has 100% rights, so you have to put up with whatever their decisions are. Ads in your face 24/7/365? Keystroke logging? Tracking of viewing habits? Tracking of your location and activities? It's all in the lease agreement you had to sign in order to have even a place to live.

    Talk about your dystopian futures! All the above of course is mere fiction. It's more like something I'd expect from the world of Neal Stephenson's Snow Crash than anything in the real world. But it doesn't mean that some corporate types don't have these thoughts, either..

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:The World Of The Future: You Own NOTHING by retroworks · · Score: 1

      Karl Marx thought of it first.

      --
      Gently reply
    2. Re:The World Of The Future: You Own NOTHING by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Everything you have is 'rented' or 'leased', save consumables. Your house, your car, your phone, your computer, your furniture, even the clothes on your back are 'rented' or 'leased' to you for a monthly fee.

      You can thank millennials for that.

      Ask them - they LIKE not owning stuff. Why own a movie you'll only see once? Just pay the rental and be done with it. Ditto music - why buy music - just rent it - far better to have more songs to listen to than a few songs you really like.

      Ditto phones - why buy a phone and toss it in two years - just rent it and get a new one the next year (and not worry about selling/etc the old phone).

      Repeat ad naseum - owning sucks because you have to deal with it when you don't want it anymore, renting is best because in a year's time, who knows? You probably want the newer thing so return the old and get the new - don't let the old rot in a dusty closet.

      Truth be told, they are somewhat right - in an age where you might be changing jobs every 2 years and moving in the same, "owning" is hard. Why buy real paper books that you have to move every couple of years? Rent/lease e-books and you move light electrons over heavy atoms. Also, with high housing prices, affordable units are tiny.

      And I admit, I know a Gen Xer with the same attitude - he prefers digital over physical all the way because the digital only clogs small hard drives, while the physical creates clutter in the house.

    3. Re:The World Of The Future: You Own NOTHING by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      And I admit, I know a Gen Xer with the same attitude - he prefers digital over physical all the way because the digital only clogs small hard drives, while the physical creates clutter in the house.

      I might be in the same boat. I'd rather have my music/movies/TV shows on a relatively small server (and backed up to a couple of binders full of BD-Rs in my office desk) than sprawled across lots of shelves.

      At some point, I'd also like to digitize the books I have and thin out that collection considerably...probably only keep those which are autographed, or which have some other sort of special connection. I picked up a book scanner a while ago, but the initial firmware release definitely has issues that need to be resolved.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  12. If you count ink, this is not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Previously, you'd buy an HP inkjet and you'd really just paid an entry fee to be able to buy ink from them on a regular basis.

    Presumably this deal extends beyond inkjet printers, and the payments are more-regularly-scheduled than average.

  13. Stereotype people much Bill? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    "As more and more millennials come into the work force, they expect to see light, fast, small, and up-to-date tools to use, because that's what they're used to, and their tools are like a badge of honor," HPI's Vice-President and General Manager of Support Services Bill Avey said. "Older employees might want bigger screen and keyboards."

    I want a pony -- a small one that gets bigger as I get older.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Stereotype people much Bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever I share my screen with someone over the age of 50, their first comment? Can you make that bigger, please? Usually have to crank it to 200% before they're content with being able to see it.

  14. More like Apps as an App! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP is simply letting app appers app apps while apping other apps, which is perfectly appy! Only LUDDITES want to own their actual LUDDITE computer.

    Apps!

  15. As more and more millennials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...come into the work force, they expect TROPHYS!!!! TROPHYS!!!
    Please be sensitive and caring or they will cry.

  16. Just wait for the rent a car ding and dent bs to c by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Just wait for the rent a car ding and dent bs to come. Just hope they don't give a system with an 5-6 year old HDD that wears out and then you need pay the full price of a new disk + an lost of use fee.

  17. Mod parent up, please. by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

    It's already happening with software and electronics; it's already happening with cars (especially Teslas); it's starting to happen with everything else (i.e., everything infected with "IoT" bullshit). The DMCA and other parts of copyright law are being used as a lever to usurp actual property rights, the Uniform Commercial Code and the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Where does it end?

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:Mod parent up, please. by kheldan · · Score: 1

      See, I actually do know and understand everything you're saying; I just wanted someone else to say it. ;-) We have to be careful or the dystopian future I speak of will happen.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  18. fans getting clogged up / failing as well. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Fans getting clogged up / failing as well.

    PSUs going bad.

  19. Isnt this called a lease? by skyeagle53 · · Score: 1

    Nothing new just rebranded

  20. yep, just a lease by swschrad · · Score: 1

    and the lease fee ensures a higher level of profit, as HP becomes a finance company as well as equipment supplier. I'd avoid it like WinX

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:yep, just a lease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      leases are generally much more rigid with term lengths, costs and quantity.

      "as a service" i expect the flexibility to be able to order three new systems for new employees one month, order a larger screen the next for someone else, and have them pick up one other system two months later that are no longer needed... and pay only for the equipment in use and on site each month... and have anything that breaks, fixed or replaced within a business day, perhaps even with a standby (unpaid for until put in service) unit that is already on site.

    2. Re:yep, just a lease by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      It may be flexible, but it's still just a lease.

  21. and this is different from mainframers, how? by swschrad · · Score: 1

    IBM, HP, DEC, etc all did that on "too big to carry" equipment.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  22. Hmmm by fubarrr · · Score: 0

    An especially fucktardic business model: product-as-a-service. You give money for a device, but essentially don't own it withou brand's blessing

  23. Just a lease by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the differentiator is that they set up and manage the devices too?

    Still a lease. Might have a service contract attached to the lease but if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...

    1. Re:Just a lease by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      A leased rose by any other name is still a leased rose.

    2. Re: Just a lease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also known as a non-genuine HP part detected. Shutting down...

  24. All computers can fail by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Any computer without moving parts shouldn't wear out.

    The might not "wear" out but they do fail. Moving parts are just one failure mode among many.

    Hell, most PC's with some moving parts don't fail for the first 20 years or so.

    Since very few PCs remain in service for 20 years I'm not really sure where you are getting this data. Yes there are some out there but the average age of a PC is supposedly around 5 years. Laptops tend to wear out sooner than desktops. Even if the machine could remain alive for 20 years the software in most cases would be obsolete and unsupported long before you reached 20 years of service. A Windows PC from 20 years ago would have been running Windows 95 or NT. Tell me how many of those you've run into in the last 5 years.

    1. Re:All computers can fail by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I see 10-20 year old computers in use all the time. "Obsolete" equipment doesn't evaporate, it gets refurbished and resold to people who can't or don't want to afford the latest and greatest.

      Most of those computers run Win 7, but a substantial number run Linux.

    2. Re:All computers can fail by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Everything fails, but most solid state parts have a MTBF of 100+ years. The compound and your anecdotal failure rate may be slightly higher, but given the staggering number of computing devices being sold every year and the fact that repair shops are almost non-existent and never were that good of a business model (I've worked for quite a bit of them), I would say that the majority of computing devices never failed.

      Even spinning hard drives only have a 1% failure rate over their life spans. Most of the electronics purchased never fail, I still got working 10Mbps routers and even a Sun UltraSPARC II (circa 1999) for production use with working 30GB SCSI disks.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:All computers can fail by adolf · · Score: 1

      Repairing computers stopped being economical when the cost to repair, including labor, came close to or exceeded the price of a new box from Wal-Mart. Simple fucking economics.

      I do admire your ability to present nonsense as fact, though: "Even spinning hard drives only have a 1% failure rate over their life spans" carries about as much truthiness as "HOLDS UP TO 50 POUNDS, OR MORE! "

  25. Just the ongoing reversal of the "PC Revolution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM, DEC, HP, etc became wealthy on the model of owning the hardware and software and leasing it along with service agreements to businesses. This worked very well FOR THEM, but for most businesses and individuals this was a nasty abusive thing.

    Apple and Microsoft, etc became the new super-rich companies by upending that model. They SOLD a customer hardware and/or software which the user then owned and could use in perpetuity without paying anything more. People and businesses could administer, maintain, and replace stuff at will and on their own schedules instead of on somebody else's schedule. The era of the service guy showing up on HIS schedule and following a marketing-based behavioral script to bamboozle the customers into buying more, in place of an actual expert doing real and necessary maintenance/service ended. This ignited the PC Revolution which eventually forced all the big old vendors to either adopt the model of more user freedom and control, or die as an obsolete dinosaur.

    As companies like Apple and Microsoft and Adobe, etc hit the market saturation point, they started to see the value of the old model as a way to show ever-growing revenue without an ever-growing market and they started re-branding it with new names like "the cloud".

    Younger users,gullible and ignorant of the past, do not seem to realize the ride they are being taken on and just how hard it was to escape that old foul business model. If you do not own the hardware and the software then you do not own the data either; you are at the mercy of somebody else for security, maintenance, service, etc.

  26. What in the actual fuck? by clonehappy · · Score: 2

    As more and more millennials come into the work force, they expect to see light, fast, small, and up-to-date tools to use, because that's what they're used to, and their tools are like a badge of honor

    Or how about they use the right tool for job, as determined by people who have actually been doing the fucking job? And how is a tool, be it a computer or airhammer or ratchet or saw a "badge of honor"? What the hell is this stuffed suit babbling about?

    Older employees might want bigger screen and keyboards

    Unless the "job" is posting on social media all day, watching cat videos, or sending pictures of your junk to strangers you meet on apps, what real work can anyone of any age or demographic actually get done on a mobile device? If your job involves creating content, code, spreadsheets, documents, really anything at all, how can you do it efficiently without a real screen and keyboard? I really doubt "millennials" or anyone else are so special that they can be productive pounding on a sheet of glass like a monkey.

  27. Disaster-as-a-service by Enter+the+Shoggoth · · Score: 1

    When I read the headline I thought it said "Disaster-as-a-service".
    Even though it's been 3 years since I worked for them I think the 13 years that I did spend there could be best summed up by that phrase.

    --
    Andy Warhol got it right / Everybody gets the limelight
    Andy Warhol got it wrong / Fifteen minutes is too long.
  28. NSA will be pleased by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    That will lower the cost of infecting enterprise PC for NSA: no need to craft an exploit like Stuxnet, just infect the hardware that gets shipped.

  29. Ancient idea made to look new by Contract+Gypsy · · Score: 0

    Shit, Dell was doing this deal with GE 8 or so years ago. This is just another HP hype, but their stock is still hopeless.

    --
    Life is in a state of dynamic equilibrium, it both blows and sucks
  30. "... as a service." by nuckfuts · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The new word for "rental".

  31. nike air max pas cher France by zhenjunya · · Score: 0

    air max 90 area to glimpse for these great and cost-effective shoes is world wide web, there are many websites on the web which offer and industry these affordable footwear.In point, most of the businesses that sell these awesome footwear will generally have web site internet sites and on the internet portals as a result of which potential consumers can overview the obtainable merchandise and make their orders.The implication being built here is that when you shop for this sort of shoes by way of the world wide web, you will be uncovered to a selection of positive aspects. For starters, you will get to glimpse at the a variety of makes of these irresistible sneakers. This way, you will get an over-all concept of which sneakers you want.This means that previous to you make the order, you will have seen several pairs of sneakers.

  32. Who cares what employees want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's what makes that productive that matters. They will often want things that have little to no production value and they may ask very loudly for these things.

    That's not reason to give them to them anymore than it's a reason to give a child candy merely because they are persistently asking. The fact of the matter is small gadget have proven to have little production value. Even smartphones don't live up to but a tiny fraction of what you'd think they could/would do and do so rapidly.

    Gadges willt sell, but like smartphones it's a downward spiral in profits as people realize the limits of what they can do and thus the value in them. Tablets and smartphones have a long long way to go to live up to what they should be able to do and honestly what they should have been able to do years ago. I'm not impressed by any of the mobile technology one bit and I don't believe most people are. The mobile market if deflating overall as people realize there is no need to pay 500+ dollars for a tiny computer that has limited roles and doesn't even deliver well at those. This applies to all the mobile OSs. If anything Windows 10 Mobile is the easiest to use, but lacks apps and general support from the market. Android is confusing splintered crap and perhaps the most insecure mass installed OS in the world.