Slashdot Mirror


Top Gear Host Chris Evans Steps Down After Poor Ratings (theverge.com)

A number of readers have submitted news coming out of popular show Top Gear. Chris Evans has announced he is leaving his role as a presenter on BBC Two's Top Gear after one series. His resignation comes amid falling ratings for the show -- which hit a series low on Sunday night, with an average of 1.9 million viewers. The Verge reports:Evans was brought in alongside Matt LeBlanc and host of other new faces to fill the positions left by Clarkson, James May, and Richard Hammond. The first series of the show had poor ratings, with fewer than 2 million viewers tuning into its series finale this weekend -- lower than any episode helmed by Clarkson.

44 of 251 comments (clear)

  1. of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Back when the Top Gear 2002 was (re)booted, I wouldn't have said it but after 20-something seasons - there's no team that can replace Clarkson, Hammond and May. Their charisma together was quite unique and I loved the show, for all of its faults.

    1. Re:of course by monkeyxpress · · Score: 2, Informative

      The other problem they have is that the old show hasn't stopped. It has simply moved to a new channel where it will get an even bigger budget.

      Unless Clarkson and co really stuff up, it is hard to see how their *new* show won't be at least as popular as their old gig. With Amazon's budget, a break, a license to try some fresh stuff, and in some ways even, a 'don't care, nothing to prove' attitude, they will probably be pretty successful at keeping the franchise alive with its previous viewers. Whether they can broaden that base to the US market is another question, and probably the bigger challenge.

      Personally I'm happy Evans has gone. I hadn't heard of him before the show was announced, but he just came across as a wannabee Clarkson with an extremely irritating voice (seriously, I would never have believed his job was in radio if I hadn't read it myself). Perhaps he does have an interesting personality, but I didn't see it on the show. Matt Leblanc seems to have been an inspired choice though. It will be interesting to see whether he gets the show traction in the US.

    2. Re:of course by somenickname · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly this. It was a silly show but, you couldn't help but watch it even if your didn't give a shit about cars. It was *fun*. And had the added benefit of seeing insanely expensive cars that you'll never drive. Being driven by a mute gimp in a helmet. Brilliant.

    3. Re:of course by umafuckit · · Score: 2

      Personally I'm happy Evans has gone. I hadn't heard of him before the show was announced,

      Yes, he's been broadcasting for years and years and he's always been annoying. He's had several talk shows on TV in addition to the radio work. For some reason a lot of people seem to like listening to him rabbit on about nothing in particular. I can't see the attraction myself.

    4. Re:of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Clarkson,Wilson and Needell. But that was when it was about cars.

      And there is a reason why pretty much nobody remembers the last two.

    5. Re: of course by bestweasel · · Score: 5, Funny

      He hosts a breakfast radio show, I think because it helps to hurry people out of their homes in the morning.

    6. Re:of course by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Clarkson,Wilson and Needell. But that was when it was about cars.

      Yep.

      It's easy to forget now, but the "old" Top Gear was itself pretty successful in its 90s heyday. Not to the extent that people banged on and on and on and on about it to the tedious extent they do with the post-2003 version. But still a well-known touchstone of 1990s television that was responsible for making Clarkson popular in the first place and strongly associated with him.

      It feels strange to say in hindsight (given that nowadays it's clear that Clarkson is the epitome of the boorish, tedious, right-wing, middle-aged, Middle English tosser), but I actually enjoyed him during his time on the original show, possibly because he was actually doing his ******* job of reviewing cars in an entertaining manner. In fact, he was a good presenter on the other stuff I saw him in (admittedly car-related shows he'd obviously got because of his Top Gear fame). I'd even say Top Gear lost something when he left. (Along with some other changes, I clearly remember enjoying it less in the year or two running up to its cancellation).

      Problem was that by the time he'd come back for the 2003 relaunch, he'd gone from being a presenter who said non-PC things that were often pretty amusing- such as the infamous "good enough to snap knicker elastic at 50 paces" description of one car- to someone whose defining characteristic was Professional Non-PC Merchant. Not in the service of being amusing, but for its own sake. And Clarkson was famous enough by this point that it was now about him; you can't watch him as a presenter any more because he isn't.

      This brings me to the most fundamental difference in the relaunched show (even more so than the format change). Old Top Gear was a factual magazine show about cars that was presented in an entertaining manner. (#) The new Top Gear was- and is- an entertainment show that happens to revolve around cars, quite happy to sideline or twist any secondary factual aspects if it gets in the way of some stuffed shirt getting vicarious thrills or amusement through The Clarkson and His Two Mates in Car Porn Hijinks Show before he returns to work in his Vauxhall Astra the following day.

      A lot of people obviously enjoy this- good for them. I don't have any time for it personally.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:of course by Dogtanian · · Score: 2

      You got old. You lost your sense of humour. I remember when you used to be cool.

      Damn, even *I* knew I was never cool!

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  2. Re:To be fair... by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Informative

    Matt Le Blanc isn't a bad host but they really need someone dry and British. Eventually they're going to run out of jokes about him being American.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  3. Viewers hate political correctness by jonnyj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I never watch Top Gear. It's not my kind of thing. But I always had a sneaking admiration for the ability of Jeremy Clarkson, the wildly popular former host, to retain his job whilst thumbing his nose at everything the politically correct thought-police hold dear. When they finally find an excuse to sack Clarkson, the cheering and whooping from Broadcasting House could be heard all over the British Isles.

    I always imagined that a politically correct replacement show would tank badly with its core demographic of non-metropolitan blokes. Viewers hate being told what to think, and I'm delighted to see they've rebelled in huge numbers.

    1. Re:Viewers hate political correctness by ArchieBunker · · Score: 4, Informative

      Firing him wasn't an excuse, he punched a co-worker. They had to fire him at that point. That said, I am a fan of him but had no idea he would get physical with anyone.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    2. Re:Viewers hate political correctness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Now, a reasonable staff member would punch back, and the issue wouldn't exist in the first place.

    3. Re:Viewers hate political correctness by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

      There's actually no rule or law which says an employer has to sack someone for a physical assault - they could have reprimanded him, fined him, put him on unpaid leave etc etc and left criminal or civil proceedings to the police and courts.

      But its well known that Clarkson was disliked by the current BBC management.

    4. Re:Viewers hate political correctness by hyades1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      And yet, Jimmy Savile spent half a century raping his way through nearly 600 children while the Beeb's management feigned ignorance of his depredations.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    5. Re:Viewers hate political correctness by JustNiz · · Score: 2

      I'd just punch him back and get on with my day. Seriously kids of today are such whiny little bitches that can't take care of anything for themselves and run and hide behind the system. This apparently includes not having the balls to post their own opinions as themselves, rather than AC.

    6. Re:Viewers hate political correctness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      LOL you'd be the first person filing a lawsuit if someone assaulted you at Burger King.

    7. Re: Viewers hate political correctness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      ^^^^ that's what we did in my time. You fist fight and live to fight another day. After it was over, you shook hands. We had a mutual respect after that.

      Now a days you can't do that. My son got into a fight at school. We had to go to court. Yes real court. For a simple shoving match.

      The world is fucked.

    8. Re:Viewers hate political correctness by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes he was bloodied and dizzy and had to go to hospital. And no they didn't have a drink afterwards. There's no workplace where it's acceptable to punch a colleague other than the boxing ring.

    9. Re:Viewers hate political correctness by rikkards · · Score: 2

      So? Just because they made a mistake before means they have to continue?
      I would say they learned and obviously learned well.
      Clarkson got what was coming. I liked him on the show (and absolutely hate Evans) and am looking forward to their new show and I assume he has learned his lesson.

    10. Re: Viewers hate political correctness by ihtoit · · Score: 2

      There is another word for it, but it isn't "progress". It does start with a P though.

      Pussywhipped.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  4. Re:To be fair... by jonnyj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...charmless, loud-mouthed ginger twat...

    Try replacing the word 'ginger' with a pejorative term for any ethnic group other than the indigenous population of North West Europe and see how intelligent you sound.

  5. It is not like it was not expected... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I mean the moment they announced the guy, almost everybody said he was a really bad choice. It is not only that he doesn't really know about cars, most important is the fact that nobody outside Britain finds him funny (we are talking about a show that is sold to many countries), and even the British are rather divided on this. Hiring Matt LeBlanc was a last-ditch effort, but I guess it was too little too late. Perhaps Rowan Atkinson might be persuaded to give it a go next year?

    1. Re:It is not like it was not expected... by hyades1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If I had mod points, I'd give you one. I suspect not many people here know that Rowan Atkinson is a hard-core car fanatic who knows his subject.

      If they managed to sign him up, I'd certainly start watching again.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  6. Re:To be fair... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    ... because 'ginger' was the problem with the rest of that line, and he was actually going for a sugar coated complement.

  7. Replacing Clarkson, May, and Hammond is like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Replacing the entire cast of Monty Python, and expecting the audience to like the shit that was just shoved down their throat. The only way Top gear is going to succeed is to get Clarkson, May, and Hammond back and fire the dumbass producer that Clarkson backhanded. The US version is crap too and was just cancelled.

  8. Clarkson et al... by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    might have been boors, but were never bores.

  9. Good. by mustermark · · Score: 2

    As a fellow unfiltered mouther, I'm glad that Clarkson's boot has had repercussions. The show was about cars, not politics and diplomacy.

  10. PC BS by megalomaniacs4u · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What the BBC forgot - Clarkson/May/Hammond Top Gear was basically Last of the Summer Wine with Cars & decent locations & slick production.

    The got the cars/locations/production about right but got the chemistry wrong & went with Chris Evans purile humour. Matt LeBlanc seemed to get it, but was badly let down.

  11. It's Not His Fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not his fault, alone. The show sucks. Matt Leblanc sucks.

    BBC failed to realize that the popularity of the show was due to Clarkson, Hammond, and May combined. Watch an episode where it is only any two of them and it sucks. Those specific three COMBINED are just the right chemistry for hilarity. Watch the American TopGear, it sucks. Australian TopGear, it sucks.

    The whole of TopGear UK was greater than the sum of its parts. Here's hoping that Amazon's The Grand Tour, with the real TopGear crew, won't let us down.

  12. Re:FACT by alex67500 · · Score: 2

    There are also reports that he's being questioned by the police regarding sexual assault claims made against him.

  13. Do the smart thing BBC by ttyX · · Score: 2

    End the show for good, it was never going to top the original everybody knew it and it has happened. Waiting for the grand tour now.

  14. Re:To be fair... by RDW · · Score: 5, Funny

    He's a loud mouth idiot who was screaming right up until last week

    If they want to stick with the formula, I believe Nigel Farage is now available.

  15. Well of course! What did they expect! by PRMan · · Score: 2

    You can't put Captain AMERICA on a British show... (Yes, I know. It's a joke, guys...)

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  16. Re:To be fair... by justthinkit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    they really need someone dry and British.

    Jimmy Carr it is then.

    --
    I come here for the love
  17. Here's an idea by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe they should bring Jennifer Aniston, David Schwimmer, Lisa Kudrow, Matthew Perry, and Courtney Cox on board to co-host the show. During the season, they could all share a London flat - maybe have some special episodes hosted from the flat.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  18. Re:To be fair... by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Insightful

    they really need someone dry and British.

    Jimmy Carr it is then.

    I was actually quite surprised they didn't recruit him for it. He's been on both the top and bottom of the leaderboard for star in a reasonably priced car. He has the humor that would keep the show going even in the post-Clarkson era. To a global audience he's as British as the queen. And of course, his name is Carr.

    I don't know what he's doing for work right now, but it certainly doesn't get as much TV time on this side of the pond as Top Gear.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  19. Re:WHY IS THIS HERE?! by TigerPlish · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Because it's news for nerds. Oh, there are more nerds than you think they are. I think your definition of nerd is extremely narrow.

    There are car nerds, computer nerds, aviation nerds, boat/ship nerds, literature nerds, and more.

    So yes, an article about a controversial (and beloved) TV show that was about cars, politics and humor appeals to a broad spectrum of nerds and merits discussion on a board about news for nerds.

    I rarely reply to ACs but this whole "DOES THIS BELONG HERE" faction is even screechier and irritating than SJWs.

    GO away. If you don't like Slashdot, GTFO. Do I need to spell it out for you? OUT!

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  20. Wrong approach ... by garry_g · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The BBC, the new Top Gear production team, or Evans (or combination of those) made one major mistake - they attempted to copy the original Top Gear team ...
    When TG US started, they also tried to set up the format identical to the UK original - and more or less failed. Until they found their own way and just stuck to the format of doing their show ...
    And unless TG UK tries to actually do their own thing (albeit that might take another season or two of learning), they will fail again ...

    1. Re:Wrong approach ... by umafuckit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree, the lack of any real change was a big problem for them. Without a format shift it was Top Gear without Clarkson and Co and that just didn't work. Top Gear worked because of the chemistry the three presenters had; they obviously got on and were having fun, which drew you in as a viewer. There was no chemistry between Evans and LeBlanc so everything felt contrived. I think if the BBC want it to survive they should keep LeBlanc and just let him pick two other people who he really wants to work and go with that. If they fail a second time around the series is dead on the BBC.

  21. Re:Yeah, didn't see that coming! by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I totally agree. I never did get what anyone ever saw in Evans.Have no idea why the BBC ever hired him for anything,
    GT (the old TG team) will be hitting Amazon Prime in supposedly 8 weeks or so with a budget per episode that makes what the BBC gave them look like pocket change. Just what the doctor ordered to get rid of the awful aftertaste of the first season of the new Top Gear.

  22. Three men and some cars by jrq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The formula for Top Gear, after Clarkson completely revamped it from a very pedestrian ordinary car review show, was lifted, almost directly from Jerome K Jerome's Three Men in a Boat. A quintessential English novel that captured the relationship, in-fighting, sulking, and entertaining dynamic of three men on a boat trip. This theatre was played out week after week on Top Gear, when they went on their contrived, ridiculous, and entertaining adventures. By missing this enormous formula, the producers of the show delivered a turkey. Two hosts, do not give you the opportunity to pit two against one, with the teams always changing.

    The signature segment, "star in a reasonably priced car" worked because the guests were driving cars that average people owned. The replacement with a super-charged mini on a part rally course misses this point completely. Top Gear was always silly, slightly annoying, superbly shot and soundtracked.

    Chris Evans, who seems to only have one set of clothes in his wardrobe, was shouty, predictable, and seemingly incapable of interviewing anyone. Matt Le Blanc was surprisingly good.

    --
    My UID is prime!
  23. Re:Medical issue? by vux984 · · Score: 2

    You misread the AC. The AC claims that Clarkson was at the time stressed out by a potentially serious medical issue (a cancer scare); not that the 'medical issue' was the late meal itself.

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/ce...

    I'm not saying that excuses him, but assuming its true, it would have been a source of major stress.

  24. Re:To be fair... by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

    ...charmless, loud-mouthed blonde twat...?

  25. The first of many by Wuhao · · Score: 2

    It is whispered that the Lead Presenter shall meet an untimely end every year, unless BBC once again appoints Lord Clarksomort.