DOJ Will Not File Charges Against Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (politico.com)
An anonymous reader writes: After FBI Director James Comey recommended not to indict Hillary Clinton for her email misconduct yesterday, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch said on Wednesday that the Justice Department has decided not to pursue charges against Hillary Clinton or her aids and that the department will close the investigation into her use of a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state. "Late this afternoon, I met with FBI Director James Comey and career prosecutors and agents who conducted the investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton's use of a personal email system during her time as Secretary of State," Lynch said in a statement on Wednesday. "I received and accepted their unanimous recommendation that the thorough, year-long investigation be closed and that no charges be brought against any individuals within the scope of the investigation."
Lack of legitimacy hasn't hampered her at all.
The same goes for
lack of morality
lack of patriotism
lack of decency
lack of conscience
Really at this point we need 7 dwarfs and a prince to rid us of her.
Nice sock puppet... Put down the mod point. (Insightful? THAT is a FUNNY mod.)
Time to reveal the Donald's secret scam:
Step 1: Get the so-called GOP nomination. Easy to fool some of the people all of the time.
Step 2: Pick a VP who loves Ford's pardon of Nixon.
Step 3: Win the election. As Con Man Donald says, "You can fool most of the people on some of the election days."
Step 4: Be himself. AKA Phuck up massively. Start a war, bankrupt the country, whatever.
Step 5: Get impeached, resign, get pardoned. (Step 2 was important.)
Step 6: PROFIT
And you thought Trump was stupid, didn't you? By the way, don't blame me. I'm sure I saw it on Twitter. That's where I get all my important news.
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
Well, we're going to have to leave it there. Clearly there are two sides to this issue: 1) balls in your mouth and 2) dicks in your ass.
After the break, we'll be joined by Eric Trump to explain why his father totally wasn't being anti-semitic by using that jew star. Then, our full panel will revisit the controversy, "Balls in your mouth, or dicks in your ass?"
Fox News. Fair and Balanced.
You are welcome on my lawn.
As someone mentioned to me, this current election is between a grandma that can't figure out her email, and a grandpa that believes everything he reads on Facebook.
Can't even decide if I wish I had a mod point to give this one, and if so, what sort of mod point it should be. (But I NEVER get any mod points, at least not in some years.)
On the one hand, I don't like unneeded profanity, but on the other hand the language isn't that strong. On the third hand, I agree with the sentiments, but on the fourth hand it scarcely seems like a constructive comment that will generate interesting discussion, and on the fifth hand it's probably feeding a troll whose comment is not visible to me and on the sixth hand FAUX "news" really is a cancer... On the seventh hand, it is pretty funny, but I guess I've run out of hands.
I'm not an octopus, you know.
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.