Slashdot Mirror


Apple To Release Public Betas of iOS 10 and macOS Sierra Today

The next version of Apple's desktop operating system, macOS Sierra, will be made available in a public beta later today. Enthusiasts can also try their hands at iOS 10, the latest version of Apple's mobile operating system today. Both the new operating system versions offer a range of new features and improvements. Sierra, for instance, features Siri voice assistant which will assist users with locating files, answering queries, and search for images and information just by asking. iOS 10 lets users write a message in their own handwriting, and has a feature called "Raise to Wake" which wakes up the device when a user picks up their iPhone. Notifications have gotten more powerful, and now show photos and videos as well. You will find the macOS Sierra preview here, and iOS 10 preview here. More information on Apple's beta program here.

88 comments

  1. First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now offering FIRST POST lessons.

  2. Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux rules! Crapple drools!

    1. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by macs4all · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Linux rules! Crapple drools!

      Honestly, I see absolutely NOTHING "drool-worthy" in the desktop environments that Linux users suffer with. Hell, ask an honest Linux user, and most will agree that the popular GUIs for Linux are generally sucktastic. Add to that the internal strife that systemd has added, and Linux is utterly ignore-able by most Mac users.

      As for Android, you honestly couldn't pay me to give up my iPhone for that Orphaned Product-Pile and Malware-Fest that is Android.

    2. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, yeah, but lets be blunt here, by the fact that you decide to call yourself "macs4all" you're also probably physically incapable of being objective about anything if Apple is involved. I prefer Android but would never call myself "Android4All".

    3. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by danomac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I had an iPhone, I feel the opposite: I love being able to use a different browser on my Android phone. You couldn't pay me to have an iPhone. Safari's rendering engine sucks, after I bought my iPhone many years ago I thought "Great! I don't need to lug my laptop around for web admin tasks!" - then found out that Safari wouldn't render pages properly. So I installed a different web browser and same thing.

      It was then I found out Apple forces all browsers on iOS to use Safari's rendering engine.

      On Android, I actually use a different (non-stock) web browser using a non-Google rendering engine with adblock installed. Can't do that on iOS.

    4. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by ilsaloving · · Score: 2

      What kind of administration do you do that would let you do meaningful work on a 5 inch screen? I'm not trying to be snide here... I'm just thinking about all the things I do, and virtually none of them are so simple that I could do that work on a miniscule mobile device.

      Some kind of GUI front end with pre-configured for various common tasks?

    5. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by macs4all · · Score: 2

      Well, yeah, but lets be blunt here, by the fact that you decide to call yourself "macs4all" you're also probably physically incapable of being objective about anything if Apple is involved. I prefer Android but would never call myself "Android4All".

      Ok, while we're being blunt: You're nothing but an Anonymous Coward.

    6. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by macs4all · · Score: 1

      What kind of administration do you do that would let you do meaningful work on a 5 inch screen? I'm not trying to be snide here... I'm just thinking about all the things I do, and virtually none of them are so simple that I could do that work on a miniscule mobile device.

      Some kind of GUI front end with pre-configured for various common tasks?

      Sounds like he's "Admin-ing" some consumer-level networking and peripheral equipment.

      IANAA (I am not an Admin), but it seems like one would use VNC to Admin. a Server, rather than a Web Application. And there are several nice VNC/RDP clients for iOS. I use "Jump", personally.

      But you're right: regardless of the OS involved, Admin-ing on a mobile screen is, um, challenging.

    7. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, sure am. I find it odd that somebody would have a problem with that on a site that constantly rails against privacy invasions. Isn't anonymity key to privacy?

    8. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Stormwatch · · Score: 2

      Hell, ask an honest Linux user, and most will agree that the popular GUIs for Linux are generally sucktastic.

      Cinnamon (Mint's main DE) is pretty decent, actually. It's not OSX, sure, but not everyone can afford Apple's stupid prices for subpar hardware.

    9. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who would pay you and why ?
      dum phuck

    10. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Honestly, I see absolutely NOTHING "drool-worthy" in the desktop environments that Linux users suffer with.

      That's why I use the command line.

    11. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I see absolutely NOTHING "drool-worthy" in the desktop environments that Linux users suffer with.

      That's why I use the command line.

      So you're posting with Lynx? How does moderation/meta-moderation work with that, I wonder?

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    12. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by tepples · · Score: 1

      It was then I found out Apple forces all browsers on iOS to use Safari's rendering engine.

      All but one. Opera Mini gets around this limit by acting as a remote display for a browser running on servers operated by Opera. It'd be like RDPing to a PC running Firefox.

    13. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, but lets be blunt here, by the fact that you decide to call yourself "macs4all" you're also probably physically incapable of being objective about anything if Apple is involved.

      Talk about judging a book by its cover.

    14. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by 110010001000 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Shipping OSX has an exploit that gives anyone root escalation privileges via a single CLI. It is really a joke of an OS, although it is pretty.

    15. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      So you're posting with Lynx? How does moderation/meta-moderation work with that, I wonder?

      I only read Slashdot at work using Windows, as my time is too valuable to waste at home. Moderation/meta-moderation are probably clickable links in Lynx.

    16. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I used Linux/BSD desktops for about 14 years before I gave up and bought a Mac. People laugh about "Just Works", but damned if it isn't true most of the time. "But what about my pet obscure feature X?" I had a few of those that were hard to give up, but once I stopped trying to make my Mac act exactly like KDE or awesome WM and started using their workflows I found myself being way more productive than I ever had been on Linux.

      I'm not an Apple fanboy: if Linux or Windows ever got sufficiently better than OS X that I could justify changing ecosystems, I'd totally be open to considering it. Realistically, though, based on the last 20 years of watching their respective user interface development, I don't think that's likely to happen.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    17. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Yup, sure am. I find it odd that somebody would have a problem with that on a site that constantly rails against privacy invasions. Isn't anonymity key to privacy?

      Normally, yes. But on Slashdot, Anonymity seems to be mostly used as a Flaming/Trolling/Ad Hominem Attack Tool.

    18. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I'm not an Apple fanboy: if Linux or Windows ever got sufficiently better than OS X that I could justify changing ecosystems, I'd totally be open to considering it. Realistically, though, based on the last 20 years of watching their respective user interface development, I don't think that's likely to happen.

      So you would agree with my assessment that OS X/macOS has, at this time, the hands-down best desktop UI overall?

    19. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      OSX definitely has usability in mind. It's the only laptop I've used that is actually usable. Sure it has flaws, but it makes Windows feel like amateur experiments. Linux UIs though, ugh, even the latest versions feel like a mix of a retro style that you know how to use but is clumsy combined with ultra modern that is obtuse and never does what you want; in some ways like Windows 8/10 with its two incompatible UIs operating at the same time.

    20. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      is this "exploit" invoking the sudo command?

      Oh noes! I have root!

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    21. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by LichtSpektren · · Score: 0

      Linux rules! Crapple drools!

      Honestly, I see absolutely NOTHING "drool-worthy" in the desktop environments that Linux users suffer with. Hell, ask an honest Linux user, and most will agree that the popular GUIs for Linux are generally sucktastic. Add to that the internal strife that systemd has added, and Linux is utterly ignore-able by most Mac users. As for Android, you honestly couldn't pay me to give up my iPhone for that Orphaned Product-Pile and Malware-Fest that is Android.

      Didn't your mother ever teach you, "if you have nothing nice to say, say nothing at all"?

      Really, I'm glad you like Macs. But I don't understand why you choose to squirt bile on every male that crossed your dominion.

    22. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That may be, but it didn't appear to be the case here. You're still going by "macs4all" and going level 12 fanboy in your posts.

    23. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Where Linux shines is in making old PCs come to life again after having been saddled by Windows.

    24. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by danomac · · Score: 1

      Back then it was mostly wifi related stuff like allowing new devices to connect. Cisco's wifi controller still has a wifi interface but I've mostly moved on to ssh for remote servers. Using VNC as someone else mentioned is a royal pain in the arse. Basic webadmin tasks is OK to do if you only have to do it once in a while.

      One of the reasons I finally turfed my flip phone way back when and got the iPhone was primarily because I liked the idea of not lugging around my laptop. That didn't work out so well for me.

    25. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Didn't your mother ever teach you, "if you have nothing nice to say, say nothing at all"?

      You must be new here.

      Oh, and it wasn't bile. But it may have been another yellow bodily fluid... ;-)

    26. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Where Linux shines is in making old PCs come to life again after having been saddled by Windows.

      That USED to be the case; but I seem to remember people on Slashdot whining a couple of years back that Linux was getting too resource-hungry to run on old hardware.

      Oh, and now most Linuces will apparently be dropping support for 32 bit x86 CPUs...

      So which is it?

    27. Re: Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No

    28. Re: Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by macs4all · · Score: 1

      No

      I wasn't talking to you, COWARD.

    29. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      I don't doubt it. I had thought the same thing when I got my iPad. Combined with a bluetooth keyboard, it actually *is* halfway decent. But "halfway" is still the key word, especially something as simple as an SSH client is a revolving door of apps where todays amazing app stops getting updated, and eventually disappears off the app store entirely. So I can get a reasonable amount of work done in a pinch, and it's possible to do basically everything, but you still end up finding it somewhat annoying compared to a regular laptop.

    30. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      At this time, I prefer the OS X UI to any other desktop UI I've used.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    31. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I can't agree with the bit about rendering pages properly. In my experience, Safari is outstanding at rendering content on small screens and I truly don't remember the last time I had trouble accessing a web page with it.

      Yes, it's annoying that other browsers are basically wrappers around WebKit. I wish that were different. But being "stuck" with Safari isn't exactly a burden.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    32. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      You assume we all want a full DE. You can find me in Open Box or awesome running a few terminal emulator sessions, and whatever ever else. Let's talk shells, terminal emulators and everything under the hood.

      DISCLAIMER 1: The way I prefer to operate a computer is my preference. I do not possess any malice or arrogance against those who prefer other things but in this case I am standing up for myself.

      DISCLAIMER 2: I do sometimes like to run Bungie with Tint2, it stays out of the way.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    33. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by mfearby · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. I used various Linux distros after Windows Vista eventually spelled the death of XP but when Ubuntu went bad, I finally decided to just buy a Mac. Never been happier. It took a little while to get past the inability to configure my WM "just so", but once I got beyond my OCD tendencies in that area, the macOS was perfect. I can't see Linux or Windows being worthy enough to entice me back for many years to come. I should finally start using Numbers, Pages, etc and stop using Open Office (which I retained as my exit strategy, but I don't think I'll be needing one quite frankly).

    34. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One is not better or worse, it is personal preference. When you start citing one as superior that is foolishness. You prefer Macs. Great. I hate them. Personal preference.

    35. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are all so happy that you are happy with you're new phone. Please contact me as I would like to use your experience in a commercial. For your response you will have a beta preview of the next Android N. You will have exclusive access to JIT, DOZE, SVELTE, VULKAN, Number Blocking, Emojis, and more! We know that your generation loves to emojis and number block. Don't forget this isn't possible without Android. Looking forward to your call to action.

    36. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      If I had to use Windows at work, I'd probably be spending lots of time on Slashdot too.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    37. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Did you imagine that I'd said otherwise?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    38. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by doccus · · Score: 1

      That may be, but it didn't appear to be the case here. You're still going by "macs4all" and going level 12 fanboy in your posts.

      He may want to change that as well. I hear that the new OS is *not* going to run on all Macs. It appears to be a case of "Macs4Some" ;-)

    39. Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to be honest though, he was replying to a comment that said, "Linux rules! Crapple drools!" So, well, that sounds like a fanboy to me also.

  3. Too bad it won't run on my iPad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple once again provides forced obsolence to their devices, including the device known as the "New iPad".

    1. Re: Too bad it won't run on my iPad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your iPad will fail to work starting today?

      My iPad gen.1 is still working, so I don't really know what you're talking about.

    2. Re:Too bad it won't run on my iPad. by macs4all · · Score: 2

      Apple once again provides forced obsolence to their devices, including the device known as the "New iPad".

      Um, Every product is "The New..." at SOME point. Then it isn't.

      This is the first version of iOS for which my iPad 2 is incompatible. I consider that quite reasonable. It IS compatible with iOS 9, and it will be several years before that is "impossibly too old". Until then, (and even after that point), my iPad 2 will happily chug along, just like it has since my employer gifted it to me several years ago.

    3. Re:Too bad it won't run on my iPad. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Linux once again provides forced obsolence <sic> to my i386 devices.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Too bad it won't run on my iPad. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      It IS compatible with iOS 9, and it will be several years before that is "impossibly too old".

      I had a 1st gen iPod Touch that lasted eight years until the battery died. Used it as a Kindle reader. I'm not surprised that the iPad 2 isn't getting updated. I'm planning to retire my iPad2 as an alarm clock with an air raid siren when I get another iPad in the future.

    5. Re:Too bad it won't run on my iPad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, those bastards don't want to support ass-old hardware that doesn't have the horsepower to actually have a good experience running brand new software.

      If they did release it for your ass-old hardware, you'd just bitch that it's slow as hell.

      TL;DR: You just want to bitch, no matter what it is Apple does. Go away.

    6. Re:Too bad it won't run on my iPad. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Apple once again provides forced obsolence to their devices, including the device known as the "New iPad".

      You call it forced obsolescence, we call it a software upgrade. And unlike MS, Apple doesn't have to vainly nag us to install it and users don't feel motivated to do whatever they can to avoid installing it.

    7. Re:Too bad it won't run on my iPad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, those bastards don't want to support ass-old hardware that doesn't have the horsepower to actually have a good experience running brand new sluggish bloatware.

      There, FTFY.

  4. Made to sound like a social disease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A genuine example of one, too. Ugly. Older.

  5. Further cloud integration? by Chromium_One · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Storage space maxed out? No problem. macOS Sierra can help make more room by automatically storing rarely used files in the cloud and keeping them available on demand. It can also help you find and remove old files you no longer use. So there’s always room on your Mac for new files and the ones you’ve used most recently."

    Uhm, no. I do NOT want or need anyone managing my storage for me, or to deal with service outages leaving my files unavailable. Thanks, but no thanks. Take your cloud service and shove it sideways up your ass until you can taste it.

    --
    When you live in a sick society, just about everything you do is wrong.
    1. Re:Further cloud integration? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Hopefully this feature is optional and not enabled by default.

    2. Re:Further cloud integration? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I agree that it should not be enabled by default, but I also think it sounds useful if you have decent internet service.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Further cloud integration? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Those guys out there in California don't know what it's like to live in the area of the country where in 2016, I have only 1.5Mbps (ATT) service. And their equipment is so old that no one makes it anymore - the techs are using boards from neighborhoods that have been upgraded to UVerse.

      And here - ATT is it or I have to get a $99 package from Concast that'll double in price in a year. And there is having to do business with Concast. If I had to resort to that, I'd have to make a template for complaints to my public service commission.

    4. Re:Further cloud integration? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      "Storage space maxed out? No problem. macOS Sierra can help make more room by automatically storing rarely used files in the cloud and keeping them available on demand. It can also help you find and remove old files you no longer use. So there’s always room on your Mac for new files and the ones you’ve used most recently."

      Uhm, no. I do NOT want or need anyone managing my storage for me, or to deal with service outages leaving my files unavailable. Thanks, but no thanks. Take your cloud service and shove it sideways up your ass until you can taste it.

      From what I have read about "Storage Optimization", All that stuff is OPTIONAL. I personally don't use ANY Apple (or anyone else's) Cloud services.

    5. Re:Further cloud integration? by swb · · Score: 2

      Transparent, user-configurable and multi-cloud tiered storage is very useful.

      Non-transparent, non-configurable and single-vendor tiered storage is an awful thing designed to jack up fees for users, spy on their data and an excuse to overprice under-sized local storage on vendor hardware offerings.

    6. Re:Further cloud integration? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      So don't turn it on. Simple. Despite my handle there are a number of things that I would change about Apple, especially iOS. The quality of their products has started to go downhill over the last four or five years where they are focusing on the new shiny things and leaving everything else to stagnate. They have also lost the focus on keeping software easy to use in order to cram more features in. For example in the Music app on the iPhone it used to be very easy to change the volume if you were holding it one handed, a swipe. Now you have to change the hold on your phone or go through a number of steps.

      But I've never been forced to use their iCloud Drive storage or any other part of their cloud service. It's always been a prompt asking me if I wanted to turn it on and when I've clicked on no there has been no issues.

    7. Re:Further cloud integration? by swb · · Score: 1

      The whole technology industry has gone downhill.

      Fixes to bugs and problems has been changed to "new version releases" which in many cases means buying the product again.

      Useful innovation has dropped off enormously in favor of changes designed to monetize users.

    8. Re:Further cloud integration? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      But I've never been forced to use their iCloud Drive storage or any other part of their cloud service. It's always been a prompt asking me if I wanted to turn it on and when I've clicked on no there has been no issues.

      Apple's been on a cloud/no-cloud path of late - they know you might not want any cloud stuff so they will ask if you want to turn it on or off. But if you do have it on, Apple wants to make sure you see a benefit so it's not just a way for companies to scrape user data to harvest information.

      The reason is Apple is on a privacy bent, seeing that's the Achilles' heel of Android and the Google ecosystem (and to a lesser extent, Amazon). They don't want your information, but they also know they can provide useful services people expect. It's why an iTunes encrypted back remains the only backup solution that has everything - Apple purposefully does not store credential information to iCloud (where it might be subject to law enforcement actions, which might compromise not just your iCloud data, but also all your other accounts if they stored it).

      And non-encrypted iTunes data doesn't credentials either, for obvious reasons.

    9. Re:Further cloud integration? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Under-flipping-rated

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    10. Re:Further cloud integration? by jittles · · Score: 1

      "Storage space maxed out? No problem. macOS Sierra can help make more room by automatically storing rarely used files in the cloud and keeping them available on demand. It can also help you find and remove old files you no longer use. So there’s always room on your Mac for new files and the ones you’ve used most recently."

      Uhm, no. I do NOT want or need anyone managing my storage for me, or to deal with service outages leaving my files unavailable. Thanks, but no thanks. Take your cloud service and shove it sideways up your ass until you can taste it.

      I'd probably have more space if Apple cleaned up after itself! I was looking through my ~/AppData/Roaming/Apple and ~/AppData/Local/Apple folders last night and found apple using over ~40GB of space on my machine for iOS crash dumps (sync'ed automatically via iTunes) (10GB), the last 5 years of iTunes installers (2GB), iPhone OS images (15GB for several different models over 4 or 5 years), iPad OS Images (2GB, I only had two different model iPads in that time), and a bunch of DMG files that I could not determine their purpose.

      Switch over to my work MacBook Pro and I had 80GB in ~/Library/Developer of just old simulator images installed with each release of XCode.

    11. Re:Further cloud integration? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 for microsoft who seems to be actively discouraging users from using their OneDrive.

  6. Hardware Refresh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they going to refresh the ancient hardware on the Mac Pro, Macbook Pro, Air or iMac lines anytime soon or are they strictly a netbook/tablet/phone company now?

  7. uglyCASE by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    I actually don't want to ever hear about OSX again, just because the new word is ugly.

    1. Re:uglyCASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, it's called macOS now so you won't be hearing about OS X again. And their other operating systems are called iOS, tvOS and watchOS.

    2. Re:uglyCASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!

      The new camera feature takes high res pictures of Tim Cooks asshole. Picture it.

    3. Re:uglyCASE by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Everything old is new again....

      Us old Mac folks remember MacOS, which is what they called it when the Mac clones came out. They went back to System 7, and System 8, 9.

    4. Re:uglyCASE by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      It was always Mac OS from version 8, until the "OS X" branding that came along around 10.8 or so. the first 8 versions of OS X were officially "Mac OS X v10.[0-7]"

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  8. So... by Z80a · · Score: 1

    Does it run police quest and red baron well?

    1. Re:So... by armanox · · Score: 1

      I'll settle for Kings Quest.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    2. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather settle for the women in Leisure Suit Larry, in glorious EGA-palette 16 colours.

  9. Handwriting? by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    iOS 10 lets users write a message in their own handwriting

    Does this mean Nelson will finally be able to beat up Martin? Although I guess Martha will be dissappointed.

    1. Re:Handwriting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean Nelson will finally be able to beat up Martin? Although I guess Martha will be dissappointed.

      It was Dolph not Nelson who wrote Beat Up Martin on his Newton.

  10. Apple's long beta cycle by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0

    Based on my recent past experience, you can expect the public beta cycle to begin now and continue into early next year. The last couple of public betas will have the identifiers iOS 10.0.x and iOS 10.1.x.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  11. In Depth Review on Ars by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

    ArsTechnica has a decent review, even though its still beta

  12. what's in a name.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or rather, a version number.

    i think it's really funny that after microsoft releases the 'last version of windows', windows 10, last summer.. an obvious copy of apple's long-running osx... first chance apple gets to dump "osx" (their version '10'.. used since 2001), they do.

    all hail mac os vista.. err i mean.. sierra.

  13. Unlocked bootloader by tepples · · Score: 1

    The difference between iOS dropping old devices and what Canonical is doing to Ubuntu in the 16.10-18.04 cycle is that PC users can jump ship to another GNU/Linux distribution that keeps i386 support active. With an iPad, on the other hand, you're stuck with whatever iOS distribution Apple signs.

    1. Re:Unlocked bootloader by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That's true but also pretty irrelevant. Why in the world would someone buy an Apple product if they have an expectation of infinite software updates? It's not like Apple has suddenly changed policy.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Unlocked bootloader by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then perhaps I misconstrued the presence or absence of hidden meaning in your comment. I took "Linux once again provides forced [obsolescence] to my i386 devices" to mean "which makes it no better than Apple". To be clear: is this what you intended?

    3. Re:Unlocked bootloader by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I was mocking his whiny tone and trying to be funny. Linux may be "better" than Apple in this regard, but it is still a matter of degree. Old hardware won't be supported forever, no matter what your platform is. Apple is better than most vendors at supporting older devices - I'm still getting software updates for my late 2008 MacBook Pro. I mean, damn. But hardware-wise, they won't even sell me a new battery since it falls outside of their 5-year support policy. Eventually they won't bother compiling OSX for my laptop and I'll have to live with the latest version that runs, which they generally keep updating for 3 versions. So at this stage I may very well have software updates for an 11-year-old laptop before they finally pull the plug... that's just silly.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  14. I would immediatel install it on their pro machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IF THEY HAD ANY!

  15. Mac is nice but I am not all in by slack_justyb · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Being a Mac and Linux user for sometime, I like working on my Mac but it is not my "go to" system and macOS will ensure that it stays that way. So a disclaimer, I am a programmer, so the majority of my work is not Photoshop or whatever grade A software everyone touts about as working perfectly on Mac. Compilers and mostly command line and IDE tools are what I mostly work with and things like Eclipse, Atom, and so on work pretty well across platforms. So I do get real work done on either platform. I get that's not the majority of users but at the same time I am not going to be able to relate to all the crazies out there that are like, "ZOMG, Linux has no Photoshop, you CAN'T DO ANYTHING!!!11!111one1111!!!!". What kind of work I get done on each platform is not the point I am going to be going for though if you bear with me for a bit.

    Mac and its ecosystem are nice, but that is also the catch. A lot of the new features with macOS talk about how seamlessly it works for iPhone, iPad, Apple watch, and so on. In other words, those features don't exist unless you have those things. Additionally, you don't get cloud integration unless you are using their cloud. That's 5GB free and the pricing while reasonable does mean that you need to pay that per month/year to access that feature built into the OS as well. Also, the notes, calendar (to a lesser extent), mail (again to a lesser extent), maps, photo, and on and on applications only work well so long as you use that application. You can transfer your stuff from Evernote to Apple's notes, but you can only use Apple's notes on Apple's stuff. Using Evernote or some other program works across platforms but it's not "optimize" or doesn't integrate well into the OS. And there's several other examples where it's Apple's ecosystem or a less than ideal experience or just some features of the OS just don't happen.

    And that's what ultimately puts me off from Apple as the "go to" system, why am I buying (which I only did once and man my Apple has been kicking for quite some years now) this hardware and OS for features I'll never get to use unless I get deeper into the ecosystem? Perhaps if I already had an iPhone (I don't) or an Apple Watch (I'm an old fuddy duddy who likes ticking watches still) some of this would make more sense. But I'm not that person and maybe it is just me but I do not feel like I should have to be that type of person in order to get all the features from my hardware/OS. I get that macOS does "more" in a sense than say my Linux box, but I get 100% of my Linux box and maybe that biases me toward it more often than not for things like gaming, programming, and just randomly looking at cat videos on the Internet. The Mac is nice, but I'm never going to use notes or photos the way Apple wants me to use them because I am just not going to go that deep into their ecosystem.

    So all that said, seeing macOS tout more/tighter integration of their ecosystem and hardware into the mix of their OS is just off putting to me, and that may only extend as far as me for all it is worth. I get that this is the way things are moving, until they stop moving in that direction one day. However, I just don't see the justification for the cost of getting everything Apple just to get those features. I have an Android phone and use Dropbox for files, whatever the thing is with Google for photos and what-not, and my music comes from Amazon/Google/Apple depending on whatever I'm signed into at the time I decide to buy something. Netflix and HBO have mostly supplanted my need for videos (maybe I'm just tired of the stuff that comes out now a days). All of that works pretty well across whatever devices I use, so there's even less reason to just drop everything and move to Apple. That brings me to the point, macOS is really built for people who aren't in any ecosystem right now or people who are already Mac deep. It's not bringing anything that says to people Android/Linux/Windows entrenched, "Hey this is something you'd drop who you have now for us!" And t

  16. Keep in mind.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bluetooth keyboards have both the possibility of being snooped on over the air, as well as having enough memory/storage to record statistics on the highest probability keystrokes for snooping out your password.

    Relying on them for applications is fine, but be aware they could be hazardous to the long term security of password based local/network services.

  17. Have you tried Ubuntu Unity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Enlightenment E17 or E20?

    1. Re:Have you tried Ubuntu Unity? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I've got a soft spot in my heart for E, but it's a fond memory from my past and not in my present (or likely future). OS X encompasses a lot more than just the UI - more like KDE than E - including stuff like reasonably reliable cloud sync; a services architecture that's actually used (click on a date in an email to create a scheduled event in the calendar app of my choosing); Wi-Fi that always comes back up after hibernation; erm, hibernation itself; tight integration between desktop apps and their mobile counterparts; user-friendly backup and restore; tons of commercial apps; etc.

      I've gotten several of those to work in Linux through lots of tinkering, but ain't nobody got time for that. Or at least I don't. None of those are hypothetically impossible in Linux but my impression is that the ecosystem doesn't have them today. I'd rather buy a nice desktop OS than invest the time required to make myself happy on another Linux desktop. Don't get me wrong: all that tinkering's been great for my career as I learned way more than I'd ever planned on deep OS internals! It's just that I'm ready to move on to other challenges than futzing around with my desktop config before I can get work done.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  18. Re:I would immediatel install it on their pro mach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop lying, you would not.

    If Apple had a true pro machine, you'd just bitch about the price!