Slashdot Mirror


Ashley Madison Admits It Lured Customers With 70,000 Fake 'Fembots' (arstechnica.com)

America's Federal Trade Commission is now investigating the "infidelity hookup site" Ashley Madison. In a possibly-related development, an anonymous reader writes: Ashley Madison's new executive team "admits that it used fembots to lure men into paying to join the site," reports Arts Technica. More than 75% of the site's customers were convinced to join by an army of 70,000 fembot accounts, "created in dozens of languages by data entry workers...told to populate these accounts with fake information and real photos posted by women who had shut down their accounts on Ashley Madison or other properties owned by Ashley Madison's parent company, Avid Life Media... In reality, that lady was a few lines of PHP... In internal company e-mails, executives discussed openly that only about five percent of the site's members were real females."
The company only abandoned the practice in 2015, and CNN also reports that for years, if the site's male customers complained, Ashley Madison "threatened to send paperwork to users' homes if they disputed their bills -- potentially revealing cheaters to their spouses," while one user complained that the site also automatically signed up customers for recurring billing. "We are not threatening you. We are laying the facts to you..." one e-mail read, while another warned that "We do fight all charge backs."

23 of 92 comments (clear)

  1. This is unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was promised real fembots!

  2. Fraud on a massive scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, they are all in jail, right?

    1. Re:Fraud on a massive scale by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The fembot code might be running from a jail on the server.

    2. Re: Fraud on a massive scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The execs still have money, so no.

  3. A few lines of PHP wouldn't turn me on by jader3rd · · Score: 4, Funny

    I prefer compile time, type safe checked languages.

    1. Re:A few lines of PHP wouldn't turn me on by John+Allsup · · Score: 2

      It is actually quite fun being chatted up by a fembot. It is funny how they all say the same things, and how often the apparently live up the road.

      --
      John_Chalisque
    2. Re:A few lines of PHP wouldn't turn me on by Wuhao · · Score: 4, Funny

      I used to be a really big stickler for type safety... but these PHP bots are just so dynamic, and just between you and me, they let you get to root so much more quickly. I feel like with some of them, you barely have to go five minutes before she's almost begging you to inject your SQL.

  4. Re:Who knew... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't remember any blow jobs, but it's sure fucked me plenty of times.

  5. Re:Who knew... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't remember any blow jobs, but it's sure fucked me plenty of times.

    No, no, no. That's Javascript.

  6. How surprising! by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 5, Funny

    An infidelity site is run by lying and cheating scumbags? Who could have predicted that?

    1. Re:How surprising! by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      An infidelity site is run by lying and cheating scumbags? Who could have predicted that?

      I can't believe someone would lie on the internet, especially about sex and double-especially if it involved money.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  7. Still not bankrupt?! by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The most surprising thing is that this site is still in business - apparently many people (presumably mostly men) care about getting laid more than about anything else.

    Almost a year ago, a massive data breach put all the details of would-be cheaters out in the open. Result: lots of publicity, and an increase in membership numbers.

    The same file, upon analyses, showed very few women on the site. Still, people continued to join the site.

    The suspicion of using bots I heard about back then already, where new registered people would start to receive inviting messages from women the moment they signed up, but to read them or reply or whatever they had to start paying for the site. Yet, membership continued to rise.

    It must be a pretty sad bunch that signs up for that site. No wonder the real girls stay clear of it.

    1. Re:Still not bankrupt?! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      It's a great scam because no one is willing to sue them fit lying, ripping them off it leaking their data.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Still not bankrupt?! by taustin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Are they any dating sites that don't do the same thing?

      The reality of dating web sites is that all the pictures of women are real, but the profiles are fake, and all the profiles of men are real, but the pictures are fake.

    3. Re:Still not bankrupt?! by louic · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think sites like match.com are highly manipulative.

      You ain't seen nothing yet. Wait until you meet a real women.

  8. OMG, passed the Turing test! by Steve1952 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is actually a huge development in computer science. These "few lines of PHP" passed the Turing test on a massive scale. Artificial intelligence is now here!

  9. Suspicion by burtosis · · Score: 2

    The ever relevant xkcd

  10. This is old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had a friend who worked at Webcapades, the company behind Eroticy, an adult friend finder competitor. The tech they had for collecting Personal information and using it to fake personal communications was incredible. Over time they would collect names of pets, family members, etc, and this data would go into a database.

    My friends job, as a 'community manager' was to maintain 50+ profiles of fake people. A fair chunk of their time was spent choosing a profile, selecting a huge list of people that profile had ever interacted with, and then writing a mass email. Based on the users selected, the message tool would list what data tokens were available for all the selected users. As my friend crafted the mail blast, they would insert tokens that would be replaced with personal information tailored to each recipient. This was in 2003, so you can imagine how much more advanced the tech for faking profiles has gotten.

  11. Re:So, let me get this straight... by Megol · · Score: 2

    In some places sex workers are completely legal, being unionized and having political representation. IMHO that is what to strive for - why make one kind of service so different to all other services that are provided? [Well the answer are Christians, "protectors of morality" and "protectors of women" - even though a huge portion of sex workers are men and the morality of not allowing sex services are iffy at best]

    Now forcing people to sell sex in any way should have serious consequences, treating each forced sexual interaction as a rape seems reasonable.

  12. Not just getting laid by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    there are a lot of lonely guys out there. A lot of 'em stuck in loveless marriages for financial reasons, mostly because of kids. If I had a dollar for every couple married because they dropped a kid I'd be a billionaire.

    Oh, and lots of people never learn to be cynical. It's a weird thought when you're a nerd because you learn cynicism at an early age when you're peers turn on you because when your better grades get you praise from teacher but you can't run as fast on the playground.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  13. False advertising? by SilverBlade2k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Shouldn't the FCC (or other government-run agency) shut down this site for blatant false advertising?

    No dating/hookup sits should have fembots or fake profiles just to lure men in. Every profile should have a real, paying person behind it. Period. Anything else is simply false advertisement.

    1. Re:False advertising? by swb · · Score: 2

      That would be the FTC, the group nominally oriented towards making sure business practices are legitimate.

      Ideally the FTC would have a much larger and more vigorous enforcement arm whose job it was to audit and punish firms suspected of fraudulent business practices.

      Dating sites would be just one more business category where they could audit for suspicious business practices such as fake profiles, phony gender ratios, and dishonest success rates.

      It's always bothered me that both American society at large and government has such a very soft attitude towards dishonest business practices, aka "salesmanship". It seems to be broadly accepted that it's OK to make false, misleading or dishonest claims about products and services. Transparency is clearly important to well-running markets, yet we seem to be just fine with non-transparent markets and sellers who make false and misleading claims.

  14. Re:The ultimate Honeys pot by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    While the victims are not innocent. They were tricked into it. Much like in entrapment (An illegal activity in the US where law enforcement tries to pressure someone into breaking a law so they can bust them). So for some of these people they mad had been going threw some hard times and those bots seemed to fill whatever void that were looking for, thinking it was a real person.
    Most people after making a long term commitment have a tendency to reflect if life was better if I did X differently. Then there is a "person" seeming really to show you that SO that you could of had des if you just waited a bit longer.
    Now most people are mature enough to remember all the pain and confususion going threw their life at the time and realize it is a bad idea combined if you had any feelings towards your SO how much pain you will cause her if they found out.
    But having these bots to trick you is breaking up relationships that may had survived after that period of angst.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.