Google Gets Land For Its Futuristic Headquarters, Thanks To LinkedIn Deal (arstechnica.com)
An anonymous reader writes from a report via Ars Technica: Silicon Valley Business Journal reports that Google and LinkedIn have worked out a deal that will allow the two neighbors to swap a few million square feet of real estate. The deal will help give Google enough room to build its futuristic "canopy" campus. Ars Technica reports: "Google will receive all of LinkedIn's existing Mountain View territory, which consists of LinkedIn's 370,000-square-feet headquarters and almost eight acres of land LinkedIn had planned on turning into office space. LinkedIn will move a few miles across town into four office buildings currently owned by Google that come out to about 750,000 square feet of office space. LinkedIn instantly gets to double its office space while avoiding a costly 'five- to six-year' construction project, and Google gets the space and building rights it needs to build its crazy indoor/outdoor spiderweb canopy utopia. Google owns a huge chunk of land in Mountain View with many office buildings, but the buildings have all been hand-me-downs. In February 2015, Google announced plans to renovate its campus with an ambitious design featuring a large membrane covering configurable activity space. To expand, both LinkedIn and Google needed to compete for Mountain View's 2.2 million square feet of available commercial square footage. The city, fearing it would become an all-Google town, awarded the majority of the construction rights -- 1.4 million square feet -- to LinkedIn, leaving Google with nowhere to build its new headquarters. With the real estate swap, those construction rights go to Google, so the company now has all the space it asked for." Last month, Microsoft announced plans to acquired LinkedIn for $26.2 billion.
Nowhere left to go but up or east.
Mountain View has been destroyed and the lives of the residents destroyed by Google. Hopefully the city will destroy this sale of construction rights to stop this Google attack on us.
Stopping their growth is not enough and this is just hateful for Microsoft to do his.
When a company moves into brand new headquarters, it usually spells the beginning of the end.
Seems to happen a lot anyway.
I can't wait to see what goes down when Logan finally escapes from this thing.
Slashdot pretty much sucks right now. Good users leave because abusive moderators mod their good posts to -1. Many users have told me they've left because they're tired of legitimate posts being modded down to -1 while trolls and ridiculous memes get modded up. Moderation is useless but the default settings hide posts below 1, effectively censoring posts that have been improperly modded down. If Slashdot wants to improve the quality of discussion and keep good users around, get rid of moderators.
the looting of Linkedin begins
Rick B.
And so does Google, and so does Microsoft.
So what is the actual news? Will any of them be alive tomorrow?
Every time a high tech company builds a new 'amazing' campus their stock falls soon after.
Seagate
Oracle
Yahoo
nNvidia
AMD
Microsoft
Apple (in the 90's)
and so on...
If there's one thing I learned from the new Apple campus discussion, when a company does this, they are about to tank.
Oh well, at least this one won't be missed.
I don't rape children so I lost any interest of working at Google.
Just why googlers are so weird?
If you've read Parkinson's Law (and you should!) you'd know that institutions begin their decline just at the time they move into their perfect, palatial quarters.
See subject: Ask them WHY they don't let you see WHO issued downmods on you - their bs answer? "We'd have 'flame wars'" well you have them ANYHOW morons... no, the real reason? They don't WANT you to see how it REALLY works around here - sockpuppets galore, furthering the agenda of those sponsoring this place (advertisers)...
* Everyone knows it...
(They do NOT want you to see the pattern of those doing it, & then to get on their asses for it... pitiful: This is the PROVINCE of what I call "not men" (weasels in other words) in this world - operating behind the scenes in the shadows AND under "fake names" online too...)
APK
P.S.=> Prepare for a flurry of bs after my post of total bullshit - it's what you get when you tell "uncomfortable truths" here, or really ANYWHERE online that upsets the "powers that be" (not so powerful, lol - I run rings around the bs they direct my way easily) on any forums that is paid off by corporate entities to further their interests via crowd psychology methods... apk
for another fascinating episode of Commercial Real Estate Headlines?
Google copies Apple (and their 'space ship' campus). The day google does something innovative is the day the earth will crack in two.
Your post is hidden and receives a lower rating because you are hiding in anonymity. You are allowed to do that, but you do not get favoritism in moderation because of it. User accounts subject to Karma DO get favoritism in that regard, _IF_ they maintain high enough Karma to have the bonus and decide to keep it on.
Nobody hides your post you turd! Good grief, anyone can browse at -1 and see even your drivel. The moderation guidelines used to recommend that you do browse at -1 (I'm not going to look, you are the one whining so you can check). This is so that people who moderate can fix shilling/sock-puppetry/malicious moderation.
As a person who has been here using a login account for a very very long time I will happily tell you that there are moderation problems. You have no fucking clue what they are, or at least didn't present a single one here, but they exist. People and companies with multiple accounts who cheat to gain mod points for example is a valid complaint. You whining in all these posts about how abused you are as you hide in the anonymous basement is not.
Want good higher ranking posts at the time you submit? Use a named account, and don't post whiny rants. Don't want a name account, STFU.
No, I won't respond to further trolling.
-The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.
Yay.
When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
I can do this already, when I feel like it. No Goople needed.
I'm betting, all told, Google and Linked in pay about $200 in actual taxes and fees to Mountain View proper, for in the US, the bigger the corporation, the less they actually pay to support their physical presence (i.e., 'company town').
Why do so many tech companies insist on locating themselves in neighborhoods where a modest house costs $3 million? There are countless cities with reasonable costs of living, surely they could still attract lots of qualified people there?