Slashdot Mirror


Germany To Require 'Black Box' in Autonomous Cars (reuters.com)

Autonomous cars should be able to account for themselves, that's the thinking behind new legislation proposed by German's transport ministry. The country is planning new laws that require self-driving cars to include a black box, Reuters reports, similar to the flight recorder required on aircraft. From the report: The fatal crash of a Tesla Motors Inc Model S car in its Autopilot mode has increased the pressure on industry executives and regulators to ensure that automated driving technology can be deployed safely. Under the proposal from Transport Minister Alexander Dobrindt, drivers will not have to pay attention to traffic or concentrate on steering, but must remain seated at the wheel so they can intervene in the event of an emergency. Manufacturers will also be required to install a black box that records when the autopilot system was active, when the driver drove and when the system requested that the driver take over, according to the proposals. The draft is due to be sent to other ministries for approval this summer, a transport ministry spokesman said.

56 comments

  1. Need to stay on for some time after auto cut out by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Need to stay on for some time after auto cut out so they can't just stop logging right before an crash

  2. Black box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here we go with the racist comments again. Why not a white box.

    #BlackBoxesMatter

    1. Re:Black box by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      There are bright orange now days.

    2. Re:Black box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get your woman to a gynecologist. If it's orange, there is something seriously wrong.

    3. Re:Black box by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      Get your woman to a gynecologist. If it's orange, there is something seriously wrong.

      For sure, that means he's married to Doanld Trump.

    4. Re:Black box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speak for yourself; I'd certainly want black box in my car.

      Apparently, having it installed lets the car ride on time. Ho ho ho! (Ahem)

      (Not even getting into smutty crap about black boxes and "I'd ride her on time!" etc etc. Oh, hang on, I just did. And yeah, I know she didn't actually sing on the track, but she can mime to it, so whatever...)

  3. Autonomous cars? by PvtVoid · · Score: 2

    All cars should have black boxes.

    1. Re:Autonomous cars? by Nkwe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      All cars should have black boxes.

      I think that all if not most new cars do have data recorders (black boxes), the question is: What should these data recorders record, and who should have access to the recordings? There is a wide possible spectrum. I would tend to agree with you if we required storage of the last few minutes of mechanical parameters likely to indicate the cause of a crash and make this data only accessible via a court order. I would tend not to agree with you if the data recorders stored months of mechanical data, computer logs, GPS history of where the car has been, video and audio of the drivers actions and or if this data was routinely uploaded to the cloud with no restrictions on access or monetization.

    2. Re:Autonomous cars? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Why? So everyone can be tracked everywhere they go and have no choice in the matter? You do realize that they'll have GPS tracks recorded, too, don't you? Are you eager to have the government up your ass even more than they already are?

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    3. Re: Autonomous cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My car has _two_ black boxes, soft and with white dots, hanging from the rear view mirror. Does that count?

    4. Re:Autonomous cars? by NotInHere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The usual way to do black boxes is to just record stuff, not sending it anywhere. If there is an accident, the black box data can be read out and the person causing the accident be found out more easily and effectively. That's a good thing IMO. Even if the black box in your own car is used to convict you, its a good system.

      Now, as we live in 2016, probably the black box will be designed in a way that it transmits the data live to the manufacturer, maybe even with kill switches. That's a bad thing, and I don't like it. Or take tesla's ability to OTA update the car software. this is just dangerous.

      So generally, I agree with black boxes, but do not agree with internet connected black boxes. Cars are not planes, they don't get lost at the bottom of the sea. (I do agree with internet connected black boxes for planes).

    5. Re:Autonomous cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I have read access to all that, I'd gladly opt-in... (I really do want a record for my own personal reasons).

    6. Re:Autonomous cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All cars should have black boxes.

      So "All Cars Matter" then?

    7. Re:Autonomous cars? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think the most important question is if the data needs to be sourced independently from the vehicle control logic-- a redundant sensor on the "gas pedal," as an example. I don't get a warm-fuzzy when Tesla says that the user depressed the throttle to 97% without knowing that it is independent.

    8. Re:Autonomous cars? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      So generally, I agree with black boxes

      See, here's the problem with 'black boxes' in cars to start with: Some insurance companies are already trying to push something similar in exchange for a discount. However it shouldn't be any of their business where you're driving your car. At present you can say 'no' to these tracking devices. If 'black boxes' became mandated, then insurance companies would push for, and get, access to their contents, and with it a complete record of your whereabouts. We're already tracked online, there's already cameras and license plate scanners all over the place, and through various mechanisms your purchasing habits are already being tracked, too. Having your insurance company tsk-tsk you for where and when you drive your car is just going way too far.

      As an aside to this, did you know that many trucking companies record video and audio inside the cabs of their trucks, to monitor and review their drivers' expressions and what they might say, as well as the usual GPS tracking of where they go, how fast, etc? You can get fired for uttering something that they consider a sign of 'road rage', or even having an expression on your face that they don't like.

      If 'black boxes' became mandated in all vehicles, it's not that much further to putting audio and video recording inside all vehicles, too, 'for safety purposes', of course. I've already shown you the precedent for it in the commercial sector. These things always seem to come on in small increments, so nobody really notices until it's too late. Would you really want to live in a world where you can't even drive your own car without someone watching you and listening to you do it, and knowing where and when you're doing it? No thanks, and anyone that thinks that's OK is either not appreciative of how invasive and creepy it would be, or they're just not right in the head to start with.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    9. Re:Autonomous cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All cars should have black boxes.

      I believe that most all cars built after 1994 have one. They may not log everything the modern ones do, but they do have one.

    10. Re: Autonomous cars? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      My car has _two_ black boxes, soft and with white dots, hanging from the rear view mirror. Does that count?

      Only if it's a garish coloured early 70s Cadillac with leopard print upholstery, and you're a pimp.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    11. Re:Autonomous cars? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Not in the EU. The insurance companies have no right to data you do not voluntarily provide them.

    12. Re:Autonomous cars? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Under EU laws any data in a black box would be protected by every entity handling it, with complaints of abuse or misuse backed up by some pretty tough laws (which are soon to get even tougher, benefiting the consumer). Data can't just be sent anywhere under EU law - there has to be a reason for having it, a reason for sending it to anyone, a reason for processing it, etc. If any one of those steps has an issue, the data subject can cause merry hell.

    13. Re:Autonomous cars? by bozzy · · Score: 1

      Everybody, eeeeeeverybody, everybody eeeeeeeeeverybody should have a black box! Ow.

  4. Misleading headline by drdread66 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WTF? The headline makes it seem like this is a done deal, but the text makes it clear this is legislation proposed by one of the govt ministries.

    An accurate headline would read "German transportation ministry proposed requirement for black boxes in autonomous vehicles."

    SMH.

    1. Re:Misleading headline by Eloking · · Score: 1

      WTF? The headline makes it seem like this is a done deal, but the text makes it clear this is legislation proposed by one of the govt ministries.

      An accurate headline would read "German transportation ministry proposed requirement for black boxes in autonomous vehicles."

      SMH.

      *Gasp*

      A misguiding headline on Slashdot?!? Who would have thought!! I'm so surprised and upset right now!!

      --
      Elok
    2. Re:Misleading headline by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      A proper headline would require thoughtfulness. Too much to ask. I guess some think they are clever when coming up with click bait headlines, but they come off as idiots.

    3. Re:Misleading headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >SMH

      you mean baka, surely

    4. Re: Misleading headline by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      It is a proposal by Mr. Dobrindt who has a track record in failing and proposing ridiculous laws (even though black boxes would be a good idea, but they are also very common nowadays in modern more expensive cars). Anyway, it will most likely fail.

  5. This seems perfectly reasonable. by barc0001 · · Score: 1

    Nothing much to add, frankly ALL cars should have a black box that records telemetry for a rolling 5 minute period and can be examined after a crash.

    1. Re:This seems perfectly reasonable. by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Many already do, including Tesla.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  6. Who controls the data and access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it owned by the car owner? Can government or manufacturer access data without due process? In USA, could this be violation of 4th amendment or could car owner turn off data logging? When can the data be demanded: for speeding, running a stop sign, illegal parking, illegal lane change, violating private property (trespassing), or only fatal crash or what? How to prove or determine if data recorded is CALIBRATED and ACCURATE? Speedometer will give wrong reading if different size tires are used. Will insurance companies demand access to set or raise rates?

    1. Re:Who controls the data and access? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

      I would like to see a hard ass judge hold some one from the car manufacturer in contempt of court for trying to pull some NDA / EULA bs.

      Even more so in a criminal vehicular homicide case.

    2. Re:Who controls the data and access? by thoromyr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If such a device is ever installed on vehicles in the US then, no matter what the rules/laws might be at the time of inception, they will in short order certainly:

      1. require citizens comply with law enforcement request for a data dump
      2. criminalize tampering/disabling logging
      3. be considered infallible by those consulting them
      4. be utilized by insurance companies to obtain discounts

      In the interests of protecting privacy, the interface will be proprietary and secret, thus conveniently preventing owners from doing their own data dumps. A grey market in readers will develop.

      It also would likely form an entry point for: putting GPS on all vehicles to enable ore accurate road taxes; a remote kill switch for public safety (think of Nice, France); and a transponder for emergency assistance/stolen vehicle recovery

      I don't see how anything could go wrong with this

    3. Re:Who controls the data and access? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      1. require citizens comply with law enforcement request for a data dump

      Replace citizens with manufacturers / renters / owners with chain of custody rules in place. Also add civil courts as well as the defense have there own look.

      2. criminalize tampering/disabling logging

      And must be in an open format / can be read with out needing dealer only tools / software

      3. be considered infallible by those consulting them

      Till you hit sometime like the Volkswagen cover up also in a court case having your own independent lab look at it.

      4. be utilized by insurance companies to obtain discounts??

      What will insurance be like with auto driver cars?

    4. Re:Who controls the data and access? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      In the EU the subject of the data is in full control. Each entity which collects data must inform the user of what is being collected and precisely why. Collecting something else or using it in a different way can result in prosecution (max. â300,000 Euro fine, will be increased in the updated regulations to 5% global turnover or â20,000,000, whichever is higher). Any third-party using this data (which would have been agreed to by the data subject themselves) also has to abide by these rules. Every data handler is subjected to spot inspections by the authority overseeing compliance. If you don't want it going to your insurance company, don't agree to it, and it becomes illegal for the information in your black box to end up at your insurance company.

      The EU also provides (in the new regulations) the right to transfer your data from one device to another, and to receive a full copy at any time (for free). That means you can get a copy of the data and check its accuracy by yourself should you want.

      You are also free to opt out of the data collection entirely at any time you wish.

      Lots of shit gets talked about the EU, but their data protection laws are pretty fucking awesome for end users. For companies using the data, not so much (I work at one such company), but for a private citizen, they are wonderful.

    5. Re:Who controls the data and access? by houghi · · Score: 1

      What will happen in the EU will be (I hope)
      1) Require all new cars by default
      2) No discrimination if you have an older car and not have this. So no higher insurance because of this
      3) A minimum reasonable time that the device should record (e.g. 15 minutes)
      4) Only insurance companies are allowed to see them in case of need e.g. only if there was an accident AND if there is any doubt, unless there is a court order. (Law on privacy is already intact)
      5) Non-payment of the insurance companies in if the device has been tampered with.
      6) Readable with a standard

      If you see we have a readable open source ID card in Belgium already and on who and how to use this data, this is not that out of touch.

      But you can buy guns, so you are actually a really free country (that last part was sarcasm)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  7. This was not well thought out by danomac · · Score: 1

    drivers will not have to pay attention to traffic or concentrate on steering,

    and

    but must remain seated at the wheel so they can intervene in the event of an emergency

    How are you supposed to respond to an "emergency event" if you're not paying attention? This makes no sense.

    1. Re:This was not well thought out by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Well do to apples eula we are not at fault even when the car does not have an steering wheel. At least you beat the chair

    2. Re:This was not well thought out by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This is the fundamental failing of these autonomous modes. Once the car screws up and throws its hands up in despair, since the driver isn't paying attention, they lack any of the information necessary to recover from the incident. They have no awareness of the location of vehicles and objects around them, and no time in which to gather that knowledge. Their response will be ill-informed and likely to continue the crash -- and yet the manufacturer absolves itself of responsibility because "We weren't in control, guv. The driver was, and it's them that crashed."

    3. Re:This was not well thought out by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      it does not work that way in airplanes. That is why auto drive cars taking over any time soon is not likely may with trump we can speed up the law making parts.

      But right now in planes when the autopilot fails you have a bit of time to work the issue vs in a car. And the training is lot higher with the gov's having full rights to look into stuff in a crash.

      We do have an issue with mostly Asian pilots in where they don't have as much exp / training with manual flight so they are more likely to mess-up when the autopilot fails.

      Look at Asiana Flight 214

  8. Don't autonomous cars have this aready? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    I'm not aware of any autonomous car that doesn't do this already.

    1. Re:Don't autonomous cars have this aready? by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      But there is no autonomous car that is required by law to actually record the info and not faked info that's the best for the manufacturer.

      Now, if there is a law, its much easier to fine the manufactuer really big if they try to manipulate the records.

      IMO, the black box should be supplied by another manufacturer independent from the car manufacturer, so that manipulation is totally avoided. But probably that won't happen until the industry "learns" and manipulation cases are appearing.

    2. Re:Don't autonomous cars have this aready? by WoOS · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Because there are no autonomous cars yet. So all of those none do this already.
      No, Tesla is not an autonomous car and Google car is not in series production (nor probably ever will, Google will probably want to sell the technoogy, much less captial costs).

  9. Ideas from DE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The black box for self-driving cars is the best idea I've heard all year.

  10. Re:So space x is now 'plane lands on runway' by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    What does your comment have to do with black boxes on autonomous cars?

  11. Re:So space x is now 'plane lands on runway' by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that the story whose absence he's decrying was posted seven minutes before his comment.

  12. Re: So space x is now 'plane lands on runway' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely nothing. /. editors chose to promote this click bait black box story, vs covering SpaceX. I picked the currently top story to whinge.

    I am pleased to see now /. coverage of SpaceX.

  13. Tesla already has it by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    They already have it. Everything is logged. That is how they knew of the 2 AP accidents

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  14. You don't get to opt-in. Nor opt-out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Europe, there already is such a device set for mandatory inclusion under the "eCall" programme. It isn't just a black box, it also phones the authorities if it detects what it terms a "crash". Of course, you having access to such data would just be useful, so there's no provisions made for that.

    As always: You're much better off installing recording devices yourself.

    1. Re:You don't get to opt-in. Nor opt-out. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Under EU regulations, we have rights to our personal data. The eCall system admittedly stores data which could possibly be used to identify a person, and therefore access to the data must be provided to the user. EU data protection laws are incredibly strong, especially with the next revision. If the eCall provider won't give you your data, you can lodge a complaint (which has teeth).

  15. Won't that get annoying real quick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean I like '90s house music too, but to allow only one band to play on the radio?

  16. Now that's actually one of those typical ... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    ... German regulations that actually makes sense. This isn't too far of from what these cars have already, it's probably no sweat at all for the manufacturers to add a blackbox on top of the tracking and analysis alread built in.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  17. I like this idea by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    The Tesla crash stories of the last few weeks, even about a product that is explicitly not marketed as anything more than a driver backup system, illustrate that car automation even in its current beta state is so much better than manual driving that car crashes can now be handled like air crashes, so rare that each one can be meticulously analyzed to pick apart how the system failed. A black box recording system will be a big help in this process.

    1. Re:I like this idea by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      car crashes can now be handled like air crashes, so rare that each one can be meticulously analyzed to pick apart how the system failed.

      The fact that only a tiny, tiny fraction of all the cars on the road has this function, and the fact that it is something very new, is definitely helping.

      Now if all cars would have just this autopilot crashes would occur much more frequently - even if still far less than the current rate. Then they're probably becoming so common again, like crashes with regular cars nowadays, that you won't hear about it except in the form of end-of-year statistics, or the occasional really bad one.

  18. What autonomous cars? by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

    The Tesla cars aren't autonomous. They're a regular car with lane-keep-assist and radar cruise control.

    They can't read street signs or traffic lights, manage intersections, give way, react appropriately to anything that suddenly blocks it's path (like a truck cross the road)

    All they do is keep you in the lane at a safe following distance from the car in front of you and change lanes when you use the indicator.

    If your lane suddenly ends because there are road-works, you crash through the road cones and into the safety barrier they put up.

    There have been zero autonomous vehicle fatalities.

  19. Please people it is a proposal by prefec2 · · Score: 1

    The legislation is a proposal from Mr. Dobrindt who is famous for his unsuccessfulness and stupidity. He wanted to introduce road tolls for non Germans, which is of course illegal . Therefore the project ended in disaster. He proposed WiFi in long distance trains, but the real problem is limited track capacity. He is the worst minister for transportation we had and we had quite a few stupid ones. Nowadays he is also responsible for the Internet and telecommunications. That is why we suck there too.

  20. Are you shitting me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a little known fact that new cars are already sold with an undisclosed GPS. This tracking device will be used "in case of emergency" to track you down. None of this is explained at the time of purchase except, I imagine, in some fine print of the purchase contract.