Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Patents Way To Turn Lampposts, Church Steeples Into Drone Perches (consumerist.com)

An anonymous reader writes from a report via The Consumerist: Amazon has received a patent that shows what drones may be doing when they're not flying throughout the sky delivering packages: sitting on lampposts and church steeples. "Amazon was recently awarded a patent for docking and recharging stations that would be built on tall, existing structures like lampposts, cell towers, or church steeples," reports The Consumerist. "Once the drone is done making a delivery, it would be able to land on the station, recharge and refuel, as well as pick up additional packages." A "central control system" would then be able to control each docking station and connect the docked drone(s) with a local or regional packaged handling center or central facility. Based on weather or package data, the drones may be commanded accordingly. The patent says the system will not only provide directions based to the drone, but will have the ability to redirect the unmanned aerial vehicle based on the most favorable conditions, such as a route with less wind. The patent describes a system in which the drone delivers a package to the platform that then moves the item via a "vacuum tube, dumbwaiter, elevator, or conveyor to the ground level." From there, the package could be transferred to an Amazon Locker or a local delivery person. The docking stations could also act as cell towers that "provide local free or fee-based Wi-Fi services. This can enable cities to provide free Wi-Fi in public parks, buildings, and other public areas without bearing the burden of installing some, or all, of the necessary infrastructure."

87 comments

  1. first lamppost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can find novel ways to annoy my neighbors, too. Do I really need a patent these days to do so?

  2. just like the vultures by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    they are

  3. It would also be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unbelievably ass-ugly, and i doubt many cities would relax their building codes for them.

    1. Re:It would also be by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2

      Unbelievably ass-ugly, and i doubt many cities would relax their building codes for them.

      Give the cities access to the idle cameras and cities would welcome them with open arms... free surveillance infrastructure!

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    2. Re:It would also be by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Give the cities access to the idle cameras and cities would welcome them with open arms... free surveillance infrastructure!

      These days a lot of cities have enough problems keeping the roads patched and streetlights in proper repair. Don't know about where you live, but here in Southern Ontario that's pretty much the norm.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:It would also be by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Besides, who exactly lives anywhere near a "church steeple"? Maybe they're more prominent in other areas of the country? I've seen plenty of churches, but they rarely have steeples near where I live. Also, here in the US, we have "streetlights", not "lampposts". Curious choice of wording for potential perches.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    4. Re: It would also be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may be considering the European market of a mere 500 million where church steeples and lampposts are common, perhaps?

    5. Re:It would also be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not me! Now, if it was "cathedral steeple" then we'd be talking - if my flat faced the other way, I'd be able to throw a stone through the stained glass window whenever the damned bells ring for hours (all day Sunday and Wednesday evenings, plus during the occasional royal or official visit). Anyway, stop thinking so colonially (and parochially, at that!). Other places call stuff different, and other places have stuff different - savvy?

    6. Re:It would also be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most of Europe it would be more surprising to be in almost any location that didn't have at least one steeple or spire on the horizon. In the area in which I live you're never more than half a mile from one.

      How many churches would go for this I don't know, but there are quite a few with cellular phone masts tucked away on them in the UK; churches are typically not 'listed' buildings so the church can do things that owners other buildings of the same age would not be able to do without coming up against conservation rules. And many of their parishes are liberal enough to take the money, with restrictions; they would surely wish that the drone not be able to land on a spire during a service.

  4. In other news... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    The Goodfeathers are suing for prior art.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  5. Church steeples eh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    God has no need for spies.

    1. Re:Church steeples eh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God has no need for spies.

      God has no need for spies. / God has no need for spies. - \ God has no need for spies. - God has no need for spies. /

  6. Obvious thing is obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How can they grant a monopoly to a single entity over such an obvious and necessary infrastructure item? What are all the other companies supposed to do, pay fees to amazon? Pay orders of magnitude more money to build on cell tower land or something? How can the government justify this action?
    This is a complete failure of the patent system, except for one thing, the entire patent system is a complete failure from the start.

    1. Re:Obvious thing is obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm working on a patent that will allow me to dock a drone on top of a drone on top of a lamp post or church steeple. So, there's that.

    2. Re:Obvious thing is obvious? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I wasn't even aware this was a patent-able idea, I was talking about it here on slashdot 2 years ago... would that count as prior art?

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:Obvious thing is obvious? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      The idea is obvious and, even if it weren't, if the patent system is doing it's job at all it's not patentable - ideas are specifically ineligible for patents.

      A specific mechanism though - docking connector, communication architecture, or whatever, IS patentable. And somebody else could design a different "dock" to make a complete end-run around Amazon.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    4. Re: Obvious thing is obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. I know that the US patent office is brain-dead. But I really hope it's not THAT broken.

    5. Re:Obvious thing is obvious? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      I've looked at the patent, Amazon have been smart and gone for every possible variation, solar panels, fossil-fuel refueling, cctv systems. So know if anyone does anything fancy with a lamppost they will have to pay Amazon for the pleasure. I personally think solar panels on lampposts is a pretty obvious idea to the point that I checked to see if they had patented it, they have.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    6. Re: Obvious thing is obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actual claim language, that is to say the legally enforceable part, is not just a claim to drones and docks. It's a claim to flight path rerouting based on weather data. It's not as broad as you might think.

    7. Re:Obvious thing is obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe not that obvious to lots of people. I imagine plenty of people would question the usefulness of a solar panel powering something that only really works at night - of course these people probably won't have thought about batteries or the ability to feed the electricity grid from things other than big, obvious power generating infrastructure and so offset the night-time usage.

  7. US Patent Office by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 4, Funny

    So apparently the US Patent Office will now grant a patent for a transcript of a late night undergrad bull session where at least 2 of the participants are high...

    That seems the most likely source of this patent, to me. I think the USPTO has inverted the obviousness clause: the very most obvious of business method patents require and obviously deserve to be granted, or how can US businesses continue to get richer?

    "Our drones are really short range. How do we use them to deliver stuff everywhere?"

    "Drone docks everywhere!"

    "Ok. So we put drone docks everywhere. How do we keep people from stealing or vandalizing them?"

    "They fly, right?

    "Yes."

    "So like.... like.... uhmmmm.... what was I saying.... this is really good weed..... flying... oh yeah, put 'em high up!"

    "Like on top of lamp posts and church steeples?"

    "Yeah!"

    "And make 'em deliver roaches!"

    "Yeah!"

    Thankfully, Amazon figured out that drones can have wings, and eliminated the problem entirely. So they got a patent granted for some stoner's idea. They'll never use it.

    1. Re:US Patent Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So apparently the US Patent Office will now grant a patent for a transcript of a late night undergrad bull session where at least 2 of the participants are high...

      The US patent office will issue a patent for anything nowadays. Literally anything, the only requirement is a willingness to pay the registration fees. I have seen Apple, Microsoft, and others patent stuff that has sufficient prior art available that make them, by definition, unpatentable. But patent examiners ARE REQUIRED to "help" the company get around that by telling them how to obfuscate the description sufficiently to get around any search for prior art.

    2. Re:US Patent Office by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Sky roaches might be the best description of delivery drones. Is anyone what so ever waking up to the idea of the number of drones required to achieve this. We are talking millions of drones, in any city tens of thousands of drones flying at the same time. If you have native birds don't expect them to last. For people who live in any kind of proximity to dispatch locations, well, I hope you enjoy the noise and wearing hardhats and armoured safety googles and possibly a armoured collar (statistics means that's where most will go down and taking into account numbers, quite a few). Nearby by roads, means windscreen replacement companies should have locations near drone dispatch locations. So 1 say in 10,000 chance of failure no problem, that 10,000 will tick off before noon, lunch time and take away deliveries. Yeah, nah, just wont happen because take away deliveries and good luck with that if you are stupid enough to allow it to happen, seriously stupid.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:US Patent Office by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      The obviousness clause has been moot since around patent #4,000,000.

      Autonomously recharging quadcopters was the first obvious improvement to make to quadcopters, ever. 10 minute flight times, who wouldn't think about recharging that without human intervention? Now, when you're flying through a city and you've got about 350B in market cap backing you, of course you're going to lease whatever space you think looks attractive - you've got the clout to get past any and all zoning boards, city councils, federal agencies, etc.

    4. Re: US Patent Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are totally incorrect. Examiners do not help write any description, they only examine drafted applications. I think you mean they help write claim language. Sometimes they do, but in general they want to have narrower claims and provide no such help at all. They are not required to help in such ways. Their job is to allow claims that are novel and nonobvious, that's it.

    5. Re:US Patent Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some other patents to go along with it
      1) Local Govt taxing recharging stations because in Australia they even tax using telegraph and electricity posts to carry comms
      2) Vests for the drones to wear to prevent being shot down
      3) Fitted with leave behind bugging devices for the local Mosque
      4) Pigeons and Pelicans had this idea first
      5) A scare drone to discourage birds using the recharging stations
      6) A cleaning drone to sanitize 'spills'

    6. Re:US Patent Office by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Bingo. For example two years ago I drove for UPS during the Christmas rush. At the peak the Delivery center (one of three servicing the Salt Lake City Metro center) was pushing 80,000 packages a day. Two of those three centers were at the same location a third at another, that's about 240,000 a day at peak using roughly 300 package cars. A large volume of the volume was Amazon. Call it 100k, 300 trucks versus 100,000 drone flights a day leaving from the central sort and distro facility. And those package cars go out in all weather. What happens when a thundercell rolls through an area, will those perches hold a drone in place through 70 mph wind gusts, or how do they keep their delivery schedule going during a three day blizzard?

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    7. Re:US Patent Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really obvious, and actually worthy of a patent for designing an effective recharging system. Does it have a homing beacon, does it charge wirelessly or via hard contact?

      You don't understand the obvious clause and how it is applied.

  8. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    A use for churches that isn't completely evil.

    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those senior citizens aren't just playing Bingo, they're a cabal of complete evil, then.

      Who knew?


      *Also, citation for completely evil as defined within a Darwinian framework required

  9. How about monkey bars at playgrounds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could have lots and lots of drones gather there on that jungle gym, slowly . . . slowly . . . while we're not looking . ..

  10. Gargoyls! by J053 · · Score: 1

    I can only support this idea if the drones are redesigned to look like gargoyles - now, that would be cool!

    1. Re:Gargoyls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can only support this idea if the drones are redesigned to look like gargoyles - now, that would be cool!

      Ah, The Watchmen!

    2. Re:Gargoyls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better idea.
      They swoop down, and deposit stray cats in awkward places at night, or drop them in rich peoples backyard swimming pools.
      Or will when some hacker has the right protocols.

  11. Re:We will not be having this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's "we"? You're certainly not going to do anything.

  12. Church Steeples? by sls1j · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They want their drones struck by lightening?

    1. Re:Church Steeples? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Lightning."

    2. Re:Church Steeples? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, lightening the drones would do wonders for the battery life!

    3. Re:Church Steeples? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they want their drones struck by the wrath of Taranis, Thor, Zeus, God, Ukko, Taara, Perun, Indra, Lei Gong and Ajisukitakahikone. Once Amazon expands the drone system to China, a whole thunderous army of various thunder god figures waits them.

    4. Re:Church Steeples? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Interestingly all my local churches already have mobile phone towers on them. I wonder how well drones will work when flying that close to a radiation source.

    5. Re:Church Steeples? by dwillden · · Score: 2

      Sure, and that is how they achieve pre-order delivery. Set the product to ship during the next lightning storm, land drone on steeple, lightning strikes charging capacitors with 1.21 gigawatts, drone then achieves 88 mph speed and presto deliver the package an hour before it is ordered.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    6. Re:Church Steeples? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's probably not a church steeple in the UK that doesn't already have a lightning rod. Because, you know, there's usually a metal cross on the top even if there's no spire.

      If the perch is lower than the spire, there's no issue really. And as other commenters have noted, British churches quite often have concealed mobile phone masts; it's one of the ways churches cover their maintenance funds ("Church roof fund" being almost a euphemism for begging for money in this country)

  13. cointel by pla · · Score: 1

    ...Time to patent a way to make a steeple/pole/tower (that I own, on private property) "look" like a drone recharging station, that actually fries those fuckers.

    Make no mistake, I have nothing against drones, as a concept; but fuck me if I'll give Amazon a free charge to help them expand Prime.

  14. Let me be the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hereby patent a tiny power meter to attach to the recharging station in order to charge drone owners using it a recharging fee to pay for the electricity they use. Minimum fee $10 plus cost of actual electricity used, of course. This is patent-able because although it is a standard power meter it uses the internet for billing and thus has never been thought of before (smart meters don't use the internet).

  15. What if by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

    A bird shits on it ? ( docking station)

    1. Re: What if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luddite! The newest generation drones will shit on them better than any obsolete flying animal! They will shit on everything, all the time! All hail our new everdefecating airborne robotic overlords!

  16. Ricochet! by TheSync · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Finally, a use for the abandoned Metricom Ricochet equipment on the top of street lights!

  17. Passerine drones could be solar by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Instead of tying perching drones to fixed recharging stations, why couldn't idle drones just roost on a roof or other sunny spot, spread solar wings, and recharge while waiting for the next assignment? During bad weather, they could hide under eaves or other protected places.

    The lightning problem means that church steeples are not particularly safe places for drones to wait out weather in any case.

    1. Re:Passerine drones could be solar by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Solar recharging.... with solar panels you carry with you while flying.... I think one guy has managed to barely circumnavigate the globe in a vehicle that did this, with tremendous planning and ground logistical support and repairs en-route on a vehicle purpose built from the ground up. In other words: an AC power outlet is something you don't have to carry with you (zero weight), and it delivers power as fast as you can possibly use it - even the DC conversion and battery protection circuits can live in the perch.

    2. Re:Passerine drones could be solar by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Because solar power has *horrible* energy density. Lets say you've got relatively large 1m^2 "wings" operating at a fairly high 20% efficiency. That'll get you about 200watts, at noon on the equator. Probably under 100W in most places. That's not enough power to travel far, especially not when hauling around a square meter of solar panels.

      You can do solar drones, but they're typically ultralight fixed-wing gliders designed to consume as little power as possible to maintain altitude. Nimble but power-hungry N-copters aren't nearly as well suited.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    3. Re:Passerine drones could be solar by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "Because solar power has *horrible* energy density."

      That's why you can't fly with solar panels, but how about for topping up the charge between jobs?

    4. Re:Passerine drones could be solar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact you can: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_Impulse

      Its nothing that will reach any airplane in our lifetime (and maybe never, at least not until in some few million years when the sun is far more luminous than now, and all the oceans have been boiled away but thats only a side detail), but you can fly only with solar power.

    5. Re:Passerine drones could be solar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because those small motors and batteries can actually suck up some kilowatts.

    6. Re:Passerine drones could be solar by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Doesn't really solve the problem - A high end model airplane battery might hold 150Wh, and you might get 15-30 minutes of flight out of it. So, an hour and a half of charging for 15 minutes of flight. Except it's almost certainly much worse than that because 'copters are far less efficient than airplanes, plus you're hauling around those solar panels in addition to the packages you're delivering. Bottom line, and such solar power drone is going to spend almost all of its time perched, and only a few percent in flight.

      Contrast to the case of having "charging perches" which can easily deliver multiple kW of power, charging the battery in less than a tenth of the time. That potentially allows you to spend at least as much time in the air as you do charging, plus frees your drone from carrying around solar panels that its not using in flight anyway, extending its range and/or carrying capacity.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    7. Re:Passerine drones could be solar by jdschulteis · · Score: 1

      Instead of tying perching drones to fixed recharging stations, why couldn't idle drones just roost on a roof or other sunny spot, spread solar wings, and recharge while waiting for the next assignment? During bad weather, they could hide under eaves or other protected places.

      Solar panels would reduce the usable payload.

      Expensive drones need to be earning a return on the investment by delivering packages, not sitting around waiting to recharge.

      Cheap mains electricity is available 24/7 in the vast majority of areas where package delivery drones would operate.

  18. Who's gonna pay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... for the electricity?

    Docking stations, that means power. Obviously there's already power in a lamppost, but that's paid for (generally) by the city. So are Amazon planning to run a separate power line up the same post for their docking station?

    1. Re:Who's gonna pay... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Amazon plans to lease the lamp post space, cost of electricity factored into the lease.

  19. Can power from powerlines. No infrastructure req by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your drone has 'talons' that are CTs they hang from the powerlines and scavenge power from the magnetic field as long as there is current flowing.

  20. God has no need for spies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God has no need for spies. / God has no need for spies. - \ God has no need for spies. - God has no need for spies. /

  21. Are we talking drones or bats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, if had a choice, I'd go with bats. Because at least with Goths, they are upfront about being on the dark side.
    All those sci-fi dweebs actually believe they stand for light and goodness. Or at least the confabulation science/tech which pretty much also mean light and goodness to too many (Read the recent post about a scientific based society). F' em.

  22. Nimby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously amazon would have to pay for the rights to land on each church, lamppost, etc. Seems like it would be prohibitively expensive.

  23. wifi ap's on high up objects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I especially like the addition of WIFI access point on the lamppost.

    the sub-patent would make this a patent of having wifi ap's in lampposts, roofs and such. it would apply regardless of if they have an active drone station in the place, just that you could have a drone station there too.

    this is why the patent office is a joke, by providing this they are providing a completely unenforceable patent on "wifi ap's on poles".

  24. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon, free? My browser must be malfunctioning.

  25. Drones perched on lamp posts? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    I'm worried - that could really change the balance of power in Narnia.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Drones perched on lamp posts? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Oh, what goes on in Lantern Waste is of no consequence.. it is near War Drobe and Spare Oom.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  26. I'd rent em space by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    I'd rent them space for a drone recharging station/rest stop especially if it got me preferred delivery or a discount on delivery. I'm already a prime member and get more than my monies worth in Prime video and discounted shipping, not to mention the kindle library and streaming music. I hate coming of like a shill but I like amazon and my family and I shop a lot online. I buy paperback books by the boatload from amazon for ridiculously low prices and then share them with friends or donate them to the local school.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:I'd rent em space by jdschulteis · · Score: 1

      I'd rent them space for a drone recharging station/rest stop especially if it got me preferred delivery or a discount on delivery.

      This was one of my first thoughts when I heard they were exploring drone-based delivery. A drone perch would make delivered packages less visible and less accessible to anyone who might wish to intercept them, compared to just dropping them on the porch.

    2. Re:I'd rent em space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im with you on this im a prime member and its great. I don't know why there is so much venom against amazon here.

      Hell if they could get me preferred delivery I would build the damn perch for them.

  27. Uh ... _not_ church steeples by fygment · · Score: 1

    Clearly an idea by someone who has no clue about religious sensitivities, congregations, and the like.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
    1. Re:Uh ... _not_ church steeples by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Clearly an idea by someone who has no clue about religious sensitivities, congregations, and the like.

      Would those be the delicate religious sensitivities that already have huge numbers of congregations helping to fund their tax-free social club by renting out space for cell phone antenna clusters? Those religious sensitivities? Please.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  28. Ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ignorance in this thread is astounding. Amazon does not have a patent on drones and docking stations. Read claim 1. They are claiming flight path reroutes based on weather data. They just happen to use base stations for reroute reference points. These claims are just not as broad as what you might think.

    I am a patent attorney FYI. Feel free to ask me anything you want and I'll try to respond.

  29. perches, churches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, insist that things perching on Churches be made to resemble Gargoyles. Traditional.
    As for lampposts, well..... Hee hee.

  30. Robots and drones don't buy stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We keep eliminating human jobs with robots and drones. Yet neither robots or drones buy anything. Maybe Amazon is saving money using drones and warehouse robots. But your also removing jobs that contribute to the economy, taxes, and retail.

  31. Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't wait until an endangered species decides to start nesting on these. Apparently Amazon doesn't worry about things like bird crap, ice, UV exposure, and so on. These "docks" will never last.

    1. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just having drones fall in the middle of the street.
      Why not have kindergarteners draw sketches for new patents?

    2. Re:Hilarious by jdschulteis · · Score: 1

      Can't wait until an endangered species decides to start nesting on these. Apparently Amazon doesn't worry about things like bird crap, ice, UV exposure, and so on. These "docks" will never last.

      Maintenance drones will handle any such issues.

  32. Drone Infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, let Amazon build the first drone infrastructure, then let the government take it over to spy on their citizens. Perfect.

  33. The title of this article is incorrect by kenthompson1 · · Score: 1

    I know this is an aggregation site and that slashdot does not have control. However, the title is incorrect. Amazon has not 'patented' "Way[s] To Turn Lampposts, Church Steeples Into Drone Perches".. at least based on the linked granted patent. Read the numbered claims, which are found at the end of the document. In particular, check out independent claims 1, 9 and 18 which are the legally enforceable part of the granted patent. These claims recite a method that includes using docking stations for purposes of flight path rerouting. In fact, the claims are from the standpoint of some controller and not from the drones themselves. Simply stated, the claims are the legally enforceable part and represent what the inventor/applicant believes to be their invention. People seem up in arms over what this patent actually protects without understanding what the 'scope' of the patent actually is. Note they could certainly file additional claims in another application that cover additional aspects of their specification (e.g., the technical write-up that includes reference numbers and figures), which is known generally as a continuation application. However, those claims would be examined by the USPTO and rejected if there is prior art out there that renders them not-novel or obvious.

  34. Helipad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they invented the Helipad?

  35. Birds by rolias · · Score: 1

    Birds have prior art.

  36. Tax status by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    So a church is going to give away its tax free status to rent roof space for profits? Not going to happen. Plus, church steeples are a work of art no way they are going to allow a charging system to muck it up.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  37. Just another way to spy on people by kheldan · · Score: 2

    Of course they'll be outfitted with cameras and microphones and people would get used to having them around, how convenient for the NSA/CIA/FBI, and the soon-to-be formed Thought Police.

    Fuck off, Amazon.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  38. Do X "on a lamppost" patents should be invalid. by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    Great, now we're going to have wars over "on a lamppost" patents.

  39. So much for cheaper by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    That drones would be cheaper than cars for deliveries at least make sense. Not anymore. Cars have always won based on their independence -- aside from roads, they require very little infrastructure, and that infrastructure requires very little maintenance, and it's all mobile and weather-proof. But these lamppost upgrades are hugely expensive to install, maintain, co-ordinate. Elevators, perches, chargers, ground-level co-ordination, weather-specific calibration. So if it rains for three days, that's the end of everything. Can't wait for water-proofing.

  40. prior art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This patent should be voided since there is prior art: Gargoyles have been perched on churches for centuries.