Slashdot Mirror
Engineer Gets Tired Of Waiting For Telecom Companies To Wire His town -- So He Does It Himself (backchannel.com)
Gurb, 75 kilometers north of Barcelona, is a quiet farming community of 2,500. It has suddenly become a popular place, thanks to being the birthplace of Guifi.net, one of the world's "most important experiments in telecommunications." It was built by an engineer who got tired of waiting for Telefonica, the Spanish telecom giant, to provide internet access to the people of his community. At first he wanted an internet access for himself, but it soon became clear that he also wanted to help his neighbors. Guifi has grown from a single wifi node in 2004, to 30,000 working nodes today, including some fiber connections, with thousands more in the planning stages. An article on Backchannel today documents the tale of Guifi. From the article: The project is a testament to tireless efforts -- in governance, not just in adding hardware and software -- by Ramon Roca (the engineer who started it) and his colleagues. They've been unwavering in their commitment to open access, community control, network neutrality, and sustainability. In 2004, he bought some Linksys WiFI hackable routers with a mission to get himself and his neighbors connected to the Internet. This is how he did it: Roca turned on a router with a directional antenna he'd installed at the top of a tall building near the local government headquarters, the only place in town with Internet access -- a DSL line Telefonica had run to municipal governments throughout the region. The antenna was aimed, line of sight, toward Roca's home about six kilometers away. Soon, neighbors started asking for connections, and neighbors of neighbors, and so on. Beyond the cost of the router, access was free. Some nodes were turned into "supernodes" -- banks of routers in certain locations, or dedicated gear that accomplishes the same thing -- that could handle much more traffic in more robust ways. The network connected to high-capacity fiber optic lines, to handle the growing demand, and later connected to a major "peering" connection to the global Internet backbone that provides massive bandwidth. Guifi grew, and grew, and grew. But soon it became clear that connecting more and more nodes wasn't enough, so he created a not-for-profit entity, the Guifi.net Foundation. The foundation, thanks to its cause and a cheerful community, has received over a million Euros to date -- from various sources including several levels of government. But as the article notes, a million Euros is a drop in the bucket next to the lavish subsidies and favors that state-approved monopolies such as Telefonica have enjoyed for decades. The article adds: The Guifi Foundation isn't the paid provider of most Internet service to end-user (home and business) customers. That role falls to more than 20 for-profit internet service providers that operate on the overall platform. The ISPs share infrastructure costs according to how much demand they put on the overall system. They pay fees to the foundation for its services -- a key source of funding for the overall project. Then they offer various kinds of services to end users, such as installing connections -- lately they've been install fiber-optic access in some communities -- managing traffic flows, offering email, handling customer and technical support, and so on. The prices these ISPs charge are, to this American (Editor's note: the author is referring to himself) who's accustomed to broadband-cartel greed, staggeringly inexpensive: 18 to 35 Euros (currently about $26-$37) a month for gigabit fiber, and much less for slower WiFi. Community ownership and ISP competition does wonders for affordability.
Contrast this with the U.S. broadband system, where competitive dial-up phone access -- phone companies were obliged to let all ISPs use the lines as the early commercial Internet flourished in the 1990s -- gave way to a cartel of DSL and cable providers. Except in a few places where there's actual competition, we pay way more for much less.Read the story in its entirety here.
Telecoms for prison. They betray their customers by charging high prices, and their incompetence murders packets from video streaming providers. Let's dismantle them.
Make internet open again!
Lucky for him he doesn't live in the USA, though, where the major telecom companies probably would've gotten the state legislature to outlaw it.
Is it just me, or is a "summary" that spans two full pages a bit much?
Breakfast served all day!
I work for a small city Telco (Tbaytel) in Canada. We're one of the few left in Canada created when the original founders of our city ended up disliking Bell and ended up covering a large area of NorthWest Ontario. Internet here is actually pretty good at reasonable rates and completely without download or upload limits. The only real limitation is speed depending on service but otherwise it's a reasonably good service. The competition between Tbaytel and the National Telco's is fierce but it has resulted in better services and savings I believe. The city owns the telco so a fair chunk of profits goes back to our community. So yes, it isn't impossible to have a provider that's partially government / commercial that isn't a complete rip-off to consumers.
... of course, they were only dealing with 9600 baud at first, but then again, it was the 1970s:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
There were other WISPs in the US ... I know West Virginia, where it was easier to use line-of-sight radio to a mountaintop antenna than try to string cable. But there was no WiFi standard back then ... you had to use WaveLAN or other proprietary standards (so you had to buy both ends of the link from the same company).
Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
This is how it is done. Stop complaining about Internet service and build one! There is one in SoCal made by and for ham radio people that is finally getting some momentum. It will connect San Diego to Ventura and Riverside soon. This particular project doesn't connect to the Internet, but it is an example of what can be done with volunteers and without any revenue.
Redundancy.
And I thought Comcast was bad.
The same freedom and liberty that wipe out trillions of dollars of savings in the collapse of 1929? or in the S&L crisis of the 80s? or the collapse of the housing market due to "innovative" accounting techniques and financial instruments in the early 2000s? Or the too-thick-to-see-through smog of LA in the 70s? Or the liberty and freedom that let millions of pounds of coal ash pollute and clog the rivers of NC? Or let Standard Oil wage actual warfare to corner the market by bombing competitors well sites? Or allowed children as young as 7 to work as nearly slave labor in factories where they routinely lost digits and limbs to unsafe machinery? Or factories which locked workers in and resulted in thousands of deaths from fire?
Regale me with all the wonderful tales of freedom and liberty that got Morgan and Vanderbilt and Rockefeller to their positions at the pinnacle of free market - just don't leave out the killed, mutilated, and injured in their wake.
1. so there WAS internet to begin with (in the gov't building)
2. he installed a pringles can type directional wifi antenna, like my father and thousands elsewhere
3. he worked out some network for further sharing
4. pirating, etc. source known?
5. somehow fiber optics then just appered and later on some T1? How is this *not* being served by telecom, and who absorbs network usage costs?
Back in the 70s I lived on an island which had community built, public access cable TV and water supply.
The shared water supply is still operating.
Go well
It's Spain. They currently have real problems and can't be bothered with your imaginary ones.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
It's worth noting that pollution generally is a failure to properly encode (i.e. make good laws) and enforce property rights. On your property, you have a right to not have the air coming onto your property poison you.
There's nothing wrong with child labor per se, provided it doesn't harm the child or interfere with the parent's responsibility to educate and in other ways care for their children. Historically, child labor allowed children to live, who would have otherwise starved to death. Many children want jobs, to be able to buy toys of their own choosing and otherwise achieve some measure of independence.
Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate