Slashdot Mirror


Steam On Windows 10 Will Get 'Progressively Worse': Gears of War Developer (ndtv.com)

Microsoft's Universal Windows Platform, or UWP, approach isn't sitting well with many game developers. Four months after criticising UWP ecosystem for being a walled-garden, curtailing "users' freedom to install full-featured PC software, and subverting the rights of developers and publishers to maintain a direct relationship with their customers," Tim Sweeney, co-founder of Epic Games, the studio behind the Gears of War and Unreal franchises has once again lashed out at the Redmond-based company. He alleges that Microsoft plans to make Steam -- the world's largest PC gaming platform, "progressively worse and more broken." in a move to bolster people's reliance on the Windows Store. From a Gadgets 360 report: "Slowly, over the next five years, they will force-patch Windows 10 to make Steam progressively worse and more broken. They'll never completely break it, but will continue to break it until, in five years, people are so fed up that Steam is buggy that the Windows Store seem like an ideal alternative. That's exactly what they did to their previous competitors in other areas. Now they're doing it to Steam. It's only just starting to become visible. Microsoft might not be competent enough to succeed with their plan but they are certainly trying," Sweeney said. He adds the outcome of this would be forcing every app and game to be sold through the Windows Store alone. "If they can succeed in doing that then it's a small leap to forcing all apps and games to be distributed through the Windows store. Once we reach that point, the PC has become a closed platform. It won't be that one day they flip a switch that will break your Steam library -- what they're trying to do is a series of sneaky manoeuvres. They make it more and more inconvenient to use the old apps, and, simultaneously, they try to become the only source for the new ones," he claims.

25 of 412 comments (clear)

  1. EEE by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess he forgot about the old Microsoft motto: Embrace, Extend, Extinguish. It's still alive today, albeit a bit more subtle than it used to be.

    1. Re:EEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um, how could you say he "forgot," when it's exactly what he's talking about?

    2. Re:EEE by rgbatduke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not that much more subtle. I watched as Microsoft crushed a long list of companies using exactly this strategy across the 80's and early 90's. Borland was easy -- it's so easy to break a compiler with an OS upgrade. Lotus. Word Perfect. Wordstar. Various games. They certainly tried it with their browser and it took a decade long billion dollar court case to stop them. Every operating system update, everybody else's software would break, a bit, while Microsoft's clone -- often a clone of a startlingly original and brilliant idea -- did not. Add in their marketing team to convince businesses that if they didn't buy Microsoft's house product, they would break their... um... not arms, not legs, what's the word, "interface" if the competing product didn't perfectly comply with the new specs (and of course, they never did).

      Microsoft simply made it impossible to buy a PC without their operating system pre-installed in any store that sells systems WITH their operating system pre-installed with punitive pricing agreements that dropped the margins below any possibility of profit if you tried selling a naked system or a system preinstalled with some other OS. They then convinced freelance software developers that they could get rich, quick, writing for their platform (and at first, it was true!) But gradually it has become clear that if you have a brilliant software concept, write the next killer application, and do so for Windows, Microsoft will let you run wild for a few years to build up the market and use their enormous software foundry to write their clone, then they will jerk around the OS so that your product breaks but theirs doesn't until they have the lions share of the market IF you don't sell out to them when they politely knock on your door and make you an offer you can't refuse. Five years later you will wish you hadn't.

      I have to admit that I'm a tiny bit surprised that they are doing this with Steam as it could backfire. I'm guessing that part of this is punitive. They WANT game developers to be in a Microsoft cage, with huge cross-platform development barriers, and Valve is the company that has seriously broken out of that mold and made Linux gaming with native libraries and code possible for games that run on Windows as well. Since they are preparing to make users lease Windows for eternity and ensure a perpetual cash flow for every Windows computer purchased, and since software sales through "app stores" run by the company are now a major profit center for companies that have successfully built them, they hope to retake world domination while they still have control of congress and the unions and all those companies with 401 and 403 plans heavily invested in Microsoft.

      Unless and until the government actually enforces anti-trust laws across the board, we'll have to put up with this shit. The "free" market doesn't, and won't, have a chance as long as the company that makes and sells the OS, with a virtual lock on third party PC sales in spite of much lower priced and viable alternatives, also writes software for their own OS with an insuperable advantage over independent developers, no matter how large or powerful. Software store selling "certification" (still the same company) make it even worse.

      Face it. Microsoft is in the protection racket, and has been for nearly 30 years now. FUD is their stock and trade. They represent everything that is wrong with capitalism that isn't restrained by strong anti-trust controls and limits on things like sales agreements so that they do not and cannot become long term monopolies. They have so much money that they could CONTINUE to be mismanaged for another decade and STILL would be huge. And who has the guts to tackle them (again) in the US courts? They can spend a billion dollars a year in defense, stretch an antitrust case out for a decade, lose it, and still come out a total winner. They've done so in the past and will do so again in the future.

      rgb

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
    3. Re:EEE by mattventura · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They could. We already saw tons and tons of backlash over Win10 telemetry and upgrading without consent. They can put it off because people realistically have nowhere to go. Apple doesn't make a machine geared towards gaming, and Linux still has a pitiful game catalog.

    4. Re:EEE by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. It's too late for Microsoft to defeat Steam with their Windows Store. People will switch to SteamOS before giving up Steam in favor of Windows.

    5. Re:EEE by FictionPimp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly, I keep my windows desktop for 1 reason and one reason only. If you ruin my large collection of games I will have no reason to keep my windows PC around anymore. I"ll just go back to what I used before, linux.

  2. Monopolistic abuse by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yet another example of Microsoft active in an abusive, monopolistic fashion.

    If you want PC gaming to survive, make sure you only buy games that have Linux/macOS support. As the alternatives' market share increases, NVIDIA, Intel and AMD will be compelled to spend more money on their hardware support for non-Windows OSs, and game developers will be wont to make their ports better.

    1. Re:Monopolistic abuse by LichtSpektren · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only reason they have a monopoly on gaming is because other platforms need to show up and compete, if game support on Linux was up to snuff I wouldn't run Windows at home outside a VM

      That's true, but it's a chicken-or-the-egg problem. Developers and AMD/Intel/NVIDIA don't support Linux as well as Windows because few people use Linux for gaming, and there are few Linux gamers because Windows support is better for most games.

      If we want to live in a world that's not locked down by Microsoft, we need to collectively make some sacrifices and buy Linux games now, while the support's not quite as good. That's the only way it'll get better.

  3. year of the linux desktop by steak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    2021, year of the linux desktop confirmed.

  4. Gaben Ain't Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Valve is not stupid. They have received a lot of flack for StreamOS and pushing linux as the future platform, particularly since, today, it only offers negatives (specifically, library support is small compared to winblows). But, clearly, Valve has been anticipating this from Microsoft for a long time. Any decent company knows that it isn't terribly wise to be so dependent on a competitor. Microsoft is a competitor of Valve's and the platforms look increasingly similar now that internet distribution is the norm. Vulkan is starting to look very promising. Soon, the only reason I'll need to run windows is for work and to fire up the occasional retro game like GTA San Andreas. Hear, hear, Valve!

    1. Re:Gaben Ain't Dumb by ausekilis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, Valve IS stupid. Gaben used to go on and on about how open source was the future, but kept his focus on Windows...

      How exactly is his direction to port the source engine and most of their games (including ALL their popular ones) to Linux, not to mention encouraging other software developers to release linux versions, focusing on Windows?

      I'd argue without Gaben's push, we wouldn't see Witcher, Borderlands and many other titles released in Linux. Yes, there's still some publishers that focus on the larger Windows market share, but that's not Gaben's fault.

      ... when another company was ALREADY using open source with their gaming hardware.

      MacOS is based on BSD. He could have pursued Apple too.

      That company was Sony. If Gabe Newell dislikes MIcrosoft so much, why didn't he form a joint venture with Sony, which has been using open source software longer than Valve has!

      Steam Machines are a console take on PC gaming, that would put Steam in direct competition with the Playstation store. Sony already has hundreds, if not thousands, of games in their back library... many of which have PC versions as well. They get their monthly money from their subscribers to play online. Why would Sony kill that cash cow?

      He could have also teamed up with Apple, who has been using BSD for over a decade now with their OS. That may have made an Apple/Steam console actually worth a crap... though I doubt Valve would be okay with Apple taking a 30% (or whatever) cut to each sale.

      Essentially, the PS3/PS4 OS's are what SteamOS wants to be.

      The reason is that while Gabe rants against walled gardens, the truth is he just wants gamers to use his OWN walled garden.

      The truth is he wanted to Console-ize the PC gaming environment, to make it more of a one-size-fits-most for games. That's why Steam has Big Picture Mode, why steam machines exist, and why Steam Link was created. Yes the start wasn't as awesome as it could have been, but they are certainly making strides in the home theater gaming pc market. The Steam controller already makes life easier for many keyboard + mouse games.

  5. Re:My Fingers Have An Alternative... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Steam should be sponsoring WINE project, and start getting it stabilized for STEAM. I've long proposed that WINE could be the final nail in the coffin of Microsoft, if it becomes the full replacement to Windows. Imagine all the Specialized Windows Software, that is dependent and only available on Windows, being tweaked enough to run in WINE. It is a way to wrest some of the control of Windows APIs from Microsoft.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  6. no references by sirber · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it's that guy opinion, not based on anything. windows store has a fraction of the market, with steam, origin, uplay, etc around. the best way of running windows 10 is to use the LTSB version which doesn't have all that UWP crap.

    --
    Be or ben't
  7. Steam should stop modifying perms by jader3rd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the things which turned me off to Steam was how they overwrote secure directory perms, to make it so that all users could modify folder, which only Administrators should be able to modify. Sorry Steam, you're insecure.

  8. Evidence, or it didn't happen? by Twanfox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd like to know what evidence there is to support this, rather than words on a page ranting about perception. Not that I don't agree caution, it's one thing to make big noise and proclaim persecution when none exists. Show the evidence and remove doubt about Microsoft's intention.

  9. Re:How exactly will they break steam? by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How will Microsoft pull this off? Steam downloads and installs applications. Is MS going to make downloading things outside of the Win Store difficult? Make installing applications difficult? I don't see either of things things flying with anyone who sells software meant to run on windows.

    Read the Halloween Documents to see how Microsoft operates. For example, a program competing with Microsoft's will have lots of nonsensical pop-up errors, so the user will be wont to switch to Microsoft's. In Windows 10, the OS will automatically uninstall Chrome or Firefox and switch the default browser to Edge instead based off of a "detected incompatibility". Things like that.

  10. Re:How exactly will they break steam? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well for starters permissions on directories and applications could be changed in the name of security so Steam will need workarounds. Steam, like any application, will need to access Windows APIs which only some are known internally so that any Windows Store app works differently (and better) than Steam apps. Back in the days of early Word, there was accusations by WordPerfect that Word had access to undocumented Windows APIs that made it both load faster and work better. It was a possibility or it could have been WordPerfect not knowing the Windows API as well as the DOS API. However, it is no secret now that MS has gone to great lengths to hinder partners if it meant harming a competitor.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  11. Only Steam? by penguinoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was under the impression that a lot of things on Windows 10 would get progressively worse, especially after the end of the free upgrade period.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  12. Epic Games what the Mega-Fuck? by pecosdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Tim Sweeney, co-founder of Epic Games, the studio behind the Gears of War and Unreal franchises has once again lashed out at the Redmond-based company. "

    I've been an Unreal fan since the original Unreal Tournament.

    WTF?

    Unreal stared out Linux friendly. I got GOTY working with Linux, I got the original Unreal working with some patches, 2003 was Linux compatible from the start as was 2004, then Microsoft made some maps for 2004. Unreal 2 wasn't Linux compatible, UT3 was GOING to be Linux compatible, I even bought my copy under the belief a patch/installer would happen, and it never did (you owe me a refund fucker). To top it off all the OLD Unreal games that came out as Linux compatible are only available for WIndows on Steam and other game distribution networks. I have a Mac OSX version of 2004 and it still works on modern OSX, but you don't even offer Mac versions on those networks, just WIndows.

    WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU HELPING THE ENEMY?

    Your company, of all the companies around, have one of the best track records of working with cross platform compatibility until UT2004, then you pull the plug and even shit all over your old games by making them Microsoft only to newcomers despite the fact you're pissed at Microsoft?

    It's like walking into a dark alley, have some guy try to mug you with his fist and saying "Right oh, that will never do, if you wanna mug someone you gotta have a weapon, here take this knife so you can rob me propper!" You're a living Monty Python skit, saying one thing and doing another.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  13. Re: My Fingers Have An Alternative... by dnaumov · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Except that running mission-critical software in an emulated and/or virtual environments happens at EVERY SINGLE FORTUNE500 company that has existed for more than a couple of decades.

  14. Re:How exactly will they break steam? by Phusion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Been running Win10 since the first public beta, never had Chrome and Firefox uninstalled. Have it running on desktop, laptop and a netbook, never had this happen.

    --
    640k ought to be enough for anyone.
  15. Horse Shit by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hate Windows 10 more than most (look at my post history), but they're not fucking up Steam or any other general program and they're not going to.

    What, specifically, is Windows 10 doing now that supports these claims? Steam (the client) is a buggy all on its own, and it has been since its inception. It's no longer worthy of the "Steaming piece of shit" nickname, but it's still pretty sloppy, ugly, and slow and if you ever have problems with the client not properly downloading/verifying game files, not properly syncing your library, crashing, or just not working, good fucking luck. Valve's "support" is 2 rounds of automatic responses from a robot and then silence.

    Further, Tim Sweeney is an ass. Why should we listening to him? And why is he moaning about this shit now? Valve stopped crying about it years ago. They were afraid that Windows 8 would result in people using the MS store so they cried and whinged to anyone who would listen about MS is locking down the PC, how the Windows store will be the only store, etc. Oh, and Steam just so happened to have a half-baked plan to stop them - SteamOS with big picture mode! And Steam-branded PCs that make PC gaming as easy as console gaming, at triple the price!! And a half-baked controller was coming soon!!!

    I don't know if Valve stopped crying about Windows because it's been years and no one left Steam to use the Windows Store, or if they are quietly giving up on the push for Steam OS after realizing how much work maintaining an OS is and how few games are going to use OpenGL or Vulkan, or if people stopped listening to their FUD after years of 8/8.1/10 with zero lockdown.

    1. Re:Horse Shit by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Valve quit crying because they got bored with SteamOS. A major problem with Valve's "flat" model of no bosses and no structure is that they only work on something if they find it interesting. Once they get bored, it languishes. Half Life 3 is a great example. There was clearly more story to tell, they left it unfinished, and there is clearly market demand for a sequel to the point it would be virtually assured to make money. So why hasn't it happened? Because they aren't interested in it right now. It's not a business or creative decision, it is that people are playing with other shit.

      Valve is now fascinated with VR and eSports so that is where most of their energy is going. They are the shiny new toys they like, until they change their mind and chase something else. So SteamOS is in the same general boat as Steam itself in that they work on it a bit and maintain it, but there isn't a lot going on because there are few people interested in it.

      Also I think they thought that SteamOS and Steam Machines would be like Steam itself: minimal effort on their part and people would just flock to them and use them in droves. Instead the market has responded with a resounding "meh". They'd need to put in a lot more effort to have a chance of making it happen and they don't want to do that.

  16. There is no, it is doomsaying by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe it'll end up being true, but so far there is zero evidence. The only thing so far they've done that would in any way limit Steam is that their universal applications (what used to be called Metro) are Windows Store only. So you can't sell those on Steam. Ok, except nobody but MS makes those because nobody gives a shit. The "universal" part doesn't matter, MS's phones and tablets are in their final dying moments so there's no need to make something that runs both on real Windows and Windows RT/Phone.

    At this point Win32/64 programs run better and have less limitations, and also have the advantage of running on all versions of Windows not just 10, so that is what people keep making. MS themselves are releasing their games using their new UWP format, of course, but nobody else seems to give a shit.

    So it is a meaningless limitation for now. Programs using an API nobody uses won't work with Steam. Who cares? Other than that, nothing has changed or been limited. Steam runs great on Windows 10.

    Will something change in the future? We'll have to wait and see. There's no evidence now though, because it hasn't happened. This is a doomsday prediction, and like most doomsday predictions it is based on what the predictor feels to be true, not actual evidence.

  17. EEE is not dead; look at systemd by Etcetera · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess he forgot about the old Microsoft motto: Embrace, Extend, Extinguish. It's still alive today, albeit a bit more subtle than it used to be.

    The industry as a whole seems to have forgotten the events of 15-20 years ago (as is common in human society).

    If it hadn't, we wouldn't have let systemd do the exact same thing with regards to compatibility with non-systemd distributions, let alone other Unices.

    "Sure, all you have to do is add a hard dependency on our library!"
    "They way you've been doing for 30 years is incorrect, here make a chance that will force mindshare onto your entire userbase."
    "Distributions CAN use something other than the defaults, but we want them to use the defaults and there's no guarantee that not using the defaults will ever continue to work."