Slashdot Mirror


Can Blocking Blue Light Help Bipolar Disorder As Well as Sleep Issues? (sciencealert.com)

A new experiment suggests sleeping with amber-tinted glasses can reduce the manic symptoms of bipolar disorder within three days. Slashdot reader schwit1 quotes a report from Science Alert: The benefits of amber-tinted glasses are that they block blue light -- a major component of sunlight and the light beamed at us from our computer and phone screens. In the mornings, it's this blue light that helps reset our body clock each day. But a growing body of evidence is linking too much blue-light exposure in the evenings to problems including insomnia, obesity, depression, and other mental illnesses.
I wonder how many Slashdot readers are already trying to improve their sleep patterns by avoiding exposure to blue light?

41 of 230 comments (clear)

  1. stay away from tech at night by known_coward_69 · · Score: 3

    at worst i'll read on my ipad or phone with the black screen on and have no problems going o sleep

    1. Re:stay away from tech at night by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Damn, I just wallpapered our bedroom with OLEDs.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:stay away from tech at night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have a pair of blue light blocking computer glasses that I use. Ever since I started using them, my sleep cycle has returned to normal.

    3. Re:stay away from tech at night by Chelloveck · · Score: 5, Funny

      Damn, I just wallpapered our bedroom with OLEDs.

      It's fine as long as the LEDs are organic, not those nasty GMO LEDs.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    4. Re:stay away from tech at night by shortscruffydave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Could well be placebo effect, but if you're getting the result you wanted then that's good

    5. Re: stay away from tech at night by pinkushun · · Score: 2

      From years of personal experience, I found by reading a (real) book for 30-60 minutes after working on tech, at night, solves the insomnia problem.

      I have always attributed this to tech over-stimulating the brain, nothing more fantastic than that.

    6. Re:stay away from tech at night by Mikkeles · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I wonder how many Slashdot readers are already trying to improve their sleep patterns by avoiding exposure to blue light?"

      I go to my local red light district!

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    7. Re: stay away from tech at night by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      From years of personal experience, I found by reading a (real) book for 30-60 minutes after working on tech, at night, solves the insomnia problem

      I find the same thing, reading something not on a device (a real book) tends to allow me to go to sleep more easily after staring at a monitor all day.

      I wonder if the scanning/refreshing of the monitor or screen (which is to fast for us to perceive directly) has some effect on sleep cycles or the brain.

      The screen refresh is apparently detected by our brain but for a variety of reasons we don't "see" it or perceive it directly. Perhaps just a bit of time away from the strobing of the screen allows our sleep cycle to come back to normal or equilibrium or whatever.

      Which leads me to wonder if the e-ink display on a Kindle works the same way- it is constantly refreshing or is it a 'static' image? From what I understand the e-ink display is not constantly being refreshed, but I may be mistaken in thinking that.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  2. "Sleeping with amber-tinted glasses..." by seven+of+five · · Score: 3, Funny

    Seriously? Don't know about you but when I sleep my eyes are shut.

    1. Re:"Sleeping with amber-tinted glasses..." by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Point ANY LED at your face while you're sleeping and I bet that you'll find it annoying...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:"Sleeping with amber-tinted glasses..." by mrzaph0d · · Score: 3, Funny

      i've heard you don't need to turn on that red light.

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
  3. Re:Set the record straight by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you're going to set the record straight, shouldn't it be that the lack of histamine is responsible for drowsiness? Antihistamines typically make you drowsy.

  4. Stop putting LEDs on everything. by LWATCDR · · Score: 2

    Really do I need a red LED on my TV even when it is off?

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Stop putting LEDs on everything. by Nunya666 · · Score: 2

      If the LED is still burning, it's not off.

      Do you actually own any electronics?

      Many (most?) modern electronics have an LED that is on when the device isn't powered up, just to tell you that the device has power. Many of them are red, some (such as my sound bar) are blue.

      I usually cover up those LEDs with a piece of black electrical tape.

    2. Re:Stop putting LEDs on everything. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The GP is right, that LED indicates that the device is in "standby" mode, not powered off. It's not using 0W of energy, it's wasting power looking for remote control signals or other activity. It also means it is vulnerable to mains spikes - I unplug valuable stuff so that if there is a storm it won't fry (yes I have surge protection too, it's not perfect).

      How much power is wasted depends on the device. Years ago I had a cable box that used the same amount of power in standby mode as when it was on, because all standby mode did was turn off the signal telling the TV to switch to the SCART input. The picture was actually still there if you switched to SCART manually. Incredible to thank how many megawatt hours Virgin Media wasted with that.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  5. Also streetlights by burtosis · · Score: 2

    Many cities that have already installed LED street lights are getting complaints and are removing them. Kind of funny that LED bulbs which are supposed to save money and waste have had the opposite effect. Early adoption of new technology always has issues, there is no reason these problems can't be fixed in street lights as well as any other application involving an engineered light source.

    1. Re:Also streetlights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The LED traffic light issue is a funny one though, the lights are efficient enough that they don't put out enough heat, and can get covered by snow.

      So now they need to put heaters in to melt the snow. :)

    2. Re:Also streetlights by dave420 · · Score: 2

      You don't seem to grasp that it is still more efficient than having short-lived bulbs that constantly waste heat (when it's not snowing). Your smiley betrays your ignorance.

  6. Those Damn Blue LEDs by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    The Blue LED a relatively new invention got really popular especially a decade ago. Having Blue LED Alarm Clocks, Blue LED indicators on electronics (as Green LED and Red LED are so old fashioned)

    I had a Blue LED Alarm clock... And I really hated it. It did effect my sleep, because if in the middle of the night I wake up there is a blue glow that tricked me into thinking it was day time. I had sense went back to the boring Red LED clock where I can see the time, without feeling like I am glaring into the Sun at the middle of the night.

    I am not sure about bipolar, but sleep issues with Blue LED do mess with me.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Those Damn Blue LEDs by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      I just keep one eye closed until I turn the light out again.

    2. Re:Those Damn Blue LEDs by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      The sky overhead is blue before/at dawn. It may not be to the east, but certainly is elsewhere.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  7. A little dubious. by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm a little dubious, on general principles. Plus my optometrist just suggested this new "blue-blocker" option for my glasses, it stops blue-laser light dead, a very impressive demonstration, but it paradoxically doesn't remove any blue from what you're looking at. Must be a very fine-tuned filter that just blocks one wavelength of blue. He talked on and on about the effects of blue light on sleep. Quite a hard-sell. And they want $140 for that option. Sounds like blue snake-oil to me.

    1. Re:A little dubious. by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A few years ago I noticed that I was getting a lot of headaches from eyestrain due to looking at computer monitors all day. I was flipping through some electronics magazine and noticed an add for special gaming glasses for FPS "sports". $200 for non-prescription tinted glasses. I thought of trying those, but not for $200 down. Fast forward 3 months and I'm due for getting new glasses and I find that my ophthalmologist's office is having a buy one pair, get a second pair free sale. Thinking back to the ad I asked him if I can have the second pair an adjusted prescription with a yellow tint akin to my Yellow #8 camera filters. The adjusted prescription gives me optimum clarity at between 1-3 feet in front of me (about the same as readers), and the yellow tint blocks out enough of the blue light that I don't get any headaches anymore. If I had to pay full price for the second pair, the tint was only going to add $20 on top of the normal prescription lens price (for me with all the additional options I usually get like anti-scratch, polycarbonate, etc is roughly about $200-300).

      tl;dr version: There's definitely something to blue blocking to reducing the effects of looking at a computer screen, but it shouldn't raise the price of your normal lenses by any significant amount.

    2. Re:A little dubious. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      If it's a high-frequency blue, it could remove ultraviolets and the top-end of visible blue light without impacting most blue light you see.

  8. Clickbait Science by PvtVoid · · Score: 3, Informative

    OB xkcd, and OB PhD Comics.

    Not long ago, we were all being told that illumination that mimics natural sunlight cures Seasonal Affective Disorder. Now we're being told it causes insomnia and bipolar disorder. If you look at the original article, the effect is tiny at best.

    1. Re:Clickbait Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Blue light exposure in the morning can help with SAD. Blue light in the evening might cause insomnia and other mental health problems. It's all about how the blue light exposure timing ties in with your circadian rhythms.

    2. Re:Clickbait Science by superdana · · Score: 2

      I use a light box in the morning under orders from a sleep specialist and I have a long history of major depression. One of the warnings on SAD lamps has *always* been that they may activate mania in people who are susceptible to it. That's not new and it's most definitely not contradictory. When it comes to using lamps for treating sleeping disorders, you've always had to get the timing just right or you throw your whole clock off. Again, not new, not contradictory of any prior findings.

  9. f.lux & sleep hygiene by PseudoThink · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm guessing most of the Slashdot crowd already knows about f.lux, which I use on my PC's to (attempt to) reduce nighttime exposure to blue light. I don't know how well it does or doesn't work for me, but it helps just as a reminder to unplug an hour or two before my intended bedtime, if possible.

    Practicing good sleep hygiene has tangibly improved my sleep and well-being over the past several years, though I noticed results within a week, once I learned and adopted good practices from my sleep doctor. Keeping the right ambient temperature (a surprisingly low 65-70 degrees for me), avoiding light exposure (completely blocked bedroom windows, taped over LED lights, removing all light sources but two red night-lights), getting a truly comfortable mattress, avoiding late meals/snacks/fluid intake, and (more challenging for couples) sleeping alone make the biggest differences for me.

  10. The 80's had it right, wearing sunglasses at night by PseudoThink · · Score: 3, Funny
  11. Re:Placebo effect? by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

    And how are we supposed to know those tests work if you use blind people?

    Think, people, think!

  12. Re:Set the record straight by Mashiki · · Score: 2

    Most antihistamines contain dimenhydrinate the same stuff that's used in gravol(anti-nausea meds) which is why it makes you drowsy. So for people who have problems sleeping, most doctors will tell you to take 1/4 to 1/2 up to a full gravol or generic 30 minutes before you go to bed. When that doesn't work, they'll usually move onto something like zolpidem/ambien or a barbiturate with an included hypnotic.

    For me, I've been on and off again with stuff like that for ~3 years but it's due to pain issues. Since the pain becomes bad enough that I can't get to sleep, and I'd rather not go to a higher dosage or another narcotic since it would directly impact my day-to-day life. I'd rather be working then on disability, but even that is becoming harder.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  13. How about by MayeulC · · Score: 2

    Starting by reducing minimum brightness on our phones? Even at the minimum brightness setting, my phone still hurts my eyes at night. And it's getting worse at every phone generation. I now have to use a "blue light filter" to dim the brightness by 80-95% more. Oh, and a red-colored one. I don't know whether blue light is worse or not, but I am sure that red is better for night vision, and I like to be able to see my surroundings at night. Maybe manufacturers do this to show more accurate colors at a lower brightness setting; but I honestly don't really care about color fidelity in these cases. If that's the case, how about making some color correction profiles that are function of brightness? And lastly, I sometimes adjust brightness manually on my desktop monitor, but it's quite a pain to fiddle with the hardware buttons. Is is just for my old and cheap monitor, or has no manufacturer yet figured out how to put a light sensor/software brightness control in these $180+ monitors?

  14. Amber tinted glasses really work. by hey! · · Score: 2

    I don't sleep with them, I just don't keep anything that emits blue light in the room I sleep in. But if I need to be sure of getting a good night's sleep I'll put a pair of amber safety glasses on a few hours before I want to go to bed. It makes a noticeable difference. Google S1933X for cheap, optically OK amber tinted safety glasses which are dramatically opaque to far blue spectrum light. As a bonus when you put them on all those annoying super-bright blue LEDs simply disappear. You have to take the glasses off to see whether a blue LED is lit.

    And if you feel like a dork wearing safety glasses around the house, just remind yourself this is brain hacking. I've contemplated trying EEG hedsets and TMS all that kind of stuff, but never have taken the plunge; but for $12 and being willing to look an ass you can actually alter the function of your brain to be more to your liking, which is kind of cool. Now I can unwind at the end of the day by watching Netflix -- after awhile your brain adjusts to the altered color temperature and in most cases you don't miss the bright blue. Instead of binge watching into the wee hours you'll get sleepy and go to bed at a reasonable time.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  15. Re:Sounds pretty crappy. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hypomania is kind-of-sort-of awesome. Not really, but it feels that way, like cocaine or a small dose of meth might.

    Full mania involves a facial rictus like the Joker, being unable to stop grinning, giggling at everything. You drive fast, you make bad decisions, you don't care. Everything is awesome, all things are awesome. The inside of your skull burns, and it's awesome; you can feel your neurons screaming, and you want to shoot yourself in the head with a shotgun to make it stop, because it's so awesome, too much awesome, it burns so much and it's awesome like a vicious nuclear fire inside your skull.

    Even a hypomanic episode can completely cancel any urge to sleep. You wake up the next day still feeling awesome, but also tired; your eyes burn, your head hurts, your body creaks and cracks around you, and you drag yourself, nauseated and battered by sleep deprivation, out of bed because you just can't stay still. It's bad but it's cool because you feel kind of great and kind of shitty at the same time. You might spend days or even several months without more than a few hours sleep each night; you start feeling high all the time, like you're smoking opium constantly, but the sedation is just extreme sleep deprivation. You can't think straight and can't get anything done, and you feel useless, but also pretty awesome, actually.

    Unless you're stable against suicide, mania is a good time to kill yourself, since it's both terrible and uninhibited: it's a shitty way to go through life, and you feel a lot more confident about going on and offing yourself. Most bipolar suicides occur during a manic episode.

  16. Re:Set the record straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You just got out-pedanted!

  17. Re:Rose-tinted glasses by omnichad · · Score: 2

    Not to get pedantic, but rose-colored glasses let a lot of blue light in too. Not pure-red.

  18. View from a sufferer by John+Allsup · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Apologies if what follows comes across as a rant. Thus is an extremely sore topic for me.

    As someone with bipolar diagnosis (and an autistic spectrum disorder diagnised over a decade after the bipolar diagnosis), I can say from my experience that two different people with the same diagnostic label can have markedly different problems. What works is heavily dependent on what exactly is happing in the patient's life and mind, and upon what intellectual, social, family and other resources they have at their disposal.

    The idea that you can treat all instances of a bipolar patient as sufficiently similar that a clinical trial of a treatment will yield useful, meaningful and reliable information as to what will help an arbitrary new patient with the same diagnosis is something for which I have yet to come across empirical support for (consider how different software can cause the same hardware to behave markedly differently, the futility of trying to fix serious software errors with simple hardware patches, and the foolishness of taking 1000 windows PCs which regularly blue screen, and conducting a double blind randomised controlled trial on treatments for PCs with 'compulsive blue screen disorder'). I am sorry to say, that to me psychiatric research is thus brain damaged in its basic methodologies.

    The idea that chemical imbalances are a cause rather than a symptom is something yet to be justified, as is the idea that bipolar disorders can be understood at a biochemical level and remedied with chemicals with any degree of reliability. Then things like whether the person has a (possibly undiagnosed) autistic spectrum disorder or not are ignored (I have recently received an ASC diagnosis), and if not ignored, old trials are not revisited in the event that new diagnostic information has come to light regarding participants of old trials which would have affectee the trial and possibly the outcome. By comparison, if a physicist discovers a component in his exoerimental apparatus has a bias, he or she will not ignore the matter if it could significantly affect the conclusions of the experiment. The psychpharmalogical juggernaut just rolls on, turning mental health into a game of drug sales, cattle management, and explaining away all alternatives: behaviour reminiscent of hard sell marketing, not proper scientific inquiry.

    As for blue light, at times when extremely sensitive, blue light can, due to extreme sensitivity, be confused with daylight, with consequences for how your brain tries to sync to daylight. In times of extreme sensitivity (which can be diagnosed as manic episodes, as can episodes of manic behaviour driven differently), it is like the gain on yout brain inputs is turned up too high, is saturated, distorting, and your brain then attempts to make sense of the distorted sensory input on the implicit assumption that it is free of distortion. That, at least, has been my experience in the past (once in hospital they used bright blue-tinted flashlights to see if we were in bed, for example, resulting in my being awoken so strongly when about to go to sleep that there was no possibility of sleep for a number of hours, and jobbing nursing staff often want their jobs to be as easy for themselves as possible, and care little if that has negative ramifications for the patients).

    In addition, check out 'Deprived of our Humanity' by Lars Martensson (what he writes accords much with my experience), madinamerica, Joanna Moncrieff's books (myth of chemical cure, straight talking intro), Richard Bentall's books, Lucy Johnstone's books (straight talking intro), details of successful outcomes (beyond what is achieved with typical pharmacologically centred approaches) using alternative approaches (see e.g. Daniel Mackler's open dialog documentary, on youtube now).

    Feynman had a wonderful couple of quotes in his Cargo Cult Science talk:

    "But this long history of learning how to not fool ourselvesâ"of having utter scientific integrityâ"is, Iâ(TM)m sorry to say, something that we

    --
    John_Chalisque
  19. Re:Set the record straight by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

    Use Fexofenadine then. Talk to your doctor BEFORE using Fexofenadine. Don't take Loratadine ever again. Tell your doctor Loratadine does that, and tell him it needs to be written into your medical history.

    Loratadine works way better than Fexofenadine, and is counter-indicated only when a patient has a Loratadine sensitivity. Drug sensitivity is dangerous as hell; look up Monty Oum to see how that can work out. I historically have *no* drug sensitivities, and any sensitivities that the doctors discover will likely kill me or simply go away after a short period (I have extreme drug resistance, although there are people with stronger tolerances; in my case, my renal system appears to be fantastic, so much so that I have trouble getting drunk because my kidneys have learned to remove ethanol before my liver can process it--and renal elimination is *damn* fast. This is why time-release drugs are now popular, such as every modern ADHD treatment and many 10mg Loratadine pills).

  20. Exercise, sleep hygiene by MrKaos · · Score: 2

    I've only ever had problems sleeping when I don't exercise, I work hard so I'm usually ready to sleep even after not exercising for up to a year. Best quality sleep I've found is when I have that sore feeling after a workout, I love that feeling and sleep is deep.

    I've got a recipe for sleep hygiene as well, it's pretty simple.

    • Blinds and curtains that cover the windows and make it really dark.
    • No electronic devices in bedroom. I accept the phone at the moment because I haven't found a decent alarm clock.
    • Shower before bedtime.
    • Air room everyday for about an hour
    • Change sheets and everything else every two weeks
    • Air all bedding once every two week - shake it out, leave it in the sun for a while if possible
    • Have fresh water beside bed to drink

    I don't know if there is any significant impact when the above is considered, however I avoid blue light. I usually on the computer up until 5 minutes before I sleep. By which stage there is very little that will keep me awake. When I train my wife tells me I am usually asleep within 30 seconds of putting my head on the pillow.

    I will relate one other experience though. I've found that knots in your back may not be painful to the point that you are aware of them however they will keep you awake by simply making you uncomfortable. I posted here months ago about the extreme physiotherapy I have put myself through and part of resolving the scar tissue from sports injury meant I went through a period of several months where the knots in my back were so painful that they would wake me up at night and I could not sleep again. Fortunately those knots were also destroyed and it no longer affects me.

    Just because you don't have current injuries doesn't mean the former ones, stress and emotional issues aren't affecting you in unexpected ways by manifesting physical issues (especially knots in the back). Losing sleep effects a degenerative feedback loop which can be broken by resolving the scar tissue from the injuries and the knotted muscles from stress and emotional issues. The physiotherapy may be confronting, however it's preferable to the frustration of nights without sleep and feeling like a zombie the next day.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  21. Re:Sounds pretty crappy. by John+Allsup · · Score: 2

    I have found, over the years, that learning various disciplines is invaluable.

    I have studied Tai Chi to the point that, to physics students, I often explain how it is just about seeking extreme mechanical efficiency (and then applying that in a martial arts context), and is basically physics in disguise: the major difference in how it is thought of and explained, traditionally, is due to two things, one of which is the cumulative effect of 'Chinese Whispers', and the other is that you do not have time to get a pen and paper out and solve a system of differential equations in order to deal with a fist flying at your face. Thus it must be understood in a way which permits you to react in real time, but in a way which is as mechanically efficient as possible.

    Similarly, meditation (Buddhist and Christian) has been massively helpful, as has a grounded spiritual faith. I know Christianity often gets a bad name on forums such as these, and often deservedly so due to the mess that many (esp. fundamentalist and overly conservative) traditions have made of it, but when it comes to stability against suicide, it is certainly my experience that a solid spiritual faith is one of the best tools around.

    More generally, if you train your awareness, and your discipline to react in smooth, calm ways to whatever is thrown at you (as Tai Chi aims to do), and you try to infuse this approach into as much of your life as you can, this greatly aids your ability to steer your mind when things are drifting towards mania. Then you need to find a way to strongly dominate your thinking, get yourself tired, and then get your brain to switch off at night long enough for the tiredness to get you to sleep, and with your mind calm enough that it doesn't start up again before you're asleep. Then you can at least get enough rest to stave off the worst, and buy yourself another day to improve your situation.

    Music, and music production is again invaluable. Learning how delay and feedback works in DSP has been a massive mind opener, as is how feedback and resonance work, and more importantly, how they sound and feel: for me much of what is going on in mania and psychosis is a kind of ringing feedback in the brain, akin to what happens on an old school analogue synth if you turn the resonance too high, albeit with the complexity increase resulting from moving from a simple one-dimensional electrical signal to the madhouse of mayhem that is a human brain.

    (I often like to say that, if you wanted to make the Inside Out movie more realistic, a good way would be to replace the simple embodiments of emotions with massive hordes of Minions, and mania is what happens when said Minions go on a massive 'banana' rush!)

    --
    John_Chalisque
  22. Re: Flux screen gamma correcting software... by pruss · · Score: 2

    A projector can work great in a bedroom. Point it upward and project on the ceiling and you can watch while lying down. Or use a white wall or even vinyl rollup curtains (though the last shares the movie with the neighbors, so it needs to be family friendly).