Slashdot Mirror


Olympic Committee Prohibits Streaming Apps, Vines and GIFs From Its Events (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The Olympics Committee has introduced a new set of social media guidelines for the 2016 games. Not only will streaming applications and vines be prohibited, but GIFs will be too. TechCrunch reports: "Part of the new restriction appears in the official broadcast rules (PDF), under 'Internet and Mobile Platforms': '[...] the use of Olympic Material transformed into graphic animated formats such as animated GIFs (i.e. GIFV), GFY, WebM, or short video formats such as Vines and others, is expressly prohibited.' Then, in the FAQ for the social and digital media guidelines (PDF): 'Broadcasting images via life-streaming applications (e.g. Periscope, Meerkat) is prohibited inside Olympic venues.' The versions of these documents updated for the 2014 games in Sochi don't have any comparable language, or at least nothing this specific. A possible exception is the 'Photographer's Undertaking,' which states: 'The dissemination of moving images or sound captured in an Olympic venue, through any media, including display on the internet, Mobile Platform and other interactive media or electronic medium, is strictly prohibited.'"

11 of 188 comments (clear)

  1. Do us a big favor by reboot246 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Prohibit television broadcasts, too.

  2. Seriously fuck the Olympics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a big corrupt waste of time and resources, it funnels huge amounts of money out of the lower and middle class into the pockets of the wealthy and at the expense of nations..

    fuck the Olympics so fucking much

    1. Re:Seriously fuck the Olympics by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually that would be a pity. There are quite a few sports that only get to be dragged into the limelight every 4 years. And these athletes are by no means any worse than those football or basketball players that you have to endure weekend after weekend. There are some rather interesting sports that are incredibly interesting to watch but simply have nobody lobbying for them.

      Yes, the whole corrupt bureaucracy around it is despicable. But why do you want to punish the athletes for it, that would just add injury to insult.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. Fascist capitalists by presidenteloco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    are running the show.

    Wasn't the Olympics supposed to be about the worldwide celebration of amateur sport?
    That is, sport done for the love of it, not for money.

    This is what anonymization services were invented for, people!

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  4. Re:Just not excited, won't be watching any Olympic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We used to record the broadcasts, first on VCR of course, and later Tivo. But since the cable companies have obsoleted both of those, plus our PC tuners, with encrypted digital transmission, we simply won't watch at all. We are in a valley that does not receive any over-the-air signals so we don't have a choice - we must pay to watch television, even broadcast. We refuse to pay even more than we already are just to do what we've done since the late 70s - record television for later viewing and/or skipping of segments/advertisements we are not interested in watching. The amount of absolute crap that is mixed in with every few minutes of actual events and competitions is just too great. If we can't skip over the shit and watch the important stuff, fuck it.

    Because of this, our television watching has significantly decreased, as has our programming package (and also our monthly bill). When the recording options went to shit, we started watching "on demand" instead, and if it wasn't on that, we just didn't watch it. But now the cable company is further trying to extort even more money out of us by reducing "on demand" offerings to "HD only", which just pisses us off even more (we do not have a fancy new set). And to add even more headache, what on demand programming that had closed captions, no longer does. Cable company doesn't care because "on demand" is not required to carry captions like the live broadcasts. We of course are told we can (pay to) subscribe to their DVR service and record programming which would then have the captions preserved during playback. Fuck.

  5. Man, talk about pricing yourself out of business by mykepredko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Someone in the IOC needs to be picked up an shooken - hard.

    I guess this means that proud parents can't tweet pictures of their medal winning children.

    Attendees can't talk about what a great experience they're having.

    Everybody else ignoring what's going on there.

  6. Excitement aborted by Wokan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they're trying to prevent people from getting excited about the Olympics or share their enthusiasm, they've succeeded. At this point I really couldn't give a crap about the Olympic games. Now I just feel sorry for the athletes who are risking disease over something the IOC seems dead set on restricting access to.

  7. Re:ioc money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Better yet, don't mess with the IOC. Just avoid the olympics entirely. Then we'll see how quickly they realize the stupidity of their decisions. Maybe.

  8. Re:ioc money by bane2571 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and just like that the Olympics became invisible to two whole generations because a third older generation want to maintain control of distribution.

  9. Take a page from the NFL's playbook by aklinux · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The NFL invests thousands of dollars upgrading connectivity in stadiums hosting the Superbowl and other major NFL events.

    They've figured out that people attending these events aren't going to take anybody's broadcast revenues by sharing on social media. It's about sharing the experience with their friends and family. A picture, or video clip, that shows...I was here!! This helps build up the hype, viewership, and attendance overall.

    1. Re:Take a page from the NFL's playbook by RubberDogBone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Olympics charge the broadcast and cable companies a fortune for coverage rights. Comcast NBC paid $1.23 billion for Rio alone.

      In return for all that money, the IOC tries to make sure viewers HAVE to use the various channels and outlets who paid. They have to defend the licenses they sold for so much money. If people can get Olympics footage or see the games without a licenced TV partner involved, the IOC won't be able to charge as much money.

      And yeah it is all about money. The IOC could care less about the sports. It's all about license fees and rights and getting paid enormous sums to watch poor atheletes living in squalor back home try to compete. They make a lot of money off these kids.

      NBC has contracted through 2032 to carry the games so they are dropping close to 20 billion dollars on this stuff. The IOC better defend that. Or else.

      My response is to not watch any of the coverage. I used to be a rabid Olympics viewer. But it all changed after 1996 when I was much too close to the games and saw first hand it really is all about the money, not the sport and not the atheletes.

      --
      Sig for hire.