Slashdot Mirror


The World's First Web Site Celebrates 25 Years Online (info.cern.ch)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNN: Twenty-five years ago, the first public website went live. It was a helpful guide to this new thing called the World Wide Web. The minimalist design featured black text with blue links on a white background. It's still online today if you'd like to click around and check out the frequently asked questions or geek out over the technical protocols.
Its original URL was info.cern.ch, where CERN is now also offering a line-mode browser simulator and more information about the birth of the web. CNN is also hosting screenshots of nine web "pioneers", including the Darwin Awards site, the original Yahoo, and the San Francisco FogCam, which claims to be the oldest webcam still in operation.

What are some of the first web sites that you remember reading? (Any greybeards remember when the Internet Movie Database was just a Usenet newsgroup where readers collaborated on a giant home-made list of movie credits?)

136 comments

  1. And no slashdot effect? by NotInHere · · Score: 1

    Well prepared, well prepared.

    1. Re:And no slashdot effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've been talking to people, really smart people, the best people and they all say CERN has a great internet connection. They tell me CERN's internet is the best, it's really great, that's why we're going to take over this CERN place. And I'm going to get Bill Gates and Vladimir Putin to figure out how to use CERN to win an election.

    2. Re:And no slashdot effect? by nukenerd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well prepared, well prepared.

      No preparation needed, it just has no baggage. It's a long time since I saw a page load so fast.

    3. Re:And no slashdot effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a long time since I saw a page load so fast.

      We have come so far, and yet fallen a long way behind.

      I'm sick of css, javascript, bloat, crappy designers and their 3MB, 5 seconds to load, +3 seconds to render, +4 social media buttons, plus "responsive" touch based picogram icon crap shitting up my web browsing experience for the last 5 years. Websites used to be fast dammit!

      The worlds first website, from 1991, is an 2.2K file that insta-renders, and is still more readable, usable, informative, and hyperlinked than most "modern" websites. if you can even call them websites anymore and not cheap rip offs of low capability mobile apps. Fuck Google. Fuck their mobilegeddon. And fuck Mozilla for shitting up Firefox, from UI all the way down to core.

      Nobody likes all this stupid bullshit. Keep. It. Simple. Stupid.

    4. Re:And no slashdot effect? by pepsikid · · Score: 2

      I hate websites where the elements keep squirming around. I click a spot and nothing happens. Then the objects shift over and the page takes a click on the thing that wasn't there when I clicked.

    5. Re:And no slashdot effect? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Remember how different this looked in 800x600, without antialiasing of text, abominable Times New Roman, heavy link underlining, and a mid-grey colour as the browser default, inherited from development on TBL's NeXT?

      Or the MacOS 7 black and white...

      You really need an old computer, to truly appreciate the experience of this old page.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    6. Re: And no slashdot effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      640x480 n00b

    7. Re: And no slashdot effect? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      What!?

      No Mac II or an Orchid ProDesigner for VESA Local Bus?!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    8. Re: And no slashdot effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My computer gets 1.06 picas to the Cicero, and that's the way I likes it!

  2. Toll please, consumer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If that page was made today, it would be spread out over 5 pages, have 32 trackers and self playing ads with sound.

    1. Re:Toll please, consumer by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      It'll also be 3-12MB for no discernible reason.

    2. Re:Toll please, consumer by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      You forgot blink] Blinky /blink'

    3. Re:Toll please, consumer by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Non-commercial web pages are still being made. It's just that the commercial web naturally has all the marketing dollars to become popular.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    4. Re:Toll please, consumer by DamonHD · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In the very very early days of my UK ISP I had to ask the US NSF for permission to send 'commercial' packets across the Internet core routers!

      Sadly I have lost their (paper) letter granting me that permission.

      Rgds

      Damon

      Oblig: http://www.exnet.com/springboa...

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    5. Re:Toll please, consumer by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      If that page was made today, it would be spread out over 5 pages, have 32 trackers and self playing ads with sound

      Or else be one of the top-trafficked and most influential sites currently online in the US.

    6. Re:Toll please, consumer by Creepy · · Score: 1

      To be fair, in 1991 there was no commercial web. Some commercial entities were allowed to connect to the internet as early as 1989, but full commercial internet didn't start until 1995.

        I remember using the WWW in 1991 or 1992 before dropping out of school for a while and thinking how inferior the technology was to gopher (everything was text like in the example page). The browser I used was something cobbled together by some students and was more like a shitty version of lynx (all text based because the entire university was terminal based UNIX and some non-UNIX VAX computing back then). I had some internet access while out of school through the library dial up (certainly not legal - some friends hacked it), so I discovered Mosiac in 1993 and really liked it - a huge improvement over my first experience. That server was newer and running an XServer, so connecting to it through Slackware I could see graphics, but it was very slow (my modem was shit - 14.4 probably). When I returned to school in 1994 they even gave me space to create a web page. Netscape changed everything not long after that (which I beta tested and may have gotten an alpha release).

    7. Re:Toll please, consumer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and despite the please for more government aid to technology it wasn't until the government got out of the way that the internet flourished. Imagine where we would be if they had done it sooner.

  3. I remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The BLINK tag.

    1. Re:I remember by mykepredko · · Score: 1

      Which was immediately followed by the direction that it should NEVER be used.

    2. Re:I remember by dejitaru · · Score: 1

      pffft.... I hated blink... now marquee... I used that wayyyyyyy too much back in the day. The 15 year old me loved it. The present me wants to slap the 15 year old me

    3. Re:I remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pffft.... I hated blink... now marquee... I used that wayyyyyyy too much back in the day. The 15 year old me loved it. The present me wants to slap the 15 year old me

      Best use of marquee, kept early IE users away from pages which didn't concern them, what with every individual letter marquee'ing in alternating directions causing their eyes to bleed and their machines to freeze (ISTR the way it was implemented was CPU intensive..)
      Fun days...

      Btw, I've a site that's been up since 1997 on the server which currently hosts it, prior to that it existed in one form or another from sometime mid-late '93 with the last updates made back in '99 and I've still not gotten back to fix some of the borked html that happened in the move..no javascipt..no css..most of the pages are now 21 years old..and yes, it looks it, and no, not a fuck is given..

      FWIW, the Cern server code was terrible, I never did get it working with any degree of stability on my then desktop machine, a Sun 3/60, or on any of the other machines I had access to at the time ( a motley collection of SPARCstation 1 and 2's and some 4/110s), whereas the NCSA httpd code compiled and worked first time and was bloody reliable, the Sun 3/60 I was using was just a wee bit limited (8MB RAM), so when the number of weekly accesses started climbing to above 20,000 (November-December '95) I eventually moved to a SPARCstation 2 with 16MB RAM, which was happily handling 50-70,000 accesses per week back in '96 as well as also being my 'desktop' machine..

    4. Re: I remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is Blinky Bill ok to use

    5. Re: I remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is [marquee scroll amount="x" scrolldelay="y"Blinky] Bill[/marquee] ok to use

  4. Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's really sad that the first website is much easier to read than those built using modern tools.

  5. Y! was always bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first website that actually worked as intended? Slashdot.org
    The first website that I actually visited frequently? Lycos (pre-google era)

    Yahoo was always rubbish. It started out as terrible, and stayed terrible till they did the free email thing, and then everyone else brought out their own free email and thus nobody ever profited from free email. This is circa 1998 now.

    At the end of the day, Google ultimately is what "changed everything" with a search engine that actually worked and wasn't cluttered with spam like every search engine otherwise.

    1. Re:Y! was always bad by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I remember Lycos. It looked like a search engine but nearly always it returned something other than what you wanted.

      Altavista and HotBot worked decently though. The main problem with Altavista was when people started doing heavy SEO and it broke the search results. Not to mention the paid results page you had to click through in order to get to the results you actually wanted. When Altavista started it had none of those issues.

  6. Dancing hamsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hamster Dance

    1. Re:Dancing hamsters by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      Hamster Dance

      And the Goatse Pancake Bunny Dance. (analse.cx; now gone, but preserved by the Wayback Machine.)

  7. First cool site was 'the liquid oxygen barbecue' by destinyland · · Score: 2

    The first really cool site that I remember was where a guy poured liquid oxygen onto his barbecue. You can still watch it at Archive.org...

    There was a massive fireball -- and a huge rush of adrenaline. I was always kind of sad that they didn't find some way to keep the original web page on the internet forever...

  8. Web Crawler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember that site. Nice and simple, with a spider motif.

    1. Re:Web Crawler by pepsikid · · Score: 2

      What is this 'web' you refer to? Is it part of SnapChat?

    2. Re: Web Crawler by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it WebSpider?

    3. Re: Web Crawler by guruevi · · Score: 1

      I remember using Dr. WebSpider on Caldera DR-DOS (now SCO) was probably my first browser. Also a pretty good TCP/IP stack for the day, wasn't vulnerable to ping of death.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:Web Crawler by dejitaru · · Score: 1

      I loved webcrawler... Back then it was amazing to be able to search through all search engines at once. Like Dogpile, metacrawler, mamma, etc. The crazy thing was watching the "spycrawler" or whatever, to see what people were searching for in real time... amazing to see all the pervs

  9. My own ISP site! by DamonHD · · Score: 2

    Well, I ran one of the first UK ISPs, and here is our fossil 'start' page for users:

    http://www.exnet.com/springboa...

    Most of the links and graphics have now died!

    But this was '95-ish and at uni some years earlier we had Mosaic and some very limited live access to the outside world, including isolated protocols such as FTP (ic.ac.uk was good) and Gopher... But Altavista in '95 really made a difference.

    Rgds

    Damon

    --
    http://m.earth.org.uk/
    1. Re: My own ISP site! by byolinux · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this!

      Who were the other early ISPs in the UK? I remember UUNET, Zynet, Demon -- something called The Free Net, too?

    2. Re: My own ISP site! by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      IBMPCUG (IBM PC User Group) was one I liked.

      I set up because I did not like the UKNet / Pipex duopoly that didn't seem to be to have even heard of customer service, and IIRC liked to claim copyright in all materials (eg USENET) that was routed via them... %-P

      I imported and supplied Demon's first DNS server, a second-hand Sun workstation. I still remember carrying into their office and setting it up on a table for them. Cliff S was there I'm fairly sure...

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
  10. What, no goat.se? by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

    I just about barfed the first time I unwittingly visited that.

    1. Re:What, no goat.se? by bheerssen · · Score: 2

      I trust that there are still plenty of mirrors available. I also trust you can find them if you are so inclined. Please forgive me if I'm too, umm... lazy to do that for you.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    2. Re:What, no goat.se? by realkiwi · · Score: 1

      Yeah... "Don't click this link!" and hundreds of windows opened or however many MacOS could handle (probably not many) before crashing and burning. I sometimes still wake screaming "Noooooo! Don't click that link!!!!"

      --
      realkiwi
  11. Summary is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The minimalist design featured black text with blue links on a white background.

    The pages uses the default background, text and link color.
    Those are white, black and blue in many browsers but by no means all.
    If you set one of them, make sure you set all of them, otherwise your text or links could end up the same as the background color and become unreadable.

    1. Re:Summary is wrong by xtsigs · · Score: 1

      The minimalist design featured black text with blue links on a white background.

      Those are white, black and blue in many browsers but by no means all.

      Many browsers?? I only remember the one. The many came later. Notice the tense: featured.

    2. Re:Summary is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember using lime green as the default background color on my work machine such that I would remember to specify background color even if it was supposed to be white as white was not the default in all browsers.

    3. Re:Summary is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original idea was that markup would be structural and semantic-only. Appearance would be completely up to the client.

      That idea went away the moment the "designers" threw a tantrum over not being able to control layout, fonts, and colors. Then we got the nightmare of incompatible HTML "extensions" by Netscape and Microsoft, who capitulated without considering what the best fix should be (styles, but please not CSS).

  12. A reminder that the web was created by Snufu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to allow citizens to share information for the greater public good. It was not created as a means for private profit or spying on its users.

    1. Re:A reminder that the web was created by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      Well there is still wikipedia, and people have the choice every day between volunteer created ad free openstreetmap and commercial google maps, created by people on their day job (and some few contributors who work for google for free).

    2. Re:A reminder that the web was created by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there is still wikipedia...

      Run by a clique, so not really a good example there...

  13. This little gaming news website... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    Blue's News back in the day. I haven't read it in years. Still around.

    https://www.bluesnews.com/

    1. Re:This little gaming news website... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spot on - all the Quake news sites that appeared around 1996 when it was released. I think Bluesnews may be the last of those.

  14. Classic Steve Jobs and the Nascent Web by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Steve Jobs and some folks from Pixar were going out to lunch one day. While walking out of the building, Steve said "we have to find the killer app for the Internet". Steve and I both had NeXT workstations on our desks, and they had the first Mosaic web browser for NeXTStep on them. I'm not sure I even tried that browser, but we both completely missed that this was the killer app for the Internet.

    1. Re:Classic Steve Jobs and the Nascent Web by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      My killer app for the internet was a college homework problem solver similar to what wolframalpha is today. Unfortunately I had the idea circa 1990 and no funds. I wish I still had my sketches for it...it looked a lot like a web browser. The idea was to distribute disks through the mail.

    2. Re:Classic Steve Jobs and the Nascent Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      a lot of us missed this boat. "it is just a fad for hard core nerds.. no one in the real world will ever care"

    3. Re:Classic Steve Jobs and the Nascent Web by paiute · · Score: 1

      In 1980 or so I was searching the chemical literature (paper) for help. One limitation was that editors would go through a paper and extract maybe 5-10 keywords that appeared on the title page. So you could scan those pages for relevant content completely miss facts that were buried in footnotes and experimental summaries. I used to bitch that we would work with our hands tied until every word was a keyword and they were searchable electronically. If I had a NeXt workstation then and Mosaic, I might have pointed that out to you.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    4. Re:Classic Steve Jobs and the Nascent Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >"App" ?
          You must be new to the digital world. (Or hellbent on revisionist history). Did he also say Sick when meaning something good?

    5. Re:Classic Steve Jobs and the Nascent Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "App" has been short for "application" since at least the late '80s.

      And you're seriously accusing Bruce Perens of being new to the digital world??

    6. Re:Classic Steve Jobs and the Nascent Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My best quote from that period, when a senior academic then (but a somewhat more senior academic now) was told that we'd set up a web server for his department/group mid-late '92 at the behest of a couple of his postdocs, his response was a rather disparaging 'what earthly use is this web thing ever going to be?'

      (Fun fact: One of the postdocs left about 9 months later, set up an ISP back in his home country, made millions, and thus managed to fund his own research work..)

    7. Re:Classic Steve Jobs and the Nascent Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're seriously accusing Bruce Perens of being new to the digital world??

      That isn't really Bruce Perens. Bruce Perens had a Slashdot sig that said "The real Bruce Perens has Slashdot ID 3872, anyone else is an impostor". This guy doesn't have that sig, so it isn't him.

    8. Re:Classic Steve Jobs and the Nascent Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not your fault you were born so recently and missed out on the 70s 80s and 90s, so have no clue about the entire history of computing - but the least you millennial history revisionists could so is keep your fucking mouth shut when you lack all knowledge about the subject your lips are flapping on about.

      "killer app" is a term from the late 70s, many decades before your birth.

      Go look up the original Microsoft VS DOJ court transcripts when Microsoft was first sued for antittrusat laws.
      You'll see the term "killer app" is publically documented as a term back in the early 80s (also many decades before you were born)

      Oh and as another heads up since you doubtfully know, yes there actually existed a programming language before Java, and CPUs didn't come into this world running at speeds measured in Mhz and with memory measured in kilobytes.

    9. Re:Classic Steve Jobs and the Nascent Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      next time save your arthritic fingers some typing and just write "get off my LAWN"

    10. Re:Classic Steve Jobs and the Nascent Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, so an imposter with ID 3872 posted, but without a sig saying "the real Bruce Perens has Slashdot ID 3872" so it can't be him?

      Give me some of what you're smoking.

  15. Re:First cool site was 'the liquid oxygen barbecue by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
    First for me too. I hoestly was looking for that last week, but couldn't find it after 15 seconds of searching.

    I have ADD now, so gave up after that. Thanks. I remember watching it on my DECstation with 21" color monitor.

  16. Exhibit A by Snufu · · Score: 1

    in the case for net neutrality.

  17. First Sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first ones I remember were Compuserve.com and Excite.com. Excite is still with us but Compuserve died a long time ago. First search engine I used was Altavista.

  18. Re:First cool site was 'the liquid oxygen barbecue by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    Also note the lack of safety equipment. Those were some heady days, dl, heady days.

  19. Good times. by ColaMan · · Score: 1

    NCSA Mosaic and the coffee pot with the camera on it.

    My ISP - Ozemail - had a reasonably good home page. All the shareware archives were great - Simtelnet. AARNet for me (the Australia Academic and Research Network) - they held good mirrors of shareware sites.

    A lot of tiny little user pages linked via webrings, although that was a little bit later.

    Searching sucked. Google really cleaned up that space.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
    1. Re:Good times. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > NCSA Mosaic and the coffee pot with the camera on it.

      The very first webcam!

      Now it's cosplay girls making their coffee on my webcam...

      "She'll see I'm not so tough... just because I'm in love with a webcam girl...." *sigh*

    2. Re:Good times. by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      I used to be a big fan of Altavista, and as I was running UUCP nodes for mail and USENET ('exnet', 'exnet2') of the mapping project run by the same guy.

      I also remember when some new company started jamming up all my HTTP server capacity (and my horribly expensive 64kpbs line to London Docklands for international live IP connectivity) presumably trying to overcome 'latency'. A little company beginning with 'G'. I sent a nice note to their engineers suggesting that they be a little more careful in their spidering, but to this day I still have to defend against them actually bringing my servers down by accident. What was it, ah yes, "Google" indeed!

      Rgds

      Damon

      Oblig: http://www.exnet.com/springboa...

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    3. Re:Good times. by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      The coffee pot was at MIT and an example of IOT and decades before IOT.

    4. Re:Good times. by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "Searching sucked. Google really cleaned up that space"

      I was working Internet tech support back then and was one of the 1st on the team to discover Google, which was probably thanks to Slashdot as I was reading it regularly for more than a year before signing up.
      It was shocking how much quicker it was than any established search engine, even AltaVista which used to keep so much cached in RAM.
      But the real advantage was that the truly relevant pages where almost always at the top of the list and you never had to go beyond the 1st page when other engines may have what you really wanted 2, 3 or more pages down

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  20. US Information Sources on Paul Bernardo Killings by mykepredko · · Score: 2

    This will clearly label me as Canadian, but in the run up to the trial, the judge put a gag order on information in order to provide a jury pool that hadn't formed opinions based on news reports of the rather sensational kidnapping and murders of two teenage girls as well as then uncommon knowledge that Mr. Bernardo was thought to be the "Scarborough Rapist" who was the subject of a manhunt in Toronto in the 1980s.

    The news reports and other information about Paul Bernardo and his wife Karla could only be found on sites located outside of Canada and was one of the first examples of how the Interwebs would bypass and subvert laws.

  21. When it was like a small club by paiute · · Score: 1

    Remember when you would check every day to see what sites had come online the day before. And then check all five of them out?

    By the way, notice the quote: "Imagine if all newspapers became Internet service providers, now that would change the media landscape for sure," Daniels quipped.

    Today, I am obliged to send Comcast $150 bucks a month, but I am reluctant to send the local newspaper a few bucks a month for access. What if the local paper had the wisdom in 1990 to become an ISP and wire the city with their page as your home page? They would not be going extinct.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:When it was like a small club by esonik · · Score: 1

      When I discovered the internet in 1993 there was Yanoff's list. http://www.cryan.com/yanoff.php

      I would go through then entries one by one (mostly ftp sites) trying to find interesting stuff.

    2. Re:When it was like a small club by realkiwi · · Score: 1

      It was still possible in 1994 to visit all the sites starting with www. !!!

      My favorites were Sun's guide to building sites and the Yale medical school style guide.

      My first site in 1995 got over a million visitors. We did a Cannes film festival site and the URL was on the big screen at the Tokyo central railway station, the one you see on TV all the time. Unfortunately it is lost forever, the Japanese ISP went broke in 2005 or about then.

      --
      realkiwi
  22. Fast page loading! by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    So fast.

    So clean.

    So awesome.

    So Doge.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  23. Thi smay not be the first but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer Purple.com

  24. Re:First cool site was 'the liquid oxygen barbecue by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

    Besides the LOX demo and his invention of Refrigerant R-406A "AutoFrost", George was an Alpha Hardware Hacker at Purdue who presented at Usenix conferences. He got a grant to work on multiprocessing, and so he took two VAX 780's, and connected them by the backplane, creating a multiprocessor VAX. Digital Equipment liked it so much that they made a product of it, called the VAX/782. The CPU clock was 5 MHz and there were a lot of DIP-package digital logic ICs in there, with lots of space between them on the PCBs.

  25. Tim, and others, not Gore! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So happy the CNN source article started with Tim. Anyone else and shame! ...but CNN did call themselves out as a "pioneer", so the article was self-shaming in the end...

    Long live Tim and CERN!

  26. My Back door to the Internet by pepsikid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In 1994, BBSs were still the dominant experience for the common man. However, the University had a dial-up line that was configured to use a Gopher client as shell, for purposes of searching an online card catalog for one of the libraries. I found I could use the search engines of the day, Archie and Jughead (and Veronica?) to find hosts offering free access to Lynx (the text-only browser) and even Telnet "gateways". Cyberspace.com was offering free trial Unix accounts, literally with no verification. They offered Pine, storage space and plenty of other things. I could now surf the whole existing web, Gopherspace, read Usenet and download files and warez from there. Since Zmodem was borked by the Gopher client I was connected through, I couldn't download directly. So, I used Pine to re-mail them to myself at a local BBS which had a nightly UUCP connection where it exchanged email (with bangs as well as @) and updated it's select Usenet posts.

    At one point, I struggled to run DOSSLIP and DOSLYNX directly on my PC, but this never compared to just using a BBS dialup program and doing things on the terminal. I still use Lynx and (Al)Pine several times a week!

    Another Lynx trick came in handy 5 years later: You could telnet to password.io.com from anywhere in the world, and log on as guest. Lynx was configured as the shell, and you would then be presented with the minimalist web-based customer tools found at http://password.io.com/ to reset your password, update your address, etc. IO forgot to disable browsing the filesystem (press g, period, enter). Also, IO never enforced uniform /home/user/ directory permissions or audited active accounts. As a result, through 2004, when IO was taken over by Prismnet (or later), you could roam around and directly view many customer's private files, email, and IO's sensitive system areas. This was a direct back-door into everything! That was a full two years after IOCOM "hardened" their network to sell network security services.

    The Illuminati Online website is archived by an old employee here: http://io.fondoo.net/

    1. Re:My Back door to the Internet by adolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Are you me?

      I remember it being cyberspace.org, not .com. I also recall that it wasn't a trial at all, but that it survived on kick-backs from the local telco for connection fees from long-distance callers. The phone bills - those are things my parents will never forget. Likewise on the MS-DOS based SLIP connections: It sure seemed like it ought to be better, but packetization delays with TCP/IP over a 14.4k modem made it fairly hellish compared to just using a Telemate for a terminal emulator.

      Around the same time I was also using a borrowed, freebie alumni account on the local University's VAX, with almost no storage quota. It was nice, but their modems were only 9600bps, backed by a 56k leased line to Sprint.

      Later on, I discovered io.com and their 10 megabyte disk quota (with lots more, temporarily, for free if you asked nice) seemed dreamy in comparison. This lead to IRC and a decent Usenet feed, which lead to a lost childhood. 9600 became kind of slow for this use, but Delphi provided just enough Unix-y stuff to get to an io.com shell reliably at somewhat higher speeds. (I still hate web-based forums and long for the simplicity of tin, even though tin itself was considered ridiculously featureful at the time.)

      Security was lax, but people (everywhere) made the Internet a much friendlier and trusting place than it is in today's secure-by-default, impossible-to-share-anything mentality (which isn't really any better). It wasn't long after I discovered that /home/* wasn't locked down at all, that I also discovered how to keep some of my own files to myself.

      I also liked io.com's announcements, where jrcloose and company would rant, often in some depth, about whatever nefarious technical struggle they were solving today, and Steve Jackson himself would sometimes write about...whatever the fuck Steve wanted to write about. I learned a lot from those pages (though I can't call them blogs, because blogs weren't a thing yet).

      Muscle memory still requires me to type "ping io.com" when checking a system for DNS and IP connectivity.

      Ah, the freewheeling days of yore, where building a mail server just meant setting up Sendmail, some manner of POP3 and IMAP access, sorting out the MX record, and just leaving port 25 open for all and sundry to use -- because there was just no need to do anything more restrictive at the time.

      And the Corel NetWinder, where everyone was sure that ARM was the future -- 18 years ago. http://www.netwinder.org/about...

      Are we there yet?

      Oh. Right: Back on topic, I was a kid then. Getting this shit working in useful (and/or interesting) ways required problem-solving skills, which are processes that are now indelibly burned into my brain's wiring.

      These days, I can troubleshoot just about anything.

    2. Re:My Back door to the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ..Security was lax, but people (everywhere) made the Internet a much friendlier and trusting place than it is in today's secure-by-default, impossible-to-share-anything mentality (which isn't really any better).

      This is a thing that a lot of the younger audience won't understand, there were known security holes in a lot of the systems but we didn't really care as no-one abused them.

      As an example, from around mid-late '93 to Dec 1997 I allowed anyone who could drive a ftp client to upload pages anonymously to a 'public' section of my web server here in the UK, there were all sorts of things there from early Java programmers, Texan Bands, Digital artists, Fan clubs, people just playing with html..the only rule I had in place was 'no pornography' and, for all the years it ran, there wasn't any uploaded. Considering that all accesses were anonymous, and that they could overwrite all the stuff that other people uploaded, there was no vandalism..I allowed cgi scripts to be run, there were no attempts to 'hack' my server..the people using the service were, without prompting, taking the great man at his word and not 'pishing in the water supply'.

      There was a 'community' spirit back in the early days, I think partially because for a lot of the people involved it was the same sort of spirit which used to exist all over society when they were younger, back where you didn't have to lock your doors when you weren't in and it wasn't a strange thing for neighbours to come into your house 'unannounced' (some of us lived in such societies up 'till the late '70s, then the rot set in).

    3. Re:My Back door to the Internet by pepsikid · · Score: 1

      Hahah, I was dialed into a local number to the University's free Gopher-based card catalog, but I was telnetting to cyberspace.??? from there for my free 30-day trial shell account(s). Pretty sure it was .com. I don't even know where it was physically located. The domain's changed hands many times since then.

      IO was a fun, sometimes strange place to work. When were you a customer? I worked there 2000-2001. Did you see the archival copy I linked to? Lots of interesting pictures, and you can even see the employee-only intranet pages with procedure, schedules and web tools.

    4. Re:My Back door to the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gopher had this "issue" where if you went to a dead link, it would dump you out at what was essentially a telnet prompt. Oh the fun I had with that. :)

    5. Re:My Back door to the Internet by adolf · · Score: 1

      Upon further thought, maybe they did have a plan for charging people money -- if they weren't getting monetary kickbacks from the phone company for a particular user.

      Or maybe the plans really were 30 days. It's been a long, long time. It was a strange place and I sometimes saw discussions over what they were doing was legal or not.

      I was an IO customer for probably 3 or 4 years, ending somewhere around 2000.

  27. Incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The minimalist design featured black text with blue links on a white background."

    No it didn't. A quick glance at the HTML shows that it's in fact using browser defaulted font/colors.

  28. Malware Warning at CERN site by jIyajbe · · Score: 1

    I started clicking around, and Google popped up a malware warning for the "Astrophysics Abstracts" link at http://info.cern.ch/hypertext/... .

    Anyone know of a way to confirm or deny this warning, other than letting my computer get infected?

    --
    "Don't blame the log for the fire." --Andrew Ratshin
    1. Re:Malware Warning at CERN site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is full of shit (what else is new). There's no malware at that link, in fact if you click the Abstract Indexes link it just goes to a 403 error at ibiblio.

  29. Hot hot hot sauce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, there were two instances that stand out in my memory.

    One was the Hot Sauce web site. It was back in 1994 or earlier 1993 perhaps, but I do remember it in 1994. It sold hot sauce. Hot hot hot or something was the tag-line.

    And before that I do remember watching the Sunergy broadcast where Marc showed his new Browser XMosaic. I don't remember the web site that was show cased in the episode hosted by John Gage. I think this took place in early 1994 or late 1993. I forgot when, but it was something to watch. A remarkable event.

  30. Jennicam by weave · · Score: 2
  31. White background? by jb_nizet · · Score: 1
    Did it really have a white background?

    I don't see any background color specified in the markup, and I'm not even sure it was possible to do that at that time.

    The first web page I saw, in one of Netscape's first version, was later, but I remember that Netscape found it cool to have a grayish background back then rather than a white one. I think Mosaic had a gray background too. What was the browser used to display that first web page? How did it look like?

    1. Re:White background? by BuGless · · Score: 1

      The first browsers, both Netscape and Mosaic had a grayish background.
      By not specifying any colours you'd get #000 black text and an around #ccc gray background.

    2. Re:White background? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First browsers?

      *cough*

      Before Netscape, there was AIR-Mosaic, the actual first _commercial_ web browser. It was in a kit known as Internet in a Box; and it definitely came out before Netscape.

  32. Namely... by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

    Cello. Followed by Mosaic.

    --
    Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
  33. Re:First cool site was 'the liquid oxygen barbecue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man y'all motherfuckers are old

  34. And yet HTML is still shit by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 0

    * Instead of browsers generating errors about missing tags, they silently accept it. *facepalm*

    * Who was the idiot that thought case insensitivity for tags name was a good idea??

    A) Browsers now have to accept twice as many tags.
    e.g. &amp; and &AMP; both generate ampersands. You can start with <BLOCKQUOTE> and end with </blockquote>, etc.

    B) We dumb grave accent tags, like &Agrave; for À and &agrave; for à which prevents browsers from converting all tags to either uppercase (or lowercase) and generating a hash from _that_ that for fast lookup.

    * Instead of using unique characters for begin tag: < >, and end tag: such as { }, browsers instead have to waste time looking ahead if the next character is a '/' when they find a '<' char.
      i.e.
        <a name='foo'>...</a>

    compared to the simpler to parse:
      <a name='foo'>...{a}

    * Some of the HTML abbreviations make zero sense. These are the arrow glyphs:

    &larr;
    &rarr;
    &uarr;
    &darr;

    /Sarcasm Argh, matey! What, &left; &right; &up; &down; weren't available?!

    At least it isn't a badly designed and bloated as XML.

    1. Re:And yet HTML is still shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but your "simpler to parse" idea is still a mess. If you're going to redesign HTML parsing to be sane, that isn't the way to go about it.

      I think a lisp-style syntax tree would make a lot more sense, e.g. something like this:


      <html
        <head
          <title foo>>
        <body
          <h1 Title>
            Content goes <b here>>>

      You could express optional bits like onClick, style, href, etc as key/value pairs, such as <a [href "www.example.com"] link example>.

      I'd probably still keep the case insensitivity for tags, though. I have no strong feelings on it either way, but I can see how some might prefer making the tags stand out with ALL-CAPS and others might not. No point forcing one on everybody.

    2. Re:And yet HTML is still shit by raftpeople · · Score: 1

      "Who was the idiot that thought case insensitivity for tags name was a good idea??" - everyone? reduces human error substantially and is trivially handled by computer.

    3. Re:And yet HTML is still shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Who was the idiot that thought case insensitivity for tags name was a good idea??
      A) Browsers now have to accept twice as many tags.

      Uh, no.

      All you have to do while parsing is detect that you're in a tag, and bitwise-or 0x20 on each alphabetical byte to get the lower-case version. No need to duplicate any tags at all.

    4. Re:And yet HTML is still shit by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      > "Who was the idiot that thought case insensitivity for tags name was a good idea??" - everyone? reduces human error substantially

      As someone who remembers the arguments about this, it _engenders_ human error.. Having to wade through inconsistent, case insensitive source code is an ongoing source of error in all source code, and an ongoing issue with html and mysql an dother case insensitive languages. It's not quite as bad as the confusion of mishandled "camel case" in arbitrarily long function names. Butt was as confusing then as it is now that "" can be rendered as "hTML>", "", "", etc., and that the closing tags need only match the case insensitive version of the tag.

    5. Re:And yet HTML is still shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      '..* Who was the idiot that thought case insensitivity for tags name was a good idea??'

      The idiot who doesn't like ambiguities?, the idiot woke up one morning with a hangover and the realisation that he'd also have to factor in that there'd be SHOUTY MCSHOUTFACE IDIOTS OUT THERE WHO TYPE ALL SORTS OF FSCKING SHIT IN CAPS ?

      In case you weren't there at the time, there WAS AN AWFUL LOT OF tHiS SoRt oF ShIt gOiNg oN as well...especially when multiple people of differing typing abilities worked on things, especially when the suits started waking up to the possibilities of the new horrors they could inflict via the WWW, and you got given .HTM files generated on a DOS box full of inconsistent but mainly SCREAMING CAPS TAGS to put up on a Unix server that had to be tweaked before they went live.

    6. Re:And yet HTML is still shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How most of your job interviews conclude:

      "Uh, thanks for your interesting perspective, UnknownSoldier, but we decided to go in a different direction{.}"

    7. Re:And yet HTML is still shit by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      Browsers now have to accept twice as many tags.

      To make your attempted point accurate, you'd actually have to say that they accepted an exponential number of tags 2^N where N is the length of the tag, e.g., "a" could be either "a" or "A", but "body" could be "bodY", "boDy", ..., "BODy", or "BODY".

      Nobody does that in a real HTML parser: they simply translate the tag name either to all-lower or all-upper case and then do the comparison.

      We dumb [sic] grave accent tags, like &Agrave; for à and &agrave; for à which prevents browsers from converting all tags to either uppercase (or lowercase)...

      No it doesn't. The lexical analyzer handles all of this. If it sees an '&' character, it does the case-sensitive lookup for what follows and then returns the actual character that it represents back to the parser. If it's not an '&', then it does the case-insensitive lookup. Really, this isn't that hard.

      At least it isn't a badly designed and bloated as XML.

      HTML derives from SGML. If you think HTML is bad, SGML is much, much worse. XML is much easier to parse than HTML which is why XHTML exists.

      The worst think about parsing HTML (that you didn't even mention) was the fact that some elements (as they're correctly called, not "tags") have open tags, but no (or optional) close tags, e.g., <p>.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    8. Re:And yet HTML is still shit by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      The simply solution would be to make everything lower case like C.

      No SHOUTING
      No MiXeDcAsE.

    9. Re:And yet HTML is still shit by raftpeople · · Score: 1

      " case insensitive source code is an ongoing source of error in all source code" - how? I've been coding my entire life and I've never run into any issue with case insensitive languages, only case sensitive languages.

    10. Re:And yet HTML is still shit by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      I do apologize for the lack of clarity in my message, I forgot that it would be rendered as markup, so my comments were garbled.

      Is an "HTML" tag closed by a "html" tag, a "hTML" tag, or any of the other 14 variants? Yes it is. Multiply the versions of every single tag or case insensitive filename, field, or label of any time and one faces a serious burden merging valid that follows a different style, ensuring that comments about tags are not themselves considered tags by accident, The need to regularize all such code makes code slower, more fragile, and more vulnerable to typographical errors obscured by changes in case.

  35. So we've been upgraded? by clovis · · Score: 1

    This Internet thing ... is it some kind of upgrade of the Fidonet they didn't tell us about?

    Enough stalling. I've been trying to recall exactly when I moved from BBS systems to Internet access at home, and it kind of runs together in my mind. I first got AT&T worldnet in 1995. There wasn't that much difference in content available between BBS in a large city and the internet, or at least for what I wanted to see. I downloaded slackware onto a bunch of floppies around 1995, but I think that was from a BBS. Buzz on ZMODEM, buzz on.

    The earliest web site I accessed that I remember the name of was AltaVista, and the second that I remember was portalofevil.com, which wasn't all that early. It's just what I remember. In between those two were all the various universities that had some presence online.
    That was back when Lynx was still useful.

  36. Re:First cool site was 'the liquid oxygen barbecue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And so will you be one day..

  37. The first search war between Yahoo! and AltaVista by localroger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For tech types AltaVista won because it was more comprehensive and had a cool array of search narrowing tools.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  38. IMDB etc. by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 1

    Aahh. and look how fast that page loads, devoid of all the needless crap we pile on now.

    I don't have a grey beard (it wasn't THAT long ago and I was young) but I do remember downloading the entire IMDB as a file and parsing it with a reader. They would post periodic updates.

    I was also the designer of the original set of icon buttons for web version of IMDB, which were made on my Amiga. Good times.

    -Mike

    1. Re:IMDB etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was also the designer of the original set of icon buttons for web version of IMDB, which were made on my Amiga. Good times.

      That reminds me of the time when, as part of a new job, I took over responsibility for the web servers...imagine my surprise when I found that they were using a whole raft of buttons I'd designed and released freely into the wilds four-five years earlier (I'd never heard of the GPL at that point, it just seemed like the right thing to do)...and they'd no idea I'd originally designed them when they'd employed me (the graphics work I'd done over the years I'd always regarded as a 'hobby', and a way of keeping slightly saner when doing long hours of coding and systems admin work, so never bothered ever putting this stuff on my CV).

      Fun days...

  39. first web site by typhoonius · · Score: 1

    It's a testament to how well designed the web was that the first web page still renders perfectly well in modern web browsers. If you view the source, you can see it was actually written in a proto-HTML and uses tags and attributes that aren't used today.

  40. Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember the guys at the new start Google sending me a bottle of Wine for help in promoting their new search engine on my web site - The Cybervillage.

  41. First site to perform a service. by InterGuru · · Score: 1

    My site, Interguru.com , set up in 1995, may well be the first site to use then then-new file upoad facility. It performed a service, translating email address books from one format to another, such as Eudora to Pine, rather than just displaying information.

    Does anyone know of a earlier site that used file uploads?

  42. First few sites by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    Best "search engine" at the time was probably gopher, until yahoo came around. Most of my web, was nothing more than bbs sites, on dialup.

  43. Brings back memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually remember logging into the CERN web site when it first came out (thought it may have been a week or two after it went "live", so I probably missed the very first version). I recall going to it with a text mode browser, seeing how the links worked, thinking it was okay, and then going on to other sources for information at the time (remember gopher?) Little did I know how that idea would explode...

    But the site wasn't minimalist by intentional design - early versions of HTML didn't support any kind of way of rendering text differently - in fact line mode browsers didn't render text differently at all - links just had numbers after them you could enter to access the link, and even basic formatting like bold and underline came later.

    1. Re:Brings back memories by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      Talking of Cern, I used the graphics on their Snowboard and Ski Club web site to learn to Snowboard at the local dry ski slope some time in the mid 90's. Sadly they no longer offer this fine service but I have not seen anything better since.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  44. Old Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I liked TidBits about Apple news. Fetch for FTP. Eudora for mail. Netscape as a browser of choise over all others. Usenet had some things that were not porn or anarchy or some fetish.

    Games were downloadable for free. Shareware. Before there was internet circa 1992 there was BBS, for the prior decade!

    1. Re:Old Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newswatcher! That interface needs to be duplicated for web based forums!

  45. Zombo.com! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.zombo.com/

    You can do anything at Zombo.com. Anything at all!

  46. The first Nike.com website by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    Back in 1995, when the "under construction" signs were popular, my friends and I stumbled upon www.nike.com. Their site displayed a photo of a rotary phone, along with the words "The web site you've reached is not in service." My friends and I rolled our eyes at that.

    1. Re:The first Nike.com website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in 1995, when the "under construction" signs were popular...

      Mine's was the site with the "Under Demolition" sign (around 1997)...an early run-in with the control freaks who eventually took over the internet meant that one of my servers was more-or-less gutted of its content (nothing Illegal, was part of a 'land grab' by the suits who, when asked about it two years earlier said 'what's the web?' and 'go ahead..').
      That's when I got out of that side of things.
         

    2. Re:The first Nike.com website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note: just in case anyone quibbles when I said

      '..who eventually took over the internet..'

      I do mean internet there, and not just the web.

  47. The Real First WebCam by lucasjs · · Score: 1
  48. I remember.... by jkg2 · · Score: 0

    ....looking at that page using Mosaic back in 93 or so. And of course Gopher, which mostly died out as HTML came on the scene.

  49. Home page going back to 1994 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I about 10 years ago I put together the story of my first WWW pages. Both the 'history' and the actual pages seem very antique now.

    http://brenthugh.com/Musicihist/history.html

  50. Uppercase Tags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew there was a reason I was using uppercase tags for years...

    It was normal once.

  51. Yanoff List by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    Was one of the first things I remember making it to the web, was Scott's list. Though technically the list was first posted to bulletin boards,ftp servers and yes, finger.

    For the young ones, here is what the internet looked like in 1993 The list itself was available by html in 1994, if not earlier
    Copyright 1994 "http://www.cs.uwm.edu/~yanoff/yanoff.html" Scott Yanoff

    And some background:

    The Yanoff List: meeting the demand for a concise list of ``what's out
    there''

    In September 1991, Scott Yanoff, a computer science student at the
    University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee, created a list of six items---
    telnet addresses of Internet information services. He posted the list
    to internet and service related newsgroups like alt.bbs.internet and
    news.answers. According to Scott, ``I posted my list one day and next
    thing I knew people were writing to me with things to add to the list''
    (Yanoff, 1993a). After that, Scott added the list to the University's
    ftp site, gopher, and set up an email list to reach people who could
    not access the list by those methods. Scott describes how the list
    grew from contributions from other people, ``I owe most of the list to
    OTHER people . . . that's what is great about the Internet . . . I
    decided to share my list, and everyone else shares their knowledge in
    helping to contribute to the list'' (Yanoff, 1993a). Today, the list,
    popularly known as ``The Internet Services List,'' (Yanoff, 1993b)
    contains listings for more than 135 separate services accessible
    through telnet, ftp, finger, gopher, and email. Daniel Dern (1994)
    calls Yanoff's list ``one of the most frequently cited or referenced
    documents on the Internet.''

  52. And a generation of crapware followed by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    To this day, websites don't render the same way on all browsers and it's damn near impossible to design a page the same way that you used to design things in a desktop publisher. In addition, there are still a legion of incompetent page designers who insist on making things only work properly on Internet Explorer.

  53. Printing IMDB by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    Not only do I remember when IMDb was a Usenet created list, but I printed it out on my university's printers (the really old kind that had those perforated holes on the side of the printout) to show to people offline.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    1. Re:Printing IMDB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but do you remember what the IMDB was originally called?
      "Those Eyes" in rec.arts.movies. It started as a List of pretty actresses, and the films that they were in, and was quickly and simply known as "THE LIST". Other Lists were created over time, and then Needham created the Scripts and Database that tied them all together.

      We had various ways of printing it out as well. By far the fastest was this monster called the "Bright Page Printer", that was capable of a couple of pages... per second. It was the size of a Honda, and had an interlocked and motorized steel cover for when things went wrong, which when they did, they went very wrong. The paper was very wide, just under 19", and was designed to be stored in a 19" Rack rather than in a cabinet.
      We mostly used it once a week to back up, all of it, on paper, the 20MB Disk that fed our four MODCOMPS.

  54. Lightspeed's by doccus · · Score: 1

    I was quite into modding windows 3.1 (and Widows NT 3.1 and 3.51as well) at the time (late 90s) and had it running really well, plus a few really rare releases of programs that normally would nerver have run on it. So I frequented these pages that dealt with that.
    Oh, and Nathan's page with the flames and IE is Evil! Needless to say it was a well designed if basic site,,,

  55. Still wasn't the first by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    We had web sites in the US way back into the 1980s. Xerox had hyperlinks, embeded into their docs. We also had internet news and archives on certain sites as well as gopher, etc. HTML is actually an American AIrforce invention, from the 1960s. So they're celebrating their version of the web. One copied from US sources. One built on top of all the US contributions.

    1. Re:Still wasn't the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You omitted your sources. There were SGML theoretical texts but no HTML. Now I no longer wonder how my notebooks winded up in CERN, they reached Xerox first.

    2. Re:Still wasn't the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > We had web sites in the US way back into the 1980s. Xerox had hyperlinks, embeded into their docs.

      They were missing the one thing that makes the Web a "World Wide" Web - URLs.

  56. Not modified since April 1996 by ajyand · · Score: 1
  57. Kuroshin.org! by Optali · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, Kuroshin.org and tons of alt.linux newsgroups in Usenet... Ah, and alt.religion.kibology!!!

    --
    -- 29A the number of the Beast