Slashdot Mirror


Online Fame Distracts 9th-Grader Who Built That Clock Mistaken For A Bomb (washingtonpost.com)

An anonymous Slashdot reader writes: This week the Washington Post ran a long profile of Ahmed Mohamed, the 14-year-old boy whose home-made clock got him arrested after school officials and the local police mistook it for a bomb last summer. The Justice Department is currently investigating the incident -- while the school district is suing the Texas attorney general, and the boy's family is suing the school district. But Ahmed has just returned back to Texas, and spoke to the press -- including a local Fox news affiliate which later broadcast a commentary saying his family was obsessed with fame and plotted the arrest.

Over the last year Ahmed's read everything that appeared online about him, but never responds because he doesn't want to give in to anger. The Post writes that while some kids at school called him ISIS Boy, "Sympathetic crowdfunders raised $18,000 for his education. He visited the White House, the Google Science Fair and the president of his home country of Sudan (a wanted war criminal, but Mohamed said it would be rude not to accept the invitation)." Though he'd like to return to the U.S. someday for college, he's been living in Qatar, where a government organization paid for private schooling for him and his sister. But the Post says he still sometimes imagines what his life might've been like if the incident had never happened. "By now he could have invented something new -- not just a clock that only took him a few minutes to put together from parts in his family's garage, which was full of '90s-era electronics from when his uncle ran a chain called Beeper Warehouse."

45 of 319 comments (clear)

  1. He didn't "build" anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    He took a click out of its casing and took it to school at the suggestion of his father, hoping to start a racial incident. They succeeded.

    1. Re:He didn't "build" anything by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So what does a Micronta clock have to do with Heathkit?

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    2. Re:He didn't "build" anything by glitch! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The photos show a circuit board printed with "Micronta" which is a Tandy/Radio Shack trademark.

      Yes, he took apart an alarm clock, made it look like a Hollywood bomb, and claimed he "invented" it. He is a liar, a swindler, and a piece of shit human. He tried to play the media with his pity party. Then he left the country. Good riddance! But someone left the door open and the vermin got back in again.

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
    3. Re:He didn't "build" anything by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is actually true of most people who get their 15 minutes of fame these days. I mean shit, the black lives matter movement is all over the media, but they don't give a shit about an actual black life unless it involves all of 1) a gun 2) a cop 3) a stolen case of cigarettes, a stolen bike, or a stolen car. But, that's the world we live in today: The best way to get presidential involvement is to be a liar, a cheater, or a petty thug who happened to receive an overzealous (but in many cases, deserved) response. And everybody reading this knows it.

    4. Re:He didn't "build" anything by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      So what does a Micronta clock have to do with Heathkit?

      Uh-oh, somebody's not a real nerd.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:He didn't "build" anything by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 4, Informative

      On the contrary, I have built MANY Heathkits, up to and including a 70s era 25" color TV and a "Hero Jr" robot.

      But Heathkit was a separate company, never a Tandy/Radio Shack brand, like Micronta, Radio Shack's kit line were called "ArcherKits", and were nowhere near as nice as Heathkits....

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    6. Re: He didn't "build" anything by Pseudonym · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why was this labeled flamebait? It's exactly what happened.

      It is not what happened. What actually happened is a sequence of events that could have happened to any of us when we were kids.

      A 14 year old kid took a clock apart and put it back together. The word "invention" was thrown around (he may or may not have used the word himself; this is unclear), but the kid was absolutely clear about his motives: he wanted to understand how it worked. Many, many Slashdotters can relate to this. This happened to me when I was a kid.

      He was proud of himself and took it to school to show it off to a world which isn't very impressed by such things. He was told to put it away but couldn't help himself. Many, many Slashdotters can relate to this. This happened to me when I was a kid.

      What most Slashdotters can't relate to is having the cops called on you and being the subject of a viral shitstorm for doing this. This did not happen to me when I was a kid. The kid is not an inventor. He might be a genius (his measured IQ may well be in the top 2%), or he might not be. The central point is that he is one of us, and we take care of our own. When normal geek childhood is criminalised, that's news for nerds and stuff that matters.

      There has been a lot of talk (with no actual evidence, I might add) that the kid's father somehow engineered this, or wanted an incident, or to make a point. Even if that were true, the point was indeed made. So many social media commenters (and sadly Slashdot comments have devolved to the level of social media commenters) concentrate on what the kid did wrong, and don't stop to ponder just why it's so easy for incidents like this to happen if your skin has a bit of melanin in it.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    7. Re:He didn't "build" anything by jrumney · · Score: 2

      If what you say is true, it is quite concerning that his father had such confidence that such actions would spark a racially motivated incident.

    8. Re:He didn't "build" anything by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm looking at a Heathkit micrometer, and at least the power supply is clearly marked "Micronta".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:He didn't "build" anything by Beeftopia · · Score: 2

      took it to school at the suggestion of his father, hoping to start a racial incident.

      There's no actual evidence for the conspiracy theories. The police didn't charge him for a hoax bomb and they actually investigated it.

      Everything else is just pure speculation.

    10. Re:He didn't "build" anything by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 2

      So killing someone without trial is okay in your book.

      Good to know you support a literal police state where police can kill anyone because idiots like you will support them.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    11. Re:He didn't "build" anything by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 2

      But the point is they weren't using acceptable lethal force. Have you been hiding under a fucking rock, you ignoramus?

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    12. Re:He didn't "build" anything by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The grand juries seem to disagree. How many of these cops have been convicted of manslaughter/murder? I think the unacceptable use of lethal force argument fails the test.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    13. Re:He didn't "build" anything by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 2

      Cops have been shown to lie under oath. Good to know you'll just accept whatever cops say without question.

      So many Slashdotters want a literal police state these days.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    14. Re:He didn't "build" anything by tsotha · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He was most likely put up to it by his activist dad, particularly since he knew exactly what to say to the cops - he told them the truth, but in such a way that they would think he's lying. That's not something you know when you're 14.

    15. Re:He didn't "build" anything by Alypius · · Score: 3, Interesting

      despite mounting video evidence that is almost never the case.

      Citation needed. I'd be willing to bet that the GP was alluding to that Gentle Giant (TM) in Ferguson, where the evidence supported the officer. But hey, let's perpetuate the lie that was "Hands Up, Don't Shoot!"

    16. Re:He didn't "build" anything by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 2

      Which explains why cops can just say "they were attacking me" and idiots will believe them without question.

      So obviously, you would allow riot control police to just start shooting everyone in the crowd.

      It's funny and concerning how so many people are willing to let the police be the judge, jury and executioner.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    17. Re:He didn't "build" anything by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      Classic tactic: racists calling everyone else the racist.

      ...Wow, you actually said that.

      Reflect on it for a minute and then come back and explain to me why you feel that you aren't a racist.

      Here's a hint: someone being violent is NOT a reason to kill them. Bunch of fascists suggesting that it's okay to kill anyone just for being violent.

      The thing is, you yourself are behaving much like a fascist would, and you're being bigoted. The only difference between you and any other bigot is that you think speaking on behalf of minorities automatically gives you the high ground. But I'm here to tell you that you're quite wrong.

      That said, if somebody is behaving violently, sometimes that is reason to kill them. It really depends on the circumstances. If we follow what you just said however, then the cops had no business shooting at the Pulse Nightclub shooter, and they should have just asked him to lay down his weapons and turn himself in. Of course, a rational person would say that's both insane and irrational. But, I don't think anybody has ever accused you of being neither sane nor rational.

    18. Re: He didn't "build" anything by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Zimmerman wasn't a cop, racist or not, he was a member of a neighborhood watch, and ultimately, whatever you think about race, he should not have done what he did.

      I'm aware of that. I'm also aware that the physical evidence and witness testimony fully supports his version of the events that transpired. And I don't know about you, but if somebody is slamming my head into pavement, and I had a gun on me, I would have done exactly as he did. Even the witnesses who were in favor of Trayvon Martin made this much clear.

      They could have at least made him stand up in court and assert his affirmative claim of self-defense, but the prosecutor, nope, couldn't manage it.

      You're quite uneducated, to be honest. No prosecutor anywhere ever can make the accused testify in their own defense; that would be a clear violation of the 5th amendment. And you know what? No defendant ever does unless either they're insane or they've literally run out of options. Why? Because the prosecutor will get to cross examine you, and during a cross examination a good prosecutor can make you look guilty of assassinating a pope that is still very much alive. The Zimmerman case was so airtight that they didn't even want to prosecute to begin with, as even the detectives who investigated the case honestly believed it to be justified homicide. There never, at any time, would have been any reason for Zimmerman "stand up" in court.

    19. Re:He didn't "build" anything by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even if your claim is true and he did plan the whole thing as a publicity stunt, it only worked because he knew that if the school saw a brownish Muslim student with some electronics they'd go into full bomb-scare-panic, while a white Christian student with exactly the same device would have been ignored.

    20. Re: He didn't "build" anything by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

      If you read the post carefully, it states that "a local Fox news affiliate [...] later broadcast a commentary saying his family was obsessed with fame and plotted the arrest". If unsubstantiated commentary from a local Fox News affiliate now counts as evidence, Deity help us all.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    21. Re: He didn't "build" anything by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      There were no witnesses to the start of the confrontation. There were witnesses during, whose attention was drawn by the sound of fighting, but none were present when Zimmerman and Trayvon met. If there were then the investigation would have been a lot easier. While the physical evidence shows there was certainly a fight, there is no way to tell who started the violence.

    22. Re: He didn't "build" anything by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      How do we teach people to not rape, steal, and kill each other?

      Yes, I'm Mr TFTFY today. Deal with it.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    23. Re: He didn't "build" anything by cryptizard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is more about it being the rule that when a police officer kills an unarmed black man they are almost never held accountable. That is a rule. You can argue a case here or a case there, but it is literally almost unheard of for a police officer to be fired let alone prosecuted for killing an unarmed black person. Even when they are caught on video using an illegal choke hold against a man who is not resisting, or shoot a guy trying to pull out his wallet after he said "I am about to pull out my wallet."

    24. Re:He didn't "build" anything by ninjaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Steve Wozniak (co-founder of Apple) spent the night in jail when he was high school for doing this kind of thing, and didn't get to meet the president:

      http://www.businessinsider.com...

    25. Re:He didn't "build" anything by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2

      "Micronta" didn't make anything. It was a brand name that Tandy used on clocks, multimeters, and other test equipment, which were generally made by Asian subcontractors.

      AFAIK, RS never offered a line powered digital clock as a kit. Certainly not the one repackaged by this kid. There are several sites online which compare his project to the original clock. It does appear to have been nothing more than removing the guts and putting them in another box.

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    26. Re:He didn't "build" anything by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. It was a publicity stunt. It's no different than the Clinton campaign hiring Kahn to speak at their convention and then a few days later the guy decides that he doesn't want all the publicity... after the world learns that he was scamming green cards.

    27. Re:He didn't "build" anything by tsotha · · Score: 2

      When people start shrieking "racist!" I know they've reached the end of valid arguments.

    28. Re:He didn't "build" anything by tsotha · · Score: 2

      The cops weren't "outsmarted" by anyone. And no, we should not put blame on him. The blame goes to his family, the press, and political interests in the US that want to use these kinds of made-up stunts as "teachable moments".

  2. Probably not by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Informative

    By now he could have invented something new

    Probably not.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      By now he could have invented something new

      Probably not.

      That is correct. Both Apple and Samsung has been awarded patents on "inventing something new" and are currently suing anyone with a semi-original thought.

    2. Re:Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably not.

      Certainly not. The only reason this boy enjoyed any fame at all is because he simultaneously satisfied several fetishes of the American Left. He was a minority child from a Muslim family who appeared to be interested in a technical or scientific subject. An electronic clock is not the sort of thing that will get you the blue ribbon at your state science fair, but that didn't matter to the politicos. Here was a politically correct family to use as a prop and they took full advantage, although arguably the family tried to take advantage too. Like so many things on the Left it's the appearance, not the merit or lack thereof that matters.

  3. Re:Liberal? by cpotoso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And I bet you are a moron.

  4. Invented? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Honestly, This is how bad it has become in the USA? This is considered invented?

    That means the kids that actually learn Arduino programming and make sumo bots are Fucking Alien Technomancer Magicians!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Invented? by newcastlejon · · Score: 4, Funny

      That means the kids that actually learn Arduino programming and make sumo bots are Fucking Alien Technomancer Magicians!

      You say that as if it were a bad thing.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    2. Re:Invented? by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 3, Funny

      That means the kids that actually learn Arduino programming and make sumo bots are Fucking Alien Technomancer Magicians!

      You say that as if it were a bad thing.

      His statement is also flawed, he said "Fucking Alien Technomancer Magicians". It stands to reason that any Alien Technomancer Magician who came to visit earth, being essentially an alien nerd, would naturally become a member of the biggest gathering of nerds on the planet earth, i.e.Slashdot and if this Alien Technomancer Magician didn't pass the rigorous admission process all members Slashdot must undergo he would really be a fraud, not a real nerd and certainly not a 'Techno Mancer'. Since it is a well know fact that no Slashdot member, like all nerds throughout the universe, has any kind of a sex life that involves partner these Fucking Alien Technomancer Magicians Lumpy speaks of cannot possibly exist. Now some of you might be tempted to ask: "But what if the species the Alien Technomancer Magician belongs to is asexual?". Asexual species don't really 'fuck' themselves to reproduce since that would involve a partner and an exchange of DNA but they do snog and exchange DNA so even if you define that as 'fucking', this hypothetical Fucking Alien Technomancer Magician would still need a partner which means he could never attain the title Technomancer Magician because in order to attain that title you must be a nerd and as was previously mentioned, it is a well known fact that nowhere in the universe do nerds have sex with partners. Thus it is quite clear that the titles 'fucker" and 'Technomancer Magician" are mutually exclusive.

  5. Re:Not a liberal by Ramze · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A 14 year old knows the difference between building and inventing. Ask any 14 year old who invented the telephone, the car, or the cotton gin. They may not know the correct answers, but they know the meaning. Then, ask them who currently manufactures cars and telephones. Very different answers.

    Your argument would work for a 5 year old, but not a 14 year old. Many 14 year olds are freshmen in high school and should have learned the difference between building and inventing back in elementary school.

    He didn't even make the clock -- he removed it from its housing and placed it into another housing. He made a box for a clock... one he stated he specifically chose to disguise what it was.

    No sane person would believe his story that he invented a clock and wanted to show it off to his teacher at school -- no, he pulled a clock out of its housing, hid it inside another housing on purpose to disguise it, and then showed it to kids knowing they'd think it could be a bomb. 14 year olds aren't innocent 'lil ignorant angels that don't know what words mean. They have sex, do drugs, lie their asses off to their parents and elders, sneak out of their houses at night, and yes -- make fake bombs for attention. Not ALL of them, obviously, but yeah... he's 2 years shy of driving and holding down a part-time job in most states, not a baby to be coddled and forgiven for doing something he damned well knew was stupid and made up lies to cover it up.

  6. Re:Should be put on a no fly list... by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What was the stunt? Taking a non-bomb to school and waiting for the over-reaction from ignorant police? Seems the fix should be applied to the ignorant cops, not the child that taunted them. If the cops were competent, this would never have made the news. It would have been handled in a manner that didn't make a national event out of a clock.

  7. Re:Lots of flack for being called an "inventor"... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While repackaging a digital clock may not appear to take much in the way of technical skill to the minds of most of the highly technologically literate folks here at slashdot, truthfully even that is still something that most people would not necessarily think of ever trying to build, or at least not without following some instructions.

    Yep, most people would not think to repackage a clock because it ALREADY CAME IN A PERFECTLY GOOD CASE. There is no invention here, unless you want to claim that choosing to paint your room a different color, or changing the screen door on your home is invention.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  8. He's learning... by freeze128 · · Score: 2

    Over the last year Ahmed's read everything that appeared online about him, but never responds because he doesn't want to give in to anger.

    Welcome to the internet. It's full of stuff that is intended to make you angry. Most kids don't learn this until they're much older.

  9. Re:Not a liberal by argumentsockpuppet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wouldn't have put it that way, but you have a valid point. This is a kid who didn't do anything actually dangerous and was taken from a school in handcuffs. It was made worse because it's apparent it wouldn't haven't have happened if his skin had been light enough.

    There seem to be a lot of comments talking about the will or intent of the kid, but honestly it shouldn't matter. We put our children in a government mandated situation where we have to trust the institution with rights otherwise reserved to parent. We expect, and have every right to expect, the institution to handle discipline with consistency and good judgement. It's absolutely justified that we should react with outrage when they fail to do it in such a spectacular fashion. Don't forget this kid was pressured by authorities to sign something admitting to something he didn't do without parental or legal defense.

    I don't care what the kid did, kids do stupid stuff sometimes. I don't care what his parents did because having stupid parents shouldn't be an excuse to abuse kids. What I do care about is how the authorities put in charge of our children behave and in this case it was objectively terrible.

    That's going to happen. Kids are going to do stupid stuff. Parents are going to do stupid stuff. Authorities are going to react badly. You can't and shouldn't expect to be able to prevent every kid from ever doing something stupid. You can only do so much to prevent parents from being stupid. What we can and must do is prevent authorities from doing stupid stuff, particularly those who are given the authority of force.

  10. Re:plotted the arrest by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

    It wasn't made to look like a bomb. At most, it was made to look like an idiot's conception of a bomb: A circuit board with scary glowing red clock display. Anyone who actually gave it three seconds of thought would realise that it's missing any form of explosive. Even the school officials knew it wasn't a bomb, because if they had thought it was a bomb they would have immediately confiscated the device, physically kept him away from it, evacuated the building and called in the bomb disposal experts. This is not what they did: A teacher confiscated the device, he was sent before the principle, and local law enforcement were summoned to question him. They then arrested him for instigating a bomb scare. At no point in the process did any individual actually believe the device to be a bomb. Everyone involved was just concerned that someone else might think it could be a bomb.

  11. Leave the damned kid alone, go after the father by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ahmed is a genuine nerd, just as I was at his age. When I assembled and installed alarm systems from salvaged alarm parts I stated clearly and honestly that I had "built" them. To an electronics beginner even taking something apart and re-presenting it in a novel way gives great satisfaction. There is nothing fake-ass about any of it. It saddens me to read all these arbitrarily constructed harsh judgements here, which NONE of you would ever apply to your OWN children. At that age you have to compare the desire to handle and understand electronics to the act of doing nothing at all, watching television, or tunelessly strumming a guitar imagining you're a few songs away from screaming fame.

    The totality of the response by the school was a surprise to the boy... who may have been aware that his project might stir some suspicion but the boy also honestly believed he could 'diffuse' such concerns with the power of his own words, and the simple fact that the truth was on his side. It was a small thing, and (maybe) fun to give a little push back to any alarm. The fact that his science teacher had seen and approved of the project underscores this.

    Ahmed's father was another story. There was certainly a gleam in his eye as he participated in the project, knowing of the unique social forces and ugly escalating institutional response that was possible. Ahmed needs to come to the firm conclusion that his own father is an asshole. Please do not judge the kid for his father being an asshole.

    If his father has not apologized to him at least privately, his father is a flaming asshole.
    And some of the responses in this thread indicate the presence of flaming assholes as well.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
    1. Re:Leave the damned kid alone, go after the father by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      It saddens me to read all these arbitrarily constructed harsh judgements here, which NONE of you would ever apply to your OWN children.

      Quite. I get the impression from some people that unless he had a full set of ISO9001/2008 process, complete with engineering change notices, quality managed soucing of all circuit board mounts and an up to date revision history signed in duplicate, they'd piss on him for not being a "proper engineer".

      at 14.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  12. Riiiigggghhhhttttt by KenHansen · · Score: 2

    Ahmed Mohamed, the 14-year-old boy whose home-made clock got him arrested after school officials and the local police mistook it for a bomb last summer.

    Right - so convinced were the teachers and school administrators and police that:

    The teacher picked up the bomb and walked with it to the office,

    The administrators stood around the bomb and never evacuated the building,

    The police never sent the bomb squad to the school,

    just like happens everytime a suspected bomb is found in a school building.

    Ahmed was arrested because he refused to answer any questions about either his 'invention' or his intentions until the police took him in to custody.

    BTW, it's kind of interesting to note we're what, a year out and STILL the Dept. of Justice is still 'investigating' this case... What's the hold-up? They are only investigating an event that transpired over the course of 4 or 6 hours - how long can it take?