Slashdot Mirror


Cory Doctorow On What iPhone's Missing Headphone Jack Means For Music Industry (fastcompany.com)

Rumors of Apple's next iPhone missing a headphone jack have been swirling around for more than a year now. But a report from WSJ a few weeks ago, and another report from Bloomberg this week further cemented such possibility. We've talked about it here -- several times -- but now Cory Doctorow is shedding light on what this imminent change holds for the music industry. Reader harrymcc writes: Fast Company's Mark Sullivan talked about the switch with author and EFF adviser Cory Doctorow, who thinks it could lead to music companies leveraging DRM to exert more control over what consumers can do with their music.From the article:"If Apple creates a circumstance where the only way to get audio off its products is through an interface that is DRM-capable, they'd be heartbreakingly naive in assuming that this wouldn't give rise to demands for DRM," said Doctorow. If a consumer or some third-party tech company used the music in way the rights holders didn't like, the rights holders could invoke the anti-circumvention law written in Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Steve Jobs famously convinced the record industry to remove the DRM from music on iTunes; is there really any reason to believe the industry might suddenly become interested in DRM again if the iPhone audio goes all digital? "Yes -- for streaming audio services," Doctorow says. "I think it is inevitable that rights holder groups will try to prevent recording, retransmission, etc." Today it's easy to record streamed music from the analog headphone jack on the phone, and even to convert the stream back to digital and transmit it in real time to someone else. With a digital stream it might not be nearly so easy, or risk-free."Doctorow shares more on BoingBoing.

24 of 394 comments (clear)

  1. I can't hear you by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ultimately DRM boils down to even more labels not wanting their music to be heard. There's a simple answer to that, don't listen.

    If you don't want to produce good quality CD music uncompressed playable through an awesome amplifier to a standard pair of headphones without any bullshit circuitry in between, then by all means don't produce it. There's enough music in the world that we don't need to jump through hoops if we can't hear your stuff.

    1. Re:I can't hear you by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Informative
    2. Re:I can't hear you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes. Music is ridiculously, almost concerningly abundant. The other day I was struck with the realization that I've never actively pursued an album, illegally or otherwise.

      To be fair, I also realized I actively dislike 99% of music with lyrics. I'm quite content with the pile of... auxiliary music I have. Soundtracks, dumps, batches, stuff from video game music. Rhythm games usually contain plenty of music. Plucking out their audio and putting it on my phone probably runs afoul of some fine print somewhere, but whatever.

      Music just sticks itself on my hard drive, there's that much and it's that eager. I have a two hour audio track I don't entirely recognize, the filename suggests it was from some trance club event in Denmark in 2004. I have no idea where or when it came from, I don't remember when I acquired it.

      "Every second Youtube gets 17 seconds' worth of submission" or however the trivia goes. It'd be no surprise the music world is similarly flooded, and any illusion otherwise is a result of humans circulating 1% of it. I'm not even talking about indie noise, even our platinum stuff gets backseated after a while, with a Guitar Hero featurette being their future's best case scenario.

  2. What it means for consumers... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Paying $29 for another dongle.

    1. Re:What it means for consumers... by rainmouse · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Paying $29 for another dongle.

      ...or $3.99 on Amazon.

      And a patch that accidentally bricks your device when it's detected.

  3. Today it's easy by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Today it's easy to record streamed music from the analog headphone jack on the phone, and even to convert the stream back to digital and transmit it in real time to someone else.

    Unless they propose to beam music into my brain through a digital only chip then the analogue hole will ALWAYS exist on music. This isn't a monitor where the digital signal is the last easy point to intercept the signal. There aren't 2.3million individual points to accurately record and reproduce. There's just 2.

    If you have a signal that can move two magnetic transducers, I can trivially pump that signal into a recording device after any DRM takes place.
    But I won't, I'll simply copy the CD instead. Keep your locked down piece of crap.

  4. Idiotic Argument by macs4all · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, I guess Cory Doctorow has never heard of a Digital to Analog Converter (DAC), eh? Once a signal is converted back to analog (which it still has to be to be amplified and heard by us non-digitally-enabled humans), it is once more free for the taking.

    And unlike video, where you can play all sorts of games with resolution, etc, you can't decimate audio data nearly as much.

    Also, if this happens, there will be about 5,000 adapters to use analog earbuds/headphones with the data stream; and again, there's that pesky DAC... So, in reality, this is nothing more than a tempest in a DRM-free teapot.

    1. Re:Idiotic Argument by richieb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You missed the point of DRM. The stream of bits coming out of the iPhone can be encrypted and must be decrypted before the DAC can take place. The decryption keys will only exist in approved devices (speakers or headphones).

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    2. Re:Idiotic Argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Those Devices will need wires going to the part that makes sound, that part is the point you can install what ever you want to capture the signal. Its like pointing a cam at a movie screen sure, but its better.

  5. Re:Easy solution by macs4all · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't buy an iPhone.

    Or any other phone, starting next year.

  6. What it will really mean by Kohath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    - You need a small adapter for your regular headphones. This can get lost. So don't lose it.
    - They can fit a slightly bigger battery in the phone, so it will last slightly longer
    - The phone can be thinner.
    - Headphone port will no longer break if you yank the cord sideways. It will no longer get plugged up with pocket lint.
    - You can get noise cancelling headphones that are powered by your phone instead of a separate battery
    - Charging while listening remains a question? How can you do it? Wireless charging built in? Y-adapter?
    - Apple will sell bluetooth earbuds

    - People who want attention will complain and make up stories about DRM
    - Other people who want attention will complain and make up stories about headphone lock-in (even though there's an adapter for traditional headphones)
    - Other people who want attention will complain about the horror of paying $12 of an adapter when they just bought a $600 phone
    - Other people who want attention will complain because it's Apple and everything they do is bad
    - Other people will defend because it's Apple and everything they do is awesome

    - Next year, no one with any practicality will care that much because there's a $12 adapter for regular headphones.

    1. Re:What it will really mean by NotAPK · · Score: 4, Funny

      "It will no longer get plugged up with pocket lint."

      NotAPK's First Law of Pocket Lint: All openings in an object with a depth-to-width aspect ratio great than 1, if stored in a pocket, will fill up with pocket lint.

    2. Re:What it will really mean by geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not sure where you get 12$ for an adapter. I don't think Apple has ever sold an adapter that wasn't 29$. Plus, it's a fucking adapter. One more thing to carry/get lost/deal with.

      Apple is always bitching about simplification. One button mice, as few cords as possible, thinner etc etc. Then to use their shit you have to buy a gym bag full of fucking adapters for it to work with anything else. It's ridiculous.

      That said, those who don't like it can simply buy something else. For me though the problem is that I hate Google more than Apple and refuse to be either companies bitch. I really miss my old feature phone.

    3. Re:What it will really mean by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Interesting

      - You need a small adapter for your regular headphones. This can get lost. So don't lose it.

      Losing it isn't the problem. Not having it with you when you need it is the problem. If you only have one pair of headphones, that's fine. It's an unholy level of obnoxious if you think, "Oh, I'll plug my iPhone into my friend's stereo system to listen to a song," and your friend uses an Android phone and doesn't have the specialized adapter, because odds are approximately 100% that you won't have it with you.

      - They can fit a slightly bigger battery in the phone, so it will last slightly longer

      About two or three minutes, by my math. The headphone jack isn't very big, and doesn't stick that much farther into the device than a lightning port.

      - Headphone port will no longer break if you yank the cord sideways. It will no longer get plugged up with pocket lint.

      Lightning jacks get clogged at least as badly. And now, if you yank the cord sideways, not only will you break the port, but also you'll be unable to charge your phone. Oh, were you thinking about Bluetooth? Hope you like losing five seconds of audio every time you pause playback and restart it.

      - You can get noise cancelling headphones that are powered by your phone instead of a separate battery

      You can do that now. Nothing prevents headphone companies from building headphones with a Lightning connector. And they'll work all the way back to the iPhone 5.

      - Charging while listening remains a question? How can you do it? Wireless charging built in? Y-adapter?

      Two Lightning ports, I hope. Otherwise, this design is a disaster rivaled in the entire history of computing only by the current single-port MacBook.

      - Apple will sell bluetooth earbuds

      Which will suck because there's not enough space inside an earbud for a battery that will last longer than an hour or two under the best of circumstances. Apple will then insist that you need to grow bigger ears.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  7. not what i expect by eyenot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I heard that the iPhone was "missing" the headphone jack, my first thought was "good call".

    Here you have this insanely popular electronic device that people have with them at all times, and what's the number one complaint about it? No, no, /. friends, no, it's not planned obsolescence. It's "this thing dies if it so much as looks at water."

    Well if you're going to try to take care of that problem one thing you might go for right away is getting rid of that crazy big hole in the top that by its very nature of design is all about exposed metal contacts.

    I guess you could get all crazy in your head about DRM and shit but as someone else points out, at the end of the day however the sound is delivered it must end up being converted into a signal that can be used by standard speakers or headphones.

    The only way around that is if Apple plans on making it so you have only two options:
    * play the sound directly through the iPhone's built-in speaker
    * send the sound via some Apple-proprietary encrypted cousin of bluetooth to one of Apple's own special speaker systems that if they get large enough to entertain a party probably cost many thousands of dollars

    If that's the direction they're going to go I'd like to imagine it's going to be a complete failure because people don't have the money or wherewithal to spend on special speakers from Apple (the computer company, not the music company).

    But then again you only have to know a handful of Apple users to understand that they would do exactly that, and would be glad to go broke doing it.

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    1. Re:not what i expect by Kohath · · Score: 4, Funny

      The #1 complaint is "I saved $86 getting an Android phone instead, so Apple sucks balls".

    2. Re:not what i expect by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are devices with a headphone socket that is sealed and waterproof ... this is not usually the entry point for water on most devices ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    3. Re:not what i expect by danbob999 · · Score: 4, Informative

      many Android phones are doing just fine with both IP67 certification (underwater) and a 3.5mm jack.

  8. speakers will always be analog by kimvette · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Speakers will always be analog so the easy workaround would be to source "digital speakers" that utilise a single high quality full-range driver, snip the leads to the driver and hook up a LOC and record the analog level coming out of the LOC. There will always be an "analog hole" which can be used to bypass any and all DRM.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  9. A few weeks ago... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The media content industry wants to get rid of all analogue output jacks because an analogue jack cannot be locked down. .

    The media content industry has already done away with analogue video output jacks. Now they are focusing on audio.

    https://slashdot.org/comments....

  10. Re:Finally... by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's sad how people go off the deep end, and try to make everything about their personal crusade, like Cory has. People will be able to use headphone adapters, and even if that wasn't allowed, the signal can be intercepted at the earbuds.

  11. Re:Finally... by NatasRevol · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's literally ignoring that Apple was the only company to ever fight against DRM in their products. Every other company just said, well they're they rights holders, they can do that.

    http://www.computerworld.com/a...

    Warner Music CEO Edgar Bronfman yesterday rejected in no uncertain terms Apple Inc. CEO Steve Jobs' suggestion earlier this week that the major music label companies should abandon digital tunes copy protection.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  12. Re:Easy solution by tripleevenfall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've had 3 iphones in a row, going back to the first one.

    If the next one doesn't have a headphone jack, and there's an Android phone out there that does, I'll switch. I don't think I'm alone, either.

    There will be phones with headphone jacks out there because people want them. People want to be able to use any headset. People don't want to carry adapters around.

    It's a cash grab that delivers no additional value to users.

  13. Re:Easy solution by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There will be phones with headphone jacks out there because people want them.

    That's what they said about QWERTY keyboards on phones, and now look where we are.