Slashdot Mirror


The Rise and Fall of the Gopher Protocol (minnpost.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Tim Gihring at MinnPost talks to the creators of what was, briefly, the biggest thing in the internet, Gopher. Gopher, for those who don't know or have forgotten, was the original linked internet application, allowing you to change pages and servers easily, though a hierarchical menu system. It was quick, it was easy to use, and important for this day and age, it didn't have Flash.
The article remembers Tim Berners-Lee describing the idea of a worldwide web at a mid-March, 1992 meeting of the Internet Engineering Task Force, at a time when Gopher "was like the Web but more straightforward, and it was already working." Gopher became magnitudes more popular -- both MTV and the White House announced Gopher sites -- leading to GopherCons around the country. Just curious -- how many Slashdot readers today remember using Gopher?

225 comments

  1. Summer 1994, spain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our first manual was a book, the server lived in a digital server and the client to test and edit was a mac. We used gopher in the University of Navarre.

    1. Re: Summer 1994, spain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess we were in the same room then ;)

    2. Re: Summer 1994, spain by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      I believe those were NOT bragging points then. They still aren't, in case you haven't heard.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  2. Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by evanderburg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember Gopher well. It was the early nineties and I would peruse computer networking and programming topics but I also stumbled upon so many Dungeons and Dragons resources in my Gophering. I don't know if the age of the memory is tainted somehow but it seemed like Dungeons and Dragons players were big early adopters of the technology. I am interested in what other people found on Gopher. Maybe it will help me put my own experience with it in perspective.

    1. Re:Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Funny

      I didn't have general internet access yet, but one of the local BBSes had a gopher gateway. It seems like ASCII maps for AD&D2 was one of the things we downloaded.

    2. Re:Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but it seemed like Dungeons and Dragons players were big early adopters of the technology." - yes, it does involve computers!

    3. Re: Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by pele · · Score: 2

      There was an envirolink gopher site (somewhere at the cmu campus) with envirochat, it was a NUTS talker (no game just chat, like irc), used to spend a lot of time chatting to people from around the globe back then, it felt surreal. I then created and hosted my own but linked to from a web server (!), 94 I think it was. was a valid html tag back then, not sure about now.

    4. Re:Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I remember gopher well. Even in this age crappy Flash, gopher is really nothing to be nostalgic about it.

    5. Re:Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I also used it before Mosaic became the big thing on the net.

      A reason why Gopher died was as I understand it that there were some licensing issues surrounding it. And the search engine Veronica went in hand with Gopher if I remember right.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    6. Re: Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Archie! Along with gopher and veronica it was one of my main tools back into he day.

    7. Re: Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      <telnet> [you didn't escape < to &lt;] was a valid HTML tag

      I've never heard of that. How would it work? Telnet prompt in an iframe? Or maybe you mean telnet: was a valid URI protocol to link to, which of course it is.

    8. Re:Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by arth1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      gopher is really nothing to be nostalgic about it.

      Certainly not. I run a gopher server, serving up my e-books and readme's for my own software.

      Firefox dropped gopher:// support, but you can get it back with the Overbite plugin.

    9. Re:Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mosaic was *never* a big thing on the net. Netscape is what turned the www thing into reality.

    10. Re:Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by Fencepost · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, the Very Easy Rodent Oriented Network Index of Computer Archives did go along with Gopher.

      Also Archie (file directories for FTP servers, so you could find paths to the file you needed) and Jughead, another gopher search tool.

      For the old farts around here, the very earliest days of Yahoo when it was a heirarchical index rather than a search engine (or a white elephant) were similar to what you'd find in these.

      --
      fencepost
      just a little off
    11. Re: Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      What are you smoking. Mosaic was _the_ thing on the Internet. Until Netscape came along and created Navigator (using the same programmers). After Netscape Navigator, was born Mozilla Firefox.

    12. Re:Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Gopher, Veronica, Archie... good times when the 'net was less commercial. Of course, next you'll say either WAIS or ViolaWWW.

    13. Re: Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about a wart called Internet Explorer.

    14. Re: Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the old farts around here, the very earliest days of Yahoo when it was a heirarchical index rather than a search engine (or a white elephant) were similar to what you'd find in these.

      And lest we forget, Yahoo used to be Jerry Yang's list of all 42 http-accessible pr0n gifs and pcxs.

    15. Re:Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      I remember Gopher. I think I used in around 1990-91. I also remember using Usenet... alt.wesleycrusher.die.die.die It was neat to have an actual email address in 1990.

      In 1992, I picked up a paper pamphlet that described the idea of hypertext and the NCSA Mosaic browser. I read that the new protocol allowed individual words in paragraphs to become clickable links to entirely new pages. I distinctly remember thinking "holy shit! This is powerful". Having messed about with Gopher, I realized the limitations of Gopher's framework of folder navigation. Imagine if the New York Times used Gopher folders for its website. Click on the "Newest Stories" folder. Click on the International folder. Click on a story document. Then go back up. Gopher was cool because I could hop about around various networked computers. However, hypertext was so much more elegant and flexible in comparison.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    16. Re: Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh no. Dude I was there. Nobody used Mosiac except a few people at the university where it started. Most people used gopher and ftp until Netscape came out. Then the http thing took off.

    17. Re:Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Yup.
      Both the Public Library and the College Library BBSs had gateways to Gopher, and from there could find encyclopedias, news, anything. Helped with many a paper in high school when I couldn't physically get to the library.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    18. Re: Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Really? Because my introduction to the Web was on Mosaic, available in both my school computer labs and at the university where I did summer research. These were various unix boxen in physics labs, so that may be a pretty niche case, but still.

    19. Re: Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by gavron · · Score: 1

      Well that's really awesome that you did summer research at a university.
      Not only that, your exposure was "broken boxes" in "physics labs" so we know you
      were among geniuses.

      Unfortunately being around those broken boxes and not knowing your ass from which browser
      came first gives you any credibility to speak to anything being discussed.

      This would be ok if you were right. But you're not.

      Gopher was popular and abundant.
      Then came spyglass (later IE).
      Then came mosaic (later Mozilla).

      Happy reminiscing about how you rocked in the summer in a place that couldn't even run
      unix right (which having worked with physics postdocs I totally understand).

      E

    20. Re: Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you successfully demolished a whole bunch of things that I didn't say, while being exceptionally condescending. I guess the internet hasn't changed much since the mid-90's after all.

    21. Re:Gopher and Dungeons and Dragons by darrenadelaide · · Score: 1

      Sadly showing my age here, at 50 (last week), but remember gopher well too, kind of like an early yahoo but where the community really made life so much more informative and far far less junk (and basically no advertising) until the world "spoiled" it. When I wanted to know something I was able to find what I needed to know and was fairly confident (give or take) that what I found was reliable and accurate, and in less time that it would take now with my broadband connection @6mb/s than it was on a 300 and later a 1200 bps modem at the time.

      Started using bbs's at 12, old by todays standards but then it was about 15 being average, and from 15 on the early stages with AARNET (and later Senet one of the first commercial ISPs) and from there onward working as systems programmer & analyst when I started work at about 16, up until I had to retire (for health reasons) 2 years ago.

      I do miss the simpler times pre www (although I do like technology and how far it has come) but productivity wise we are no near near ahead as we should be.

      Who knows though with the way surveillance and intrusion into out privacy, maybe in 20 years time people will be talking more about .onion and how it was when http / https was around.

      Darren

      The more the world changes, the more it stays the same

  3. Yes, and maybe by hughbar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember it, at 65, actually I remember huge batch only mainframes. On a more serious note, I have a lot of time for Gopher, Lynx and all the 'simpifiers', I'd prefer everyone to have knowledge and communication at a low bandwidth rather than adverts, emojiis (whatever they are) and pictures of cats. My vision, going forward is goodbye port 80 and port 443, let's start again.

    --
    On y va, qui mal y pense!
    1. Re:Yes, and maybe by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      emojiis (whatever they are)

      I don't know when the first emojis were used, but I remember them in the early '90s. Emotion-icons, emoticons, were tags to express emotions over the emotionless text. ;) :P :O and others. They became single graphic icons about the time they changed names to emoji. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    2. Re:Yes, and maybe by telchine · · Score: 1

      I don't know when the first emojis were used, but I remember them in the early '90s. Emotion-icons, emoticons, were tags to express emotions over the emotionless text. ;)

      What you're describing are emoticons. AFAIK, emoji's originated later from cellphones in Asia; although they're clearly inspired by emoticons.

      With regards to the OP and his obsession with bandwidth, emojis use less bytes than a lot of emoticons...

      B========D~~~

    3. Re:Yes, and maybe by Daniel+Klugh · · Score: 2

      No, you remember kaomoji; which are the textual (ASCII, originally) "faces" that Japanese created. Emoji are the graphical icons. As I understand it, kaomoji are always faces (right-side up ones, at that!) where as emoticons and emoji can be anything. Also "emoji" is not a abreviation of "emotional ji" ("ji"="character"), as some might think. It's a combination of "e" and "moji", not "emo" and "ji".

      --
      Daniel Klugh
    4. Re:Yes, and maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      emojis use less bytes than a lot of emoticons...

      They do not, and I am surprised at your 6-digit UID. Emoticons are perhaps two bytes, like ;)

      Emoji's are not replacing the sending of images, they are (in one popular case), unicode transmission (1 to ... 4? bytes) of data, which (and I didn't check, but I'm fairly sure an emoji wouldn't have a one-byte representation) are automatically reconverted to pre-selected images. So emoticons can still take less space than emojis.

    5. Re:Yes, and maybe by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Usually just called smiley.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    6. Re:Yes, and maybe by hughbar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Whoosh! Please accept a hug from 'an ignorant old fuck'. I was funning, hey, I even know what 'Facebook' is. Remember too that you will be 'an ignorant (you're that already!) old fuck' someday unless you'd prefer to die before reaching that exalted state. Normally, I don't feed trolls, but today, on behalf of my decrepit sisters and brothers and polite people everywhere, I'm making an exception.

      --
      On y va, qui mal y pense!
    7. Re:Yes, and maybe by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I remember it, at 65, actually I remember huge batch only mainframes. On a more serious note, I have a lot of time for Gopher, Lynx and all the 'simpifiers', I'd prefer everyone to have knowledge and communication at a low bandwidth rather than adverts, emojiis (whatever they are) and pictures of cats. My vision, going forward is goodbye port 80 and port 443, let's start again.

      It was pretty amazing how useful and fast, even at 1200 baud, the Internet was back in the pre-graphics days. Gopher, Fetch, FTP, Whois an Usenet, and Lynx as a browser that focused on information, not self loading videos, animated ads, and other bandwidth and resource hogs.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    8. Re:Yes, and maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daniel is right to call them kaomoji. They were not smileys; they were sort of orthogonal to smiley construction (metaphorically and literally). Typically the faces were different to smileys in that the eyes were rendered horizontally not vertically.

    9. Re:Yes, and maybe by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's true. I even remember Nicholas Negroponte, at a CHI conference in the late 1980s, giving a talk about the future of high-speed network connections to the home -- he mentioned that fiber could gives speeds of more than a Gb/s, and went on to make the case (with a completely straight face) that no individual could ever use that much bandwidth.

      I suppose I can't give myself too much credit for laughing at the time -- I was thinking of the bandwidth necessary to ship high-resolution images at video framerates, without giving a thought to compression. But even that long ago, I knew that anybody saying "we'll never need more than X" of a computational resource was setting himself up to look very silly in the future.

      It's just a shame that so much of the demand for bandwidth (and computational power) is driven by the videos and ads we don't want.

    10. Re:Yes, and maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > dating heartbreak

      Well, at least I dodged that bullet!

    11. Re:Yes, and maybe by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      So you don't like kittens??

      You cruel heartless bastard! We have a term for you all. You are called Ed users. Even Vi users like Kittens, but maybe not cats

    12. Re:Yes, and maybe by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Also "emoji" is not a abreviation of "emotional ji" ("ji"="character"), as some might think. It's a combination of "e" and "moji", not "emo" and "ji".

      The word "emoticon" preceded "emoji" by more than a decade, and "emoji" became the winning term because it resembles the word "emoticon", while at the same time referencing e- (in both meanings) and moji.

    13. Re:Yes, and maybe by obsess5 · · Score: 1

      even at 1200 baud

      I remember, in 1995, a new employee telling me I was crazy for having gotten a 1200-baud modem for my Commodore 64, his reason being that nobody can type faster than a 300-baud modem can handle. Ahh, BBSs and QuantumLink, my memory of the former being of dialing an obsolete number and having the guy on the other end cursing about getting all these crank calls (I could hear him because the Commodore modems had a speaker), and my memory of the latter being that it was nerve-wrackingly slow (perhaps because of its semi-graphical UI)!

    14. Re:Yes, and maybe by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Still use Lynx at times, it is amazing how much more relaxing it can be at times for actually absorbing information. Slashdot actually works pretty well with it, but I mainly use it for untrusted websites

      As for Gopher, I think I used it to "stalk" a girl I met when visiting another college on a roadtrip in 1991/2. That was basically finding her email address...that and Finger... call it anti-social networking I guess.

    15. Re:Yes, and maybe by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer everyone to have knowledge and communication at a low bandwidth rather than ..*snip*.. pictures of cats.

      Can't we just have both?

    16. Re:Yes, and maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...rather than..and pictures of cats.

      Sorry, there were pictures of cats on gopher servers as well, I should know, I put some of them there and transferred quite a lot of them over to a web server circa '94...

    17. Re:Yes, and maybe by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      a new employee telling me I was crazy for having gotten a 1200-baud modem for my Commodore 64, his reason being that nobody can type faster than a 300-baud modem can handle

      Wow, but you can definitely read faster than a 300 baud modem can handle........maybe your coworker was a slow reader.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    18. Re:Yes, and maybe by jimbo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ugh, Finger. I had a girl sleeping over, her husband "fingered" her university account and saw her last login had been after midnight from my place.

      A lot of fingering happened that night. Next morning there was music to face.

    19. Re:Yes, and maybe by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      To me, emoji's were the graphical representation of emoticons that millennials seemed unable to process despite their 733t speak. The fact that you can type emoticons in most emoji enabled apps and get emoji's should tell you everything you need to know.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    20. Re:Yes, and maybe by Lije+Baley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No kidding, the days of Gopher were the peak of internet usefulness. Imagine what could have been achieved if images, videos, and the Army of Lamers had never come! The dystopia we got is now requiring us to watch 5 minutes of inarticulate video just to get information we could have skimmed in 15 seconds. And when there is no video, we have to get that same text spread across 3 pages full of ads that each take 15 seconds to load regardless of your ISP speed.

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    21. Re:Yes, and maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bah-dum tsss!

    22. Re:Yes, and maybe by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      No kidding, the days of Gopher were the peak of internet usefulness. Imagine what could have been achieved if images, videos, and the Army of Lamers had never come! The dystopia we got is now requiring us to watch 5 minutes of inarticulate video just to get information we could have skimmed in 15 seconds. And when there is no video, we have to get that same text spread across 3 pages full of ads that each take 15 seconds to load regardless of your ISP speed.

      I blame it on AOL for creating eternal September...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    23. Re:Yes, and maybe by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, kaomoji are always faces (right-side up ones, at that!) where as emoticons and emoji can be anything.

      The first emoticons were faces. The first emoji were faces. They expanded after that. That kaomoji didn't expand and gain popularity outside Japan doesn't diminish the start and original purpose of the others. Emoticon preceded kaomoji by a couple years, enough for someone to have seen it, adjust it, and had it gain a little popularity with the "enhancements". But the timeline is such that it looks clear that Emoticon was first, and the others are all derivative of it. Though the confusion of people who grew up with emoji who never heard emoticon using emoji to include all emoticon and kaomoji, such that someone who lived through it would be confused at the usage. :P

      Also "emoji" is not a abreviation of "emotional ji" ("ji"="character"), as some might think. It's a combination of "e" and "moji", not "emo" and "ji".

      Han-ji (kanji) is the Han character set. Roma-ji is the Roma(n) character set. So emo-ji would be the emo character set. It's possible it's both. The reason it caught on is that both e-moji and emo-ji made sense, perhaps one to one group of people more than the other, but they are both valid and consistent.

    24. Re: Yes, and maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too!

    25. Re:Yes, and maybe by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      ... It's just a shame that so much of the demand for bandwidth (and computational power) is driven by the videos and ads we don't want.

      You remember the old saying about beauracracies: "Work expands to fill the time alotted" ?

      Well, data load expands to fill the bandwidth available!

      It's a "law of nature". The only way to avoid waste of resources, it to charge for them by usage. So blame all of the "no limit" IP connections.

    26. Re:Yes, and maybe by ReeceTarbert · · Score: 1

      So you don't like kittens??

      You cruel heartless bastard! We have a term for you all. You are called Ed users.

      But... but... "Ed is the standard text editor:" when I use an editor, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless help screens and cursor positioning code! I just want an EDitor!! Not a “viitor”. Not a “emacsitor”. Those aren't even WORDS!!!! ED! ED! ED IS THE STANDARD!!!

      RT.

    27. Re:Yes, and maybe by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

      It was pretty amazing how useful and fast, even at 1200 baud, the Internet was back in the pre-graphics days. Gopher, Fetch, FTP, Whois an Usenet, and Lynx as a browser that focused on information, not self loading videos, animated ads, and other bandwidth and resource hogs.

      I suppose it depends on what you mean by "the Internet". 1200 bps was fine for dialing into an Internet-connected server, for interactive use (I wrote a fair bit of code in editors like vi, EDIT/TPU, and XEDIT at 1200 bps) or for downloading files that weren't too large.

      But if you actually wanted your machine to be on the Internet - to have an IP address and a route to the 'net - over, say, SLIP or PPP, you really wanted at least V.42, or something like one of the Telebit Trailblazer proprietary modes. Though UUCP was where the Telebits really shone, since they could do protocol spoofing and forward error correction.

      And even then, I remember distinctly upgrading my remote office from a Trailblazer link to a dedicated 56Kbit line, and it was so much nicer not having to wait for the link to come back up every time it idled out. And then a few years later moved up again to ISDN BRI, with a shockingly fast bonded pair of 64K bps links. Sometimes even ran X11 over that one. Of course it was a three-mile walk through the snow to the office every day, but we were happy.

  4. 1995 by vikingpower · · Score: 1, Insightful

    My first steps on the internet were divided between pages with hyperlinks, i.e. the internet as it is - more or less - nowadays, and gopher pages. Interestingly, I always failed to get the point of gopher, where "classical" hyperlinked pages made immediate sense to me. Same thing as with TCP/IP vs Token Ring: I instantaneously "got" TCP/IP, and only much later understood the point of Token Ring. So then - gopher: good riddance ? I guess so, yes. Along with set-top boxes, netscape, Flash, and VB script.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:1995 by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Gopher was closer to the first Yahoo, and some of the first national ISPs (that were gateways, and not ISPs as we know it today). Indexes, and less free-form. WWW was designed to allow more freedom.

      I lived through both, and both made sense to me.

    2. Re:1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the point of Token Ring

      Enlighten us.

    3. Re: 1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically what you are saying is:
      Gopher? I hardly knew her!

    4. Re:1995 by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Token Ring is what Sauron gave to the lady of that upstart race of fairies nobody wanted to know about. I think he found it in a box of cereal.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:1995 by Qbertino · · Score: 2, Informative

      "the point of Token Ring"

      Enlighten us.

      Slower than TCP/IP, but 100% deterministic network behaviour and speed.
      Basically it's what you want to run your Nuclear Power Plants, live-saving medical devices and bizarly expensive "failure is not an option" Space Equiment with.

      --
      We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    6. Re: 1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You keep comparing TCP/IP and Token Ring when they are different layers in the stack. Maybe you mean Ethernet rather than TCP/IP?

    7. Re:1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Same thing as with TCP/IP vs Token Ring

      They are not even on the same level. Token Ring is layer 2, and you can run TCP/IP over it, the same way you can run it over the various Ethernet protocols (wired or wireless).

    8. Re: 1995 by brasselv · · Score: 0

      mod AC as 'I know perfectly what you mean but there's no way I'll waste a chance to pedantically show I know protocols'

      --
      "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." (Oscar Wilde)
    9. Re:1995 by johnw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The point of Token Ring was to have plugs and sockets where it was impossible to put the plug in the wrong way around - or the right way around.

      And indeed, you could simply plug two plugs together.

      I used to do quite a few joint pitches with IBM sales-folk back then, and it was amusing to watch the show as they addressed the question of which networking hardware to go for. The plot was always the same. At early meetings they would say, "IBM sells both Ethernet and Token Ring and we recommend whichever is most appropriate for each customer. We'll need to learn more about your particular requirements before we can say which one is more suitable for you." Then, several meetings later when lots of things had been discussed, but nothing really relevant to the networking hardware the message would become, "Now we've had a chance to assess your particular requirements, we can say that for your particular case Token Ring would be better." It was always Token Ring, and never any explanation as to why.

      The real point of Token Ring was that IBM owned it and they didn't own Ethernet. It set out to solve a problem which didn't exist if you designed your network properly in the first place (overloaded Ethernet provides poor service to everyone) and introduced far more of its own. Like so many IBM technologies, it was a mess. Don't get me started on APPC.

    10. Re:1995 by johnw · · Score: 2

      Basically it's what you want to run your Nuclear Power Plants, live-saving medical devices and bizarly expensive "failure is not an option" Space Equiment with.

      The design intention was to produce something more reliable, but the implementation failed miserably. Those clunky connectors where you could never be quite sure that they'd mated correctly. Lost tokens resulting in periods of no connectivity. The fun game of going into your comms cupboard and unplugging each lead in turn from the MAU in order to plug in that magic reset gadget, which might then restore connectivity to your LAN. Token Ring was a train-wreck with an awful lot of money pushing it to big business.

    11. Re:1995 by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Slower than TCP/IP, but 100% deterministic network behaviour and speed.
      Basically it's what you want to run your Nuclear Power Plants, live-saving medical devices and bizarly expensive "failure is not an option" Space Equiment with.

      Slower than Ethernet (you can run TCP/IP over token ring) but 100% etc etc. The original advantage was that you could do it with no additional network hardware. The problem is that it never worked that well in that mode, so we got MAUs to implement a star-wired network, and CAUs ("cows") eventually came out with more advanced networking features. The problem is, by the time token ring was actually usable at a whopping 16 Mbps, ethernet was up to 100Mbps for less per NIC than 16 Mbps token cards, and you could afford to drop some packets on your network whether you were using TCP or not. Since nobody was using token rings in the classic fashion any more and just star-wiring all nodes through
      CAUs (if they could afford it) for reliability, the industry discovered that token ring no longer had any benefits and it died rapidly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:1995 by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      less free-form.

      www was not intrinsically better than gopher. It won out because there was more free porn accessible with it.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    13. Re:1995 by tburkhol · · Score: 1

      To be fair, ethernet went through the 10B-2 phase, which gave you all the disadvantages of TR, but let you use much less expensive wire and much less of it. I remember walking the length of the network at my first job, carrying a terminator, unplugging each device in series to figure out where the problem was.

    14. Re:1995 by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      > Same thing as with TCP/IP vs Token Ring

      They are not even on the same level. Token Ring is layer 2, and you can run TCP/IP over it, the same way you can run it over the various Ethernet protocols (wired or wireless).

      IPv4 and IPv6, so it's not "vs." in the sense of "using Token Ring rather than TCP/IP".

      So "I instantaneously "got" TCP/IP, and only much later understood the point of Token Ring" presumably means "I understood why you'd use TCP/IP on various networks, and only much later understood why you'd use Token Ring for a network segment (rather than, say, Ethernet)", so it's not quite the same as "HTTP vs. Gopher".

    15. Re:1995 by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget NICs that cost 300 to 600, most of which were micro channel (a ps2 only bus), and harder to find for ISA bus machines. Shielded thick ass cables that were impossible to manage, etc. Not the 10 base 2 was much better. Certainly cheaper. Oh and the broadcast storms on hub based 10 base T. Let's watch all the port lights go solid and hang.....

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    16. Re:1995 by johnw · · Score: 1

      10B-2 phase, which gave you all the disadvantages of TR

      I'd agree it gave you some, but never quite all.

      I remember walking the length of the network at my first job, carrying a terminator, unplugging each device in series to figure out where the problem was.

      True, but the terminators had the advantage that they were passive devices. Once you had a good set of cables and terminators, they then very seldom went wrong. The BNC connectors had a very positive latching action and you could be confident that they would stay together. You then just had to indoctrinate users with the idea that their hands would be chopped off if they unplugged any of them.

      TR on the other hand relied on very active components in the MAU, which had a high failure rate. That awful sound of an MAU continually clicking as it tried to remember how to do networking.

    17. Re:1995 by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Informative

      You realize that TCP/IP is a layer 3/4 protocol while token is a layer 1/2 protocol as such they have nothing to do with each other really. The first networks I installed were TCP/IP over token.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    18. Re:1995 by msauve · · Score: 4, Informative

      Token Ring ... "Slower than TCP/IP,"

      There's no basis for comparison between the two. Token Ring is a link layer technology (ISO Layer 2), and compares to Ethernet, not IP. IP will run on both.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    19. Re: 1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3C509 were abundant, and made for an ISA bus.

    20. Re: 1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, you're assuming the OP really isn't that clueless, and that they're just using the wrong terms.

    21. Re: 1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those were Ethernet, not Token Ring.

    22. Re:1995 by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, I always failed to get the point of gopher, where "classical" hyperlinked pages made immediate sense to me.

      Gopher was more about indexing the content than embedding links in the content itself.
      For some kinds of contents, gopher made quite a lot of sense.
      I still serve my e-book collection through gopher.

    23. Re:1995 by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Well, if you "got the point" of TR, you are one of a select few :)
      (I was at IBM when it launched and we knew then that it would not fly).
      Ethernet ultimately killed-off TR, AppleTalk and sundry others.

      Kinda like the IBM PS/2 and OS/2; in theory (and also in reality in many cases) far superior, but too expensive, too complex, too late, too "propitiatory/closed"

      But still, Bill Gates, Steve Jobs and Larry Asshole then took the IBM ball and ran with it....

    24. Re:1995 by mspohr · · Score: 2

      ARCNET
      Token ring was a ripoff of ARCNET which was the first token based network protocol. Widely adopted in the 80s.
      IBM needed to have their own proprietary network to sell to corporate types so they "invented" Token Ring.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    25. Re:1995 by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Well....maybe

      Take a look at this for a great "from the first principles" discussion on comms in nuc environments.

      http://www.itk.ntnu.no/fag/TTK...

    26. Re:1995 by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      The design intention was to produce something more reliable, but the implementation failed miserably.

      One of my employers used Token Ring quite extensively. A group within the company was building (or had built) a chip to implement a Token Ring NIC. The company was able to buy the complete Token Ring NICs at a good price, direct from the manufacturer (our customer for the chips).

      I don't recall it being anything less than very reliable.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    27. Re:1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But was there more free porn accessible on www because it was better?

    28. Re:1995 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Basically it's what you want to run your Nuclear Power Plants, live-saving medical devices and bizarly expensive "failure is not an option" Space Equiment with.

      Errrrrr nope.

      You don't run any kind of communications systems in such cases. All these are locally controlled, always have been, and hopefully always will be with communications systems giving external advice like setpoints and conditions only.

      In these scenarios you see ethernet. Lots of 10/100 ethernet, often fibre to provide galvanic isolation. But what you'll also see is that when someone unplugs the ethernet link the result will be verbal abuse from operators, not an immediate loss of control or unsafe scenario.

    29. Re:1995 by BLToday · · Score: 1

      less free-form.

      www was not intrinsically better than gopher. It won out because there was more free porn accessible with it.

      Wait, you're telling me people like looking at porn?

    30. Re: 1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won because you could have thumbnails of porn to browse.

    31. Re:1995 by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      "the point of Token Ring"

      Enlighten us.

      Slower than TCP/IP, but 100% deterministic network behaviour and speed.

      So how does it compare to TCP/IP over Token Ring? :-)

      Basically it's what you want to run your Nuclear Power Plants, live-saving medical devices and bizarly expensive "failure is not an option" Space Equiment with.

      So what protocols are run atop Token Ring in that case?

      (Or did you really mean "Slower than Ethernet, but 100% deterministic network behavior and speed"?)

    32. Re:1995 by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Now I'm giving thanks for never having to deal with TR personally..... BNC was bad enough. At least I only had to tap a thick cable once....

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    33. Re:1995 by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      My first steps on the internet were divided between pages with hyperlinks, i.e. the internet as it is - more or less - nowadays, and gopher pages. Interestingly, I always failed to get the point of gopher, where "classical" hyperlinked pages made immediate sense to me. Same thing as with TCP/IP vs Token Ring: I instantaneously "got" TCP/IP, and only much later understood the point of Token Ring. So then - gopher: good riddance ? I guess so, yes. Along with set-top boxes, netscape, Flash, and VB script.

      Your post is so full of stupid, I am at a loss where to to start unraveling it. There are gems of all kinds, there but I would point out the fundamental problem, apart your stupidity: you say you don't understand something, therefore good riddance. That's your entire argument - the fact that you are incapable to grasp a concept is reason enough to celebrate that concept's demise. That's a fundamentally bankrupt worldview.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    34. Re:1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really ... a Gopher link would access many files (text, graphics, sound ... whatever) that would open in different windows. And that rapidly got confusing.

      The self contained HTML page, incorporating text, graphics and whatever beat that hands down.

      That said, I do have fond memories of Gopher ... it was the first application to make me aware of the REAL possibilities of the Internet. (Incorporating multiple files in queries/hyperlinks and the embedding of 'hyperlinks' ... although they weren't called that, then ... in documents.)

      Before that it has been e-mail, news, and text ... after Gopher came Veronica, the Web and the network we have today.

    35. Re: 1995 by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      You keep comparing TCP/IP and Token Ring when they are different layers in the stack. Maybe you mean Ethernet rather than TCP/IP?

      That depends on whether it is important that you can run Tcp/IP over Token Ring, and have a system that does not shut down every time the load gets high.

      Token ring is like a train, everyone is the same speed but adding more cars does not usually cause a pileup, even in fog.

      Ethernet is like a Highway with separate cars, when it is lightly loaded it is great and much more flexible. But when more cars come on or even worse a sudden fog shows up, people die and the highway shuts down for a long time. (That's why DDOS attacks work...)

  5. lacked the versatility of hypertext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Gopher menus were like FTP directories with symbolic links to other servers. So lame Gopher was.

    1. Re:lacked the versatility of hypertext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially given that ZOG was a hyperlinked format in use about 10 years prior to gopher. We installed it on the Carl Vinson aircraft carrier around 1981. I looked at gopher when it came out but the real world was already beyond it.

  6. Stone age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I gave up using Gopher was still using monolithic App/TCP/IP on MS-DOS in 640KB of RAM (enough for anyone).

  7. When did the mother gopher die? by shanen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    University of Minnesota, wasn't it? I remember a story about the end of the last gopher server some years ago...

    I didn't actually use Gopher that much, though I knew about it. My main memory of Gopher was around 1995 when I was a research student again. I was interested in such search tools, and I remember searching on usenet for relevant groups. I was actually expecting a different one to be more important, though now I can't even remember what that system was called. However, what I actually noticed was that something called WWW seemed to be far hotter and more active than any of the systems I had heard of before that.

    The browser was the predecessor of Netscape that became Firefox, but I've also forgotten its name. What I remember was faking MathML with some version of Tex or LaTeX to create my equations as graphic objects so I could insert them into my first HTML webpages. Strange detail to remember after all these years, but the main hassle I remember overcoming was getting the background colors to be the same so that the graphic objects (equations) seemed to be part of the text.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:When did the mother gopher die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mosaic?

      we used gopher to find friends from high school at other colleges back in '94 when my school was still beta testing ppp access for students

    2. Re:When did the mother gopher die? by Llamalarity · · Score: 1

      2007? Downloaded the 2.7 GB "Full Gopher Archive from 2007" on April 30 2010. Pretty sure there was a story here at the time.

    3. Re:When did the mother gopher die? by ColaMan · · Score: 2

      The browser was the predecessor of Netscape that became Firefox

      NCSA Mosaic?

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    4. Re:When did the mother gopher die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Keep it aliiiive!

      magnet:?xt=urn:btih:8a253c3b71edc1df6b4ba98e105069f1fe9abdb9&dn=Full%20Gopher%20Archive%20from%202007

    5. Re:When did the mother gopher die? by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      The first browser I remember using in the early 1990's is Mosaic.

    6. Re:When did the mother gopher die? by Bearhouse · · Score: 2

      Yup, Mosaic.

      For along while, MS IE had credits to Mosaic on the splash screen....which seemed to take a long time to go away even with an overclocked 386DX

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    7. Re:When did the mother gopher die? by shess · · Score: 1

      I didn't actually use Gopher that much, though I knew about it. My main memory of Gopher was around 1995 when I was a research student again. I was interested in such search tools, and I remember searching on usenet for relevant groups. I was actually expecting a different one to be more important, though now I can't even remember what that system was called.

      Possibly WAIS and Z39.50.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    8. Re:When did the mother gopher die? by shanen · · Score: 1

      WAIS definitely rings a bell, but no recollection of Z39.

      However I was approaching the topic from the epistemological perspective even though I was supposed to be engineering electronic information at the time.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    9. Re:When did the mother gopher die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: "I was actually expecting a different one to be more important..."

      Perhaps you are thinking of Xanadu? Ted Nelson did a lot of work on this project and it had many of the features of the modern web. It has been years now but in the early days some thought Xanadu might take off.

  8. sigh by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the internet was not yet open for business. It had been built on dot-mil and dot-edu, on public funds. Programmers shared source code; if you needed something, someone gave it to you. A dot-com address was considered crass.

    The internet was better then.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:sigh by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The Internet was ours then, or at least it was the playground where we were top dog. Then clever nerds and businessmen ran with it and made billions, while ordinary people flocked to discover this new thing. That playground has grown to encompass the entire world, but our role in it hasn't grown with it, and we became largely irrelevant. The days of pioneering are over, it isn't ours anymore, and that's made some of us bitter. But I wouldn't call the old Internet better

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Id mod you up if I had any points, well said.

      If you wanted to 'be yours' again I can recommend joining a local community wireless network and if there isn't one create your own and join your friends and family. These days its easy to incorporate that and the world wide web into your local network and use both too.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    3. Re: sigh by brasselv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I enjoy the spirit of your post, but I would disagree that the days of 'pioneering' are over .
      from a broader historical perspective, the internet is still very young, there is still an enormous amount of stuff to be invented and figured out around it, we are still grappling to fully understand what it means to humanity, and from a business perspective its still a place where clever guys with some ideas and good luck can go from zero to a billion in a couple of years - which isn't the case in the steel industry.
      its still quite pioneers time to me.

      --
      "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." (Oscar Wilde)
    4. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't a community wireless network just a bunch of neighbors all piggybacking off each other?

      Why would I want to do that when I could buy a cheap burner hotspot instead and use it to connect to the internet for free until the SIM card expires for non-payment.

    5. Re: sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The days of technical pioneering are over. The technology has been invented and built and deployed. It's not changing rapidly like it used to.

      The opportunities that exist now are business opportunities for sleazy entrepreneurs to sell shit to idiots. Keep chasing those unicorns.

    6. Re: sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This, and more: the legislative framework has adapted. There will be more and more rules and regulations dictating what you can and cannot do, and the consequences for disobeying them will become more and more severe. State and economy have plunged their claws into the brain and heart of the internet. Now zombified, the once great hope for freedom is the supreme surveillance and repression tool. It's over.

    7. Re: sigh by wbr1 · · Score: 1
      Arguably we have gone from retail pioneering, or being the first over the mountains, to niche pioneering. When the idiotslooking for gold and land rush in we invent a new niche to hide in. We circle the wagons around our new new aggregation service or chat protocol. And then the idiots come, with the government not far behind. First a trickle, then a flood.

      Then us cynical old neckbeards run off to a new playground.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    8. Re: sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're running out of playground sandboxes that haven't been pissed in.

    9. Re: sigh by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      Retail=real. Silly phone

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    10. Re: sigh by brasselv · · Score: 1

      "The days of technical pioneering are over. The technology has been invented and built and deployed. It's not changing rapidly like it used to."

      until very recently, internet reached people through cables, now it reaches them through airwaves. we are in the middle of changing the very addressing system of the core protocol. we are embracing arguably the most significant update of HTML in decades. the face of user land if anything is changing even faster.

      of course, if you take historical RFCs and look at them framed on a wall, many are still perfectly valid and this can give you the impression that stuff is not changing so fast.

      But honestly, that's like not seeing any change in the transportation system since horse carriages, just because wheels are already invented and deployed.

      "The opportunities that exist now are business opportunities for sleazy entrepreneurs to sell shit to idiots. Keep chasing those unicorns."

      cheer up, some entrepreneurs are very sleazy, some are very clever and well intentioned, most are in the middle, all of them are human.

      --
      "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." (Oscar Wilde)
    11. Re:sigh by Lando · · Score: 1

      I'd also disagree with the statement that ordinary people flocked to discover this new thing. At the time of gopher, before the web, ordinary people didn't have any interest in the internet. While some of use were listing to radio over the thing, chatting in chat rooms and using newsgroups, most of the rest of the world was oblivious to the internet. It wasn't until 93 when the web was launched the ordinary people started to join the internet and it became eternal September. I don't remember when AOL started giving away their discs, but that was a major push to get people online as well.

      --
      /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    12. Re: sigh by brasselv · · Score: 1

      from the tone of your post it sounds you are, like me, old enough to remember the days when Usenet, around the time of the Great Renaming and the introduction of the new hierarchies, were flooded with "newbies".
      you probably remember old timers back then declaring that "the good ol days are over" and proclaiming the intention to go offline. the ones who did, have certainly missed a lot of fun.

      --
      "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." (Oscar Wilde)
    13. Re: sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All these moments will be lost in time. Like tearsmin rain.

    14. Re:sigh by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      Of course, porn was showing as hexadecimal dumps on our screens. That was the good old time.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    15. Re: sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Self reference?

    16. Re: sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      until very recently, internet reached people through cables, now it reaches them through airwaves.

      Which is funny, as Ethernet started as a wireless setup.

    17. Re: sigh by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      from the tone of your post it sounds you are, like me, old enough to remember the days when Usenet, around the time of the Great Renaming and the introduction of the new hierarchies, were flooded with "newbies".
      you probably remember old timers back then declaring that "the good ol days are over" and proclaiming the intention to go offline. the ones who did, have certainly missed a lot of fun.

      Yep, it was called the Eternal September and it was when AOL decided to unleash their horde of clueless idiots onto usenet.

      --

      Enigma

    18. Re:sigh by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      At the time of gopher, before the web, ordinary people didn't have any interest in the internet.

      How could they have? Ordinary people had no way to access the internet.

    19. Re:sigh by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The internet was better then.

      No easy universal search,
      No wikipedia,
      No super simple online purchases,
      No content that didn't come with an interest of the incredibly nerdy who were capable of running a website.

      No it wasn't "better". It was different. No ads, no tracking, no corporate interests looking to sell you to someone. But also, compared to now, no content. I don't miss the old internet, borderline useless crap that it was.

    20. Re:sigh by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. Maybe it was the rise of SEO that messed it up and made things impossible to find in the noise. Or maybe people actually like the noise.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    21. Re: sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was content.

    22. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though the underlying hardware is a done thing, if you want "yours", you can still get that and it's feel with encrypted anonymous overlay networks such as I2P, FreeNet, Tor, GnuNet, CJDNS, Phantom, TAHOE-LAFS, MaidSafe, CEFS, etc, etc, etc.
      I highly suggest you try them out, and make your own sites, sftp / gopher / nntp / shells etc on them.

    23. Re:sigh by Lando · · Score: 1

      There was public access to the internet starting in 1989. Gopher was created in 1991. Mosaic released in 1993. So people did have access in the time of gopher and before the web "launched". I was playing muds in 91 at the library, but there were several isp's available at the time growing out of the bbs era.

      --
      /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    24. Re:sigh by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The Internet was ours then, or at least it was the playground where we were top dog.

      The latter is spot on - someone else's property, someone else's equipment, paid for with someone else's money. You just played king of the hill on it and imagined yourselves rulers of all you surveyed.
       

      That playground has grown to encompass the entire world, but our role in it hasn't grown with it, and we became largely irrelevant.

      Your role hasn't expanded because you never had a role. You're asking for the equivalent of a management role at Exxon because some franchisee opened a gas station in what used to be the woods you played in as a kid.

    25. Re:sigh by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      To be fair to SEO, I remember a time when the internet was still devoid of content compared to know but websites had a shitload of hidden text on them to try and fool Altavista's crawler into driving more traffic towards it. The internet still improved a lot after the SEO craze started, and long before we smeared all pages with ad turds.

    26. Re: sigh by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      There was content.

      Yeah there were also people with more reading comprehension.

    27. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So people did have access in the time of gopher and before the web "launched". I was playing muds in 91 at the library, but there were several isp's available at the time growing out of the bbs era.

      Some people. For a lot of the people though, AOL/CompuServe/Prodigy was as close as they could get to the internet until the late '90s. My county didn't have any ISPs with local numbers until 1996 despite being close to New York City. And the BBSes were all ghost towns by 1994.

    28. Re:sigh by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and AltaVista became a wasteland of broken links as a result. Google was so great because it boosted the signal out of the noise, but eventually SEO techniques caught up.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    29. Re: sigh by Wintermute__ · · Score: 1

      No, it didn't. Bob Metcalfe and the boys at Xerox PARC invented Ethernet for networking computers together using coaxial cables, not wireless.

  9. Gopher was a stepping stone... by derinax · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I recall having a soaring conversation with a tech friend in a Seattle back-yard party about this rumored "new thing" that was going to revolutionize the world. It was like Gopher, but had the ability to transparently serve all types of media and links were network-agnostic.

    Frankly it blew my mind, and I had some difficulty wrapping my head around the concept, but most interestingly, we both found Gopher as the common-ground existing paradigm to compare against the nascent Web.

    Then I threw up in a bush, but I think that was the Jim Beam.

    1. Re:Gopher was a stepping stone... by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Gopher was a step up from searching FTP servers. Using Archie to locate files on various FTP servers was a pain. Most FTP clients were not GUI, so you had to list the directories, cd down into a directory, read the READ ME to find out what the directory was for, list the files to find what you were looking for. Gopher was specifically designed to provide menus so you could understand what files were available and what they were for. The web basically did the same thing, but now you could have more than a menu to choose from. Detailed descriptions and links could be on the same page. Later when you could embed pictures too, it really took off and the pages themselves became more important than the files they linked to.

    2. Re:Gopher was a stepping stone... by r0kk3rz · · Score: 1

      Something like IPFS? The concept isn't that complicated once you realise its mostly git and bittorrent mashed together to great benefit

    3. Re:Gopher was a stepping stone... by WillgasM · · Score: 1

      Seemingly long after Gopher, around the advent of Napster, I remember searching automated IRC channels for FTPs hosting new release VCD images. I spent so much time after school hogging the T1.

  10. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember gopher.
    That's about all I remember.
    First used the internet in 1992 or 1993.

    1. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Alzheimer, hunh? Is dementia being good to you?

  11. Limericks... by shanec · · Score: 1

    I remember picking up a magazine in the early 90's, and reading about the "Gopher Site of the Year." Which included, if one were to "walk" into the restroom in the tavern, the ability to read a limerick from my server.

    Ahhh....my 15 minutes a fame. When most everyone didn't even know what the Internet was yet.

  12. Gopher reminds me of freshman year... by emag · · Score: 1

    I fondly remember Gopher from 1993. Used it, loved it. Actually used it a *lot*.

    --
    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
  13. Gopher, Archie and Veronica... what a WAIS-land! by JasonNolan · · Score: 2

    I remember designing Gopher sites in grad school... and during the course I asked my prof if he'd mind if I did some WWW sites. That was 94 and we'd had Gopher, Archies and Veronica servers around, oh, and wais. Everyone should check out ED Krol's the Whole internet, if you can get the 1992 edition. It is a beautiful description of everything that was out there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369118X.2013.808365
  14. Lynx and Gopher sucked mostly by JosephDoeden · · Score: 1, Informative

    It was a cluttered messy experience. Seems to me ppl prefered to use BBS because you could get 'word' or pdf quality files.Basically, it was hard to read compared to even just very basic HTML. Telnet on the other hand was pretty cool and could do a lot, but was massively underused. Telnet could have been the flash of the day with full ASCII DIGITAL graphics, but instead of it was mostly a command line for boring shit other than a few server side games and apps.

    1. Re:Lynx and Gopher sucked mostly by Dogtanian · · Score: 2

      Lynx and Gopher sucked mostly [..] Telnet on the other hand was pretty cool and could do a lot, but was massively underused.

      I'm not sure that comparing Gopher and Telnet in that way is even meaningful. Perhaps I misunderstood the point you're trying to make, but the fact that you say Telnet "could do a lot" suggests you don't realise you're comparing apples with oranges.

      Telnet itself was little more than a text-based terminal facility for accessing remote systems; that's not a criticism, since this is what it was meant to do. Of course, you can provide pretty much any (text-based) facility you like over that connection- which I guess is why one might say you can do "a lot" with it- but telnet itself is still just a remote access facility for all that.

      Technically and functionally, it's not the same thing (nor intended to be the same) as Gopher, or the World Wide Web.

      If you added so much to it that it became anything plausibly akin to Flash, then I'm not sure it would be Telnet as we recognise it any more.

      (#) And Lynx was just a browser that happened to support both Gopher and the Web; it wasn't a protocol in itself. Unless you're referring to the unrelated modem protocol, in which case the comparison makes even less sense.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:Lynx and Gopher sucked mostly by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Seems to me ppl prefered to use BBS because you could get 'word' or pdf quality files.

      My, you're young.

  15. Re:Gopher, Archie and Veronica... what a WAIS-land by mccalli · · Score: 1

    My god - Veronica servers. I had completely forgotten them. WAIS also made it into academic courses and there were text/exam questions on what it was.

  16. Yeah, gopher and I go back a long time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now get off my lawn!

  17. I remember gopher by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    Mainly I remember it was often a pain getting to much of the information I wanted. The web was such a huge leap forward in terms of navigation - it's no wonder everyone quickly moved on from gopher.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I remember gopher by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Mainly I remember it was often a pain getting to much of the information I wanted. The web was such a huge leap forward in terms of navigation - it's no wonder everyone quickly moved on from gopher.

      Not really. How good a web-site is dependent on the web-site developer. What made the web useful are the search engines such as Google, Bing, Yahoo, etc. With Gopher or to put it other terms "A little burrowing animal" all you could do was follow links while today's search engine saved you the trouble of following links to present information in a form that is easier to get to a site of possible interest to you.

      Yes, Gopher was useful in its day but times change and much better solutions became available.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  18. Well, I was using gopher in 2016... by ewanm89 · · Score: 2

    Some gopher servers still exists, I was too young when the protocol first became popular, however I wanted to learn about it so loaded up a gopher client to see what was still out there a few years ago, decided to repeat that a couple of months ago.

  19. Gopher was more recreation than information by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    I used gopher on the university Macs. Not very intensive as the content was basically american centric, not sure how often I was using it.
    At the same time I was admin for a few Sun and Dec clusters in the university. There I was responsible for WAIS (Wide Area Information Services https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... -- btw. another great thing Apple was involved in when they where young) an other text based stuff, that felt more "normal" than clicking in a "browser".

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:Gopher was more recreation than information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      to be fair, the protocol originated in the u.s, and at the time the "internet" was also very much centered in the u.s.. so of course servers would be mainly concentrated in the u.s. and have "american centric" content.

      not only were you not in the u.s. you were using fucking macs in the early/mid 90s. you were lucky to get as much as you did.

      what gopher was, was the "web's" predecessor. and a boneheaded decision by uofm regents to try to get license fees for gopher is really what spurred the 'world wide web' as an alternative.. because the 'web' needs to be free...

      truth is, gopher was, and would today still be, faster, easier, and more content-focused than the manure floating to the top of the internet these days.

      but those were the days.. gopher, veronica, archie, trumpet.. back when they knew how to name stuff (GIMP obviously missed the memo back then)..

  20. Gopher was for porn by Skorpion · · Score: 2

    I got my first Internet porn from Gopher. I had no access to Usenet then, but one University offered access to Usenet through Gopher and that included alt.* hierarchy and specifically alt.sex.* hierarchy.

  21. It's still around, guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's still around. There's a small but passionate community surrounding gopher right now. A good portion of them are doing it to move away from the Web since it's become so commercialized and the technology is becoming so large and unwieldy that security is a real concern. Some make a gopher hole to mirror their website, or vice-versa. OverbiteFF is an extension you can use in Firefox to access gopher, or you can use a gopher-to-http tunnel or use lynx (not links or elinks). Lynx will even automatically use UTF-8 so you're not constrained to ASCII when you browse gopherspace.

    I've considered creating an anonymous BBS or forum for gopherspace. The input links in gopher are largely under utilized; a piece of software that used those to accept input and handled linking in a smart way could get a nice, trimmed-down forum that still had much of the features you'd come to expect from community software. The best part is it's pure text and its limitations prevent a lot of the bullshit that's been tacked onto the Web.

    That said, the community is super small and may remain that way due to its relative lack of maturity in server software. As far as I know, there are no packages/zip files/whatever that you can extract to a gopher-controlled directory and get an extra feature tacked onto your gopherhole. Until we get some fun projects like that, gopher will remain small. imo the best types of projects are those that abstract the server entirely and guide the user to manipulate the file-system, which falls in line with much of the content that gets served: often text files that you have a script generate a gopher index for as needed.

    The cool part is you aren't constrained to a language at all. Serving Python over the web, for example, can be a hassle. Hooking a language up for gopher just needs the ability to process stdin (if needed) and returned either plain-text or valid gopher indexes to stdout. You could probably even write a gopher script in Brainfuck if you cared enough :)

  22. Too easy .. by niks42 · · Score: 1

    Ask me a more difficult one, like

    "Do you remember using an acoustic coupler?"

    "Did you write the code for your final year project on an ASR33 teletype?"

    "Do you remember having to write the bootloader for the paper tape to the core memory, using the front panel switches of the computer?"

    "Remember when changing the font involved changing the golfball on the 2741 terminal?"

    1. Re:Too easy .. by sensei+moreh · · Score: 1

      I'm not senile yet; these are not difficult questions. The answer to each of them is, "yes."

      --
      Geology - it's not rocket science; it's rock science
    2. Re:Too easy .. by rgbatduke · · Score: 1

      Yes, to AC, but not often as they were SLOW... and modems started their upward track soon after.

      I used teletypes several times, but not to write full projects. Those were on punch cards. I wrote a full box of Fortran IV to do a large physics computation for Duke's nuclear lab. So back at ya, did you ever use HASP and JCL to manage 360/370 jobs submitted on cards, loading disk packs and so on? Again, teletypes AND cards sucked, so like all sane humans I switched first to tty consoles and then to the IBM PC, where I wrote an entire full screen editor that ran on TOP of the QED line editor in BASICA. I think I was probably the only human in the world at the time that could do full remote full screen editing on IBM mainframes... or at least, I never heard of anybody else who could.

      Sadly, I never WROTE a bootloader, but I did some work on a PDP-11 which booted from paper tape that somebody else wrote. Not that sadly, I might point out...

      I did write some code on paper tape, but that was back in high school, and only one program (one of my first programs, actually).

      Finally, I never changed fonts on a 2741 terminal. But I did write my dissertation on an IBM selectric and had to swap balls all the time to get the greek characters needed in a physics paper. Again, the IBM PC came out soon after with dot matrix printers, and I went through first T3 (if anybody remembers that, one of the first full screen math/text editors) and then TeX and never looked back after LaTeX.

      Things really did get better! There was -- and still is! -- home for the world....

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
    3. Re:Too easy .. by solarmon · · Score: 1

      Yes to all of those. I remember how much fun it was keeping all of my files on mag tape...

    4. Re:Too easy .. by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Ah, beat me to it!

      Also, do you remember knocking the box of punch cards off a desk and watching someone flip out?

      Do you remember core memory?

      Did you ever optimize code by laying instructions out on a magnetic drum so that the next needed instruction would be under the read head when needed?

      Did you ever use Karnaugh maps?

      Good times!

  23. Back in the day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup. I used gopher, along with archie, veronica and jughead. I had to subscribe to the Delphi dialup service since neither CompuServe nor GEnie offered access to the Internet. At the time, the Internet was not generally available outside universities.

  24. Bring back BBS's while we're at it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I did the whole BBS thing, AOL, and then figured out you don't need AOL to browse the internet. Gopher did not appeal to me, never touched it.

  25. NO! by Eric+Freyhart · · Score: 1

    I refuse to admit I know anything about the Gopher protocol, as it will state how old I actually am.

  26. Gopher client and sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Install https://sites.google.com/site/matjaz85/gopherclient for your gopher client and visit sites like gopher://sdf.org where you can find great System 7.5.3 macos floppies and other oldies :)

  27. Flash by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"It was quick, it was easy to use, and important for this day and age, it didn't have Flash."

    Flash? I never minded Flash. It was easy to disable. And with extensions, it was easy to delay or remove objects too. Restrict animated GIF, and life was good for many years.

    Now with all the Javascript animation, it is impossible to limit or stop useless and annoying animation that is incorporated into just about every website and all over it. And I am not talking ads.

    Some of us desperately want browsers to add some type of animation limitation or control.... if it is even possible.

    1. Re:Flash by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      Now with all the Javascript animation, it is impossible to limit or stop useless and annoying animation that is incorporated into just about every website and all over it. And I am not talking ads.

      Some of us desperately want browsers to add some type of animation limitation or control.... if it is even possible.

      FlashBlock and NoScript on Firefox do a pretty good job of that.

    2. Re:Flash by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Bingo! I much preferred it *before* Google started moving all their annoying animated ads to HTML5. Primarily because I was running Flashblock- i.e. click-to-play- and didn't have to see them if I didn't want to (which- spoiler ahead- I didn't!)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  28. I loved gopher... by rgbatduke · · Score: 1

    It was more a file sharing protocol. No html, but it was very easy to link resources of many sorts into a library a notch above FTP in ease of use. Oak Ridge, IIRC, had an awesome gopher site where one could get many tools and goodies.

    --
    Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
  29. not that significant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember gopher. I used it barely at all for less than a year long after I had been emailing and MUDding and on BBSs and briefly before I started using the web.

  30. I knew about Gopher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked for a consulting firm that studied the use of technology in K-12 education. My boss who was rather technically challenged and got rather nervous when confronted with a keyboard knew about the topic and would talk up Gopher a lot. I only used it a few times, however. However, if I recall correctly the first web server I installed was free, made by IBM and it was a dual Gopher/HTTP server.

  31. Re:Gopher, Archie and Veronica... what a WAIS-land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I liked Archie and Veronica better than Gopher but I still couldn't find a listing of all the 2 letter internet country codes for my boss using any of 'em. It was at a CSU library that was trying to setup the net beyond the couple computers they had in the lab.

    The net was exciting and amazing back then.

  32. Ah, Gopher . . . I remember it well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, definitely remember Gopher. And Usenet. Then the WWW hit it big.

  33. Free Internet through the BBS' Gopher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My parents wouldn't pay for Internet access back in the mid-90s, so I had to use a local BBS with an Internet gateway, the Freenet. They had a gopher to access everything. I could access all sorts of information directly through it, including connecting to the local library's system. I got mail through Pine and Usenet through Tin. There was Archie and Wais. They even had Lynx. I did all this over a 1200bps modem and I thought it was great. I spent hours in Tin, especially after I found out how to Telnet in from the school computer lab. I loved the gopher because navigation was easy. I could just hit the number of the item I wanted and go directly there. I memorized how to get to the features I used the most by typing a few numbers. I was angry when they replaced it with a web-based interface and switched to using Lynx for everything. All the things I used before were still there, but navigation through menus on a text-based web browser is much more difficult. The couple of keystrokes that I could memorize and type quickly turned into watching the screen carefully as I pressed arrow keys over and over. Fortunately, it wasn't long until my parents started paying for an actual PPP-based Internet connection so I could use Netscape.

  34. MN kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in high school when the satellite campus (Morris) of U of MN got gopher in probably early 1992. It was AWESOME.

    By the time I got out of college it was already fading fast but there was still a ton of resources on there that you couldn't find through the web.

    As a side note, I was always impressed at how cutting edge Morris, a small campus of maybe 2k students, was. Even now I think Jim Hall (the creator of FreeDOS) is their IT director.

    1. Re:MN kid by lindner · · Score: 1

      Does Morris still do summer courses for high school kids? I did that twice in 1986/87 which led to my U enrollment (and eventually a spot on the Gopher team).

      The computer course was taught on their PDP-11. My first exposure to Unix and C. I made a little curses-based skiing game.

      Also had a SciFi/Fantasy course. We spent most of it playing D&D.

  35. U of Pisa by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    87 comments and not a single mention of University of Pisa in Italy and their large collection of <ahem> photos? For shame...

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    1. Re:U of Pisa by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      87 comments and not a single mention of University of Pisa in Italy and their large collection of <ahem> photos?

      "My God... is that a leaning tower?"

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  36. Um, yah - Gopher, Lynx... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Delphi... The WELL, CompuServe, MCIMail, acoustical couplers.. biting the bullet on a 56K modem purchase... and still answering headscratchers from the HVAC guys about all the 1mA current loop cabling they claim leads to nowhere...

  37. Gopher was my introduction to the Internet by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Back in college, Gopher was my first introduction to the Internet. I remember excitedly clicking from link to link, amazed at the information at my fingertips. Then, I got to a link titled "Middle East" and suddenly got worried that I would get in trouble for incurring long distance charges for my college. I closed it down and left.

    The next time I went to the computer lab, I had a better understanding how networking worked (and why there wouldn't be long distance charges no matter what link I clicked on) and explored Gopher further.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  38. Gopher wasn't that original by Improv · · Score: 1

    I remember it, and it was pretty cool at the time. It had predecessors though - France had a system called Minitel that dates back to the year when I was born (1978).

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  39. Took a long time for http to be better by caseih · · Score: 1

    Our university had a admission system and the library catalog that ran on gopher systems combined with telnet applications. It took many years before their new web-based systems were as good as the gopher ones were. In fact for a long time they ran the web site and the gopher server for the library catalog and the gopher side was faster and better for a long time.

    The main university gopher site was running for many years after the web took over. I think it was just forgotten about. It finally went away when they upgraded their web servers back in 2004 time frame.

  40. Used gopher in 1994/1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Internet first became available to our town in the summer of 1994. We bought "Internet In a Box" which included a gopher client, the mosaic web browser, email client, ftp client, etc. At that time the web (mosaic browser) seemed like the primary thing to spend my time on the Internet. I tried gopher a few times but it didn't seem very appealing or useful to me compared to the web.

    Does anyone remember WAIS?

  41. The Gopher Hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ah, Gopherspace.
    Back before the web, when the internet was just green text on a black screen. Back when knowing UNIX was the barrier to entry onto the net.
    Way back when.... my internet connection consisted of a Z-29 dumb terminal that I had bought from the local university for ten dollars, and a 300 baud US Robotics modem plugged in via a home-made serial cable. I had a shell account on a server belonging to a friend who lived across the country. All I needed was a way to get there.
    The local university had an internet dial-up, but it was password protected.
    However, when you called in, they gave you a choice - press 1 to input a password and access the internet, or press 2 to access the library's brand new gopherspace-based card catalog system.
    By accessing the card catalog, I was in. From inside gopherspace, I could head out of the university system and into other linked pages on other systems. And one of these pages consisted of a list of locations one could telnet into, half of which of which were dead. I figured someone had put the page in and forgotten all about it. No upkeep, no maintenance. No pruning of dead connections. And now it was my backdoor.
    By selecting one of the dead links, it would cause the gopher client to crash out to a raw telnet prompt. And once I had an open telnet, I could head straight for my shell account on my friend's server, for email, USENET, or accessing any one of the various MUCKs or MUDs out there. (for those of you too young to know what those acronyms mean, picture Second Life, but text only.)
    I exploited that hole for a good many years... sneaking onto the net to hang out with a small crowd of like-minded freaks, geeks and weirdos.
    Everybody sing along.. THOSE WERE THE DAAAAAAAAAYS.

  42. Coincidentally by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    Just yesterday some friends and I were talking about how much we miss Gopher. It had some useful advantages that nothing has replaced.

  43. A few years before my time... by brando56894 · · Score: 1

    My family got our first PC in 94-95 and we had AOL, and the beginnings of the WWW. I had heard about gopher but never got to use it.

  44. Gopher this .. by michaelamerz · · Score: 1

    I remember a friend came into the Linux cave (current Linux was version was 0.9x) and asked me if I knew WWW. It's like gopher he said - only with images. So - yes - I know gopher. Looking back all those years - I wonder: Is that the Internet we all envisioned? I actually grew up without the Internet - learned "online" with commercial packet-switched networks that charged by the packet sent or received (though not me - we had .. ways) - got involved with free software, entangled in Linux and finally built an interactive web based online service that was used by half a million users. Completely without javascript, php, python or even an apache web server. Whatever you needed back in the late 90s - most of the stuff you had to program yourself. No yum this or apt get that. Most of my former colleagues and friends have dropped out of the rat race. They lost contact with the fast pace of the change of systems, services or programming languages. And you can hear my occasional rant about how it was all better 20 years ago. I guess we changed the world back then. But the new generation of hackers deserves the chance to change the world again - to their liking. But between us: We shaped the Internet, created the web environment and voice over ip, we challenged the foundation of the music industry with our mp3, we were the people that made what it is known today as "the Internet" - it's a tough act to follow. I sure hope that "systemd" is not the yard stick to measure our successors contributions to the digital world.

  45. Surfin' the Internet with Gopher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to have this image above my desk:

    http://professional-geek.net/personal/images/misc/gopher.png

  46. Gopher was sooooo much better at the time... by phoophy · · Score: 1

    Gopher was cool because it was way easier to follow references to other content on other sites than FTP, even if you often had to download the content and figure out which app was needed to display it. Xgopher was cooler yet because it could display images. Then Mosaic showed up, and had the ability to handle many more data types, and the fuse was lit... In the early 90s, everyone who knew anything about the 'Net knew where the main gophers were. Opened up communications a lot, and was far more direct than Usenet, which had already descended into being mostly noise by then. Great way to share information, 'til there was a greater one.

  47. Missed Gopher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I missed Gopher completely. Usenet, LISTSERV, Archie, FTP, then to the WWW. First I even became aware of Gopher was when I realized the local university was completely missing the WWW revolution (to the point of letting www. get assigned to a random department) and spent all its energy on its Gopher server. I guess the lack of a popular Gopher client (unlike WWW, with Mosaic & its successors) contributed greatly to the loss of Gopher.

  48. I'm all right nobody worry about me. by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

    Gopher was okay, but I guess someone had the idea to add images and html was there within months it seemed. I like the internet we have now apart from the massive spying and viruses. Games are more advanced, and if you like older games, you can still play them. Wanna listen to some Bob Marley? Youtube is there.

  49. 386 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember Gopher - also Archie and Veronica.

  50. Never found anything cool by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    I am not say that there wasn't anything cool, but that nobody I knew (all geeks) showed me something on Gopher that made me say "cool". Then I saw these guys looking at a dilbert cartoon on some browser thingy and I was sold.

  51. At UMinn by jbolden · · Score: 0

    UMinn was the center for gopher. I remember when the WWW came out I figured that built in indexing (think the Yahoo of the 1990s) was more important than graphics and Gopher would remain the dominant platform. Some school loyalty but mostly one of the worst predictions of my life. Gopher was quite good. The web would be a more educated place today had it remained gopher / nnews. But porn and advertising were too much for good content to beat.

  52. Oh Veronica by ChadSmith4920 · · Score: 1

    Veronica was the Googles for Gopher sites. Used it on my 286 slip connection back in 93.

  53. Article riddled with errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. No easy way to search FTP sites? Of course there was - Archie Search Engine for FTP. Veronica was the search engine for Gopher

    2. WAIS was another search engine for Internet.

    3. No companies on the Internet at that time? Not true - there were plenty of companies on the Internet like Allied Chemical etc.

    4. Gopher can't do graphics? Of course it can. In fact Mosaic supports the gopher protocol and can display HTML web pages with graphics using the gopher protocol. You can do the same thing with FTP by the way.

    5. What ultimately killed Gopher was its licensing fees. There was an active effort kill gopher by the outraged Internet community after that. The same thing happened when Unisys tried to charge licensing fees for GIF which resulted in the creation of the PNG format.

    6. Mosaic was initially only available for Unix systems. Microsoft Windows didn't even have a TCP/IP stack. You had to install Trumpet Winsock to connect a PC to the Internet.

    7. Nothing prevents you from doing text based browsing today like gopher. You can construct web pages to look like gopgher pages and there are plenty of text based browsers like e-links.

  54. Gopher was my second step/ by supabeast! · · Score: 1

    Gopher was how I expanded out on the internet beyond paying crazy fees to send internet email over Compuserv. A few local bulletin boards offered access. I was in high school, so I didn’t have anybody around to tell me what the point of Gopher was, so it was like browsing a very nerdy newsstand. Today I often miss Gopher, because it had no images, no video, no Flash, no insane page layouts trying to sell me clickbait.

  55. Gopher Blue by DadLeopard · · Score: 1

    Gopher Blue was the main one I used back then, even remember having to run a program to convert the 7bit ascii stream back to 8bit binary after receiving it from there! They had a large repository of AtariST utility programs! All part of running a Citadel BBS for the AtariST community in my area! I got access through our local university's dial-up system. Going from 300baud to 1200baud was a real treat back then!

  56. ASK A QUESTION STORY AGAIN ----FBI FBI FBI FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you have people immediately answer in first posts. Your site is gay now.

  57. Been there done that by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Gopher was the first "search" thing I used when I got plugged into the "net".

  58. I would go back to my 2400 baud modem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the internet would go back to pure html. It was better I paid 9.00 a month for no ads and now I pay 49.99 for bandwidth that is more ads than substance.
    I am ready to go back gui less.

    1. Re:I would go back to my 2400 baud modem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      text only gopher-like services would run very well over Tor or I2P. Where bandwidth is so low it's not likely to catch anyone's attention, and latency is high but not such a big deal for Gopher.

      I'm writing a gopher client for CP/M-80. Usable over serial or ESP8266 (preferred). Next up is to support IPv6 using uIP and SLIP, but even with 56KB TPA (free memory) on my system, it is going to be tough to fit everything for a good solid Gopher. I only support ADM-3A terminals, and I do not support VT100. It would not be hard to add VT100 (or VT52), but easier to start with the most common low-end case.

  59. still have one bookmark... by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    I still have one gopher site bookmarked, although it's been dead for a while (and modern browsers no longer recognize "gopher://" as a valid URI prefix). I simply haven't got the heart to delete it. Of course, even at the time I added it, gopher was nearly dead as a protocol in general. I mostly only added it because I was astounded that I'd stumbled across a still-running site, and that my browser, at the time, could still talk to it.

    This story was simply posted to gather evidence confirming the fact that slashdot is full of old pharts, yes? :)

    1. Re:still have one bookmark... by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Yes, we are old farts. Our first accounts were just terminal sessions via modems. Teleport.com, Connected.com, Wolfe.net. Lynx and gopher were the way I spent hours. My wife and I actually met via talk(1) on the regional ISP. That lead later to moving to Seattle for us to both work for that ISP. We hosted images.slashdot.org when Rob's T1 became saturated. That was on an old Pent 90 with 256MB of RAM running Slackware. We were the big dogs in the Seattle ISP world back then because we had a whole T3 from Sprint (45Mb/s) and almost 500 modems.

      I just noticed the other day that my domain is over 20 years old, I should have had a party.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  60. I hardly.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gopher?! I hardly know her..

  61. How many remember...? by bscott · · Score: 1

    > how many Slashdot readers today remember using Gopher?

    If you're too young to remember Gopher, what are you doing on Slashdot in the first place?

    --
    Perfectly Normal Industries
  62. i remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, I remember that when I got my first connection in 1996 gopher was already deprecated. that's all I remember

  63. internet purchase by mcswell · · Score: 1

    I remember my first Internet purchase, in 1986. Well, it was sort of an internet purchase, and I can't remember whether it was called the Internet then, or the Arpanet. There was a usenet group called forsale.something, and it had subgroups for different parts of the country. One day I saw an ad from someone nearby selling a used portable dishwasher. I made contact, and I think I went to his house to complete the purchase (Amazon didn't ship across the country back then, and you really didn't want to send your credit card number by email).

    We used the dishwasher for several years, took it to Colombia with us, and eventually sold it down there for at least as much as we had paid + shipping.

    Of course I was far from the only one to do this sort of thing--that's why forsale.whatever existed.

  64. Did Internet training in 1993 and Gopher was "it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah the fond memories of Gopher in 1993. Did Internet training for public schools for teachers to use the Internet. Had it broken down into subjects, Telnet, Gopher, FTP, WAIS, Usenet, Email, and this new 'WWW' thing.. :) We had a huge 'at the time' 1.5MB T-1 line serving our campus and racks of modems for teachers. 33.6K. Remember covering that Gopher was developed at the Univ. of Minnesota and was a menu driven link to servers all over the world. A decade later Microsoft purchased a POS content management systems called Sharepoint. My first thought when I saw it was 'hey this is like Gopher, except it's far worse'. :)

  65. My Go To Resource by cprasky · · Score: 1

    I remember Gopher well. It was my go to resource for everything on the 'net from new software to travel weather reports. I kind of miss it.

    --
    The optimist proclaims we live in the best of all possible worlds and the pessimist fears this may be true.
  66. One day a co-student came by treczoks · · Score: 1

    and told me about this new program, Arena, which was "a kind of gopher, but with hypertexts". It was horribly slow, but it worked, and it was a miracle!

  67. The AOL of Usenet by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

    I never once saw it advertised despite being online since before the Internet was a thing. In the summer of '95 I taught public school teachers how to use the Internet as a part of a summer program and the instructions we gave included how to use Gopher but I never saw it used outside of school. It was on all of the school computers and the limited computer instruction given to students included an introduction to Gopher but no one ever bothered with it. Usenet, IRC, even BBSes were more popular. Basically, the lack of pr0n and warez were its downfall.

    --
    -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
  68. I used it, barely by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    I even remember TurboGopher, a mac client with some 3d modiling, for no reaon other than "hey lets make these virtual things into 3d models"

    It got killed like a lot of things got killed - something better came out, and at the same time people misused the gopher: protocol to DoS effect. Netscape pulled gopher: support in Navigator because of that abuse, and the nail was in the coffin.

  69. The story is revisionist history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I commented on Reddit about this story. It's hagiography at its worst. They completely ignore how gopher was actually killed long before ads and porn when UMinn changed it's MIT/BSD type of license to a license that specifically excluded free use by any .com domain user (whether they were actually commercial or not, and regardless of the fact they were providing free content). It was this license change that soured gopher to the one group on the internet then that had the money and resources to invest in gopher or web. Because of the UMinn license gaffe, .com people abandoned gopher en masse and switch to the command-line WWW based on HTML instead. It turns out it was the right decision because of the power of HTML compared to the "FTP-like text interface" of gopher.

  70. gopher was too newfangled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I remember gopher. It was a new unnecessary protocol that did little more than what FTP did, except did it 15 years later. I rarely used it, because ftp was easier being more familiar, and then http became more widespread.

  71. Still Alive!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://gopher.floodgap.com/gopher/gw?a=gopher%3A%2F%2Fsdf.org

    You can get an account at sdf.org and still have your very own gopher space.

    And DuckDuckGo has a !bang for !gopher to search the gopher space.

  72. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember Gopher.

  73. Got lost in Gopher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sat down at a university library computer and opened Gopher to do some research. I found links to another university and followed them for more information. Those links led me to other links. After a while, all of the pages started to seem to repeat themselves. Then I figured out that the links were sending me through the same few university sites and I had been going in circles for 3 or 4 cycles.

  74. Gopher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG are there really this many of us old farts still on-line?

  75. nasa gopher 1993 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was on high-school at the school computer facilities . All was text based in a telnet terminal on windows 3.. and felt like magic . still the Internet feels like magic but with ads . The real internet not social media and gossip sites

  76. Duh Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Raising hand. I remember Gopher. This should tell you that I'm not a rocket scientist. I remember thinking 'WWW who needs all that crap? Pictures and graphics? Color text? Pfft. Give me a command prompt line any day over that rubbish."

    I also distinctly recall getting a "gut feeling" that I should check out the availability of certain very common domain names. I even priced a few of them. Then I passed. Duh me. I really didn't think this www crap would ever amount to anything significant.

  77. Memories by Kazin · · Score: 1

    Hah, I used gopher and Veronica in college on an IBM mainframe via Kermit. In many ways I'm glad those days are done.

  78. Hytelnet by tmh+-+The+Mad+Hacker · · Score: 1

    I never found much on gopher (but never looked too hard) but came across hytelnet and used that quite a bit for a while.