Slashdot Mirror


Snowden Speculates Leak of NSA Spying Tools Is Tied To Russian DNC Hack (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Two former employees of the National Security Agency -- including exiled whistleblower Edward Snowden -- are speculating that Monday's leak of what are now confirmed to be advanced hacking tools belonging to the U.S. government is connected to the separate high-profile hacks and subsequent leaks of two Democratic groups. Private security firms brought in to investigate the breach of the Democratic National Committee and a separate hack of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee have said that the software left behind implicates hackers tied to the Russian government. U.S. intelligence officials have privately said they, too, have high confidence of Russian government involvement. Both Snowden and Dave Aitel, an offensive security expert who spent six years as an NSA security scientist, are speculating that Monday's leak by a group calling itself Shadow Brokers is in response to growing tensions between the U.S. and Russia over the hacks on the Democratic groups. As this post was being prepared, researchers with Kaspersky Lab confirmed that the tools belong to Equation Group, one of the most sophisticated hacking groups they've ever investigated. "Why did they do it?" Snowden wrote in a series of tweets early Tuesday morning. "No one knows, but I suspect this is more diplomacy than intelligence, related to the escalation around the DNC hack." In a brief post of his own, Aitel agreed that Russia is the most likely suspect behind both the Democratic hacks and the leaking of the NSA spying tools. He also said the NSA data was likely obtained by someone with physical access to an NSA secure area who managed to walk out with a USB stick loaded with secrets.

133 comments

  1. Ok by sexconker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    K, thanks for the speculation.

    1. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You want speculation. It's speculated that Hillary had sex with Satan himself and gave birth to Trump via c-section performed by aliens.

    2. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why is no one talking about this?

    3. Re:Ok by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 2

      By aliens, you say? No wonder he wants Mexico to pay.

    4. Re:Ok by Grog6 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's being hushed up by the Trump-Alien-Russian-Clinton Conspiracy''s Tight grasp on the Media's Scrotum(s).

      Their collective polygrip is just too strong.

      Inform your congresscritter, go door to door if you have to; this evil conspiracy must be exposed!!!

      I'm voting the safe vote; Opus and Bill. No, not the blue dress bill.

      --
      Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    5. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This a thousand times!

    6. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary had sex with Satan himself and gave birth to Trump via c-section performed by aliens.

      OMG! I suspected she was evil, but this totally confirms it!

    7. Re:Ok by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Opus and Bill

      Alas, I think that one's a bit old even for most of the people who hang around here. Just haven't gotten into the new version as much. Like Calvin and Hobbes or To Kill a Mockingbird, sometimes you just produce perfection, once, and stop.

    8. Re:Ok by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

      You want speculation. It's speculated that Hillary had sex with Satan himself and gave birth to Trump via c-section performed by aliens.

      Why does this make so much more sense than either Hillary or Trump?

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    9. Re:Ok by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Polygrip? Genious!

      Just ran out of points or you would get some funny.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    10. Re:Ok by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      Damn I miss the Weekly World News.

    11. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya, I don't get why people think snowden is some super-genius, he's just a temp who essentially violated an NDA.

    12. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I do remember Bloom County...

    13. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He evaded the NSA and US intelligence services for weeks.

      He might not be a bona fide genius, but he's definitely not in the same category as José the Temp.

  2. STOP!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then hang by the nuts until dead!

  3. Honey-pot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and propaganda prepared by the U.S. Don't touch those tools if you're in this sort of business, because you are the one who will be hacked.

    1. Re:Honey-pot by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      It really depends on what was lost. It could have just been a set tools used via some US advertising front or bespoke computer entry tools that evade detection left on a computer system in the wild during random US gov/mil surveillance.
      The US set up a home, front company and bought in a series of computers with a prosumer or commercial optical link to the outside world.
      For that surveillance task, that site was going to be their collection point. All gov documents would show is a rented home or a dot com advertising or new economy engineering start up.
      Someone notice the command and control and ip, looked in and walked away with tool set.
      Police forces use the same methods everyday to cover their total control of chatroom, forums, sites. Any ip will be traced back to an expected home, small business, rented site on a business estate.
      This time the other agency surveillance team found in the wild was a bit more interesting...
      Would the direct use now be trackable by the NSA, GCHQ, other 5 eye nations? Yes

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Honey-pot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, but if I understood correctly, what is for sale is the source of the tools too. The fronts you describe would have the tools, but I doubt they would have the source too.

      Or am I wrong?

    3. Re:Honey-pot by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the tool set comes a package as an app the code as part the bespoke contractor tool set sold/rented to the NSA?
      So a server found in the wild would have both a binary, exploits, debugging and code it in some folder for use or better obfuscation or alteration in the field..
      i.e. binaries with help, options settings.. versions to cover updates or unexpected changes days or months later, without needing a secure connection back to the mil/gov to fix things in the wild. The code could be altered as needed by the front company. i.e. mid mission the site is the end point for all communications..
      This could have been a team of contractors, work left over with another nation..ex staff, former staff, dual citizens walked out and tried it for their other country.. and it went a bit wrong.
      i.e. someone saw something and tracked back the stream of data exiting a system under US or UK watch.
      Some other options:
      Someone induced US automated gov malware to react, infect a network and tracked the NSA interest in their computer back to a US gov/mil commercial fronted site.
      The new buddy system failed epically and some mil/gov site used for some collection project was left wide open, tools exposed to the wild for a short time..
      An insider walked out and needs to keep the upgraded counter surveillance teams guessing.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Honey-pot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a typo in your signature by the way. It's "they're", not "the're"

  4. Re:Hijacked 1st post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except, you lost your frosty piss ... the webz wins you.

  5. HAHAHAHAHA OK thanks FBI BurEAU HeaD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice one. Got it. No problems now.

    Roger that.

  6. NO NO NO FBI, HE DEFECTED .. NOT EXILED. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >exiled whistleblower Edward Snowden

    You give yourselves away... you're giving yourselves away...

    When you find someone in trouble
    And you don't know what to say
    The best thing you can do for them
    Is to give yourself away

    Lend a hand to lift the broken
    Let your heart break when God's heart breaks
    Speak up for those who have no voice
    And give yourself away

    Give yourself away, be the hands and feet of Jesus
    Give yourself away, go out and make a world of difference
    Let this be the day you see how far that His love reaches
    The greatest sacrifice of all is to give yourself away
    Yes, it is

    Jesus saw us in our suffering, He saw the debt that sin had made
    And on that cruel and fateful cross He gave himself away
    Jesus knew what love would cost Him, a price that only He could pay
    And though they ridiculed and spat on Him, He gave Himself away

    1. Re:NO NO NO FBI, HE DEFECTED .. NOT EXILED. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give yourself away, be the hands and feet of Jesus
      Give yourself away, go out and make a world of difference
      Let this be the day you see how far that His love reaches
      The greatest sacrifice of all is to give yourself away

      The greatest sacrifice of all is to give yourself away

      So don't hold back, don't hold on for someone else to come along
      The time is now, it's up to us to go out and prove His love
      There's a hurting world that's dying for someone to come and love them
      The only way to truly live is to give yourself away

    2. Re:NO NO NO FBI, HE DEFECTED .. NOT EXILED. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give yourself away, be the hands and feet of Jesus
      Give yourself away, go out and make a world of difference
      Let this be the day you see how far that His love reaches
      The greatest sacrifice of all is to give yourself away

      Give yourself away, be the hands and feet of Jesus
      Give yourself away, go out and make a world of difference
      Let this be the day you see how far that His love reaches
      The greatest sacrifice of all is to give yourself away
      The greatest sacrifice of all is to give yourself away

      Give yourself away, give yourself away
      Go out and make a world of difference
      Give yourself away, give yourself away

    3. Re:NO NO NO FBI, HE DEFECTED .. NOT EXILED. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      "Exiled" is perfectly applicable. Quit trying to assign your own made-up meanings to words and you'll be much happier.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  7. THE AMERICAN PUBLIC DIDN'T WANT HIM GONE EITHER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the US government employees did. Why? They are ripping off and murdering Americans.

  8. Conclusions so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think it's clear that the West's thinking that Russia (and others) are less advanced as they are in computer-technology (as I dislike the wording of 'cyber'), is offset by reality by quite a bit. Reality, it seems, is that Russia is a peer at it. China is, surely, too. Popular politicians and their methods of communications are decennia behind the capabilities of even simple computercriminals. We have to wait for leaks to open up the mistakes of non-popular power-yielding individuals. But surely this will happen too. Meanwhile a crackdown on freedom and democracy in the form of forbidding encryption is for sure going to happen.

    So now what? Edward, you tell us. Clearly, the opensource community has no idea.

    1. Re:Conclusions so far by maharvey · · Score: 1

      What a surprise, since we've been outsourcing our software engineering work to both those nations.

    2. Re:Conclusions so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With or without the outsourcing would this have happened. Maybe without a bit later than with. So what?

      On a less technical, higher level: a corrupt government and/or a government filled with corrupt people will see its corruption leaked. Constantly. There is no long term escaping human ingenuity. Technology is going so fast, and so is the computercriminality-scene, that everything must be considered short-term. If a powerhouse like the US can't cope with that: so be it.

      Short and medium-term we will probably loose the legality of encryption in the process. We won't loose it. In fact, making it illegal will increase the research in the field. I think. Long term it will also increase the use. Short term it will destroy it. Long term: humans want privacy. Psychologically. Fighting this, will backfire big time.

    3. Re:Conclusions so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey look, we found someone who actually fell for the "russia did it" line!

  9. Do Americans actually realize what just happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't see much media coverage about the NSA hacking tools being put for sale. If they really belong to TAO, this is probably the most advanced and dangerous hack in history. It's like if somebody penetrated into the cyber equivalent of Area 51, and stole the cyber equivalent of a flying saucer! Basically now every NSA attack will be easily fingerprinted and blocked. I'm afraid people aren't exactly realizing how bad it is for the US government cyberoffensive capabilities: they've been basically wiped out.

    Aren't NYT, WaPo, HuffPo (if they still publish something not about Trump), etc... interested in that? Obviously Trump's wife's tits are FAR MORE IMPORTANT, but besides those, maybe some media coverage about this hack would be appropriate.

  10. Russian DNC hack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't see him saying that. But thanks for inserting that narrative.

  11. Re:Do Americans actually realize what just happene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, relax. Even with Area51 exposed was and where nuclear bomb tests going to proceed. Cyber is so ingrained in the elite of the US that Cyber bomb tests are and will proceed.

    Flying saucer or not.

    Teh peoplez who think they are intelligent, decided. It will happen. Stupid or not. No matter the money.

  12. It's time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last week I saw a report where Snowden tweeted an innocuous message..."It's time". Now this happens. What connections are there I wonder.

  13. FORGET ANYTHING SNOWDEN/TWITTER TIED IN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTS:
    "Why did they do it?" Snowden wrote in a series of tweets early Tuesday morning. "No one knows, but I suspect this is more diplomacy than intelligence, related to the escalation around the DNC hack."

    Ed is in Russia, he does not communicate with America over Twitter. The US Government control Twitter.

    Forget all bullshit about Ed Snowden on Twitter. He is not trying to sway anybody in America from Russia right now.

    You fucked up again FBI slashdot.

    1. Re:FORGET ANYTHING SNOWDEN/TWITTER TIED IN by Maritz · · Score: 1

      You fucked up again FBI slashdot.

      LOL. That bit was good.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  14. Re: Do Americans actually realize what just happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically now every NSA attack will be easily fingerprinted and blocked.

    Yep, that's exactly how these things work. You must be very well educated in infosec.

  15. Re:Do Americans actually realize what just happene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking of the FBI

    They do have many photos of Trump, and his wife, naked.

  16. Motivating America's real enemies! by shanen · · Score: 1, Troll

    Weird that my draft committed suicide as I attempted to reply... Reminds me of http://www.huffingtonpost.com/... in some ways...

    Anyway, the introduction to my comment is that I don't like or dislike Hillary, but she is clearly well qualified to be president and the Donald is clearly fundamentally not qualified. The HuffPo piece is just one more angle on why not.

    Therefore I believe that a Trump victory would be quite similar to a decapitation strike. Insofar as America has real enemies including Putin and Daesh, they would obviously be motivated to do anything they can to help Trump win. Hacking the DNC is one angle, but I'm more concerned about a major terrorist strike timed just before the election. America's enemies may be crazy, but they aren't stupid.

    Cue the crazy trolls. Actually, I'm not convinced all of Trump's trolls are crazy. Even the ones that seem to be sincere might be faking it, like Trump himself. Actually makes more sense to me that some of them are paid to fake it (perhaps by Putin and his fiends). (Apologies to Rocky and Bullwinkle, eh?)

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Motivating America's real enemies! by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually makes more sense to me that some of them are paid to fake it (perhaps by Putin and his fiends).

      But Hillary actually is paying people to pretend to support her online. Look up "Correct the Record."

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    2. Re:Motivating America's real enemies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is official!!! a shill bot has emerged. Of course it might be a regular shill that is unable to pass a turing test. to be on the safe side you have been tagged, move along.

    3. Re:Motivating America's real enemies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... might be faking it, like Trump himself ...

      He's not faking it. The problem is Republican candidates who spout "greed is good" also see the rest of the world as servants. Such candidates discover that their proclamation "I/God said so" is no longer feared and their political groupies demand a material, if somewhat illogical, reason for their decision. Such treason is perplexing to candidates ordained by a silver spoon and few can adjust their life perspective before election day.

      I was hoping for Trump; after all, the USA survived the stupidity of Reagan and Bush junior. Thus, the only damage from his presidency would be concentrated on the electoral system; a beneficial outcome. I expected Trump to learn some tact like Reagan did but Trump insists on acting like the 11 year-old bully he always was. When he is harassed about his failed businesses in the upcoming months, I foresee a massive tantrum.

    4. Re:Motivating America's real enemies! by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      No, she's paying people who want $8/hour to copy and paste from a script to harass her political opponents online. It's basically ruined political discourse on the internet. Starting the day after her latest $6 million cash infusion to CTR reddit became unusable for political discussion. Non-stop spamming of /r/politics with pro-Hillary/anti-Trump articles from day-old accounts that upvote each other and downvote/harass anyone who disagrees with them.

      Why do you hate America, freedom, and democracy?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    5. Re:Motivating America's real enemies! by shanen · · Score: 1

      Where's the positive defense of the Donald? Of course it won't matter after America has been decapitated, will it?

      Okay, we know there is nothing positive you can say about Trump, so you have to change the subject and repeat tired old lies.

      So who do you hate most?

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    6. Re:Motivating America's real enemies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She is "clearly qualified" to be president? Clinton herself has acknowledge she made mistakes when setting up her insecure e-mail server in order to hide her activities from the government and FOIA requests. Why would you think she is qualified to be president when she has shown supremely bad judgement and put US security at risk?

    7. Re:Motivating America's real enemies! by shanen · · Score: 1

      No, my OP was not a troll post, just an observation, but from the troll responses, a question does occur to me. Kind of an indirect effect of the Trump trolls trying to change the topic away from Trump's incompetence, and even though I know that wasn't their intention.

      Given Trump's track record, he certainly could have learned from his many mistakes (such as his six bankruptcies), but as far as I can recall, he never admits to a mistake and never apologizes. Can't learn by blaming other people for your mistakes or projecting your personal flaws onto your enemies. Therefore the obvious question is whether that's just a marketing ploy (to protect "the brand") or if the Donald sincerely believes he is perfect?

      I would say that it is impossible for him to be sincere, but that could be projection. After all, my father wasn't extremely rich and I didn't have any sort of sheltered upbringing. I got to learn about my personal imperfections from the git go. Not sure how much I've actually learned from them, however... I can certainly point at a number of mistakes that I've learned from.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    8. Re:Motivating America's real enemies! by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      The positive defense of Donald is BUILD WALL DEPORT ILLEGALS BAN MUSLIMS BOMB ISIS BEAT CHINA LAW AND ORDER. These are all good ideas.

      There's nothing good to be said about Clinton.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    9. Re:Motivating America's real enemies! by shanen · · Score: 1

      If that was a travesty of a Trump supporter, it certainly captured the incoherence.

      If that was an actual Trump supporter, it certainly captured the incoherence.

      I guess Hillary wins the last point by default, but as I said in the OP, I'm basically neutral towards her. However I'm beginning to like her for her excellent taste in enemies. I rather wish the American political system weren't so biased in favor of lawyers, but we could do much worse in the Donald's case.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    10. Re:Motivating America's real enemies! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      No, my OP was not a troll post,

      Yes, it was.. just can't tell if it's shtick or if it's for real, but it's definitely troll.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    11. Re:Motivating America's real enemies! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Evidence? I've seen so much crap posted about Clinton that I discount it automatically.

      Also, "ruined political discourse on the internet"? What internet are you connecting in from? On the one I hang out on, having a large group of people spamming the party line is called "Tuesday", if not one of the six alternate names.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    12. Re:Motivating America's real enemies! by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      http://www.thedailybeast.com/a...

      You can also just google "Hillary Clinton correct the record."

      You have to admit it's kind of a new beast to have a political candidate paying people to spam and insult voters who disagree with her. You have no idea on reddit if you're talking to someone with a genuine difference of opinion with whom you can try to find common ground, or if it's a political operative paid to make fallacious arguments and shit up the site so honest discussions can't take place.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    13. Re:Motivating America's real enemies! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I still don't see the difference between this and the internet at large. There's hordes of anti-Clinton people who I'm not going to find common ground with, since I keep asking for evidence, and I don't think it matter whether they're being paid or not. However, thanks for the information.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    14. Re:Motivating America's real enemies! by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      The difference is you're talking to a paid political operative pretending to be another regular voter with a different opinion. No political argument you have with this person is going to "change his mind" because he's not even necessarily arguing a point he believes in. He's just there to harass you and waste your time.

      How useable would Slashdot be for discussion of open source projects if Microsoft paid shills to troll for MS and against Linux and moderate everyone they don't like to -1? Eventually wouldn't you just...leave? That's /r/politics on reddit now. It was never great but you used to be able to have an occasionally reasonable discussion with someone. Now it's non-stop anti-Trump posts from sub-two-week-old accounts and "HAHA DRUMPF'S HITLER" comments upvoted and any attempt at reasonable discussion downvoted into oblivion.

      As an old-timey conservative I don't think I've ever advocated for a new law in my life (I'm pretty much always on the "we have too many as it is" side) but there's one I want after this cycle. In the US every TV/radio ad or mailer or whatever has to have a line that says what candidate or political group paid for the ad. I would like all paid comments by political organizations to have to be tagged with "this comment paid for by WTFever PAC..." so they can be filtered out, or at least so people know they're talking to a glorified bot instead of a real person.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  17. That's dumb and unrealistic by mveloso · · Score: 1

    Why would you want the US/NSA to know that you've compromised them? That's stupid. It's more likely that the NSA is selling its own fingerprinted tools as an opportunity...or someone taking advantage of the current climate to take some suckers for a ride.

  18. They hacked the DNC, and ... by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... they got copies of hacking tools used by the NSA. Are the two related?

    If so, why did the DNC have NSA hacking tools?

    If not, what is the reason for tying the stories together?

    1. Re:They hacked the DNC, and ... by ichthus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not only that, but neither one of these hacks have been confirmed to have originated from Russia. Last I read, the NSA hackers were American, and Julian Assange implied that the DNC hack was just a simple inside job. Seems like a forced (and potentially false) narrative is being pushed.

      --
      sig: sauer
    2. Re:They hacked the DNC, and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's like the cold war again, anything stinks blame the commies. Just never mention the fascists boring holes through one end of the constitution and out the other.

    3. Re:They hacked the DNC, and ... by gcswt · · Score: 2

      It seems to me to be a political play to publicly play the Russia card. I really doubt these professional hackers would hack ONE political candidate for President. They all would be ripe targets and arguably, Clinton would be the most difficult - tho most prized. I really think Russia is a red herring as well, especially with how much is "leaking" out into the news.

    4. Re:They hacked the DNC, and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... they got copies of hacking tools used by the NSA. Are the two related?

      If so, why did the DNC have NSA hacking tools?

      If not, what is the reason for tying the stories together?

      Unlikely the DNC had NSA spying tools. Perhaps the reverse is more true. By connected he might be implying that guccifer got DNC data from hacking the NSA, or that they got into the DNC through the NSA. Seems more likely that the NSA would have DNC data than the other way, doesnt it?

    5. Re:They hacked the DNC, and ... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      One of the criticisms of the NSA creating these tools was that they were bound to leak eventually. Like Struxnet where eventually others got hold of it and adapted it for their own purposes, to use against the US.

      On top of that, we know that the NSA is leaky. Snowden proves it. And no organization is unhackable. So if forensic analysis of this malware shows that it uses stolen NSA tech, it would be quite significant.

      But yeah, it's a bit early to speculate.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:They hacked the DNC, and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gives a shit what Julian Assange thinks or says or even Snowden for that matter? Snowden is stuck in Russia and Assange lives in a closet in the Ecuadorian embassy. Why should any pay any attention to these two rock star wannabes?

    7. Re:They hacked the DNC, and ... by ichthus · · Score: 1

      You took the time to type three sentences and click submit. Yet, you added nothing to the conversation.

      Why should we listen to them? Because they have credibility. They have yet to be proven false, unlike the media and the DNC, who they've colluded with.

      --
      sig: sauer
  19. Re:Neocon shills by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0, Troll

    How are you so sure it isn't the NeoCommunists in the DNC doing this? the GOP wasn't hacked, Hillary's campaign was Hacked (and likely her home brew server as well) but .. yeah it has to be the NEOCONS and the VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY!

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  20. Re: Do Americans actually realize what just happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's right, IDS signatures for firewalls will now be updated, and the leaked exploits will become useless. Your irony is purely idiotic, you're the one who needs IT education.

  21. Re:Do Americans actually realize what just happene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They do have many photos of Trump . . . naked.

    Thanks, I just threw up in my mouth.

  22. Last week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...was immediately followed by this week.

    Coincidence? I think not!

  23. "exiled whistleblower Edward Snowden" by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    What? "Exile" isn't even a thing (any more).

    He's "Avoiding prosecution Edward Snowden." In the days when exile was a thing, it was a punishment. Just like jail, or death, or a fine. You know, the sort of thing that comes after a trial. He's not an exile, he's a fugitive.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:"exiled whistleblower Edward Snowden" by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      "Exiled" can also simply mean, "No longer living in one's homeland and disinclined to go back." It's not necessarily a thing that is done *to* someone.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:"exiled whistleblower Edward Snowden" by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      "Exiled" can also simply mean, "No longer living in one's homeland and disinclined to go back." It's not necessarily a thing that is done *to* someone.

      Usually such a person would be referred to as an "expatriot." The connotations are very different.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:"exiled whistleblower Edward Snowden" by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Turns out the definition of 'exiile' isn't down to you. Weird, but apparently true.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  24. Challenge for the experts by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Weird that my draft committed suicide as I attempted to reply... Reminds me of http://www.huffingtonpost.com/... in some ways...

    Anyway, the introduction to my comment is that I don't like or dislike Hillary, but she is clearly well qualified to be president and the Donald is clearly fundamentally not qualified. The HuffPo piece is just one more angle on why not.

    Therefore I believe that a Trump victory would be quite similar to a decapitation strike. Insofar as America has real enemies including Putin and Daesh, they would obviously be motivated to do anything they can to help Trump win. Hacking the DNC is one angle, but I'm more concerned about a major terrorist strike timed just before the election. America's enemies may be crazy, but they aren't stupid.

    Cue the crazy trolls. Actually, I'm not convinced all of Trump's trolls are crazy. Even the ones that seem to be sincere might be faking it, like Trump himself. Actually makes more sense to me that some of them are paid to fake it (perhaps by Putin and his fiends). (Apologies to Rocky and Bullwinkle, eh?)

    Right before posting, I always <ctrl>-A/<ctrl>-C to grab a copy of the text. That way if the system hiccups, I can open a local text file and save the text while I straighten things out. Has saved my bacon bunch of times.

    On your point about Hillary being qualified, and not trying to provoke an emotional response, I took the trouble to research Hillary's decisions and accomplishments over the last 16 years.

    And came up empty.

    There's not a single moment that I could find, no decision or action or award, that Hillary can point to with pride and say "I did this!". The best I can come up with is that she was elected as senator.

    Since you think she's qualified, can you help me out by justifying that a bit? I mean... is there *anything* you can point to that forms the basis of your opinion?

    I don't mean "she's not Trump", either. I could just as well vote for the Green or Libertarian candidate, and they're also not Trump.

    What has she actually *done* that merits your support?

    (Note that I'm trying not to be trollish, and I haven't thrown any insults. Please keep that in mind when responding.)

    1. Re:Challenge for the experts by shanen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, but you are posting in a profoundly ignorant way, or you are completely distorting the meaning of "decisions", "accomplishments", and "empty". True, I haven't always agreed with the things that Hillary has done, but mostly I have agreed with her objectives and been saddened in those cases when she was prevented from succeeding. One obvious example would have been healthcare reform back in the 90s, when she didn't even have a real job. However, her greatest and most obvious accomplishment was cleaning up a small part of the international mess left behind by Dubya and the big dick Cheney. Of course in that area she obviously could have done much more if the so-called Republicans weren't pledged to President Obama's failure from day one of his presidency, and by extension to the failure of every part of the federal government under his control.

      That's as polite as I can get. You didn't actually say anything in response to the substance of my comment, so now I get to repeat the question: "Why do you want to decapitate America?"

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    2. Re:Challenge for the experts by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      However, her greatest and most obvious accomplishment was cleaning up a small part of the international mess left behind by Dubya and the big dick Cheney.

      That's a bit vague, isn't it? What actual tangible acts and outcomes are you referring to?

    3. Re:Challenge for the experts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HTH

    4. Re:Challenge for the experts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I ask you the same thing?? Have you ever thought of Voting for Jill Stein, very intelligent savvy. A person w/ leadership skills, unlike the two sheeple that keeps getting promoted by the Hallitocic amoeboids w/ their shillbot fanbase.
      And that is as polite as I get.

      ("Warning, people are raging chemical bags being bounced around by random hormone surges, to get coherent thought from them is rarer than unicorn horns")

    5. Re:Challenge for the experts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but "Posting in a profoundly ignorant way" is not an argument; it is a statement of how you perceive his reply to you. If you are empirically-minded at all in your "support" of Hillary's track record (rather than the person), I would encourage you to pick up and read Doug Henwood's My Turn, in which he explored the same question in somewhat longer form. Once you're done, you might also consider picking up Tom Frank's Listen, Liberal, which explores the question of what happened to the Democratic party since roughly McGovern, which I also found quite insightful.

    6. Re:Challenge for the experts by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Is this "is why qualified" thing some kind of joke? I mean, compared to Trump, a guy who has to go back on something he said pretty much every day...

      One of the most important qualifications for the role of President of the US is to not put your foot in it at every opportunity and end up apologising to other countries or alienating them. Trump will end up the same as Boris Johnson, where other states don't take anything he says seriously because he has a reputation for retracting or just lying and standing by it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Challenge for the experts by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      When we do the reboot of the US let this election show that one ballot option always needs to be "None of the above" and force another vote with new options.

    8. Re:Challenge for the experts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't thrown any insults?

      I took the trouble to research Hillary's decisions and accomplishments over the last 16 years.

      And came up empty.

      There's not a single moment that I could find, no decision or action or award, that Hillary can point to with pride and say "I did this!". The best I can come up with is that she was elected as senator.

      Don't insult me by pretending you don't know how to use Google. It ain't that fucking hard.

      http://addictinginfo.org/2015/04/13/heres-a-list-of-hillary-clintons-accomplishments-so-quit-saying-she-doesnt-have-any/

      Hillary 2016, bitch.

  25. ADD? by sshir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Slashdot is getting ADD.

    Go, read entire series of Snowden's twits on the subject. The whole point is: this disclosure is a warning shot. Imagine if the rest of the files will reveal targets, personally identifiable info on perpetrators, provable attribution etc. God forbid malware targets are in NATO countries or some such. This thing might explode into a serious international scandal.

    Russians are mentioned simply because they might have better motives for pulling this off (with some tit-for-tat hacking going on right now). But that's beside the point.

    1. Re:ADD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone spies on everyone. Countries don't have friends they have interests. What is sad is that people are to stupid to acknowledge that. The US only has allies when someone wants money or military support from the US. In between the requests they just insult and blame the US for any of their current woes to keep their proles in line. I have no idea why people pay attention to anything Snowden says. He stole passwords, download data, and actually thought the US would give him a pass on his crimes. Why did the moron go public while in Chinese controlled territory? Why didn't he go to his Latin America paradise before going public? Nobody was after him until after he went public. Now people treat him as some type of guru when it comes to national security measures. He was a fucking system admin not an intelligence officer. He belongs in Russia. He really needs some perspective to realize what a true totalitarian and surveillance state actually looks like.

  26. Is it Snowden? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we sure it's Snowden? Has anyone reliable confirmed he is still alive after the hashtag he tweeted?

  27. Is that USB stick thing like the football fields? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that USB stick thing a periodistic license the same as they (ab)use the football fields?

    USB doesn't seem the most stealthy of the interfaces for such a risky use.

  28. Desperate clickbait combines NSA and Trumpacolypse by JosephDoeden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Who writes articles like this? Why would Snowden be making such statements. What did he mean when they say "NSA data was likely obtained by someone with physical access to an NSA secure area who managed to walk out with a USB stick loaded with secrets." "calling itself Shadow Brokers is in response to growing tensions between the U.S. and Russia over the hacks on the Democratic groups" It reads like propaganda to me. I don't believe Snowden is in Russia and also still a reliable source of information, especially on matters to do with Russia... a nation with the potential to take over the media and even explode journalists. You can believe what you like about Snowden and the NSA, but trusting the info stream from Snowden inside of Russia is stupid.

  29. Re: by srichard25 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The hacked emails show that the media colluded with the Hillary campaign to shut Bernie out. That story lasted less than 1 day before those same media entities changed the story to focus on the Russian hacker speculation, which was then followed by several days of talking about how Trump supposedly asked Russia to hack the DNC.

    Look -> Squirrel.

  30. Re:Neocon shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    The "NeoCommunists." Dear god, people like you actually still exist.

    Well not for long anyway, judging by your user ID you'll be as dead as McCarthy in a few years. Sleep tight, you paranoid cocksucker.

  31. so what ? by swell · · Score: 1

    Does anyone believe that Russia doesn't hack US systems? Or the reverse? This story might be slightly interesting if it revealed some specific hack that broke new ground. It might be interesting if it had a devastating effect upon US intelligence operations. It might be compelling if we could prove a direct connection to Mr. Putin. And those things may come to pass but they haven't been observed yet.

    So slashdotters are left to speculate, to opine about what may become of this. Thus we may be among the first to insert foot in mouth as we wait for more facts to be available. Click bait.

    We know that Putin doesn't want to deal with Clinton and he thinks Trump will be easier to 'negotiate' with, and so it's easy to believe he is attempting to pull strings; but let's be patient for real evidence of what's happening before we raise our voices.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:so what ? by gcswt · · Score: 1

      If Putin was somehow pulling for Trump to win, he's not doing much to do that. If anything is alarming about this is how much "information" is being released on a possible hostile act by another major nation without the major players involved squashing rumors or speculation. It's not exactly a prime example of secret keeping nor investigative professionalism.

    2. Re:so what ? by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Of course Putin wants Trump to win. All enemies of the west and the USA want Trump to win. He would be an unmitigated disaster.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  32. Re:Desperate clickbait combines NSA and Trumpacoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IDK seems like snowden inside of russia might have some insight into what people in russia are doing...

    Then again when your former employer is hacked, and you didn't leave on the best of terms (like if you set foot in the country again you'll be arrested tried and executed kind of not the best of terms) maybe suggesting the country you are hiding in is behind it and that you might have some special knowledge about it isn't the wisest idea.........

    But what do I know. I've never been forced to flee my country for fear of prosocution (yet).

  33. Re:Hijacked 1st post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get it right dammit. It's "All your base are belong to us."

    Sheesh. Kids these days. Ain't got no respect for the wise sayings of us elders.

  34. Copying someone else software on too servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Copying someone else software on to servers is hardly a smoking gun, anyone involved in this sort of clandestine behaviour is going to make sure they implicate someone else / throw investigations off the trail, no "evidence" in this sort of case can be taken at face value. This is clearly a plant and probably happened after the fact or as part of the initial smoke screen.

  35. Re:Neocon shills by mysticgoat · · Score: 2

    The GOP wasn't hacked cuz it was self-destructing on its own and didn't need any help from Russia to fall completely apart.

    Also there is this possibility that Trump is a Russian agent, doing what he does best, to be rewarded with ownership of a prime vacation palace on the shores of the Crimea. I'm not saying that's what's going on... I mean you just got to wonder. You know? What with being so chummy with Vladimir. It could be.... we'll have to wait and see where Trump goes after he drops out of the race... but I'm just speculating. You know?

  36. Re:Do Americans actually realize what just happene by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The material walked out with a real human. It was then given to the press. More of a US Watergate informant talking to the press about their day job than any real hacking.
    The US cover story sold to the press is that super smart nations got into the US political party computers, stayed in over some time totally undetected, got the data out in bulk and just left a huge amount of logs showing their tool sets and real ip ranges.
    Smart enough to get in, stay but no skills in covering their origins or method.... methods that got presented to the waiting US press in full.
    The covering up of another cleared, trusted person walking out the press with material had to be covered up.
    Blame another nation, roll out their methods to friendly US press to sell the spy plot globally. Hope to sell the hacking fantasy to the tech sector.

    The second story is some NSA tool set got found in use online and master keys to many US brands of OS, telco equipment. More people will be able to go totally undetected or create their own bespoke malware per OS just as security experts warned thanks to junk crypto standards. Lots of ex staff, former staff, nations that worked with the US have had access to the same skills, tools.
    Given to them by the US or borrowed by dual citizen staff, methods kept after projects together. With so many tools floating around, in use, it was only a matter of time until someone tracked the tool sets back and got a copy in the wild...

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  37. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Look -> Squirrel.

    What?

    Where?

    Where did it go?

  38. isn't Snowden still in Russia? by kencurry · · Score: 1

    Doesn't that make him an ungrateful pr*ck to call them out for dirty shenanigans?

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
    1. Re:isn't Snowden still in Russia? by gcswt · · Score: 2

      Why? Russia would want the world to know that nobody's information is safe from them. Even if they weren't involved in this attack at all, there is utility in the rest of the world believing they were. There is a lot of power in having your adversaries think you are capable of something even if you really aren't.

  39. Re: Hijacked 1st post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just set me up the bomb damn you

  40. Re:Do Americans actually realize what just happene by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    The correct phrase is, "I tasted bile." Leave it to Americans to be both ignorant AND disgusting, *sigh*.

    (Before you mod me as a troll--yes, I'm American, and yes, I do know what I'm talking about.)

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  41. Has Snowden Actually Appeared In The Last Week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There have been tweets, but has he appeared on video anywhere?

  42. The answer by dhaen · · Score: 1

    Ban USB - in fact lets's ban Serial - or Busses - yea that'll fix it.

  43. How do they know that they were Russians? by Max_W · · Score: 2

    Were some abracadabra Cyrillic-looking characters left behind? But it is not only Russian language which uses non-Latin alphabet.

  44. Re:Neocon shills by khz6955 · · Score: 1

    "More neocon shilling.. More russian boogeymen that never materialise on your doorstep"

    Yea, my thoughts precisely, it's either one of North Korea, China or Russia ..

  45. Re:Neocon shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or it could just be that they're both far right. Hmm... Naw your theory is funner!

  46. just got it, soooo whats this python thingy??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and how can i use it to get nudes from computers?
    python is a typo for pythong, right? not into computers really

  47. ANSWER THE QUESTION by shanen · · Score: 0

    I'm not interested in your desperate and feeble attempts to change the subject. Answer the question:

    Why do you want to elect Trump and effectively decapitate America?

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:ANSWER THE QUESTION by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      See, this isn't particularly difficult if you're being even vaguely intellectually honest. The very premise of your inflammatory question is false, and it's up to you to show otherwise. To wit:

      she is clearly well qualified to be president and the Donald is clearly fundamentally not qualified

      To which multiple people very politely asked, "how is she clearly well qualified?"

      And to which you first replied with vacuous rhetoric, then, when that was pointed out, simply pounded the table.

      It's clear that you can offer no objective, measurable data points to justify why Hillary is even vaguely qualified, much less well qualified, to be president. This is not surprising.

    2. Re:ANSWER THE QUESTION by shanen · · Score: 1

      Quit your Sophism. We already know you have no positive defense of Donald, but changing the subject is NOT going to work if America has been decapitated.

      However, I predict there are lots of other questions you can't deal with. For example "Who do you hate most?"

      That's the defining characteristic of Trump supporters, but the ones who are smart enough to use computers have apparently learned not to address that one. It was kind of funny in the period when they would try to defend their various hatreds. They must have gotten a memo.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    3. Re:ANSWER THE QUESTION by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Hate? Nah. But I do tend to feel pity for people with such reduced capacity that they (a) can't or don't know how to make a cogent argument and thus just mindlessly cheer for "their team," and (b) dissolve into incomprehensible, name-calling rants when asked a basic question about their mindless cheering.

      Just to put the rattle back on the high chair one last time:
            1. I said nothing whatsoever about Trump.
            2. You said something about Hillary.
            3. I asked you to justify what you said.
            4. You melted down.

      Buh bye, lil' troll. It's been real.

    4. Re:ANSWER THE QUESTION by shanen · · Score: 1

      What is to be said about someone who starts his campaign by declaring all Mexicans are rapists--and goes downhill from there?

      What is to be said to someone who thinks Hillary Clinton has accomplished nothing?

      (It is certainly possible to disagree about the value of some of her accomplishments, though the main thing I don't like about her is that she's just another lawyer. I don't dislike it either because that's just the way the game is rigged these years.)

      Yeah, there are certainly some trolls around here.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    5. Re:ANSWER THE QUESTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is to be said about someone who starts his campaign by declaring all Mexicans are rapists

      He never said that. Citation please.

  48. Strengthens Apples aguement - if you build it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You won't be able to contain it. Welcome to the 21st century.

  49. "I never had sex with that devil" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "At least not in a blue dress. And if I did, what difference does it make now."

  50. Just one by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Only one thing she *could* accomplish: saving the Supreme Court from being packed with right-wing, misogynist (but I repeat myself) psychos that by comparison would even make Scalia look like an actual jurist instead of the corrupt partisan hack that he was.

    Then again, I don't think a GOP-controlled Senate will ever again let any Democratic president appoint another judge at any level, let alone a Supreme. That is their most effective way of delaying (denying) true social progress in the USA - especially the overturning of Citizens United (the Dred Scott of the modern era).

  51. Re:Desperate clickbait combines NSA and Trumpacoly by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2

    I don't believe Snowden is in Russia

    I do. There aren't really a lot of places he could be and be protected from being killed or forcibly brought back to stand trial in the USA. Given that both his father and girlfriend have both been seen getting on flights to Moscow to visit him, you seem to be suggesting a highly unlikely scenario here.

    and also still a reliable source of information, especially on matters to do with Russia... a nation with the potential to take over the media and even explode journalists. You can believe what you like about Snowden and the NSA, but trusting the info stream from Snowden inside of Russia is stupid.

    Now you are dead on the money with this comment, but I got branded a troll here the last time I made a post suggesting something negative about Snowden. We'll see how yours does.

  52. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look -> Squirrel.

    Look -> Democracy and Free Press!... There it went!

  53. Pivot honeypot more likely by laughingskeptic · · Score: 1

    It would be easier to get the tools off of a honeypot that was set up to entice the use of the tools rather than to get them by hacking the Equation Group. If you want the Equation Group's tools all you have to do is convince them that they have found a chink in the armor of a high value target. Let them own a computer (referred to as the pivot in the hacking world) that seems to have access to further hardened targets. The tools will start appearing. A Potemkin honeypot.

  54. Title is dead wrong, as is the ArsTechnica article by Rujiel · · Score: 2

    Dave Aitel DID NOT SAY the DNC hack was the Russians. He said THIS hack was the Russians. Snowden similarly did not say the DNC hack was the Russians, he said THIS hack was, and that it was related to the eacalation after the DNC hack--that is, accusations toward Russia afterwards. There is zero evidence that the DNC hack was rhe Russians, nor that it was even so sophistocated as to require a state actor.

  55. BULL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snowden is STILL working for the U.S. government. Convincing the public that the government has more capabilities than they really have.

    In this case, the tools are released by the NSA because they are spyware, as the NSA has done before along with their Linux Distro.

  56. Re:Neocon shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to watch this. Clinton seems like a massive neocon. Trump is asking sane and rational questions. If the press was worth anything they'd have a real debate about this stuff, instead the personality on CNN does his best to deflect and avoid discussing the most important topic.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCMyHJJrdDw

  57. Re:Neocon shills by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    You forgot to mention the link between Clinton and the Russian Uranium mining company getting rights to US government land.

    Basically, whatever you think you have on Trump probably reflects back on Clinton as well. If one is corrupt, then both are.

    Vote Gary Johnson.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  58. Obvious troll is obvious by Rujiel · · Score: 1

    The "snowden's a double agent!" line didn't work in 2013, why do you think anyone would believe you now?

  59. Re:Neocon shills by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Got any evidence for the false equivalence?

    Clinton's connection with the uranium sale is well known. At a time when Russia was acting friendlier than it is now, Clinton, along with several other people, approved a sale that benefited Russia. It was an overt and legal act. I've seen speculation on Clinton's motives, but not on the other participant's motives, so I discount it.

    In contrast, we've got a much less friendly Russia, and (inconclusive) evidence that it's committing crimes to influence a US election. I completely fail to see the similarity.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  60. Re:Title is dead wrong, as is the ArsTechnica arti by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Nope. There's evidence that the DNC hack had Russian involvement. It isn't conclusive, but we may never get conclusive evidence on this. I don't think there's actual evidence of Russian state involvement, although it seems like reasonable speculation to me.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  61. Emotional masterbation of 1673220 by shanen · · Score: 1

    Z^14

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  62. Hey, Okian Warrior, have you nothing to say now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've proven you wrong. At the very least, aren't you going to man-up and admit it?

    Or are you going to keep up the charade by pretending you didn't read my post, because I'm posting A/C?

    Let's see who the real coward is.

    Hillary 2016 and you can't stop it.

  63. Re:Title is dead wrong, as is the ArsTechnica arti by Rujiel · · Score: 1

    Link me, then. And i was correct that neither Snowden nor Aitel have blamed Russia for the DNC leaks.