Slashdot Mirror


Wrong Chemical Dumped Into Olympic Pools Made Them Green (arstechnica.com)

Z00L00K writes: [Ars Technica reports:] "After a week of trying to part with green tides in two outdoor swimming pools, Olympic officials over the weekend wrung out a fresh mea culpa and yet another explanation -- neither of which were comforting. According to officials, a local pool-maintenance worker mistakenly added 160 liters of hydrogen peroxide to the waters on August 5, which partially neutralized the chlorine used for disinfection. With chlorine disarmed, the officials said that 'organic compounds' -- i.e. algae and other microbes -- were able to grow and turn the water a murky green in the subsequent days. The revelation appears to contradict officials' previous assurances that despite the emerald hue, which first appeared Tuesday, the waters were safe." I would personally have avoided using the green pools, but that's just me. "Hydrogen peroxide is sometimes used in pools -- often to de-chlorinate them," reports Ars. "Basically, the chemical, a common household disinfectant, is a weak acid that reacts with chlorine and chlorine-containing compounds to release oxygen and form other chlorine-containing compounds. Those may not be good at disinfecting pools, but they still may be picked up by monitoring systems. Hydrogen peroxide can also be used to disinfect pools but must be maintained in the waters -- not a one-time dumping -- and can't be used in combination with chlorine." Apparently, the green water irritates eyes and smells like farts.

180 comments

  1. ah, yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    /. on the ball as usual with "news"

    1. Re:ah, yes by rickb928 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ok, I'll plow into this.

      Pool chemistry is, well, chemistry. And despite the offhand IOC statement that "chemistry is not an exact science", chemistry is science. And it's an excellent topic for /.

      Maintaining my little 10,000 gallon play pool has been an interesting adventure;

      - In Arizona, sunlight and temperature conspire to make pool maintenance a challenge; sunlight by itself both encourages everything you don't want in your pool (algae and bacteria for two) and decomposes chlorine, your most common disinfectant and algaecide.
      - Cyanuric Acid (CYA), used as a chlorine stabilizer, also binds chlorine so that it is ineffective as a disinfectant etc. And it does not, itself, decompose easily or quickly. CYA is used in residential pools to simplify management (intermittent filtering and circulation mean chlorine levels would fluctuate without stablizer) and to reduce cost (burnt off chlorine requires adding more). Commercial pools don't typically need this, and indoor pools even less.
      - Chlorine tablets (most commonly Trichloro-S-Triazinetrione) and much granulated chlorine (commonly Calcium Hypochlorite, so-called 'shock') contain CYA, and each bit you use adds CYA to your pool, eventually increasing the concentration to the point that it renders chlorine ineffective.
      - Now you get to increase the amount of chlorine you use, also increasing the CYA, and the effect compounds itself.
      - The solution is to drain the pool, reducing the concentrations, and add your chlorine sources to restore the level, starting the cycle again. Yes, you do.
      - I now use an erosion dispenser that doesn't float, and it works insanely well. CYA levels of 110ppm force my free chlorine levels to test 1ppm, but the pool is clear and free of algae and detectable contaminants.
      - Commercial and Olympic pools would never use erosion dispensers. I expect them to use gas systems. And using CYA is wrong for these pools because they should be constantly dispensed, constantly monitored, and chlorine expense is

      So my challenges are different than those at the Games, but similar in some details.

      I tried liquid chlorine (Sodium Hypochlorate, Clorox without the perfume and higher concentrate) for a while, but it's not as effective and requires constantly measuring and pouring, whereas tablets dissolve (erode, hence those floaters called erosion dispensers) without intervention or attention beyond filling it when they are gone. I gave that up without buying or trying to build an automated dispenser, just not worth it yet.

      The problem at the Olympics has been well discussed, but from my view as a residential pool owner:

      0. They let the chemistry get out of hand. I expect such a pool, at such an event, to be constantly monitored. Inexcusable.
      1. Having let it get out of hand, a proper shock by adjusting the pH and alkalinity, using, for instance, a disodiumsalt of ethylenediaminetetraaceticaciddihydratediammoniumsulfate (this is a proprietary product that works), then Calcium Hypochlorate or other chlorine should have cleared the pool overnight. It does mine, even in 90 overnight temps, the only difference being quantities. A filter aid would clear the milky residue that we saw on TV. This process can be used to successfully clear a pool in 12 hours.
      2. Using Hydrogen Peroxide wasn't just a mistake, it was malpractice, and I would fire the nimrod that decided that. It is incompatible with chlorine, period. Huge mistake.
      3. the filters should be running constantly, not because of demand but because of the critical nature of maintenance. These are used throughout most of the day, are critical to the Games, and no excuses. Similarly the disinfectant systems. It's not about the cost, it's about the money.
      4. Each pool should have had its own filtration and disinfectant systems. Of course.

      I give the maintenance teams a grade of F. Just incompetent in these pools, and no such failure is acceptable.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:ah, yes by Cowclops · · Score: 3

      You beat me to writing the exact post I was about to write. Completely mind blowingly unacceptable maintenance. When my pool goes green, its because I was out of town for 2 weeks and didn't pay anyone to check it and forgot to top off the chlorinator, but sometimes I have more impotant things to handle than whether my pool is readily swimmable. As far as cyanuric acid is concerned, I was blown away when i discovered the relationshi between CYA, chlorine, and the effect of sunlight on the pool. At 50ppm CYA, you need like 3-5 ppm chlorine to keep the pool clean, and sunlight prevents the chlorine from breaking down as fast, but it makes shocking it very expensive if you forget your pool for a week and it turns green. Meanwhile, at a CYA level of 0, it might only take .25 to .5 ppm to keep it clean and as little as 1-2 to shock a green pool, but with no CYA, sunlight will destroy the chlorine instantly. In the middle levels of 10-30 CYA, you don't need as a high of a chlorine reading, and sun doesn't destroy the chlorine instantly, but you still need to watch it, BUT you can also dose less chlorine when you do. Its when the CYA gets up to like 100 that even shocking the pool becomes difficult because you need like 20ppm and even in a 24' 4' deep above ground, thats like 2 whole gallons of shock, and you might need to do that more than once. Gets expensive quick... easier just to keep the chlorine and cya levels lower.

    3. Re:ah, yes by toadlife · · Score: 1

      Excellent post.

      troublefreepool.com?

      I have a 25,000 gallon IG gunnite pool and the few times over the years it has gone green it was my fault for being negligent.

      The authorities were probably right about the pool being safe though. A little algae bloom is not dangerous.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    4. Re: ah, yes by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      My post was entirely my own. I didn't copy or paste anything except for name of the ammoniated salts.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    5. Re: ah, yes by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Nobody has to root for anything - things like the mugging of athletes, or a soldier getting killed while troops entered one of the bad neighborhoods, or some athletes getting sick after diving in the pool - all this stuff is unprecedented in the Olympics anywhere - be it in Europe, US/Canada, Australasia... This was the great opportunity Rio had to make the first games in LatAm a great success, and they completely blew it! Which is a shame!

    6. Re:ah, yes by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      They probably used Baquacil!

    7. Re: ah, yes by toadlife · · Score: 1

      I wasn't implying that you copied/pasted. I was asking if you are a visitor/member of the site. It has a wealth of information on pool chemistry. It's where I learned how to take care of my pool.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    8. Re: ah, yes by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      It's one of the sites I refer to. Lots of others, but it would be my choice for the only one.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    9. Re:ah, yes by toadlife · · Score: 1

      They were told it was a "saltwater pool" so it didn't need chlorine.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  2. Re:The wet dream for the dorks here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You don't even need to point to the spot on the doll where the mean /. posters touched you. It's clearly the butt by the way you're unable to sit down.

  3. variety by symes · · Score: 4, Funny

    I do feel the color options for Olympic pools could be greatly expanded. Green and a slight blue are not enough, We should have red pools and purple pools as well. Deep blues and pinks wouldn't go amiss either. But not yellow pools, that might be distracting.

    1. Re:variety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swimmers would not like that idea.

    2. Re:variety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lake Hillier is red; now all we need to do is find some way to transport weird microbes from Australia to Brazil:

      https://londoncallingconf.co.uk/2016/plenary/browse#305

    3. Re:variety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like I care about the view of some whiny fish wannabe about the color of their toilet.

    4. Re:variety by jrumney · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lake Hillier is red; now all we need to do is find some way to transport weird microbes from Australia to Brazil

      Wouldn't it be cheaper just to move the diving board to the shallow end?

    5. Re: variety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Olympic swimming and diving, not college football at Boise State or Eastern Washington.

    6. Re:variety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do feel the color options for Olympic pools could be greatly expanded. Green and a slight blue are not enough, We should have red pools and purple pools as well. Deep blues and pinks wouldn't go amiss either. But not yellow pools, that might be distracting.

      Forget the pools. They should dump that shit into some of their toxic waterways.

    7. Re:variety by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 1

      Lake Hillier is red; now all we need to do is find some way to transport weird microbes from Australia to Brazil:

      "Your grant request is denied. In fact, we established this fund specifically to find ways to prevent the transport of weird microbes from country to country. We've reported this exchange to Interpol."

    8. Re:variety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      <woodstock> Stay out of the brown pool! The brown water is bad! </woodstock>

      Isn't that the other color they have at The Games this year?

    9. Re:variety by Talderas · · Score: 1

      They just need to have five pools colored blue, green, red, yellow, and black. Arranged in the proper order of course.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  4. Because a pool cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just happened to have 100+ gallons of hydrogen peroxide sitting around.

    More likely, they tried to be clever and use it in an attempt to sanitize the pool after a test for high bacterial load.

    1. Re: Because a pool cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      160 liters are only about 50 gallons, but who would carry that much on their belt?

    2. Re: Because a pool cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be wierd if a pool cleaner DIDN'T have access to a lot of hydrogen peroxide.

    3. Re: Because a pool cleaner by yuriklastalov · · Score: 0

      Is this some new troll? Give it up bro, you're terrible at it.

    4. Re: Because a pool cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is Rio or the Olympic committee paying a bunch of shills to post asinine shit? You sound just like the Russians any time someone starts talking about putin

    5. Re: Because a pool cleaner by konohitowa · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Obviously he just hasn't posted the same comment in enough threads. I'm sure he'll get some bites if he keeps casting.

    6. Re: Because a pool cleaner by Khyber · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Found the NBC shill.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    7. Re: Because a pool cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That post is not entirely wrong. Viral loads in mid-latitude waters correlate with bacterial load in many cases. Testing for bacterial load is cheaper, which is why that's frequently done. However, the bacterial load tends to be lower in tropical and in salty waters. There isn't a lot of bacteria in the water around Rio. However, it isn't necessarily an indicator of a corresponding low viral load under the conditions in Rio. Bacterial infections really are pretty unlikely, but viral infections are a more realistic concern.

    8. Re: Because a pool cleaner by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      That post is not entirely wrong. Viral loads in mid-latitude waters correlate with bacterial load in many cases. Testing for bacterial load is cheaper, which is why that's frequently done. However, the bacterial load tends to be lower in tropical and in salty waters. There isn't a lot of bacteria in the water around Rio. However, it isn't necessarily an indicator of a corresponding low viral load under the conditions in Rio. Bacterial infections really are pretty unlikely, but viral infections are a more realistic concern.

      Not sure if this is related but viruses do live a lot longer on cold surfaces than warm. Thats why you get a 'flu season'. The chemical reactions which would break down the viral casing is retarded in cold conditions.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    9. Re: Because a pool cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't know for sure, but I'll cite my source for making that statement:

      http://www.espn.com/olympics/story/_/id/17190109/study-rio-de-janeiro-waterways-filthy-teeming-dangerous-viruses-bacteria

      The crux of the issue lies in the different types of testing used to determine the health and safety of recreational waters.

      Bacterial tests measure levels of coliforms -- different types of bacteria that tend not to cause illnesses themselves but are indicators of potentially harmful sewage-borne pathogens such as other bacteria, viruses and protozoa that can cause cholera, dysentery, hepatitis A and typhoid, among other diseases. Bacterial tests are the worldwide standard because they're cheap and easy.

      But there's a growing consensus that bacterial tests are not ideal for all climates; bacteria break down quickly in tropical weather and salty marine waters. In contrast, viruses have been shown to survive for weeks, months or even years -- meaning that in tropical Rio, low bacterial markers can be completely out of step with high virus levels.

      That disparity was borne out in the AP's testing. For instance, in June 2016, the levels of fecal coliforms in water samples from Copacabana and Ipanema beaches were extremely low, with just 31 and 85 fecal coliforms per 100 milliliters, respectively. But still, both had alarming readings for rotavirus, the main cause of gastroenteritis, with 7.22 million rotaviruses per liter detected in the waters of Copacabana; 32.7 million rotaviruses per liter were found in the waters of Ipanema Beach.

    10. Re: Because a pool cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chemical reactions which would break down the viral casing is reactionarily challenged in cold conditions.

      FTFY

    11. Re: Because a pool cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you the cow and luddite guy? If so you really need to find a job.

    12. Re: Because a pool cleaner by msauve · · Score: 0

      "... break down the viral casing is retarded in cold conditions."

      FTFY - "the viral casing is break down challenged in cold conditions."

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    13. Re: Because a pool cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a nonsensical statement. Typos happen, get on with your life.

    14. Re: Because a pool cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be wierd if a pool cleaner DIDN'T have access to a lot of hydrogen peroxide.

      It wouldn't be weirder if an anonymous coward could write a post without a spelling error!

      pool nurd butt hert ovir a spill'n errur?

    15. Re:Because a pool cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would a first aid crew put a neck brace on someone with a broken leg? (And then drop him!) Viva Brasil!

    16. Re: Because a pool cleaner by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      No, it would not. Hydrogen Peroxide is not used with Chlorine. They could use H2O2, but there isn't any report they do, so I doubt they actually did.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    17. Re: Because a pool cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... break down the viral casing is retarded in cold conditions." FTFY - "the viral casing is break down challenged in cold conditions."

      I thought the viral casing breakdown was slowed in cold conditions?

    18. Re: Because a pool cleaner by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Also found the NBC shills with mod points!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    19. Re: Because a pool cleaner by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "... break down the viral casing is retarded in cold conditions."

      FTFY - "the viral casing is break down challenged in cold conditions."

      phew, at least I didn't describe the virii as 'window lickers'

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    20. Re: Because a pool cleaner by msauve · · Score: 1
      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  5. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the point of posting this days late, written the way it is?

    Any self respecting nerd has already looked up how H2O2, Cl2, H2O react days ago.

    1. Re:Why? by penguinoid · · Score: 0

      Any self respecting nerd has already looked up how H2O2, Cl2, H2O react days ago.

      I believe you mean years ago, but maybe some nerds are more self-respecting than others.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re:Why? by konohitowa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I found the explanation amusing. Now I'm looking forward to the explanation of how two dangerous chemicals, sodium and chlorine, combine to form a compound essential to life.

      They need to rebrand this page in yellow and black and call it "Slashdot for Dummies".

    3. Re:Why? by beanpoppa · · Score: 1

      I have high blood pressure, you insensitive clod.

  6. Re: LOL! Serves them right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Useful things like posting on Slashdot.

  7. Timing is everything by chrism238 · · Score: 0, Troll

    The facts of this story have been "everywhere" for about 5 days, now, and yet it's just made it to Slashdot? Perhaps more Slashdot readers need to step away from Slashdot more often?

    1. Re:Timing is everything by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not on the news in every part of the world. And it took a while from submission to presentation where the editor obfuscated the content as well, original submission here: https://slashdot.org/submissio...

      The fact that someone screwed up is one thing, but it's good to also get some information on what the screwup was and the consequences of it - that it wasn't entirely safe from a health point of view. At least it didn't create mustard gas.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Timing is everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New /. motto: If you can't beat 'em in the first news cycle, try to scoop the 1-week reposts. :D

    3. Re:Timing is everything by CaptainLard · · Score: 2

      If we're going back to the old school complaints about story timeliness, maybe we can also go back to old school summaries and keep up with the scientific explanations..you know, smells like sulfur or whatever.

      "Smells like farts" ...making America great again I guess.

    4. Re:Timing is everything by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

      Wrong. The fact that the pool turned green was everywhere, the official explanation as to why wasn't.

    5. Re:Timing is everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw this official explanation 2 days ago.

    6. Re:Timing is everything by quenda · · Score: 0

      The facts of this story have been "everywhere" for about 5 days, now, and yet it's just made it to Slashdot?

      This means Slashdot is improving. Slashdot - always with the latest news.

    7. Re:Timing is everything by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

      The facts of this story have been "everywhere" for about 5 days, now, and yet it's just made it to Slashdot? Perhaps more Slashdot readers need to step away from Slashdot more often?

      The fact the pool turned green, yes. However, the actual reason for it (hydrogen peroxide being dumped in it) was only revealed today everywhere. In between then and now, it was pure speculation as to why the pools turned green, though most people suspected algae. Most people also thought it was a shortage of chlorine and muriatic acid causing the pH to rise, not that someone dumped a pile of hydrogen peroxide.

      Of course, it isn't rocket surgery how to maintain the chemical balance of a swimming pool, and most pools generally err on the side of being over chlorinated than under to keep the nasties at bay.

    8. Re:Timing is everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then they would read this: https://techcrunch.com/2016/08/16/china-launches-the-first-quantum-communications-satellite-and-what-is-that-exactly/

      Shortly after we would have a thousand posts about how this doesn't/can't/won't work. Until a new understanding of the science is provided and the flat-earthers would eventually catch up.

    9. Re:Timing is everything by bungo · · Score: 1

      Well, if we're going old school....

      First Piss!

      (more appropriate in this context than post) ...Naked and petrified...

      --
      "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
    10. Re:Timing is everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to be a perfectly cromulent phrase.

    11. Re: Timing is everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If they ended all the summaries with "apparently, it smells like farts" they would probably get more readers.

    12. Re:Timing is everything by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      "Smells like farts" ...making America great again I guess.

      When the submitter wrote "irritates eyes and smells like farts", they were probably just looking for something the average Slashdotter might be able to empathize with.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    13. Re:Timing is everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > However, the actual reason for it (hydrogen peroxide being dumped in it) was only revealed today everywhere.

      Ars reported it was Hydrogen Peroxide on the 15th. It's been known about that for some days.

    14. Re:Timing is everything by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      News24 in South Africa had the official peroxide explanation on the 14th already. http://www.sport24.co.za/OtherSport/Olympics2016/rio-diving-pool-drained-of-green-water-20160814

      If the bottom end of Africa had it then, then the world had it.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    15. Re:Timing is everything by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Of course, it isn't rocket surgery how to maintain the chemical balance of a swimming pool, and most pools generally err on the side of being over chlorinated than under to keep the nasties at bay.

      If done correctly, it's actually biotechnology. You can get enzymes for pools or hot tubs that only require that you add a few drops now and then. Using chlorine or peroxide is insensible.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Timing is everything by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      However, the actual reason for it (hydrogen peroxide being dumped in it) was only revealed today everywhere.

      Actually news of the hydrogen peroxide dump made the rounds on the weekend.

      There's no need to defend it, it's well known enough that Slashdot is slow as far as news aggregates go. It's been the punch line of jokes as a result.

      The more important question is if a story about someone stuffing up chlorine at a sporting event belongs on here at all.

    17. Re:Timing is everything by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      I was watching the Olympics over the weekend and numerous times they mentioned someone had dumped in hydrogen peroxide by accident, neutralizing the effects of the chlorine.

      Maybe it wasn't an official statement but the cause was known.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    18. Re:Timing is everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that someone screwed up is one thing, but it's good to also get some information on what the screwup was and the consequences of it - that it wasn't entirely safe from a health point of view. At least it didn't create mustard gas.

      So you're saying bio-weapons used on the Olympic athletes is better than using chemical weapons on them? I'd have to disagree - chemical issues would be confined to those exposed, bio issues will follow them back to their home countries - so basically impact the entire world.

    19. Re:Timing is everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can usually treat infections, Scars caused by chemical burns are another matter.

    20. Re:Timing is everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most times my farts do irritate the eyes.

    21. Re:Timing is everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact the pool turned green, yes. However, the actual reason for it (hydrogen peroxide being dumped in it) was only revealed today everywhere.

      Unless by "today" you mean at least 3 days ago, you are greatly mistaken: http://gizmodo.com/we-finally-...

    22. Re:Timing is everything by twotacocombo · · Score: 1

      I use hydrogen peroxide to kill algae in my aquariums. It's absolute murder on some of the toughest algae that's almost impossible to get rid of otherwise. For them to say that dumping in a load of HP actually caused the algae doesn't pass the sniff test for me. Also, algae needs nutrients to survive and grow. If that pool turned green overnight, a lack of chlorine wasn't the only problem going on.

    23. Re:Timing is everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they thought as you did. Unfortunately, what hydrogen peroxide does in a chlorinated swimming pool has very little to do with what it does in an aquarium. The two chemicals just neutralized each other and turned the pool into a pond of growth medium open to the elements. In a place like Rio, there's no shortage of nutrients and algae spores in the environment - with nothing to control the algae in the water, it just bloomed.

    24. Re:Timing is everything by Gussington · · Score: 1

      However, the actual reason for it (hydrogen peroxide being dumped in it) was only revealed today everywhere.

      It was in our news on the weekend: http://www.abc.net.au/news/201...

  8. Brazil... by drew_92123 · · Score: 1

    They can build decent aircraft but can't figure out how to properly maintain a pool... and for the Olympics no less... geez...

    1. Re: Brazil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not nearly as simple as that. In terms of outdoor water supplies, I'm not sure it's particularly dangerous. Bacteria break down quickly in tropical water, though viruses are a bigger problem. But there are plenty of nasty water supplies in other places. For example, there are brain eating amoebas that live in deeper water in the United States. While water treatment means human activities don't pollute the water like in Brazil, plenty of other nasty things can live there, including things that don't die as readily outside of the tropics.

      As for the diving well, it's a mistake that shouldn't happen, but sounds like the result of human error. Can you trust pools in the United States to be sanitary? Human error and incompetence can occur anywhere. It might be a good thing that this happened in an outdoor pool in Rio, where at least the rapid growth of the algae quickly alerted everyone that something wasn't right. It's less likely that algae would have grown quickly in an indoor pool, which might have allowed harmful things like bacteria and viruses to grow more before it became obvious there was a problem. Once the algae bloomed, adding a large amount of chlorine is one of the recommended steps to treat the problem in any pool. I don't see why human error and incompetence are inherently less likely in, say, Beijing or London. It could happen in Indianapolis, where Olympic trials take place. Can you trust a hotel pool to be safe and clean? There was at least a lot of monitoring at the Olympics to quickly test for safety and then to act accordingly. I'd bet many hotel pool are far more unhealthy than the diving well ever became. Back in 2008, one in eight public swimming pools in the United States were immediately shut down after inspection because of unsafe water or other dangerous conditions.

      Also, the chemical smell that pools sometimes get is actually from chloramines, which develop from the interaction of chlorine with things like bacteria. If a pool has a strong smell, it's quite possibly unsafe. And chloramines aren't safe, either. Thats also what forms when you mix ammonia and bleach.

      As for my statement about public pools: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Wellness/cdc-swimming-pools-pose-infection-risk/story?id=10711137

      While the green algae blooming drew a lot of attention, I don't see this as being a result of incompetence from hosting the Olympics in Rio. I'd much rather swim in the diving well in Rio than take my chances with many public pools in the United States.

    2. Re:Brazil... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      They can build decent aircraft but can't figure out how to properly maintain a pool... and for the Olympics no less... geez...

      Brazil has nice big beaches, full of topless chicks, covering up their butts with shoestring bikinis.

      Why would anyone want to go to a pool at all . . . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Brazil... by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The turds and the muggings are kind of a turn off.

    4. Re:Brazil... by Parker+Lewis · · Score: 1

      To build aircraft, politicians are not involved.

    5. Re:Brazil... by caseih · · Score: 1

      Um, no. Like the aviation industry in any country, including the US and Europe, building commercial aircraft always involves government. Embraer takes it share of government subsidies and likely has to deal with the resulting meddling that comes with that.

    6. Re:Brazil... by Parker+Lewis · · Score: 1

      Yes. Embraer was founded by the gov, but it got privatization. it's a S.A. company: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... The Olympics are fully 100% gov with IOC helping to not blow the deadlines.

  9. How does this contradict officials? by guises · · Score: 2

    The revelation appears to contradict officials' previous assurances that despite the emerald hue, which first appeared Tuesday, the waters were safe.

    How does this work? You don't want tons of algae growing in your pool, but there's nothing particularly dangerous about it. It reduces the ability of chlorine to sanitize the water, which still doesn't make the pools "unsafe", and since they reportedly dumped in a bunch of extra chlorine anyway (that's what was irritating the athletes' eyes)... Again, how does this contradict the officials' previous statements?

    I'm not a pool expert, maybe there's something I don't know here, but you can't just throw in a sentence like that and offer nothing to back it up. I even checked the article and everything (going above and beyond here) - nada.

    1. Re: How does this contradict officials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Since the "officials" had no knowledge of how the pool was treated, they cannot offer assurances that it's "safe." They just don't know.

      Dumping in a lot of chlorine is not sufficient to sanitize a pool. The PH also needs to be in the proper range (7.2 - 7.8). The water also needs to be pumped through the filter for 8 - 12 hours a day (24 if cleaning up a green pool). The surfaces of the pool need to be brushed to move dead algae from the pool surface into the water (after which the filter will catch it).

    2. Re: How does this contradict officials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That gets you a *clean* pool. But *safe* does not equal to *clean*, it is safe when there are not enough pathogens in the water to cause illness on a normal human (not overly healthy, but not immuno-deprieved either), and the chemical levels are not high enough to cause damage.

      A pool out of the desired pH range can indeed be dangerous, but it depends on how much. I drink pH 7.8+ water every day as medication, for one thing. Slightly acid water won't cause any lasting damage, either, and the unbalanced pH it is going to really degrade virii capsules.

      The green algae are not dangerous to health by themselves either (it is actually *food*), and won't decompose in high-chlorinate media like that pool was after they dumped a crapload of NaClO on it when the algae was detected either. The filter was turned on 24/7.

    3. Re:How does this contradict officials? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      From the summary:

      Apparently, the green water irritates eyes and smells like farts.

      Both are indications the water is not suitable to swim in. It should not smell bad (bad smells are generally caused by something that's bad for us, we've evolved to find such compounds repulsive), and certainly not be irritating to the eyes. So, no, it was not safe.

    4. Re:How does this contradict officials? by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      You don't want tons of algae growing in your pool, but there's nothing particularly dangerous about it. It reduces the ability of chlorine to sanitize the water, which still doesn't make the pools "unsafe"

      If they can't get the big stuff like algae under control, what other smaller, more harmful microorganisms are hanging around due to the lack of proper sanitation?

    5. Re:How does this contradict officials? by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      You don't want tons of algae growing in your pool, but there's nothing particularly dangerous about it.

      They are growing because of lack of adequate levels of chlorine, i.e. adequate sanitation. All kinds of other bad things are growing in there along with it.

      Dumping some chlorine in doesn't solve the problem, as that chlorine gets used up extremely quickly trying to kill the vast amounts of organic life in the pool that's making it look green. It can take several days of continuous pumping, filtering, and scrubbing, along with keeping the chlorine at very high levels (4x to 10x the normal levels are needed to break down complex organism vs. just keeping them from growing in the first place) by frequently adding it to the water is needed just to clear up a green backyard pool..

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
  10. Re:LOL! Serves them right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    While I don't care what the Athletes themselves do I pretty much have to agree the Olympics are a huge money pit for their hosts. In the Sydney games for example the games not only failed to stimulate economic growth they effectively reduced consumption. At the end of the day the games ended up costing every Australian household around $400...

  11. Re:technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll ring for the waaaambulance.

    In the meantime, please do try to come up with something better than, "Anything I don't happen to be interested in doesn't count as 'technology'."

  12. Re:technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's green pool water in a place notorious for bad water conditions. It absolutely has nothing to do with technology. I'm not sure what point your trying to make, but poster is correct. This story is not in line with slashdot cannon. "News for nerds stuff that matters" How is this news for nerds? How does this matter? Who does it matter to?

  13. Re:technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least calling a waaaaambulance requires telecommunications which is slightly relevant, can we perhaps get a story about something to do with telecommunications instead of 'water turns green' like that is a thing?

    This is a silly story, and should not appear here. It lowers the bar and it lowers us being exposed to it.

    Delete the entire story, it does not belong on slashdot, it is not technology related

  14. Re:LOL! Serves them right! by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Wasn't L.A. the only one in recent(!) memory to turn a profit?

    And that was probably because everything was already there... The Coliseum, Pauly Pavillion, the Sports Arena (RIP), The Forum, the Rose Bowl...

    I think the only thing that really had to be built was the aquatic center, and I think USC covered most of that.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  15. I have another theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pool used to be blue, like the one next to it.
    I learnt in school that when you mix blue and yellow you get green. Did a diving team have an accident in the pool?

  16. Re: Whatever Color by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Um, no. This is basically putting your fingers in your ears and yelling la-la-la-la-la to avoid hearing the actual science.

    Pools are treated with hypochlorite, which is one way to kill bacteria. It's one measure, in addition to filtering systems. Hydrogen peroxide can also kill bacteria, but it isn't used with hypochlorite. The result is the production of water, oxygen, and sodium chloride. Instead of hypochlorite, you'd get chlorine ions in the water. Chlorine ions won't kill bacteria and algae.

    Though algae can form in indoor pools, it's more common outdoors. Testing for chlorine in the water didn't reveal anything anomalous, probably because of testing for free chlorine instead of hypochlorite. The conditions allowed the rapid growth of algae, which turned the water green. If the testing didn't reveal anything anomalous, it's possible that the contractor responsible for maintaining the pool wouldn't have noticed. The algae made it blatantly obvious there was a problem. The response was to shock the pool with calcium hypochlorite, which would make it easy to remove the algae. This also increased the hypochlorite in the pool, making it safe again. The fart smell was hydrogen sulfide, a result of the algae. The irritation was from the large amount of hypochlorite used to shock the pool.

    The algae caused officials to act, which probably mitigated any impact from microbes in the pool. I'm not convinced the water in the diving well was ever particularly unsafe.

    One in every eight public pools inspected in 2008 in the United States was shut down from unsafe and unsanitary conditions. I'd bet that swimming in many public pools is far more like swimming in a toilet bowl than anything that ever happened in the Olympic pool. The real issue is the complete ineptitude of the IOC and their inability to get their story straight. That said, you're probably far more likely to get sick from swimming in a public pools in the United States than swimming in the diving well in Rio. I'd much rather swim in the diving well than a hotel pool, that's for sure.

    Unfortunately, there are too many knee-jerk reactions like yours that are based on an ignorance of science.

  17. And in other news... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    ...Pool supply company Eurinott has announced the release of a new chemical that reacts quickly with chlorine to produce a remarkable and embarrassing colour change when people relieve themselves in your pool.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:And in other news... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      ...Pool supply company Eurinott has announced the release of a new chemical that reacts quickly with chlorine to produce a remarkable and embarrassing colour change when people relieve themselves in your pool.

      All joking aside... I've heard that people receiving themselves in a swimming pool is what makes the chlorine smell so strong, due to a reaction between uric acid and chlorine.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:And in other news... by FrankSchwab · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Partly.

      The "chlorine" smell in pools is from Chloramines - a compound made of chorine and amines (ammonia). You get more of it from urine, but it'll build up anyway from other sources. The Chloramines are also what stings and irritates the eyes, nose, and lungs.

      How do you get rid of it? Raise the free chlorine level in the pool to 10 ppm or so (normal range is 1 - 3 ppm). Presto, changeo, the pool stops smelling like chlorine.

      Cryptosporidium is a difficult to remove parasite that can exist in pool water. How do you treat pool water that's been contaminated with crypto? Raise the chlorine level to 10 ppm for 24 hours (20 ppm if you use stabilized chlorine).

      Me? I just keep my pool between 10-20 ppm chlorine all the time. Crystal clear water, no algae, no eye irritation, no chlorine smell, no nasties in the water, no side effects at all. My kids swim in it eyes wide open for hours at a time, friends come over and say "I'm glad you don't use too much chlorine; I can't even smell it".

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    3. Re:And in other news... by RedEars · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What FC (free chlorine) level is necessary to maintain a sanitized pool is entirely dependent on the current CYA (stabilizer) level. The more stabilizer present, the higher FC level that is needed. CYA is needed to protect FC from UV light but too much is a bad thing. For example, if you have 30 ppm CYA, you MUST maintain at least 2 ppm FC or greater at all times. If your CYA is at 60 ppm, you must maintain at least 5 ppm FC or greater at all times. This is for normal, daily sanitation. Minimum FC = 7.5% of CYA level. Indoor pools, it's not necessary to use CYA, but low amounts (10-30 ppm) can help buffer the harshness of chlorine and allow for easier maintenance of FC levels. Also, to clear a pool of algae, how high you need to raise the FC to fully eliminate algae depends on CYA level. Many times it takes longer than 24 hours of maintaining this higher FC level to clear the algae depending on how much algae, filtration capability... etc. For example, if your CYA is at 60 ppm, you'd need to elevate the FC to 24 ppm and keep it there until the algae is gone. "Shock" level FC is 40% of CYA level.

      --
      He who forgets will be destined to remember. - EV
    4. Re:And in other news... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      My kids swim in it eyes wide open for hours at a time

      How do they manage to go that long without blinking?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:And in other news... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Indoor pools, it's not necessary to use CYA,

      Not that I'm ever likely to have a swimming pool at home (more likely to live where the snorkelling and SCUBA diving would tempt me out to sea), but does "indoor pool" include one open to the air but with a sufficiency of sunroof (VIS translucent plastic, whatever) to keep UV levels on the water surface low? I'm assuming that it's the UV that does for your free chlorine by photodissociation and the free Cl* radicals being mopped up by any organic molecules around.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  18. Re: LOL! Serves them right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have no problem with new venues being built, provided there's a plan to use them afterwards. That means you're not only relying on the Olympics to cover the cost. It can be opening the venue to the public or hosting more events there. It's probably best to focus on cities with many existing venues, though.

    The problem is that many of the cities meeting that standard are in the United States. There's a definite IOC bias against the United States, so this isn't an appealing solution. Apparently the United States is no longer good at bribing officials, which is why they lost out on the 2022 World Cup. Never mind, of course, that Qatar has to construct 12 stadiums at immense monetary and human cost while all of the venues in the United States already exist. Many large universities in the United States have venues for their Olympic sports programs, which is an inherent advantage over most other countries.

    People would throw a fit if the Olympics were regularly rotated through the United States every 12 years or so. If the IOC focused on reusing existing venues and required plans to reuse new venues, it would fit into the IOC bribe money. It would also favor countries like the United States, and there are too many people with an anti-American bias to let that happen.

  19. Question.. by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

    Where did it go from green to unsafe?

    I understand that smells like fart is not usually a good thing, but is is just a sulfur emanation without any risk of bacterial infection? I'm nor a good chemist nor biologist, so this is where I stop.

    1. Re: Question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some species of algae produce hydrogen sulfide. The smell is the result of the algae bloom.

    2. Re:Question.. by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 2

      Don't know about the unsafe part, but the decision to dump the pool was partly made to allow the judges and spectators to see the synchronized swimmers in action.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    3. Re:Question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True indeed.

    4. Re:Question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racist "Try to get it. Smart ass blacks tried to get around the need to change waters experimenting with something else. Surprise, surprise, it di not work out. Bottom down, with this olympics fiasco I bet many people will avoid Brazil as a destination for holidays for some years to come."

  20. Re: technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sports shouldn't be out of bounds. There's a lot of interesting technology in use at the Olympics. Many Olympics have had forecast demonstration projects, where competing weather prediction systems are tested against each other. The use of technology to improve officiating is quite relevant. The US collected three years worth of data on the sailing venue to try to improve their performance. The US field hockey team were fitted with sensors to measure exertion so better substitutions could be made. More generally, analytics are being extremely common in sports and nerds are taking over the management positions. And don't get me started on the ridiculously high level of technology in Formula One. This story just isn't that interesting, but there's a lot of sports technology that belongs here.

    By the way, Ice Road Truckers is on the History Channel, where it doesn't belong, but if done right, it could be a good program for the Discovery Channel. If the focus was on the harsh conditions and the weather, the unique places that truckers go in the far north, the way of life for those people, and really following the season in a particular locale, it would be great for the Discovery Channel. The real issue is that nearly all of the recent seasons have focused on the drama between truckers and not the real issues with driving trucks on ice roads and the winter roads. The early seasons of IRT and the first season of Deadliest Roads, filmed in the Himalayas, were far better. Maybe it isn't really science, but learning about how the challenges with delivering supplies to remote locales and the geography really is interesting.

    I believe that people should diversify their knowledge beyond their immediate area of interest. I understand the need for specialization, but people need to expand their knowledge to other areas.

    I'm also really tired of the frequent stories about Hillary's emails and the stupid comments that ensue. There's not going to be any new information that's relevant here. But I'd be far more interested in statistical analysis of the polls and election prediction, which is certainly nerdy.

  21. Re: LOL! Serves them right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have no problem with new venues being built, provided there's a plan to use them afterwards. That means you're not only relying on the Olympics to cover the cost. It can be opening the venue to the public or hosting more events there.

    Spot on. It's irrelevant if the venue doesn't break even during the 4 weeks that the Olympics and Paralympics is on. The benefits to the economy as a whole are much more relevant.

    London has hosted the games during three Olympiads. The latest one was in 2012. The Olympic Park was built on pretty much a waste land in East London (the poor bit). Westfield built a shopping mall next to the site. That was so popular, they had to restrct access to olympic ticket holders while the games were on to prevent overcrowding. The amount of tourists wishing to pump money in to the UK Economy was so immense that they literally couldn't cope with the demand. This was true of other places in London. Hotels, tourist attractions, etc. On top of that, it raised the profile of the country potentially attracting more tourists for many years to come.

    Now the Olympic Park is transformed. The swimming pool is a public swimming pool, and the velodrome is now a public velodrome. The athletics stadium was sold to a local soccer club and is being transformed in to a soccer stadium. The athletes' village is now apartments. The whole area has massively helped with the regeneration that's been transforming what was a very deprived area 20 years ago. All of this far outweighs the revenue from the park over 4 weeks whilst the games were on.

    London first hosted the Olympics 108 years ago. Still we're seeing the benefits of that today. The athletic stadium remained an athletics stadium for decades. The area in which it was built was transformed from what was mostly fields into a large suburb of its own. The stadium was demolished and BBC Television Centre was built on the land. A new stadium was built just down the road where it remains today. As the BBC was moving out of Television Centre, Westfield built a shopping mall (see a pattern here), the centre was turned in to apartments and the local economy has boosted.

    In fact the only London Olympic Games that hasn't had a lasting impact is probably the only ones that did break even in those few weeks. In 1948, they were hosted on a small budget (what with the war having demolished the country's net worth). The athletics were held in the pre-existing Wembly stadium, and that area is as impoverished now as it was then.

    TL;DR An Olympic City which only breaks even during the games is probably much less likely to benefit the city long term than one which makes a loss.

  22. Chemical feeders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why pools today, especially those used at such events, come with automated systems where the water is constantly monitored and chemicals are injected automatically as needed. I mean, WTF is a pool-boy doing manually chucking stuff into the water anyway?

    1. Re:Chemical feeders? by ruir · · Score: 0

      It is a rather large cultural problem... Latin cultures do not value specialisation and prefer to employ friends or family, or whoever gives the best "reward", or cut corners and money, or all together, over seasoned professionals.

    2. Re:Chemical feeders? by Clsid · · Score: 1

      Or things like specialized machinery is so overpriced, hard to find parts, and expensive in Latin America that it is cheaper to pay somebody to do the job. The other part of the problem is that you will have a very hard time finding those seasoned professionals, even if you are willing to pay whatever they ask. Those "seasoned professionals" more often than not turn out to be not so professional after all. More likely you will have to hire somebody somewhat responsible and just train them.

      The whole friends and family thing applies more to government, and the same deficiencies I see over here, I was able to see in the DMV offices in the US or places like the library of Congress, where internal infighting was very similar that what you would find at any public office here.

      The only "cultural problem" I see is with people that think that their shit does not stink, or keep repeating phrases like "first world problems", as if they were Donald Trump or something. Just because you grew up in a fancy neighborhood/country does not give you the right to piss on everybody else like a spoiled teenager.

    3. Re:Chemical feeders? by ruir · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I grew up and live in a Latin country, and I am speaking from the voice of experience. Specialisation *and* experience is not valued, and the sad thing is we are with a severe brain drain of IT specialists *and* specially medical specialists can have an upgrade from 3 to 10 times their salary going the Europe/UK route. Excuse me, but having lived in the UJ, I am more than capable of saying you have no idea what you are talking about comparing the US to Latin countries. The disorganisation and lack of planning is amplified several orders of magnitude.

  23. This is what is expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you do a high profile event in a country run by monkeys.

  24. Re: LOL! Serves them right! by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    It's not easy to send bribe money directly from the public coffers to the IOC officials. But if that money gets funnelled through, say, a construction company...

    Seriously, I have no idea how or even if the IOC guys are bribed regularly. What I do know is that when assloads of public money is being spent on one-off projects, usually there is money changing hands under the table all along the chain.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  25. Re: LOL! Serves them right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4. Profit!!!

  26. What kind of pool boy did they have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In a venue as big as the Olympics. I am wondering how Rio support people couldn't manage to have a knowledgeable staff to maintain the pools? Nothing to me seems more important for achievement then proper equipment. Rio seems to have suffered in many areas from ineffective staffing and maintenance. It's pretty scary when you have Police riding around with automatic rifles and swat gear. I think the Olympic committee needs a better way of choosing a host for the Olympics. Maybe based on existing facilities rather than expecting a host to build so much infrastructure.

    1. Re:What kind of pool boy did they have? by Clsid · · Score: 1

      Because in Latin America, it is very common to hire somebody that seems to be totally qualified for something, and then it turns out they really did not know their stuff that well. I also think the Olympic Committee should have a way to make a country lose the right to host, if things are not ready like 2 months before or something. So that when a host is selected, a backup host with a country that has most of the stuff ready can be selected. That would be a way more effective way to pressure a host to get their act together.

      As for the police with automatic rifles, well, when you have criminal gangs hanging around with handguns that have extended magazines (and behave like uzis), grenades and other stuff, it is better to be armed to the teeth. Besides, in any country when there is a threat to security, be it France, China, etc what you will see out there is heavily armed police or military. I saw troops in the Charles de Gaulle airport and other parts of Paris with FAMAS rifles everywhere.

  27. Red colors by DrYak · · Score: 1

    We should have red pools and purple pools as well { ...} and pinks

    You joke, but there *are* actually red algae that could give warm colours to pool watter.
    It's just about waiting that the correct olympic blunders happens....

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  28. Re: The wet dream for the dorks here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either that, or its because the Olympics is a total sham and operated by one of the most corrupt organizations in the world.

  29. Re: technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah really, Chemestry? ...Boorrriiiiing

  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. Why avoid the beach by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Brazil has nice big beaches, full of topless chicks, covering up their butts with shoestring bikinis. Why would anyone want to go to a pool at all . . . ?

    Because last time I checked they weren't handing out Olympic diving medals on the beach. I'm pretty sure the "topless chicks" are not much of a draw to the female divers or the gay male divers so there's that too...

    1. Re:Why avoid the beach by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1, Troll

      How about a new competition: "Beach Strip Volleyball" . . . ?

      Each side starts with ten players, and when the ball doesn't get over the net, the last person to touch the ball must take off a piece of clothing. Naked folks get tossed off the court, when they make an error, so the folks on the court dwindle down.

      Now that would be a sport that I would watch!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Why avoid the beach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you remove the Naked people? That's the whole reason for watching such a sport.

    3. Re:Why avoid the beach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the "topless chicks" are not much of a draw to the female divers or the gay male divers so there's that too...

      Oh please...

      Nobody's THAT gay.

    4. Re:Why avoid the beach by unixisc · · Score: 1

      In that case, when the ball doesn't go over the net, the last person to touch the ball, his team remains fully clothed, while everyone else in the opposing team takes off a piece of clothing. In other words, winning is losing

  32. Re:technology? by tomhath · · Score: 0

    How is this appropriate for slashdot instead of a tabloid at the supermarket?

    Same thing. Except slashdot has more advertisements for SpaceX

  33. Good chemists needed by methano · · Score: 4, Informative

    Over the last 15 years, good chemists all over the world have been losing their jobs. Wages have been stagnant for 20 years. Those MBA types keep thinking any jackass can be hired to do the job. Well, this is what happens when you hire a jackass to do chemistry. You get green pools to put out for the whole freaking world to see. And you end up looking cheap and stupid. Well, us chemists are laughing our asses off while we stand in the unemployment line.

    1. Re:Good chemists needed by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      So you went through 4+ years of college to be a pool boy?

      I would have thought there would be more exciting work, like in pharmaceuticals, food industry (the next next Coca-Cola), or even defense (materials science and such).

    2. Re:Good chemists needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * an UNEMPLOYED pool boy

      * the next Coca-Cola is actually defense pharmaceuticals, the most unexciting non-honest work available

    3. Re:Good chemists needed by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      Those MBA types keep thinking any jackass can be hired to do the job. Well, this is what happens when you hire a jackass to do chemistry. You get green pools to put out for the whole freaking world to see. And you end up looking cheap and stupid. Well, us chemists are laughing our asses off while we stand in the unemployment line.

      While I agree with you about the plight of chemists in recent years (I have a friend in the field who was laid off recently), I also think that pool management doesn't really require complex chemistry. There are just a handful of common chemicals used in pools, and they all have very specific ways they should be used (and ways they should NOT be used, as in this instance). Idiot-proof testing strips, etc. are available to make sure you get concentrations right, etc.

      Millions of people without degrees in chemistry somehow manage to keep their home pools clean and not green, and millions of other pools are serviced by people who don't have chemistry degrees.

      Should the Olympics have a trained chemist available to test the water and make sure things are ready? Sure. In a high-profile situation like this where precision is required for an international competition, obviously you want somebody with adequate training to be checking water quality.

      And maybe they did hire somebody, but the "trained chemist" was an idiot with a chemistry degree from the worst school but hired on the cheap by some corrupt government official. Or maybe the "trained chemist" wasn't paying attention to his/her job. Or maybe the "trained chemist" was circumvented when somebody else on the athletic management team had a "bright idea" to get the pool more "sparkling clean" and added hydrogen peroxide without consulting other people. There are lots of possible issues here.

      Anyhow, while I agree with you that they should have had a good chemist (particularly given water quality issues in Rio in general), I also just want to point out that this error is something that doesn't require a degree in chemistry to spot. Anyone who knows anything about pool treatment (even some high-school dropout who's been working at a pool treatment company for a week) should have been able to point out the stupidity of what happened here.

    4. Re:Good chemists needed by Ogive17 · · Score: 1, Informative

      I guess we should round up all MBAs and make them wear patches and all live together in a ghetto, right? That will solve all the problems.

      I'm an engineer with an MBA. Nothing in my studies ever suggested to cut corners for short term profits. It was focused on long term growth strategies and employee development. To remain globally competitive you have to build from within. The companies that are off shoring functions will most likely find themselves in more trouble a few years down the road. Yes, there's a cost analysis that is done (and I do that daily as an engineer). Would I pay someone $60k+/year to add chlorine to a pool? Probably not.

      Wages are often tied to supply and demand. It's unfortunate that STEM related salaries in the US have not trended with inflation but that's a result of a stronger global workforce. It's not the MBAs deliberately holding down salaries.

      Sorry that you have trouble finding a job.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  34. I assumed Michael Phelps by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 0

    spilled his bong in the pool again...

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  35. OH IT WASN'T ZIKA!??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't 'murican media tell everyone the pool smelled like zika and farts, though? Lol.

  36. Re:The wet dream for the dorks here by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    We saw Brazilian domination in the shooting events, including over the vaunted Team USA. Though people expected an early Brazilian lead in mugging pairs, Ryan Lochte's humiliating defeat in mugging fours was something none of us anticipated.

  37. No its not.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "is a weak acid"

    1. Re:No its not.... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      No, not weak at all - unless it's diluted by the water of an Olympic sized swimming pool.

  38. Re: Whatever Color by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brazilians are not very smart when it comes to water.
    Let's be frank. They dump their shit in it.

  39. Awesome! by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    So now all the swimmers and divers are platinum blonde?

  40. How it went down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This pool is a little low. It needs some H20 added. This other pool needs some H20, too."

  41. Re: LOL! Serves them right! by dwillden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Exactly,
    Look at Utah (where the games made a profit), all our venues are in use year round. and the village became student housing at the University of Utah as planned. During the winter athletes train and compete at the venues but they are also open to the public to enjoy and try out which serves to recruit new athletes to some of the more obscure events (Lake Placid is the home to the only other bob sled and luge track in the country). And during the summer we find uses for the venues as well. The Ski Jump landing slopes became mega water slides during the summer.

    The problem is when host cities throw money at getting the games with no plans beyond the closing ceremonies of the Paralympic games. We not only made a profit during the games but had plans for maintaining and using the venues afterwards.

    --
    I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  42. Chemistry is not an exact science by Dust038 · · Score: 1

    This coming from the same people that think Chemistry is not an exact science. It is not surprise to me. Quote: “We first learned that chemistry is not an exact science,” Rio 2016 spokesman Mario Andrada told the AP Friday. Citation: http://time.com/4451260/rio-20...

  43. Re:technology? by Clsid · · Score: 1

    You need to go read Scientific American. If you don't like a news source for whatever reason, just take it off your list and don't get angry. Now if you own said organization, then you can do something about it and get angry. Otherwise it makes you look like a crazy person.

  44. Poo Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "organic compounds" = poo

  45. Re: Whatever Color by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real issue is the complete ineptitude of the IOC and their inability to get their story straight.

    The IOC is used to a culture of hiding things. Everything seems so pretty when bad stuff is swept under the rug. Which is why they can't deal properly with cheaters taking illegal substances - better pretend it didn't happen.

    In this case it backfired. If they simply stated that some bonehead used the wrong chemical - and then replaced the water, well it'd be a boring story - quickly forgotten. Instead they got people talking about it, pool hobbyists offering all sorts of explanations, some of them scary.

  46. Hosting the games by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Because in Latin America, it is very common to hire somebody that seems to be totally qualified for something, and then it turns out they really did not know their stuff that well.

    You would think for something like the Olympics they might be able to dig up someone who knows how to treat a swimming poll correctly. You would thing FINA might have had the topic come up once or twice.

    I also think the Olympic Committee should have a way to make a country lose the right to host, if things are not ready like 2 months before or something. So that when a host is selected, a backup host with a country that has most of the stuff ready can be selected.

    Why would any country agree to be a backup host? They're supposed to spend millions of dollars getting ready for an event that will probably never happen? It's not like the IOC would pay for it. And realistically there really is maybe 2-3 countries who could host something the scale of the Olympics on short notice. The US could do it most easily. Maybe a few countries in western Europe (UK, Germany, France). Maybe Russia or China. Canada for the winter games. But really there just aren't a lot of places with the infrastructure in place already and I can't see them agreeing to the hassle realistically.

    I think what really should happen is that there should either be a permanent home for the Olympics (how about Greece?) or a rotating set of cities with already established infrastructure. Spending billions that will never be recouped on a one time sporting event is idiotic.

  47. Scapegoating by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm an engineer with an MBA.

    As am I. I went to business school concurrently with my engineering masters to learn how to better manage the projects I work on. Frankly there are a lot of bitter engineers here on Slashdot that are looking for a scapegoat for what they perceive (sometimes rightly) as injustices in the workplace. Blaming "MBAs" is their modern version of blaming Jews or moneylenders as an easily demonized group that in reality has little or nothing to do with the actual problems. It's just tribal scapegoating. There are just as many incompetent engineers as there are incompetent business majors. I run into both almost daily.

    I treat anyone who blames "MBAs" with a sort of corollary to Godwin's law. As a discussion progresses the probability of some idiot scapegoating "MBAs" for a problem approaches 1. If they blame MBAs for a problem they no longer have a reasoned argument to make based on actual facts and so they lose the argument and the discussion is over.

    Nothing in my studies ever suggested to cut corners for short term profits. It was focused on long term growth strategies and employee development. To remain globally competitive you have to build from within.

    This is 100% true. I remember several case studies being used to highlight the dangers of seeking short term profits through financial engineering. The professors took substantial pains to show how short term profit seeking will often backfire long term and damage a company.

    The companies that are off shoring functions will most likely find themselves in more trouble a few years down the road.

    I've actually done some work in global sourcing and I can confirm this anecdotally. Offshoring tends to result in all sorts of management headaches and quality problems. Send work to China and you'd better have someone actually in China to keep an eye on things. I had a client some years ago who blew up their supply chain and sent work all over the place and only then realized that it caused all sorts of quality, logistics and lead time problems. Not to mention that shipping parts halfway around the world often eats away much of the savings.

    1. Re:Scapegoating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and no. I too am an engineer and ran my own consulting business for many years so I have been on both sides as well as having a front row seat to many companies struggling after a "rockstar" MBA CEO pumped up short term profits at the expense of long term viability. While there are many good MBAs out there, many who were originally engineers, there are also many bad MBAs out there, primarily those who are only MBAs. The continual parade of once proud tech companies whose CEO chooses to fire half the company and outsource to China and then golden parachutes in 5 or 6 years just before the company crashes and burns after $20M a year bonuses for record profits is virtually unending and very damaging to the workforce and the country as a whole. This sociopathic behavior performed exclusively by MBAs is destroying the country one company at a time. This is the problem that most engineers have with MBAs.

      The solution I have seen proposed is a federal law that outlaws golden parachutes and requires all executive level management pay in excess of $500k/year (or 5x the median pay for that company, or some other high but reasonable pay rate) to be paid in impounded stock for any company that does business in the US. The impounded stock is released to the payee at 10% per year, rolling forward. After 10 years the CEO/CFO/CTO etc. would be completely paid for his first year at the company, and he/she would have a vested interest in the long term growth and stability of the business, or his earnings might evaporate. This would force management to discontinue the sociopathic slash and burn corporate raider mentality.

    2. Re:Scapegoating by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      That's attributed more to greed and activist investors than MBAs. Yeah, I'm sure some are MBAs.. and some are not. The assumption that every decision that results in lost jobs is due to an MBA in a suit seeking to pump up profits is silly.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  48. Leprechaun at Rio by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    I wish they still made those Warwick Davis Leprechaun movies. They could totally have an olympics one, where he dissolves some gold thief in the pool. OMFG, gold thief! The Leprechaun could be in the olympics, and he's pissed that other contestants are winning "his" gold medals. It's perfect; the movie writes itself.

    But the last two (no, the last three, but especially the "Hood" ones) totally sucked, so I understand why they don't make 'em anymore. My friends and I were so pissed that the "Hood" ones sucked; within just a few minutes of trying to get over our disappointment after watching the first one, were were making up limerick-raps way better than anything in the movie. Those bastards put in so little effort in the end, and why they made "back 2 tha hood" I can't begin to imagine. Sigh.

    So anyway, Warwick, tell your agent that you're up for doing another, but only if they'll do a good job, like in Leprechaun 3 (total classic, best of the series!).

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  49. Re:technology? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    OK, I'll bite.

    > Did you know that you can make your own hydroponic garden using pop bottles, hydroton clay pellets and an 8 dollar aquarium air pump allowing low income families to grow things like chives in their basic current windows even in winter allowing them to supplement their diet with healthy organic food?

    Nope. Link to details?

    > Did you know that if you purchase a 20 foot long board from rona that you can create a geodesic dome frame out of that by cutting it into at least 2 peices per board with little waste left over. This has advantages over a shipping container in that you cannot get a large truck into certain areas due to power lines and piece meal over time is more practical than lump sum for most people.

    Nope. What's the purpose of this? Storage? Sorry, your description isn't quite clear.

    > Did you know that by utilizing a fresnel lense you can heat salt to 800 degrees and combined with magnesium and antimony you can create a molten salt battery capable of far outperforming a standard car battery in terms of storage. When combined with a verticlal wind turbine created by cutting a standard plastic barrel in half you can reduce your energy bill radically?

    Nope. Sounds like an interesting project. Details?

  50. Could have been worse by PPH · · Score: 1

    They could have turned red.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  51. Re: Whatever Color by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    Um, no. This is basically putting your fingers in your ears and yelling la-la-la-la-la to avoid hearing the actual science.

    Unfortunately, there are too many knee-jerk reactions like yours that are based on an ignorance of science.

    Well, according to the Brazilian official Mario Andrada, "..chemistry is not an exact science". Direct quote.
    Bottom line, agreed upon by many experts: they screwed up what should've been a fairly straightforward fix - algaecide and chlorine, not hydrogen peroxide.
    How many other Olympic pools have had this issue in the past 25 years?

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  52. Brazil rushed and missed the deadline by PmanAce · · Score: 1

    These games just shows how badly organized Brazil is/were to prepare these games. I see this in software development all the time, when a project is badly organized, things are late, patched up and rushed. The end result is visible when released with numerous bugs and shortcomings.

    --
    Tired of my customary (Score:1)
  53. Secret Chemical + Pee = Green Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When no one was looking, I put a Pee-Detection chemical in the pool water. I thought it would be funny to catch the occasional swimmer peeing by the green watercloud forming around their crotch. What I did not know was that there was already enough pee in the water to turn the entire pool green. Maybe the bathrooms are a long way away, and all those cameras and attention does make people nervous.....

    My Bad. Sorry.

  54. You don't dump chemicals into modern pools by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    Disclosure: My father-in-law maintains the pools at a local University.

    This isn't like maintaining your above-ground backyard pool whereby you dump chemicals in by the bucket. These modern pools are computer controlled and have constant monitoring by the systems. As the system detects a change in PH or other imbalance, it automatically adjusts what chemicals are needed to be added. For 99% of maintenance it's about topping off the chemicals in the containers that the system draws from. These pools aren't that heavily used compared to those of a waterpark or other community pool which have hundreds (or thousands) of people in them on a given day.

    Another example of how Rio screwed up.

  55. A lie and an excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    First of all, why would they have all this peroxide just sorta "lying around" for someone to "mistakenly use" in the pool.

    This isn't a normal chemical to keep around pools. Ask your local pool to see if they have these types of chemicals around.

    Second, why would somebody dump in vast quantities of H2O2 without a signed order from whoever runs the pool?

    The reality is almost certainly this:

    1) The pool was under filtered and under-pumped

    2) The pool staff almost certainly didn't understand how to backwash the sand filter at the pool (sand is common in commercial pools)

    3) The staff did not do a good job of maintaining pH

    4) Nobody was adding chlorine

    The result was the mess you see. It's a CLASSIC problem for people who don't maintain their pools regularly and properly.

    1. Re:A lie and an excuse by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      It's a normal chemical to have around in this case (huge public pools). It neutralizes chlorine (as in this case). Too much chlorine is bad for people, so neutralizing excess is important. And it's hard to know how much chlorine you'll need, because sweat and such cause it to decay. So in case of a situation where they'll need to reduce the chlorine rapidly, they'd need hydrogen peroxide.

      And there's not going to be a signed work order. Because the measurements are supposed to indicate what chemicals to add, and tit's part of the daily job. After all, there' no signed work order to specifically swap out the urinal cakes, it's just a job.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  56. MBA is a degree, not a class of people by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I have been on both sides as well as having a front row seat to many companies struggling after a "rockstar" MBA CEO pumped up short term profits at the expense of long term viability.

    I can show you even more examples of individuals who never went to business school doing EXACTLY the same thing.

    While there are many good MBAs out there, many who were originally engineers, there are also many bad MBAs out there, primarily those who are only MBAs.

    MBA is a degree. There is no such thing as a person who is "only MBA". Every one of them has an undergraduate degree in something and most people who earn that degree have several years of experience before they get it. Often business but more often something else. My class had people who had undergrad degrees in film, sociology, engineering, various sciences, IT, medicine, and lots more. There were of course finance, accounting and marketing majors too. We had a few professional athletes as well. All but a handful had at least 4-5 years working experience prior to B-school. I worked as an engineer prior to and after B-school.

    The continual parade of once proud tech companies whose CEO chooses to fire half the company and outsource to China and then golden parachutes in 5 or 6 years just before the company crashes and burns after $20M a year bonuses for record profits is virtually unending and very damaging to the workforce and the country as a whole. This sociopathic behavior performed exclusively by MBAs is destroying the country one company at a time.

    Complete load of crap that what you describe is "performed exclusively by MBAs". Demonstrably untrue. Some people with a corporate raider mentality have a MBA degree. Many others do not. Having an MBA does not make one a corporate raider any more than having an engineering degree makes one an autistic introvert.

    This would force management to discontinue the sociopathic slash and burn corporate raider mentality.

    No it wouldn't. It would just change where they do it from and how they do it. They would start basing companies outside the US or change the type of payment or pull other shenanigans. I don't have a problem in principle with your ideas about aligning management pay with long term corporate prosperity but there is no silver bullet on that. It's pretty hard to legislate morality.

    1. Re:MBA is a degree, not a class of people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. The CEO tactic of slash and burn the work force to pump up profits is done at the CEO level, and I have yet to see a CEO who does this who was a founder of the company (which is the only way to be a CEO without an MBA). CEOs who do this fit a profile. They have an MBA from Harvard or another ivy league school, and are brought in after the founder(s) of the company leave or are forced out/bought out. I would love for you to point out 5 CEOs current or past who did a slash and burn who did not have an MBA.
      2. By solo MBA I mean they did not have a degree in a field that is productive (i.e. engineer, biochem, any other applied science). The slash and burn CEOs come with a BS in business or accounting or underwater basketweaving (poly sci etc.) almost exclusively. People who have done productive work in their lives have a better handle on the day to day reality of what it takes to produce a product and the humanity of the workers involved. Thus they are extremely unlikely to slash and burn and the only time you will see layoffs from them is to save the company from insolvency.
      3. In the proposed solution, this requirement is for businesses who do business in the US. Companies who don't like this can take their business and their products elsewhere, but if you want to do business in the US, you have to play by our rules. And really, if a company moves offshore because of this rule, they deserve to be cut off from the largest market on the planet. But what would be the justification, we are not talking about reducing CEO pay, just making sure that they have the best interest of the company in mind. By the way, this also serves long term stock holders, as the CEO is highly motivated to ensure long term profitability and growth.

  57. THE NEW FBI SLASHDOT POOL CHEMICALS CHAPTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what we needed THANKS.

    Can we buy the paperback from Softpedia?

  58. Re: LOL! Serves them right! by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Isn't Qatar - and other Middle Eastern OPEC countries - the only ones who can then afford to host the Olympics outside the US? Since they have money to burn, and this, while not completely productive, is more useful than funnelling cash to Sunni rebels in Syria

  59. Re: Whatever Color by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before the Olympics, Brazilians have never heard of the word "chlorine".
    That's how inexperienced they are with water management.
    They enjoy swimming in their own shit.

  60. Re: LOL! Serves them right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would much rather Qatar burn its oil windfall money on Olympics than on funding ISIS and other "moderate" rebels in Syria. At least wasting the money on Olympic stadiums does not kill thousands of people like is happening in Syria

  61. Re:LOL! Serves them right! by hucker75 · · Score: 0

    And in the UK we waste millions of lottery money on sports instead of giving it to charities like they were supposed to. Since when did sport become a charity?

  62. Re: Whatever Color by hucker75 · · Score: 0

    Algae isn't dangerous, plenty people swim outdoors. You don't need to chlorinate what you swim in.