Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Offered To Install Marketers' Apps Directly On Subscribers' Phones (adage.com)

According to a report on AdAge, Verizon Wireless is trying to add more bloatware to Android phones by installing apps from other companies in exchange for payment. From the report: The wireless carrier has offered to install big brands' apps on its subscribers' home screens, potentially delivering millions of downloads, according to agency executives who have considered making such deals for their clients. But that reach would come at a cost: Verizon was seeking between $1 and $2 for each device affected, executives said. Verizon started courting advertisers with app installations late last year, pitching retail and finance brands among others, agency executives said. It has only offered the installations on Android phones, because Google's software is open for carriers to customize. Apple controls its platform more tightly. The proposed deals with brands ensure that their apps download to only new devices when consumers activate the phones and their software for the first time.

198 comments

  1. I really do think by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 2

    That Google should force all Android phones to be unlocked, and no contract, even if they have to change the license.

    1. Re:I really do think by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      Well, if they were truly talking about Android phones... I'll explain:

      First, see, the first image shown in the article itself. Then note that it has the following caption: "Verizon has offered to install marketers' brands directly on new Android subscribers' phones, according to agency executives. Credit: Courtesy Verizon"

      Don't you just love advertising execs?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:I really do think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then the manufactors would drop Android, their customers demand locks, end-of-story. And in case of Verizon, there are only two types of Phones on CDMA, the ones the carrier sells, and the ones that cant be used...

    3. Re:I really do think by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Why should Google do that? It would only sell fewer phones that way.

      It's really the responsibility of the consumer to get a an unlocked Android phone with no contract. The consumer has that option already.

    4. Re:I really do think by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      As long as carriers are customizing Android, they're going to find a way to fill it with bloatware and crapware that they can monetize. And if history is any judge, you may not be able to delete it. I'm sure most of us remember the early days of carrier preinstalled apps you can't remove, of AT&T forcing your search to Yahoo instead of Google, etc etc

      Say what you will about Apple, the last story in this vein that we heard was about Apple discussing making fewer apps uninstallable, not more, or selling "push" app installations.

    5. Re:I really do think by tripleevenfall · · Score: 2

      Customers do not demand locked phones. Most are too ignorant of what locked means to even care.

    6. Re:I really do think by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I think ACs point was that Verizon is the manufacturer's customer, not the end user.

    7. Re:I really do think by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      How much profit does Google make on each Android phone sold?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    8. Re:I really do think by fustakrakich · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How much profit does Google make on each Android phone sold?

      Probably less than Microsoft

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    9. Re:I really do think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if only i could REMOVE, not hide, that U2 stupidity.

    10. Re:I really do think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      no, customers do not "demand" locked phones.. they DO however, demand the gimmicky handset giveaways and other promotions, and *that* is what "demands" a locked phone to keep the phone on carrier for the duration of whatever contract requirement the carriers throw at it..

      what you SHOULD be saying is that hardware and service should be separated.

      hardware should cost what hardware costs.. a couple hundred usd, at minimum, for all but the cheapest devices.. unlocked and not carrier specific. a cdma should work on either cdma provider, a gsm should work on any gsm for voice and any carrier for data,

      services should cost what service costs... which is, a hell of a lot less than it does now due to it currently subsidizing hardware promos,

      "smart phone" mandatory surcharges and data plans HAVE TO GO. ever hear of wifi-only data? no? it's entirely feasible, preferred even by many.. but carriers don't want you to have a smart phone that only does wifi data.

      and the software ON the hardware needs to be supported and updated with security and bug fixes for the life of the hardware.. at least 7-10 years or more.. so you can jump off the upgrade train, keep a good device long-term, and do the environment a favor.

    11. Re:I really do think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By last count, it was less than half what Microsoft made. $13 per phone to MS, about $6 in advertising revenue over two years to Google.

    12. Re:I really do think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as carriers are customizing Android, they're going to find a way to fill it with bloatware and crapware that they can monetize. And if history is any judge, you may not be able to delete it. I'm sure most of us remember the early days of carrier preinstalled apps you can't remove, of AT&T forcing your search to Yahoo instead of Google, etc etc

      Say what you will about Apple, the last story in this vein that we heard was about Apple discussing making fewer apps uninstallable, not more, or selling "push" app installations.

      This ain't an Android issue, but the fact that Android (Google) allows this. Much like Apple's walled garden makes it difficult to load apps from elsewhere, but keeps the overall eco system safe for non geeks compared to Android's wild west complete with robber gangs coaxing you into their "nice" app.

      Slashdot forces my browser into mobile, so there will be no more user posts. Et tu, Brute?

    13. Re: I really do think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Updated software requires retesting for FCC certification which costs money. Who will pay that?

    14. Re: I really do think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can. Apple changed the issue after the backlash. There was (still is?) a method for removing it.

    15. Re:I really do think by tripleevenfall · · Score: 0

      Much like Apple's walled garden makes it difficult to load apps from elsewhere

      Difficult, meaning, a checkbox

    16. Re:I really do think by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      no, customers do not "demand" locked phones.. they DO however, demand the gimmicky handset giveaways and other promotions, and *that* is what "demands" a locked phone to keep the phone on carrier for the duration of whatever contract requirement the carriers throw at it..

      Verizon doesn't lock most of their phones and the ones that they do lock, they will unlock for you without too much of a hassle.

      http://www.verizon.com/about/c...

      what you SHOULD be saying is that hardware and service should be separated.

      Most carriers are allowing customers to have a 0% financing for their phones that are separate from the service. You can pay off the phone and move to another service or you can bring a compatible phone to their service.

      hardware should cost what hardware costs.. a couple hundred usd, at minimum, for all but the cheapest devices.. unlocked and not carrier specific. a cdma should work on either cdma provider, a gsm should work on any gsm for voice and any carrier for data,

      Most phones support LTE and work with GSM or CDMA. A GSM only LTE phone won't work with a CDMA carrier if it can't get an LTE signal. Then you have an issue with some phones don't support all of the LTE bands.

      But CDMA sucks and only used by a few carriers worldwide.

      services should cost what service costs... which is, a hell of a lot less than it does now due to it currently subsidizing hardware promos,

      Phone carriers in the U.S. have moved away from subsidized plans toward service + (optional) finance plans. You can pay for the phone up front and just pay for service.

      "smart phone" mandatory surcharges and data plans HAVE TO GO. ever hear of wifi-only data? no? it's entirely feasible, preferred even by many.. but carriers don't want you to have a smart phone that only does wifi data.

      http://get.tracfone.com/smartp...

      Plans do come with limited data but it's only $15/month. If you spend most of your time on wifi. There are plenty of free/low cost VOIP apps that include a phone number.

      and the software ON the hardware needs to be supported and updated with security and bug fixes for the life of the hardware.. at least 7-10 years or more.. so you can jump off the upgrade train, keep a good device long-term, and do the environment a favor.

      7 or 10 years support for phone? These were the top of the line phones in 2006:
      http://www.cnet.com/news/best-...

    17. Re:I really do think by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I don't see how that's relevant. If Google antagonizes some of the carriers, that will just fragment the mobile space even more, because those carriers will just find a different OS that allows them to install whatever crapware they want on it (for instance: Tizen, CyanogenMod, Windows Phone, etc.).

    18. Re:I really do think by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Well it does look a lot like this phone, which is a Windows 10 branded android phone.

    19. Re:I really do think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I am NOT an Anonymous Coward, I am discreet. Verizon will hear from me on this topic. After discovering that cell fees are far lower in Europe than in the USA, I am in NO mood to suffer ads and bloatware unless, perhaps, Verizon cuts my bill. I've endured enough greed for several life times from these companies. They make enormous profits on the back of their staff and the rest of us. This latest indignity of foisting apps without my permission is just too much.

  2. If I can delete them. I don't care by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    If on the other hand I can't, the phone's going to get unlocked and rooted. All carriers should take note - we're getting closer to a discontinuity in how much we're willing to be abused.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's the PC industry all over again. Kickbacks for crapware, installed by default. Permanent product placement on your app screen and no option to remove it.
      The last Lenovo laptop I bought wasn't able to play Skyrim because crapware kept getting in the way and stealing focus, locking up the GPU.

      Now it's a race to see who is going to root the device first - the malvertisers with root certs or the users with jailbreaks.

    2. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by geek · · Score: 3, Informative

      If on the other hand I can't, the phone's going to get unlocked and rooted. All carriers should take note - we're getting closer to a discontinuity in how much we're willing to be abused.

      So what happens when Verizon pushes out a malware infested app that roots your device?

    3. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      One small problem I can see (well, three...)

      First, most folks can't even spell "Cyanogen", let alone root/mod their phones.

      Second, of those that can, most will not think it worth the effort, for fear of bricking their pricey subsidized phones. Easier/faster to disable the app in question and remove all references/shortcuts to it outside of the App Manager.

      Third, telcos can retaliate. A more extreme example would be adding language to their little contracts that say something like "For security purposes, if the user installs or modified the operating system without consent or permission from EvilTelco Inc: all warranties will be null and void, and the phone will be forcibly disconnected from the network until such time as the user replaces the phone with an approved one from EvilTelco, or brings/sends it to EvilTelco for repairs at the user's full cost. Note that all unpaid balances accrued towards the purchase/subsidy of that phone will remain in force."

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    4. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by ls671 · · Score: 2

      we're getting closer to a discontinuity in how much we're willing to be abused.

      Hehehe, the plan is to do it slowly so the bar raises as slowly without anybody noticing. It has been going on for ever.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    5. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2

      At which point any judge that knows what the magnusson moss warranty act is would throw out that whole section of the contract. Also gotcha-clauses like that are rarely enforceable because they lack adequate consideration and there's no meeting of the minds.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    6. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      I never thought I would be saying this but the Microsoft Store -- both online and the brick stores -- is a great shopping experience. They sell computers from a number of brands without crapware and they are the same prices if not cheaper than the crapware version.

      I bought a Dell 2-n-1 Inspiron from there recently. I never thought I would be able to buy a clean Dell consumer computer.

    7. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      "f the user installs or modified the operating system without consent or permission from EvilTelco Inc: all warranties will be null and void,"

      Magnusson-Moss act would take a huge dump right on top of this.

      --
      Good-bye
    8. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Store does not seem to sell any laptops that run Windows 7.

    9. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EULA > Magnusson Moss warranty.

      Contracts (and EULAs are part of them) are first semester law school, and this can be done because the phone can be sold... but access to any cellular network can be licensed any way the carrier feels like it. In fact, it wasn't until recently that Sprint wouldn't allow any device but what they sold onto their network.

      One can look at XBL and Valve's Anti Cheat as examples. It is pretty simple to configure things so that if the network detects a modded phone, it gets banned from the network. I'm amazed that carriers have not started doing this already.

    10. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might as well switch to macOS or Linux then.

    11. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by paiute · · Score: 1

      we're getting closer to a discontinuity in how much we're willing to be abused.

      Said the frogs as the water got warmer.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    12. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by tripleevenfall · · Score: 2

      Verizon figures it out weeks later, rolls out a fix, someone files a class action, Verizon settles for $20 million, $19 million of which goes to lawyers, you get a card in the mail telling you to go to dlksjOIjhdhsf893lk3jhflskhfsdkjh384982.com between the hours of 4 and 5 AM on the second tuesday after the winter solstice to register for your class action payout, and 6 months after that you get a check for $0.16

    13. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They don't have to do this. They know exactly what IMEI/MEID's they've sold for their network. Your phones IMEI/MEID isn't in their database? sorry it wont activate!.

    14. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You actually got the check? Lucky.

    15. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Coren22 · · Score: 0

      https://support.microsoft.com/...

      That would be because Windows 7 has been out of mainstream support (when they actively sell it) for more than a year.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    16. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're capable of following the directions on the web to unlock and root your phone -- that's makes you a very atypical phone customer! Most people are too stupid to understand what their carrier is forcing them to do.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    17. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      https://support.microsoft.com/...

      That would be because Windows 7 has been out of mainstream support (when they actively sell it) for more than a year.

      And whose fault is that? Microsoft's. Let's put the blame where it lies. They want to (not so) slowly move people to OS-as-a-service. Older OSes don't suddenly stop working because they're out of mainstream support. Look at how many people are still running XP without a problem.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    18. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Funny

      Microsoft Store doesn't seem to sell any laptops that run those either.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    19. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checks are still in use? how gauche.

    20. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I would say running XP isn't a problem. Any security updates aren't being backported except extreme situations, so it is just a matter of time before XP will have an unpatched exploit in the wild.

      Do you expect MS to support old OSes forever so that people can fail to move up to the current?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    21. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by MitchDev · · Score: 2

      If MS won't, they should lose the copyright and be forced to to release the Source Code.

      If they won't protect the product with security patches, then they should lose all copyright protection.

    22. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They come with Windows AND without crapware? The two statements are mutually exclusive.

    23. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Did you request the same thing happen to Mac OS 9?

      Should the copyright for Linux 4.6 (and below) be taken away too?

      https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    24. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and some of us have already made significant changes, however until a greater portion of the population does the same the companies have no reason to take note.

      Read your EULAs and if you don't agree, don't buy the product. I know, I know, it requires "reading" which seems to be so complicated for so many people, but if you aren't willing to even know what rights you're losing, you're going to lose them.

      Don't subsidize your phones. There are plenty of cheap smartphones out there that work wonderfully. I have a Kyocera Reach that is pretty damn good as compared to my old S3 and it cost me $70 unsubsidized.

      Use Linux or another OS that you can actually tear into the guts of. You don't need to be an "expert" to do some searching on how to protect your system, it just takes a little bit of elbow grease.

      Use unique email addresses for every account. Yes, it can be a bit time consuming, but the instant someone sells your data and you start getting spam 1) you know who sold your data and 2) you can delete the account and never see spam from them again. Of course, if you use one of the "free" email services you're going to get screwed in other ways, but setting up an email server really isn't all that difficult. Besides, demand for it would afford future opportunities (prebuilt email vms with minimal setup or whatever would not be difficult to assemble and release, for example) for other companies to break into the space by PROTECTING their customers instead of screwing them.

      Your rights are yours until you give them away. If you're willing to give them away for a little bit of convenience then bitching about it here (or anywhere else) isn't going to do you any good. If these assholes are still collecting money from you, your opinion isn't valid.

    25. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contracts (and EULAs are part of them)

      Since there's no consideration involved in a EULA, it is not a contract.

      Example: You buy Microsoft Office at Staples. You pay, then you get Office. You get home, you get a EULA. The EULA is after the transaction, hence no consideration.

      Of course the Rule of Law doesn't apply to the United States, so good luck finding an honest judge to see it that way.

    26. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      If MS won't, they should lose the copyright and be forced to to release the Source Code.

      I'm sure you think you're cute saying that, but it shows you don't know what you're talking about...

    27. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      If they aren't supported anymore, then yes

    28. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by MitchDev · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Found the M$ Shill....

    29. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

      You know what costs not a nickel extra, though? Buying unlocked phones directly from manufacturers and bringing your own device. As a bonus, it also requires no technical knowledge.

      --
      Who did what now?
    30. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by EndlessNameless · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They want to (not so) slowly move people to OS-as-a-service.

      It's not even that.

      Microsoft has discontinued OS sales and then support for years. Much longer than the OS-as-a-service concept has been on their radar.

      With proprietary for-profit software, you will inevitably reach the point where new sales of the software will not cover the cost to maintain the software. And if you're a business, that means it's time to consider killing the product.

      While users and developers both require a stable platform to do their work, the very stability of that platform eliminates the need for new purchases. Just reassign that perpetual license when the hardware dies and carry on. Meanwhile, the developer must support new hardware and new standards, and he must also fix any bugs or exploits.

      Going OS-as-a-service and subsidizing the annual license fee to $0 through the use of analytic and advertising revenue... well, that's one solution. I don't like it, but if people are unwilling to pay for support one way then they will pay another. Microsoft has to make money, and users are generally not interested in paying cash for operating systems.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    31. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EULA is on their web site. It's not hard to read these things in advance if you actually care.

      But if you just want to rant in a way that Slashdot likes, that's even easier.

    32. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyright should expire immediately when software isn't supported any more.

      And as far as that goes, binary-only software should never have been copyrightable in the first place.

    33. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Funny, my understanding is that the frog does jump out before boiling.

      http://conservationmagazine.org/2011/03/frog-fable-brought-to-boil/

    34. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Yes. Yes, they are. So is cash; haven't you heard?

    35. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Cell contracts have ZERO to do with manufacturer's warranties.

      In the United States, it is ILLEGAL to void a warranty because of a third party replacement part or third party service, unless that part or service is provided FOR FREE by the manufacturer. It is ILLEGAL to void a warranty because of an unauthorized modification, unless that modification caused another part to fail.

      And if carriers start locking out phones, you can expect the FCC to get involved, because those carriers are licensed to use the frequencies, and if they start abusing those licenses, they can be taken away and/or carriers can be fined.

      So no. Magnuson-Moss > EULA.

    36. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Found the M$ Shill....

      Anyone who types M$ is a moron who is unable to form a rational thought...

    37. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Microsoft had originally said, when their product activation schemes became too aggressive, that they would release the activation keys of Windows XP when it went out of support. They lied (what else is new?)

      You can still use XP for playing all your old games and applications off-line. The games don't care that the OS is out of support, same as the OS doesn't suddenly develop bit rot. If it develops the clap, you do the same as when it was supported - wipe and reinstall.

      It's the same story for any OS, from any maker. You don't have to install the latest patches - just don't do stupid stuff. Block ads. Use a 3rd party browser. Disable javascript and flash, or use a browser that has neither. Don't go looking for sex on the internet - you never know what you OR your computer will pick up.

      Worse case scenario, use it in a vm.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    38. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      While I would normally agree with you, because freetards are retards, in the case of software that needs activation to reinstall if it develops the clap, it should be legal to break activation if the company is no longer willing to support it. It's no different than buying any other product and having the manufacturer no longer support it - you can always go to a 3rd party for repairs.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    39. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Or maybe, since Microsoft is no longer willing to support it, it should be legal to kill the need for product activation for those users who need to nuke and re-install. Same as when a car company no longer supports a specific car, you don't just throw it out - you get support elsewhere. Otherwise, would you really want to risk buying any vehicle, or any other product, with a 1 year warranty?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    40. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You already have access to as many unique email addresses as you want. Any character in the sender name after a + is ignored, as are any dots.

      So, you can use joeblow@example.com, joe.blow@ example.com, joe.blow+sendername@example.com. Someone sends you an email with the +sendername, you know who the culprit is who sold your email address.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    41. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      1) You can buy phones unlocked at the big box stores.
      2) some jurisdictions require that the phone be unlocked after you've paid it off if it was subsidized.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    42. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Your car and your software are under very different parts of the law...

      That being said, in general I agree with you, I think EULAs have more power than they should...

      However there is a difference between asking for activation to be removed and asking for source code. It is likely that a lot of source in Windows doesn't actually belong to MS, they have licenced it from other people and they don't have permission to release it. In addition, lots of code is shared between various versions of Windows, releasing parts that are still current could be an issue as well.

      Being able to repair stuff you buy vs stuff that you licence would be an interesting legal discussion, sadly it isn't one that likely is going to happen any time soon.

    43. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I always understood they said if they wanted to shutdown the activation servers, they would "release the keys", not that that would happen automatically at the end of the support period. As an example, Microsoft released a "sunset" edition of Money plus when they wanted to shutdown the activation servers for it.

    44. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3) unlocked != rooted

    45. Re: If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um. XP is no longer supported but I just reinstalled it in a vm. It was able to activate and download updates just fine.

      So far MS haven't shown that they'll disable activation or updates.

      If you're that paranoid make a fresh install, grab the updates, activate then image too your backup server so you can restore if it goes titsup.

      Or run in a vm with snapshots if you don't need raw video hardware access.

    46. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I would say that I did not buy a recurring license, so why should I not have the right to continue to enjoy the benefits of the license I paid for, same as I can use a book or any other copyrighted material for as long as I want once I've paid my license.

      They want to use copyright law, no problem. Make them choke on it. I have physical possession of those copyrighted bits, I paid for them, and to deprive me of using them is piracy. :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    47. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer the word "ignorant" as in lacking knowledge or awareness. Not to be confused with "stupid" as in lacking intelligence.

      You'd do well in life to not confuse the two.

    48. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, yes. Called him a shill! Used the $ to replace the S!

      You got him so good!

      Try closing your mouth when you breath, it's getting skunky in here.

    49. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      I would say that I did not buy a recurring license, so why should I not have the right to continue to enjoy the benefits of the license I paid for, same as I can use a book or any other copyrighted material for as long as I want once I've paid my license.

      Who is stopping you from using them?

      Windows XP still works, in fact it was updated for far longer than planned and has far more features then when launched.

      You can keep using it...

    50. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Go choke on a forced Win10 upgrade.

    51. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      You can no longer reinstall it because it requires activation when you install and there are no servers to activate with. Also they will not allow you to activate it over the phone either, saying "We no longer support that operating system".

    52. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      What you seem to be saying is that copyright should go away if the copyright holder refuses to do arbitrarily much additional work on the software. Should third-party copyrights be forfeited also, because they licensed the use of code in a software product that someone else decided to give up on?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    53. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Here in the US, it can cost extra to buy your own phone independently from your carrier. I don't know how it works in First World nations.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    54. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Except that contracts have to conform to the law to be valid. I can't contract with you to perform an illegal action or provide certain otherwise legal sexual services, and it happens that we can't form a legal contract that violates Magnusson-Moss.

      The fact is that contracts are not self-enforcing, and the only means we have to enforce contracts is the government. The government will enforce certain contracts and not others. Even a libertarian utopia would have to deal with this.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    55. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by Rexdude · · Score: 1

      At least on a PC you can get rid of the preinstalled crapware since it's not baked into /system.

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
    56. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's what I thought, you're a tool pure and simple

    57. Re:If I can delete them. I don't care by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      YES.

      IF the OS is no longer supported. ALL of it should be public domain at that point.

  3. Dont use a Verizon phone by krelvin · · Score: 1

    I use a carrier unlocked Nexus on my Verizon account... No bloat there, none allowed.

    Looked at getting a Samsung S7 to replace my Samsung S6 when I was looking but the Verizon price was ridiculous and the Nexus was easier to deal with.

    1. Re:Dont use a Verizon phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that you can't unlock the bootloader on those phones.

    2. Re:Dont use a Verizon phone by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Easier yet - buy an unlocked phone of whatever, then tie it to Net10, Tracfone, or whatever... using Verizon's network anyway.

      My LG G3 cost me $200 off of Amazon, and does everything I want it to. It took all of an hour to plug it in, set up a $35/mo semi-unlimited plan, and it happily does tx/rx over Verizon's network. I save enough money on average to buy two unlocked slightly-behind-the-times phones a year if I so desired, and if I did that I would still be ahead of the typical Subsidy Schmuck paying Verizon for his new-shiny.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  4. No longer subsitized anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Since we are buying the phones outright; we should have root anyway. The only real argument was that we didn't 'own' the phones and they needed to keep us out because of that.

  5. And this is a shock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Years ago we used Blackberry on Verizon. One day all our search engines changed to Bing, and there was no longer a way to change it. There was a dropdown with exactly one choice. We could not even change the setting with the BES as I remember.

    1. Re:And this is a shock? by ls671 · · Score: 1

      You can go to google.com and search from there if you wish. A little annoying but that's what I do in corpo environment or on locked devices.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  6. How much for a de-gorped phone? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    How many years before* I have to pay extra for a "plain old just-the-OS-and-bare-bones applications"* phone?

    *Or has this date already passed?

    **At a minimum, a phone-dialing app (without a phone, it's a pocket-sized tablet) and an app to install other apps (probably a "store" app or a web browser)?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by gmack · · Score: 1

      Its easy. Just don't buy your phone from the carrier.

    2. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by tepples · · Score: 2

      As of 2016, how easy is it for someone who's not super technical to buy an Android phone without carrier branding that works well on Verizon or Sprint? Even if hardcore users of Slashdot have a lot of time to learn to do their own research, our non-technical friends and family may not.

      For those playing at home and unaware of the differences between the U.S. phone market and that of the rest of the world: Unlike T-Mobile and AT&T, which use GSM, Verizon and Sprint use CDMA2000. Unlike GSM and its successors (UMTS and LTE), CDMA2000 allows a carrier to choose to program the subscriber identity directly into the handset rather than issuing a CSIM card. This gives the carrier far more leverage as to what devices are used on its network. Some people who live in areas without good coverage from T-Mobile, considered the most customer-friendly U.S. carrier, may choose Verizon or Sprint in order to avoid AT&T, the U.S. carrier with the worst customer service.

    3. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      They have no leverage because the law was changed to force them to let you use any unlocked phone on the network. So the answer is you show up with a CDMA phone and say "active this."

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    4. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      One word: Nexus.. Unlocked and no bloatware.. (well, other than the *extra* shit that Google includes that many don't use/want.. All the "Google Play Music/Movies/Games apps that I can't seem to get rid of, even though my Nexus 4 is rooted...) All I want is Gmail, and the Google Play basic store app... Fuck the rest.. Dunno what they did to keep that other crap on even when I'm rooted and use one of the removal apps.... My Nexus 4 may be a bit old, but its on Android 5.1.1 and works perfectly.. Don't need anything newer..

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    5. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      As of 2016, how easy is it for someone who's not super technical to buy an Android phone without carrier branding that works well on Verizon or Sprint? Even if hardcore users of Slashdot have a lot of time to learn to do their own research, our non-technical friends and family may not.

      As of March 2016, I brought a Nexus 6p to the Verizon company store and told them to transfer my phone number to it. They knew to look up the ESN/IMEI, poke it into a Verizon support website (on their own support tablet) to validate that it's compatible with their network, go get a nano-sim and put it into the phone, and transfer the account and phone number to it. Half an hour, no drama.

      I didn't have to know, do, or tell them anything. I am a super technical guy, so I was watching like a hawk, ready to manspain anything they didn't get right, but it wasn't necessary.

      It can work, if you get someone competent at the support site. Such a thing isn't guaranteed, but it's not impossible either.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    6. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Some people who live in areas without good coverage from T-Mobile, considered the most customer-friendly U.S. carrier, may choose Verizon or Sprint in order to avoid AT&T, the U.S. carrier with the worst customer service.

      I fall into this category. I do not live in the boonies... I live INSIDE the LA City Limits... and I tried T-Mobile and got no signal. I would drop Verizon like a rock if I could get T-Mobile coverage at my house.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    7. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      Its easy. Just don't buy your phone from the carrier.

      And another Rand fan boy is heard from...
      Sorry, boy, but your free market idealism fails, for the same reason all free market idealism fails - consumers are not able to make intelligent decisions. No, that is not the same as saying consumers are not intelligent. The mythical free market requires that consumers are free to choose the goods and services they need from a competitive marketplace. Most consumers of smartphones lack the technical expertise to do as you suggest, buying a phone from some source other than the carrier or it's agent. This leaves them at the mercy of a carrier (and it's agents) who will exploit this by forcing egregious terms onto the consumer.

      Hell, I am technically savvy enough to buy an unlocked phone and the service I want/need, but I don't want to. It's a hassle I don't have time for, so I will pay a reasonable premium for a phone free of crap-ware. Since there is nowhere enough competition in the space to make that a reality, I will settle for regulation making it so.

    8. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      how easy is it for someone who's not super technical to buy an Android phone without carrier branding that works well on Verizon or Sprint?

      Very. Just go to the Android Play store, and order a Google Nexus phone. There are other phones that are also available(OnePlus3 for example),depending on which carrier you use, but Sprint/Verizon are tied to the older CDMA technology in part, so those certain phones may not have all features available on those networks. So, while you will have LTE connection, fallback to CDMA may not exist.

      Once those older technologies are retired out of service, it will be less problematic.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    9. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by green1 · · Score: 2

      I think you're wrong about why it fails, it's not because the customers are uneducated, it's because the cellular marketplace isn't really a "competitive market".

      Now there's a good argument to be made that it can't be a truly competitive market as there are limited numbers of frequencies available, and it's therefore more of a natural monopoly, but the point still stands. If the market isn't free, than the free market can't solve any problems.

    10. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by ZiakII · · Score: 2

      Just buy a Nexus 5x or 6x. Works on every major 4 carriers (Sprint, AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile).

    11. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by gmack · · Score: 1

      It's not that hard. I bought my last 8 core/ 3 GB ram/IPS 1080p screen/ dual sim phone for $150 USD including shipping.. It does GSM/3G/LTE with no trouble. My carrier (Telus) keeps trying to get me to buy a phone from them but I don't want to lose the "bring your own phone" discount. I also don't want to lose the ability to just drop in another SIM card when I travel.

    12. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then the question becomes one of which CDMA phones support Verizon's and Sprint's frequency bands. Back in the day, many GSM/UMTS phones were stuck on 2G when used on T-Mobile because they didn't support the AWS band.

    13. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all the current nexus phone you can by from the google store are CDMA compatible, i bought a 5x for me and 6p for the wife, popped in the sim cards, went through activation, so fuss no muss everything works fine. My sim fit fine coming from a motoX(2014), but my wife was coming from a lg G2, and the sim was too large, since it was late, and verizon sometimes wants to charge you for a new sim, i just cut the old one down with a pair of utility scissors and it worked without issue.

      But yeah, you're not going to have any issue with using a nexus on verizon at this point all the current phones work, the new ones coming out in a month will as well.

    14. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virgin Mobile uses Sprint lines and allows you to buy contractless phones. Some of them are pretty good and some are under $100.

      I don't care how "untechnical" a person is - if they aren't willing to do a modicum of research (like finding out what networks are available and actually clicking on some links to do some reading) they've already given up their choices.

      Jesus Christ people, have we really come to a point where someone has to hold your hand for EVERYTHING?

    15. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by tomhath · · Score: 1

      If all they get is $1 or 2 per installed crapware I'd be willing to pay an extra few bucks to avoid the hassle of uninstalling the junk.

      However, if they're planning on installing dozens of "apps" I might not be interested in the carrier.

    16. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      Since Verizon is the dominant CDMA carrier in the US, pretty much all CDMA phones work with Verizon. You would have to try very hard to find a model built for the US that doesn't. Sprint would be the big problem.

      And the T-Mobile issues aren't completely gone. They are rolling out very extensive coverage on LTE band 12 using the spectrum they bought a few years ago. But phones older than a year or two often don't support band 12.

      E.g., the Nexus 6 works everywhere on T-Mobile, but the iPhone 5C does not.

      That would be my primary qualifier in recommending a carrier for anyone else---do you have a phone that support LTE band 12, or are you willing to buy one? If so, T-mobile all the way. Otherwise, you can only count on good coverage in cities and along major travel corridors.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    17. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      Which phone did you use?

      T-Mobile is deploying all their new 4G towers on LTE band 12, and support for band 12 was pretty much nonexistent in devices prior to 2014/2015. Even now, budget handsets often lack it.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    18. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      It was an older 3G phone (I think -- it's been a while), and then I got a SIM card for an assistive voice device, which would never get more than 1 bar (if I was lucky).

      How can I try it out without buying one?

      Also if you're familiar with the area, I'm in the west San Fernando Valley, if it helps.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    19. Re:How much for a de-gorped phone? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Nexus Yes. Other non-carrier based phones like OnePlus 3 ... not so much.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  7. You can bet on one thing with certainty here. by sehlat · · Score: 0

    Verizon bloatware will be just as unremoveable (unless you root the phone) as Apple's bloatware.

    1. Re:You can bet on one thing with certainty here. by TigerPlish · · Score: 2

      Verizon bloatware will be just as unremoveable (unless you root the phone) as Apple's bloatware.

      Funny, I don't see apps for Wal-Mart, Best Buy, Macy's, etc pre-installed on my iToys. (I suppose those would be 3 of the "Big Brands" Verizon was about?

      I do see things like the a stock ticker, Watch app, and a few other things I can't remove, so I've made a folder called "useless," put those things in there, and away we go. Hell, I use the stock ticker myself to research the health of say, a prospective new employer.

      What Verizon wants to do is put "Big brand" apps in your phone. Which Apple hasn't done, and I hope they don't.

      But hey -- starting with iOS 10 you will be able to remove the useless built-in apps you don't want!

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    2. Re:You can bet on one thing with certainty here. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Verizon bloatware will be just as unremoveable (unless you root the phone) as Apple's bloatware.

      Err....what Apple bloatware?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:You can bet on one thing with certainty here. by sehlat · · Score: 1

      If you don't want it and don't want to use it and it's unremoveable, it's bloatware.

    4. Re:You can bet on one thing with certainty here. by sehlat · · Score: 2

      My "Trash" collection includes:

      Calculator Calendar Wallet Game Center (I HATE THAT POS!)
      Compass Notes Maps iTunes Store
      Mail FaceTime Tips Podcasts
      Contacts Videos Music Just Friends
      Health Watch News Reminders

      I have MUCH better non-Apple apps for all of the above.
      If you don't want it and don't want to use it, it's bloatware.

    5. Re:You can bet on one thing with certainty here. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Not to disagree, but contacts? What do you use instead?

      I use a Nexus, so having never used an iPhone, this didn't make sense to me.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    6. Re:You can bet on one thing with certainty here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you use an iPhone but you don't use FaceTime nor iTunes? That's like installing Linux but then going to the trouble of running Windows XP in Wine to use Internet Explorer 7.

    7. Re:You can bet on one thing with certainty here. by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Yea, it's almost as if he wants to use his phone as a phone.

    8. Re:You can bet on one thing with certainty here. by sehlat · · Score: 2

      Here's my list of replacements, starting with the one you asked about.

      Contacts is replaced by Playa Apps' A2Z Contacts and Synctastic

      Calendar is replaced by Readdle's Calendars and Calendars5

      Calculator is replaced by Creative Creek's MathU RPN Calculator (emulates an HP RPN)

      Notes are stored either in KeePass Touch, Google Keep, and gTasks Pro, depending on what they're for.

      Maps are replaced by Google Map

      Mail is replaced by Google's Inbox(Personal) and Readdle's Spark(Work)

      Videos, Music, Podcasts are replaced with VLC for iOS. I don't need iTunes to load it.

      Reminders are replaced by gTasks Pro, which does tasks, reminders, location alerts etc. etc.

      As far as Wallet, FaceTime, Tips, Just Friends, Watch, and News are concerned,
      they're in don't give a damn status.

      Health might tempt me except it apparently insists on reporting everything to Apple's cloud.
      As a result, I wouldn't touch it with at a hundred yards with a waldo.

      And Game Center is an abomination that apparently wants to push me into being "more social." Meh.

      FYI, I use Marvin 3 and Marvin as my fiction readers, Hyphen for fact books/professional books/science articles.

    9. Re:You can bet on one thing with certainty here. by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      Starting with IOS 10 you will be able to delete Apple apps.

      https://support.apple.com/en-u...

    10. Re:You can bet on one thing with certainty here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I notice on that list that you still can't remove the maternally incestuous game center.

    11. Re:You can bet on one thing with certainty here. by adamstew · · Score: 1

      Game center is completely removed from iOS 10 altogether. http://toucharcade.com/2016/06...

  8. Golden opportunity by Calydor · · Score: 1

    Does Verizon test whether any of these apps are actually a rootkit masquerading as an app? If not, I'd say that's pretty cheap for guaranteed delivery to people who don't know how their phone SHOULD be behaving.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    1. Re:Golden opportunity by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Does Verizon test whether any of these apps are actually a rootkit masquerading as an app?

      The answer is obvious: no

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    2. Re:Golden opportunity by swb · · Score: 1

      Verizon get $5 instead of $2 per install if it is a rootkit.

  9. This is outrage? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    Did we really think companies wouldn't charge money for advertising?

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  10. How many apps? by Daetrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How many potential installs are they looking for? If i were a Verizon customer i'd consider paying at _least_ $10 extra to avoid having all the extra crap installed on my phone.

    (Assuming of course that after paying the Danegeld the amortized cost would still be less than switching to a different phone on a different provider.)

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re: How many apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was them I would double dip. Raegan did it. I repeat, no new taxes. ^^piece signs up^^

    2. Re:How many apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $10/month FTFY.

    3. Re:How many apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably receive $10 per app install, if they install a dozen different apps from other companies, you'd be paying more like $120 extra.

    4. Re:How many apps? by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      They probably receive $10 per app install, if they install a dozen different apps from other companies, you'd be paying more like $120 extra.

      According to TFS, "Verizon was seeking between $1 and $2 for each device affected".

      So if they install a dozen different apps that would be $12 - $24.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    5. Re:How many apps? by chihowa · · Score: 1

      (Assuming of course that after paying the Danegeld the amortized cost would still be less than switching to a different phone on a different provider.)

      Assuming that paying the Danegeld once gets you off of the hook forever, which you know it doesn't (since you're referring to it as Danegeld). Verizon's next step it to find out who is willing to pay more on a continual basis and then expect it to be paid regularly.

      You're already paying for service. Paying extra to avoid new abuses is setting a bad precedent.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    6. Re:How many apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If i were a Verizon customer

      Why would you be a Verizon customer?

      I can see no reason for being one. None. This is just another reason for not being one. One of many.

    7. Re:How many apps? by NoSalt · · Score: 1

      > If i were a Verizon customer i'd consider paying at _least_ $10 extra to avoid having all the extra crap installed on my phone.

      FUCK THAT!!! I bought the phone and I pay heavily for the service. I should absolutely NOT be required to pay even more money not to be annoyed or spied upon. Just another example of the rich getting richer off of hardworking Americans' backs.

  11. Verizon taking pages from Microsoft playbook by kheldan · · Score: 1

    So Verizon is taking lessons on business strategy from Microsoft now? Shove unwanted software down your customers' throats all in the name of profit? Them, them, fuck them. Yet another thing to add to my 'reasons to never own a smartphone' list. Hell, even the cheap-ass $50 LG phone AT&T gave me to replace my otherwise perfectly-working 2G phone (because they're decomissioning 2G towers, bastards!) has shit on it I don't want and would rather have the memory free for other things. What a shitfest mobile phones are becoming!

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re: Verizon taking pages from Microsoft playbook by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Why do you think Verizon bought aol and yahoo? They wanted to learn the best ways to abuse your customers.

      Next up Verizon buys Comcast for customer service specialists

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Verizon taking pages from Microsoft playbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want and would rather have the memory free for other things.

      If you don't have a smartphone, what the fuck do you need memory available for?

      Yeah, this smells like bullshit.

    3. Re:Verizon taking pages from Microsoft playbook by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Oh gee you totally caught me out on my Grand Scheme to Fool Everyone! How intelligent you are!

      OMFG STFU you idiot. It's got a shitty, but working, music player built in and stereo bluetooth compatibility, which is strange for a $50 phone. The handful of extra megs of memory used up by shitty wallpapers I don't want and shitty ringtones I don't want could be an extra song or two I might want to hear if I'm desperate, or a few extra photos stored from it's shitty camera.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  12. Carrier Phones - RIP by Carcass666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    There doesn't appear to be much of a reason to buy a carrier-bound phone anymore, especially Android.

    • Security updates are few and far between
    • Major OS updates are almost non-existent
    • Blocking of OS functionality (ex. expandable storage on SD), WI-FI calling
    • Vendor bloatware
    • And now, third-party bloatware
    • Little financial benefit (what little there ever was) in subsidization

    Basically, if you want an Android phone that will remain supported, you almost have to go non-carrier Nexus

    1. Re:Carrier Phones - RIP by SeriousTube · · Score: 1

      If you want wifi calling on tmobile it's the other way around. All of the phones they sell do it. Very few others do, maybe one or two.

    2. Re:Carrier Phones - RIP by green1 · · Score: 1

      Is the BYOD price on any carrier low enough for that to be true?
      Around here you only come out ahead if you can find a new non-carrier phone for less than $240 which seems highly unlikley.

    3. Re:Carrier Phones - RIP by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, the Nexus phones all support WiFi calling. What Nexus branded device do you have that won't do WiFi calling? That information would probably be worth a +5 Informative

    4. Re:Carrier Phones - RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All phones do wi-fi calling. Just not through their "phone" dialer app.

      Skype, Line, and Hangouts are the answer to a stingy carrier like T-Mobile. Just bypass them.

      (And, yes, I know exactly what you're referring to, since I have a Lumia 950XL on T-Mobile, and it doesn't allow carrier-supported wi-fi calling or texting because I didn't buy it from T-Mobile.)

    5. Re:Carrier Phones - RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      T-Mobile didn't have anything suitable at any price.

      Rules:
      1) No Apple. I've been there, and I've done that, and I'm not going back.
      2) No Android. I've been there, and I've done that, and I'm not going back.
      3) No locked phones. I'm tired of not being able to remove Flipboard and a dozen other bullshit apps that I will never use from my phone.
      4) Your flagship phone is not worth $800 with all of this locked-down shit on it.
      5) Your 5-year-old model is not worth $200 with all of this locked-down shit on it.
      6) SO MUCH PINK! MY EYES! THE GOGGLES, THEY DO NOTHING! OH GOD, IT BURNS!

      So I bought a Lumia 950XL and swapped the SIM in. I don't miss wi-fi calling, and everything else works the same as or better than before.

    6. Re:Carrier Phones - RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you said no to iOS and Android, you said no to locked-down phones, and you're running Windows phone instead. You're either full of shit or have no reasonable basis for your post.

    7. Re:Carrier Phones - RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Galaxy Nexus doesn't and never did. The latest Cyanogenmod doesn't support it on any device. Are you going to move the goalposts now?

      T-mobile wifi-calling doesn't even use a standard protocol. I'm not aware of any non Tmo branded device supporting it. Can you point to one that does?

    8. Re:Carrier Phones - RIP by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      And now, third-party bloatware

      They've had that for a while. They're just expanding it.

      No, I don't want NFL Mobile on my phone. I know lots of people are fanatical about sports, but I just don't care. It's not the only 3rd-party bloatware that came with my phone that I cannot install (just disable).

    9. Re:Carrier Phones - RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can use sprint towers, there is more than one MVNO with zero BYOD fee. Ting and RingPlus are like this. FreedomPop charges for activation, but it's way better than buying a device from them (unless you know the right way to do it, but you won't get a high end phone that way).

      And honestly, don't use FreedomPop unless you *need* wifi calling and texting because anything they could mess up or make weird, they certainly did.

      If you use less than 3 or 4 gigs of data per month and you don't like paying every month for cell phone service, do some research on RingPlus.

    10. Re:Carrier Phones - RIP by green1 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I'm not in the USA.

      Carriers here don't have a "BYOD fee" but they do have a different price for your monthly charge for BYOD vs their subsidized phones. But the price difference, over the 2 year contract, is only about half the price of the device bought outright, meaning that it's cheaper to buy the device on contract.

  13. Violation of CFAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are installing software without permission on someone's personal computer.

    1. Re:Violation of CFAA by green1 · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the fact that this is a big company with money and lawyers, laws only apply to little people.

    2. Re:Violation of CFAA by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It's a big company that can afford to spend money on expensive lawyers to go over every customer agreement and make sure it's legal. They can't safely break the law, but they know what's legal or not better than little people do.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  14. symptoms, symptoms by supernova87a · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This kind of behavior is just a symptom of the deeper problem that no one (or very few people) at these traditional telecom companies are fundamentally interested in advocating for the customer's comprehensive experience and satisfaction.

    They view every interaction as a way to milk out profit in the short term, regardless of how much of the burden and dissatisfaction it shifts onto the consumer.

    Any wonder, then, that whenever the customer has a chance to dump them and shift to a provider/medium/hardware solution that works better and is considerate of the customer's desires, they do?

    1. Re:symptoms, symptoms by sinij · · Score: 2

      They view every interaction as a way to milk out profit in the short term, regardless of how much of the burden and dissatisfaction it shifts onto the consumer.

      This is their fiduciary duty to shareholders. This is how corporate capitalism works, by design.

    2. Re:symptoms, symptoms by BoRegardless · · Score: 2

      Boy, do you have it right on "milk out profit in the short term." The CEO needs his retirement parachute, before it goes up in flames!

    3. Re:symptoms, symptoms by hey! · · Score: 0

      You are 100% right. If there is a way of monetizing their customer base, it's their duty to do it unless forbidden by contract (e.g. with vendors like Apple) or regulation.

      Companies aren't in the business of making you a satisfied customer. Usually that's a good strategy, but when they can make more money pissing you off, they will. And if you think that can't happen, open your eyes.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:symptoms, symptoms by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      They have a duty to build a successful company. They can totally say "goodwill is a better investment than $2 million dollars from an ad company."

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:symptoms, symptoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a shareholder, it's not in my interest for them to tank the customer's goodwill in favor of short-term profits. Running a company into the ground by never looking past the next quarter is rarely the best strategy for the shareholders.

    6. Re:symptoms, symptoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a ham radio license!

    7. Re:symptoms, symptoms by hey! · · Score: 1

      Most stockholders are focused on quarterly profits. That's because of the way most shares are traded; they don't stay unthought-of in someones portfolio for years. They're traded frequently.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:symptoms, symptoms by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      That's one reason I went Apple. Before the iPhone, I had a choice of four carriers to screw me. After Apple came in, I had an additional choice, and figured that I'd get a better dinner and show out of Apple.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  15. This is why I don't let them touch my phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When i buy a new phone I don't let reps touch it even to activate or transfer numbers/settings.

    1. Re:This is why I don't let them touch my phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That behavior would not prevent what the article is describing.

  16. Coverage changes and now this by geek · · Score: 1

    Verizon coverage where I live used to be amazing. But this last year something changed and its been degrading terribly. I was going to try an Android phone again next year but between this news and the worsening coverage I may just end up going to T-Mobile. At least I get wifi calling with them.

    1. Re:Coverage changes and now this by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest Project Fi if you're considering a Nexus phone, depending on your situation.

      Your voice and data comes over whatever is the best connection among T-Mobile, Sprint, US Cellular, and Fi hotspots at any given location.

      + Coverage is better than any individual carrier.
      + Data speeds will be very good almost everywhere.
      + Voice, text, and data pricing are extremely competitive.
      + Wifi calling is automatic and preferred when available.

      - No group plans
      - No equivalent to T-Mobile's Binge On
      - Only available for Nexus devices at present

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  17. Carrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does carrier have so much control over a phone?

    It would be like ISP require Dell, Lenovo, Gateway, etc to install their adware on the computer before user is allow on the internet?

    At least on a computer I can uninstall all the adware or reinstall OS

    1. Re:Carrier by PPH · · Score: 1

      Why does carrier have so much control over a phone?

      Because US consumers never demanded unlocked phones that can be obtained from third parties and configured to a network with portable SIMs.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  18. The dire contrast between how... by X86BSD · · Score: 2

    Apple treats its customers and its views of security and privacy versus google is astoundingly shocking. Apple may be a walled garden. But you don't see any of the daily malware stories, hacking stories, stories like this on iOS. Think what you want about Apple, call them liars, etc but they really DO care about the user experience and users security. Enjoy your craptastic android phones that get better by the minute!

    1. Re:The dire contrast between how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of nickle and diming with 3rd party apps, they do so with dongles.

    2. Re:The dire contrast between how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They care about the user experience a lot which is a good thing. But the problem is that they only care about *their* view of the user experience. If you don't like the way they do thing, tough luck.

    3. Re:The dire contrast between how... by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Problem is, it's not really Google at fault here. If it was Google, they would have the same leverage Apple did when they told the carriers to take their crapware and fuck off. Google makes the OS but they don't make many of the phones. They are one level removed. It's up to HTC, Samsung, LG, etc to try to exert that pressure on the carriers and most don't have the leverage to do it. Samsung might, but they don't seem interested in using it.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    4. Re: The dire contrast between how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple gets paid at least $1 billion each year for having Google as default search in iOS Safari. This info was leaked out from the Oracle and Google court case. Apple got paid to spam iPhone users with U2 music.

    5. Re:The dire contrast between how... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I think that's the right answer for a developer. "Here's my view of what I think things should look like. Don't like it, go elsewhere." It's a main reason why OS X on the desktop had been more successful than Linux on the desktop.

      Most people won't take the time to configure their UI. And most superusers use enough different machines that it has to be similar to the standard view anyway. And smaller developers will always have ot make a view that works well for people using the defaults.

      Let's go the other way. Why should multiple UX paradigms be supported?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    6. Re:The dire contrast between how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's one thing to not want to support other UX paradigms. It's another to prevent other UX paradigms.
      The issue with "walled garden" is not "garden" but "walled". If Apple doesn't want other to modify the "garden" like linux does, it's also fine. When they prevent users from going in another garden / install a different web browser on the device, that's a totally different thing!

  19. grass "roots" effort to stop this by mabu · · Score: 1

    I think if consumers were aware they had more options, this wouldn't happen. I would like to see some consumer friendly web sites that let people know what options are available for each model phone and carrier in terms of controlling apps and bloat. I find it very frustrating Verizon has a bunch of stuff bundled on my phone that I can't un-install, but I'm not sure what my options are if I want to take matters into my own hands?

    1. Re:grass "roots" effort to stop this by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      Another problem is people not researching what's available until they need a new phone.

      I'm not sure how many phones are sold this way but that's how I bought my current phone. A slight impact killed the screen (it was already old and had survived harder impacts, but this must have been the proverbial straw).

      At this point I look around the internet for a few minutes studying a few options. I was really busy that day and didn't want to spend much time. I already know I'm going to the Verizon Store, because I just want a phone right now so I can get on with other things.

      I don't regret my choice. It may not have been the best choice for me, but unless someone is a loyal customer of one brand or another and will always go with that brand's latest and greatest or unless they have been persuaded by advertising a lot of us don't really know which phone we would get if we had to buy one right now.

      My biggest complaint is that the promised Marshmallow update isn't available for it - even though Verizon still says I'm going to get it....someday.

  20. Apple Fanboy Here by hondo77 · · Score: 2

    How's escaping the tyranny of Apple's walled garden working out for you? Meet the new boss, worse than the old boss.

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    1. Re:Apple Fanboy Here by ZiakII · · Score: 4, Informative

      How's escaping the tyranny of Apple's walled garden working out for you? Meet the new boss, worse than the old boss.

      Fine because I just buy a Google Nexus Phone and can do whatever the hell I want with it? Unlocked boot-loader, root access, because its my own piece of hardware.

    2. Re:Apple Fanboy Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Never bought a carrier phone, I protect myself from anyone's tyranny. I'm the boss of my devices.
      And how is the jailed life inside the garden working out for you? Do you love being protected from carriers by your boss? Do you like his *** taste?

    3. Re:Apple Fanboy Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who chooses Android over Apple because of their tyranny will not be affected by this. We'll just buy a cheap Chinese or a Google Nexus. You're really an Apple Fanboy, the lack of sense proves it.

    4. Re:Apple Fanboy Here by Shados · · Score: 1

      I buy my phone wherever and stick a SIM card in it ::shrugs::

      The only thing Android does then is that SIM cards can contain instructions to install carrier specific software, which you can opt out of. I rather I didn't have to do that, but its a minor step to take.

    5. Re:Apple Fanboy Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey remember the time Apple approved a bunch of bitcoin malware that stole people's money? Because that just happened.

    6. Re:Apple Fanboy Here by NoSalt · · Score: 0

      Do any of the Nexus phones have SD card slots and removable batteries?

  21. It's time to break their necks again by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 0

    Verizon and AT&T are what is left of the plethora of companies that the old AT&T was splintered into decades ago. It's high time to bring this bastards to heel again, with extreme prejudice.

  22. You've got options with t-Mobile by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

    If you get decent coverage everywhere but your house and you have internet access at home try one of these:
    - wi-fi calling (t-mobile really pushes this)
    - micro-cell (or as t-mobile calls it CellSpot)

    Getting off the Verizon train really is possible for most people.

  23. this isn't already standard practice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised this isn't already just standard practice. There seemed to be a (smallish, it doesn't have that much room to start with) amount of crapware/bloatware preinstalled on my cheapo Moto E from Total Wireless

  24. Dear Android developers by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    Please please please let me remove any app I don't want without being forced to root my phone.

    Fuck these assholes.

  25. A STORY ABOUT ADS --- FBI AS FUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gtfo.

  26. Class action by bagofbeans · · Score: 2

    The purpose of a class action is not to recompense the victims, but to sting the offender a large sum of money so they don't do it again.

    It's only worthwhile from the lawyers' perspective if they get paid.

    So the choice is to allow the laywers to be paid, or to allow companies to get away with micro bill padding and other nasty activity that isn't worth an individual lawsuit.

  27. What a crock of shit the "shareholders" idea is by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is their fiduciary duty to shareholders.

    This is utterly wrong. They have a duty to try and keep the company healthy. Angering customers who then leave is doing the opposite.

    What you and all of the other ignorant people that parrot your "fiduciary duty" crap fail to realize is that money is only one metric of a companies success, and even that is measured in the long term. Otherwise I could literally offer them one dollar to have all sales people dress like rabbits and they would be forced to do so because $1 is greater than $0.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:What a crock of shit the "shareholders" idea is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much the wolf need to worry about angered sheeps?

    2. Re:What a crock of shit the "shareholders" idea is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Angering customers who then leave ...

      Customers could leave on principle but with lock-in contracts, there's no benefit to the customer. The corporation provides, in theory, the service the people want but in reality, people can only buy whatever is proffered. So a corporation needs to make a product as good as the competition, not make a better product. Local area monopolies reduce the phone services competition to almost nil, allowing the corporation to screw the customer more than usual instead of providing a service the customer desires.

      ... that is measured in the long term.

      By whom? One reason the share market is so volatile is the dive in share price that occurs when a corporation doesn't have 4% growth for the quarter. This is caused by people who claim to be investing in the future of the corporation.

      ... they would be forced to do so ...

      Their boss is offering a regular income and a retirement package, so if the sales people cared only about money (which you didn't disprove and their perpetual habit of promising something that smells pink and glows in the dark, is very telling), your $1 offer isn't competitive and should be answered with a kick in the balls.

    3. Re:What a crock of shit the "shareholders" idea is by sinij · · Score: 1

      I never stated this this system is anything but shit. We created imaginary entities that are designed to enable psychopathic behavior by groups of people. Kind of like piracy on the high seas, minus the risk of getting hanged.

      But it is how system works. Money is the only metric, by design, and if you offer them enough money they will dress like rabbits.

  28. Repeat of old Bell Co tactic by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 2

    Before cell phones and tablets existed, the Bell Companies sold their white page listings to third party marketers without customers' consent.

    Then when customers started complaining about telemarketers, the Bell Companies offered to sell them tools to block them. They never told the customers about the sale of their personal data.

    The Bell Companies pocketed money twice - from the marketers, then from the customers.

    I'm seeing a similar pattern from Verizon. They sell direct install apps to marketers, then customers complain and Verizon offers to sell tools to block those apps.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  29. Depends on carrier but yes by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    T-Mobile doesn't subsidize phones. You pay the full price. You can pay it up front or over 24 months (interest free) but it is full retail. So it makes no difference if you get it from them or someone else.

    Also means their plans tend to be cheaper than competing plans, since there's no subsidy rolled in to the monthly charge.

    1. Re:Depends on carrier but yes by green1 · · Score: 1

      That would be refreshing, here we get a discount for BYOD, but it's not that much. They have 3 tiers of phones you can subsidize, basic, smartphones, premium smartphones.
      Start with the BYOD price, add $5/mo for the basic phones, $10/mo for the smartphones, and $15/mo for the premium smartphones. Over the 2 year contract period, those prices don't cover the cost of buying one of those devices. This tells me that even if you BYOD you're still paying roughly half the subsidy cost, meaning it's still cheaper to buy through the carrier.

    2. Re:Depends on carrier but yes by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Used to be that way in the US for all carriers. If they'd even let you BYOD, which was only sometimes, you still paid the full amount on your monthly bill so you were just getting screwed. Only ones that didn't were prepaid carriers, which tend to be niche (usually regional and targeting lower income customers).

      However T-Mobile changed that, their big, and highly successful, marketing push was to do away with contracts which also meant doing away with subsidies. To respond to people complaining about upfront price they then did the 24 month financing.

      Some of the others have followed suit now, since it was a successful campaign, but not all.

    3. Re:Depends on carrier but yes by green1 · · Score: 1

      Our carriers pretend to have followed suit, but the difference between their BYOD price and their full price tells a different story (about half the price of buying a phone, should be the full price (maybe more for interest))

  30. Sprint is doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On Sprint, Virgin Mobile USA and Boost.

    You cannot opt in, you cannot opt out.

    You have no control, no say, no choice.

    You have to manually remove the bloatware infection.

    It's not just bloatware but many apps are different from the Google Playstore apps with different and often greater permissions.

    So pay Sprint and you can have them force your own custom spyware on their poor users!

  31. Malware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it will only take about an hour after this goes live before the first malware download occurs. The NSA/FBI/DEA are going to love this "feature".

  32. Nope for yahoo.com by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

    Neither . nor + works for yahoo.com, just tried it. And mine's a paid account.

    1. Re:Nope for yahoo.com by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Then Yahoo isn't implementing RFC 5233, " Sieve Email Filtering: Subaddress Extension". Since yours is a paid account, I guess you don't always get what you pay for, and you can't use subaddressing to tag emails so you know who leaked your addy.

      Subaddressing is the practice of augmenting the local-part of an [RFC2822] address with some 'detail' information in order to give some extra meaning to that address. One common way of encoding 'detail' information into the local-part is to add a 'separator character sequence', such as "+", to form a boundary between the 'user' (original local-part) and 'detail' sub-parts of the address, much like the "@" character forms the boundary between the local-part and domain.

      Typical uses of subaddressing might be:

      • o A message addressed to "ken+sieve@example.org" is delivered into a mailbox called "sieve" belonging to the user "ken".
      • o A message addressed to "5551212#123@example.com" is delivered to the voice mailbox number "123" at phone number "5551212".
      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  33. Why is this news? by allo · · Score: 1

    I've seen a lot of devices with preinstalled thirdparty stuff like facebook or dropbox. one even had increased dropbox size when the user logged into the dropbox app with his account. Not only the "install app" bonus, but some bonus for using this exact device.