Slashdot Mirror


iOS and Android Combined For Record 99% of Smartphone Sales Last Quarter (macrumors.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The research firm Gartner has crunched some numbers and found that Android and iOS accounted for a record 99.1% worldwide market share in the second calendar quarter of 2016, which is compared to 96.8% in the year-ago period. What some may view as even more shocking is that Android accounted for 86.2% of the market share in the second quarter, up from 82.2% a year ago. Meanwhile, iOS lost some ground as it dropped to 12.9% market share from 14.6% in the year-ago period. It's no surprise that Windows and BlackBerry have been losing market share. They dropped to 0.6% and 0.1% market share worldwide respectively. Just six years ago, BlackBerry and Symbian operating systems were industry leaders. Now, they're industry losers. Which third-party operating system has what it takes to take on the establishment?

15 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. We live in a 2 OS society by The-Ixian · · Score: 5, Funny

    Want to buy a third party? hahaha, go ahead, throw your money away!

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    1. Re:We live in a 2 OS society by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The question is can Google move Android/Chrome to the desktop fast enough to capitalize on their phone dominance. Apple isn't showing any interest in OSX anymore. Linux has to wait for someone to win and then copy.

      Essentially you have Google and Microsoft in a duel where the first to finish assembling the gun in front of them wins. It looks like nothing is happening but as soon as one of them gets an OS and app library that solves both desktop and mobile the race will be over in a near instant.

      Major innovation started and stopped with the shift to capacitive touch/multi-touch touch screens and the availability of 2G Edge data. People scoff at Windows Mobile 5 using a stylus, but anyone who has tried to use a resistive touch screen with their finger knows why styluses were necessary. Apple got there first but their first-mover success is rapidly evaporating and they've lost all advantage they once had on hardware quality and design both in mobile and the desktop market.

      So the question becomes who gets Photoshop first? Windows Mobile as a Universal Application or Google as an android app for the Chromebook?

    2. Re:We live in a 2 OS society by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nah, there is no such thing as an operating system for typical consumer targeted appliances, it pretty much disappears in the background. M$ is dead on consumer appliances and with the Windows 10 probe leaving a permanent memory of 'M$ watching you masturbate' in everyone's minds, never able to cum (tee hee) back. Android with it's someone messy java layer looks to be a lock in. Now can that java layer be fixed to provide better access for high end games and be an extension to a more typical Linux distribution like Ubuntu, to provide greater access to interactive content.

      Apple of course is not so much loosing market share, their high end market remains the same, they are simply not picking up the rapidly expanding low end of the market for smart phones, where the much more competitive and diverse Android systems are taking by storm (so larger market and Apples percentage drops but they retain the same sales because their part of the market was already buying smart phones years ago). Apple pushing privacy was a really smart well timed moved and did real damage to M$ on consumer products (they now hate using windows no matter what the public relations firms claim, that whole windows anal probe 10 a really stupid move by M$ and now demanding people pay for the probe even more insulting, paying to have their privacy stolen, talk about arrogance, mind boggling).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. Android is now officially the new Windows by toadlife · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I could see this years ago when Android was still very flaky POS and iOS completely dominated the smart phone landscape. The parallels between the Android/iOS market and Mac/PC market were too many for it turn out any other way.

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  3. Blackberry by maliqua · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well since blackberry has started using android on its new devices its not even slightly surprising that BB OS is losing market share, i'd be more interested to see if blackberry's market share has gone up or down as a device maker since the switch

  4. Windows Phone by fredgiblet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    WP has what it takes, but it got it too late, had too many missteps along the way and lost the mindshare war. So the only way it can make a dent is if one of the others takes a dive.

    1. Re:Windows Phone by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Huge missteps mostly recently. Windows Phone 7 through 8.1 were fantastic -- always smooth as butter, responsive, relatively bug-free, had a great UI, and had fantastic tools for devs. I also own several high-end Android devices and if you could live with less apps I really do think Windows Phone was superior to Android.

      10 was a huge step back -- no longer smooth and incredibly buggy. I got a Lumia 950 to replace my aging 920 and only now a year later with the Anniversary release can I say it is something they should sell, but it's still only comparable to Android levels of smoothness. I really miss the lag-free 8.1 OS.

  5. 12% is dangerously low by OpenSourced · · Score: 4, Interesting

    12% market share approaches the danger zone. For some applications, perhaps just 5% of your potential public will use iOS. Then you don't develop the iOS version. Market dominance snowballs in this kind of situations, as we regrettably know from the Windows story.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    1. Re:12% is dangerously low by Nemyst · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bear in mind that this is sales, not install base. iOS still has a big install base and they seem to be bigger spenders than Android users in terms of apps.

    2. Re:12% is dangerously low by Lost2Home · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually if you look at the Gartner numbers (broken out by brand), you will see that Android owns the low end market with off brands. If you just compare Samsung vs Apple at the high end, it is about 63% to 37%. So while still a commanding lead, it isn't the overwhelming majority when you consider Apple's target customer base.

    3. Re:12% is dangerously low by danbob999 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem is Apple hasn't done anything interesting since, well, the iPhone 4. The iPhone 4 brought high-DPI displays to smartphones. It was badly needed.

      High DPI displays weren't needed. What was needed (and still is) is high resolution displays. A 1" high-DPI display would be useless. A 2 megapixel display can fit a lot of content no matter its size. It looks good on a 70" TV as well as on a 5" phone. Of course, you don't watch TV from the same distance as you hold your phone.

      DPI was a gimmick, just like retina.
      Up to the iPhone 3GS, the standard resolution on phones was 320x480. Apple had some of the largest displays at 3.5". The first Androids had 3.2" displays with the same resolution. Nobody ever thought on bragging that the DPI was higher on Android. It would have been dumb.
      Then Android makers started releasing larger phones with higher resolution displays, such as the original Droid (854x480, 3.7"). It was a huge improvement over what existed before. Apple wanted to be back in the game, so they released a phone with an even higher resolution (960x640) which was of course even better. Except that since Android makers were releasing 4" phones and Apple was stuck at 3.5", they had to brag about something. So they "invented" (for all practical purposes, since nobody used the term before in the smartphone market) DPI (also refereed to as PPI). Since they now had the smallest displays, even if Android makers reached the same resolution, they would have less DPI so the iPhone would be "superior". Unfortunately, many reviewers bought into that crap and even some people on slashdot.

  6. Re:But But But!!! by BronsCon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Tinder is not available as far as I can tell.

    What would be the point? Who wants to hook up with a Windows Phone user?

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  7. Re:classic chicken and egg. by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, not to say it ain't so, but in this case you're looking at a market where the two current top dogs were rather late to the party and benefited from everyone else dropping the ball big time.

    Nokia was the de facto market leader but simply snoozed when the big change towards touch screens set in.
    Blackberry had the enterprise market firmly in their grasp, and not only did they have a lot of features enterprise users wanted, they also managed to make having a Blackberry as a manager an important status symbol. A decade ago you pretty much HAD to have a Blackberry to be taken serious in management circles. Look where they're now after a series of blunders and hubris.
    And while MS never really had a big market share in the phone business, they had every advantage on their side, they have the de facto standard on desktops and could have worked out something huge with phone + computer tie-ins, in a depth nobody else could achieve. They finally try that but ... too little, too late, and all the accomplish by it now is to piss off their desktop users.

    So, I cannot really say that this is one of those scenarios where the early bird gets the worm, grows big and keeps everyone else in its shadow so they can't grow as well. There were some serious mistakes made by the former market leaders and other competitors. Google and Apple won because they were able to predict better where the market is going and what consumers and business customers alike would want.

    That can change rapidly again. We're today at the point where cellphones get powerful enough to replace netbooks soon. My prediction would be that the manufacturer that manages to find the right gadget at the right time to capitalize on this and offer something that could make the cellphone replace current netbooks, you have the next market leader.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. Doubt it by toadlife · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Apple has done fine on the OSX side with less than 10% share for more than a decade now. Yes, there are many more apps for Windows than OSX, yet their share has been remarkably consistent.

    Apple devices are marketed towards a niche segment that is outside of the commodity (Windows/Android) markets. They enjoy *much* higher profit margins than any Android phone maker. Apple users, being more affluent group, are also more likely to pay for apps in the market, which keeps developers attracted to the platform.

    To paraphrase Voltaire, If Apple did not exist, it would necessary for the market to create one.

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  9. Re:classic chicken and egg. by tgv · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bought a Windows phone (last year) because I don't like Android (bad experiences with Samsung and Moto), and iOS phones are too expensive. And I don't need all those apps. I just want to make a few calls, use internet from time to time, and perhaps look at a map, or send/read a few messages. That's it. Windows is perfectly fine for that, and the phones are competitively priced.

    I guess there are not many like me.