Slashdot Mirror


RealDoll CEO Aims To Make Its Sex Dolls Love You Back Via AI App (mirror.co.uk)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Mirror.co.uk: Matt McMullen, CEO of RealDoll, revealed the next step in making the high-end sex toys will be to give them artificial intelligence to replicate humans more closely than ever. "We are building an AI system which can either be connected to a robotic doll OR experienced in a VR environment," he revealed as part of an AMA (ask me anything) on Reddit. "I think it will allow for an option that never existed before, and for some, may represent a happiness they [users] never thought they could have. We are designing the AI to be fun and engaging, more than focusing on whether it can fool you into thinking it's a person," he said. He later added, when someone asked if dolls will ever love us back: "I hope that we can at least simulate that," McMullen responded. "That's the goal." In addition to AI and VR, Teledildonics are coming to the sex industry as well. "Teledildonics is technology for remote sex where tactile sensations are communicated over a data link between the participants -- with Siri, Alexa, Cortana and other AI software," reports Mirror.co.uk. The company is "putting the finishing touches" on its AI app, with plans to release it within the next six months. Oh, and it's also working on releasing a RealDoll with a robotic head by the end of 2017 to celebrate its 20th anniversary.

13 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. forget about self-driving cars by turkeydance · · Score: 4, Funny

    i'm not leaving the house.

  2. Not tonight dear by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a low battery.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  3. This will go well... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

    There will, surely, be nothing more satisfying than the affection of an expert system that has been tuned to love absolutely anyone whose licensing agreements and software maintenance contract are in order.

  4. IoRCPGT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Internet of Remote-Controlled Penis-Grasping Things.

    No thanks.

  5. Yes, but Will It Be GPL? by WheezyJoe · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm doing NOTHING if I can't review the SOURCE CODE!

    --
    Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    1. Re:Yes, but Will It Be GPL? by cfalcon · · Score: 5, Funny

      > I'm doing NOTHING if I can't review the SOURCE CODE!

      Come on, give it a chance. The last fifty years should have shown you one thing clearly: nothing else can fuck you like closed source software.

  6. Re:These dolls are EXPENSIVE by Tokolosh · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes. They are called pre-divorce guys.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  7. Re:Hot boinky, then back in the box by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's all I want from a "love doll"- one that "loves" me enough to boink my brains out and then climb back into her box.

    This may cut into the market for Slovenian "supermodels".

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  8. Re:All I want to know by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  9. A doll that texts you at work by FrankHaynes · · Score: 3, Funny

    every 5 minutes:

    "Do you miss me?"

    "When are you coming home?"

    "What do you wanna do tonight?"

    "Do you still love me?"

    "WHY DON'T YOU LOVE ME??!!"

    --
    slashdot: A failed experiment.
  10. WELL PLAYED by fluffernutter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Advertising the most technologically advanced sex doll on Slashdot. Well played RealDoll, well played.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  11. Re:Just don't let them talk... Moaning is ok by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just make them body temperature, and maybe give them a pulse?

    Sure, if you're into that kind of thing.

  12. Re:CEO Doll by azrael29a · · Score: 4, Funny

    I shuddered at "RealDoll CEO" . A CEO with three working offices?

    I guess you meant "orifices".