Slashdot Mirror


T-Mobile is Making Its 'Unlimited' Data Plan Even More Confusing (theverge.com)

When T-Mobile announced "One" plan, little did the company know that people wouldn't like seeing their "unlimited" data plan offer video streaming max out at 480p resolution. The company is making some tweaks to that plan, only to make things more confusing to people. It will now begin selling "HD day passes" for $3 per day, allowing customers to stream in 1080p for 24 hours. The Verge reports: That's simple enough, but here's where it gets really weird: T-Mobile is also offering a plan called T-Mobile One Plus, which, among other benefits, offers unlimited HD day passes. So by subscribing to the plan, you can stream 1080p video all you want every single day -- but only if you go and activate the HD day pass again every single day. Presumably, T-Mobile is hoping you'll forget to activate those passes, or else it would have just lifted the 480p quality limit without this bizarre constraint. Making this even more confusing, T-Mobile originally announced plans to offer an "HD add-on" for the One plan that offered unlimited HD streaming without constraints. That's no longer going to be an option, however, so if you want HD video streaming, you're stuck re-enabling it every day. A T-Mobile rep framed the change as "giving customers more" for the same price, which is true (both cost $25 extra per month), but the new plan also involves the strange new reactivation hurdle.

75 comments

  1. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    T-Mobile sucks!

    1. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already knew that.

    2. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, T-Mobile prepaid is so cheap, at $20 for unlimited music streaming. Lemme just hook up my audio modem, and unlimited music becomes unlimited binary data for everything. Sweet!

    3. Re: Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have an audio modem?

    4. Re: Who cares? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Maybe s/he has one of these:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  2. How many ones and plusses? by danbert8 · · Score: 1

    So now I will have to get T-Mobile One Plus on my OnePlus One on T-Mobile? (just kidding, I have Ting who uses T-Mobile's network)

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
  3. HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by burni2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How can T-Mobile differentiate between these,
    as far as I know the connection to youtube is cryptographically secured.

    So one could be guessing by the data rate and the duration, but with browsers using buffering that would be complicated.

    However I would tunnel the traffic through my trusty unlimited broadband at home or my root server, using ssh.

    So T-Mobile ain't see nothing yet !?

    1. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been wondering that since this whole thing started. I have not seen anyone address the issue at all until your post just now.

      The only reason that doesn't surprise me is that we let our presidential candidates get away with pre-kindergarten IT knowledge, and most people look up to them for it.

    2. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      it's not when you're connecting to a binge on partner

    3. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      T-Mobile does not differentiate HD and SD. The OP is using FUD.

      T-Mobile provides a connection with a Quality of Service rated as 1.5Mbs-averaged-over-a-minute for traffic it identifies as streaming video.

      If you put streaming video traffic over a VPN, T-Mobile will not identify it as streaming video. T-Mobile will transmit that traffic as regular data, which may turn out to be a higher rate averaged over a longer time, but the transfer might pause and resume.

    4. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by markus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How can T-Mobile differentiate between these, as far as I know the connection to youtube is cryptographically secured.

      Even with TLS encrypted HTTPS connections, you can see the domain name of the request. If it says youtube.com, T-Mobile can rate limit the connection to something much slower than what it usually would give you. And the rate limiting forces YouTube to downgrade the video resolution.

      So, it's not T-Mobile that selects the lower video resolution, it's YouTube. All T-Mobile does is provide differential network performance based on service; of course, that sounds suspiciously close to a violation of network neutrality. But that's a question for the FCC to decide.

      I suspect the reason why this originally didn't work for YouTube, when T-Mobile first starting rolling out BingeOn is the fact that Google is increasingly using HTTP/2.0 which supports multiple streams in a single connection, and it also is often using QUIC which fundamentally looks very different to a HTTP connection over TCP.

    5. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by ljw1004 · · Score: 4, Informative

      How can T-Mobile differentiate between these,
      as far as I know the connection to youtube is cryptographically secured.

      TMobile addressed this in their technical notes: https://www.t-mobile.com/conte...

      This requires that video detection signatures be present. T-Mobile will work with content providers to ensure that our networks work together to properly detect video. We will continue to work with content providers as new traffic identification means are needed in the event of future technology enhancement or changes. Use of technology protocols which make detection of video difficult such as https and UDP require additional collaboration with TMobile to enable the video detection.

      Presumably you have to work hand-in-hand with TMobile developers to make sure your streams are recognized. I haven't found the technical truth. There was an interesting academic paper: http://david.choffnes.com/pubs..., also outlined here: http://dd.meddle.mobi/bingeon....

      How does BingeOn classify traffic? Our prior differentiation work suggested that DPI devices classify applications using regular expression matches on certain
      fields of HTTP requests and responses, and SNI fields in TLS handshakes

    6. Re: HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by Entrope · · Score: 1

      A lot of video services adapt the bitstream they send based on available bandwidth. So I would guess that if T-Mobile thinks your TCP connection looks like video, they cap it at some 480p-plausible bit rate.

    7. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the solution to tmobile's binge on throttling is an always on VPN session on your phone. I know in the past VPNing from my laptop has defeated tmobile's tethering detection. My guess is they are using something like looking at your HTTP headers to attempt to determine a desktop browser is in use, because they can detect tethering with VPN off, but iv'e transferred gigabytes over VPN and they were none the wiser. also i use Cyanogenmod, so im not using tmobile's tethering app which will probably tattle on you even with the VPN trick.

    8. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We built a proxy tool that does this, and confirmed that it allows free-riding.

      Lol! Somebody give this idiot a cookie for modding a proxy to inject a http header.

    9. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by burni2 · · Score: 2

      First off, I'm not using FUD, because I just asked a question, how to tell based on traffic, and I give a suggestion of a possible circumvention.

      You however just state that t-mobile would identify a connection as streaming video?

      One way would be ip/port, this however does not answer my question, how to differentiate between 480p or 720p on a cryptographically secured connection with certificate check.

      It might pause and resume, but keep in mind your browser is also buffering the video content when viewing youtube, that it would not pause and resume.

    10. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't. But If you havn't paid the booster, they just slow your speeds to SD.

      Youtube will detect this and lower the quality

      That or your just stuck with a whole lot of buffering until you lower it yourself.

    11. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by burni2 · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that if I want to access a streaming service over t-mobile I will do that without encryption?

      How can t-mobile enforce for example your phone not to encrypt the connection?

    12. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by burni2 · · Score: 1

      Thank you that's an intersting perspective.

    13. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phone automatically adjusts the requested bitrate based on the streaming speed. All T-Mobile has to do is throttle traffic to/from youtube's IP/Port and the phone will do the rest. Of course, you could override manually. However, if you do and the stream speed is not high enough, you will experience pauses and buffering.

    14. Re: HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google funded the cretin to reverse-engineer BingeOn.

      This work is generously supported in part by a Google Faculty Research Award.

    15. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have WiFi enabled on your phone, all data will be passed over your home LAN network, not T-Mobile's, so I guess they will not see much of the traffic?

    16. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens if I enable WiFi hotspot on my phone and tether my home LAN network? Where does all data go then?

    17. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      There are multiple ways that a provider can setup their stream to qualify for Binge On zero rating of data. Having your application request a video from a particular server/IP/net block may be sufficient if the provider and T-mobile have agreed to the setup.

    18. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by xrobertcmx · · Score: 1

      I have a home plex server and they used to throttle video from that. Had to turn off Binge On.

    19. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      So the technique either a) violates network neutrality, or b) is brittle and will lead to a lot of customer complaints for miscounting

    20. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by interstellarsurfer · · Score: 1

      Disable IPv6 in your APN settings. It's TMo's servers that are routing your request, and the IPv4 servers aren't playing man-in-the-middle yet.

    21. Re:HD-Traffic vs. SD-Traffic by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the solution to tmobile's binge on throttling is an always on VPN session on your phone.

      But that kindof defeats the purpose. If tmobile can't detect that it's video then yes it's not throttle but it also counts against your data so if you wanted zero rated video then tmobile has to know that it's video.

  4. Unlimited **1 by HumanWiki · · Score: 5, Funny

    **1 -- Not applicable to all plans. Void where prohibited. See merchant for more details. Days that end in Y are excluded. Mobile data restrictions apply. The party of the first part is not beholden to the party of the second part, but is otherwise beholden themselves to the third. Prior approval is required for data entitlement. Data packets larger than 100bytes subject to fee.

  5. Feeling Justified by scunc · · Score: 1

    I usually have this thought whenever I think about my cell phone plan, but man, I'm really glad I don't have T-Mobile!
    -------------
    "We believe carrier pigeons could vastly boost the speed and reliability of our network." -- T-Moblie

  6. If the truth were known... by buss_error · · Score: 1

    ... I doubt any of the cell phone leading providers would escape long prison sentences. If I didn't have to have a cell phone for employment, I wouldn't own one.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    1. Re:If the truth were known... by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      my employer provided Galaxy S6 rarely uses more than 1GB in a month

    2. Re: If the truth were known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides arbitrarily sharif your data usage, what value does your usage bring to the discussion? Your usage has no bearing on my usage, or anyone elses for that matter.

  7. To T-Mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your differentiation from larger, better coverage area providers is slimming every day. I can get what I need from Verizon for $5 more a month and I will get better service in a wider coverage area...

    1. Re:To T-Mobile by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      The same could be said in the other way, as t-mobile expands coverage.

      It becomes less and less necessary to do business with the devil twins of Ma Bell just to get a good signal. (After the old AT&T was broken up into 8 parts, 5 of them re-merged to create new at&t, and 2 of them merged to form Verizon, which means that at&t and verizon together represent 7/8 of a company considered so evil and monopolistic that it had to be cut up and scattered to the four winds like some sort of demon)

      Both at&t and Verizon have burned me in the past with their "we control the network, we control the phones, we control you" mentality. Everything from refusing to allow CDMA sprint phones onto the CDMA verizon network (to force people to get phones exclusively through 2 year contracts), to automatically extending my lock-in contract because I changed minute plans, to charging me full price for a warranty replacement because they didn't count the old phone as "returned" until the warehouse had processed it, even when the warehouse had a 2-month processing backlog.

    2. Re:To T-Mobile by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I am a Verizon customer as well, but there are a few things that make this intriguing

      For one, Verizon does not have an unlimited plan. When one doesn't have that, then one can't enable the data on all devices at all times. Which in my case defeats the purpose of having a data plan. I don't use it for GPS - my car has it. So only thing I use it for is if I'm in a shop, and need to check a few things online in that store's app, or if I get a VOIP or FaceTime call. Aside from that, either at home or work, I have VOIP and wouldn't need a limited data plan. But could use an unlimited one on the road

      The other thing - I'm looking at getting a Surface that is cellular enabled. Guess what - it only works w/ GSM carriers, which rules out both Verizon and Sprint. So if that's gonna be the case, it's worth considering this T-Mo service.

  8. New App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How long until someone writes a $0.99 app that automatically enables HD on a daily basis.

    1. Re:New App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why haven't you written it yet? The technical details are out there. All you need to do is package it for idiots. Then hire a lawyer for when you get sued.

  9. that wacky Troll-In-Chief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is Legere smoking now?

  10. Been a customer for over a decade by el_smurfo · · Score: 1

    But I sure wouldn't switch to T-Mobile now if I wasn't. Used to be, mediocre coverage, great, affordable plans. Now it's Binge-on, T-Mobile Tuesdays, goofy plans...you can only paper over your poor coverage with gimmicks for so long before you have to build your network out. If they ever cancel my Grandfathered plan, it's MVNO all the way for me.

  11. Use the Tmobile Music Unlimited prepaid plan by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's $50 ($55 with tax).

    I get unlimited music and 1 gig of data.

    Recently right as the month ends I'm hitting 900mb (and that's with youtube videos).

    They tried to upsell me to the post paid plan.

    It was $70 ($77 with tax). And otherwise the same plan.

    I looked at the salesperson and explained my plan again.

    She went, "oh.. right" and stopped.

    Do you have a great plan to recommend? I'd love to hear it. Every month, I have the option of changing plans or even services. I love it.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:Use the Tmobile Music Unlimited prepaid plan by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      I'm on the T-Mobile pay-as-you-go plan. $30 a month ($30 period, no extra taxes) for "unlimited" data (throttled after 5GB per month), unlimited texts, and 100 minutes per month.

      In the three years i've been using the plan i've gone over the 100 minutes once when i was on a business trip. Ended up spending about $30 extra that month (i believe the extra rate is 10 cents/minute.)

      I may have gone over the 5GB data limit a couple times near the end of the month, but either it was a short enough period or the throttling wasn't severe enough such that i really didn't notice it.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    2. Re: Use the Tmobile Music Unlimited prepaid plan by dugancent · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same plan, it has binge-on and music streaming. I don't watch video on my phone but I do use audio a lot. I buy refills with my target redcard, which gives 5% off and no sales tax. I do talk a bit, but Google voice or Vonage takes care of that.

      Cell service, to me, isn't worth much more than $1/day.

      --
      SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
    3. Re:Use the Tmobile Music Unlimited prepaid plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's a California thing, but I do, in fact, have to pay taxes on that prepaid plan (just under 4 bucks).

      The coverage is terrible (even despite living next to the cap city), but I can't recommend it enough for anyone needing a dirt-cheap price for a super basic, functional plan.

    4. Re:Use the Tmobile Music Unlimited prepaid plan by pghmike4 · · Score: 1

      I thought the postpaid $50 plan is 2 GB + 480p video and free music. I'm on the family plan, which now is 4 phones at 6 GB of data and roll over (and all the usual 480p video, international roaming, etc), for $120. Except when we signed up, we got 10GB/month/phone. But only one of us ever makes it to 6 GB. The nice thing about Simple Choice is that you get to tether the data, which is great when traveling. That's why the new Tmobile 1 plans look so poor: you pay more, and get more data than you need, and lose tethering at any decent speed.

    5. Re:Use the Tmobile Music Unlimited prepaid plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you looked into Ting? It is an MVNO that not too long ago added the option to use T-Mobile's network(they were originally an MVNO of Sprint's network). It is a no contracts, pay for what you use operator so you would have the same flexibility you have now and be able to change at any time. The nice thing about it is if you have a low usage month your bill goes down as well. You don't end up paying for what you didn't use. The reverse is true as well, so it may not make sense for everyone. I think the service is great though.

  12. These are good changes by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

    The daypass thing is mildly more confusing, but I suspect part of the logic is to encourage use of the Binge-On technology, without which towers are likely to get clogged pretty quickly. I also suspect that the soft limit of 27G a month will be torn through pretty quickly by anyone making heavy use of HD video. Go over the 27G and you're "deprioritized" - you'll get full service during quiet times, but you'll be throttled when everyone else is trying to use the network (which is fair, but you probably don't want it to happen to you!)

    The big improvement is that Tethering is now an acceptable half-megabit/s, rather than 2G speeds. That makes "Unlimited tethering" actually useful again.

    The big question for me is how to encourage video streaming companies to sign up to Binge-On if there's no incentive. In theory, they can just transmit 1080p over HTTPS (protocols like DASH are HTTPS friendly) and T-Mobile will never know.

    With the original implementation, the advantage was that your viewers could watch your services without worrying about it coming out of their data. But if data is unlimited...

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:These are good changes by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      without which towers are likely to get clogged pretty quickly.

      Citation needed. Data caps haven't been about network congestion for years. They're purely a money making ploy.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    2. Re: These are good changes by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      For cellular data caps are about network congestion. For terrestrial Internet, congestion can be solved if the provider is willing to throw more money at it. But for cellular, the options for building more capacity for the last mile is building more towers and making each tower less powerful so it serves a smaller area.

      There are two problems with that. It takes years sometimes for municipalities and neighborhoods to approve a tower being built and even if you do have more towers, if you are in a heavily populated area. You still can only have one tower supporting too many people.

      There is a maximum amount of data that can be transferred over a certain amount of bandwidth and not all frequencies are suitable for cell data communications.

    3. Re:These are good changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tests by the EFF and reported on by TechDirt https://www.techdirt.com/blog/netneutrality/articles/20151231/18201233216/t-mobile-is-flat-out-lying-throttling-video-even-though-it-says-not.shtml already talk about HTTPS. Specifically Binge-on simply throttles all encrypted connections. Full stop.

      Also none of this is "good". Zero rating is BS since it is essentially the providers letting you pay them to get around the barrier they erected. Right now Binge-on seems like a good idea because the fee is only the quality of your video. Will that always be the case? Doubtful since the other wireless providers are now charging a premium for them not to throttle your video: https://www.techdirt.com/blog/netneutrality/articles/20160822/05475735301/t-mobile-sprint-tap-dance-over-under-around-net-neutrality.shtml

    4. Re:These are good changes by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Binge-on isn't a data cap, it's a bandwidth limiter.

      If you think that 10+ phones using DASH, RTSP, etc, to try to stream an HD video (5Mbps+) out of a single 50Mbps LTE tower, isn't going to cause severe problems for everyone else using that tower, then you have a strange understanding of network protocols and video protocols in particular.

      I'd also like to know where the "money making ploy" is in a system that gives you unlimited video for free if you're willing to stream it at lower, DVD-quality, bitrates.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re: These are good changes by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      This argument reminds me of having to explain to junior developers why they don't need to use a binary search on an array size of 10.

      Everything you have just said is correct, but none of it proves that data caps are actually necessary to combat congestion. In your theoretical example of an oversubscribed tower, limiting city users to the same arbitrary number of bytes as a rural user with a tower to themselves most of the day does nothing to help. It does make the carrier a lot of money, though.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    6. Re:These are good changes by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      Binge-on isn't a data cap, it's a bandwidth limiter.

      Except there still is a cap. Read the fine print. Past certain usage all your data is throttled.

      If you think that 10+ phones using DASH, RTSP, etc, to try to stream an HD video (5Mbps+) out of a single 50Mbps LTE tower, isn't going to cause severe problems for everyone else using that tower, then you have a strange understanding of network protocols and video protocols in particular.

      Granting your argument for the moment, artificially limiting bandwidth to 1.5Mbps doesn't help a lot. It's not like it's going to suddenly magically allow a tower to support 3x as many users, as there's other factors at play than raw bandwidth. Additionally it doesn't do anything if T-Mobile's crystal ball can't tell you're viewing video. Also additionally, the existing Binge-On has been randomly deciding non-video things are also video, and artificially limiting download speeds.

      I'd also like to know where the "money making ploy" is in a system that gives you unlimited video for free if you're willing to stream it at lower, DVD-quality, bitrates.

      1) The new plans cost more
      2) You can pay more to use the actual bandwidth on your plan
      3) You lack imagination. Once consumers are used to the idea of certain services being zero-rated on their plan, the carriers can start charging services for the privilege.
      If Netflix doesn't use your data cap, and Hulu does, maybe it's not worth keeping that Hulu subscription?
      AT&T has been very upfront about the fact that this is their end goal: charge both ends of the pipe. They haven't found many takers yet. T-Mobile is making the smarter play: convince the customers it's a good idea first and then the providers will have to come on board.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    7. Re: These are good changes by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      The grandparent post I replied to mentioned "towers getting congested". The parent I replied to mentioned "data caps not being necessary". My explanation was regarding *towers getting congested* so the two things were conflated.

      So to be more clear, T-mobile in particular is getting rid of data caps and they are depriotitizing heavy users when towers are congested. Meaning in your example, the rural user would get the full speed, and the user that was under 26Gb would be prioritized over the user who had gone over 26Gb if the tower couldn't handle everyone going at full speed - this seems fair.

    8. Re: These are good changes by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      So to be more clear, T-mobile in particular is getting rid of data caps and they are depriotitizing heavy users when towers are congested.

      I'll believe that when I see it. I've never gone over my T-Mobile data cap, but family members on my plan have, and they can tell the moment it happens, regardless of whether or not they're in a congested area: immediate drop to sub-Edge speeds until the end of the billing cycle.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    9. Re: These are good changes by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      I think you're still confusing two different things.

      As of today, T-mobile has plans that explicitly have data caps with a certain amount of "high speed data" and unlimited plans. If you have a plan with data caps you will always be "throttled" to 2G speeds after you go over your high speed allotment. If you have an unlimited plan your data will be "depriotitized" after you over 26Gb. I've never noticed a slow down once I go over the 26Gb.

      Currently, T-mobile also has "Binge On" if you are watching video from one of the streaming video providers they support (basically all of them) it doesn't count against your high speed data allotment when you're streaming to your phone or tethering. I currently have 5 lines with unlimited high speed data and 14Gb of tethering per line for about $200. The only benefit of Binge On when you have unlimited data is that you can tether another device and stream video without it counting toward your tethering allotment. I've streamed hours of video with my AppleTV tethered to my phone without noticing any slowdown.

      They just announced they are simplifying this to two plans. With T-Mobile One. You get unlimited high speed data that will be "depriotitized" after 26Gb and unlimited tethering that will be "throttled" to 512Kb. With video limited to 480p. T-mobile One Plus will have HD video and unlimited high speed tethering - again with the same depriotitization structure. These will be the only two plans they offer going forward but you can keep your current plan if you want.

  13. TMobile One Plus unlimited tethering by jetkust · · Score: 1

    The biggest part of this news for me is the new T-Mobile One Plus plan which gives you unlimited tethering for $95. I have the original unlimited plan which has 7 gigs of tethering for $80. This may be enough for me to switch plans. The only thing I'm not sure about is the it says the tethering is "non-prioritized" LTE. Was tethering always non-prioritized or should I be expecting slower speeds?

    1. Re:TMobile One Plus unlimited tethering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused. Why would you ever have to pay extra for tethering? How would my carrier ever even know I'm doing it? I have had T-mobile for years and have been tethering the whole time and still pay the same $30/mo. what are you doing wrong?

    2. Re: TMobile One Plus unlimited tethering by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between being "deprioritized" and "throttled". Throttling involves placing a hard limit on the speed of data transmission. Deprioritzation means if traffic is heavy in your location, other people who haven't reached the threshold will get more bandwidth allocated to them than you do.

  14. T-Mobile is playing fire by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 2

    This whole thing is playing havoc with its (relative) coolness reputation.

    1. Re:T-Mobile is playing fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Send more EFF morons to question their network neutrality!

  15. This should be ILLEGAL. by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My basic take it is this. No one especially a data carrier should have any right to inspect packets I PAY to transmit any more then they have the right to randomly search my car without legal cause and search warrant. It should and needs to be ILLEGAL for any data provided to in anyway inspect or log traffic contents or destinations unless it is for purposes of debugging a problem. If they want to meter the amount of data fine, make it clear in the contract, they have no more business knowing what I send and receive then the electric company who powers the routers. Sorry that doesn't allow carries to milk their current networks for every last penny they can stick it to people for , but customers have a right to privacy that includes not having a corporate hack decide which data I'm worthy to receive and what rates, we agree, I pay, end of story. All this traffic inspection is violation of basic privacy and as a society and as consumers we should vehemently oppose it. Perhaps apple and Google should start enabling router based TOR by default on their phones. Sad that it has to come to that, because tor is a bandwidth hog but if carriers aren't going to treat people right that is what everyone should start doing.

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
    1. Re:This should be ILLEGAL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is

    2. Re:This should be ILLEGAL. by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      No one especially a data carrier should have any right to inspect packets I PAY to transmit any more then they have the right to randomly search my car without legal cause and search warrant.

      You're voluntarily entering into a agreement with a private company. YOU are giving them that right when you sign the agreement.

      if they want to meter the amount of data fine, make it clear in the contract

      They do.

      they have no more business knowing what I send and receive

      They don't necessarily know or care what you're sending and receiving either. For most of the streaming providers, the provider has an agreement with T-Mobile to provide a stream of a qualifying nature when served to the t-mobile network. T-mobile doesn't "inspect" the packet anymore than route it to the correct IP address, which gets excluded from your data counter.

      but customers have a right to privacy that includes not having a corporate hack decide which data I'm worthy to receive and what rates, we agree, I pay, end of story.

      In T-mobile's case, if you don't want to get the "SD" streaming feed from a Binge On enabled streaming provider, you just disable Binge On. You get to eat through your data at the rate that you have full control over and get to pay as such. And AFAIK no one is is claiming that they block any traffic.

      All this traffic inspection is violation of basic privacy and as a society and as consumers we should vehemently oppose it.

      Or it's a case of you not actually understanding how it works.

    3. Re:This should be ILLEGAL. by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1

      >>You're voluntarily entering into a agreement with a private company. YOU are giving them that right when you sign the agreement.
      True, however it is not possible to get needed services from any company that doesn't snoop on your data because of a combination of anti-competitive monopolistic collusion shored up by government bureaucracy. You could say the same thing about your bank, by having a bank account you agree to having all your personal business monitored and if you look suspicious your records turns over to police for further investigation, but that doesn't mean it is an end round of privacy laws, especially if there is no other choice for a sufficiently needed product.

      >>> if they want to meter the amount of data fine, make it clear in the contract >>> response They do:
      That's only about half true, you and I know what the contracts mean, but do you really think the average non technical user on the street realize what type of monitoring of their data is done to accomplish the goals in the contract. On top of that if you ask someone in the store to clarify what they do you usually get an incorrect answer "I've tried it out".
      There law should require the contract to have large print say "WE RESERVER THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE,INSPECT AND USE FOR ANY INTERNAL PURPOUSES WE SEE FIT EVERTHING YOU TRANSMIT ACROSS OUR NETWORK, YOU HAVE NO EXPECTED OR IMPLIED RIGHT TO PRIVACY FROM US". ( because that is the reality and most people have no idea about it).

      >>> In T-mobile's case, if you don't want to get the "SD" streaming feed from a Binge On enabled streaming provider, you just disable Binge On. You get to eat through your data at the rate that you have full control over and get to pay as such. And AFAIK no one is is claiming that they block any traffic.

      which in no way mitigates the fact they are looking at my DNS queries and evaluating and logging them in such a way that if the any entity issue a search warrant ( or breaks in) they can go through months of data.

      >> Or it's a case of you not actually understanding how it works.
      No, I've written fire walls for a living and understand networking pretty deeply, not quite a professional network engineer but
      I have worked in security of one form or another all my life. I know what is needed to set up these kinds of features and object to their existence
      on principle and would happily pay a more ( assuming it was something I could afford) for an unlimited connections with guaranteed zero monitoring and active/ regular purge of all non billing related data. More to the point if you stop tracking people billing becomes really easy.

      ( (Cost of network operations + Cost of network maintenance) + %new expansion and development wanted + %profit you want to make)/ total number of network users.

      Every network company has the same costs, and all of them are fixed except for amount for new investment and profit, so all these 'marketing strategies' are really nothing more then a complicated smoke screen to maximize profit, usually by disadvantaging and taking advantage of customer while at the same time compromising their security. If anyone knows of a company that doesn't do that and provides service in the most of the metro United States let me know who my new cell provider is please.

      --
      âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
  16. Reactivating The Day Pass Daily by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Is probably much more in the realm of "it's going to take us x time to code this thing to check for the pass subscription with each attempt and it will bog down the network y amount to make that check every time the user tries to load a video but it will only z time to stick the check in the calls which already talk to the server specifically to handle the passes" than it is "some nefarious marketing and sales shit which doesn't make any sense and will only piss people off."

    1. Re:Reactivating The Day Pass Daily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entire binge on program is nefarious.

      Also really annoying for any video content that is not a crappy TV show.

  17. I'm still unlimited by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    And so far intend to stay that way.

    I don't get throttled. Ever.

    I don't get rate limited. I get HD video all I want, so far.

    I've only gone over 13GB/month once, but no impacts.

    I need to add a line soon, but it won't be these. I'm not ready to sacrifice functionality (video quality) for cost, at least not this formula.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  18. Bitch at your congresscritter by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    Write an angry letter / email / facebook / tweeet and vent your outrage at your congresscritter. Tell them T-Mobile is a sneaky sneak being a sneak!

    Oh snap, they're bought and paid for! They won't listen. They don't give a rat's ass.

    Jump ship. Maybe if enough people dump T-Mobile, they'll get the message.

    Oh snap, you're just a grain of sand in a big beach!

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:Bitch at your congresscritter by sir-gold · · Score: 2

      Unless you intend to give up on cell service entirely, all you are doing is trading one devil for another. Even an MVNO like straight talk isn't an option, since part of your monthly fee is going into the pockets of one of the big 4 to cover tower usage.

  19. Station wagon full of DvDs by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    I think what they are saying is they are going to screw with your latency and data rate such that an HD movie will stutter and an SD will play.

    Basically, they are going to give you unlimited bandwidth in the same sense that a station wagon full of dvds is unlimited bandwidth. Yes there's a very very long latency but when the wagon arrives the delta function is so large that if occupies the entire spectrum. Voila unlimited data with unlimited bandwidth, very high latentcy

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  20. money grab by luther349 · · Score: 1

    i mean it there prices keep going up for the same data packets.

  21. https://www.whitehouse.gov/net-neutrality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    how are any of these data plans even legal?

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/net...

  22. Keep paying while we put up hurdles. by wildstoo · · Score: 1

    Dear Valued T-Mobile Customer,

    Please pay for this service, but don't use it. Seriously, our infrastructure can't support it and we simply can't afford to upgrade. You have no idea of the pressure we're under. I mean we have shareholders to think about, and a stock price to manipulate. Frankly, your data service is the least of our concerns. So, enjoy your unlimited* data, but just... don't use it. Please. Pretend it's not there...

    ...but... y'know... be cool. Keep paying for it. Shareholders, etc. You know how it is.

    Thanks, buddy.

  23. Ironically I have the opposite problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once burned about £50 because, while out in the field and unable to get a wifi connection, I had to activate an add-on data bundle on the T-Mobile SIM in my laptop because I'd hit the PAYG data cap. Unbeknownst to me, once you activate that bundle it *automatically* renews until you run out of money.

    I only found out several months later when I tried to use the SIM internet normally and found all the credit had gone...

    It's funny these packs are so easy to auto-renew when it costs you money, yet are so difficult to auto-renew when it does not...