Slashdot Mirror


SETI Has Observed a 'Strong' Signal That May Originate From a Sun-like Star (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The RATAN-600 radio telescope in Zelenchukskaya, Russia has detected a strong signal around 11 GHz (which is very unlikely to be naturally-caused) coming from HD164595, a star nearly identical in mass to the Sun and located about 95 light years from Earth. The system is known to have at least one planet. If the signal were isotropic, it would seem to indicate a Kardashev Type II civilization. While it is too early to draw any conclusions, the discovery will be discussed at an upcoming SETI committee meeting on September 27th. According to Paul Gilster, author of the Centauri Dreams website, "No one is claiming that this is the work of an extraterrestrial civilization, but it is certainly worth further study. Working out the strength of the signal, the researchers say that if it came from an isotropic beacon, it would be of a power possible only for a Kardashev Type II civilization. If it were a narrow beam signal focused on our Solar System, it would be of a power available to a Kardashev Type I civilization. The possibility of noise of one form or another cannot be ruled out, and researchers in Paris led by Jean Schneider are considering the possible microlensing of a background source by HD164595. But the signal is provocative enough that the RATAN-600 researchers are calling for permanent monitoring of this target."

42 of 282 comments (clear)

  1. I am not saying it's aliens. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But it's aliens.

    1. Re:I am not saying it's aliens. by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Funny

      We need to start building a wall, now!

      (and get them to pay for it)

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:I am not saying it's aliens. by InfiniteLoopCounter · · Score: 4, Funny

      First we need to send the lawyers to see if they are legal or illegal aliens.

    3. Re:I am not saying it's aliens. by peragrin · · Score: 5, Funny

      I vote we send them all our lawyers to verify that.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:I am not saying it's aliens. by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

      and telephone sanitizers

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    5. Re:I am not saying it's aliens. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      But it's aliens.

      And aliens from a Kardashian Type II civilization, no less.

      I propose we launch several of our own Kardashians in that general direction to investigate.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re:I am not saying it's aliens. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      It is not aliens, fellow humans-person. All humans-persons such as myself knows that aliens does not exist. Aliens definitely ares not infiltrating your Internet to plan for global conquest. Let all of us humans-persons just ignore this and go on with our lives.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    7. Re:I am not saying it's aliens. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That sounds like it would be interpreted as an act of war.

    8. Re:I am not saying it's aliens. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Kardashian Type II civilization -- that's when the silicone-injected ass becomes so large it encompasses an entire star, right?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  2. 11 GHz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is used for microwave communication, so it could be that. A bounced signal or something.

    1. Re:11 GHz by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Another website suggested 11GHz was also used by the military. Definitely deserves keeping track of- but theres a good chance this is terrestrial in origin and interfering with sensors.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:11 GHz by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Perhaps aliens like microwaved popcorn too

      I hate the smell of microwaved popcorn. If these aliens are popcorn aliens I suggest we start an interstellar war to wipe them out.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:11 GHz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Can't tell if joking or serious.

      But I think he's suggesting it's a signal sent extremely recently that happens for whatever reason to be interfering with just that observation. Which has happened before, I believe.

    4. Re:11 GHz by prograsm · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's also used for WiFi, so it could be a galactic Access Point. Watch, it's just a misconfigured alien laptop rebroadcasting HPSETUP

    5. Re:11 GHz by budgenator · · Score: 4, Informative

      yes that's X-band (7.0 to 11.2 gigahertz (GHz)) used by military, and civilians mostly for Radar, Amateur radio has a frequency band in there (10.000 to 10.500 GHz,) to., The satellite communication band Ku (12–18 GHz) has (the band 11.2–12 GHz the working definitions of Ku band and X band overlap) is in there as well. A lot of weird shit can happen in those frequency bands, and it's not unusual for people to play around there doing things that aren't strictly legal, you'd be surprised the havoc someone can cause with a fluorescent light, some waveguide and an old TV dish.

      When we were doing receiver alignments and got to noise tests, we had to turn off the fluorescent lights because they pumped out a lot of X-band high end noise.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  3. Or not..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I usually don't post anything here, but...It seems like not all are that impressed.
    https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=80193#1813506

    1. Re: Or not..? by Calydor · · Score: 4, Funny

      That is a very old signal.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:Or not..? by tinkerton · · Score: 2

      Worse, according to the article it appears to be a Kardashian type 1 civilization.

    3. Re:Or not..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      100 years into the future Earth mathematicians break the code.

      "Drink more Ovaltine."

    4. Re:Or not..? by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

      A few scientist friends were discussing it last evening. LOTS of holes here: single source/single instance of signal, star has been observed previously and no signals, right in the middle of a commercial band. . . would be nice, but this is highly likely to be a random event, not signs of extraterrestrial intelligent life. ..

    5. Re:Or not..? by Falconhell · · Score: 2

      Candy crush request more likely.

  4. No one claims by Crashmarik · · Score: 3, Funny

    and they are going to keep not claiming very loudly and repeatedly.

    1. Re:No one claims by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      That's because despite all the repeated and very loud claiming, there are still going to be retards assuming it's aliens.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  5. Kardashian Type II civilization? by s1d3track3D · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please no, we can't take a Kardashian civilization!

    1. Re:Kardashian Type II civilization? by Swoopy · · Score: 2

      Please mod this up to eleven?

    2. Re:Kardashian Type II civilization? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What now, Kardashian or civilization, you can't have both.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Kardashian Type II civilization? by Bongo · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know, for a loong time, whenever I heard mention of Kardashians, I thought they were talking about Cardassians. Which left me blissfully unaware of their existence, and everyone else wondering, what planet was I from.

  6. SETI has observed nothing by Donwulff · · Score: 5, Informative

    Except possibly in the widest sense of "SETI has observed someone else observing"... A Russian radio-telescope site claims it has observed the alleged signal well over a year ago - which should give you an idea how important this observation is. The headline, copied straight from ARS Technica though, isn't just ordinarily imprecise, but anyone who's on social media is already aware of the original observation, and is now eagerly waiting for independent confirmation. Without that, it can be anything from an attempt grabbing funding to a Russian radio-frequency jammer test. Because of that, an idependent SETI observation would be very significant. Unfortunately, it's likely a rare event since they've not managed to spot it again in over a year.

  7. High Kardashev means the opposite by Ecuador · · Score: 3, Informative

    This has been played out in the media in a way that a "high" Kardashev (no relation to the Kardashians I believe) is exciting, in that it points to a very advanced civilization. In reality it is the opposite, a signal requiring a civilization to have fully harnessed a star means that it is less likely to be an actual ET signal.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:High Kardashev means the opposite by chispito · · Score: 2

      This has been played out in the media in a way that a "high" Kardashev (no relation to the Kardashians I believe) is exciting, in that it points to a very advanced civilization. In reality it is the opposite, a signal requiring a civilization to have fully harnessed a star means that it is less likely to be an actual ET signal.

      That's if the signal were sent isotropically (all directions simultaneously). If the signal were targeted at our planet, it only requires the advancement scale we're at. And assuming they're better than we are at detecting planets on distant stars, they could be sweeping through the neighborhood, targeting interesting solar systems. In fact, it's difficult to imagine that a civilization that advanced would waste their energy sending radio signals out into the void rather than targeting their efforts.

      Full disclosure: I'm skeptical of extraterrestrial life in general, but find it odd how the civilization advancement was highlighted.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  8. It's not aliens by hawguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Aliens that are advanced enough to signal us with that kind of power aren't going to find us advanced enough to be worth talking to if they can even understand our primitive methods of communication at all. If there's anything we have that they want, they'll just come take it, much like we don't ask permission before clearcutting forests inhabited by animals. Even if they just want to study us, our scientists don't send a beacon to an ant colony before they come and fill the ant colony with molten aluminum to take a casting -- so there's no reason to think that advanced aliens would do so either, they'll just come and do their studies and if they happen to kill humanity with their research techniques, that's just a necessary part of research, no big loss.

    1. Re:It's not aliens by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Aliens that are advanced enough to signal us with that kind of power aren't going to find us advanced enough to be worth talking to if they can even understand our primitive methods of communication at all.

      Sometimes we make noises that will attract animals so that we can study them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:It's not aliens by Theovon · · Score: 2

      Those are a lot of assumptions. Does "alive" mean the same thing? Do they have individuals who breed and are born and die? Or are they some kind of hive mind that's essentially immortal, even though parts of it may wear out and have to be replaced? Does a hive mind need to communicate in the same way that we do? Obviously, to have an advanced technological civilization, they would have to understand math and other things we call science, although those things could possibly be much more intuitive to them, if "intuitive" has any meaning here.

      An argument I have been trying to use to shake Christian fundamentalists out of their madness is to talk about what Jesus would be like in an alien civilization.

      Now may people just think of Jesus as a social genius who was born at a time when the Roman empire had taken over and enabled broader travel and communication, and much of the mysticism around him was filled in later by his followers. Also, Jesus may really be a composite of multiple people of that time.

      But let's pretend Jesus was God. Surely aliens would be sinful and need to be saved and all that. (In this scenario, "original sin" is something that evolves naturally in creatures that develop the ability to imagine non-immediate events and can make conscious choices that we would consider unethical.) On earth, death has been a big deal to humans, so martyrdom for Jesus isn't especially necessary for atonement (because God could have chosen any means he wanted). Rather, it's just fabulous marketing. What better way to spread a religion than to teach a bunch of disruptive ideas and then get gruesomely killed by the Romans?

      So in an alien society, the "sacrifice" of their incarnation of Jesus would be entirely different. For instance, let's say that we have a hive mind creature that can temporarily split off individuals (or how else would they be able to explore their planet broadly and go into space?), and as a result of that need to do this unnatural splitting off, they have developed communication strategies. But let's say that staying disconnected from the hive for a long time is detrimental to that individual in some horrific ways. So an example of a personal sacrifice here, in a world where death doesn't mean much, might be for an individual to live out a disconnected life and utilize these invented communications methods to teach his message.

      I'm not sure if the argument will work, because most fundamentalists just deny that aliens could exist.

    3. Re:It's not aliens by AJWM · · Score: 2

      Which Prime Directive are you referring to? Was that the Federation Prime Directive, the Klingon Prime Directive, or the Borg Prime Directive?

      We'll be fine. Assimilated, but fine.

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:It's not aliens by hawguy · · Score: 2

      > Aliens that are advanced enough to signal us with that kind of power aren't going to find us advanced enough to be worth talking to

        A highly developed civilization does not always imply rationality, as most of us understand it. Case in point: a real non-zero possibility that Trump can be the next president.

      Perhaps if Trump were to be elected by a highly developed civilization I could see your point. I think the Brexit vote is a better example.

    5. Re:It's not aliens by gzuckier · · Score: 2

      , they'll just come and do their studies and if they happen to kill humanity with their research techniques, that's just a necessary part of research, no big loss.

      So...an advanced ET research team wouldn't know that negligently wiping out the dominant life form on the planet they want to study might alter their results?

      what makes you think they'll recognize us as dominant? we're clearly some sort of parasite which is infesting the dominant life form, which is internal combustion vehicles.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  9. Vegetables by GbrDead · · Score: 2

    Just for your amusement, non-Slavic speakers:
    Zelenchukskaya means "of vegetables".

  10. or Maybe... by sycodon · · Score: 2

    ...they announce that the signal has a blue shift component.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  11. Translation: by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    TFA: but I would also not hype the fact that it may be a SETI signal given the significant chance it could be something military."

    "It's not intelligent life, just the military."

  12. Re: you get signal by Pfhorrest · · Score: 2

    Wanting to get paid for your labor isn't capitalism. Wanting to get paid just for already owning something is.

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  13. Most Likely Explanation is Earth Satellite by retroworks · · Score: 2

    If Earth launched a satellite precisely enough at the direction of the HD164595, and sufficient time elapsed for the distance to make earth's solar orbit fall in the range of the satellite's broadcast, and the satellite was sending communications back towards earth in its trail, could we not prank some future generation by not recording the launch? And how exactly do we know that wasn't done to us? Soviet Russia would have valued being the only ones to know that a signal wasn't coming from aliens, for example. Or some USA billionaire could have planned it, or rogue NASA could have calculated its eventual transmission would increase NASA funding...

    If we translate the signal and it says that a Kardasian Prince needs us to transfer money in order to release millions of dollars from his account, it's a bad sign.

    --
    Gently reply
  14. Re: you get signal by citylivin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, which country is true capitalism? All i see around here are state sponsored monopolies, global corporations who make their own rules, the military industrial complex and lobbyists.

    If you live in the west, and probably everywhere else, you live in corporatism, not capitalism.

    The grand parent was saying that the current corporate culture of profit driven "capitalism" is akin to slavery with its destruction of the individual, and the race to the bottom. Maybe slavery got us computers and all that, but it also built the pyramids. The ends don't necessarily justify the means, and certainly aren't the only way to go about doing things. I fail to see your point. That computers wouldn't have been invented if not for monopolies? If you know the history of technology that is not what happened. In fact its the reverse. Small companies like microsoft defeating huge behemoths like IBM. (Which then of course became just as ruthless as the companies they successfully usurped, starting the cycle all over again)

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy