India's Richest Man Launches 4G LTE Network, Offers Unlimited Free Voice Calls (mashable.com)

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

India's Richest Man Launches 4G LTE Network, Offers Unlimited Free Voice Calls (mashable.com)

Posted by msmash on Thursday September 1, 2016 @02:11AM from the wow dept.

An anonymous reader writes: India's biggest industrial house has launched its 4G LTE network and is offering unlimited free voice calls forever to anyone who signs up for its services. It is also claiming to offer the cheapest 4G LTE data rates in the world. After numerous delays and months of testing, India's richest man, Mukesh Ambani, today announced the commercial availability of Reliance Jio's mobile services. The conglomerate's Jio services, which users can avail starting Sept. 5, is offering a nation-wide LTE network coverage, coupled with free voice plans and best data tariff Indian consumers have ever seen. Jio's network is being touted as the largest 4G LTE deployment anywhere in the world, Ambani said, adding that the network is also "future proof" with baked in support for upcoming 5G and 6G network technologies. Jio's 4G coverage is available in 18,000 cities in the country, and over 200,000 remote areas. The company aims to extend the coverage to 90 percent of India's population by next year. Reliance Industries has invested $22 billion in Jio, and has been working on the roll-out for last five years.

92 comments

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Free voice calls by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 02:14 · Score: 0

That's easy when nobody uses voice anymore.
I can't even remember the last person I spoke with that wasn't a telemarketer or some kind of recorded spam.
1. Re:Free voice calls by unixisc · 2016-09-01 03:00 · Score: 1
  
  Not true in India. Having visited there quite a bit, people are always on their cellphones - talking, texting/WhatsApp'ing and FaceBook
2. Re: Free voice calls by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 03:18 · Score: 0
  
  Still a great service to offer to people who might not be able to afford anything else.
  Might allow them to start a business or something too.
3. Re:Free voice calls by Maritz · 2016-09-01 03:26 · Score: 1
  
  That's easy when nobody uses voice anymore.
  I can't even remember the last person I spoke with that wasn't a telemarketer or some kind of recorded spam.
  Looks like you went and generalised from your case to everybody. It's led you astray here. Loads and loads of people make loads and loads of calls. Every day.
  
  --
  I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
4. Re:Free voice calls by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 03:41 · Score: 0
  
  That's easy when nobody uses voice anymore.
  I can't even remember the last person I spoke with that wasn't a telemarketer or some kind of recorded spam.
  Yeah, that's what happens when you don't know anyone in real life and you never leave your mommy's basement.
  But for us regular humans, lots of us make and receive voice calls.
5. Re:Free voice calls by JustAnotherOldGuy · 2016-09-01 03:43 · Score: 1
  
  That's easy when nobody uses voice anymore.
  I can't even remember the last person I spoke with that wasn't a telemarketer or some kind of recorded spam.
  Yes, that must be why AT&T and Sprint are shutting down their voice service and going to text-only.
  
  --
  Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
6. Re:Free voice calls by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 04:02 · Score: 1
  
  [Citation needed]
7. Re:Free voice calls by haruchai · 2016-09-01 04:03 · Score: 1
  
  Yeah, that's what happens when you don't know anyone in real life and you never leave your mommy's basement.
  But for us regular humans, lots of us make and receive voice calls.
  We regular humans also get a lot of info out of voice that's not easily extractable from text.
  And the voices, tones, timbre & pitch of so many of my female friends are beautiful and can't be replaced with "Lol, how rlly awesom3 :-D"
  
  --
  Pain is merely failure leaving the body
8. Re:Free voice calls by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 04:12 · Score: 0
  
  Wonder if you could use this as an acoustic modem for data...
9. Re:Free voice calls by Anne+Thwacks · 2016-09-01 04:25 · Score: 1
  
  Why not, if you are happy with 110 baud? (They are very flakey at 300 baud).
  
  --
  Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
10. Re:Free voice calls by SScorpio · 2016-09-01 04:41 · Score: 1
  
  Ford Sync is doing something like that. The car can do monthly system diagnostic checks. When it sends them out, it does a voice call instead of relying on the phone having a data connection.
No way! by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 02:17 · Score: 0

Where do I get my free SIM card?
http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-...
1. Re:No way! by unixisc · 2016-09-01 03:01 · Score: 1
  
  In India, SIM cards are never free, unless they happen to come in the box in which your phone comes
Kingsman by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 02:20 · Score: 1

some kind of evil plan?
Valentine, is that you? by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 02:20 · Score: 0

Valentine, is that you?
I saw that movie... by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 02:20 · Score: 1

You'll go wild for this cell service. It'll blow your mind!
Advertisement? by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 02:21 · Score: 0

Sounds like an advertisement this ...
1. Re:Advertisement? by unixisc · 2016-09-01 03:02 · Score: 1
  
  But wouldn't it be strange posting an ad for a service that's only available in India on a site primarily read in the US?
Not free by sjbe · 2016-09-01 02:22 · Score: 3, Insightful

India's biggest industrial house has launched its 4G LTE network and is offering unlimited free voice calls forever to anyone who signs up for its services.
If there is a monthly fee for the service then they aren't free. On a unit cost basis (per call) it might be cheap if someone makes a lot of calls but it isn't free. If the network has enough bandwidth the marginal cost of allowing additional calls within the network is a good approximation of zero. There is an upper cap to the amount of bandwidth a single phone can use for voice calling so once the network exceeds that capability there really is no reason to bill by the minute anymore.

Ambani said, adding that the network is also "future proof" with baked in support for upcoming 5G and 6G network technologies.
Sounds like puffery to me.
1. Re:Not free by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 02:27 · Score: 0
  
  If there is a monthly fee for the service then they aren't free.
  It means no additional charge for calls, regardless of how many you make. In contrast to the "$129.99 monthly fee and 18.5 minutes of voice, $2.24 each additional minute of fraction thereof" model.
2. Re:Not free by mjwx · 2016-09-01 02:49 · Score: 1
  
  India's biggest industrial house has launched its 4G LTE network and is offering unlimited free voice calls forever to anyone who signs up for its services.
  If there is a monthly fee for the service then they aren't free. On a unit cost basis (per call) it might be cheap if someone makes a lot of calls but it isn't free. If the network has enough bandwidth the marginal cost of allowing additional calls within the network is a good approximation of zero. There is an upper cap to the amount of bandwidth a single phone can use for voice calling so once the network exceeds that capability there really is no reason to bill by the minute anymore.
  By the sounds of it, the way it's being advertised, you pay for network access only (the ability to connect to the network) with maybe text included, voice and data are add on packs. This is not the first country I've seen this done in.
  
  Not everything is advertised in overpriced plans like in the US. Currently paying GBP 12 a month for 2 GB of data (plus some minutes and texts I don't use) on PAYG.
  
  Now the real profit for this telco comes from the customer data that will be sold and the ads that will be sent to customers and injected in their page loads. This crap is, sadly commonplace in most developing countries.
  
  Ambani said, adding that the network is also "future proof" with baked in support for upcoming 5G and 6G network technologies.
  Sounds like puffery to me.
  In other words, standard marketspeak.
  
  I've never heard a telco advertise an obsolete network even when it's years behind everyone else. Not so long ago in Oz, 2mbit ADSL was "Super Fast(TM)". Kind of laughing at Australia now I live in the UK and get 150mbit fibre, I shouldn't, but those idiots voted in the LNP twice so I'm revelling in the schadenfreude
  
  --
  Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
3. Re:Not free by mark-t · 2016-09-01 02:53 · Score: 1
  
  Even with a fee for the service, if it does not matter how often or how much you use that service, it amortizes to being effectively free. The limit of some fixed positive number over x as x approaches infinity is zero. If the fixed positive number is small enough relative to average income levels, then even the fixed cost is inconsequential.
  
  --
  File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
4. Re:Not free by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 03:03 · Score: 1
  
  Good job on having that in England. You must be very proud. This article is about a new thing in India though. Maybe the next article will be about you. Then we can talk about the things you have.
5. Re:Not free by unixisc · 2016-09-01 03:04 · Score: 2
  
  What does the phone plan of a cellular provider have to do w/ the type of society a country is?
6. Re:Not free by asliarun · 2016-09-01 03:55 · Score: 1
  
  The real question is - do you have VOIP integrated with your cellphone and your phone number? To my knowledge, every single cellphone service provider charges separately for voice, and this is always a mandatory charge. Even Google Fi which uses VOIP for voice calls charges $20 a month for voice, and then $10 a month for every 1GB used (which rolls over).
  Nobody offers a cellphone with a phone number where you are only charged for data usage and for nothing else. At least to my knowledge. As such, what Jio is doing in India is what all wireless telecom companies will be doing in the future. Especially since the entire backhaul is IP based anyway. They will all become ISPs.
7. Re:Not free by quenda · 2016-09-01 04:19 · Score: 1
  
  The real question is - do you have VOIP integrated with your cellphone and your phone number?
  The old Nokias had VoIP fully integrated. With Android, it needs a 3rd party app, but is semi-integrated.
  With LTE, aren't all voice calls packet-switched anyway?
8. Re:Not free by SlaveToTheGrind · 2016-09-01 04:41 · Score: 1
  
  If the network has enough bandwidth the marginal cost of allowing additional calls within the network is a good approximation of zero. There is an upper cap to the amount of bandwidth a single phone can use for voice calling so once the network exceeds that capability there really is no reason to bill by the minute anymore.
  This is one of those statements that's tantalizingly close to right in theory, but badly wrong in the real world.
  First, wireless providers don't design systems to have oodles of unused bandwidth sitting around at any given time -- that would force them to charge subscribers more for no perceived benefit. So for a real-world system that is running close to capacity, an extended burst of voice traffic caused by a bunch of people making long phone calls all at the same time because... free (think about how people used to modify their calling behavior to get inside a cell provider's "free nights and weekends" envelope), is just about the furthest thing from "a good approximation of zero" you can get.
  Second, the net effect on other data traffic is much worse than the voice data's actual percentage of the bandwidth, because the networks give voice traffic a higher priority because of latency requirements.
  The net result of all this is that the cost of the data plans will have to factor in the increase in voice traffic due to unmetered voice calls -- there is no free lunch. Not surprisingly, TFA tells us that's exactly how it already works in India:
  
  The world's second most populous nation, India, already has some of the cheapest voice calling plans but data remains expensive for most subscribers.
  I'll be curious how the data rates for this new service actually pan out if/when its billionaire owner stops effectively subsidizing them.
9. Re:Not free by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 09:04 · Score: 0
  
  Operators that have built over 3G networks still kind of rely on a feature called CSFallback, in which they move to 3G/2G to make voice calls. IMS voice (packet switched calls) are not fully deployed.
  I guess Reliance JIO planned with IMS voice. Would be interesting to see how voice calls perform in its networks.
10. Re:Not free by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 10:45 · Score: 0
  
  >>>>Ambani said, adding that the network is also "future proof" with baked in support for upcoming 5G and 6G network technologies.
  >>Sounds like puffery to me.
  Have you heard of SDR - Software Defined Radio ? ...with this one can future proof the h/w for most wireless communication technologies
  5G or XG ...need to become SDR based for ensure technologies are future proof and hardware devices/Towers are more eco-friendly as they don't need to replaced/changed that often
11. Re: Not free by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 18:53 · Score: 0
  
  "How many bloody g's ARE there?"
Re: My mom still call me by JcMorin · 2016-09-01 02:23 · Score: 1

My mother would still pick up the phone and call me. I agree with you it's in decline but I would not rule that out yet... the number of phone call per day is still very high!
For customer service... by seven+of+five · 2016-09-01 02:29 · Score: 1, Troll

He'll set up a cut-rate call center in Atlanta, and tell the good 'ol boys to answer the phone as 'Arnav,' 'Sai,' and 'Vihaan'...
1. Re:For customer service... by houghi · 2016-09-01 02:53 · Score: 1
  
  Obviously, as you can work people to death and don't have to give them days off and when they are free, you can still ask them to come in. Just got a kid? I do not care, work and leave the kid to die or don't work and it starves.
  And if you complain, you are a communist.
  
  --
  Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
2. Re:For customer service... by unixisc · 2016-09-01 03:06 · Score: 1
  
  They have people working in shifts, so nobody works the way you are describing. Talking about the companies here - Reliance, Airtel, Tata, et al
3. Re:For customer service... by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 03:35 · Score: 0
  
  He'll set up a cut-rate call center in Atlanta, and tell the good 'ol boys to answer the phone as 'Arnav,' 'Sai,' and 'Vihaan'...
  That would be defined as "reverse outsourcing".
4. Re:For customer service... by asliarun · 2016-09-01 03:58 · Score: 1
  
  He'll set up a cut-rate call center in Atlanta, and tell the good 'ol boys to answer the phone as 'Arnav,' 'Sai,' and 'Vihaan'...
  That would be defined as "reverse outsourcing".
  Why would it be reverse anything? It would just be outsourcing.
forever ? by ardmhacha · 2016-09-01 02:37 · Score: 3, Interesting

"offering unlimited free voice calls forever to anyone who signs up for its services"
A promise that cannot be kept.
1. Re:forever ? by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 03:59 · Score: 0
  
  "offering unlimited free voice calls forever to anyone who signs up for its services"
  A promise that cannot be kept.
  Maybe he made the promise at Chuck E. Cheese?
2. Re:forever ? by Duhfus · 2016-09-01 04:12 · Score: 1
  
  While they likely won't keep this promise, I don't understand why this promise can't be kept.
  Their announced model seems to be charge for data and not for calls or text. Why is this not viable?
3. Re:forever ? by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 23:26 · Score: 0
  
  Because it is unlikely that it will stay in effect in 3,2 billion years.
  Forever is a very long time. So while it's a promise that can be kept it is so very likely that it won't be that you might aswell say it can't be kept.
Was this not a plot in a movie recently? by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 02:38 · Score: 0

Something with Colin Firth in it?
1. Re:Was this not a plot in a movie recently? by sudden.zero · 2016-09-01 02:51 · Score: 1
  
  Yes, it was called "The Kingsmen: The Secret Service"
2. Re:Was this not a plot in a movie recently? by WindBourne · 2016-09-01 12:29 · Score: 1
  
  that depends on how many ppl die using it.
  If none, then no, it was not.
  
  --
  I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
Free voice does not mean free plan by mark-t · 2016-09-01 02:44 · Score: 1

Lots of posts so far referencing Kingsman, but I would think that this only means that the number of voice calls or how long you talk does not create any additional cost to whatever fixed rate you pay everything that is bundled with the service.
I have free unlimited calls nationwide on my cell phone plan too... but I still pay for it, One fixed monthly rate... It's not that big a deal.

--
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
1. Re:Free voice does not mean free plan by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 03:40 · Score: 0
  
  considering we pay $80 plus taxes for voice service on three feature phones (and that is without nationwide roaming or unlimited minutes.. that would be something like $30-35 more and take us off our old pre-verizon plan), chopping off voice calls from the bill and charging a measly 75 cents for a gigabyte of data sounds like a hell of a deal.
  india must not have ridiculous baked-in per-line taxes, fees and other 'mandatory' charges for voice and not have the stupid money merry-go-round between carriers for each voice call.. so they can basically eliminate voice from phone plans completely. it's a wonderful idea. the u.s. will never see such a thing.
2. Re:Free voice does not mean free plan by asliarun · 2016-09-01 04:02 · Score: 1
  
  considering we pay $80 plus taxes for voice service on three feature phones (and that is without nationwide roaming or unlimited minutes.. that would be something like $30-35 more and take us off our old pre-verizon plan), chopping off voice calls from the bill and charging a measly 75 cents for a gigabyte of data sounds like a hell of a deal.
  india must not have ridiculous baked-in per-line taxes, fees and other 'mandatory' charges for voice and not have the stupid money merry-go-round between carriers for each voice call.. so they can basically eliminate voice from phone plans completely. it's a wonderful idea. the u.s. will never see such a thing.
  Try Google Fi which uses VOIP but is integrated with your phone and you get a phone number just like a conventional phone. They still charge you $20 a month for voice and $10 for 1GB but you do get the benefits of VOIP such as national/international roaming for free, very low priced international calling rates etc.
  But yes, this is all made possible because Jio has its own backhaul network that is entirely IP packet based. This is what telecoms will become in the future. ISPs.
3. Re:Free voice does not mean free plan by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 04:19 · Score: 0
  
  Dude, you are still getting hosed at $80. You need to get off Verizon and look at much cheaper MVNOs. There are lots of them, riding on top of all the major carriers including Verizon. Go spend some time at HowardForums.com and peruse the Prepaid forums. You'll find lots of suggestions and you can save a ton of money.
4. Re:Free voice does not mean free plan by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 10:34 · Score: 0
  
  find me one that can do 1000 minutes (should be more because would lose mobile-to-mobile and mycircle x10) pooled between three feature phones, no text or data needed, on verizon's full (i.e. includes acquired alltel network) network or us cellular's. those are the ONLY ONES HERE.. GSM does not exist here and sprint roams for voice (their own nearest towers are 100 miles away) -- and only verizon or ussc can provide local numbers or port our existing... for less than 80 total....
  maybe find a prepaid for 25 per phone, but that's not worth switching for. everything else is 30+ a line because either have to go big or unlimited on minutes (on each line) because most don't pool your allotments across multiple lines. and of course we would need new hardware, have setup / activation charges / etc etc.
  ting would be awesome (36 total per month plus tax).. hell, we would sell ting ourselves... IF, for cdma voice, they were a verizon reseller instead of a sprint one that roams on verizon.
"Baked in" before they decide on recipe? by daboochmeister · 2016-09-01 02:44 · Score: 3, Informative

The 5G spec isn't stable yet, and isn't the 6G spec just a glint in someone's eye at this point? Not sure how he could have "baked in" support for them yet ...

--
"Ahh! I see you're in that indeterminate Schrodinger state where - oh, uh ... never mind." Dave Bucci
1. Re:"Baked in" before they decide on recipe? by mark-t · 2016-09-01 02:56 · Score: 1
  
  This is kinda what I was wondering about here too.... it makes me a bit suspect that something is going on that isn't kosher.
  
  --
  File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
2. Re:"Baked in" before they decide on recipe? by unixisc · 2016-09-01 03:08 · Score: 1
  
  Wouldn't buying extra frequency bands cover for it? Unless 5G and 6G completely changes the way data is transmitted from RF signals to, say, UV signals or something?
3. Re:"Baked in" before they decide on recipe? by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 04:17 · Score: 2, Insightful
  
  The 5G spec isn't stable yet, and isn't the 6G spec just a glint in someone's eye at this point? Not sure how he could have "baked in" support for them yet ...
  This could just mean that the backhaul to the towers will support the higher data rates.
4. Re:"Baked in" before they decide on recipe? by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 04:41 · Score: 0
  
  Anything to get a 100 Million customers!!
5. Re:"Baked in" before they decide on recipe? by Scarred+Intellect · 2016-09-01 05:08 · Score: 1
  
  The 5G spec isn't stable yet, and isn't the 6G spec just a glint in someone's eye at this point? Not sure how he could have "baked in" support for them yet ...
  It's easy. You've already got the tower!
  All you have to do is change the equipment, data lines, power lines, and antennas!
  Or maybe "baked in" support means the tower supports are literally baked in clay...
6. Re:"Baked in" before they decide on recipe? by unixisc · 2016-09-01 06:07 · Score: 1
  
  Does equipment always need to get changed, or would firmware/software updates take care of what's needed? I'm assuming that data lines and power lines won't be different for 5G and 6G, or would they?
7. Re:"Baked in" before they decide on recipe? by Scarred+Intellect · 2016-09-01 07:22 · Score: 1
  
  I really don't know. Depends on power consumption, more data means more power...might have to upgrade to bigger/more power lines to the devices...maybe that's what they've already accounted for. Same with data lines.
8. Re:"Baked in" before they decide on recipe? by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 10:47 · Score: 0
  
  The 5G spec isn't stable yet, and isn't the 6G spec just a glint in someone's eye at this point? Not sure how he could have "baked in" support for them yet ...
  Have you heard of SDR - Software Defined Radio ? ...with this one can future proof the h/w for most wireless communication technologies
  5G or any XG ...need to become SDR based to ensure technologies are future proof and hardware devices/Towers are more eco-friendly as they don't need to replaced/changed that often
9. Re:"Baked in" before they decide on recipe? by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 11:03 · Score: 0
  
  Because LTE was a massive project to align mobile telephony and I data networks in such a way that all future upgrades would be as simple as swapping out a wifi router.
  It's because of the specific work done creating LTE years ago and has nothing to do with this carrier's work.
10. Re:"Baked in" before they decide on recipe? by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 11:58 · Score: 0
  
  Some replies here kinda miss the point. This is just marketing (aka professional legalised lying).
Re:Great just what we need by houghi · 2016-09-01 02:49 · Score: 1

Most likely no international calls as that would mean he needs to pay others that do the connection. For international calls VoIP will still be much cheaper. Look around and you get unlimited callsfor free for 6 months when you pay 10USD and then you pay 1c per minute till your 10USD is gone, adding anothter 1000 minutes.

--
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
The real question is... by sudden.zero · 2016-09-01 02:49 · Score: 1

...will Eggsy save the world this time?
Re:Great just what we need by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 02:51 · Score: 0

Unlimited calls for "free" when you pay? Marketing departments have done a real number on you!
Nice piece by campuscodi · 2016-09-01 02:52 · Score: 1

That's some good reporting right there. Nice job Manish!
Sounds like the plot to the movie Kingsman by JoeyRox · 2016-09-01 02:54 · Score: 1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
This is different from Reliance's other mobile? by unixisc · 2016-09-01 02:58 · Score: 1

For those who don't know, Reliance is already one of the leading telecom companies in India. Already offers both GSM and CDMA services. Just wondering - how is Jio different, other than being 4G?
And they are still way behind Airtel, which has had 4G for the last 3 years.
1. Re:This is different from Reliance's other mobile? by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 03:41 · Score: 1
  
  There are TWO reliance companies in India.
  Reliance ADAG (Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group) that owns the incumbent Reliance Communications that is the one you are mentioning isn't doing well.
  Second Reliance is Reliance MDAG (Mukesh DAG) that owns RIL - Reliance Industries Limited, that has launched Reliance Jio.
  So, from Sept 5th there will be TWO reliance companies offering telecom in India:
  Reliance Communications
  Reliance Jio.
Still a lie by sjbe · 2016-09-01 03:00 · Score: 1

It means no additional charge for calls, regardless of how many you make.
No shit Sherlock. It's still a lie. The calls are not and could not be free. It just means that they pay a fixed cost instead of a variable cost but there still is a cost. I don't think anyone is confused but it is false to say it is free.
Bounded by sjbe · 2016-09-01 03:07 · Score: 1

Even with a fee for the service, if it does not matter how often or how much you use that service, it amortizes to being effectively free.
If you make one phone call per billing cycle the price does not amortize to even close to free. Even if you use it a lot the price per call might be cheap but it will not and cannot be free. It might be inconsequential but it isn't zero.

The limit of some fixed positive number over x as x approaches infinity is zero.
There is an upper bound on the number of minutes a phone can be used in a billing cycle. Infinity does not ever come into the discussion. To make up some bogus numbers for a 28 day billing cycle, the most a phone could possibly be used is 40,320 minutes if it was used 24/7. If the flat fee per month is $100 then the per minute rate is effectively $0.00248. Very cheap to be sure but not free.
1. Re:Bounded by mark-t · 2016-09-01 04:34 · Score: 1
  
  If you make one phone call per billing cycle the price does not amortize to even close to free.
  True, but if you are on a month-to-month plan and not using a burner phone, then you are spending that money anyway. It becomes part of your monthly cost of living.
  If you prefer to use a burner instead of paying every month for a service, that's fine... but not everyone does that.
  
  --
  File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
Casting starts now... by fahrbot-bot · 2016-09-01 03:21 · Score: 1

Samuel L. Jackson will probably play him in the inevitable biopic.

--
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
Unlimited unlimited? by kimgkimg · 2016-09-01 03:45 · Score: 1

So is that "Unlimited" unlimited, or Unlimited unlimited?
1. Re:Unlimited unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 04:16 · Score: 0
  
  Most likely "Unlimited up to a reasonable limit"
2. Re:Unlimited unlimited? by Anne+Thwacks · 2016-09-01 04:27 · Score: 1
  
  Don't forget, "forever" in Telco-speak means "10 days, or till our shares value is affected, which ever is first".
  
  --
  Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
The Kingsman by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 03:54 · Score: 0

Isn't this the plot to "The Kingsman"? Why aren't people more concerned about this? Is Samuel L Jackson the richest man in India?
Kingsmen by whoozwah · 2016-09-01 04:05 · Score: 1

this sounds suspiciously like the plot from "The Kingsmen"
1. Re:Kingsmen by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 06:19 · Score: 0
  
  Yeah, here's the "secret" plot:
  
  The company says that it plans to offer these services under a subscription of Rs 15,000 ($225). But as another introductory offer, Jio users will get these services for free until the end of next year.
  
  Doesn't sound like free lunch.
Misleading Headline (as usual) by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 04:09 · Score: 0

Me after reading the headline: "Oh, how nice that the richest man in India using his own money installed a 4G/LTE tower and is allowing the public free access to it. It's as if he is giving back to society."
Me after reading the summary: "Oh, a BUSINESS run by the richest man in India has set up a 4G/LTE network and as part of their PAID service, customers can make unlimited phone calls for no extra charge. This is a press release promoting their service."
Never reliance. by freedom_india · 2016-09-01 04:34 · Score: 1

Worst customer service. The Comcast of india. Hard to activate. Harder to cancel.

--
"Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
1. Re:Never reliance. by golden_hands · 2016-09-01 07:58 · Score: 1
  
  Worst customer service. The Comcast of india. Hard to activate. Harder to cancel.
  This... I would rather pay more for every call than take a connection from Reliance. They are always keen to take your money, but the moment a problem crops up( as it inevitably does) you are left to swim on your own. Anil or Mukesh Ambani- which ever brother it is from, unless you have a lot of time and a lot of patience its better to avoid Reliance.
Re:Great just what we need by Compumyst · 2016-09-01 04:58 · Score: 1

Okay, unlike T-Mobile and now Sprint's very fluid (and wrong) usage of "unlimited data" (classifying video as something other than data is incorrect), saying "unlimited free calls" doesn't specify the geographical boundaries, so "national" calling can easily be assumed.

--
What's done's in the past, forever shall last.
Work is work; life is life; fair is not!
Not bad by OneHundredAndTen · 2016-09-01 06:10 · Score: 1

Although it might have been more useful for him to invest that money to provide toilets for the more than 600 million Indian citizens who lack them. Well, at the very least they will be able to use their phones while taking a shit in some public lot.
Damn by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 06:48 · Score: 0

And here I am in Canada, overpaying for anything related to communications.
India's richest man by Anonymous Coward · 2016-09-01 07:30 · Score: 0

Soon we will be outsourcing rich people too. If we got Indian richest people they would be a lot cheaper and we can save money over time. Will have to get Bill Gates, Larry Ellison, and Trump to train them for the 30 day transition period.
Re: Great just what we need by hackwrench · 2016-09-01 07:44 · Score: 1

No matter how you look at it the parent post was poorly written and led with international calls, so that had me confused
Here Please ! by JimSadler · 2016-09-01 10:30 · Score: 1

Come to the US. It might be a great option here.
Govt must nationalize Reliance Industries; by NewYork · 2016-09-02 06:20 · Score: 1

Ambani owes 100,000 crores to Banks;
Govt must nationalize Reliance Industries;
https://www.change.org/p/india...

--
Casteism