Slashdot Mirror


Clinton's First Email Server Was a Power Mac Tower (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader shares with us an excerpt from a report via Ars Technica: As she was being confirmed as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton contacted Colin Powell to ask him about his use of a Blackberry while in the same role. According to a Federal Bureau of Investigations memorandum published today (PDF), Powell warned Clinton that if it became public that she was using a Blackberry to "do business," her e-mails would be treated as "official" record and be subject to the law. "Be very careful," Powell said according to the FBI. "I got around it all by not saying much and not using systems that captured the data." Perhaps Clinton's troubles began when she switched from a Blackberry-hosted e-mail account to an account on her Clintonemail.com domain -- a domain hosted on an Apple Power Mac "G4 or G5" tower running in the Clintons' Chappaqua, New York residence. The switch to the Power Mac as a server occurred the same month she exchanged messages with Powell. The Power Mac, originally purchased in 2007 by former President Clinton's aide Justin Cooper, had acted as the server for presidentclinton.com and wjcoffice.com. Cooper managed most of the technology support for Bill Clinton and took charge of setting up Hillary Clinton's new personal mail system on the Power Mac, which sat alongside a firewall and network switching hardware in the basement of the Clintons' home. But the Power Mac was having difficulty handling the additional load created by Blackberry usage from Secretary Clinton and her staff, so a decision was made quickly to upgrade the server hardware. Secretary Clinton's deputy chief of staff at the State Department, Huma Abedin, connected Cooper with Brian Pagliano, who had worked in IT for the secretary's 2008 presidential campaign. Cooper inquired with Pagliano about getting some of the campaign's computer hardware as a replacement for the Power Mac, and Pagliano was in the process of selling the equipment off.

10 of 223 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Clinton should be in jail!!! by chill · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because at the time she did this is was against State Department internal regulations, but not a criminal offense.

    You only put people in jail for criminal offenses that have jail as punishment codified in the law, and even then jail is usually only one of many options available as punishment.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  2. Re:But the Power Mac was having difficulty handlin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bill was also using it to watch...videos.

  3. Re: Clinton should be in jail!!! by x0ra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's not the point, any conviction would prevent her accession to the US Throne. US AG Loretta Lynch (and upper in the hierarchy) can't allow that, who knows how much "corruption" stories she could remember while in jail...

  4. Re:But the Power Mac was having difficulty handlin by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Difficulty handling the relentless brute force attempts more likely.

  5. Re: Clinton should be in jail!!! by wasted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In short, she had no real first-hand knowledge of the server setup other than it was in her basement and handled her e-mail. The rest is typical VIP know nothing blather.

    The scary part is that she didn't seem to understand the differences between handling classified data and unclassified data. Almost anyone else in government who mishandled classified data similarly would be a guest of a federal correctional facility for many years.

  6. Re: Clinton should be in jail!!! by chill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The whole "I don't remember getting a briefing" is such colossal bullshit. Those briefings are required by law *annually*, not just once. And she would have gotten a separate briefing when she got her clearance, and any time it was upgraded.

    She understands the difference. She thinks she is above all that. Rules, like taxes, are for little people.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  7. Re:Clinton should be in jail!!! by quantaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because at the time she did this is was against State Department internal regulations, but not a criminal offense.

    You only put people in jail for criminal offenses that have jail as punishment codified in the law, and even then jail is usually only one of many options available as punishment.

    Unless you really don't like somebody.

    Then even the smallest transgression is apparently worthy of jail time.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  8. Re:But the Power Mac was having difficulty handlin by ls671 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    hmmm.... I have been running my own properly configured home based mail server for years and the load is negligible....

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  9. Re:It was unequivocally a criminal offense by hsthompson69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Intent is not necessary to violate 18 U.S. Code 793

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/us...

    (f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
    Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

    tl;dr - she didn't have to know it was wrong, she simply had to be "extremely careless" (aka, "grossly negligent")

  10. Re:Server software? by guruevi · · Score: 5, Informative

    OS X has had a Server "version" since the era described (10.3 or 10.4). So most likely cyrus/postfix.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com