Canadian Telecoms Will Try to Justify Their 'Ripoff' TV Plans Today (vice.com)
Starting today, Canada's top telecom companies will have to answer to the government for "skinny" TV packages -- more popularly known as "ripoff" by Canadians. Motherboard reports: In 2015, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) ruled that companies must offer a $25 "skinny" cable package, partly to benefit people earning a lower income. However, additional fees and installation charges added up so that the packages often cost a lot more than that -- in some cases, up to $100 per month. In response, Canadians called bullshit and complained to the CRTC en masse. Over two days of hearings beginning on Wednesday, Canada's top cable providers will have to prove that their skinny plans are in compliance with the CRTC's standards and that their packages meet the "spirit" of the skinny initiative. These hearings are part of the regulator's annual broadcasting license renewal process, meaning that if the companies aren't compliant, they could theoretically lose their license to operate in Canada.
Well, if it wasn't so cold. :) But seriously, how do we get something like this down in the US? Can we also get this for the Internet providers too?
But how? Canada is a socialist utopia?
$0
Cord cut years ago and it's so much better to live in a world where commercials are a novel occurrence (like watching TV in bars/family homes).
I spend much of the difference on media (Bluray, yes I still buy dead-dinosaur-discs) and streaming services.
Bye!
> These hearings are part of the regulator's annual broadcasting license
> renewal process, meaning that if the companies aren't compliant,
> they could theoretically lose their license to operate in Canada.
Just like Hillary Clinton could "theoretically" go to jail for running her own email server for government business. Don't worry about the fat cats. They just need to shoot a round of golf with the CRTC commissioners, and nothing will happen.
I'm not repeating myself
I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
At least ban ads for the poor sods with cable. You don't pay for something with ads in.
Canadian Government imposes a price ceiling on a market, then proceeds to run around like a chicken with its head cut off wondering why the markets managed to react the way they did.
Price ceilings and price floors have predictable consequences, and for some reason we keep ignoring them.
It's also a great way to reduce competition, a direct result of left-shifting the supply curve of the supply/demand plot.
Wonder what the public key field is for?
And which cable company is it that you work for? You work someplace with office cuties!? Those are banned at my workplace.
Only I can judge you.
All the poor American's who will rush to Canada after Trump wins will need to be able to afford TV to watch the Daily Show.
If the CRTC didn't see that their "flexible" rules weren't going to be abused to the limit they are either idiots or complicit. To show their metal they should now say the skinny package should provide good value and be no more than $20 per month everything included including local taxes. With a total charge not to exceed $240 in the first year. Plus no contractual lock in.
Then when the telcos catch their breath the CRTC could then tell them that this will be reviewed every 6 months and if the general consumer sentiment is negative then the offending telcos will be broken up.
"But we reeeeeeeaaaaaaallllllly like money, and it's so much sweeter when we've hornswoggled it from people who can barely afford it."
Who did what now?
The resume is totally inaccurate. As Canadians, we are incapable of calling "bullshit", that's way too impolite. What we said when we saw the packages was "Oh!" Yeah, I know, pretty strong word, eh. Shook the telecoms to their core.
With the exception of GOT, I haven't heard anyone at work or socially with friends talk about TV shows in a decade.
love is just extroverted narcissism