Slashdot Mirror


The USB Kill Stick, Priced at $56, Is Designed To Destroy Laptops, PCs, TVs (zdnet.com)

There's a new USB Kill device in the market today which can destroy any device it touches. ZDNet reports: For just a few bucks, you can pick up a USB stick that destroys almost anything that it's plugged into. Laptops, PCs, televisions, photo booths -- you name it. Once a proof-of-concept, the pocket-sized USB stick now fits in any security tester's repertoire of tools and hacks, says the Hong Kong-based company that developed it. It works like this: when the USB Kill stick is plugged in, it rapidly charges its capacitors from the USB power supply, and then discharges -- all in a matter of seconds. On unprotected equipment, the device's makers say it will "instantly and permanently disable unprotected hardware." You might be forgiven for thinking, "Well, why exactly?" The lesson here is simple enough. If a device has an exposed USB port -- such as a copy machine or even an airline entertainment system -- it can be used and abused, not just by a hacker or malicious actor, but also electrical attacks.

13 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. So? by Hizonner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whoopee. I can hit it with a hammer for free, or plug it into the power line for a couple of bucks.

    1. Re:So? by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Argh, I was going to sell them my hammer for $55! Stop undercutting my price!

    2. Re:So? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you put a hammer inside a box marked "Newegg" and send it to someone, upon opening the box he will most like *not* use it to destroy his computer.

      But if you do the same thing with a USB stick zapper, there's a pretty good chance that he will stick it in his computer and end up with a fried computer.

    3. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It would be a terrible shame if law enforcement personnel were to illegally confiscate and subsequently attempt to read the contents of USB devices which immediately destroyed whatever they were plugged into. It really would be a shame. -PCP

    4. Re:So? by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Picture what would happen if on Election Day someone were to plug one of these into an electronic voting machine on which the election officials had accidentally left the USB port exposed. Fry the machine, quickly pocket the stick, call election officials over (or just walk away) and you've slowed voting at that polling place by reducing the number of machines, potentially forcing them to switch to paper ballots. Election officials might question why you're carrying a hammer with you into the voting booth; they're unlikely to ask you to turn out your pockets so they can inspect any USB drives you may be carrying, and a USB drive is easier to hide than a hammer.

    5. Re:So? by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Ethernet Killer is probably worth mentioning, too.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:So? by WolfgangVL · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Wait, full stop. Your saying when my shit is confiscated and used against my wishes in an un-intended application by an uninformed outside operator (read: not me) I am somehow liable when this not me person uses it wrong and asses up his own gear? What about my right to remain silent? What if its labeled PERSONAL?

      What if I straight up TELL the border control agent -
      "This thumbdrive is dangerous and will kill his computer, do not attempt to view the contents?"

      This is a real honest question. No snark.

      I love the idea of a nasty little red herring hiding in my personal private papers and effects.

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  2. As the saying goes... by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you have physical access to the device, you can beat the fucking shit out of it with a rock.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. Re:Is it evil if... by PRMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Label it "Porn Collection" and leave it on the ground in the parking lot...

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  4. Less malign devices by phorm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder what other fun things you could do with a USB-charged capacitor, preferable things that don't cause actual damage.
    How about a tiny speaker that plays in a loop
      "This idiot just plugged in a hacked USB device!"

  5. Re:Fairy dust and unicorn dreams. by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Didn't see the You-tube video of the concept version of this being demoed on a laptop did you? Fried the screen and board in the first pulse and took out the power system and everything else with the second (each pulse takes about a second to charge and release). These things are not pushing a 10V signal on a 5V line, they are pumping a 230V charge into the port with magnitudes more amperage than static electricity, the simple over-voltage protections on current USB ports can't protect against this.

    A real solution to a device like this will require a far more robust design on the over-volt protection on the ports. Something that can resist 200V+.

  6. This is why we can't have nice things. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because there is always some asshole who feels the need to break stuff.
    These public USB Power ports were set up as a convenience for the public and the customers, so that Doctor can have his phone charged so he doesn't miss that life saving call. They are giving us free energy to power our mobile devices. The TVs to entertain us, while we are stuck waiting. But no there has to be some jerk who needs to find a way to break it. We can't have an infrastructure for new technology now, just because it can be broke.

    Now this device is just for bad people to do bad things, there is no good in it. It isn't even good enough for properly destroying technology as for the most part it will probably just damage the USB interface card and not reliably break the rest of the system.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  7. Re:Ugh, Sometimes I hate people by harrkev · · Score: 5, Informative

    As an EE, I have some experience with this. I really do digital logic chip design, and leave the design of the IO pins to the analog guys (and I am NOT an analog guy)...

    However, pins are designed to dissipate excess charge using the "human body model." The specification is charging a small capacitor to a few thousand volts and dissipating that into a pin. Since the capacitance is small, the total amperage is very small. There are zener diodes built into IO pads that can handle this small amount of current. An ESD event will only last for the barest fraction of a second. Now, if you actually intentionally put too much voltage across pins for a prolonged period of time, I can easily imagine those zener diodes dying. Once that happens, the voltage will start to play merry hell with the logic.

    I also did some government (military) work a decade ago. With those systems, you generally hardened them against EMP pulses (don't want a nuke taking down your electronics), so we used something called "transorbs.". Basically, these are big, beefy external zener diodes that can clamp this type of event. HOWEVER, from what I recall, those diodes put too much capacitance on the line, which would do very bad things to high-speed data lines, such as the ones found in USB data lines. Transorbs are great for things like low-speed serial port lines (which explains standards like MIL-STD-1553. I do not know if transorbs have improved much (not done that sort of thing for 10 years), but these are the types of problems you have to face when dealing with something like this -- the devices needed to protect your USB ports might just make your USB ports unusable.

    --
    "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."