Slashdot Mirror


YouTube Gets Its Own Social Network With Launch of YouTube Community (techcrunch.com)

The earlier reports were right when they said YouTube was working on launching its own social networking service for content creators. Instead of the "YouTube Backstage" branding, YouTube has decided to call their social networking service "YouTube Community," which allows content creators to use text, GIFs, and images to better engage viewers. Given the controversy surrounding YouTube in regard to demonetizing videos that are not deemed "friendly to advertisers," many YouTube creators have been or are thinking about leaving the site and joining competing services. These new tools are designed to help keep creators from departing to competing platforms. TechCrunch reports: YouTube has been testing the new service over the past several months with a handful of creators in order to gain feedback. It's launching the service into public beta with this group of early testers, and will make it available to a wider group of creators in the "month's ahead," it says. Access to this expanded feature set is made available to the creators and their viewers by way of a new "Community" tab on their channels. From here, creators can share things like text posts, images, GIFs and other content, which the audience can thumbs up and down, like the videos themselves, as well as comment on. Viewers will see these posts in their "Subscriptions" feed in the YouTube mobile application, and can also choose to receive push notifications on these posts from their favorite creators, YouTube says." Only time will tell whether or not this new move will be better received than YouTube's Google+ integration...

18 of 73 comments (clear)

  1. Yes, because YouTube comments make great dialogue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    NOT.

  2. If Google+ failed, lets try with another name! by JcMorin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Google will try again the same thing with a different name.

    1. Re:If Google+ failed, lets try with another name! by unixisc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's what I was wondering. To change how my icon looked in YouTube, I had to go into Google+ and edit it. So now, would those capabilities by in the new YouTube community? And would YouTube community automatically take out all Google+ members whose sole reason for getting in was via YouTube?

    2. Re:If Google+ failed, lets try with another name! by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Recalls the last efforts with the "Google Plus Finally Gives Up on Its Ineffective, Dangerous Real-Name Policy" (July 17 2014)
      http://www.slate.com/blogs/fut...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  3. Whats missing by johnsnails · · Score: 2

    Can they fix the current comment section on desktop, you cannot read the comments and watch the video like you can on mobile.

  4. Oh, this should be good by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    Have you ever seen the "community" over at YouTube?

    https://youtu.be/n8M6m5UiDaI

    Enjoy the comments over there, but don't blame me if you end up drinking rat poison.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Oh, this should be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The most widely viewed YouTube videos do tend to end up with pretty terrible comments, but there are quite a few smaller, more niche channels have some of the nicest commenters I've encountered anywhere on the internet.

  5. Competing Service? by muphin · · Score: 2

    "many YouTube creators have been or are thinking about leaving the site and joining competing services" ...
    whos a competitor to YouTube? vimeo has limite video plays ...

    http://www.dailydot.com/upstre... ??

    --
    It's not a typo if you understood the meaning!
  6. Is that what these annoying fucking alerts are? by TWX · · Score: 2

    YouTube Gets Its Own Social Network With Launch of YouTube Community

    Is that what these goddamn alerts on my cell phone are? Jeeezus.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  7. Dear Screwtape by sinij · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dear Screwtape,

    Today I expanded YouTube comments section to social network. Tomorrow I will make it mandatory to use to access any other Google service. This is all as planned, and I will finally succeed into turning Internet into private hell that is Youtube comments section.

    Sincerely yours,
    Wormwood

  8. ... and chicks for free. by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, growing up in the 80s sort of drilled that song into my subconscious...

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:... and chicks for free. by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      No, no chicks, that's against the policy now.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Let's just get ahead of the curve here: by rainwalker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We have just announced on the Official Google Blog that we will soon retire YOUTUBE COMMUNITY. We know YOUTUBE COMMUNITY has a devoted following who will be very sad to see it go. We're sad too.

    There are two simple reasons for this: usage of YOUTUBE COMMUNITY has declined, and as a company we're pouring all of our energy into fewer products. We think that kind of focus will make for a better user experience.

    Thank you again for using YOUTUBE COMMUNITY as your COMMUNITY platform.

  10. Didn't we already do this? by bigdavex · · Score: 2

    Google + ?

    --
    -Dave
  11. Ok... by boarder8925 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And nothing of value was gained.

  12. Re:Money for nothing by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Demonetise your videos, tough, suck it up and get a real miserable job like the majority. From a non-you tuber context, I guess that means if you see an ad before the video than that you tuber is an advertiser friendly arse hole very likely to lie to you, to sell what ever it is they are being paid to sell you. No ad and probably they are, well, not advertiser friendly and likely to be genuine in their videos.

    This as a broad policy driven by nothing but the Big Shit from Alphabet and pure cynical greed. If Advertisers do not want their commercials to be shown with videos make the fuckers look at them and decide one by one, which videos their ads will be shown with and which will be ignored, rather the secret back room pay to play, revenue censorship.

    How about the end user the viewer having a choice. How about being able to block uploaders on you tube when you log in. Peoples who videos you never want to see because they are crap with scammy headlines and lead in images, apparently that crap is advertiser friendly because you get to show more ads. How about counting videos as being seen, only of the majority of the video was viewed and not just the first few seconds to realise the video was crap and drop out.

    Evil is as evil does and Google has become a pit of lies.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  13. Nope by XSportSeeker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Given the controversy surrounding YouTube in regard to demonetizing videos that are not deemed "friendly to advertisers," many YouTube creators have been or are thinking about leaving the site and joining competing services. These new tools are designed to help keep creators from departing to competing platforms"

    Huh? No they are not. This has been in development for a long time, way before the demonetization "scandal" happened.
    And somehow, I don't think YouTube is too worried about creators departing to competing platforms. They did way worse before, and no one left.
    What happens again and again is the drama, bunch of people complaining about it, threatening to leave, usually not fully understanding what they are talking about, then they all realize that YouTube is the only service with such a huge audience, and then they just give up.

    Which I know is bad in itself, but the top statement sounds a bit like guesswork. Did you just try to bungle together two separate things there?

    YouTube Community is here because quite frankly, the current commenting system is outdated, a mess and cumbersome. Not because Google+, not because YouTube commenters are the worst, but because the system itself is horrible. You can't find anything in it, browsing through it can sometimes be impossible, the webapp is often not synced with the mobile app, you can't do much of anything other than scroll and reply to people, it's probably among the most primitive commenting systems out there. Commenters can't even see a history of their own comments. There's zero customization.

    But this has been an issue and a constant complain for quite a while now, so I guess YouTube is finally doing something about it... no clue if it'll be worth anything though.

  14. Re:Money for nothing by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ME deciding what I want to see is fine.
    YOU deciding what I am allowed to see it not.

    Do you finally get the difference?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.