Slashdot Mirror


Guccifer 2.0 Releases More DNC Documents (politico.com)

For the past several months, the hacker who calls himself "Guccifer 2.0" has been releasing documents about the Democratic National Committee. Today, he has released a new hoard of documents. Politico reports: The hacker persona Guccifer 2.0 has released a new trove of documents that allegedly reveal more information about the Democratic National Committee's finances and personal information on Democratic donors, as well as details about the DNC's network infrastructure. The cache also includes purported memos on tech initiatives from Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Kaine's time as governor of Virginia, and some years-old missives on redistricting efforts and DNC donor outreach strategy. Most notable among Tuesday's documents may be the detailed spreadsheets allegedly about DNC fundraising efforts, including lists of DNC donors with names, addresses, emails, phone numbers and other sensitive details. Tuesday's documents regarding the DNC's information technology setup include several reports from 2010 purporting to show that the committee's network passed multiple security scans. In total, the latest dump contains more than 600 megabytes of documents. It is the first Guccifer 2.0 release to not come from the hacker's WordPress account. Instead, it was given out via a link to the small group of security experts attending [a London cybersecurity conference].

35 of 333 comments (clear)

  1. Summary missing important piece... by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    What about the large number of donors who, immediately after their hefty donations, received cushy ambassadorships?

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    1. Re:Summary missing important piece... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      We have moved on from this now. The real question on everyone's minds is

      What about the large number of donors who, immediately after their hefty donations, received pneumonia?

    2. Re:Summary missing important piece... by Iconoc · · Score: 5, Informative
    3. Re:Summary missing important piece... by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 5, Funny

      Naah, that's overblown. She was just having a routine problem with her human suit. Happens all the time. Those things don't last forever, you know. Gotta be replaced every now and then. The real trick is getting the aging correct since you can't just show up looking like you're 20 again. Humans tend to get suspicious when that happens.

      It's actually a rather complicated procedure because of how tightly integrated human suits are with lizard person physiology, so that's why she needed so much time off in August. "Skinning" can actually be a form of torture and can be fatal without the proper medical attention.

      It should be smooth sailing now!

    4. Re:Summary missing important piece... by the_saint1138 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Details on cushy ambassadorships via Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/The_D...

    5. Re:Summary missing important piece... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You gotta remember, liberals love to justify bad behavior, by pointing to (often unrelated) ... bad behavior.

      It is as if they are four year olds getting in trouble, and saying "but Billy's Mom lets him drink beer/smoke dope". The problem is, nobody calls it "childish" behavior (which it is), because that is insulting to children.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    6. Re:Summary missing important piece... by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bush is a low bar to judge yourself against.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:Summary missing important piece... by pushing-robot · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ambassadorships to friendly countries, the UK in particular, have always been given as rewards to political friends. You could count the number of people who became UK ambassador on merit on one hand which had been run through a wood chipper.

      The reason you didn't know about this before is because it never became an issue. Tuttle made a bit of a kerfuffle a decade ago, but it takes a lot to start a diplomatic incident with a close ally and being ambassador to the UK or France or Australia really requires no great skill as a peacemaker. If you were being particularly charitable, you could even say that fundraisers and diplomats have a lot in common.

      Everyone has plenty of dirty laundry, including you and me. 'Innocent until proven guilty' is an excellent attitude in criminal court, but the attitude 'innocent until doxxed' skews our perceptions and gives power to doxxers. Honestly I'm a bit surprised these leaks haven't found more than 'omg, politics at political party!'

      Remember, parties are not obligated to be democratic or unbiased. Legally and constitutionally there's only one vote, the general election in November. Anyone* can be nominated as a candidate for that election, and if both parties decided to nominate whomever they pleased they might be breaking their own rules but not the law. Everything up to and including the conventions is just meant to give supporters a feel of involvement and to remove unpopular candidates without invoking the wrath of their supporters. But the parties want to win, and if one candidate seems more 'electable' you can bet the party will give then a leg up on the rest.

      * you know what I mean

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    8. Re:Summary missing important piece... by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you start asking people, "which businessperson do you think would make a good president?" they will start listing celebrity CEOs (woohoo! Steve Jobs for president! Nevermind that his temperment is totally unsuited for it).

      Pretty sure he's calmed down a little since he died... and maybe a corpse would be an improvement over the current top two candidates?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    9. Re:Summary missing important piece... by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So it's okay to give money to a private political organization in order to get favors from the government?

      Why don't we just auction off ambassadorships then?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    10. Re:Summary missing important piece... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What about the large number of donors who, immediately after their hefty donations, received cushy ambassadorships?

      Where have you been? It's worked that way, with both parties, since forever.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    11. Re:Summary missing important piece... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which party are you complaining about? Because from where I sit, both the D and R parties are ... guilty of that charge.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    12. Re:Summary missing important piece... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Informative

      You mean, like when Bill Clinton said "Make America Great" is racist, even though he used that same exact phrase a number of times during his own presidential campaign?

      That, is hypocrisy, because it is actually word for word comparison. Rather than when talking about email servers and health of a presidential candidate, try to change the subject by calling Trump a racist for saying "Make America Great". (actual example)

      No, I am not supporting Trump either. Vote Gary Johnson.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    13. Re:Summary missing important piece... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Interesting

      RIght, when a (D) says something like "Make America Great Again" (Bill Clinton, running for President) it isn't racist, because Bill isn't a racist. But when an (R) (Trump running in 2016) says something like "Make America Great Again" it is racist, because Bill says in the south, that phrase has a particular connotation. Trump being from New York State, would know that, and that is why he is a racist, but Bill 24 years ago (from Arkansas) wouldn't have known.

      Context like that?

      Or you just making excuses because ... well you like (D) and not (R) politics, and will use the "Racism" card even in situations where it wouldn't fit, and if it did fit, wouldn't go in the direction you'd like?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    14. Re:Summary missing important piece... by pushing-robot · · Score: 3, Funny

      So it's okay to give money to a private political organization in order to get favors from the government?

      Well, in the sense that it's not illegal, has been going on for 200+ years and the country has survived, it's 'okay'.

      If Hillary was really a modern William Tweed there would be a lot more interesting stuff in those email dumps.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    15. Re:Summary missing important piece... by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's been plenty of interesting stuff in previous releases of Hillary's particular emails. I would say the most amazing was acknowledgment that the reason we backed the moderate beheaders in Syria against Assad was so the Israelis would feel better about a nuclear Iran without a stable Syria as a base of operations for Hezbollah. The 400,000 war dead, the creation of ISIS, the blowback attacks in Paris, San Bernardino, Brussels, Nice, Orlando, and the refugee crisis that threatens to destabilize all of western Europe...no problem for Hillary and her supporters. It's unreal. But here we are.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    16. Re:Summary missing important piece... by Zak3056 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Remember, when someone like David Duke endorses Donald Trump and Trump says, "Who is David Duke, and why should I care?" this proves Trump is a racist. When Hillary Clinton talks about how Robert Byrd was her "friend and mentor" this also proves that Trump is a racist. See how easy that is?

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  2. The last set showed laws broken by DNC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The last set of documents showed that the DNC broke campaign finance laws and yet absolutely nothing was done about it.

    Since any damning evidence in documents from democrats will be ignored, why do they even try? It won't make any difference.

    Now, if a similar trove of documents from the RNC was dumped, you can bet the DOJ would be all over it. Under Obama's administration political considerations trump the law every time.

    1. Re:The last set showed laws broken by DNC by Jiro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...which leads one to ask why that isn't also happening?

      Trump is an outsider. He's a Republican, but not part of the Republican establishment. The RNC wasn't on his side until the absolute last minute when they had to accept him as a candidate. So there isn't going to be any dirt about things the RNC did behind the scenes to help Trump.

    2. Re:The last set showed laws broken by DNC by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Now, if a similar trove of documents from the RNC was dumped, you can bet the DOJ would be all over it.

      ...which leads one to ask why that isn't also happening?

      That's a question I've asked before but never gotten a good answer. But I think there are 4 possibilities (some more likely than others, but I don't have the knowledge to pick which is the current situation)

      1. The RNC can't be hacked
      2. The RNC can be hacked, and is clean.
      3. The people doing the hacking are anti-DNC/anti-Hillary and haven't even tried to hack the RNC
      4. The people doing the hacking are actually pro-Hillary (or at least anti-Trump) and have the goods on the RNC, but are waiting to dump them just before the election so that they remain fresh in voters minds, while the anti-DNC stuff is long forgotten.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:The last set showed laws broken by DNC by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...which leads one to ask why that isn't also happening?

      Same reason that the FBI refused to turn over all documents to an internal committee when Obama didn't declare executive privilege? The same reason why the IRS ran a campaign against tea party groups and people resigned over it, but no charges were laid? It's heavy with insiders, and there is likely dirt on them *not* to do anything against the DNC or Hillary.

      But as to why there hasn't been any leaks from the RNC? Combination of 3 things just my guess: Better security, last story I saw on the CBC said there'd been a dozen attempts all unsuccessful. Someone really has a hate-on for Hillary after the last batch showed the DNC throwing in for her against their own rules. The third is she's such an establishment candidate that is working against her own party and liberal-leaning ideas, that no fucks are given at all.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:The last set showed laws broken by DNC by TrancePhreak · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to Assange, supposedly they don't have anything surprising about Trump. Nothing that he hasn't already talked about or that has been brought up about him. So it sounds like there's lots of accusations without anything out there to back them up. The same thing happens with Clinton, but somehow we end up with the data to verify it.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
  3. Re:is this all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    COUGH...

    FTFY

  4. Re:Some hacker, he's not found anything real by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since when did Hillary supporters decide to bury their head in the sand over anything she does, while screaming the pepe the frog is a racist meme(never mind that they were masterfully trolled over it), and went so far as to write up hit pieces on it.

    From an outsiders perspective on Clinton, she's managed to pull both a "How do you do fellow kids" and "I'm batshit insane" all in one week.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  5. Re: Slashdot censoring anti-Trump news by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What are you talking about? Every media outlet except FOX is sucking at Hillary's big toes, and even at times FOX is sucking her toes and licking them. Whether it be in the US or Canada or the bloody UK. Hell NBC deleted a segment from a broadcast last night when Bill Clinton said Hillary "Frequently fainted" sorry I mean "occasionally fainted" that of course saved them all of 1.5 seconds from their 1hr broadcast time limit, which was their excuse. Nearly every site is sucking at her toes. Even on reddit from /r/politics to /r/news to /r/worldnews is deleting anti-Hillary stories, even when they use the exact title.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  6. Re:Wonder what the RNC is doing about now? by oic0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    BS. The majority of the media is left leaning. They would love to pan the RNC.

  7. Re:Wonder what the RNC is doing about now? by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Informative

    Shh. Don't tell the partisan hacks that. They'll get upset when you show that only 7% of the US media identifies as republican. And nearly 30% identify as democrats, which is less then 1992 when nearly 45% of the media self-identified as democrats. Or that democrats get more positive press. Or that90% of reporters in the DC area AKA beltway reporters either are declared democrats or vote democrat.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  8. Re:Some hacker, he's not found anything real by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because "alt-right" is racist, because ... democrats say so?

    But Hillary's "Super Predators" and "Bring them to heel" comments aren't. Her (and her husband's) use of Confederate Flags wasn't racist. "Make America Great Again" is racist, except when Bill used it for his campaign.

    Here is the problem, as I see it. The most racist thing out there, is the whole DNC platform that expects black people to continue to vote DNC candidates, without so much as even pandering, simply by tossing out the race card over every little thing.

    It is obvious that crying Racism is the ONLY thing left the Democrats have with respect to Hillary's campaign. And that is, by itself racist. And the black community is starting to wake up to the pure racism of low expectations that the DNC has of them.

    Can't have voter ID laws, because the DNC says Black people can't figure out how to get a free voter ID. But that isn't racist.
    Can't have single day voting, because DNC says Black People can't figure out how to fill out an absentee ballot or get to the polls on time. But that isn't racist.

    IF you simply look at the excuses being made on behalf of black people, they are all telling black people that they are incapable of doing normal activities, simply because ... they are black.And I find that extremely distasteful and as fucking racist as anything.

    Black people aren't as stupid, lazy, incapable as the DNC is making them out to be. But I am a racist for pointing out how stupid the DNC position is for these people.

    NO - I am not voting for Trump, this isn't about Trump, this is about racist DNC positions on how they actually treat black people as a "group" of incapable lazy idiots, who need special treatment and help to do normal things.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  9. Re: Slashdot censoring anti-Trump news by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is like when the talking heads on one news program (CNN I believe) described New York City on Sunday as "Sweltering", when it was 78 Degrees out, in an attempt to make Hillary's lie about dehydration seem more legitimate. Obviously they are "pro-Trump".

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  10. Re:Wonder what the RNC is doing about now? by stinerman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Perhaps we need some sort of affirmative action program to ensure that conservative journalists aren't blackballed like that.

  11. Re:Some hacker, he's not found anything real by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can't have voter ID laws, because the DNC says Black people can't figure out how to get a free voter ID. But that isn't racist.

    Literally nobody has argued that in the history of Voter Suppression Laws. What has been argued is:

    1. Minority voters are disproportionately unlikely to have an existing photo ID (say, a driver's license.)
    2. Once enacted, states with Voter ID laws have a habit of erecting roadblocks to make it harder to get them if you live in areas with high minority populations. For example, closing offices that issue driver's licenses.
    3. If you've never had ID, it can be - depending on your situation - difficult to meet the criteria for obtaining ID, requiring the gathering of paperwork that most people don't actually keep, and in some cases is - in practice - impossible to obtain.

    There's also been at least one court case where a Voter ID law was thrown out specifically because the Republicans that created it fashioned it knowing that Voter ID laws would disproportionately impact legitimate Democratic voters. I actually heard a Republican pundit argue that they weren't being racist, because, uh, yeah blacks were disproportionately affected, but they overwhelmingly vote Democratic, and attempts to suppress their vote were based upon the fact they were Democrats, not because they were black as such.

    Yeah, right.

    IF you simply look at the excuses being made on behalf of black people, they are all telling black people that they are incapable of doing normal activities, simply because ... they are black.And I find that extremely distasteful and as fucking racist as anything.

    You're basically making stuff up in order to justify the "But Democrats are the TRUE racists" spin. Have you considered listening to what the big bad Democrats are saying, rather than inventing absurd caricatures? You'll look less ridiculous.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  12. Re:Some hacker, he's not found anything real by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have you considered listening to what the big bad Democrats are saying, rather than inventing absurd caricatures? You'll look less ridiculous.

    With Black Panthers, Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, Bill Ayers, Al Sharpton, etc. on the Democrat side it's trivial to find plenty of racist bullshit over there. They're as deplorable as David Duke, yet I don't see Hillary getting all upset about them supporting her.

  13. Re:Apologies [Re:Some hacker, he's not found by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hillary lies about what she said. Then she lies about telling lies. And then lies again.

    Or perhaps she forgets what she said, after all the brain trauma she's experienced (and used as an excuse for not remembering critical briefings).

    AND I guess you didn't see the part where I am not defending Trump. You're defending Hillary is amusing, when it is clear that she is every bit as bad as Trump is, and yet you think Trump is worse.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  14. Re:Some hacker, he's not found anything real by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Have you considered listening to what the big bad Democrats are saying,

    Yes, I have. They are liars and cheaters, and I don't believe anything they say, unless it is proven true. Same for Republicans.

    1. Minority voters are disproportionately unlikely to have an existing photo ID (say, a driver's license.)

    This is fucking racist. There is absolutely no evidence that this exists. And that is not the argument when "free government issued ID" is included in the Voter ID laws. There is NO ability loss just because skin color. The fact that you're making excuses as to why skin color actually matters in getting a photo ID (often Free, low cost), when so many other government services and purchasing things like alcohol, opening a bank account, getting welfare, having a job ... all requires a photo ID. You're basically saying that skin color matters in ABILITY (and without proof, I might add) .. which is patently racist at face value. You are so blinded you can't even see how your view of Race is remarkably ... sad.

    2. Once enacted, states with Voter ID laws have a habit of erecting roadblocks to make it harder to get them if you live in areas with high minority populations. For example, closing offices that issue driver's licenses.

    Strawman and slippery slope fallacy. And Racist. You're making the case that Government is racist (I wouldn't disagree), is an excuse to continue racism in other forms. And You have no facts to actually back up this claim, because there are no Voter ID laws that are actually valid, since "black people are not capable of getting IDs to vote" (See racist point #1)

    3. If you've never had ID, it can be - depending on your situation - difficult to meet the criteria for obtaining ID, requiring the gathering of paperwork that most people don't actually keep, and in some cases is - in practice - impossible to obtain.

    Bullshit. And fucking Racist. It is so easy to get Voter approved ID, that Illegal immigrants without any form of ID can get Driver's Licenses in many many states. You're saying that a Hispanic person ("undocumented worker") is more capable of getting ID than a black person, do you realize how fucking racist that is?

    The fact is, you're making excuses for people based solely upon the color of their skin, and don't even realize how fucking racist that actually comes across when someone actually questions your motivations. Yes, I believe you're unintentionally racist because you think your big heart excuses your racism, because of intentions. Real racism isn't intentional, it is white guilt masquerade of low expectations.

    You see, I see black people as FULLY capable of doing anything and everything a "white" person can and does do. Without exception or excuse as to why they don't. Yes, that puts me in a rare situation where I can see the Racism of white guilt throughout the DNC, that perpetuates the myth that black people need white people to help them, because they aren't white.

    They don't need our help, they are fully capable.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  15. Re:Some hacker, he's not found anything real by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. Minority voters are disproportionately unlikely to have an existing photo ID (say, a driver's license.)
    2. Once enacted, states with Voter ID laws have a habit of erecting roadblocks to make it harder to get them if you live in areas with high minority populations. For example, closing offices that issue driver's licenses.
    3. If you've never had ID, it can be - depending on your situation - difficult to meet the criteria for obtaining ID, requiring the gathering of paperwork that most people don't actually keep, and in some cases is - in practice - impossible to obtain.

    Really? Just going to say it, people who are against voter ID are insane, in the worst case I'd call you anti-democratic. Even us people in "liberal Canada" and those "ultra liberal" people in Norway, Germany and Denmark have mandatory requirements for voter ID. FYI, voter ID doesn't mean picture ID either. So stop pulling bullshit out of your ass. Seriously, get your fucking shit in order and stop blocking it. If you don't even have two items listed in the accepted section that we use in Canada, you don't fucking exist, and know zero people. Since you can file for an affirmation under oath from a friend. Voter ID isn't racist, it's fundamental to a secure democracy. Hell you can't get really can't government benefits of in the US without some form of ID.

    You're basically pro-voter fraud as long as you keep pushing this BS. There are multiple cases of it happening.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...