Pandora Has Announced Its $5 Subscription Service (recode.net)
Peter Kafka, writing for Recode: Earlier this week, Pandora signed two of the three big music labels to deals that will let it launch new streaming music services. Now it is launching one of them: Pandora Plus, an "ad-free radio experience with dramatically increased functionality," which will sell for $5 a month. Most Pandora users won't be able to listen to the service today: A Pandora rep says the service is going live to about 1 percent of its user base today and won't fully roll out to all of its users for another month or so. In the meantime, Pandora is still negotiating with Warner Music Group, the remaining big music label that hasn't signed a deal with the streaming service. Sources say the two sides have an agreement in principle, but were still papering the deal late last night -- apparently Pandora didn't want to wait before it announced the new service. Pandora also wants to launch a $10-a-month service, but that one may not launch for months. The new $5 service replaces Pandora's existing $5 ad-free service and has two new features: The ability to skip as many songs as you want and the option to download a limited number of songs for offline listening.
I am an avid (paid) user of Pandora, and I love the service, have been using it for ~15 years.
But this is too little, too late... I am the only one among my friends that use Pandora. Everyone else uses Youtube, Spotify, and even iHeartRadio... I don't see this gaining any user base for them, only keeping the user base that they currently have
So they've replaced Pandora One, a $5 service that eliminates adds and lets you skip songs, with Pandora Plus, a $5 service that eliminates adds and lets you skip songs?
I mostly listen to music for free too. I download 6 songs completely free from the Library each month using Freegal. I listen to Pandora (free). I sell my (inaccurately if they ask too personal questions) soul to Google to get the google rewards money for downloading music from google play.
All free. All legal.
On the flipside though Pastafarians will tell you that pirating will help reverse global warming, and that's a good thing.
"That's the way to do it" - Punch
I'm surprised so many people want to listen to playlists that somebody else made.
Pandora is full of these terrible "compilation" albums instead of the original releases. It's impossible to use it as a serious classical music listener. They don't provide adequate information about composers, performers, orchestras, etc. They treat something on the "Baby Mozart" CD the same as a serious recording. It's ridiculous. A very similar situation for original soundtracks, which I also enjoy. Very unhappy with Pandora overall. It's probably great for people who just want their top-40 hits of whichever decade within the last few decades, but for the rest of us, it's awful.
iHeartRadio.com
...they're growing 5% in listener hours year-to-year, and had 9.3+ BILLION (with a B) $USD in ad revenue, FY 2015. You can complain all you want about them, but they are a huge force in the advertising industry and for listeners alike.
Adding a pay service is going to be a revenue generator, but only a fraction of users will opt for it. Few people really care about a commercial every 15 minutes.
Yes, yes, it's very edgy and trendy to hate on the service, but facts are facts.
Pandora is not worth $0 while Jango still lives.
until they billed me for a year without my consent by changing my shit to auto-renewal without notice or asking (I was already getting tired of the small circle of songs on most of my stations anyway).
I canceled and never looked back. I don't stream shit now - fuck that - I'd rather have the files and the quality and control that go with them.
Can you still open their .xml and see the next umpteen songs you're gonna get whether you like or not? =)