Slashdot Mirror


House Committee: Edward Snowden's Leaks Did 'Tremendous Damage' (nbcnews.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from NBC News: The U.S. House intelligence committee on Thursday unanimously approved a blistering report on the activities of Edward Snowden, saying his disclosures of top-secret documents and programs did "tremendous damage" to national security. "The public narrative popularized by Snowden and his allies is rife with falsehoods, exaggerations, and crucial omissions," said the report by staff members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Contrary to Snowden's statements that he intended to reveal programs that intruded on the privacy of Americans, the House report concluded that the vast majority of the 1.5 million documents he stole "have nothing to do with programs impacting individual privacy interests. They instead pertain to military, defense, and intelligence programs of great interest to America's adversaries." The report said Snowden did not, as he claimed, try to express his concerns about potentially illegal intelligence gathering in a way that would qualify him as a whistleblower. The report was disputed by Snowden's ACLU-provided attorney. "This is a dishonest report that attempts to discredit a genuine American hero," said Wizner. "But after years of 'investigation,' the committee still can't point to any remotely credible evidence that Snowden's disclosures caused harm. The truth is that Edward Snowden and the journalists with whom he worked did the job that the House Intelligence Committee was supposed to do: bring meaningful oversight to the U.S. Intelligence community. They did so responsibly and carefully, and their efforts have led to historic reforms."

25 of 278 comments (clear)

  1. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anything that ass fucks the government is right as rain for me.

    the government doesn't hesitate to ass fuck you every chance it gets.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Try living somewhere with no government and report back to us. That is if you get out alive.

    2. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Try living somewhere free and tell me you want to go back to the "freedom" in the USA.

    3. Re:Good by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Try living somewhere with no government and report back to us. That is if you get out alive.

      So you think the only alternative to a government that tramples over the rights of the citizens is no government at all? Did it not even occur to you that it might be nice to have a law-abiding, privacy-respecting government?

      Just because "it could be worse" does not give the government permission to do whatever they want.

    4. Re:Good by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's the same false "choice" being suggested in Europe: we are offered a choice between *this* EU, with lack of democratic oversight, officials that are appointed rather than elected, and drunken would-be despots like Juncker in charge... or no EU, which means war (which was the thread made during several EU related referenda: vote against, and "the lights will go out")

      This is the same thing: suggesting that a government with sweeping powers to spy on and control its citizens is the only alternative to anarchy and chaos, and that Snowden's actions threatened the stability brought about by the Panopticon.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Good by umghhh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Two things.:
      Assuming that GP was born in US means that asking them to live because they think their gov is dishonest and not interested in their well being is at least as dishonest as the US gov is.
      The other thing is this. Complaining about own government does not mean that all government is bad and has to be abandoned. I do not read that in GP post either. So how the fuck did you arrive on that conclusion is beyond me. MOst of governments do evil things either because of incompetence or negligence or because of bd will. It seems to me that the amount of bad will in US gov. is quite overwhelming. More they say they support democracy, more I get afraid this shit will hurt me in some way.

  2. liars gonna lie by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    too bad those that we trusted to uphold the constitution failed us SO MISERABLY.

    even their lies are transparent and shameless.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:liars gonna lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Technically the NSA was not doing anything illegal with it's efforts to collect call meta data because they were not specifically barred from doing so. Even after Snowden released information on that program the only thing that changed was the government had to submit a request for a NSL or FISA warrant. And FISA warrants have been around ever since Jimmy Carter was President. And NSL's have existed long before that.

      The arguments always revolve around what the government COULD do with any information not that they HAVE DONE. And there is no verifiable proof that anyone's rights have been violated. So what if they had access to call meta-data? That data has been collected since the invention of the phone for billing purposes. Has anyone been able to prove that government access to that information has harmed anyone? If the government wants some real personal information all they have to do is access the IRS databases. They do not even need a warrant to access that information.

      If Snowden wants to release all the information he and his pet journalists should release it all. They are currently cherry picking and releasing only those documents that support their opinion of US security interests. The arrogance displayed by both Snowden and his merry band of minions is breath taking. They alone think they are qualified to vet all the information and understand the consequences of releasing the information. They are acting as international relations experts capable of unraveling all the complex security programs being conducted not only by the US but by every other country on the planet.

      Russia will be offering up Snowden in the not so distant future because they really want the US to reduce or remove the financial sanctions they are currently working under.

    2. Re:liars gonna lie by HBI · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, I think they are actually telling the truth when they say Snowden did them "tremendous damage". He gave away methodologies, which benefited us all, but caused harm to the intelligence gathering efforts they are making reference to.

      His attorney is taking quite the wrong tack here, and instead should have criticized the program rather than differed with their characterization. Everyone knows the characterization is quite true if you are fan of constant surveillance of the citizenry.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:liars gonna lie by thestuckmud · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Technically the NSA was not doing anything illegal with it's efforts to collect call meta data because they were not specifically barred from doing so.

      The problem here is that NSA is a foreign intelligence agency, specifically prohibited from domestic intelligence collecting. So, it actually takes a great deal of effort to justify wholesale collection of data on US citizens by the NSA. The way they did it was by redefining the meaning of "collected" so that it no longer refers to data acquired through surveillance. Only data viewed by an NSA analyst is consideder "collected" under this scheme. Brilliant!

      Of course, our foreign partners at GCHQ are said to have unfettered access to this trove of data, which remain conveniently uncollected until NSA sees it.

      To make matters worse, this Orwellian justification for extra-legal domestic surveillance was kept secret from both the public at large and most of Congress. And top intelligence officials (I'm thinking about DNI James Clapper) lied to Congress about it when asked.

      "Until they became conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious."

      -- George Orwell, 1984

    4. Re:liars gonna lie by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Technically the NSA was not doing anything illegal with it's efforts to collect call meta data because they were not specifically barred from doing so.

      You mean except by that pesky thing called the fourth amendment, where it says, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized," I assume.... That specifically bars them from doing so.

      The term "papers" as used in the fourth amendment referred to all forms of non-face-to-face communication. At the time the Constitution was authored, the current state of technology limited the forms of such communication to printed matter, such as pamphlets and snail mail (as affirmed in Ex Parte Jackson, 1876).

      These days, private long-distance communication can also take the form of phone calls, Internet communication, and so on. These new forms of "papers" are fundamentally the same sort of construct as personal papers and letters—the very things that the fourth amendment was explicitly designed to protect. As such, there is absolutely no plausible legal reasoning by which one could rationally argue that these newer forms of papers should be treated differently from the forms that existed when the Constitution was created, for precisely the same reason that your Internet communication and phone calls are protected under freedom of speech laws even though they are being carried over wires as a series of ones and zeroes—something that the Founding Fathers would never have understood as being speech at the time.

      Therefore, it should be clear to any reasonable person that third-party doctrine is fundamentally flawed reasoning. Any argument to the contrary must involve some plausible reason why the law should treat a company's personal papers (telephone logs) differently than your own.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  3. Edward Snowden Leaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Provided a vital service to all people of the world and deserves a presidential pardon, post haste.

    The US government is the villain and Snowden is the hero. Nothing but a full presidential pardon will be acceptable. Heck, I'll sleep on my couch and he can move into my bedroom, for free.

  4. Re:The other side of the coin by shanen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Naw, that's just ridiculous. Snowden is not stupid and he did not keep the stuff with him. Nor can he possibly recall everything he saw, though he would make up some great stuff with a bit of torture.

    Putin likes Snowden on the loose because that embarrasses the heck out of America. (Well, more like a leash than the loose.) His intelligence value is negligible, but the political embarrassment is priceless.

    If Snowden became a nuisance to Putin, then he would be disposed of instantly, and without any regard to possible gratitude for any information he had brought with him. You can bet Snowden is smart enough to know that and is not going to do anything to piss off Putin. He may still get thrown back to the States if Putin decides it is politically expedient.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  5. They are right by Archfeld · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Snowden did do our government a disservice when he posted those documents online. What the report didn't state was that our government did the US people a HUGE disservice when they acted as they did to force his hand. Torture of POW's ? The violation of US laws to support US interests. The means does not justify the end and just because they chose to take the acts out of the US doesn't absolve them of the guilt.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  6. [citation needed] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll save you the time - the article is devoid of any reference to what "tremendous damage" was done.

  7. No it didn't by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bullfucking shit. Snowden's leaks did no such thing. It was you god damn bastards illegally spying on American citizens and foreign citizens that did the damage. If I had my way I would fly Snowden back here and pin a medal on his ass.

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  8. Whistleblowers Happen When the Gov Violates Law by silvergeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the NSA does not want the hassle of whistleblowers, then it should simply follow the law.

  9. Who to? by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Contractors reputations as they design, build and service vast illegal domestic spying systems?
    The well educated staff at US computer brands that allowed the US gov and mil to get plain text from their best encryption efforts globally? PRISM
    The top academics that hid the junk quality encryption systems and educated generations into thinking decades of US junk standards was best practice?
    The political leadership that never kept up with the findings of the Church Committee https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... on the domestic actions of the NSA, GCHQ and CIA?
    The fourth estate, the media, the press, the profession mentioned in the US Constitution that could not like reporting on junk encryption, total domestic collection?
    Lawyers who never bothered to uncover the true origins of their cases based on illegal domestic spying and parallel construction over the decades?
    The US hardware manufactures than shipped junk hardware with weak encryption over generations of product lines?
    The weaknesses in wifi that allow OVERHEAD to capture all and exposed all wifi users to more poor quality networking standards?
    Not seeing a lot of harm, just generations of people who designed and shipped junk globally or never bothered to publish any findings or solutions.
    Decades of junk hardware and software has now left networks around the world wide open.
    The damage was in the practice of collect it all. Now academics, the private sector and smarter staff working for real brands can start fixing decades of plain text access to networks than anyone could enjoy thanks to decades of policy and global exports.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  10. 1.5 million documents? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...the House report concluded that the vast majority of the 1.5 million documents he stole "have nothing to do with programs impacting individual privacy interests. They instead pertain to military, defense, and intelligence programs of great interest to America's adversaries."

    Since when did they know what Snowden copied? The NSA publicly stated they don't know what he got and had no way of knowing. Their systems were wide open to administrators, and they said as much. So... were they lying then or are they lying now?

    Considering who was speaking then and now, I say they're lying now. They don't know what or how much he got. They're just making shit up. The 1.5 million is at best a probability, but is most likely a wild-ass guess. Anybody who has worked in any human enterprise for a few years knows that the whole system runs on WAGs, and where engineers and mathematicians refuse to guess, outright lies. There is a lot less certainty in the world than anyone in power wants to admit.

    And this report? Pure gamemanship, waiting in the wings for precisely this moment when Congress knew that the ACLU would be pushing for a pardon. Now the talking heads have something to babble about, to drown out the ACLU. There doesn't have to be a true word in it for it to serve its purpose. House Intelligence Committee? There isn't a true word in it. Even the bylines are lies. It was written by spooks for spooks, not by Congress or congressional aids.

  11. Re:The other side of the coin by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think there is a very high likelihood that Snowden just leaked everything he stole (i.e. Russia doesn't have access to anything from Snowden that isn't already public). Why would Russia help Snowden? Let's look at some pros and cons for Russia helping Snowden even if they didn't get any additional information.

    Pros:
    Russia can troll the USA by...
    1. claiming to be more transparent and free than the USA
    2. by obstructing our justice system.
    3. by giving a platform to a famous person critical of the USA.
    4. Russia can make our intelligence agencies unsure of what if any additional information (even if it's nothing).
    5. Russia can have a bargaining chip with the USA if they ever want something from us.
    Just to name a few things I just thought of.

    Cons:
    1. Russia needs to pay for Snowden's food and lodging.

  12. Re:Former CIA Officer: President Obama Should Pard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He did give it to the enemy, as you stated:
    For this service, the government has charged Snowden under the World War I-era Espionage Act [freedom.press]. Yet Snowden did not sell information secretly to any enemy of America. Instead, he shared it openly through the press with the American people.

    If you haven’t already noticed, the American people are the enemy

  13. Be careful of handwaving arguments by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    one way or the other. Claiming their was "tremendous damage" doesn't mean there was any, or that it was indeed "tremendous". It just means you slapped an adjective onto your claim. By the same token calling someone a "hero" doesn't change anything about his actions; nor does calling him a "traitor". You shouldn't get a different set of rules based on whether your nametag has a smiley face on it or a frowny face.

    Be especially wary of statements like this:

    The Committee found no evidence that Snowden took any official effort to express concerns about U.S. intelligence activities — legal, moral, or otherwise — to any oversight officials within the U.S. government, despite numerous avenues for him to do so.

    It sounds damning, but it really depends among other things on where those "official" channels lead to. If they lead to the people who are responsible for the situation he was blowing the whistle on, it's a meaningless condemnation.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  14. Re:O no by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They claim that it caused damage, but they didn't clarify what the damage was specifically.

    It looks like too many were figuratively caught with their pants down when on the loo and then they got embarrassed by that.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  15. Re:Former CIA Officer: President Obama Should Pard by davester666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unfortunately, the US gov't now considers and treats the American people as "the enemy".

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  16. Re:The other side of the coin by jopsen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. Russia needs to pay for Snowden's food and lodging.

    [citation needed], Russia doesn't pay him anything. They merely allow him to live in Russia.