iPhone 7 Home Button Now Requires Skin Contact To Work (todaysiphone.com)
Gone are the days of pressing the home button of your iPhone with an inanimate object. With the new iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus, the home button can only be activated when in contact with skin. TodaysiPhone reports: The new "solid-state" Home button found in the new iPhone 7 and 7 Plus appears to require skin contact to function. As the season gets colder, and as people put gloves on, users will quickly realize that attempting to unlock the iPhone with said gloves or with a sleeve of a shirt over your finger will not work. And with the new lock screen in iOS 10, there's no way to bring up the passcode screen without pressing the Home button. Tests have shown that using gloves designed for touch screens will get an iPhone 6s Plus to unlock but not an iPhone 7 Plus. As most of us know, the Home button in the iPhone 7 is no longer a physical button -- it sits flush and uses the iPhone's haptic feedback to give the sensation of a button press. Because the button requires skin contact, it's lead us to believe that the Home button on the iPhone 7 uses Touch ID to figure out if you're pressing the button. The report notes that Carl Hancock on Twitter was able to activate the Home button using gloves made to work specifically with touch screens. The reason (in a nutshell) why we cannot interact with the capacitive Home button when wearing gloves is because the gloves block the body's natural conductivity -- humans conduct electricity and Apple's new Home button (as well as most touch screens) has an electrical charge. On the flip side, the reason why the Home button registers our skin is because it distorts the screen's electrostatic field at the point of contact, thus triggering an action.
Considering that the fingerprint scanner and the screen already needed meat, what's the difference?
To unlock you need to use your fingerprint, a password, a pin/pattern, or a slide with some meaty appendage anyway, right?
Now I need to buy new headphones *and* new gloves?!
It sucks balls: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
On every smartphone, when were you able to use (regular) gloves to interact with a touch screen smartphone?
Where it never gets cold...
It demands an offering of human flesh to work!
Sometimes I need skin contact to work too!
If this is true, this product is dead, here in Finland. Alternatively, Apple fanboys will have to live with frostbitten fingers. And not even their blind dedication to the cult of Apple will carry to those extremes. Right?
"The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
finger, nose, tit or penis....how about VOICE for accessibility features?
What?!?!?!
We must now be able to capacitively couple with a device to unlock and use it's capacitively coupled UI?
Outrageous!
Tuff Luv! Lose that FAT!
>> ...attempting to unlock the iPhone with said gloves or with a sleeve of a shirt over your finger will not work
Oh my! What is this world coming to? The suffering of actually touching the phone with an un-gloved hand in the cold.
Use your nose instead. problem solved without frostbite on fingers.
I saw this a few years ago so can't claim originality :)
So many ACs are incapable of reading the summary to the end where it says "able to activate the Home button using gloves made to work specifically with touch screens". Never seen a touchscreen glove with silver threads, huh? Poor boy...
Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
After all, any hipster would put on gloves before it gets cool.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
To press the iHome on the iPhone, you have to use proper iGloves, approved by Apple. Now in any Apple store...
"Yes, Siri."
Capacitive gloves video here: http://www.imore.com/iphone-7-...
Also works with new Apple iGlove, yours for only $79.99.
systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
You may have been able to use the home button with gloved hands, but you couldn't use anything else. How would you type in the security code with those same gloved hands? Or use the fingerprint scanner. Or, if you didn't have it locked, how would you tap on an app or do anything on the screen?
So we went from 1 out of 984098340983405910435809238509480198345 interactions being able to be performed ungloved to 0 out of 984098340983405910435809238509480198345. The horror!
I heard a story a while back that there was a town where the people use sausages to operate their cell phone when it gets too cold. Having spent the last 6 months working with a mobile test automation framework, I think it would be easier to build an Arduino-powered robot equipped with a sausage and a camera. A mobile-testing abomination, part meat, part machine! Because fuck, Apple sure doesn't make it easy to test on their shit! Naturally, you'd have to replace the sausage every so often, when your sausage robot starts getting smelly. That's just a design consideration, really.
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
You mean the part where it says that tests with these gloves have NOT been able to unlock the new iPhone? No, never read that. And apparently you didn't, either.
"...attempting to unlock the iPhone with said gloves or with a sleeve of a shirt over your finger will not work."
Smell that innovation, baby! This is a huge step forward in "user-hostile" design and should be applauded as such.
In other words, "Fuck you, loyal Apple users! We just made our premium gadget harder to use, so suck it, fanbois!"
An Apple spokesgoblin commented, "Next year we'll remove the screen and speaker and replace them with 4 more cameras."
You total lack of reading comprehension is breathtakingly awesome, you stupid fuck.
"Gone are the days of pressing the home button of your iPhone with an inanimate object. With the new iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus, the home button can only be activated when in contact with skin. TodaysiPhone reports:
The new "solid-state" Home button found in the new iPhone 7 and 7 Plus appears to require skin contact to function. As the season gets colder, and as people put gloves on, users will quickly realize that attempting to unlock the iPhone with said gloves or with a sleeve of a shirt over your finger will not work."
Tests have shown that using gloves designed for touch screens will get an iPhone 6s Plus to unlock but not an iPhone 7 Plus
Guy doing waterproof test on iPhone 7 is wearing some sort of gloves that seem to work on both the home button and the touch screen (he unlocks the phone at the very start of the video) : https://youtu.be/3-DtMyn7jfo So, it's not only skin that can operate the home button.
But then there's this:
"The report notes that Carl Hancock on Twitter was able to activate the Home button using gloves made to work specifically with touch screens."
FC Closer
"The report notes that Carl Hancock on Twitter was able to activate the Home button using gloves made to work specifically with touch screens."
FC Closer
Perhaps he could activate the button, but it doesn't say he was able to unlock the phone.
Why don't people do about 5 minutes of testing (OK, maybe 15)? Get 3-4 pairs of capacitive gloves and try it. Possible explanation for why it might not work is if it is set to fingerprint unlock it needs no-kidding fingerprints.
Hey, look, the gloves work fine:
http://www.imore.com/iphone-7-...
See if you'd bought a Samsung it would have cooked your sausage.
Rest assured apple fanboys and girlz will be rubbing their skin parts on it when they get their filthy hands on them.
Actually, if you are going to use iphone 6 with one hand, you have to cut the fingernail of your thumb regularly, otherwise you cannot push the home button easily.
Picture it: legions of users who reverently raise their iPhones before their faces every time they use it -- so they can press the button with their nose.
Sieg Apple!
Yes, it does say that. It also says above that that it isn't able to be unlocked with gloves made for touch screens. As usual, a lame summary that is contradicted by the added editorial text leaving us to wonder which one is correct.
"The report notes that Carl Hancock on Twitter was able to activate the Home button using gloves made to work specifically with touch screens."
Are those wireless iGloves from Apple at $150 a pair? First people were holding iPhones wrong now they're touching them wrong?
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
only $299
Have gnu, will travel.
It feels like fire after about 20 minutes of using a device. About all I can do is swipe the phone open.
I have to use a stylus. I've gone thru expensive stylus... wore them out... lost them.. and finally If found an inexpensive stylus at dollar stores they sell 3 for $5. These stylus last a long time. You have to use a finger nail to pinch the rubbery tip back in occasionally to extend the life. Now, I've bought and lost about 12 of them and my house is at saturation. I will lose the ones I'm using but find some that I lost so I haven't had to buy any more.
She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
Ah, yes. The once-common glove, now the new Tamagotchi.
Celebrities in Gloves
In our courageous new world, instead of offering to light some starlet's cigarette, the power move is to walk up say, "hey, can I swipe your seven?"
"You, bet, buster. I was waiting for a real man to come along and recognize that not all haute couture comes with a silver lining."
"Not to worry, I'm sure Versace will buff up on Michael Faraday, just as soon as someone in the company (outside the accounting department) finally passes Math 11."
That's the price you pay for a waterproof button.
Now pay the devil you fools.
Are those wireless iGloves from Apple at $150 a pair? First people were holding iPhones wrong now they're touching them wrong?
BAD TOUCH!
As an EMT I always wear gloves on scene. There are numerous apps which are good reference sources which get used on scene. If in fact the new iPhone 7 can't be turned on while wearing gloves, there is a huge number of first responders that most likely won't be upgrading to the new iPhone.
More technology designed for use in a temperate location - more Californian technology for Californians.
Outside the bubble of perfect dry weather that California tech companies live in, it rains, it's cold and you have to wear gloves, sometimes it snows and is frosty.
iPhones you can't use with gloves or in rain, Tesla "autopilots" that can't handle snow and rain, Google self-driving cars that only work well on quiet, dry, well-marked roads, and so on and so on.
iPads you not only can't use with gloves, but which you can't use easily with lights behind you, sun at a low angle, or so on - only suitable for rooms with subdued lighting.
Services that assume you have a mobile data connection at all times.
From the rest of the world to California: Get out of your state more and make us things we can use where we live.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled"
They phones get so warm you don't need gloves.
*Tadum* *Crash* *Thud*
Thank you, thank you, I'm here all week.
We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
Or Apple could take a look at something like the Note 5. Mine works with normal gloves, like my motorcycle gloves that are nothing special, not "special silver thread" imbued. Just a good screen design.
Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
Yeah! That way they would sell just (only) as many iphones as Samsung sold Note 5s! After all what company wouldn't want to see their sales tank...
Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
Officer will you let me explain what happened. I had to sew human flesh to my gloves because I couldn't unlock my phone without taking of my gloves.
Meanwhile, newer Android phones are going *back* to the physical buttons because they work better. I'm betting that the lack of a physical button on the iPhone 7 will be a short-lived fad.
Hey, having a screen that works great with standard gloves is really a nice thing. No need to have special gloves on at all. But then, I don't worship at the altar of the Shiny Fruit, so...
Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
Oh that's ok, choosing to cheap out on an inferior insecure product because you can't stand to expose your fingers for a few seconds is a valid option for all Inuits.
Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
A few seconds? What do you use your smartphone for that only requires a few seconds of screen contact? I guess if you were just using it as a phone, that would be fine, but then why buy a smartphone?
If you are frequently using your phone when it is cold, you'd be taking your gloves off and putting them on again a lot. Which at the very least would be quite annoying.
And its a twisted logic than considers a product with superior hardware to be an inferior product. (The software it runs more a matter of personal preference than anything else)