Slashdot Mirror


'Transformer' BMW Turns Into A Giant Robot (vice.com)

An anonymous Slashdot reader quotes Motherboard: Real-life Transformers are apparently already a thing thanks to a Turkish company called Letvision. They can't do battle with Decepticons, but they can turn their heads from side to side and move their arms and fingers and, erm, shoot smoke from between their legs. Oh, and they can do the whole changing from a 2013 BMW to an upright robot bit [video]. That's pretty cool, too.

But of course there's a catch. Each of the four available Transformers (which Letvision gave the copyright-friendly name of "Letrons") has a functional steering wheel, but you can only "drive" them remotely because Letvision stuffed the seating spaces with the hydraulics and electronics needed for the conversion.

Letvision's demo video has the clever title "Rise of LETRONS", and shows the vehicle spontaneously beginning its transformation after a newscaster announces, "Our country is under invasion by extraterrestrials."

45 comments

  1. Disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well that's rather disappointing. It doesn't so much as transform as the side panels pop out and it rears up on a single pivot near the back wheels. When it does something a little more like the below transformer (and walks) I'll be a little more impressed.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jxa2T8_NDos

    1. Re:Disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they could turn BMW drivers into pleasant people we'd all be impressed.

    2. Re: Disappointing by itomato · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, definately more of a GoBot.

    3. Re: Disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say that would be as hard as turning Volvo drivers into good drivers. Probably both impossible

    4. Re:Disappointing by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The main joke being probably that in Germany, a low-end BMW is the stereotypical car for young Turks wanting to show off.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Disappointing by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well they are all angry that they couldn't afford a Mercedes.
      However I expect it is you is angry at them and portray when even a BMW driver is bad, that you put them all in the same bucket, while someone who may be equally nasty in a beat up Honda, you just classify as some low level slob and drive away in your fancy newer car, confident that you are better than that.

      However it is Baby Boomer thing, to try to show status based on the car they drive, less so in Gen X and even less in Millennials. It would be interesting to see if this changes over time, when Gen Xers get those high level positions and Millennials get steady work and jobs.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:Disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't be jelly. Now go back to work, peasant. lol

    7. Re: Disappointing by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Still a better love story than...eh, scratch that - still a better Turkish movie than Dunyayi Kurtaran Adam.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  2. A better idea by destinyland · · Score: 1

    Serious question: Why can't they just invent a car that folds up into a smaller car so it's easier to park?

    1. Re:A better idea by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Please pay attention, there's already several of those on the market.

      https://encrypted.google.com/s...

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You call that a car? That's more like a glorified wheelchair.

    3. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Serious question: Why can't they just invent a car that folds up into a smaller car so it's easier to park?"

      Because the car would be (way) more expensive.

    4. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would cost a whole lot more than it is worth. And it wouldn't scale....if everyone had one of these, parking spaces in general would be smaller, so it would be just as hard to park (and EVEN HARDER for people that don't have a shrinking car).

      But that isn't so much why they can't, as to why they won't. And anyway some people have, but it hasn't caught on.

    5. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its already hard enough to get a decent crash rating, it would probably be almost impossible with a car that folds up.

    6. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered your inability to park is related to you lying to yourself and ruining your spatial awareness?
      Instead of insisting you had an 11" throbber, perhaps you should get someone with a tape measure to give you an accurate measurement.

    7. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered your inability to park is related to you lying to yourself and ruining your spatial awareness?
      Instead of insisting you had an 11" throbber, perhaps you should get someone with a tape measure to give you an accurate measurement.

      Hrm. I just did as you suggested and it's only 8".

      It's still impossible to find parking in New York though.

    8. Re:A better idea by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Please pay attention, there's already several of those on the market.

      https://encrypted.google.com/s...

      That's just several links referring to the same car.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    9. Re:A better idea by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      You call that a car? That's more like a glorified wheelchair.

      Pfffffttt.......we already got Transformers in most Chevy Camaro dealerships and here is proof! ;)

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    10. Re: A better idea by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      A car *is* in most cases a glorified wheelchair.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  3. boring by luther349 · · Score: 1

    you can drive it so its just a giant rc car.

    1. Re:boring by luther349 · · Score: 1

      cant drive it

    2. Re:boring by hey! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a giant radio control toy. Nothing cool about that at all.

      In general extremes of anything are cool. Along those lines the real problem is that the robot needs to be bigger. That said, what would be even cooler is to go the other direction: make a toy that does this transformation, but which would fit on the nail of your pinkie finger. That would actually be awesome.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  4. Why did they even bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks fucking retarded. Can't do anything. It's super slow. Not cool in any way. Why did they even bother? I don't get it. Lame project after lame project, set to dramatic/epic music... and it's just shit. Don't even bother.

    1. Re:Why did they even bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why did they even bother?"
      Because they are emotionally stunted misfits who devote significant amounts of their adult lives to recreating the experience of wanting to buy a toy, a toy that inevitably failed to live up to its promises.

      Its rather sad, really. Just think if they had lusted after with their sister's Barbie dolls instead... Fembots!
      (Anatomically correct...)

    2. Re:Why did they even bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      realdoll.com

    3. Re:Why did they even bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "realdoll.com"

      Ah, yes...
      I am not entirely unaware, but you may be, because that is just the visible surface part of the iceberg, that under which much much more is available; and some of these under-icebergs are very very much more anatomically correct indeed.
      Ahem...
      (Just noticed, somehow the Slash between "after with" in my initial post went walkabout...)

      If anybody is still with us, seek out Kit Reed's "Automatic Tiger". I read it wen I was ten, just after it was published, and I am very old now... and Ms. Reed is still Alive!
      It's an Allegory of course; Man goes into a Department Store and buys a closeout electro-mechanical Tiger, with Fur, and Glowing Yellow Eyes, and Everything. Everything that is in the real nature of a Tiger.
      The word "Imprinting" wasn't common then, but Imprinting happens mutually, inevitably, and tragically, here in this slim spare novella.

      These grossly immature, (Have you read the language in their website? Even Google Translate does better...), Turkish Toy Boys really haven't a clue. Even whatever Hasbro has transformed into, won't be interested in "Letrons".
      But as for Automatic Turkish Tigers... an Automatic Turkish Caspian Tiger... the last Turkish Caspian Tiger went extinct in Turkey in 1970...

      Boys and their silly little toys.

  5. That will come in handy... by petscii · · Score: 0

    when you need to change the thermostat and the water pump.

  6. Marketbots, roll out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Company makes big, expensive, flashy toys.

    Company makes the slashdot front page.

    Mission accomplished.

  7. I hate this "a thing" bullshit by epyT-R · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Especially when it's used as a justification in an argument ("sorry, that's not a thing"). It's even worse than abuse of the word 'literal.'

    1. Re:I hate this "a thing" bullshit by Pikoro · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's literally even worse than abuse of the word 'literal', which is a thing.

      FTFY

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    2. Re:I hate this "a thing" bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You should read this.

    3. Re:I hate this "a thing" bullshit by Chrondeath · · Score: 1

      In an argument I generally see it used as a shortened version of "That's not a thing that exists," which seems like a legitimate point to make in the cases where it comes up.

    4. Re:I hate this "a thing" bullshit by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      To me, it's laziness. Instead of making a proper counter, it's the equivalent of saying "nuh uuuhh because I said so."

    5. Re:I hate this "a thing" bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My only objection to "a thing" is that the meaning can be very ambiguous depending on context. I don't think that's the case here.

      In context, I think the author clearly means
      1) This is "a thing [that exists]". I'm also not bothered by the idea of arguments around this definition. It exists, or it doesn't.

      2) This is "a thing [that is relevant to this conversation]." It's annoying or rude if it's used to justify being dismissive of someone's argument or opinion without giving it any consideration, but I'm not bothered by the "a thing" phrasing any more than any other way to be dismissive.

      3) This is "a thing [that is generally noteworthy or meaningful.]" See 2). In certain contexts, I would find it rude to tell a guy that something important to him is completely unimportant to most people by saying something is not a thing, but changing the wording generally wouldn't make it less rude. And if people want to debate the general noteworthiness of something, why not?

  8. Turkish dorkery is off the charts ... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Living in Germany turks and people of turkish descent are a part of everyday life. We've got roughly 3 Million people with turkish heritage, many in 2nd and 3rd generation, and turkish is the second most spoken language here.

    What I've long since discovered is that when Turks go dorky, they clear the bar for dorkyness in an instant.
    The video and the tacky pseudo-transformer it features is about as turkish as it gets in that regard. :-)

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  9. I reversed your counter, it's not a thing. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    "Counter" is not a noun.

    Unless you meant "instead of making a proper counter, he used a binary-shift-left over a 16 bit register", or "instead of making a proper counter, he stuck a plank of wood on a pile of cinder-blocks."

    This is as annoying as saying "reversed" to mean "reverse engineered"

    1. Re:I reversed your counter, it's not a thing. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      It is a noun in this context as well (scroll down a little: "noun: the act of making an attack while parrying one (as in boxing); also : a blow thus given in boxing")

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:I reversed your counter, it's not a thing. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      "Counter" is not a noun.

      This is false. I have counters in my kitchen and bathrooms.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  10. Not really what I'd consider a 'robot' by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    Car mode looks fine, but the humanoid mode looks like the robot is standing in the unaltered rear third of the car, and the arms and head look useless.

    If it can't walk or pick up things, it's not good enough yet.

    This one looks like it's not quite as advanced as this one: http://mashable.com/2014/10/23...

    Only a human-sized model last I checked, but far more functional.

    1. Re:Not really what I'd consider a 'robot' by myrdos2 · · Score: 2

      Having worked in robotics, I can tell you that there are three levels of performance that people use to evaluate robots:

      1. Can it navigate around obstacles?

      2 .Can it get me a beer?

      3. Can it find Sarah Connor?

      Saving mankind from Megatron has got to be a 4 at least.

  11. Happy Meal Transformer at best by aicrules · · Score: 1

    While a cool project for the nerd world to enjoy, it is basically a full size version of a McDonald's Happy Meal tranformer. A far cry from the original hasbro toys, and obviously nothing ever approaching the complexity displayed in the movies. We can wait to welcome our new robot overlords, this one isn't a concern lol.

  12. complete garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is complete shit garbage

  13. What is a robot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is a car not already a robot?

    I teach robotics, but I'm constantly mystified at people's definition of robot. Can anyone explain how a backhoe is not a robot? What about a printer? Air conditioner? Blender? Bread maker?

    It amuses me that people can scavenge a bunch of parts from "non-robots" to make their robot. But they don't think of the original item as a robot.

    My clothes washer has a computer that allows it to weigh the load, sense fabric type, inject more or less water, heat the water if necessary, drain water, inject detergent, spin/agitate, lock/release door, and report realtime progress. What more does it have to do to be a robot? Fold the clothes?

    Most cars today are drive by wire in many ways. From throttle to brakes, you tell the card what to do then its brain does a bazillion senses and calculations to make that happen the most efficient or safest or fastest or smoothest way. It mixes the fuel and air just right, it applies just the right amount of pressure and monitors traction. It warns you before you back into something. It charges your cellphone, and allows you to control music from your separate MP3 player. It adjusts suspension and fires airbags under controlled circumstances. It wipes your windshield. It turns on lights automatically and turns them off automatically. Automatic opening/closing doors, low tire pressure sensors, climate zones, automatic seat positioning, automatic transmission. The list is endless. How is this not a robot?