Slashdot Mirror


US Believes Hackers Are Shielded By Russia To Hide Its Role In Cyberintrusions: WSJ (newsmax.com)

According to a report from The Wall Street Journal (Warining: may be paywalled), U.S. officials are all but certain that the hacker Guccifer 2.0, who hacked the Democratic National Committee in June, is connected to a network of individuals and groups who are being shielded by the Russian government to mask its involvement in cyberintrusions. Even though the hacker denies working for the Russian government, the hacker is thought to be working with the hacking groups Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear, which have ties to the Russian government. The Wall Street Journal reports: Following successful breaches, the stolen data are apparently transferred to three different websites for publication, these people say. The websites -- WikiLeaks, DCLeaks.com and a blog run by Guccifer 2.0 -- have posted batches of stolen data at least 42 times from April to last week. Cybersecurity experts believe that DCLeaks.com and Guccifer 2.0 often work together and have direct ties to Russian hackers. Guccifer 2.0 said in a Twitter direct message sent to The Wall Street Journal that he wants to expose corruption in politics and shine light on how companies influence policy. The hacker said he also hopes to expose "global electronization." "I think I won't have a better opportunity to promote my ideas than this year," Guccifer 2.0 added in a long exchange with a Journal reporter. The Journal cannot verify the identity of the person sending messages on behalf of Guccifer 2.0, but the account is the same one that was used to publish personal information about Democrats. A posting on a blog run by Guccifer 2.0 says he is a man who was born in Eastern Europe, has been a hacker for years and fears for his safety. "I think u've never felt that feeling when u r crazy eager to shout: look everyone, this is me, this is me who'd done it," the hacker wrote to the Journal. "but u can't." WikiLeaks officials didn't respond to requests for comment on whether Russia fed them the stolen files published by WikiLeaks in July. A representative for DCLeaks.com asked the Journal to submit questions via email but hasn't responded to them. Last week, U.S. intelligence chielf James Clapper said it "shouldn't come as a big shock to people" that Russia is behind the hacking operation. While Russia has tried to interfere in U.S. elections since at least the 1960s by spying and funneling money to particular political groups, "I think it's more dramatic maybe because now they have the cyber tools," he said.

19 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. So what? by Nyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doesn't matter who is doing the hacking, what matters is how serious the USA takes with it's security measures to protect computers/devices from being hacked to begin with. And to be quite honest, the USA Government doesn't take it's computer security serious at all. That you can tell from letting Clinton off with her mismanagement of her server and the fact that our Government wants back doors in everything even though they keep being told that is how you get hacked.

    Let's not even get into the encryption bullshit.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re: So what? by bestweasel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Trump says we don't know it's the Russians, and he knows about the cyber.

      Does that help?

    2. Re:So what? by ravenshrike · · Score: 2

      Sooo, the Russians are hacking us now, but totes weren't interested in hacking us while Hillary was Secretary of State? Is that your position?

  2. Ties to Government? by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nothing but PR=B$, news at eleven all citizens of a country have ties to their government. They have ties to the government at Federal level, ties to the government at state level and ties to their government at municipal level. Look a whole article about immunity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... So US spies have immunity when they break other countries laws and are safe from extradition, not just computer crimes but even rape and mass murder and no matter how public those crimes have been those American criminals are still be protected. Even an entire war based on lies, the criminals behind that, are still being protected, hence the desperate bid to corruptly elect another guaranteed not to prosecute high crimes, criminal is being elected. Remember those hacking stories about hacking of state electoral roles and patches to security, now were those patches to fix or to break security and is the electronic fix in. I'd bet a substantial amount of the Russian hacking is actually the CIA and it's private for profit contractors pretending to be Russian, keeps the NSA and FBI off the backs and drives more CIA contractor revenue (NATO command is screwing about in there as well, separate from the US government, collusion between US/UK/German/French corrupt players).

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    1. Re:Ties to Government? by Burz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      FBI is not even interviewing the CEO of the server farm where the attacks were launched. He says he'll even provide logs, but no one is asking. I think the US govt knows it won't be good for their image.

    2. Re:Ties to Government? by jandersen · · Score: 2

      Just making an observation in passing, and I may be completely wrong, of course, in which case somebody can earn a few, cheap points by correcting me; but over the recent years there has been a number of similar articles about "Chinese Hackers", and the majority view has always appeared to be that this was undoubtedly true. Now we have seen a few articles saying exactly the same abour "Russian Hackers", with more or less the same level of authority behind, but now, apparently, it is "obviously wrong". Why is that?

    3. Re:Ties to Government? by tinkerton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Could be, but what I'm certain of is that the pentagon has decided a while back it needs Russia as an enemy, for budgetary reasons let's say, so we are /will be getting a constant stream of russian evil.

    4. Re:Ties to Government? by wiredog · · Score: 2

      " it is "obviously wrong". Why is that?"

      Russian astroturfers all over the net.

    5. Re:Ties to Government? by loonycyborg · · Score: 2

      Strictly speaking neither Russia nor US can do anything wrong or right, because you need to be a single person, or at least a single mind to do anything. Since the whole idea of a nation of doing something is nonsensical it's very amenable to manipulation, if you buy into nation as person meme then you can be convinced to do absolutely anything.

  3. A Lot of Effort to Bury the Lede by Kunedog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So the mainstream press really never did come up with a way to spin the DNC Leaks.

    They've repeatedly shown they had NO answer except to try to ignore the real story (like with Snowden), and pretend that the source of the info is more important than the fact that the DNC was nothing but a branch of Hillary's campaign, colluding to push Bernie to the side at all costs.

    1. Re:A Lot of Effort to Bury the Lede by wiredog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, shame on the Democratic Party for supporting a lifelong Democrat who had done massive amounts of work to support other Democrats over the Socialist who became a Democrat recently only so he could run for President. They should've been more like the Republicans!

  4. James Clapper is now a reliable source .. by bongey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The same James Clapper that lied under oath about NSA spying and has this fancy website http://www.hasjamesclapperbeen....

  5. The rumors are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is why I run an IP filter list that includes all of Russia and most of Ukraine on the sites that I manage. Sure there are a couple of honest Russians that just want some information, but 99% of their traffic is attacks.

    When 90+% of an entire nation is hack attempts and attacks, it's just easier and better for me and my clients to deny them access.

  6. WikiLeaks by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    What was said:
    http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07... (July 27, 2016)
    ""Perhaps one day the source or sources will step forward and that might be an interesting moment some people may have egg on their faces."
    That sounds like the classic US insider going to the press. The Pentagon Papers, Watergate, a person with information going to the media who can give a lot of information due to their access.

    Now the media is pushing ever more about some nation who can access data, look over the data, stay in a distant network, get the data in plain text, move the data out and not get caught.
    Once US security experts look over the vast amounts of litter left on the network its some "Bear" code they all know about and tell the press about.
    The code and method of access is so well understood that easy to find logs, code, ip details go to the waiting press.
    The same very early private sector security experts talking points to the media then get picked up by gov and other media and reported as some long term gov investigation...
    The origins of what was found and how it was traced become forgotten only that an existing well understood method was left to be found.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  7. This Is How Rumors Get Started by g0rd0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is also why I run an IP filter list that blocks all of Russia and most of Ukraine from every site I maintain. 99.9% of their traffic is hack attempts and attacks. If 95+% of a nation's users are up to no good, then it is in my and my client's best interest to ban the entire nation. Nothing personal, and nothing against the Russian people, but 99.9% of their internet traffic is shit.

  8. Content is king by cfalcon · · Score: 2

    It doesn't matter that Russia wants to "interfere" with our elections. What matters is how they go about it. If they go about it by dumping what is actually going on- the hidden truth- who could argue against that?

    Given the highly political nature of the topics, and the fact that there's a lot to be gained by blaming a state actor instead of discussing the improprieties and casual ethical violations disclosed... well, even if it isn't the Bear-pair behind it, there would be plenty of people claiming that it was for personal and political advancement.

    1. Re:Content is king by g0rd0 · · Score: 2

      Then why not hack Trump's tax returns? Russia is acting deliberately and forcefully to influence the American electorate.

  9. New top 40 hit: "The Ruskies did it!" by bradley13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yahoo: It's not our fault that our security sucked, and that we didn't tell anyone about it for two years. The Ruskies did it!

    DNC: It's not our fault that we got caught rigging primaries - the Ruskies did it! It's not our fault that Hillary's poll results suck - the Ruskies did it!

    Everybody together now: "It's not our fault - the Ruskies did it!"

    Can we put that to music? Seriously, this is ridiculous. Even if it were true (which I doubt), it's still ridiculous.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  10. Re:Here comes the propaganda machine, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The new Cold War started when Russia went back to its old habit of invading its neighbors.

    Whether you noticed or not tells us nothing about the situation, it only tells us about you.