Slashdot Mirror


Police Complaints Drop 93 Percent After Deploying Body Cameras (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader writes:A study from Cambridge University documents an immense drop in complaints against police officers when their departments began using body cameras. But even more surprising is that the data suggests everyone is on their best behavior whether the cameras are present or not. The data was collected in seven police departments, and represents over 1.4 million hours logged by 1,847 officers in 2014 and 2015; the researchers published their data last week in the journal Criminal Justice and Behavior. Officers were randomly assigned to wear or not wear cameras week by week (about half would be wearing them any given week), and had to keep them on during all encounters. The authors used complaints against police as a metric because they're easy to measure, an established practice in most police forces and give a good ballpark of the frequency of problematic behavior. In the year before the study, 1,539 complaints in total were filed against officers; at the end of the body camera experiment, the year had only yielded 113 complaints.

15 of 332 comments (clear)

  1. Correlation? by dunnomattic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I saw this earlier, I wondered if it's A) the small group of inherently bad cops curbing their bad behavior now that they are being monitored; or B) fewer [perceived] opportunities for dishonestly reported complaints. I imagine it is some combination of the two.

    --
    ...when everything is a crime, everyone is a criminal.
    1. Re:Correlation? by rlp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Spoke to a local police chief. When someone wants to file a complaint, he offers to review the patrol car / body cam video with them. If its a legit complaint, he wants to see the video. If not, the offer to review the video usually causes the complaint to be withdrawn.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
  2. It goes both ways... by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Police don't want to be filmed doing dumb shit.
    Citizens stop acting like jackasses when they too are being filmed.
    Situations don't escalate as frequently.

  3. Re:Of course by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I'll grant you that the data can be explained by competing theories, in this case only half the officers had cameras on. That certainly suggests that it's not limited to officer behavior.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  4. Re:Oh, Democracy... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think you mean "Oh, Science..."

    The majority of studies show that accident rates go up, not down, when red-light cameras are put in place. Eliminating red-light cameras is the logical response.

    This study shows that complaints go down, not up, when police use body cameras. The logical response would be to continue using body cameras and continue studying the results to verify that the effect isn't temporary or isolated.

  5. Not just complaints by ebonum · · Score: 5, Informative

    Convictions and and plea deals change A LOT with body cameras. Before, you put someone in a suit and train them to say "Yes Sir/No Sir" in front of the judge. Then give the judge and everyone else the dog and pony show of how he's an A student and wants to start a business taking care of puppies. This trick doesn't work so well when there is video of a raving lunatic high on drugs taking swings at the cops.

  6. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We've put cameras everywhere. People now routinely carry them in their pockets. We have not photographed Bigfoot. We have no video of aliens. The existence of the Loch Ness monster is not a proven fact.

    We have hours and hours of video of corrupt cops. We have video of cops shooting unarmed people. We have video of cops beating unarmed people. We have video of people being arrested and phones being smashed simply because cops believed they were being filmed.

    Yes, when cops carry cameras, and their activities are recorded, and they know this, and they can not turn them off, their behavior changes. For the better.

  7. Re:Of course by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Usually it is brutality causing a feedback of intensity. The police man stops a guy, he is tense, that makes the policeman tense, which makes the guy defensive, which make the policeman to be more aggressive, that makes the guy feeling like he will need to fight to protect himself, which causes the policeman to fight back... With this feedback loop someone will cross the line first.

    Having the camera, makes the guy less defensive, as he knows if something does happen to him there will be evidence, and the same with the policeman. Which desculates the feedback loop, as it puts a gap in the emotional response, knowing whoever crosses the line first will be the one who loses.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  8. Re:Oh, Democracy... by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 5, Informative

    Red-light cameras are a tool for revenue generation with a growing body of evidence of their abuse. Police body cams however are supposed to be an impartial witness.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  9. Re:Of course by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The behavior already changed radically and virtually overnight. The only matter up for debate is why.

  10. Re:Funny thing is by Kaenneth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wanna blow a conservative's mind?

    Most Police are Union members.

  11. Re:Of course by ThomasBHardy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find it difficult to attribute a preponderance of the change onto the public. The individuals who might have normally filed a complaint would have no inclination to not file a complaint when the officer in question was not wearing a camera.

    If the reduction in complaints matched the likely hood that a camera was involved, sure, I'd agree that the numbers track. I find it far more likely that the officers, knowing there's a chance that someone is recording (themselves, their partner, or another unit that shows up) are acting on their best behavior in all cases and thsi have a larger impact on the overall results.

    The two factors together are likely what is influencing the outcomes.

    --
    Warning: Teh poster of this messaeg is lysdexic
  12. Re:Of course by war4peace · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The behavior change stays when off camera for a simple reason: knowledge that data comparison can be used against you.
    Officer john wears the camera one week and gets 3 complaints. Next week he doesn't wear the camera and gets 30 complaints. It's safe to infer he behaves like an asshole when off-camera, so, to counter that, he is NOT an asshole even when not wearing the camera.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  13. Re:Oh, Democracy... by starless · · Score: 5, Informative

    The majority of studies show that accident rates go up, not down, when red-light cameras are put in place.

    Accident rates may go up (or stay the same) but death rates go down.
    The increase in accidents is less dangerous relatively slow speed rear end collisions, while
    side on higher speed, and so more deadly, rates go down.
    http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/public...

  14. Re:Of course by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Alternately: while being polite for the week with the camera on, he realized there is a better way to interact with people, and it gets better results.
    I doubt many police like getting tons of complaints, so he was happier when his complaint count went down.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."