Slashdot Mirror


Guccifer 2.0 Dumps a Bunch of Clinton Foundation Donor Data (engadget.com)

The hacker Guccifer 2.0 today released a large database of information reportedly stolen from the Clinton Foundation. The dump, Engadget reports, includes names, addresses, and emails of both individuals and corporate donors as well as their contribution amounts. From the report: This, of course, isn't the first time Guccifer or his friends at Wikileaks and the Kremlin have attempted to subvert the US political process during this election cycle. Just last month Guccifer released Democratic Vice Presidential nominee, Tim Kaine's personal cell phone number. What's more, nearly half of the country's state voter registration systems have recently come under cyberattack, according to the DHS, though the FBI has not yet determined if those breaches originated in Russia. There are also a number of unanswered questions regarding Republican nominee, Donald Trump's, connection to these attacks. Four House Democrats recently demanded that the FBI investigate the nominee after he "jokingly" suggested that Russia find and release the 33,000 emails reportedly missing from Hillary Clinton's private email server.

4 of 404 comments (clear)

  1. Desperate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Guccifer or his friends at Wikileaks and the Kremlin"
    Just tell us what happened without participating in the propaganda will you? This is embarrassing for all reporters.

  2. Re:Well that was a well balanced summary by amicusNYCL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but can you honestly say that there are no unanswered questions for Trump?

    I have a question for you - when the list of the Clinton Foundation donors gets leaked online, why are you talking about unanswered questions for Trump? Isn't this story about Clinton? Because I can think of at least one question for Clinton - how did the database of donors for The Clinton Foundation get stolen? Where and how was it being stored? Those are a couple unanswered questions right off the top of my head, maybe you can think of some more.

    It seems like the summary kind of takes this track:

    The Clinton Foundation donor database got leaked.
    Russia has been trying to subvert the US political process!
    Nearly half of the US states have had their voting systems attacked! (but we don't know if the Russians did that, and we don't even know if it's connected to the Clinton Foundation database leak)
    There are "unanswered questions" for Donald Trump.
    Four Congressmen want Trump investigated by the FBI.

    That seems like a weird direction to head off into when this is a story about the Clinton Foundation donor database getting stolen and leaked. It's almost like that small collection of facts are unrelated to each other.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  3. Re:Lost emails by _xeno_ · · Score: 5, Informative

    Deleting all the emails isn't a crime, and if she's "guilty" of storing confidential emails, deleting them is her duty.

    WHAT?!!! Uh, NO .

    If you ever hold a security clearance, the proper procedure for dealing with classified information leaks will be drilled into you. The very first thing you get taught - repeatedly - is you do not delete classified information if it leaks.

    The process is pretty simple: you disconnect from the network, go into "airplane mode" if necessary, and then immediately stop using the machine. You don't delete anything, you don't close any open programs, you immediately call the security people and you let them clean up the mess.

    This leaves a paper trail. But it also makes sure that the information spill is known, that how far it leaks is known, and that any potential spill to uncleared individuals is known.

    So if Hillary did delete emails with classified information, she - well, broke procedure. I have no idea if it's a law or just an official process. But there's a process and procedure for dealing with classified information leaks, and deleting anything is 100% not it.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  4. Re:Lost emails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually she had a duty to preserve all documents related to her job as SoS.

    She had a duty to delete confidential material. She did as required, and is accused of a crime of deleting documents, when she was required to, by law.

    No, she has no such duty. Her duty is to stop using the machine and hand it over to the appropriate security officers to investigate the extent of the leak.

    Stop just making shit up. It does nobody any good to just spout lie after lie after lie. I can see why you like her so much, though!