Slashdot Mirror


New Study Suggests There's a Limit To How Long People Can Live (go.com)

Life expectancies have risen in many countries around the world thanks to breakthroughs in medical treatment and sanitation in the last century. The maximum age of death has also increased. But as these numbers continue to rise, it raises the question as to how long can people live? ABC News reports: The record for the world's oldest person is 122 years and the odds of shattering that record are slim, according to an analysis published Wednesday in the journal Nature. In the new study, researchers [at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York] analyzed mortality data from a global database. They found that while there have been strides in reducing deaths among certain groups -- children, women during childbirth and the elderly -- the rate of improvement was slower for the very old, those over 100 years old. Next they examined how old centenarians were when they died. The record holder is Jeanne Calment, of France, who lived until 122 years old. Since her death in 1997, no one has broken her record. The researchers calculated the odds of someone reaching 125 years in a given year are less than 1 in 10,000. They think the human life span more likely maxes out at 115 years. Some aging specialists said the study doesn't take into account advances that have been made in extending the life span -- and health -- of certain laboratory animals including mice, worms and flies through genetic manipulation and other techniques. The goal is to eventually find treatments that might slow the aging process in humans and keep them healthier longer.

14 of 290 comments (clear)

  1. Life Quality vs. Life Quantity by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would much rather die healthy, sane and in the middle of doing something I love at age 90 than I want to be a drooling vegetable that needs help to do even the most basic chores like wipe myself after a visit to the toilet but living to the age of 130.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    1. Re:Life Quality vs. Life Quantity by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would much rather die healthy, sane and in the middle of doing something I love at age 90 than I want to be a drooling vegetable that needs help to do even the most basic chores like wipe myself after a visit to the toilet but living to the age of 130.

      My father had a massive heart attack at age 50. He didn't feel well that day and decided to lay down instead of eating supper. He never woke up. He died laying in his standard sleeping position, leading us to believe that he never even woke up at all.

      I consider him lucky, frankly.

      His mother had a stroke at age 73 and spent her last 2 months unable to think straight, have a conversation, get out of bed, feed herself, etc.

      I'd much rather just have the quick heart attack.

    2. Re:Life Quality vs. Life Quantity by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's why I want to go peacefully and in my sleep like my grandfather, and not screaming and frightened like the other passengers in his car.

  2. Similar study performed in the 1490s by JoeMerchant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A similar study, performed with all available data in Portugal and Spain in 1490, would confirm zero percent chance of successful crossing of the Atlantic ocean to a western shore.

  3. New study rediscovers old knowledge by ITRambo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    46 years ago I took a college course on senescence. George Sacher developed an equation that calculated the maximum life span for any species, based on five factors. There are always a tiny number of exceptions to the rule. Humans were calculated to, on average, have a maximum life span of 120 year. This "new" study seems to be rediscovering old information.

  4. Re:Genesis 6:3 NIV by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Funny

    For I am the God of HellFire - and I bring you - FIRE!

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  5. Re:Inigo Montoya by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Funny

    What does he say next?

    You have reached 115 years. Prepare to die.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  6. Re:telomeres? by HBI · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Religion itself is a product of human frailty inasmuch as, at the personal level, religion mostly acts as a salve to the reality of guaranteed mortality. It's not altogether surprising there are other ways in which humans are illogical in their responses to this reality of death.

    In both cases, an illusion of control is maintained.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  7. Re:Inigo Montoya by tsqr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sure that's just an average maximum.

    LOL, what?

  8. Re:Genesis 6:3 NIV by 31415926535897 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The first time I read that, I thought the same thing...oh, people are only allowed to live to 120 years old now. But read the chapter again carefully, the phrase means that the flood was coming in 120 years. The 120 years is how long Noah had to build the ark.

  9. Re:Genesis 6:3 NIV by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I also had a sneaking suspicion that "lunar months" and "years" got conflated in the account of the Patriarchs.

    Either that, or the whole thing was made up.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  10. Re:Genesis 6:3 NIV by TemporalBeing · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah but Genesis 9:29 also says:

    And all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years: and he died.

    Noah was born pre-Flood. And if you follow the geneologies, they lifespans increasingly shorten with each successive generation; thus not an immediate effect but something that took a few generations to take in.

    So I guess the LORD forgot, eh? And don't forget about Adad, Seth, Enosh, Cainan, Mahalalel, Jared, Enoch, Methuselah, Lamech, Shem, Arphaxad, Shelah, Eber, Peleg, Reu, Serug, Nahor and of course Abraham.

    Most of those you quote were Pre-Flood; however, that doesn't change the lifespan curve that occurred post flood. Abram (who could have known Noah as their lifetimes slightly overlapped) made it to 175 (Genesis 25:7). Joseph (3 generations later) only made it to 110. Genesis 50:22-26.

    As with Death in Genesis 3, the shorted lifespan did not happen immediately. Could it have? Probably, but that would have had several major consequences:

    • Slower re-population of the earth post-flood
    • Inability to communicate the past to future generations using eye-witnesses that were able to fully establish what actually happened through numerous generations across the vast majority of the populace.
    --
    Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  11. Re:Genesis 6:3 NIV by aethelrick · · Score: 5, Informative

    Noah was born pre-Flood. And if you follow the geneologies, they lifespans increasingly shorten with each successive generation; thus not an immediate effect but something that took a few generations to take in.

    Also... the bible is not a trusted reference source. It was written by people who weren't there, repeatedly re-written by people with poor translation skills (not to mention political agendas to achieve). Each new interpretation of "The word of God" heralded as an unchanging, perfect holy text. Codswallop!

  12. Re:Genesis 6:3 NIV by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Informative

    I prefer Ezekiel 23:20

    There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch