Slashdot Mirror


Baltimore Police Took 1 Million Surveillance Photos of City (go.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from ABC News: Baltimore Police on Friday released data showing that a surveillance plane secretly flew over the city roughly 100 times, taking more than 1 million snapshots of the streets below. Police held a news conference where they released logs tracking flights of the plane owned and operated by Persistent Surveillance Systems, which is promoting the aerial technology as a cutting-edge crime-fighting tool. The logs show the plane spent about 314 hours over eight months creating the chronological visual record. The program began in January and was not initially disclosed to Baltimore's mayor, city council or other elected officials. Now that it's public, police say the plane will fly over the city again as a terrorism prevention tool when Fleet Week gets underway on Monday, as well as during the Baltimore Marathon on Oct. 15. The logs show that the plane made flights ranging between one and five hours long in January and February, June, July and August. The flights stopped on Aug. 7, shortly before the program's existence was revealed in an article by Bloomberg Businessweek. "We have a real opportunity to police smarter," Commissioner Kevin Davis said. "The old days of looking at a spike in violence, and marching orders to stop everyone that moves in hoping of identifying a suspect or a witness -- we have to move away from that type of policing. I just believe that taking advantage of this technology opportunity was a prudent thing to do."

74 comments

  1. of course, they did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just as your USA municipality.

  2. If you have nothing to hide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you won't mind Big Brother watching you.

    For public safety. And freedom.

  3. "Mayor didn't know" by hsmith · · Score: 1

    Yeah bullshit. Mayor's office pushes policies on the police department and drives what they do and how they enforce law. They are exactly the ones that pushed this.

    1. Re:"Mayor didn't know" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SRB is such a weak politician. I wouldn't be so sure of that... I could easily see the BPD doing whatever the fuck they want... things are fucked up in baltimore.

    2. Re: "Mayor didn't know" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The wire was based on facts. Sad part is, ain't shit changed.

    3. Re:"Mayor didn't know" by armanox · · Score: 1

      You clearly aren't familiar with Baltimore...

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  4. US resident for 60 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Land of the free. Home of the brave.

    Good to see we're still aspiring to the ideal.

    1. Re:US resident for 60 years... by sittingnut · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      if ideal was to turn the land of the free to land of the herd, home to irresponsible(how could they be responsible? they are not free) welfare junkies immersed in an ignorant, superficial, culture of death, it is nearing full realization in usa.

    2. Re: US resident for 60 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dr d us your sick,your Ill,your terminally stupid,your criminals,your retards and any other usless part of your society you wish to rid yourselfs of.
      We will let them breed together and make the world's worst mongrel mess,and then unleash them upon the world to create havoc and death where ever their reach can take them..
      You have an un-equaled record for the damage that you have been able to wreak in the hundred years that you have been more than a back water dump,you will begin to pay the price soon..
      You have managed to make most other historic empire builders look good..You started as a bunch of back shooting tax evadeing slavers,full of BS,you've not changed since then..
      Your bits in the history books will be short and un-complimentary..

    3. Re: US resident for 60 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. Another euro child molester.

  5. Good work guys! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, even if we make the generous assumption that lots and lots of aerial photos are a useful tool, rather than some combination of vendor snake oil and lazy technophiles looking for any excuse to sit in some sort of 'command center' with a comfy chair and some giant monitors instead of having to go outside and do boring police stuff; how is secrecy a good plan?

    Solving crimes is nice; but what people really like is when your 'deterrents' cause them to just not happen in the first place. You might be able to justify some concealment of the fine details in order to frustrate attempts to circumvent the measure; but keeping the existence of the entire program secret massively reduces its potential as a deterrent, which is effectively choosing to have more crime in the hopes of closing more cases rather than increasing the perceived risk of engaging in crime.

    There are, of course, other reasons for secrecy; but they aren't very flattering.

    1. Re:Good work guys! by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When your metric of success is arrest numbers and not reduction in crime a deterrent does not matter.
      Personally I think the thousands of separate police forces run by local governments across the USA just do not individually have the scale to be run like the best of professional law enforcement elsewhere.

    2. Re:Good work guys! by Falos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's bad if a PD uses that as their metric of success - it's really bad if someone else tells them that. They're going to be gaming the system as instructed. You're going to get a plateful of gimmicks handed back to you.

      Same as telling schools/teachers their funding depends on grades. Same as telling a wage slave that Metric XYZ is gospel in your house. Same as every oversimplified impetus.

    3. Re:Good work guys! by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      how is secrecy a good plan?
      Think of the command center sized GUI on the wall. Rent on or no bid heat maps, wifi tracking, voice print upgrades, p2p tracking, onion routing ip finder.
      What once the clandestine services had is now within the budget of a city or state task force.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Good work guys! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      bad if a PD uses that as their metric of success - it's really bad if someone else tells them that

      Indeed. Which is why it's a mess to have so many tiny little police forces at the beck and call of small local governments instead of forces large enough to be more professional.

    5. Re:Good work guys! by swb · · Score: 2

      I've read that criticism with regard to police shootings -- there's so many police forces and so many of them are small, use of force training has no chance of being uniform across all departments nor does the quantity and quality of training have a chance of being the same.

      In the Minneapolis/St Paul metro area there are maybe three dozen suburbs plus the core cities, almost all with their own police departments not to mention 3-4 county sheriff departments (depending on how far out you want to measure the metro area). In theory a criminal could operate in a corner where 3 jurisdictions abut and no or low quality information sharing could hurt police efforts to combat crime as well.

      It sure makes sense and leads one to believe there should be a single police force.

      Although I can think of a couple of issues -- policing in downtown Minneapolis is a different ball game than policing in suburban St. Louis Park, so do separate departments adapt better to local environments better?

      Then there's a kind of freedom argument -- does a panoply of law enforcement enhance freedom by diffusing authority and making it more accountable to local populations? Multiple organizations tend to make for a thinner layer of middle management as well. And the limits of scale to any one department would seem to serve as a limit on creating "intelligence" branches that focus on running stingrays and other surveillance systems.

      I'm in sure in some ways it may be worse as well, a burglary in Minneapolis doesn't get much in terms of investigation while one in wealthy Edina may get more attention.

      In some ways, I think a metro-area police department makes sense from a logistical perspective. Yet I suspect that it would possibly devolve into something not much different than we have now -- politics would dictate that a metro area force have individual precincts that generally followed existing geographic boundaries, essentially re-creating the same structure only less accountable and with more overhead.

    6. Re:Good work guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not about crime reduction. It's about control. These "photos" are videos with a one second framerate. They are stored FOREVER. So if you threaten to gain political influence that the guys controlling these videos dislike, well you and everyone you know or rely upon will have their history rewound in a search for any leverage against you. That's what is being sold. The first contract for this company was in Mexico. You know, the Mexico where if your gang becomes dominant then it's members are then made police officers. Radiolab covered this company and there was no mention of corruption in Mexico when the gee whiz aspect of this tech was being discussed. The potential for abuse is huge. The way to control this tech to make this acceptable is also obvious (data encrypted and only released to specific agents under publicly viewable warrant). The press on this ignores the obvious manipulation this tech affords and ignores any mention of requiring constitutional safeguards.

    7. Re:Good work guys! by reboot246 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I certainly don't want one huge national police force at the beck and call of one strong corrupt centralized government. We've seen that in other countries and it usually doesn't go so well for the people.

    8. Re:Good work guys! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      When your metric of success is arrest numbers and not reduction in crime a deterrent does not matter.

      Neither of those are important metrics. The metric that matters to most PDs is the number of civil forfeitures.

    9. Re:Good work guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solving crimes is nice; but what people really like is when your 'deterrents' cause them to just not happen in the first place.

      The best deterrent to crime is boots on the ground: cops walking a beat interacting with the people (serving and protecting), with swift reinforcement available.

    10. Re:Good work guys! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Other nations do it at the state level or regional level to avoid the current overtly common situation of polices forces run by corrupt local government. They then apply the doctrine of separation of powers. None of this shit where a mayor can get a sysadmin dragged off by the police just for being on the wrong side of office politics.

  6. Voyeurism at it's best by donaldm · · Score: 1

    So taking over a million secret aerial photographs is supposed to stop crime and terrorism?

    If another person or organization did this I suppose they could plead that they did this for the good of the community. I'm sure the police would believe them.

    --
    There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    1. Re:Voyeurism at it's best by Falos · · Score: 1

      Please show us your Because Terrorism license.

    2. Re:Voyeurism at it's best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How good were the shots of nude sunbathers?

      Or a study where to place parking inspectors.
      It is unlikely to find tanks and artillery pieces or enemy formations.
      with one million pictures - I'm going to send recon teams to those rooftops for an in depth study.

  7. Old school vs. Technology by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The old days of looking at a spike in violence, and marching orders to stop everyone that moves in hoping of identifying a suspect or a witness -- we have to move away from that type of policing..."

    Ah, so the method of blanketing a particular area for a specific amount of time as a justified response to criminal activity isn't good enough at generating enough arrests, so the answer is to use technology to perform mass surveillance against thousands of innocent people for months, even when there is no justified cause to do so, in order to generate arrests and revenue.

    Believe me, you don't have to offer up pathetic excuses about the "old days". We get why the fuck you're really doing this. And not only is it disgusting, it's unconstitutional and should be illegal.

    I propose anyone still wanting to claim we have Freedom in the United States be charged with criminal ignorance. It's quite obvious the police state we now live under mandates otherwise.

    1. Re:Old school vs. Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the police are flying over the city taking pictures of nothing in particular except the city itself. The only thing they are surveilling is the city infrastructure, vehicular traffic, and the top of the heads of pedestrians going about their business. And they are taking still photos not video. Why are the police wasting money to do something that has very little impact on crime? And why are the proles wasting time ranting over the outrage of the day? If they wait 15 minutes I am sure they can identify the next outrage of the day and promoting petty bullshit non-issues into an extinction level event? You want to see some real survellience take a trip to any major European capitol, especially London, and check out the live video cameras mounted on damn near every city street.

      Running survellience flights over an entire city while not focusing on any one area is a waste of resources. Utilizing a police drone to monitor events such as Fleet Day can be useful in this day and age. City traffic monitoring would be another use that can augment the existing traffic cameras. But the fact is once you walk out your door and enter public spaces your expectation of privacy vanishes.
      And the government has these things called satellites which are capable of reading your license plates from orbit but using the satellites to cover not only the US but any place else in the world of interest is a waste of resources. However, if the government becomes interested in a particular area or person they do have the necessary tools to do so.
      What the government really has is a toolbox full of cyber tools that are really effective when focused on a specific target. Here is something to think over. The US is always blaming some foreign country for cyber attacks against the US and in some cases they may be right. I don't think the government makes these accusations without at least some evidence. They are probably conflicted when they do make these accusations because they risk showing capabilities they would rather keep quite. However you never hear of any US adversary blaming the US for trying to hack them. So the question becomes is the US not engaged in cyber espionage against foreign powers or is the US so good at it the targets do not even no they have been compromised?

       

    2. Re:Old school vs. Technology by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      I propose anyone still wanting to claim we have Freedom in the United States be charged with criminal ignorance.

      We can't do that, that would be unconstitutional. ;)

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:Old school vs. Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Unconstitutional" *is* "illegal", dumbass.

      Your government isn't of or from you, it's a bunch of elites gone fully self aware and fucking you down into slavery and loving every minute of it.
      Fuck the government.
      Rise up.

    4. Re:Old school vs. Technology by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      I propose anyone still wanting to claim we have Freedom in the United States be charged with criminal ignorance.

      This was the funniest part about people claiming that only the US should control ICANN because we are the only ones with "freedom".

    5. Re:Old school vs. Technology by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      More like because in these days of Alice Through The Looking Glass political correctness actually increasing police in an area of high crime would be called racism?

      So they either try to do things in secret like the above or more likely what is happening in just about every major city in the country you let the inner city become a slaughterhouse thanks to Ferguson effect making more and more cops simply unwilling to do their jobs for fear of being accused of racism. Sadly we can look to the UK to see where this leads where one of the largest pedo rings in history operated without fear because the cops were afraid of being called racist if they stopped them.

      Think Chicago hitting over 500 murders in a single year was a big deal? Wait until next year when I have no doubt it will double, why? Because cops simply will not go into those neighborhoods and the criminals know it so its a free for all. They have already seen with Darren Wilson it doesn't matter if everything from eye witnesses to forensics shows you were being attacked by someone that had just pulled a robbery, all the MSM cares about is race so their only logical move is to leave the inner cities to the criminals.

      But don't worry, I'm sure the stink this program is causing will insure Baltimore PD will not do anything in the future, well other than send the meat wagon to pick up the bodies that is.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    6. Re:Old school vs. Technology by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      I kinda understand your concern here, but are you cool with Google maps?

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    7. Re:Old school vs. Technology by geekmux · · Score: 1

      I kinda understand your concern here, but are you cool with Google maps?

      Taxpayers aren't footing the bill for Google maps.

      And since consumers voluntarily give up their GPS-tracked privacy when using Google maps, it's highly unlikely that anyone would label it as unconstitutional either.

      Oh, and speaking of voluntary, this form of mass surveillance didn't exactly start with EULAs mailed to every taxpayer in the city. It was carried out in complete secrecy.

      Perhaps when Google maps starts filling courtrooms with cases built on parallel construction, I'll have more of a concern over a tool built for navigation vs. one specifically deployed and illegally used for crime enforcement.

    8. Re:Old school vs. Technology by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about the fact that there's are satellites overhead taking pictures of the planet daily. More than likely those satellites were paid for, at least partially, with tax dollars.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    9. Re:Old school vs. Technology by geekmux · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about the fact that there's are satellites overhead taking pictures of the planet daily. More than likely those satellites were paid for, at least partially, with tax dollars.

      In a theoretically perfect government with proper oversight from the associated accountability office, they should be charging any third party enough money to at least cover project costs and protect the taxpayer investment.

  8. Smile! You're on Candid Spy Camera! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have a nice day Baltimore.

  9. Radiolab covered this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.radiolab.org/story/...
    There's a stream link at the top. If you want to save the mp3 for later, open in vlc and find the source url in 'codec info'.

    Tl;dr version- This type of surveillance is mind-bogglingly useful in very high-crime areas, but if abused will quickly degrade into the worst 1984 scenario I can imagine.
    For now I'm not too worried unless the system scales down to fit easily on a drone or something. Modern aircraft are still at least possible to spot visually or on low-end radar.

    1. Re:Radiolab covered this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Baltimore, most of the crime is concentrated within the city limits which is geographically small compared to the surrounding suburbs.

      The problem confronting the Baltimore PD is that there is a push by the Baltimore politicians to make the city safe at the same time as orders from the same politicians to not interfere any behaviour not clearly criminal. E.g., the trial of the police officers for the accidental death of Freddy Gray sent a clear message to the PD not to lay their hands on any black people under any but the clearest circumstances. And thus the riots were partially due to the politicians explicitly making the call that the police couldn't intervene earlier.

      "stop and frisk" is clearly not on the table, so it seems to me that the plane surveillance was an attempt to satisfy the requirements of reducing crime and not touching people. Naturally, it has some privacy implications tough.

  10. Why not just record video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    314 hrs * 60mins = 18840mins of flight.

    1 000 000 photos / 18840 mins of flight = 53 photos for every minute of flight taken.

  11. Can't be that big of a secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard all about it on Radiolab.

    http://www.radiolab.org/story/update-eye-sky/

  12. Re:it's Baltimore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuke the entire site from orbit--it's the only way to be sure.

  13. Re:it's Baltimore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    found the southern inbred redneck from alabama...

  14. Re:it's Baltimore by sexconker · · Score: 0

    What you said is no less offensive or racist or whatever than what the parent AC said, FYI. You're no better than them.

  15. A picture is worth a thousand words? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who will care if they have a million pictures of someone tossing grenades into a crowd on the street?

    A picture may be worth a thousand words, but cops on the street may be worth a thousand lives.

    You can't stop/prevent everything, but you may deter a lot, and may put an end to a violent event sooner, limiting casualties.

    Sitting back and documenting it all as it unfolds is stupid.

  16. More info on RadioLab podcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was covered in RadioLab's recent podcast episode "Eye in the Sky," about Ross McNutt's company Persistent Surveillance Systems, and how the police in Baltimore didn't have to get permission from the city's mayor in order to operate. http://www.radiolab.org/story/eye-sky/

  17. Re: it's Baltimore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worse actually.

  18. Re: it's Baltimore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, I don't see a suggestion to bulldoze Alabama there.

    For all you know, they may support education and emotional support instead. Quick to judge, aren't you? Just because we recognize the inbred Southern rednecks, doesn't mean we don't want to help them.

    They, on the other hand, have stated their desire.

  19. Re:it's Baltimore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QLV1I4J_HU

  20. Useless data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The city of Baltimore can't afford the GPU time to make those images useful for anything other than an enormous monthly EBS bill.

  21. Old tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a spike in violence, and marching orders to stop everyone ...

    Nuclear reactors have control rods to interfere with the fission process, electric junctions have circuit breakers to prevent electricity flowing. Even the police thought 'stop and frisk' was a good idea. It's a simple mechanism that seems to affect a lot of physical and social processes.

    ... move away from that type of policing ...

    How many of the surveillance photos led to arrests? When the police are already watching vehicles via plate readers and traffic cameras, what does an expensive airplane add to the data? What makes taking photos via an expensive airplane, 'smarter'?

    This is the police attempting push-button crime prevention, almost literally, in this case.

  22. Did it prevent any rapes or murders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or lead to any arrests for these crimes?

  23. 11 hours of video by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Wow at 25 fps that is 11 hours of video. They were seriously ripped off.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  24. Uhh.... by easyTree · · Score: 2

    Donut hunt

  25. Police Smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We have a real opportunity to police smarter," Commissioner Kevin Davis said.

    "But", he added, "we'll just keep picking on black people because it's easier".

  26. Imagine, by Lenin by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Eye in the Sky

    Another Big Brother tool for China and Russia to use to continue stamping on a human face, forever. No more "imagine" needed.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  27. They *can* get the same training at the same schoo by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > -- there's so many police forces and so many of them are small, use of force training has no chance of being uniform across all departments nor does the quantity and quality of training have a chance of being the same.

    The use-of-force training can be exactly the same, taught by the same instructor, with cops from different departments in the same class if you prefer. Each department doesn't have to run their own training school, and shouldn't, for most things.

    In Texas there's a place called TEEX - you may have seen part of it, Disaster City, on TV. TEEX trains firefighters and some police from not only all over Texas, but from all over the world. Unlike a department-run academy that runs once per year, TEEX staff is mostly full time, year-round instructors, with topic-specific experts brought in for special classes. Because their facilities are in use year-round, with multiple facilities being used by different classes simultaneously, they can afford better facilities than any one department.

    There's another advantage as well. Because TEEX has some of the best facilities and staff in the world, private companies want use it from time to time, for testing fire safety or new equipment for fire fighters, police, and paramedics, and car companies use the driving facilities to test car safety, etc. They pay well. So you end up with the extra money Fire Trucks, Inc helping to offset the cost of training for Podunk County PD.

    Lastly, it gives Texas a full-time team of expert first responders ready to go for any emergency. The Search and Rescue team from TEEX is well known nationally, in S&R circles. In many states, the S&R team is regular cops and firefighters who train in S&R a couple of weeks per year. Texas Task Force One train S&R all day, every day. They responded to World Trade Center, the Oklahoma City bombing, and I watched them roll out toward Katrina the day before it made landfall.

    So there is that option. You *can* have everyone get the same, very high-quality training from a dedicated training organization, then supplement with classroom or on-the-job training specific to a particular department. The urban and suburban departments can add their own along with the consistent training. Also, the training center (TEEX etc) offers more than one class. A rural department can choose a TEEX class that covers dealing with wild animals or grass fires, while an urban department chooses an extra class on de-escalating situations, crowd control, or high-rise fires. Both would probably get the same use-of-force classes.

  28. Is it any wonder? by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Short of deploying the MD National Guard, there is no policing that will have any effect some of these war-torn neighborhoods in Baltimore. Make no mistake -- this is just as bad as South Side Chicago. The gangs absolutely control not only the streets, but the jails too. Witnesses are ruthlessly threatened, and any cooperation with police results in violent reprisal. The stop snitching culture rules all. Most kids have no fathers present and the idea of education itself is ridiculed. The gang banger MO now is to walk up to someone in broad daylight and unload the high capacity magazine of your large-caliber handgun into your victim's head (yeah, despite some of the most rigorous gun laws in the nation including a ban on such magazines). After a hot weekend in the summer, you often end up with a body count inline with Falluja or Aleppo, Because no one cooperates, often camera footage is the only evidence available to help catch these thugs. Unless forces from outside the city decide to stop this cycle of violence by a) ending the "war on drugs" and b) truly deciding that "Black Lives Matter," therefore gangs destroying black neighborhoods are incompatible with civilization itself, then absolutely nothing will change, ever. Though the surveillance program should have been disclosed, I cannot fault the city for thinking outside of the box and trying to gain some sort of assistance in combating this horrific violence. Please take a look at this article from the Baltimore Sun published this AM to get some perspective on *why* stuff like this is even considered.

    1. Re:Is it any wonder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Police are allowed to lie in the course of their job.
      Police are allowed to issue 'lawful orders'.
      Police often do not know the law.
      How are we expected to respect that?

    2. Re:Is it any wonder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... walk up to someone in broad daylight ...

      The police have recently militarized but they use all that weaponry on robbing citizens under civil forfeiture laws, not establishing a police presence in high crime areas. Strange, that police won't use their dangerous weapons against the dangerous people.

      ... Because no one cooperates ...

      The police cannot break the "no snitch" policy in the neighbourhood so they will have to attack the power of the gangs directly. One idea would be to incarcerate gang members in another city, or a private prison in another state: It would reduce the control criminals have over the city when they're in prison.

      ... the city for thinking outside of the box ...

      It is a good start but it will only teach gang members to commit murders indoors. You've already admitted the policies enabling this violence need to change, meaning ultimately, taking photos will achieve little.

  29. Hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember this the next time you hear a story about the street photographer who gets stopped and harassed by the local police for taking pictures of the wrong building or, god forbid, someone taking pictures of COPS in the act of doing something stupid.

    Seems Law Enforcement loves the ability to keep you under surveillance at all times. Themselves not included, of course.

  30. Say What!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The old days of looking at a spike in violence, and marching orders to stop everyone that moves in hoping of identifying a suspect or a witness"

    So they're suggesting the choices are that they harass a bunch of people or the public allows them to surveil the entire city likely at a cost of millions of dollars per year? I assume their next "option" is going to be they get legal authorization to "randomly" search homes without a warrant or they'll send groups officers to areas with a crime and try to lie their way into "voluntary" home searches and those who don't allow the searches will be harassed or their lack of cooperation will be used as "evidence" that they're doing something illegal. A better option than any of these might be to encourage the community to cooperate/assist police via reasonable, accountable and respectful police behavior instead of threats, intimidation, harassment & a complete lack of accountability.

  31. Officer Obie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were they all on color glossy 8x10s with circles and arrows pointing to the scene of the crime?

  32. In-depth look at Persistent Surveillance Systems by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some might be curious about the system, the company who deploys it, and exactly how it works and how they coordinate with local law enforcement: https://www.bloomberg.com/feat...

  33. Radio Lab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radio Lab should get the credit for exposing this.

  34. Re: it's Baltimore by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    Alabama is beautiful! Come to Mobile, and you'll find it, comparatively, like New Orleans. Mardi Gras was started here.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  35. BalPD Unloads Up-Skirt Photos To Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! What an operation to look up women's skirts! And payed for my Federal Government money from the Treasury.

    "Never before has duct-tape and a mirror gone so far."

    Ha ha

  36. Re: They *can* get the same training at the same s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tax payers can float the bill. And when nothing changes but the size of the execs pockets, we will be right back to where we are now.

  37. New police state by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    1 million images taken resulting is zero crimes prevented. Your hard earned tax dollars at work AND welcome to the new police state people.Get the hell out of the planes and get out of your cars and start preventing crimes. cops are not helping prevent crimes because they are being over paid METER MAIDS more interested in giving tickets.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  38. Clarify perhaps? 10% cost to Texas taxpayers by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say. Perhaps you could clarify. You mentioned "tax payers can float the bill", so I'll give you a bit of information about that.

    With the TEEX model, about 10% of the TEEX budget comes from the state of Texas - from Texas taxpayers, but actually about zero percent because TEEX sends money back to the state at the end of the year. A large percentage of funding comes from training first responders from other countries; Mexico and Canada spend a lot at TEEX having their first responders trained, as do many of the oil producing countries because TEEX has mockups of oil rigs, pipelines, etc that are rigged to catch fire, collapse, etc. Other states such as California send their people to TEEX for training. Other get a good deal, but provides some revenue. The best deal for taxpayers is private companies who get the training or use rent the facilities - Chevron etc have their own firefighters and other emergency workers on staff who train at TEEX, plus there's product testing.

    Texas taxpayers get Texas Task Force 1 and other benefits of having the training center more or less for free. Btw you can also get free TEEX training online. Their cybersecurity courses are pretty decent.

  39. 1 FPS huge megapixels. Rewnd/Ffwd to see where car by raymorris · · Score: 1

    It's 1 frame per second with enough resolution to watch a 25 square mile area and follow a car as it drives away from a crime scene, as well as rewind to see where the car came from. When a crime occurs, you can rewind to see the bad guy drive up, then watch to see where they go. I want one! :)

  40. PS the decided they can't zoom closer than a car by raymorris · · Score: 1

    PS the company decided that they will not build a system with resolution better than enough to follow a car, which will be about six pixels or so.They won't build something that can see a face. Of course another company might.

    Along with crime/security for something like the Super Bowl, they can assist with wide-area real time views of natural disasters, they've done traffic flow analysis to watch traffic jams form in real time, etc.

  41. Drones: Not just for your "enemies" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? Did people think surveillance drones were just for countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, and Yemen? Those countries were just the demo/proof of concept. As much money as we spend on the military and its equipment, state and local police departments are a far bigger market with plenty of access to our tax payer dollars. Drone manufacturers know this and could care less about our constitutional rights.