Slashdot Mirror


Beijing Said Facebook and Google Are Welcome Back To China as Long as They 'Respect China's Laws' (qz.com)

Will Facebook and Google come back to China? The Chinese government says they can, as long as they "respect China's laws." From a Quartz report: Yesterday at a press conference held in preparation for the upcoming World Internet Conference, a Bloomberg reporter asked Ren Xianliang, deputy director of the Cyberspace Administration of China (which oversees internet governance) if the government would permit the two American internet giants to re-enter China. Both companies still have business-facing services in China, but Google effectively closed its consumer-facing search engine there in 2010, and authorities have blocked Facebook's social network since 2009. To this, Ren said, "China's internet development has always maintained a policy of openness. As for foreign internet companies, as long as they respect China's laws, don't harm the interests of the country, and don't harm the interests of consumers, we welcome them to enter China, where they can together share the benefits of China's developing internet."

77 comments

  1. We welcome them back to get a huge cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    i.e., they give us a lot of money and share data collected

    1. Re:We welcome them back to get a huge cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      so basically the same terms as the US has for them give us money (tax on income?) and share data (NSA/FBI etc)

    2. Re: We welcome them back to get a huge cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That and China requires censorship unlike the US. Spying is still inexcusable, though so few people seem to care I don't think I've heard it mentioned once this election.

    3. Re: We welcome them back to get a huge cut by fbobraga · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

    4. Re:We welcome them back to get a huge cut by balbeir · · Score: 1

      Ah, the power of the false equivalency !

    5. Re:We welcome them back to get a huge cut by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

      Accept there is one small problem, China's legal system isn't a rule of law system but a corrupt rule of man system. Basically there are some general rules in the chinese legal system but they are changed at a whim in court. A rule of law system is that irrespective of the mood of the judge or the politicians the law is the law.

    6. Re:We welcome them back to get a huge cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know this for a Fact ?
      You have worked as a lawyer in China ?
      Or are you simply repeating jerk circle mantra because it confirms your beliefs about China ?

    7. Re:We welcome them back to get a huge cut by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The issue with China is they now want international respect and equal standing for all aspects of Communist rule on the global stage.
      A court order to recapture someone who escaped China is to be respected and the person sent back as with any normal "criminal" under international law.
      Censorship and account tracking is just part of that legal system and if a US band wants access to the market in China they have to conform.
      No more free exchange of ideas, freedom of speech, freedom after speech. No comments on corruption, pollution, local Party leaders, the movement of funds out of China to buy Western homes, luxury goods, educations or enjoy lavish holidays.
      How does China want to contain anyone wanting to express such news online?
      With "Social Credit". The wrong comments get tracked back to the person and they lose points. So do the friends and other connected people.
      Having any bad credit person connected to you will lower you credit.
      "China 'social credit': Beijing sets up huge system" http://www.bbc.com/news/world-...
      Loss of credit will remove the ability for some jobs, education, housing, easy access to local government and services.
      How to get more credit? Work hard to support the Party line, promote the Party.
      Thats Communist social media with life changing results that Western brands who enjoyed the full protections of US law are now rushing to embrace and totally sell out to.
      In the West its the NSA, GCHQ, NSL, FISA and help with junk encryption, track all emails.
      Its just not the nations laws. The big US brands keep helping the security services and gravitate to the tracking requests of any bureaucracy just to add more users and grow the brand.
      Millions of users been tracked is not customer freedom. They are not free to buy, sell or express any thoughts before during or after a purchase. Are fake, really limited consumers really useful for a US brands growth?
      Users that have to return to a protected brand in China after been reported trying a Western brand too many times?
      They cant buy what they want, rate certain books from Japan or explore the real history of Party leaders without legal issues.
      As new customers that lack of freedom is not good long term.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    8. Re:We welcome them back to get a huge cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Accept there is one small problem, China's legal system isn't a rule of law system but a corrupt rule of man system. Basically there are some general rules in the chinese legal system but they are changed at a whim in court. A rule of law system is that irrespective of the mood of the judge or the politicians the law is the law.

      What if I do not accept it?

      Will my lack of acceptance cause an exception?

  2. "we'll respect your laws..." by v1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... when your laws start respecting your people.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:"we'll respect your laws..." by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      How about "obey Chin's laws?" Respecting that trash is asking a little much...

    2. Re:"we'll respect your laws..." by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      They only do that in Soviet Russia, not China.

    3. Re:"we'll respect your laws..." by johanw · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if there were countries starting to do that, and not for example let their policies be made by big corporations. Look how the US is trying to censor sites that go against its bought copyright laws.

    4. Re: "we'll respect your laws..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which big corporation is responsible for the NSA spying on us?

    5. Re:"we'll respect your laws..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow pot/kettle/black.

      The US is a long long way from being clean its self.
      Per capita it has the highest prison population in the world, by a LARGE margin.
      Guantanamo Bay
      Arcane voter registration systems designed to exclude
      etc etc etc etc etc

    6. Re:"we'll respect your laws..." by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      welcome to free world, FUCK YEAH!!!

    7. Re:"we'll respect your laws..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's really ironic about your statement is, had you made it against the Chinese Government , it would be censored.

    8. Re:"we'll respect your laws..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your passport have some chniese stamps on it or you just quoting what you heard on CNN/FOX?

    9. Re:"we'll respect your laws..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a different anonymous coward, but, yes, I've done business in China, and yes, we've had our advertising "tailored" by the censors.

    10. Re:"we'll respect your laws..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the law there, so if you dont like it simply dont go there. no one "forced" you to do business in china. If people are so unhappy with their laws then simply refuse to do business with them until they change them.

      All this "cake and eat it too" stuff is funny.. Oh china, you are so repressive but we will overlook that for your cheap consumer products.

    11. Re: "we'll respect your laws..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which big corporations aren't helping them do it in one way or another? That might be a shorter list.

    12. Re:"we'll respect your laws..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike some EU countries where you can kill 40+ ppl with a gun and get out of prison in 20 years? Beacuse it's 'mean' to keep someone in jail that long?

      Letting out all the criminals doesn't mean your country is any safer.

  3. Rol!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China's internet development has always maintained a policy of openness

  4. Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we the people issue a similar memorandum?

  5. Come back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China hasn't quite figured out how to steal the code Google and Facebook uses to operate has because it's actually not made in China...

    1. Re: Come back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook? Really? You think it's hard? Fb is only as big as it is because of market share.

      I duplicated its functionality over a weekend once as a review of basic web development. The name didn't stick.

      It was called 'nofriends'. The sub heading was 'the place where losers hang out.'

    2. Re: Come back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it scale to millions of simultaneous users and a billion registered users?

  6. Facebook and Google welcome... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...as long as the agree to China's laws:

    Meaning censorship, sharing data on dissidents, funnel money into China and not take any out, agree to let the state quietly execute any employees who speaks bad about the leadership.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Facebook and Google welcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And no data caps.

    2. Re:Facebook and Google welcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean like the US ?

      Sharing data with the NSA, funnel money into US politicians pockets (lobbyist, campaign donations), buy off food and drug regulations, etc etc etc

    3. Re: Facebook and Google welcome... by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is a slight difference the NSA can't arrest anyone where in China billionaires how don't pay the party dues properly disappear.

      The big thing is censorship. China wants the ability to shutdown google or Facebook has a news story that runs counter to government interests.

      That is huge. Every second of every day Americans are used to hating on government and its interests.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:Facebook and Google welcome... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Meaning censorship, sharing data on dissidents, funnel money into China and not take any out, agree to let the state quietly execute any employees who speaks bad about the leadership.

      You mean like the US ?

      something like it (and the majority of the world)

    5. Re:Facebook and Google welcome... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Meaning censorship, sharing data on dissidents, funnel money into China and not take any out, agree to let the state quietly execute any employees who speaks bad about the leadership.

      If you're supporting any regimes laws, you're almost always going against the human rights of its subjects (good ideas don't require force). China just makes this abundantly clear, so it's an illustrative example.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re: Facebook and Google welcome... by Falos · · Score: 1

      That's thought-provoking; maybe it's because for all the noise we make, we can't do shit anyway. Over there, it's a threat, over here, "lawl we dgaf dwi commoners send a letter to your congressman oh wait it's me"

      Sure, let them complain about the state. Who cares, we own them.

    7. Re:Facebook and Google welcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snowden, is that you?

    8. Re: Facebook and Google welcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you get into all of the fraudulent scheme in the US around voting

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_suppression_in_the_United_States

      So much for being the greatest democracy ...

  7. What China really said: by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As for foreign internet companies, as long as they help us violate the privacy of our citizens, commit human rights violations and destroy any political opposition. (FTFY)

    People equating China and the US have no damn clue how repressive China still is, most especially to it's own people. They have come a long way, but they still have a long way to go. Hopefully they don't decide to start WW3 before they get to a free society.

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    1. Re:What China really said: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China decided many years ago that the best way to deal with the US of A was to kill us with kindness, and as long as that policy continues to work they are unlikely to launch nukes at us.

      As far as China-Russian relations go, I have no clue.

    2. Re:What China really said: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People equating China and the US have no damn clue how repressive China still is, most especially to it's own people. They have come a long way, but they still have a long way to go. Hopefully they don't decide to start WW3 before they get to a free society.

      You think so? The censorship is worse than it was on my first trip there in 2011. I've been back every year (except one) and the Xi regime has definitely tightened the screws on freedom of speech and expression. He's been effective in doing so by going strong on combating corruption and making it look like he's doing things for the good of the nation; of course, what he's doing is cementing his and his party's power.

      But yes, it's awful there. I can't imagine living there or sending someone back there to live after they've been here a while. For all the problems the US has, people have no idea how bad it is in China. I just laugh when all those NY Times articles, written by reporters who've been to Shanghai and maybe Beijing, talk like it's a US lite.

    3. Re:What China really said: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a name and street address, I'll get you a ticket.

      Sadly for you, Nazi Germany no longer exists, but I do know of a culture that still holds to similar ideals and I can try to get you close to there with directions once you arrive.

    4. Re:What China really said: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People equating China and the US have no damn clue how repressive China still is, most especially to it's own people.

      It's all relative. I've heard the Chinese regional governments do a lot of selective enforcement of the highly complex law, and that the norm is to invent imaginative ways around it. It might be that if our (Western) way to enforce the law universally and equally would be applied to the Chinese law as it is, the society would take a significant hit or another revolution even, or at least that is something that the Communist Party is afraid of.
        There are some areas of life, like the peer to peer payment system in the financial markets, which would be regulated out of existence in Europe and in the US just because the potential for money laundering and funding organized crime. The Chinese society is still very fragile because of the obvious singular points of failure. Too bad the observer can't still observe itself without fearing of self-annihilation.

    5. Re:What China really said: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the US still refuses to see how racist and repressive their own society is, how corrupt their political system is.

    6. Re:What China really said: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for foreign internet companies, as long as they help us violate the privacy of our citizens, commit human rights violations and destroy any political opposition. (FTFY)

      After the way they've treated Trump, spied and covered things up especially in relation to wage fixing, I don't see the difference. We'd be wise to ban them in the US as well.

    7. Re: What China really said: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By all accounts they are happy with the 'violate your privacy' bit so "one down, two to go"?

    8. Re:What China really said: by fbobraga · · Score: 0

      People equating China and the US have no damn clue how repressive China still is, most especially to it's own people.

      Luckly, some random guy from /. knows: enlighten us!

    9. Re:What China really said: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many Chinese entry visa's do you have on your passport? You speaking from some first hand experiences here?

    10. Re:What China really said: by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 2

      Racist? We have a black/arab president, a woman leading the race for the presidency, the republicans had a woman and black in the primary, we have had a black man/black woman secretary of state, we currently have a black woman US attorney general and a black man before that. We are probably among the top if not the top multicultural country on the planet.

      Repressive? We are arguably the most free people in the world. We enjoy the freedom of speech, religion, association, etc. How specifically is the US repressive to it's citizens?

      Corrupt political process? There has always been corruption in politics, that is why it is illegal. We must hold corrupt politicians like Hillary accountable. If Hillary is elected, I may agree with that one.

      Regardless of the brainwashing your college professor or MSNBC, you are factually wrong.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  8. don't harm the interests of consumers by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..... don't harm the interests of consumers

    That's pretty much a deal breaker.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:don't harm the interests of consumers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think the consumers are the advertisers and the products are the users.. so why is it a deal breaker in this context?

  9. Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baidu, Tencent and others have eaten their lunch.

  10. So basically... by Chas · · Score: 1

    Never.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  11. here you go. by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    Message(translate("English", "Mandarin", "go fuck yourself")).sendTo("China");

  12. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've already copied the technology; they should return when they have something new for us.

  13. China's Laws? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The CCP has no issue with the concept of social networks. There are Chinese analogs to every US social network: Facebook --> Renren, Twitter --> Sina Weibo, YouTube --> Youku-Tudou, WeChat --> Snapchat/FB Messenger. What the CCP has issues with is social networks to which its censorship officials are not given unrestricted access so that they can remove posts they dislike. China would happily allow Facebook, Google, etc. inside if they get to decide what content can appear on the sites.

    Obviously, this would require granting Chinese officials access to the internal source code and guts of their operations; were business and government not completely connected in China, with seemingly every business either state-owned or owned by someone who's the child or close crony of some top government official (because that's how one succeeds in business in China--knowing and bribing the right people!), this would be a semi-major concern. But as things are, it's a stop sign approximately the size of Hong Kong. Given the CCP's whimsical control and ability to control every aspect of commerce, business, and economy, there's little to stop them from letting US networks in, stealing their source code, banning them from the country "for the good of the people" and/or "protectionism," selling the secrets to a Chinese firm, and then having the Chinese firm proliferate the world. In the USA, this is much harder to happen given the much weaker link between government and business as well as the general lack of regulation.

    There was a recent article that the Chinese government is beginning to exert censorship on Chinese nationals living abroad by disgracing them and attempting to cut them off from the homeland and the culture they know best. You can bet the CCP has no problems doing this to non-Chinese nationals as well by effecting their standards on the world--control the culture and control the people. Heaven help us all if China ever becomes the dominant nation. It doesn't have to be the USA forever. There are many reasonable countries which can be "#1": South Korea, Japan, the UK, France, Germany, Australia, New Zealand...perhaps an oligarchy of all these countries. Just please don't let it be China or freedom as we know it or imagine it is dead.

  14. Yeah, right by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Just like we respect Saudi Arabia's "laws".

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Yeah, right by johanw · · Score: 1

      The US usually respects Saudi laws because they don't bother US interests. However, it does certainly not respect laws in countries that go against the interests of those who pay the politicians: unwanted copyright laws (or worse: lack thereof) is attacked vigorously by the USA.

  15. Counting the days until Facebook is back by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    I'm not convinced that there isn't any price Zuckerberg wouldn't pay to get back into China. But I also admit that I don't have a great opinion of him.

    During this decade I had two girlfriends (not at the same time) who were both born and raised in China ladies. They weren't very fond of the Chinese government, which is why they didn't want to live in China any more. I used to think that a lot of Chinese people were like that. Then I read recently that a Western news agency did a survey in China and they found overwhelmingly that while Chinese people didn't think their government was perfect and they thought that there were some important things that they still needed to do, basically everything was negotiable and they were willing to give it up in terms of personal freedom if they kept making good money. So now I think that the ladies I once dated were the exceptions to the rule and maybe most Chinese people really don't care at all if they have any freedom as long as they're making some sweet cash. This does not bode well long term for western Democracies. Some forces in China in the military are barely under control of the CCP and it's not going to take much to make them go off on their own and start a war that will have disastrous consequences for everybody, including the winners.

    1. Re:Counting the days until Facebook is back by johanw · · Score: 1

      Well, making some money is of course more important if you don't know how to pay for your dinner tomorrow then if you don't know if you can afford that $100,000 car and should take the $60,000 version instead.

    2. Re: Counting the days until Facebook is back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you just discovered is how surveys often times completely misrepresent reality.

    3. Re:Counting the days until Facebook is back by erapert · · Score: 1

      They weren't very fond of the Chinese government, which is why they didn't want to live in China any more. I used to think that a lot of Chinese people were like that. Then I read recently that a Western news agency did a survey in China and they found overwhelmingly that while Chinese people didn't think their government was perfect and they thought that there were some important things that they still needed to do, basically everything was negotiable and they were willing to give it up in terms of personal freedom if they kept making good money.

      That applies to literally every government, doesn't it?

  16. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sure. The country that poisons its own babies for profit is worried about Internet companies harming consumers. Fuck off, China.

  17. on this site, in 1989, nothing happened by Holammer · · Score: 2

    New search result when you google 'Tiananmen Square'. If they accept.

    1. Re:on this site, in 1989, nothing happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      am in china.. serious question: what was on that day?

    2. Re:on this site, in 1989, nothing happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing! Nothing at all...

      (looks around nervously)
      Who are you talking to? What do you know? Stop asking questions!!

  18. Citation: Edward Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Citation: Edward Snowden

    1. Re: Citation: Edward Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post some links, please

    2. Re: Citation: Edward Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is the new URSS, you know: commies! Red danger!

  19. Whataboutists gonna Whatabout. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whataboutists gonna Whatabout.

  20. Re:Corrupt! by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    People throw around the term corruption so much it doesn't mean anything anymore. If a system plays by its own rules, it isn't corrupt. What evidence do you have that the Chinese system does not play by its own rules?

  21. Apple has Caved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make no mistake; there's a reason that Apple has been allowed to succeed in China; they caved fast and easy. That makes Cook's claims that they can't unlock iPhones particularly galling.

  22. Re:Not take any (money) out? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Where did that come from? I haven't seen any reporting that China is preventing money from leaving its borders.

  23. Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who? I've heard of Google and Facebook, but not that other company!

  24. Re:Not take any (money) out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any post about China often has a bit of truth and a lot of BS.
    There actually is a foregn exchange restriction in place:

    --
    It should be noted, though, that foreign nationals can transfer any amount under or equal to the equivalent of US$500 once per day without providing proof that the money was legitimately earned or that taxes have been paid on it. Chinese nationals are able to transfer the equivalent of US$2,000 per day into a foreign bank account, however Chinese nationals face a US$50,000 annual ceiling when exchanging RMB into foreign currencies while foreign nationals do not face such restrictions.
    --

    And like any place with restrictions, there is a very active black market looking to buy/sell foreign currencies at premium rates to get around this.

  25. Re:Not take any (money) out? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    I can attest that, when I flew home from Guangzhou after spending Spring Festival with the in-laws, nobody in the security screening or Customs at Baiyun tried to take away my several very fat hongbao, which very obviously held a lot more cash than one is supposed to be able to take out of the country legally.

    What the Chinese authorities *are* worried about these days are the corrupt businessmen and Party officials smuggling stuff like tens of millions of yuan in cash, gold bars, diamonds, and so forth out of the country, and mainlanders looking to make a quick profit trying to smuggle items that are cheaper in Hong Kong or Macao back to the mainland. At the HK-mainland border, Hong Kongers and foreigners practically get waved through, but the mainlanders tend to receive the fine-toothed comb treatment going both ways.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  26. Re:Not take any (money) out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you hear more about methods used than about that overall goal of keeping money inside china. For example they are really sticking it to anyone who tries to import anything to china. Why do you think chinese bring cans of milk powder by ones and twos from Hong Kong instead of you know, just bringing them by sea containers. They will also stick it to any chinese companies trying to buy western companies. They also have quite a few cash control methods.