Slashdot Mirror


Beijing Said Facebook and Google Are Welcome Back To China as Long as They 'Respect China's Laws' (qz.com)

Will Facebook and Google come back to China? The Chinese government says they can, as long as they "respect China's laws." From a Quartz report: Yesterday at a press conference held in preparation for the upcoming World Internet Conference, a Bloomberg reporter asked Ren Xianliang, deputy director of the Cyberspace Administration of China (which oversees internet governance) if the government would permit the two American internet giants to re-enter China. Both companies still have business-facing services in China, but Google effectively closed its consumer-facing search engine there in 2010, and authorities have blocked Facebook's social network since 2009. To this, Ren said, "China's internet development has always maintained a policy of openness. As for foreign internet companies, as long as they respect China's laws, don't harm the interests of the country, and don't harm the interests of consumers, we welcome them to enter China, where they can together share the benefits of China's developing internet."

35 of 77 comments (clear)

  1. We welcome them back to get a huge cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    i.e., they give us a lot of money and share data collected

    1. Re:We welcome them back to get a huge cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      so basically the same terms as the US has for them give us money (tax on income?) and share data (NSA/FBI etc)

    2. Re:We welcome them back to get a huge cut by balbeir · · Score: 1

      Ah, the power of the false equivalency !

    3. Re:We welcome them back to get a huge cut by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

      Accept there is one small problem, China's legal system isn't a rule of law system but a corrupt rule of man system. Basically there are some general rules in the chinese legal system but they are changed at a whim in court. A rule of law system is that irrespective of the mood of the judge or the politicians the law is the law.

    4. Re:We welcome them back to get a huge cut by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The issue with China is they now want international respect and equal standing for all aspects of Communist rule on the global stage.
      A court order to recapture someone who escaped China is to be respected and the person sent back as with any normal "criminal" under international law.
      Censorship and account tracking is just part of that legal system and if a US band wants access to the market in China they have to conform.
      No more free exchange of ideas, freedom of speech, freedom after speech. No comments on corruption, pollution, local Party leaders, the movement of funds out of China to buy Western homes, luxury goods, educations or enjoy lavish holidays.
      How does China want to contain anyone wanting to express such news online?
      With "Social Credit". The wrong comments get tracked back to the person and they lose points. So do the friends and other connected people.
      Having any bad credit person connected to you will lower you credit.
      "China 'social credit': Beijing sets up huge system" http://www.bbc.com/news/world-...
      Loss of credit will remove the ability for some jobs, education, housing, easy access to local government and services.
      How to get more credit? Work hard to support the Party line, promote the Party.
      Thats Communist social media with life changing results that Western brands who enjoyed the full protections of US law are now rushing to embrace and totally sell out to.
      In the West its the NSA, GCHQ, NSL, FISA and help with junk encryption, track all emails.
      Its just not the nations laws. The big US brands keep helping the security services and gravitate to the tracking requests of any bureaucracy just to add more users and grow the brand.
      Millions of users been tracked is not customer freedom. They are not free to buy, sell or express any thoughts before during or after a purchase. Are fake, really limited consumers really useful for a US brands growth?
      Users that have to return to a protected brand in China after been reported trying a Western brand too many times?
      They cant buy what they want, rate certain books from Japan or explore the real history of Party leaders without legal issues.
      As new customers that lack of freedom is not good long term.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  2. "we'll respect your laws..." by v1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... when your laws start respecting your people.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:"we'll respect your laws..." by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      How about "obey Chin's laws?" Respecting that trash is asking a little much...

    2. Re:"we'll respect your laws..." by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      They only do that in Soviet Russia, not China.

    3. Re:"we'll respect your laws..." by johanw · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if there were countries starting to do that, and not for example let their policies be made by big corporations. Look how the US is trying to censor sites that go against its bought copyright laws.

    4. Re:"we'll respect your laws..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow pot/kettle/black.

      The US is a long long way from being clean its self.
      Per capita it has the highest prison population in the world, by a LARGE margin.
      Guantanamo Bay
      Arcane voter registration systems designed to exclude
      etc etc etc etc etc

    5. Re:"we'll respect your laws..." by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      welcome to free world, FUCK YEAH!!!

  3. Facebook and Google welcome... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...as long as the agree to China's laws:

    Meaning censorship, sharing data on dissidents, funnel money into China and not take any out, agree to let the state quietly execute any employees who speaks bad about the leadership.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Facebook and Google welcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And no data caps.

    2. Re:Facebook and Google welcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean like the US ?

      Sharing data with the NSA, funnel money into US politicians pockets (lobbyist, campaign donations), buy off food and drug regulations, etc etc etc

    3. Re: Facebook and Google welcome... by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is a slight difference the NSA can't arrest anyone where in China billionaires how don't pay the party dues properly disappear.

      The big thing is censorship. China wants the ability to shutdown google or Facebook has a news story that runs counter to government interests.

      That is huge. Every second of every day Americans are used to hating on government and its interests.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:Facebook and Google welcome... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Meaning censorship, sharing data on dissidents, funnel money into China and not take any out, agree to let the state quietly execute any employees who speaks bad about the leadership.

      You mean like the US ?

      something like it (and the majority of the world)

    5. Re:Facebook and Google welcome... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Meaning censorship, sharing data on dissidents, funnel money into China and not take any out, agree to let the state quietly execute any employees who speaks bad about the leadership.

      If you're supporting any regimes laws, you're almost always going against the human rights of its subjects (good ideas don't require force). China just makes this abundantly clear, so it's an illustrative example.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re: Facebook and Google welcome... by Falos · · Score: 1

      That's thought-provoking; maybe it's because for all the noise we make, we can't do shit anyway. Over there, it's a threat, over here, "lawl we dgaf dwi commoners send a letter to your congressman oh wait it's me"

      Sure, let them complain about the state. Who cares, we own them.

  4. What China really said: by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As for foreign internet companies, as long as they help us violate the privacy of our citizens, commit human rights violations and destroy any political opposition. (FTFY)

    People equating China and the US have no damn clue how repressive China still is, most especially to it's own people. They have come a long way, but they still have a long way to go. Hopefully they don't decide to start WW3 before they get to a free society.

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    1. Re:What China really said: by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 2

      Racist? We have a black/arab president, a woman leading the race for the presidency, the republicans had a woman and black in the primary, we have had a black man/black woman secretary of state, we currently have a black woman US attorney general and a black man before that. We are probably among the top if not the top multicultural country on the planet.

      Repressive? We are arguably the most free people in the world. We enjoy the freedom of speech, religion, association, etc. How specifically is the US repressive to it's citizens?

      Corrupt political process? There has always been corruption in politics, that is why it is illegal. We must hold corrupt politicians like Hillary accountable. If Hillary is elected, I may agree with that one.

      Regardless of the brainwashing your college professor or MSNBC, you are factually wrong.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  5. don't harm the interests of consumers by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..... don't harm the interests of consumers

    That's pretty much a deal breaker.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:don't harm the interests of consumers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think the consumers are the advertisers and the products are the users.. so why is it a deal breaker in this context?

  6. So basically... by Chas · · Score: 1

    Never.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  7. here you go. by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    Message(translate("English", "Mandarin", "go fuck yourself")).sendTo("China");

  8. China's Laws? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The CCP has no issue with the concept of social networks. There are Chinese analogs to every US social network: Facebook --> Renren, Twitter --> Sina Weibo, YouTube --> Youku-Tudou, WeChat --> Snapchat/FB Messenger. What the CCP has issues with is social networks to which its censorship officials are not given unrestricted access so that they can remove posts they dislike. China would happily allow Facebook, Google, etc. inside if they get to decide what content can appear on the sites.

    Obviously, this would require granting Chinese officials access to the internal source code and guts of their operations; were business and government not completely connected in China, with seemingly every business either state-owned or owned by someone who's the child or close crony of some top government official (because that's how one succeeds in business in China--knowing and bribing the right people!), this would be a semi-major concern. But as things are, it's a stop sign approximately the size of Hong Kong. Given the CCP's whimsical control and ability to control every aspect of commerce, business, and economy, there's little to stop them from letting US networks in, stealing their source code, banning them from the country "for the good of the people" and/or "protectionism," selling the secrets to a Chinese firm, and then having the Chinese firm proliferate the world. In the USA, this is much harder to happen given the much weaker link between government and business as well as the general lack of regulation.

    There was a recent article that the Chinese government is beginning to exert censorship on Chinese nationals living abroad by disgracing them and attempting to cut them off from the homeland and the culture they know best. You can bet the CCP has no problems doing this to non-Chinese nationals as well by effecting their standards on the world--control the culture and control the people. Heaven help us all if China ever becomes the dominant nation. It doesn't have to be the USA forever. There are many reasonable countries which can be "#1": South Korea, Japan, the UK, France, Germany, Australia, New Zealand...perhaps an oligarchy of all these countries. Just please don't let it be China or freedom as we know it or imagine it is dead.

  9. Yeah, right by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Just like we respect Saudi Arabia's "laws".

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Yeah, right by johanw · · Score: 1

      The US usually respects Saudi laws because they don't bother US interests. However, it does certainly not respect laws in countries that go against the interests of those who pay the politicians: unwanted copyright laws (or worse: lack thereof) is attacked vigorously by the USA.

  10. Counting the days until Facebook is back by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    I'm not convinced that there isn't any price Zuckerberg wouldn't pay to get back into China. But I also admit that I don't have a great opinion of him.

    During this decade I had two girlfriends (not at the same time) who were both born and raised in China ladies. They weren't very fond of the Chinese government, which is why they didn't want to live in China any more. I used to think that a lot of Chinese people were like that. Then I read recently that a Western news agency did a survey in China and they found overwhelmingly that while Chinese people didn't think their government was perfect and they thought that there were some important things that they still needed to do, basically everything was negotiable and they were willing to give it up in terms of personal freedom if they kept making good money. So now I think that the ladies I once dated were the exceptions to the rule and maybe most Chinese people really don't care at all if they have any freedom as long as they're making some sweet cash. This does not bode well long term for western Democracies. Some forces in China in the military are barely under control of the CCP and it's not going to take much to make them go off on their own and start a war that will have disastrous consequences for everybody, including the winners.

    1. Re:Counting the days until Facebook is back by johanw · · Score: 1

      Well, making some money is of course more important if you don't know how to pay for your dinner tomorrow then if you don't know if you can afford that $100,000 car and should take the $60,000 version instead.

    2. Re:Counting the days until Facebook is back by erapert · · Score: 1

      They weren't very fond of the Chinese government, which is why they didn't want to live in China any more. I used to think that a lot of Chinese people were like that. Then I read recently that a Western news agency did a survey in China and they found overwhelmingly that while Chinese people didn't think their government was perfect and they thought that there were some important things that they still needed to do, basically everything was negotiable and they were willing to give it up in terms of personal freedom if they kept making good money.

      That applies to literally every government, doesn't it?

  11. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sure. The country that poisons its own babies for profit is worried about Internet companies harming consumers. Fuck off, China.

  12. on this site, in 1989, nothing happened by Holammer · · Score: 2

    New search result when you google 'Tiananmen Square'. If they accept.

  13. Re:Corrupt! by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    People throw around the term corruption so much it doesn't mean anything anymore. If a system plays by its own rules, it isn't corrupt. What evidence do you have that the Chinese system does not play by its own rules?

  14. Re:Not take any (money) out? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Where did that come from? I haven't seen any reporting that China is preventing money from leaving its borders.

  15. Re:Not take any (money) out? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    I can attest that, when I flew home from Guangzhou after spending Spring Festival with the in-laws, nobody in the security screening or Customs at Baiyun tried to take away my several very fat hongbao, which very obviously held a lot more cash than one is supposed to be able to take out of the country legally.

    What the Chinese authorities *are* worried about these days are the corrupt businessmen and Party officials smuggling stuff like tens of millions of yuan in cash, gold bars, diamonds, and so forth out of the country, and mainlanders looking to make a quick profit trying to smuggle items that are cheaper in Hong Kong or Macao back to the mainland. At the HK-mainland border, Hong Kongers and foreigners practically get waved through, but the mainlanders tend to receive the fine-toothed comb treatment going both ways.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.