Slashdot Mirror


OMGUbuntu: 'Why Use Linux?' Answered in 3 Short Words (omgubuntu.co.uk)

Linux-focused blog OMGUbuntu's Joey-Elijah Sneddon shared a post today in which he is trying to explain why people should Linux. He stumbled upon the question when he typed "Why use" and Google suggested Linux as one of the most frequent questions. From the article: The question posed is not one that I sincerely ask myself very often. The answer has, over the years, become complicated. It's grown into a bloated ball of elastic bands, each reason stretched around and now reliant on another. But I wanted to answer. Helpfully, my brain began to spit out all the predictable nouns: "Why use Linux? Because of security! Because of control! Because of privacy, community, and a general sense of purpose! Because it's fast! Because it's virus free! Because I'm dang-well used to it now! Because, heck, I can shape it to look like pretty much anything I want it to using themes and widgets and CSS and extensions and blingy little desktop trinkets!"

32 of 269 comments (clear)

  1. Because Windows Sucks by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nuff said.

    1. Re:Because Windows Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Windows 7 is actually pretty damn good.

    2. Re:Because Windows Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem with this answer is it doesn't tell anyone anything. It comes off as an opinion without any useful information to back it up.

    3. Re:Because Windows Sucks by fizzer06 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Windows 7 is actually pretty damn good.

      It was. Beginning in Feb., the updates made it unstable and caused application to not open. I had to remove the updates and disable updating, so security took a hit.

      I ended up removing Windows 7 from my desktop and laptop and installing Linux Mint 18, Cinnamon edition on them. I haven't regretted it one second.

    4. Re:Because Windows Sucks by JoeMerchant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Windows may suck, but they own the hardware driver market, and they still have significant software applications that are Windows only.

      You can "get by" in Linux by picking and choosing your hardware to be supported, you can "get by" with open equivalent software, sometimes. Then there's games...

      For basic web browsing, document writing, and other daily use tasks, I agree, Linux is better. Taken in the big picture, No... even though Windows sucks as an OS, it still provides access to a wider universe of valuable things.

    5. Re: Because Windows Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      And yet the majority of web servers run Linux... I'm not sure how that's security by obscurity...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems#Public_servers_on_the_Internet

    6. Re:Because Windows Sucks by JanneM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only reason Linux is perceived as more secure than other operating systems is because most hackers don't care enough to spend time working to crack it, so there are less attempts.

      Linux is a major server OS (arguably the largest), very big in embedded systems, and completely dominant on smartphones. Hackers are spending very significant time working to find exploits.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    7. Re:Because Windows Sucks by bmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Windows may suck, but they own the hardware driver market,

      Linux supports more hardware than Windows supports at one time. Linux even supports that pre-XP scanner that you had to throw out because Microsoft changed the driver model and the manufacturer said "well, the customers will just have to buy new ones."

      >driver installation on linux vs windows

      It's laughably easier on Linux. Indeed, there aren't these "driver disks" or ridiculously large "driver packs" with bloatware, Flash, Adobe Reader, and Ask toolbars and other totally unrelated junk.

      >no games

      Funny, Steam has plenty of games.

      >but my (obscure game)

      Ah, the last refuge of the Windows shill - windows is a game launcher.

      >wider universe of valuable things

      I find that the software available from the repos is surprisingly good /and/ is not laden with "appeal to the lowest denominator" graphics nonsense (virus scanners on Windows with animations to demonstrate to the user that it's "doing something" as a particularly egregious example). This nonsense is rife throughout the "windows universe of valuable things."

      >daily use tasks Linux is better

      Indeed. And less common tasks too.

      --
      BMO

    8. Re:Because Windows Sucks by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

      ...I find that the software available from the repos is surprisingly good /and/ is not laden with "appeal to the lowest denominator" graphics nonsense (virus scanners on Windows with animations to demonstrate to the user that it's "doing something" as a particularly egregious example). This nonsense is rife throughout the "windows universe of valuable things."

      This, exactly. Just today I was doing some work for my old boss and had to use an old Windows laptop. I kept being interrupted by Norton telling me what a wonderful job it was doing, and Windows asking me if I wanted to disable some IE6 plugins to speed things up - and I wasn't even using IE at the time. It was such an annoying, distracting clownshow, reminiscent of a young child starved for attention and saying 'look at me!'. I've been spoiled by Linux - it (mostly) does what I want, it stays out of the way, its automatic update process is very polite and graceful, and I can do everything I need to do, including schematic capture and PCB design. I truly feel sorry for those who have no choice but to use Windows on an ongoing basis.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    9. Re:Because Windows Sucks by Visarga · · Score: 2

      > The Linux ecosystem is growing, and getting more an more useable as a professional platform

      The Linux ecosystem (or more exactly, open source) is a black hole that eats voraciously and has become so big that Windows is just including it as a subsystem. They can't block or ignore it any more. The more software is contributed in open source, the more powerful attraction it has.

    10. Re:Because Windows Sucks by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Ahhhh yes. FUD.

      It is a fact that Microsoft has been pushing shit updates to Windows 7 for a while now. I haven't looked at updates in the last week or so, but there was a while there where they were stuffing their spyware (aka "CEIP" and "telemetry") into updates left and right, including a couple of so-called security updates. Some of their updates did in fact break software. This information is all readily available if you search for things like "which windows 7 updates do I need to avoid".

      Since the rate of updates has now slowed to a trickle, however, it's reasonably easy to check to see what each update does. And since on Windows 7 you actually can prevent automatic updates without disabling the update service, there's no real excuse for being far out of date. On the other hand, if someone is just fed up with Microsoft and would rather switch than deal with removing their malicious updates and wondering if they will push more of them, that seems reasonable to me.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re: Because Windows Sucks by fizzer06 · · Score: 2

      Yes, in the VMWare player where I run Windows 7.

  2. I use linux because by NotInHere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    * it has bash plus coreutils and all the other command line toolset
    * its software is free as in beer (this is what made me try out linux)
    * its software is free as in software (this is what made me stay on linux for so long)
    * all the things I do with computers can be done with it, and when there is a case I can't do it on linux, I can always fire up the windows VM (happens very very rarely)
    * it has working package management. updating software is no nightmare. Windows has to force its customers to update it, because its a nightmare.
    * most support issues are talked about and you find something you can instantly do not where you have to download this little exe then execute it (and god knows what it may contain). Maybe this will get worse if/when linux adoption reaches the non technical people, its very hard to find such things for android for example.

    many other things I have forgotten, but I will surely miss when I have to use windows or mac.

    1. Re:I use linux because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      * its software is free as in beer (this is what made me try out linux)

      For almost all practical purposes so is Windows and you can get all the good Linux software on Windows and Mac too.

      * its software is free as in software (this is what made me stay on linux for so long)

      Like it or not, users in the vast majority don't care about that and it won't draw them to Linux. As far as the software is concerned that same free software like Blender, Gimp and LibreOffice are available on Windows and Mac too. No exclusivity to Linux.

      * it has working package management. updating software is no nightmare. Windows has to force its customers to update it, because its a nightmare.

      yep! But remember Windows has Chocolatey and Mac has Homebrew, this covers many of the free software options and for proprietary software you most often need to go through their updaters whether you're on Windows, Mac or Linux anyway.

      It's great that it does what you need but you have to remember that above anything else a computer is a tool to run the programs a user needs and while Windows and Mac run pretty much anything Linux does the same cannot be said the other way around and most standard applications in industry support Windows & Mac but not Linux. It might be more secure and/or more stable and free of charge and open source but none of those things matter if it doesn't run the applications I need.

      So it's a chicken and egg problem, if you want people to use it they need their applications to support it and to do that you need users. So what you need to offer is some disruptive innovation, some great feature that draws people to Linux, something so good that they would be willing to temporarily forgo the lack of applications and work through the kludge of dual-booting or VMs until their programs supported Linux as a first class citizen. But for the entire life of the hundreds of Linux desktop distributions none has ever offered the user such a feature(s).

      Now you can pretend this isn't true, mod it down and fantasize about how desktop Linux is simple held back by a big conspiracy perpetrated by Microsoft and Apple but the fact is it has succeeded incredibly in pretty much all other markets including those in which Microsoft and Apple participate - and it dominates! Server? Dominates! Embedded? Dominates! Mobile? Dominates! Desktop? Utter failure!

    2. Re:I use linux because by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Windows is already shipping with lots of crap. Compare that to linux, where only very few parts are crap.

      In large part because it's not mainstream. If it were mainstream then logitech and razer and your printer and adobe and so forth would tart the place up in no time...

    3. Re:I use linux because by somenickname · · Score: 2

      Well, I guess I'll trot it out a third time: "Maybe, maybe not". Part of the reason the situation has gotten so bad on Windows is because Windows has never really shipped with a meaningful driver set. So, it's normal for people to tart up their system with driver malware. Linux has basically always shipped with every driver it has supported and, in many, many cases the vendors of those devices have not written those drivers.

      So, yes, I'll agree that vendors are going to want to install their malware on any mainstream platform. But, the Linux tradition is a lot different than the Windows tradition and so I'm not sure if it could ever happen. If Linux on the Desktop started to become mainstream, it would be trivial for a distro to literally lock out third party drivers. It's like 2 options in the kernel config: 1) Required signed drivers. 2) Sign drivers with a randomly generated key.

      At that point, vendors need to play nice or they don't get to put a little penguin on the box of their hardware. And, if Linux on the Desktop were popular, they'd want that little penguin.

  3. Clickbait by Verdatum · · Score: 2, Informative

    Really, Slashdot? Clickbait? "Because it's better". Would that have been so difficult to throw into the Summary? I'm ashamed.

  4. 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    2016 and if I upgrade my kernel to 4.7, no wifi...again. Fucking Linux still sucks.

    1. Re:2016 by brantondaveperson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A) "Linux 4.7 was released on Sun, 24 Jul 2016." It's released, making it not bleeding edge alpha. B) Typical attitude. Outrageous really. Broken wifi support is not the end-users 'fault'. C) Unsupported assumption. Maybe he's got a really good wifi adapter - you certainly don't know.

    2. Re: 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Using kernel.org kernels directly instead of the distribution supplied one is bleeding edge and is not something that you should do unless you know how to fix problems like the one gp encountered.

  5. No. Vendor. Lockin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No. Vendor. Lockin.

    1. Re:No. Vendor. Lockin. by Etcetera · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure, but we're now replacing that with ecosystem lockin on the Linux side. Thanks, systemd.

      Linux was a free-as-in-speech, *and* free-as-in-beer version of Unix... The Windows devs who've invaded seem to want to bring lockin back by standardizing the Vendor layer across their own userland middleware, and FreeDesktop locked we shall be.

  6. Why use Linux? by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    So that your nerdy friend will stop bugging you to use a *real* operating system, and start bugging you to read the fine manual! :D

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  7. Three words? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not Windows.
    It's not spyware.
    It's not Microsoft.
    It respects you.
    It's your computer!
    Try it today!

    1. Re:Three words? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It doesn't easily run the games I want to play.

  8. Use FreeBSD Instead by mrun4982 · · Score: 4, Informative

    for servers at least. Sorry, but I'll stick with Windows and OSX for desktop usage for wider software support and both are good enough these days.

  9. Because PRISM by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    ""Keeps your secrets" vs "Do no privacy"
    "National Security Agency"
    "Secret Intelligence Service"
    Who wants code by private sector teams that allowed 5 eye nations to get all the plain text for years?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  10. Are the three words... by roesti · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... "I love systemd"? I bet that's what they are.

  11. OSX is better for laptops by hawguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been a hard-core LInux user for over 15 years, running it on desktops, laptops, everything, completely eschewing the WIndows ecosystem (except for some occasional Wine use). Then I moved to an employer that is 100% OSX based. Running Linux on a bare metal Macbook was not an option due to the necessity of running security software mandated by their compliance department (along with a security token for MFA that doesn't work with Linux).

    So I switched to OSX and run Linux in a VM, ssh'ing to it as needed.

    I was reluctant to make the switch at first, but now am quite happy with OSX as my main OS -- everything works, the laptop sleeps and wakes up as it should, the integrated touchpad and camera work flawlessly, it switches from a single monitor to my double desktop monitors without a problem, then switches back to the laptop display when I unplug. Presentation mode works well when I plug in the projector.

    While running running Linux on my thinkpad, I've experienced lots of problems -- sometimes the laptop would fail to suspend -- I'd pull it out of my backpack and it'd be hot with a nearly dead battery after continuing to run while the lid was closed, sometimes it would fail to wake up and I'd have to power cycle it. Sound was a recurring problem, I'd have to restart the sound daemon at least once a week, and plugging in an external monitor was always an exercise in finding out where my windows scattered to and hoping that it found the right resolution for my monitor.

    On the server side, I'm a big fan of Linux, but on the desktop, I'm become a fan of OSX.

  12. Re:Why not use Linux by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You haven't worked with normal users much, have you? It can be a shock how little most people understand their computers and how they work. They simply memorize the actions needed to accomplish specific tasks, and that's good enough for them. The big blue E icon on their desktop means "the internet", until it drives someone they know who's a bit more knowledgeable insane, and they replace it with a Fox or round primary icon, and then THAT becomes "the internet" for them.

    I'll put it bluntly. No, normal users should stay away from the terminal, nor should they *need* to use it for daily operations. If they're interested in learning how to work at a command prompt, that just means they're probably on the verge of becoming a power user. That's not a bad thing, of course, but it's not what most people want to spend their time doing.

    Figuring out how to use a terminal requires a non-trivial learning curve. That's because there's no intuitive method of command / feature discovery, unlike with a menu, toolbars with tooltips, and dialog boxes that show you all the options in a visual, hierarchical format. There's a reason GUIs are ubiquitous in nearly all computing platforms today, with the possible exception of headless servers, embedded systems, and other specialized systems.

    I'm a programmer, so yes, I'm comfortable with various shells, but I think some people seem to overly fetishize it, like it's a badge of their geekdom or a symbol of their arcane power over a computer. The command line is just power and flexibility at the expense of user friendliness. Once learned, it's a very handy tool in your arsenal, and can be more efficient for some type of operations. Don't pretend it's anything but that, or you're just fooling yourself.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  13. Re:To play games by nukenerd · · Score: 2

    i'm stuck with windows because it'd be far too much work having to reboot any time i want to just play a game if i dual booted.

    Have two computers. With so many people replacing their desktops with tablets you can buy a very good used desktop PC for peanuts (I have four). Use one just for Windows games and be ready to re-install when it gets malware. Keep your serious work, web surfing and data on a different PC under Linux.

  14. Four words by allo · · Score: 2

    "because it's better" are four words.