'Anonymous' Hacker Indicted As His Hunger Strike Continues (newsweek.com)

Eight months after being rescued at sea near Cuba and then arrested, Anonymous hacker Martin Gottesfeld now faces prosecution as well as death by hunger. Newsweek reports: A member of Anonymous has been indicted on hacking charges while on the third week of a prison hunger strike protesting perceived institutionalized torture and political prosecutions. Martin Gottesfeld, 32, was charged this week in relation to the hacking of Boston Children's Hospital in 2014 following the alleged mistreatment of one of its patients. Gottesfeld has previously admitted to targeting the hospital, though says he did it in defense of "an innocent, learning-disabled, 15-year-old girl"...

Since beginning his hunger strike on October 3, Gottesfeld tells Newsweek from prison he has lost 16.5 pounds. He says he will continue his hunger strike until two demands are met: a promise from the presidential candidates that children are not mistreated in the way he claims Pelletier was; and an end to the "political" style of prosecution waged by Carmen Ortiz, the U.S. attorney for Massachusetts.
The indictment claims that the hospital spent more than $300,000 to "mitigate" the damage from the 2014 attack.

Comments

Re:A member of Anonymous

[Anonymous Coward]

Could there be a more infantile group wannabes?

Yeah, the Trump campaign and his followers

Lesson

[Kohath]

Save yourself from hunger and indictment by not being a jerk. Not being a jerk to people has many benefits.

Re:Lesson

[Sad Loser]

I agree. IAAD but not in US and not involved in this case.

When you practice medicine you are always surprised at what you find and you would not believe some of the things we see.
Patients in wheelchairs who are physically and neurologically normal. Patients who present with strange and catastrophic conditions who then turn out to be known Munchausens.

In the case of adults if someone chooses to do strange things we do not have any interest or right to stop them, providing they are not harming others.

However in the case of children, if we believe that illness is not present, and therefore that the child is being harmed by the presumption of illness, then we have a duty of care to the child to prevent it. It is not negotiable - we have legal and moral duty to do this. An example of this is children whose parents poison (and sometimes kill) using salt. These situations are very rarely immediately obvious.

This guy has taken on himself to judge this difficult and messy situation, and unless you are directly involved in the case and have some expertise to bring to the table, a lot of people would agree with you that this indeed makes it likely to be a jerk.

Re:Hunger strike... how silly

[JaredOfEuropa]

IT writers, popular press and especially Holywood have been getting the definition of "hacker" wrong for over 25 years.

It's a lost battle. The word "hacker" has pretty much been redefined to mean someone who breaks into computers. That's how language works.